No more exam failing with M2090-234 Actual Questions by killexams.com

We now have valid and upwards currently M2090-234 Exam Concerns. killexams.com provides the specific in addition to most recent M2090-234 Practice Test that will practically contain just about all tricky questions. With all the practice of the M2090-234 test dumps, a person Does not have in order to bother about your real M2090-234 exam. Simply, a person needs to devote 10-24 hours in order to memorize our M2090-234 Actual Questions in addition to answers before a person actually face an authentic exam.

Exam Code: M2090-234 Practice exam 2022 by Killexams.com team
IBM Netezza Sales Mastery Test v1
IBM Netezza approach
Killexams : IBM Netezza approach - BingNews https://killexams.com/pass4sure/exam-detail/M2090-234 Search results Killexams : IBM Netezza approach - BingNews https://killexams.com/pass4sure/exam-detail/M2090-234 https://killexams.com/exam_list/IBM Killexams : Netezza, Seeking $100M in IPO, Builds “Superior” Data Warehousing Gadgets

[UPDATE Thursday 7/19/07: Trading of Netezza (NZ) shares opened today at $12 per share, slightly higher than the company’s original target price, and had risen to $16.85 by 2:00 pm EDT. -eds.]

It’s a big day for Framingham-based Netezza, which makes uber-data devices used by large enterprises like Amazon and Nieman Marcus to combine storage, server, and database functions in a single system. The seven-year-old company hopes to raise about $100 million in an IPO scheduled for today.

It goes without saying that enterprises need faster, better, cheaper ways to store, manage, and manipulate large amounts of data about their products and customers—just look at the hours- to days-long waits suffered by hundreds of thousands of new Apple customers as they tried to get AT&T to activate their new Apple iPhones. Netezza (Urdu for “results”) speeds up data handling by placing software for parsing and filtering data on the same machines with disk drives, eliminating the need to haul data back and forth between storage systems and offboard CPUs. Amazon, for example, replaced an Oracle database that it was using to analyze 25 terabytes of “clickstream” data, records of customers’ travels through its website, with a Netezza system that ran up to 37 times as fast.

Sun, IBM, EMC, NCR’s Teradata subsidiary, and other companies are competing in this niche—which might loosely be described as “business intelligence mining”—but Netezza’s platform is “superior,” according to Todd Dagres, general partner at Boston-based technology investment fund Spark Capital. (Dagres is a former general partner at Battery Ventures, one of Netezza’s backers, but he is not bound by the “quiet period” rules affecting what company insiders can say to the press around IPO time.) “Teradata is their biggest competitor, and I think they’ll have a pretty easy time competing against them,” Dagres says. “They make a niche product, but it’s a fairly large niche, and if they can get 25 to 30 percent of that market they will be a pretty profitable company.”

Future tense is appropriate, though, given that the company been operating at a loss since its founding in September, 2000. But those losses are narrowing; in the quarter ending April 30, Netezza earned $25.3 million, had gross profits of $15.3 million and suffered an operating loss of only $1.6 million. “I hope that their going public is a sign that they feel that earnings are predictable,” says Dagres. “They have a very aggressive team there [the company’s CEO and co-founder is Jitendra Saxena, veteran of successful business-analytics provider Applix] and they have a fairly significant advantage over the companies that are already out there in the market.”

Netezza will trade on the NYSE Arca exchange under the ticker symbol NZ.

Wade Roush is a freelance science and technology journalist and the producer and host of the podcast Soonish.

Trending on Xconomy

Sun, 17 Jul 2022 11:59:00 -0500 Wade Roush en text/html https://xconomy.com/boston/2007/07/18/netezza-seeking-100m-in-ipo-builds-superior-data-warehousing-gadgets/ Killexams : Top 10 data lake solution vendors in 2022

Were you unable to attend Transform 2022? Check out all of the summit sessions in our on-demand library now! Watch here.

As the world becomes increasingly data-driven, businesses must find suitable solutions to help them achieve their desired outcomes. Data lake storage has garnered the attention of many organizations that need to store large amounts of unstructured, raw information until it can be used in analytics applications.

The data lake solution market is expected to grow rapidly in the coming years and is driven by vendors that offer cost-effective, scalable solutions for their customers.

Learn more about data lake solutions, what key features they should have and some of the top vendors to consider this year.

What is a data lake solution?

A data lake is defined as a single, centralized repository that can store massive amounts of unstructured and semi-structured information in its native, raw form.

It’s common for an organization to store unstructured data in a data lake if it hasn’t decided how that information will be used. Some examples of unstructured data include images, documents, videos and audio. These data types are useful in today’s advanced machine learning (ML) and advanced analytics applications.

Data lakes differ from data warehouses, which store structured, filtered information for specific purposes in files or folders. Data lakes were created in response to some of the limitations of data warehouses. For example, data warehouses are expensive and proprietary, cannot handle certain business use cases an organization must address, and may lead to unwanted information homogeneity.

On-premise data lake solutions were commonly used before the widespread adoption of the cloud. Now, it’s understood that some of the best hosts for data lakes are cloud-based platforms on the edge because of their inherent scalability and considerably modular services.

A 2019 report from the Government Accountability Office (GAO) highlights several business benefits of using the cloud, including better customer service and the acquisition of cost-effective options for IT management services.

Cloud data lakes and on-premise data lakes have pros and cons. Businesses should consider cost, scale and available technical resources to decide which type is best.

Read more about data lakes: What is a data lake? Definition, benefits, architecture and best practices

5 must-have features of a data lake solution

It’s critical to understand what features a data lake offers. Most solutions come with the same core components, but each vendor may have specific offerings or unique selling points (USPs) that could influence a business’s decision.

Below are five key features every data lake should have:

1. Various interfaces, APIs and endpoints

Data lakes that offer diverse interfaces, APIs and endpoints can make it much easier to upload, access and move information. These capabilities are important for a data lake because it allows unstructured data for a wide range of use cases, depending on a business’s desired outcome.

2. Support for or connection to processing and analytics layers

ML engineers, data scientists, decision-makers and analysts benefit most from a centralized data lake solution that stores information for easy access and availability. This characteristic can help data professionals and IT managers work with data more seamlessly and efficiently, thus improving productivity and helping companies reach their goals.

3. Robust search and cataloging features

Imagine a data lake with large amounts of information but no sense of organization. A viable data lake solution must incorporate generic organizational methods and search capabilities, which provide the most value for its users. Other features might include key-value storage, tagging, metadata, or tools to classify and collect subsets of information.

4. Security and access control

Security and access control are two must-have features with any digital tool. The current cybersecurity landscape is expanding, making it easier for threat actors to exploit a company’s data and cause irreparable damage. Only certain users should have access to a data lake, and the solution must have strong security to protect sensitive information.

5. Flexibility and scalability

More organizations are growing larger and operating at a much faster rate. Data lake solutions must be flexible and scalable to meet the ever-changing needs of modern businesses working with information.

Also read: Unlocking analytics with data lake and graph analysis

The importance of choosing the right data lake solution vendor

Companies that spend extra time researching which vendors will offer the best enterprise data lake solutions for them can manage their information better. Rather than choose any vendor, it’s best to consider all options available and determine which solutions will meet the specific needs of an organization.

Every business uses information, some more than others. However, the world is becoming highly data-driven — therefore, leveraging the right data solutions will only grow more important in the coming years. This list will help companies decide which data lake solution vendor is right for their operations.

VentureBeat's mission is to be a digital town square for technical decision-makers to gain knowledge about transformative enterprise technology and transact. Learn more about membership.

Fri, 15 Jul 2022 07:14:00 -0500 Shannon Flynn en-US text/html https://venturebeat.com/2022/07/15/top-10-data-lake-solution-vendors-in-2022/ Killexams : A Dozen Lessons for Entrepreneurs

Our systems have detected unusual traffic activity from your network. Please complete this reCAPTCHA to demonstrate that it's you making the requests and not a robot. If you are having trouble seeing or completing this challenge, this page may help. If you continue to experience issues, you can contact JSTOR support.

Block Reference: #fb4c8408-165b-11ed-b7ee-7467516d4c46
VID: #
IP: 108.167.164.204
Date and time: Sun, 07 Aug 2022 14:19:43 GMT

Go back to JSTOR

Thu, 07 Dec 2017 23:54:00 -0600 en text/html https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7312/grif18482 Killexams : IBM Report: Consumers Pay the Price as Data Breach Costs Reach All-Time High

60% of breached businesses raised product prices post-breach; vast majority of critical infrastructure lagging in zero trust adoption; $550,000 in extra costs for insufficiently staffed businesses

CAMBRIDGE, Mass., July 27, 2022 /CNW/ -- IBM IBM Security today released the annual Cost of a Data Breach Report,¹ revealing costlier and higher-impact data breaches than ever before, with the global average cost of a data breach reaching an all-time high of $4.35 million for studied organizations. With breach costs increasing nearly 13% over the last two years of the report, the findings suggest these incidents may also be contributing to rising costs of goods and services. In fact, 60% of studied organizations raised their product or services prices due to the breach, when the cost of goods is already soaring worldwide amid inflation and supply chain issues.

The perpetuality of cyberattacks is also shedding light on the "haunting effect" data breaches are having on businesses, with the IBM report finding 83% of studied organizations have experienced more than one data breach in their lifetime. Another factor rising over time is the after-effects of breaches on these organizations, which linger long after they occur, as nearly 50% of breach costs are incurred more than a year after the breach.

