A RAM scraping attack is an intrusion into the random access memory (RAM) of a retail sales terminal in order to steal consumer credit card information. This type of cybercrime has plagued retailers and their customers since at least 2008.
RAM scraping is also called a point-of-sale (POS) attack because the target is a terminal used to process retail transactions.
The first known RAM scraping attack was reported in an alert issued by the credit card company Visa Inc. in October 2008. The company's security team discovered that point-of-sale (POS) terminals used to process customer transactions using its cards had been accessed by hackers. The hackers had been able to obtain unencrypted customer information from the RAM in the terminals.
The targets of the earliest attacks were mostly in the hospitality and retail industries, which process high volumes of credit card transactions at a large number of locations. By 2011, investigators were tracking an uptick in the introduction of malware bugs.
S attacks did not gain widespread attention until 2013 and 2014 when hackers infiltrated the networks of the Target and Home Depot retail chains. The personal information of more than 40 million Target customers and 56 million Home Depot customers was stolen in those attacks, which were attributed to the use of a new spyware program known as BlackPOS.
The attacks continue, although RAM scrapers are now being replaced with more advanced types of malware such as screen grabbers and keystroke loggers. These are exactly what they sound like. They are malware programs designed to capture personal information when it is displayed or as it is entered and then transmit it to a third party.
The plastic credit cards that we all carry contain two distinct sets of information.
Screen grabbers and keystroke loggers are newer ways to steal credit card data.
The POS terminal collects all of the data in that first set, and sometimes the second code as well. The data is then held in the memory of that POS machine until it is periodically purged.
As long as it is in temporary storage on the terminal, that information is vulnerable to RAM scrapers.
Small merchants are a relatively easy target for cybercriminals since they can't devote a lot of resources to elaborate security systems. Larger retailers like Target and Home Depot are far more attractive because of the massive amounts of data they retain at any given time.
Thwarting RAM scraping is mostly the job of the retailer, not the consumer. Luckily, a good deal of progress has been made since the infamous attacks on Home Depot and Target.
Your credit card issuers have by now almost certainly sent you a new card that is inserted into a retailer's card reader rather than swiped along the side of it. The reader uses the chip embedded in the card rather than the older magnetic stripe. The purpose of this technology is to make a POS attack more difficult.
Contactless payment by credit card is considered as safe as "dipping" a card. These are not yet universally accepted by retailers (or enabled by card issuers) but are increasingly an option.
It took a long while for this switch to be fully put in place nationwide because it required every retailer who used the new system to buy new equipment in order to enable it. If you run across a retailer who still uses the old swipe readers, you might consider paying cash instead.
The ID of the backup image to use to create the parameters file to restore a VMware virtual machine disk or disks, in clientname_backuptime format. The backuptime is the decimal number of seconds since January 1, 1970.
Use this option with the -restorespecout option. Do not combine it with the -s or -e option.
Contacts the BMR server to carry out tasks related to virtual machine creation from client backup.
The name of the virtual machine as identified in the backup. For example, if the policy backed up the virtual machine by its host name, specify that host name.
To restore to a different location, use the -vmserver and -R options.
Specifies the BMR configuration name. The default name is current
. Applies only to the BMR VM conversion.
Specifies the copy number to restore from for a vSphere Restore operation. This option allows a restore from a copy other than the primary copy. For example, -copy 3 restores copy 3 of the backup image.
This option is only supported for a full backup of a VMware virtual machine. If the specified copy number does not exist, the primary copy is used.
Specifies which media server performs the Instant Recovery.
This option is useful if NetBackup storage is configured over several media servers, such as for load balancing. Without the -disk_media_server option, the Instant Recovery job may select any of the available media servers to do the restore. If only one of the media servers is configured for Instant Recovery, specify that server with the -disk_media_server option.
Suppresses the confirmation prompts.
Starts the Instant Recovery of the specified virtual machine. For VMware, the command mounts the backup image as an NFS datastore. The virtual machine is instantly recovered when the virtual machine data is accessible on the VM host.