The 2022 Cost of a Data Breach Report is based on in-depth analysis of real-world data breaches experienced by 550 organizations globally between March 2021 and March 2022. The research, which was sponsored and analyzed by IBM Security, was conducted by the Ponemon Institute.

Some of the key findings in the 2022 IBM report include:

Critical Infrastructure Lags in Zero Trust – Almost 80% of critical infrastructure organizations studied don't adopt zero trust strategies, seeing average breach costs rise to $5.4 million – a $1.17 million increase compared to those that do. All while 28% of breaches amongst these organizations were ransomware or destructive attacks.
It Doesn't Pay to Pay – Ransomware victims in the study that opted to pay threat actors' ransom demands saw only $610,000 less in average breach costs compared to those that chose not to pay – not including the cost of the ransom. Factoring in the high cost of ransom payments, the financial toll may rise even higher, suggesting that simply paying the ransom may not be an effective strategy.
Security Immaturity in Clouds – Forty-three percent of studied organizations are in the early stages or have not started applying security practices across their cloud environments, observing over $660,000 on average in higher breach costs than studied organizations with mature security across their cloud environments.
Security AI and Automation Leads as Multi-Million Dollar Cost Saver – Participating organizations fully deploying security AI and automation incurred $3.05 million less on average in breach costs compared to studied organizations that have not deployed the technology – the biggest cost saver observed in the study.

"Businesses need to put their security defenses on the offense and beat attackers to the punch. It's time to stop the adversary from achieving their objectives and start to minimize the impact of attacks. The more businesses try to perfect their perimeter instead of investing in detection and response, the more breaches can fuel cost of living increases." said Charles Henderson, Global Head of IBM Security X-Force. "This report shows that the right strategies coupled with the right technologies can help make all the difference when businesses are attacked."

Over-trusting Critical Infrastructure Organizations
Concerns over critical infrastructure targeting appear to be increasing globally over the past year, with many governments' cybersecurity agencies urging vigilance against disruptive attacks. In fact, IBM's report reveals that ransomware and destructive attacks represented 28% of breaches amongst critical infrastructure organizations studied, highlighting how threat actors are seeking to fracture the global supply chains that rely on these organizations. This includes financial services, industrial, transportation and healthcare companies amongst others.

Despite the call for caution, and a year after the Biden Administration issued a cybersecurity executive order that centers around the importance of adopting a zero trust approach to strengthen the nation's cybersecurity, only 21% of critical infrastructure organizations studied adopt a zero trust security model, according to the report. Add to that, 17% of breaches at critical infrastructure organizations were caused due to a business partner being initially compromised, highlighting the security risks that over-trusting environments pose.

Businesses that Pay the Ransom Aren't Getting a "Bargain"
According to the 2022 IBM report, businesses that paid threat actors' ransom demands saw $610,000 less in average breach costs compared to those that chose not to pay – not including the ransom amount paid. However, when accounting for the average ransom payment, which according to Sophos reached $812,000 in 2021, businesses that opt to pay the ransom could net higher total costs - all while inadvertently funding future ransomware attacks with capital that could be allocated to remediation and recovery efforts and looking at potential federal offenses.

The persistence of ransomware, despite significant global efforts to impede it, is fueled by the industrialization of cybercrime. IBM Security X-Force discovered the duration of studied enterprise ransomware attacks shows a drop of 94% over the past three years – from over two months to just under four days. These exponentially shorter attack lifecycles can prompt higher impact attacks, as cybersecurity incident responders are left with very short windows of opportunity to detect and contain attacks. With "time to ransom" dropping to a matter of hours, it's essential that businesses prioritize rigorous testing of incident response (IR) playbooks ahead of time. But the report states that as many as 37% of organizations studied that have incident response plans don't test them regularly.

Hybrid Cloud Advantage
The report also showcased hybrid cloud environments as the most prevalent (45%) infrastructure amongst organizations studied. Averaging $3.8 million in breach costs, businesses that adopted a hybrid cloud model observed lower breach costs compared to businesses with a solely public or private cloud model, which experienced $5.02 million and $4.24 million on average respectively. In fact, hybrid cloud adopters studied were able to identify and contain data breaches 15 days faster on average than the global average of 277 days for participants.

The report highlights that 45% of studied breaches occurred in the cloud, emphasizing the importance of cloud security. However, a significant 43% of reporting organizations stated they are just in the early stages or have not started implementing security practices to protect their cloud environments, observing higher breach costs². Businesses studied that did not implement security practices across their cloud environments required an average 108 more days to identify and contain a data breach than those consistently applying security practices across all their domains.

Additional findings in the 2022 IBM report include:

Phishing Becomes Costliest Breach Cause – While compromised credentials continued to reign as the most common cause of a breach (19%), phishing was the second (16%) and the costliest cause, leading to $4.91 million in average breach costs for responding organizations.
Healthcare Breach Costs Hit Double Digits for First Time Ever– For the 12^th year in a row, healthcare participants saw the costliest breaches amongst industries with average breach costs in healthcare increasing by nearly $1 million to reach a record high of $10.1 million.
Insufficient Security Staffing – Sixty-two percent of studied organizations stated they are not sufficiently staffed to meet their security needs, averaging $550,000 more in breach costs than those that state they are sufficiently staffed.

Additional Sources

To download a copy of the 2022 Cost of a Data Breach Report, please visit: https://www.ibm.com/security/data-breach.
Read more about the report's top findings in this IBM Security Intelligence blog.
Sign up for the 2022 IBM Security Cost of a Data Breach webinar on Wednesday, August 3, 2022, at 11:00 a.m. ET here.
Connect with the IBM Security X-Force team for a personalized review of the findings: https://ibm.biz/book-a-consult.

About IBM Security
IBM Security offers one of the most advanced and integrated portfolios of enterprise security products and services. The portfolio, supported by world-renowned IBM Security X-Force^® research, enables organizations to effectively manage risk and defend against emerging threats. IBM operates one of the world's broadest security research, development, and delivery organizations, monitors 150 billion+ security events per day in more than 130 countries, and has been granted more than 10,000 security patents worldwide. For more information, please check www.ibm.com/security, follow @IBMSecurity on Twitter or visit the IBM Security Intelligence blog.

Press Contact:

IBM Security Communications
Georgia Prassinos
gprassinos@ibm.com

¹ Cost of a Data Breach Report 2022, conducted by Ponemon Institute, sponsored, and analyzed by IBM
² Average cost of $4.53M, compared to average cost $3.87 million at participating organizations with mature-stage cloud security practices

View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/ibm-report-consumers-pay-the-price-as-data-breach-costs-reach-all-time-high-301592749.html

SOURCE IBM

View original content to download multimedia: http://www.newswire.ca/en/releases/archive/July2022/27/c2517.html

Ad Disclosure: The rate information is obtained by Bankrate from the listed institutions. Bankrate cannot guaranty the accuracy or availability of any rates shown above. Institutions may have different rates on their own websites than those posted on Bankrate.com. The listings that appear on this page are from companies from which this website receives compensation, which may impact how, where, and in what order products appear. This table does not include all companies or all available products.

All rates are subject to change without notice and may vary depending on location. These quotes are from banks, thrifts, and credit unions, some of whom have paid for a link to their own Web site where you can find additional information. Those with a paid link are our Advertisers. Those without a paid link are listings we obtain to Boost the consumer shopping experience and are not Advertisers. To receive the Bankrate.com rate from an Advertiser, please identify yourself as a Bankrate customer. Bank and thrift deposits are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. Credit union deposits are insured by the National Credit Union Administration.

Consumer Satisfaction: Bankrate attempts to verify the accuracy and availability of its Advertisers' terms through its quality assurance process and requires Advertisers to agree to our Terms and Conditions and to adhere to our Quality Control Program. If you believe that you have received an inaccurate quote or are otherwise not satisfied with the services provided to you by the institution you choose, please click here.

Rate collection and criteria: Click here for more information on rate collection and criteria.

Tue, 26 Jul 2022 16:01:00 -0500 text/html https://www.benzinga.com/pressreleases/22/07/n28217609/ibm-report-consumers-pay-the-price-as-data-breach-costs-reach-all-time-high Killexams : Chase Corporation Appoints Ellen Rubin to its Board of Directors

Chase Corporation Appoints Ellen Rubin to its Board of Directors

Chase Corporation (NYSE American: CCF), a global specialty chemicals company that is a leading manufacturer of protective materials for high-reliability applications across diverse market sectors, announced on July 14, 2022 that the Board of Directors elected Ellen Rubin to the Board, as an independent director, effective immediately. Additionally, she will serve as a member of Chase’s Audit Committee.

Peter Chase, Chairman of the Board, commented “We are thrilled to be adding Ellen Rubin’s leadership, industry knowledge, and expertise to our Board of Directors as we continue to expand our business, drive scale, and deliver against our proven growth strategy. Ms. Rubin brings to our Board an extensive leadership background and CEO experience which she gained while scaling startups, including ClearSky Data and CloudSwitch, and as a General Manager at Amazon Web Services, which operate within the growing area of cloud computing. Ms. Rubin’s proven leadership and knowledge within the information technology space render success, and we look forward to her contribution within our Board of Directors.”

Dana Mohler-Faria, Independent Director and Chair of the Nominating Governance Committee, commented, “Ms. Rubin’s unique experience serving as CEO and Founder across multiple innovation-based organizations and hands-on capital markets activity and acquisition experience are well-aligned with Chase’s strategy and will strengthen our Board’s perspective and acumen. We look forward to working alongside Ms. Rubin on our Board of Directors.”