Deletes the specified restored virtual machine from the ESX host and releases the NetBackup media server resources. The -force option suppresses the confirmation prompts.
Completes the virtual machine instant recovery job after the data is migrated. It removes the NetBackup storage and releases the media server resources. The NetBackup storage is the datastore that is mounted on the ESX host.
Lists details about the virtual machines that are activated by instant recovery.
Reactivates a restored virtual machine by remounting the NetBackup NFS datastore. It also registers the restored virtual machines on the ESX host from the temporary datastore on the ESX host.
ir_identifier is the virtual machine's numeric identifier from the -ir_listvm output.
The -force option suppresses the confirmation prompts.
Restarts an interrupted instant recovery job for all virtual machines on the ESX host and NetBackup media server combination.
Specifies the name of an existing file in which to write progress information. This option applies to vSphere restore and Hyper-V restore.
Only default paths are allowed for this option and Veritas recommends to use the default paths. If you cannot use the NetBackup default path in your setup, you should add custom paths to the NetBackup configuration. The following are the default paths:
UNIX systems: /usr/openv/netbackup/logs/user_ops/proglog
Windows systems: install_path\NetBackup\logs\user_ops\proglog
For more information on how to add a custom path, see the "BPCD_ALLOWED_PATH option for NetBackup servers and clients" syllabu in the NetBackup Administrator's Guide, Volume I.
Specifies the media server on which the NFS datastores that contain the backup images were mounted when you reactivate virtual machines. This option is used only with the -ir_reactivate_all function.
Overwrites the VMs and associated resources if they already exist with the same name. The resources are entities such as virtual machine disk format files (VMDKs) that explicitly belong to the existing VM. If -O is specified, the VMware server is requested to remove the VM before the VM is restored. If not specified, the restore may fail. This option is used with the VClient restore, the Hyper-V restore, and the BMR VM conversion.
Specifies an absolute directory path to a rename file, which is used to restore a VMware virtual machine. The rename file indicates that the restore is to be redirected to an alternate location and specifies details about the alternate client location. For VMware, the rename file can include any of the following entries:
change /first_vmdk_path to /new_first_vmdk_path change /second_vmdk_path to /new_second_vmdk_path ... change /n'th_vmdk_path to /new_nth_vmdk_path change vmname to NEW_VM_NAME change esxhost to NEW_ESX_HOST change datacenter to NEW_DATACENTER change folder to NEW_FOLDER change resourcepool to NEW_RESOURCEPOOL change datastore to NEW_DATASTORE change network to NEW_NETWORK change organization to NEW_ORGANIZATION change orgvdc to NEW_ORGVDC change vcdserver to NEW_VCDSERVER change vcdvapp to NEW_VCDVAPP change vcdvapptemplate to NEW_VCDVAPPTEMPLATE change vcdvmname to NEW_VCDVMNAME change vcdcatalog to NEW_VCDCATALOG
Instant Recovery uses the following subset of this list:
change vmname to NEW_VM_NAME change esxhost to NEW_ESX_HOST change resourcepool to NEW_RESOURCEPOOL change network to NEW_NETWORK
The following are notes regarding these entries:
Enter the change line exactly as it appears in this list, except for the variable at the end (shown in all caps).
Each change line must end with a carriage return. If the rename_file contains only one entry, make sure that the end of the line contains a carriage return.
If the rename file has no contents, the restore uses default values from the backup image.
Use change datastore to NEW_DATASTORE to identify the target datastore when you restore from backups that are not made with Replication Director.
The rename file must be in UTF-8 character encoding.
With NetBackup 7.7.2 and later, only default paths are allowed for this option and Veritas recommends to use the default paths. If you cannot use the NetBackup default path in your setup, you should add custom paths to the NetBackup configuration.
For more information on how to add a custom path, see the "BPCD_ALLOWED_PATH option for NetBackup servers and clients" syllabu in the NetBackup Administrator's Guide, Volume I.
Creates a new virtual machine and restores the NetBackup client and disks that you specify in the filename to the new VM. A special case that is called In-place Disk Restore replaces all disks of an existing VM with the data in its backup. RDM and independent disks are not replaced or deleted. For In-place Disk Restore, the disks are restored to the same disk controller configuration that is acquired at the time of backup. The filename is a text file that uses the JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) format.