“I’m excited to join the Chase Corporation brand during its time of growth and expansion, especially with the latest NuCera acquisition,” Ms. Rubin said, “Chase’s market-leading products are at the core of many global industries emerging technologies, and I share the Company’s commitment to make a material difference for our customers and partners.”

Ms. Rubin brings 20 plus years of experience as a technology CEO and founder in building and scaling companies and expertise working with enterprise and global customers in manufacturing, financial services, healthcare and other industries. Ellen Rubin was CEO and Founder of ClearSky Data (acquired by Amazon), and later served as General Manager at Amazon Web Services for several hybrid cloud services. Previously, Ellen Rubin was CEO and Founder of CloudSwitch (acquired by Verizon). Earlier in her career she was VP Marketing at Netezza, a leader in the data warehousing market, that went public in 2007 and was subsequently acquired by IBM. Ellen Rubin has been recognized as one of the Top 10 Women in the Cloud by CloudNOW, and currently serves as an independent Board Director at Corvus Insurance. Ellen Rubin has an MBA from Harvard Business School.

About Chase Corporation

Chase Corporation, a global specialty chemicals company that was founded in 1946, is a leading manufacturer of protective materials for high-reliability applications throughout the world. More information can be found on our website https://chasecorp.com/

Cautionary Note Concerning Forward-Looking Statements

Certain statements in our press releases are forward-looking. These may be identified by the use of forward-looking words or phrases including, but not limited to, “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “should,” “planned,” “estimated”, “growth”, “expansion” and “potential.” The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a “safe harbor” for such forward-looking statements. To comply with the terms of the safe harbor, the Company cautions investors that any forward-looking statements made by the Company are not guarantees of future performance and that a variety of factors could cause the Company’s genuine results and experience to differ materially from the anticipated results or other expectations expressed in the Company’s forward-looking statements. The risks and uncertainties which may affect the operations, performance, development and results of the Company’s business include, but are not limited to, the following: uncertainties relating to the timing of the acquisition and receipt of required regulatory approvals; the risk that the businesses involved in the acquisition will not be integrated successfully or that such integration may be more difficult, time-consuming or costly than expected; the risk that expected revenue synergies and cost savings from the transaction may not be fully realized or realized within the expected time frame; the risk that revenues following the acquisition may be lower than expected; uncertainties relating to operating costs, potential customer loss and business disruption following the transaction, including, without limitation, the risk that difficulties in maintaining relationships with employees, may be greater than expected; uncertainties relating to economic conditions including inflation; uncertainties relating to customer plans and commitments; the pricing and availability of equipment, materials and inventories; technological developments; performance issues with suppliers and subcontractors; economic growth; delays in testing of new products; the effectiveness of cost-reduction plans; rapid technology changes; the highly competitive environment in which the Company operates; as well as expected impact of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic on the Company’s businesses. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date the statement was made. The Company does not assume any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statement made in this release or that may from time to time be made by or on behalf of the Company. Additional information regarding the factors that may cause genuine results to differ materially from these forward-looking statements is available in the Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the risks and uncertainties identified in Part I, Item 1A – Risk Factors of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended August 31, 2021.

Investor & Media Contact:
Michael Cummings or Jackie Marcus
Alpha IR Group
Phone: (617) 982-0475
E-mail: CCF@alpha-ir.com

Shareholder & Investor Relations Department
Phone: (781) 332-0700
E-mail: investorrelations@chasecorp.com
Website: www.chasecorp.com

View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20220720006035/en/

Wed, 20 Jul 2022 09:43:00 -0500 en text/html https://www.morningstar.com/news/business-wire/20220720006035/chase-corporation-appoints-ellen-rubin-to-its-board-of-directors Killexams : ObserveIT, Led by Ex-NHL Defender, Looks to Shut Down Cyber Threats

Some comparisons between business and sports are cliché. But when it comes to leadership in cybersecurity, having a CEO who knows how to play defense can be pretty relevant.

That bodes well for ObserveIT, a Boston-based security tech company focused on stopping insider threats. In March, the firm brought on a new chief executive, Mike McKee, who had been senior vice president at Rapid7, and before that, had spent more than a decade at PTC, the Massachusetts-based design software company. (Several prominent CEOs have come out of PTC—Brian Halligan of HubSpot and Jim Baum from Netezza come to mind. Something about the sales-driven culture there, perhaps.)

One thing that sets McKee apart is his pro sports background. He was drafted out of Princeton in 1990 by the Québec Nordiques of the National Hockey League; he was a defenseman in the team’s system until the mid-90s. (The Nordiques later moved and became the Colorado Avalanche.) An NHL trading card from the ‘93-94 season says “his poise, intelligence and skating skills are his biggest attributes.”

Mike McKee, defenseman for the Quebec Nordiques in early-to-mid 1990s

After retiring from hockey, McKee worked in finance, went to Harvard Business School, and hooked up with PTC, where he climbed the ladder in sales, services, operations, and strategy.

Rapid7 was his first direct experience in cybersecurity. McKee joined in 2013 to build up the company’s services organization, which has since become a big part of the business, along with vulnerability testing and incident detection. The job was a crash course in both cyber threats and management psychology.

“In most businesses, you’re up against competitors, and you have to figure out how to do better than them,” McKee says. “In security, you also have hackers and the whole underworld of the dark Web.” (Maybe a bit like having fans or league officials who can actually control the game.)

What’s more, he says, unlike other types of enterprise software, the underlying technology in security is “always changing, the threats are always changing… It’s like you’re playing different teams—one day it’s the Swedes, then the Russians, then the Finns.”

Yet another hockey parallel (then I’ll stop) is the meshing of different personality types on a team. McKee says Rapid7 did a fair bit of psychological profiling to match its executives with different roles. “It makes a huge difference in terms of being able to work together,” he says, adding that “goalies are always weird.”

For its part, ObserveIT (pronounced “observe it”) got started in Tel Aviv in 2006. The 100-person company was bootstrapped until about three years ago, when Bain Capital Ventures invested $20 million. That led to the company moving its headquarters to Boston, while maintaining offices in Israel. And it was Bain that approached Rapid7’s CEO Corey Thomas about poaching McKee, after Rapid7 had gone public—the Boston area’s only tech IPO of 2015. Bain was Rapid7’s lead investor as well, dating back to 2008.

ObserveIT’s co-founder and CTO, Gaby Friedlander, has a background in IT forensics and troubleshooting. He started the company to focus on insider threats to cybersecurity—for example, employees who do things like use unauthorized servers or send company files over Gmail, either with or without malicious intent.

Gaby Friedlander

Most insider threats seem to be unintentional. Friedlander says most employees “care about doing their job more than being secure,” and that “the unintentional is happening on a daily basis.”

ObserveIT’s approach is to monitor what users and employees are doing on their computers, educate them about risky behaviors, and either block them or suggest alternatives as necessary.

The company’s software sits on a server or desktop computer and takes screenshots of what employees are doing; it can send them alerts when it detects risky behavior, like downloading an unknown file. The shots can be played back later to see what happened, if there’s a security incident. Employees are also “risk-scored” and compared to others in the organization, with trends over time mapped out.

Employee privacy is an obvious issue. But at this point, companies seem willing to do whatever it takes to minimize damage, so long as they operate within state and federal laws. “Ten years ago, we heard ‘Big Brother’ all the time,” Friedlander says. “Now there’s none of that.”

Other security companies with related or complementary approaches include CyberArk, Cybereason, Trusteer (part of IBM Security), and AlienVault.

ObserveIT says it has about 1,000 active customers across financial services, healthcare, insurance, and other sectors. Its revenues have grown significantly over the past five years, McKee says, and its sales have been shifting from primarily international to more geographically balanced (about one-third is in North America now). That tracks roughly with the staff’s distribution—about 60 in Tel Aviv, and 40 in Boston.

McKee and Friedlander are convinced that insider threats are the right focus to have in the noisy landscape of security. But McKee acknowledges that his company needs to boost “brand awareness and recognition of what we do.” One challenge is that most customers don’t have a dedicated budget for insider-threat security—they just want better security, period.

Trending on Xconomy

Sun, 26 Jun 2022 12:00:00 -0500 Gregory T. Huang en text/html https://xconomy.com/boston/2016/06/27/observeit-led-by-ex-nhl-defender-looks-to-shut-down-cyber-threats/ Killexams : Next Generation OSS And BSS Market 2021 Huge Demand, Growth Opportunities and Expansion by 2028

The MarketWatch News Department was not involved in the creation of this content.

Aug 03, 2022 (The Expresswire) -- Pre and Post Covid is covered and Report Customization is available.

In the forecast period of 2022-2028, the Global “Next Generation OSS And BSS Market” is expected to grow at a steady rate, according to the Next Generation OSS And BSS Market report, which summarizes the key aspects of the Next Generation OSS And BSS market, as well as the leading key Next Generation OSS And BSS market players, leading regions, and key applications. It contains pages 108 with detailed analysis, which is followed by a table of contents. This Next Generation OSS And BSS market research report focuses on the status and outlook for major applications/end users, consumption (sales), Next Generation OSS And BSS market share, and growth rate for each application and displays the production, revenue, and price. The Next Generation OSS And BSS Market Share Analysis offers the analysis of vendors considering their contribution to the overall market.

Get a sample PDF of the report at -https://www.researchreportsworld.com/enquiry/request-sample/20436448

About Next Generation OSS And BSS market:

These major players operating in this Next Generation OSS And BSSs Market analysis are in strong competition in terms of technology, innovation, product development, and product pricing. The Market study aids in making sales forecasts for its products and thereby, establishing harmonious adjustment between demand and supply of its products.It is helpful in finding out the size of the Market for specific products. Our report on the Next Generation OSS And BSS market provides a holistic analysis, market size and forecast, Market trends, growth drivers, and challenges, as well as vendor analysis covering around 25 vendors.

Qualitative information will discuss the key factors driving the restraining the growth of the market, and the possible growth opportunities of the market, regulatory scenario, value chain and supply chain analysis, export and import analysis, attractive investment proposition, and Porter’s 5 Forces analysis among others will be a part of qualitative information. Further, justification for the estimates for each segments, and regions will also be provided in qualitative form.

On the whole, the report proves to be an effective tool that players can use to gain a competitive edge over their competitors and ensure lasting success in the global Next Generation OSS And BSS market. All of the findings, data, and information provided in the report are validated and revalidated with the help of trustworthy sources. The analysts who have authored the report took a unique and industry-best research and analysis approach for an in-depth study of the global Next Generation OSS And BSS market.

Get a sample copy of the Next Generation OSS And BSS Market Report

List of TOP KEY PLAYERS in Next Generation OSS And BSS Market Report are: -

● Accenture
● Amdocs
● Capgemini SE
● CSG Systems International, Inc.
● Hewlett Packard Enterprise
● Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
● Oracle Corporation
● IBM
● LogNet Systems
● Dorado Software
● Sigma Systems, Inc.

Next Generation OSS And BSS Market Shareby Company Type Report is designed to incorporate both qualify qualitative and quantitative aspects of the industry with respect to each of the regions and countries involved in the study. This report also provides a balanced and detailed analysis of the on-going Next Generation OSS And BSS trends, opportunities/high growth areas, Next Generation OSS And BSS market drivers which would help the investors to device and align their market strategies according to the current and future market dynamics.

The Global Next Generation OSS And BSS Market Share report is provided for the international markets as well as development trends, competitive landscape analysis, and key regions development status. Development policies and plans are discussed as well as manufacturing processes and cost structures are also analyzed. This report additionally states import/export consumption, supply and demand Figures, cost, price, revenue and gross margins.

Enquire before purchasing this report -https://www.researchreportsworld.com/enquiry/pre-order-enquiry/20436448

Global Next Generation OSS And BSSs Market: Segment Analysis
The research report includes specific segments by region (country), by manufacturers, by Type and by Application. Each type provides information about the production during the forecast period of 2016 to 2028. by Application segment also provides consumption during the forecast period of 2016 to 2028. Understanding the segments helps in identifying the importance of different factors that aid the market growth.

By the product type, the market is primarily split into

● Revenue Management ● Service Fulfilment ● Service Assurance ● Customer Management ● Network Management Systems

By the end users/application, this report covers the following segments

● Cable and Satellite ● Fixed and Wireless ● Mobile ● Others

COVID-19 Impact
Report covers Impact of Coronavirus COVID-19: Since the COVID-19 virus outbreak in December 2019, the disease has spread to almost every country around the globe with the World Health Organization declaring it a public health emergency. The global impacts of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are already starting to be felt, and will significantly affect the Next Generation OSS And BSS market in 2020.

To know How COVID-19 Pandemic Will Impact This Market/Industry-Request a sample copy of the report-:https://www.researchreportsworld.com/enquiry/request-covid19/20436448

This Report lets you identify the opportunities in Next Generation OSS And BSS Market by means of a region:

● North America (the United States, Canada and Mexico) ● Europe (Germany, UK, France, Italy, Russia and Turkey, etc.) ● Asia-Pacific (China, Japan, Korea, India, Australia and Southeast Asia (Indonesia, Thailand, Philippines, Malaysia, and Vietnam)) ● South America (Brazil etc.) ● The Middle East and Africa (North Africa and GCC Countries)

Global Next Generation OSS And BSSs Market: Drivers and Restrains
The research report has incorporated the analysis of different factors that augment the market’s growth. It constitutes trends, restraints, and drivers that transform the market in either a positive or negative manner. This section also provides the scope of different segments and applications that can potentially influence the market in the future. The detailed information is based on current trends and historic milestones. This section also provides an analysis of the volume of production about the global market and about each type from 2016 to 2028.

A thorough evaluation of the restrains included in the report portrays the contrast to drivers and gives room for strategic planning. Factors that overshadow the market growth are pivotal as they can be understood to devise different bends for getting hold of the lucrative opportunities that are present in the ever-growing market. Additionally, insights into market expert’s opinions have been taken to understand the market better.

Highlights of the Next Generation OSS And BSS market report are

● A comprehensive evaluation of all opportunities and risks in the Next Generation OSS And BSS market. ● Next Generation OSS And BSS market current developments and significant occasions. ● A deep study of business techniques for the development of the market-driving players. ● Conclusive study about the improvement of the market report for approaching years. ● Top to bottom approach of market-express drivers, targets, and major littler scale markets.

Important Sections from the Table of Contents:

● Global Next Generation OSS And BSS Market Overview ● Economic Impact on Industry ● Next Generation OSS And BSS Market Competition by Manufacturers ● Production, Revenue (Value) by Region ● Supply (Production), Consumption, Export, Import by Regions ● Production, Revenue (Value), Price Trend by Type ● Next Generation OSS And BSS Market Analysis by Application ● Manufacturing Cost Analysis ● Industrial Chain, Sourcing Strategy, and Downstream Buyers ● Marketing Strategy Analysis, Distributors/Traders ● Next Generation OSS And BSS Market Effect Factors Analysis ● Global Next Generation OSS And BSS Market Forecast

Finally, the Next Generation OSS And BSS Market report is the believable source for gaining the market research that will exponentially accelerate your business. The report gives the principle locale, economic situations with the item value, benefit, limit, generation, supply, request and market development rate and figure and so on. Next Generation OSS And BSS industry report additionally Present new task SWOT examination, speculation attainability investigation, and venture return investigation.

Purchase this report (Price 4900 USD for a single-user license) -https://www.researchreportsworld.com/purchase/20436448

Detailed Table of Content of Global Next Generation OSS And BSS Market Research Report 2022