The text file must be in UTF-8 character encoding.
You can use the -restorespecout option to create the JSON-formatted text file. You can edit the text file so that it contains only the virtual machine disks that you want to restore.
The following is an example of the restore parameters that the -restorespec option requires:
{ "ClientType": "VMware", "ClientName": "VM-client-name", "RestoreType": "SelectiveDiskRestore", "BackupImageSelection": { "MasterServer": "Master-server-name", "StartDate": "mm/dd/yy hh:mm:ss", "EndDate": "mm/dd/yy hh:mm:ss", "BackupId": "clientname_timestamp" }, "VMwareRestoreParameters": { "vCenterServer": "vCenter-name-for-restore", "VMwareRecoveryHost": "Recovery-host-name", "DefaultDiskProvisioning": "thin", "TransportMode": "san:hotadd:nbd", "VMwareVirtualMachineDestination": { "VMName": "Restore-vm-name", "AttachDisksToExistingVM": "No", "PowerOn": "No", "Datacenter": "Path-of-Datacenter-for-destination-vm", "ESX": "Hostname-of-the-ESX-host", "Folder": "Path-to-destination-VM-folder", "ResourcePool/Vapp": "Path-of-vApp-or-resource-pool-destination", "VmxDatastore": "" }, "VMwareVirtualDiskDestination": [ { "VirtualDisk" : "/DS1/BackedupVM/BackedupVM.vmdk", "OverwriteExistingDisk": "No", "Datastore": "[Datastore-name]", "Path": "", "Provisioning": "thin" "Controller": "scsi0-0" }, { "VirtualDisk": "/DS2/BackedupVM/BackedupVM_1.vmdk", "OverwriteExistingDisk": "No", "Datastore": "", "Path": "[datastore_name] MyVm/MyVM_1.vmdk", "Provisioning": "eagerzeroed" "Controller": "scsi0-1" } ] "VMwareAdvancedRestoreOptions": { "DeleteRestoredVMOnError": "No", "VMShutdownWaitSeconds": 900 } } }
The following is an example of the restore parameters that the -restorespec option requires for In-place Disk Restore:
{ "BackupImageSelection": { "StartDate": "05/03/20 21:50:34", "BackupId": "bptesx60l-19vm1.rmnus.sen.symantec.com_1588560634", "EndDate": "05/03/20 21:50:34", "MasterServer": "bptms-lnr73-0029" }, "ClientName": "bptesx60l-19vm1.rmnus.sen.symantec.com", "VMwareRestoreParameters": { "vmdk_compression": "none", "VMwareAdvancedRestoreOptions": { "VMShutdownWaitSeconds": 900, "DeleteRestoredVMOnError": "No" }, "VMwareRecoveryHost": "bptms-lnr73-0029", "VMwareVirtualMachineDestination": { "ResourcePool/Vapp": "/New Datacenter/host/Test01/Resources", "VmxDatastore": "datastore1", "Datacenter": "/New Datacenter", "AttachDisksToExistingVM": "DeleteAllDisksAndReplace", "ESX": "bptesx60l-19.rmnus.sen.symantec.com", "VMName": "bptesx60l-19vm1", "Folder": "/New Datacenter/vm/", "PowerOn": "Yes" }, "DefaultDiskProvisioning": "unknown", "TransportMode": "nbdssl", "VMwareVirtualDiskDestination": [], "vCenterServer": "bptesx60l-19vc" }, "ClientType": "VMware", "RestoreType": "SelectiveDiskRestore" }
The following itemized lists describe the five sections of the filename. The optional sections or optional fields that you do not want to use must be omitted from the filename.
First section (required): The opening section of the filename provides the required information about the client that contains the disks that you want to restore.
ClientType. The client type as configured in the backup policy. Required.
For Vmware virtual machine disk restore, use VMware
ClientName. The client name as configured in the backup policy. Required.
RestoreType. The type of restore. Required.