1 Report Business Overview
1.1 Study Scope
1.2 Market Analysis by Type
1.2.1 Global Next Generation OSS And BSS Market Size Growth Rate by Type, 2017 VS 2021 VS 2028
1.2.2 Revenue Management
1.2.3 Service Fulfilment
1.2.4 Service Assurance
1.2.5 Customer Management
1.2.6 Network Management Systems
1.3 Market by Application
1.3.1 Global Next Generation OSS And BSS Market Size Growth Rate by Application, 2017 VS 2021 VS 2028
1.3.2 Cable and Satellite
1.3.3 Fixed and Wireless
1.3.4 Mobile
1.3.5 Others
1.4 Study Objectives
1.5 Years Considered
2 Global Growth Trends
2.1 Global Next Generation OSS And BSS Market Perspective (2017-2028)
2.2 Next Generation OSS And BSS Growth Trends by Region
2.2.1 Next Generation OSS And BSS Market Size by Region: 2017 VS 2021 VS 2028
2.2.2 Next Generation OSS And BSS Historic Market Size by Region (2017-2022)
2.2.3 Next Generation OSS And BSS Forecasted Market Size by Region (2023-2028)
2.3 Next Generation OSS And BSS Market Dynamics
2.3.1 Next Generation OSS And BSS Industry Trends
2.3.2 Next Generation OSS And BSS Market Drivers
2.3.3 Next Generation OSS And BSS Market Challenges
2.3.4 Next Generation OSS And BSS Market Restraints
3 Competition Landscape by Key Players
3.1 Global Top Next Generation OSS And BSS Players by Revenue
3.1.1 Global Top Next Generation OSS And BSS Players by Revenue (2017-2022)
3.1.2 Global Next Generation OSS And BSS Revenue Market Share by Players (2017-2022)
3.2 Global Next Generation OSS And BSS Market Share by Company Type (Tier 1, Tier 2, and Tier 3)
3.3 Players Covered: Ranking by Next Generation OSS And BSS Revenue
3.4 Global Next Generation OSS And BSS Market Concentration Ratio
3.4.1 Global Next Generation OSS And BSS Market Concentration Ratio (CR5 and HHI)
3.4.2 Global Top 10 and Top 5 Companies by Next Generation OSS And BSS Revenue in 2021
3.5 Next Generation OSS And BSS Key Players Head office and Area Served
3.6 Key Players Next Generation OSS And BSS Product Solution and Service
3.7 Date of Enter into Next Generation OSS And BSS Market
3.8 Mergers and Acquisitions, Expansion Plans
4 Next Generation OSS And BSS Breakdown Data by Type
4.1 Global Next Generation OSS And BSS Historic Market Size by Type (2017-2022)
4.2 Global Next Generation OSS And BSS Forecasted Market Size by Type (2023-2028)
5 Next Generation OSS And BSS Breakdown Data by Application
5.1 Global Next Generation OSS And BSS Historic Market Size by Application (2017-2022)
5.2 Global Next Generation OSS And BSS Forecasted Market Size by Application (2023-2028)
6 North America
6.1 North America Next Generation OSS And BSS Market Size (2017-2028)
6.2 North America Next Generation OSS And BSS Market Size by Type
6.2.1 North America Next Generation OSS And BSS Market Size by Type (2017-2022)
6.2.2 North America Next Generation OSS And BSS Market Size by Type (2023-2028)
6.2.3 North America Next Generation OSS And BSS Market Share by Type (2017-2028)
6.3 North America Next Generation OSS And BSS Market Size by Application
6.3.1 North America Next Generation OSS And BSS Market Size by Application (2017-2022)
6.3.2 North America Next Generation OSS And BSS Market Size by Application (2023-2028)
6.3.3 North America Next Generation OSS And BSS Market Share by Application (2017-2028)
6.4 North America Next Generation OSS And BSS Market Size by Country
6.4.1 North America Next Generation OSS And BSS Market Size by Country (2017-2022)
6.4.2 North America Next Generation OSS And BSS Market Size by Country (2023-2028)
6.4.3 United States
6.4.4 Canada
7 Europe
7.1 Europe Next Generation OSS And BSS Market Size (2017-2028)
7.2 Europe Next Generation OSS And BSS Market Size by Type
7.2.1 Europe Next Generation OSS And BSS Market Size by Type (2017-2022)
7.2.2 Europe Next Generation OSS And BSS Market Size by Type (2023-2028)
7.2.3 Europe Next Generation OSS And BSS Market Share by Type (2017-2028)
7.3 Europe Next Generation OSS And BSS Market Size by Application
7.3.1 Europe Next Generation OSS And BSS Market Size by Application (2017-2022)
7.3.2 Europe Next Generation OSS And BSS Market Size by Application (2023-2028)
7.3.3 Europe Next Generation OSS And BSS Market Share by Application (2017-2028)
7.4 Europe Next Generation OSS And BSS Market Size by Country
7.4.1 Europe Next Generation OSS And BSS Market Size by Country (2017-2022)
7.4.2 Europe Next Generation OSS And BSS Market Size by Country (2023-2028)
7.4.3 Germany
7.4.4 France
7.4.5 U.K.
7.4.6 Italy
7.4.7 Russia
7.4.8 Nordic Countries
8 Asia-Pacific
8.1 Asia-Pacific Next Generation OSS And BSS Market Size (2017-2028)
8.2 Asia-Pacific Next Generation OSS And BSS Market Size by Type
8.2.1 Asia-Pacific Next Generation OSS And BSS Market Size by Type (2017-2022)
8.2.2 Asia-Pacific Next Generation OSS And BSS Market Size by Type (2023-2028)
8.2.3 Asia-Pacific Next Generation OSS And BSS Market Share by Type (2017-2028)
8.3 Asia-Pacific Next Generation OSS And BSS Market Size by Application
8.3.1 Asia-Pacific Next Generation OSS And BSS Market Size by Application (2017-2022)
8.3.2 Asia-Pacific Next Generation OSS And BSS Market Size by Application (2023-2028)
8.3.3 Asia-Pacific Next Generation OSS And BSS Market Share by Application (2017-2028)
8.4 Asia-Pacific Next Generation OSS And BSS Market Size by Region
8.4.1 Asia-Pacific Next Generation OSS And BSS Market Size by Region (2017-2022)
8.4.2 Asia-Pacific Next Generation OSS And BSS Market Size by Region (2023-2028)
8.4.3 China
8.4.4 Japan
8.4.5 South Korea
8.4.6 Southeast Asia
8.4.7 India
8.4.8 Australia
9 Latin America
9.1 Latin America Next Generation OSS And BSS Market Size (2017-2028)
9.2 Latin America Next Generation OSS And BSS Market Size by Type
9.2.1 Latin America Next Generation OSS And BSS Market Size by Type (2017-2022)
9.2.2 Latin America Next Generation OSS And BSS Market Size by Type (2023-2028)
9.2.3 Latin America Next Generation OSS And BSS Market Share by Type (2017-2028)
9.3 Latin America Next Generation OSS And BSS Market Size by Application
9.3.1 Latin America Next Generation OSS And BSS Market Size by Application (2017-2022)
9.3.2 Latin America Next Generation OSS And BSS Market Size by Application (2023-2028)
9.3.3 Latin America Next Generation OSS And BSS Market Share by Application (2017-2028)
9.4 Latin America Next Generation OSS And BSS Market Size by Country
9.4.1 Latin America Next Generation OSS And BSS Market Size by Country (2017-2022)
9.4.2 Latin America Next Generation OSS And BSS Market Size by Country (2023-2028)
9.4.3 Mexico
9.4.4 Brazil
10 Middle East and Africa
10.1 Middle East and Africa Next Generation OSS And BSS Market Size (2017-2028)
10.2 Middle East and Africa Next Generation OSS And BSS Market Size by Type
10.2.1 Middle East and Africa Next Generation OSS And BSS Market Size by Type (2017-2022)
10.2.2 Middle East and Africa Next Generation OSS And BSS Market Size by Type (2023-2028)
10.2.3 Middle East and Africa Next Generation OSS And BSS Market Share by Type (2017-2028)
10.3 Middle East and Africa Next Generation OSS And BSS Market Size by Application
10.3.1 Middle East and Africa Next Generation OSS And BSS Market Size by Application (2017-2022)
10.3.2 Middle East and Africa Next Generation OSS And BSS Market Size by Application (2023-2028)
10.3.3 Middle East and Africa Next Generation OSS And BSS Market Share by Application (2017-2028)
10.4 Middle East and Africa Next Generation OSS And BSS Market Size by Country
10.4.1 Middle East and Africa Next Generation OSS And BSS Market Size by Country (2017-2022)
10.4.2 Middle East and Africa Next Generation OSS And BSS Market Size by Country (2023-2028)
10.4.3 Turkey
10.4.4 Saudi Arabia
10.4.5 UAE
11 Key Players Profiles
11.1 Accenture
11.1.1 Accenture Company Details
11.1.2 Accenture Business Overview
11.1.3 Accenture Next Generation OSS And BSS Introduction
11.1.4 Accenture Revenue in Next Generation OSS And BSS Business (2017-2022)
11.1.5 Accenture latest Developments
11.2 Amdocs
11.2.1 Amdocs Company Details
11.2.2 Amdocs Business Overview
11.2.3 Amdocs Next Generation OSS And BSS Introduction
11.2.4 Amdocs Revenue in Next Generation OSS And BSS Business (2017-2022)
11.2.5 Amdocs latest Developments
11.3 Capgemini SE
11.3.1 Capgemini SE Company Details
11.3.2 Capgemini SE Business Overview
11.3.3 Capgemini SE Next Generation OSS And BSS Introduction
11.3.4 Capgemini SE Revenue in Next Generation OSS And BSS Business (2017-2022)
11.3.5 Capgemini SE latest Developments
11.4 CSG Systems International, Inc.
11.4.1 CSG Systems International, Inc. Company Details
11.4.2 CSG Systems International, Inc. Business Overview
11.4.3 CSG Systems International, Inc. Next Generation OSS And BSS Introduction
11.4.4 CSG Systems International, Inc. Revenue in Next Generation OSS And BSS Business (2017-2022)
11.4.5 CSG Systems International, Inc. latest Developments
11.5 Hewlett Packard Enterprise
11.5.1 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company Details
11.5.2 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Business Overview
11.5.3 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Next Generation OSS And BSS Introduction
11.5.4 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Revenue in Next Generation OSS And BSS Business (2017-2022)
11.5.5 Hewlett Packard Enterprise latest Developments
11.6 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
11.6.1 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. Company Details
11.6.2 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. Business Overview
11.6.3 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. Next Generation OSS And BSS Introduction
11.6.4 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. Revenue in Next Generation OSS And BSS Business (2017-2022)
11.6.5 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. latest Developments
11.7 Oracle Corporation
11.7.1 Oracle Corporation Company Details
11.7.2 Oracle Corporation Business Overview
11.7.3 Oracle Corporation Next Generation OSS And BSS Introduction
11.7.4 Oracle Corporation Revenue in Next Generation OSS And BSS Business (2017-2022)
11.7.5 Oracle Corporation latest Developments
11.8 IBM
11.8.1 IBM Company Details
11.8.2 IBM Business Overview
11.8.3 IBM Next Generation OSS And BSS Introduction
11.8.4 IBM Revenue in Next Generation OSS And BSS Business (2017-2022)
11.8.5 IBM latest Developments
11.9 LogNet Systems
11.9.1 LogNet Systems Company Details
11.9.2 LogNet Systems Business Overview
11.9.3 LogNet Systems Next Generation OSS And BSS Introduction
11.9.4 LogNet Systems Revenue in Next Generation OSS And BSS Business (2017-2022)
11.9.5 LogNet Systems latest Developments
11.10 Dorado Software
11.10.1 Dorado Software Company Details
11.10.2 Dorado Software Business Overview
11.10.3 Dorado Software Next Generation OSS And BSS Introduction
11.10.4 Dorado Software Revenue in Next Generation OSS And BSS Business (2017-2022)
11.10.5 Dorado Software latest Developments
11.11 Sigma Systems, Inc.
11.11.1 Sigma Systems, Inc. Company Details
11.11.2 Sigma Systems, Inc. Business Overview
11.11.3 Sigma Systems, Inc. Next Generation OSS And BSS Introduction
11.11.4 Sigma Systems, Inc. Revenue in Next Generation OSS And BSS Business (2017-2022)
11.11.5 Sigma Systems, Inc. latest Developments
12 Analyst's Viewpoints/Conclusions
13 Appendix
13.1 Research Methodology
13.1.1 Methodology/Research Approach
13.1.2 Data Source
13.2 Author Details
13.3 Disclaimer

Browse complete table of contents at -https://www.researchreportsworld.com/TOC/20436448

About Us:

Research Reports Worldis the credible source for gaining the market reports that will provide you with the lead your business needs. At Research Reports World, our objective is providing a platform for many top-notch market research firms worldwide to publish their research reports, as well as helping the decision makers in finding most suitable market research solutions under one roof. Our aim is to provide the best solution that matches the exact customer requirements. This drives us to provide you with custom or syndicated research reports.

Contact Us:

Research Reports World

Phone:

US(+1) 424 253 0807

UK(+44) 203 239 8187

Email:sales@researchreportsworld.com

Website:https://www.researchreportsworld.com/

Top Trending Reports:

Analytics Market Size, Growth Analysis Report, 2022: Global Sales Revenue, Segmentation with Competitive Analysis, Trends, Rising Demands, Covid19 impact by Manufactures, Forecast to 2025

Men's Skincare Products Market Revenue, Status and Outlook 2022 Market by Types, Applications, End Users and Opportunities to 2027

Pill Tracker APP Market Future Growth, Gross Margin, Revenue, Top Manufactures, Industry Analysis, CAGR Value, Business Strategy Forecast to 2027

Viral Vectors and Plasmid DNA Manufacturing Market 2022 Size, share, Growth, Analysis and Demand with Forecast Overview and Scope to 2026

Customer Premise Equipment of 5G (5G CPE) Market Share 2022, Global Size Estimation, Growth Rate, Segmentations, Development History, Scope, Opportunities, Key Players, SWOT Analysis, Forecast to 2028

Press Release Distributed by The Express Wire

To view the original version on The Express Wire visit Next Generation OSS And BSS Market 2021 Huge Demand, Growth Opportunities and Expansion by 2028

COMTEX_411473358/2598/2022-08-03T02:02:55

Is there a problem with this press release? Contact the source provider Comtex at editorial@comtex.com. You can also contact MarketWatch Customer Service via our Customer Center.

The MarketWatch News Department was not involved in the creation of this content.

Tue, 02 Aug 2022 18:02:00 -0500 en-US text/html https://www.marketwatch.com/press-release/next-generation-oss-and-bss-market-2021-huge-demand-growth-opportunities-and-expansion-by-2028-2022-08-03 Killexams : Managed IT Service Providers Market Future Growth and Business Opportunities 2022-2028|Latest Research Report

The MarketWatch News Department was not involved in the creation of this content.

Aug 03, 2022 (The Expresswire) -- Pre and Post Covid is covered and Report Customization is available.

In the forecast period of 2022-2028, the Global “Managed IT Service Providers Market” is expected to grow at a steady rate, according to the Managed IT Service Providers Market report, which summarizes the key aspects of the Managed IT Service Providers market, as well as the leading key Managed IT Service Providers market players, leading regions, and key applications. It contains pages 115 with detailed analysis, which is followed by a table of contents. This Managed IT Service Providers market research report focuses on the status and outlook for major applications/end users, consumption (sales), Managed IT Service Providers market share, and growth rate for each application and displays the production, revenue, and price. The Managed IT Service Providers Market Share Analysis offers the analysis of vendors considering their contribution to the overall market.

Get a sample PDF of the report at -https://www.researchreportsworld.com/enquiry/request-sample/20436419

About Managed IT Service Providers market:

These major players operating in this Managed IT Service Providerss Market analysis are in strong competition in terms of technology, innovation, product development, and product pricing. The Market study aids in making sales forecasts for its products and thereby, establishing harmonious adjustment between demand and supply of its products.It is helpful in finding out the size of the Market for specific products. Our report on the Managed IT Service Providers market provides a holistic analysis, market size and forecast, Market trends, growth drivers, and challenges, as well as vendor analysis covering around 25 vendors.

On the whole, the report proves to be an effective tool that players can use to gain a competitive edge over their competitors and ensure lasting success in the global Managed IT Service Providers market. All of the findings, data, and information provided in the report are validated and revalidated with the help of trustworthy sources. The analysts who have authored the report took a unique and industry-best research and analysis approach for an in-depth study of the global Managed IT Service Providers market.

Get a sample copy of the Managed IT Service Providers Market Report

List of TOP KEY PLAYERS in Managed IT Service Providers Market Report are: -

● Accenture
● IBM
● Cognizant
● HCL Technologies Limited
● Wipro Limited
● Atos
● Infosys Limited
● Tata Consultancy Services (TCS)
● Capgemini
● Fujitsu Limited
● Datapipe
● DXC Technology
● Rackspace Technology
● CDW Corporation
● Larsen and Toubro Infotech(LTI)
● NTT DATA

Managed IT Service Providers Market Shareby Company Type Report is designed to incorporate both qualify qualitative and quantitative aspects of the industry with respect to each of the regions and countries involved in the study. This report also provides a balanced and detailed analysis of the on-going Managed IT Service Providers trends, opportunities/high growth areas, Managed IT Service Providers market drivers which would help the investors to device and align their market strategies according to the current and future market dynamics.

The Global Managed IT Service Providers Market Share report is provided for the international markets as well as development trends, competitive landscape analysis, and key regions development status. Development policies and plans are discussed as well as manufacturing processes and cost structures are also analyzed. This report additionally states import/export consumption, supply and demand Figures, cost, price, revenue and gross margins.

Enquire before purchasing this report -https://www.researchreportsworld.com/enquiry/pre-order-enquiry/20436419

Global Managed IT Service Providerss Market: Segment Analysis
The research report includes specific segments by region (country), by manufacturers, by Type and by Application. Each type provides information about the production during the forecast period of 2016 to 2028. by Application segment also provides consumption during the forecast period of 2016 to 2028. Understanding the segments helps in identifying the importance of different factors that aid the market growth.

By the product type, the market is primarily split into

● Managed Cloud ● Managed Communication ● Managed Mobility ● Managed Security ● Managed Data Center ● Others

By the end users/application, this report covers the following segments

● Medical ● Telecommunication ● BFSI ● Government ● Manufacturing ● Retail ● Others

To know How COVID-19 Pandemic Will Impact This Market/Industry-Request a sample copy of the report-:https://www.researchreportsworld.com/enquiry/request-covid19/20436419

This Report lets you identify the opportunities in Managed IT Service Providers Market by means of a region:

Global Managed IT Service Providerss Market: Drivers and Restrains
The research report has incorporated the analysis of different factors that augment the market’s growth. It constitutes trends, restraints, and drivers that transform the market in either a positive or negative manner. This section also provides the scope of different segments and applications that can potentially influence the market in the future. The detailed information is based on current trends and historic milestones. This section also provides an analysis of the volume of production about the global market and about each type from 2016 to 2028.

Highlights of the Managed IT Service Providers market report are

● A comprehensive evaluation of all opportunities and risks in the Managed IT Service Providers market. ● Managed IT Service Providers market current developments and significant occasions. ● A deep study of business techniques for the development of the market-driving players. ● Conclusive study about the improvement of the market report for approaching years. ● Top to bottom approach of market-express drivers, targets, and major littler scale markets.

Important Sections from the Table of Contents:

● Global Managed IT Service Providers Market Overview ● Economic Impact on Industry ● Managed IT Service Providers Market Competition by Manufacturers ● Production, Revenue (Value) by Region ● Supply (Production), Consumption, Export, Import by Regions ● Production, Revenue (Value), Price Trend by Type ● Managed IT Service Providers Market Analysis by Application ● Manufacturing Cost Analysis ● Industrial Chain, Sourcing Strategy, and Downstream Buyers ● Marketing Strategy Analysis, Distributors/Traders ● Managed IT Service Providers Market Effect Factors Analysis ● Global Managed IT Service Providers Market Forecast

Finally, the Managed IT Service Providers Market report is the believable source for gaining the market research that will exponentially accelerate your business. The report gives the principle locale, economic situations with the item value, benefit, limit, generation, supply, request and market development rate and figure and so on. Managed IT Service Providers industry report additionally Present new task SWOT examination, speculation attainability investigation, and venture return investigation.

Purchase this report (Price 4900 USD for a single-user license) -https://www.researchreportsworld.com/purchase/20436419

Detailed Table of Content of Global Managed IT Service Providers Market Research Report 2022

1 Report Business Overview
1.1 Study Scope
1.2 Market Analysis by Type
1.2.1 Global Managed IT Service Providers Market Size Growth Rate by Type, 2017 VS 2021 VS 2028
1.2.2 Managed Cloud
1.2.3 Managed Communication
1.2.4 Managed Mobility
1.2.5 Managed Security
1.2.6 Managed Data Center
1.2.7 Others
1.3 Market by Application
1.3.1 Global Managed IT Service Providers Market Size Growth Rate by Application, 2017 VS 2021 VS 2028
1.3.2 Medical
1.3.3 Telecommunication
1.3.4 BFSI
1.3.5 Government
1.3.6 Manufacturing
1.3.7 Retail
1.3.8 Others
1.4 Study Objectives
1.5 Years Considered
2 Global Growth Trends
2.1 Global Managed IT Service Providers Market Perspective (2017-2028)
2.2 Managed IT Service Providers Growth Trends by Region
2.2.1 Managed IT Service Providers Market Size by Region: 2017 VS 2021 VS 2028
2.2.2 Managed IT Service Providers Historic Market Size by Region (2017-2022)
2.2.3 Managed IT Service Providers Forecasted Market Size by Region (2023-2028)
2.3 Managed IT Service Providers Market Dynamics
2.3.1 Managed IT Service Providers Industry Trends
2.3.2 Managed IT Service Providers Market Drivers
2.3.3 Managed IT Service Providers Market Challenges
2.3.4 Managed IT Service Providers Market Restraints
3 Competition Landscape by Key Players
3.1 Global Top Managed IT Service Providers Players by Revenue
3.1.1 Global Top Managed IT Service Providers Players by Revenue (2017-2022)
3.1.2 Global Managed IT Service Providers Revenue Market Share by Players (2017-2022)
3.2 Global Managed IT Service Providers Market Share by Company Type (Tier 1, Tier 2, and Tier 3)
3.3 Players Covered: Ranking by Managed IT Service Providers Revenue
3.4 Global Managed IT Service Providers Market Concentration Ratio
3.4.1 Global Managed IT Service Providers Market Concentration Ratio (CR5 and HHI)
3.4.2 Global Top 10 and Top 5 Companies by Managed IT Service Providers Revenue in 2021
3.5 Managed IT Service Providers Key Players Head office and Area Served
3.6 Key Players Managed IT Service Providers Product Solution and Service
3.7 Date of Enter into Managed IT Service Providers Market
3.8 Mergers and Acquisitions, Expansion Plans
4 Managed IT Service Providers Breakdown Data by Type
4.1 Global Managed IT Service Providers Historic Market Size by Type (2017-2022)
4.2 Global Managed IT Service Providers Forecasted Market Size by Type (2023-2028)
5 Managed IT Service Providers Breakdown Data by Application
5.1 Global Managed IT Service Providers Historic Market Size by Application (2017-2022)
5.2 Global Managed IT Service Providers Forecasted Market Size by Application (2023-2028)
6 North America
6.1 North America Managed IT Service Providers Market Size (2017-2028)
6.2 North America Managed IT Service Providers Market Size by Type
6.2.1 North America Managed IT Service Providers Market Size by Type (2017-2022)
6.2.2 North America Managed IT Service Providers Market Size by Type (2023-2028)
6.2.3 North America Managed IT Service Providers Market Share by Type (2017-2028)
6.3 North America Managed IT Service Providers Market Size by Application
6.3.1 North America Managed IT Service Providers Market Size by Application (2017-2022)
6.3.2 North America Managed IT Service Providers Market Size by Application (2023-2028)
6.3.3 North America Managed IT Service Providers Market Share by Application (2017-2028)
6.4 North America Managed IT Service Providers Market Size by Country
6.4.1 North America Managed IT Service Providers Market Size by Country (2017-2022)
6.4.2 North America Managed IT Service Providers Market Size by Country (2023-2028)
6.4.3 United States
6.4.4 Canada
7 Europe
7.1 Europe Managed IT Service Providers Market Size (2017-2028)
7.2 Europe Managed IT Service Providers Market Size by Type
7.2.1 Europe Managed IT Service Providers Market Size by Type (2017-2022)
7.2.2 Europe Managed IT Service Providers Market Size by Type (2023-2028)
7.2.3 Europe Managed IT Service Providers Market Share by Type (2017-2028)
7.3 Europe Managed IT Service Providers Market Size by Application
7.3.1 Europe Managed IT Service Providers Market Size by Application (2017-2022)
7.3.2 Europe Managed IT Service Providers Market Size by Application (2023-2028)
7.3.3 Europe Managed IT Service Providers Market Share by Application (2017-2028)
7.4 Europe Managed IT Service Providers Market Size by Country
7.4.1 Europe Managed IT Service Providers Market Size by Country (2017-2022)
7.4.2 Europe Managed IT Service Providers Market Size by Country (2023-2028)
7.4.3 Germany
7.4.4 France
7.4.5 U.K.
7.4.6 Italy
7.4.7 Russia
7.4.8 Nordic Countries
8 Asia-Pacific
8.1 Asia-Pacific Managed IT Service Providers Market Size (2017-2028)
8.2 Asia-Pacific Managed IT Service Providers Market Size by Type
8.2.1 Asia-Pacific Managed IT Service Providers Market Size by Type (2017-2022)
8.2.2 Asia-Pacific Managed IT Service Providers Market Size by Type (2023-2028)
8.2.3 Asia-Pacific Managed IT Service Providers Market Share by Type (2017-2028)
8.3 Asia-Pacific Managed IT Service Providers Market Size by Application
8.3.1 Asia-Pacific Managed IT Service Providers Market Size by Application (2017-2022)
8.3.2 Asia-Pacific Managed IT Service Providers Market Size by Application (2023-2028)
8.3.3 Asia-Pacific Managed IT Service Providers Market Share by Application (2017-2028)
8.4 Asia-Pacific Managed IT Service Providers Market Size by Region
8.4.1 Asia-Pacific Managed IT Service Providers Market Size by Region (2017-2022)
8.4.2 Asia-Pacific Managed IT Service Providers Market Size by Region (2023-2028)
8.4.3 China
8.4.4 Japan
8.4.5 South Korea
8.4.6 Southeast Asia
8.4.7 India
8.4.8 Australia
9 Latin America
9.1 Latin America Managed IT Service Providers Market Size (2017-2028)
9.2 Latin America Managed IT Service Providers Market Size by Type
9.2.1 Latin America Managed IT Service Providers Market Size by Type (2017-2022)
9.2.2 Latin America Managed IT Service Providers Market Size by Type (2023-2028)
9.2.3 Latin America Managed IT Service Providers Market Share by Type (2017-2028)
9.3 Latin America Managed IT Service Providers Market Size by Application
9.3.1 Latin America Managed IT Service Providers Market Size by Application (2017-2022)
9.3.2 Latin America Managed IT Service Providers Market Size by Application (2023-2028)
9.3.3 Latin America Managed IT Service Providers Market Share by Application (2017-2028)
9.4 Latin America Managed IT Service Providers Market Size by Country
9.4.1 Latin America Managed IT Service Providers Market Size by Country (2017-2022)
9.4.2 Latin America Managed IT Service Providers Market Size by Country (2023-2028)
9.4.3 Mexico
9.4.4 Brazil
10 Middle East and Africa
10.1 Middle East and Africa Managed IT Service Providers Market Size (2017-2028)
10.2 Middle East and Africa Managed IT Service Providers Market Size by Type
10.2.1 Middle East and Africa Managed IT Service Providers Market Size by Type (2017-2022)
10.2.2 Middle East and Africa Managed IT Service Providers Market Size by Type (2023-2028)
10.2.3 Middle East and Africa Managed IT Service Providers Market Share by Type (2017-2028)
10.3 Middle East and Africa Managed IT Service Providers Market Size by Application
10.3.1 Middle East and Africa Managed IT Service Providers Market Size by Application (2017-2022)
10.3.2 Middle East and Africa Managed IT Service Providers Market Size by Application (2023-2028)
10.3.3 Middle East and Africa Managed IT Service Providers Market Share by Application (2017-2028)
10.4 Middle East and Africa Managed IT Service Providers Market Size by Country
10.4.1 Middle East and Africa Managed IT Service Providers Market Size by Country (2017-2022)
10.4.2 Middle East and Africa Managed IT Service Providers Market Size by Country (2023-2028)
10.4.3 Turkey
10.4.4 Saudi Arabia
10.4.5 UAE
11 Key Players Profiles
11.1 Accenture
11.1.1 Accenture Company Details
11.1.2 Accenture Business Overview
11.1.3 Accenture Managed IT Service Providers Introduction
11.1.4 Accenture Revenue in Managed IT Service Providers Business (2017-2022)
11.1.5 Accenture latest Developments
11.2 IBM
11.2.1 IBM Company Details
11.2.2 IBM Business Overview
11.2.3 IBM Managed IT Service Providers Introduction
11.2.4 IBM Revenue in Managed IT Service Providers Business (2017-2022)
11.2.5 IBM latest Developments
11.3 Cognizant
11.3.1 Cognizant Company Details
11.3.2 Cognizant Business Overview
11.3.3 Cognizant Managed IT Service Providers Introduction
11.3.4 Cognizant Revenue in Managed IT Service Providers Business (2017-2022)
11.3.5 Cognizant latest Developments
11.4 HCL Technologies Limited
11.4.1 HCL Technologies Limited Company Details
11.4.2 HCL Technologies Limited Business Overview
11.4.3 HCL Technologies Limited Managed IT Service Providers Introduction
11.4.4 HCL Technologies Limited Revenue in Managed IT Service Providers Business (2017-2022)
11.4.5 HCL Technologies Limited latest Developments
11.5 Wipro Limited
11.5.1 Wipro Limited Company Details
11.5.2 Wipro Limited Business Overview
11.5.3 Wipro Limited Managed IT Service Providers Introduction
11.5.4 Wipro Limited Revenue in Managed IT Service Providers Business (2017-2022)
11.5.5 Wipro Limited latest Developments
11.6 Atos
11.6.1 Atos Company Details
11.6.2 Atos Business Overview
11.6.3 Atos Managed IT Service Providers Introduction
11.6.4 Atos Revenue in Managed IT Service Providers Business (2017-2022)
11.6.5 Atos latest Developments
11.7 Infosys Limited
11.7.1 Infosys Limited Company Details
11.7.2 Infosys Limited Business Overview
11.7.3 Infosys Limited Managed IT Service Providers Introduction
11.7.4 Infosys Limited Revenue in Managed IT Service Providers Business (2017-2022)
11.7.5 Infosys Limited latest Developments
11.8 Tata Consultancy Services (TCS)
11.8.1 Tata Consultancy Services (TCS) Company Details
11.8.2 Tata Consultancy Services (TCS) Business Overview
11.8.3 Tata Consultancy Services (TCS) Managed IT Service Providers Introduction
11.8.4 Tata Consultancy Services (TCS) Revenue in Managed IT Service Providers Business (2017-2022)
11.8.5 Tata Consultancy Services (TCS) latest Developments
11.9 Capgemini
11.9.1 Capgemini Company Details
11.9.2 Capgemini Business Overview
11.9.3 Capgemini Managed IT Service Providers Introduction
11.9.4 Capgemini Revenue in Managed IT Service Providers Business (2017-2022)
11.9.5 Capgemini latest Developments
11.10 Fujitsu Limited
11.10.1 Fujitsu Limited Company Details
11.10.2 Fujitsu Limited Business Overview
11.10.3 Fujitsu Limited Managed IT Service Providers Introduction
11.10.4 Fujitsu Limited Revenue in Managed IT Service Providers Business (2017-2022)
11.10.5 Fujitsu Limited latest Developments
11.11 Datapipe
11.11.1 Datapipe Company Details
11.11.2 Datapipe Business Overview
11.11.3 Datapipe Managed IT Service Providers Introduction
11.11.4 Datapipe Revenue in Managed IT Service Providers Business (2017-2022)
11.11.5 Datapipe latest Developments
11.12 DXC Technology
11.12.1 DXC Technology Company Details
11.12.2 DXC Technology Business Overview
11.12.3 DXC Technology Managed IT Service Providers Introduction
11.12.4 DXC Technology Revenue in Managed IT Service Providers Business (2017-2022)
11.12.5 DXC Technology latest Developments
11.13 Rackspace Technology
11.13.1 Rackspace Technology Company Details
11.13.2 Rackspace Technology Business Overview
11.13.3 Rackspace Technology Managed IT Service Providers Introduction
11.13.4 Rackspace Technology Revenue in Managed IT Service Providers Business (2017-2022)
11.13.5 Rackspace Technology latest Developments
11.14 CDW Corporation
11.14.1 CDW Corporation Company Details
11.14.2 CDW Corporation Business Overview
11.14.3 CDW Corporation Managed IT Service Providers Introduction
11.14.4 CDW Corporation Revenue in Managed IT Service Providers Business (2017-2022)
11.14.5 CDW Corporation latest Developments
11.15 Larsen and Toubro Infotech(LTI)
11.15.1 Larsen and Toubro Infotech(LTI) Company Details
11.15.2 Larsen and Toubro Infotech(LTI) Business Overview
11.15.3 Larsen and Toubro Infotech(LTI) Managed IT Service Providers Introduction
11.15.4 Larsen and Toubro Infotech(LTI) Revenue in Managed IT Service Providers Business (2017-2022)
11.15.5 Larsen and Toubro Infotech(LTI) latest Developments
11.16 NTT DATA
11.16.1 NTT DATA Company Details
11.16.2 NTT DATA Business Overview
11.16.3 NTT DATA Managed IT Service Providers Introduction
11.16.4 NTT DATA Revenue in Managed IT Service Providers Business (2017-2022)
11.16.5 NTT DATA latest Developments
12 Analyst's Viewpoints/Conclusions
13 Appendix
13.1 Research Methodology
13.1.1 Methodology/Research Approach
13.1.2 Data Source
13.2 Author Details
13.3 Disclaimer

Browse complete table of contents at -https://www.researchreportsworld.com/TOC/20436419

About Us:

Contact Us:

Research Reports World

Phone:

US(+1) 424 253 0807

UK(+44) 203 239 8187

Email:sales@researchreportsworld.com

Website:https://www.researchreportsworld.com/

Top Trending Reports:

Surface Inspection Market Size, Growth Analysis Report, 2022: Global Sales Revenue, Segmentation with Competitive Analysis, Trends, Rising Demands, Covid19 impact by Manufactures, Forecast to 2025

Indoor Sports Flooring Market 2022 Size, share, Growth, Analysis and Demand with Forecast Overview and Scope to 2026

Casino Management Software Market with Top Leading Companies, Industry Analysis, CAGR Value, Business Outlook Forecast to 2027

Mixed Reality Market 2022 to 2026: COVID-19 Impact and Global Analysis, Latest Developments, Trends and Demand, Analysis, latest Trends and Regional Growth

5G in Gaming Market 2022 Business Scenario | Top Factors that Will Boost the 5G in Gaming Market Trend

Press Release Distributed by The Express Wire

To view the original version on The Express Wire visit Managed IT Service Providers Market Future Growth and Business Opportunities 2022-2028|Latest Research Report

COMTEX_411473970/2598/2022-08-03T02:09:57

Is there a problem with this press release? Contact the source provider Comtex at editorial@comtex.com. You can also contact MarketWatch Customer Service via our Customer Center.

The MarketWatch News Department was not involved in the creation of this content.

Tue, 02 Aug 2022 18:09:00 -0500 en-US text/html https://www.marketwatch.com/press-release/managed-it-service-providers-market-future-growth-and-business-opportunities-2022-2028latest-research-report-2022-08-03 Killexams : Chase Corporation Appoints Ellen Rubin to its Board of Directors

WESTWOOD, Mass., July 20, 2022--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Chase Corporation (NYSE American: CCF), a global specialty chemicals company that is a leading manufacturer of protective materials for high-reliability applications across diverse market sectors, announced on July 14, 2022 that the Board of Directors elected Ellen Rubin to the Board, as an independent director, effective immediately. Additionally, she will serve as a member of Chase’s Audit Committee.

Peter Chase, Chairman of the Board, commented "We are thrilled to be adding Ellen Rubin’s leadership, industry knowledge, and expertise to our Board of Directors as we continue to expand our business, drive scale, and deliver against our proven growth strategy. Ms. Rubin brings to our Board an extensive leadership background and CEO experience which she gained while scaling startups, including ClearSky Data and CloudSwitch, and as a General Manager at Amazon Web Services, which operate within the growing area of cloud computing. Ms. Rubin’s proven leadership and knowledge within the information technology space render success, and we look forward to her contribution within our Board of Directors."

Dana Mohler-Faria, Independent Director and Chair of the Nominating Governance Committee, commented, "Ms. Rubin’s unique experience serving as CEO and Founder across multiple innovation-based organizations and hands-on capital markets activity and acquisition experience are well-aligned with Chase’s strategy and will strengthen our Board’s perspective and acumen. We look forward to working alongside Ms. Rubin on our Board of Directors."

"I’m excited to join the Chase Corporation brand during its time of growth and expansion, especially with the latest NuCera acquisition," Ms. Rubin said, "Chase’s market-leading products are at the core of many global industries emerging technologies, and I share the Company’s commitment to make a material difference for our customers and partners."

About Chase Corporation

Cautionary Note Concerning Forward-Looking Statements

Certain statements in our press releases are forward-looking. These may be identified by the use of forward-looking words or phrases including, but not limited to, "believe," "expect," "anticipate," "should," "planned," "estimated", "growth", "expansion" and "potential." The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a "safe harbor" for such forward-looking statements. To comply with the terms of the safe harbor, the Company cautions investors that any forward-looking statements made by the Company are not guarantees of future performance and that a variety of factors could cause the Company’s genuine results and experience to differ materially from the anticipated results or other expectations expressed in the Company’s forward-looking statements. The risks and uncertainties which may affect the operations, performance, development and results of the Company’s business include, but are not limited to, the following: uncertainties relating to the timing of the acquisition and receipt of required regulatory approvals; the risk that the businesses involved in the acquisition will not be integrated successfully or that such integration may be more difficult, time-consuming or costly than expected; the risk that expected revenue synergies and cost savings from the transaction may not be fully realized or realized within the expected time frame; the risk that revenues following the acquisition may be lower than expected; uncertainties relating to operating costs, potential customer loss and business disruption following the transaction, including, without limitation, the risk that difficulties in maintaining relationships with employees, may be greater than expected; uncertainties relating to economic conditions including inflation; uncertainties relating to customer plans and commitments; the pricing and availability of equipment, materials and inventories; technological developments; performance issues with suppliers and subcontractors; economic growth; delays in testing of new products; the effectiveness of cost-reduction plans; rapid technology changes; the highly competitive environment in which the Company operates; as well as expected impact of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic on the Company’s businesses. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date the statement was made. The Company does not assume any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statement made in this release or that may from time to time be made by or on behalf of the Company. Additional information regarding the factors that may cause genuine results to differ materially from these forward-looking statements is available in the Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the risks and uncertainties identified in Part I, Item 1A – Risk Factors of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended August 31, 2021.

View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20220720006035/en/

Contacts

Investor & Media Contact:
Michael Cummings or Jackie Marcus
Alpha IR Group
Phone: (617) 982-0475
E-mail: CCF@alpha-ir.com

Shareholder & Investor Relations Department
Phone: (781) 332-0700
E-mail: investorrelations@chasecorp.com
Website: www.chasecorp.com

Wed, 20 Jul 2022 02:23:00 -0500 en-CA text/html https://ca.news.yahoo.com/chase-corporation-appoints-ellen-rubin-212300295.html M2090-234 exam dump and training guide direct download
Training Exams List

No more exam failing with M2090-234 Actual Questions by killexams.com

Trending on Xconomy

What is a data lake solution?

5 must-have features of a data lake solution

1. Various interfaces, APIs and endpoints

2. Support for or connection to processing and analytics layers

3. Robust search and cataloging features

4. Security and access control

5. Flexibility and scalability

Top 10 data lake solution vendors in 2022

1. Amazon Web Services (AWS)

2. Cloudera

3. Databricks

4. Domo

5. Google Cloud

6. HP Enterprise

7. IBM

8. Microsoft Azure

9. Oracle

10. Snowflake

The importance of choosing the right data lake solution vendor

Trending on Xconomy