For Vmware virtual machine disk restore, use SelectiveDiskRestore.
Second section (optional): The BackupImageSelection section of the filename specifies the information required to identify the backup image to restore. If this section is not specified, NetBackup restores from the most exact backup. The following are the fields that describe the BackupImageSelection:
MasterServer. The fully-qualified domain name of the NetBackup master server to use to query the VM details. Optional.
If not specified, the master server that is specified in the NetBackup configuration is used.
StartDate. The start date to look for backup images, in mm/dd/yy hh:mm:ss format. If more than one backup image exits in the date range, NetBackup selects the most exact backup. Optional.
If not specified, the start date is 6 months earlier than the current date.
EndDate. The end date to look for backup images, in mm/dd/yy hh:mm:ss format. If more than one backup image exits in the date range, NetBackup selects the most exact backup. Optional.
If not specified, NetBackup uses the current date.
BackupId. The ID of the backup image to use for the restore, in clientname_backuptime format. The backuptime is the decimal number of seconds since January 1, 1970. Optional.
If not specified, NetBackup uses the most exact backup image. If you specify a StartDate, EndDate, and a valid BackupId, NetBackup restores from the BackupId image.
Third section (required): The VMwareRestoreParameters section of the filename specifies the VMware attributes of the virtual disk to be restored. All of the fields in this section are optional; however, the section is required because it also contains two required subsections. The following are the fields that describe the VMwareRestoreParameters:
vCenterServer. The host name of the destination vCenter for the restore, in the same format as specified in the credentials. Optional.
To restore to a standalone ESXi hypervisor when the backup was through a vCenter, the value of this field must be None.
VMwareRecoveryHost. The host that performs the restore. Optional.
If not specified, NetBackup uses the backup host value from the backup image.
DefaultDiskProvisioning. The default disk provisioning for all of the disks to be created in the restore VM: thin, thick, eagerzeroed, or unknown. Optional.
For each disk, you can override this default by specifying a different Provisioning value in the VMwareVirtualDiskDestination section of the filename.
If neither DefaultDiskProvisioning or Provisioning are specified, NetBackup uses the provisioning as specified in the backup.
TransportMode. The transport mode combination to use for the restore as specified in lowercase, colon separated values: hotadd:nbd:nbdssl:san. The order of the specification is significant; NetBackup attempts each method in turn until the restore succeeds. If all methods fail, the restore fails. Optional.
If not specified, NetBackup uses the transport mode combination that was used for the backup.
Fourth section (required): The VMwareVirtualMachineDestination section of the filename specifies the destination parameters for the restore. This section is subordinate to the VMwareRestoreParameters section. It contains the following fields:
VMName. The unique display name of the new virtual machine for the restored disk or disks. The nbrestorevm command adds a timestamp to the name of the original VM client when it populates this field. The timestamp is the decimal number of seconds since January 1, 1970. Required.
NetBackup restores the virtual machine disks to a new VM. Therefore, if this name conflicts with an existing display name, the restore fails.
AttachDisksToExistingVM. Determines whether to restore the selected VMDKs to: an existing VM, a new VM, or replace all the VMDKs on an existing VM as follows:
If the value is Yes, the VM specified in the VMName field must exist in the target vCenter or ESX server. If it does not exist, the restore fails with status code 2820.
If the value is No, the VM specified in the VMName field must not exit in the target vCenter or ESX server. If it exists, the restore fails with status code 2820.
If the value is DeleteAllDisksAndReplace, the VM specified in the VMName field must exist in the target vCenter or ESX server. If it does not exist, the restore fails with a NetBackup Status Code 2820.
The default value is No.
PowerOn. Whether to turn on the target VM after the restore, as follows:
If the value is Yes, the target VM is powered ON at the end of a successful restore.
If the value is No, the target VM is not turned on after the restore.
If the restore is to an existing VM, the VM is turned off before the virtual disks are attached to it during the restore.
The default value is No.
Datacenter. The name of the VMware for the virtual disk, in pathname format. Optional.
To restore to a standalone ESXi hypervisor when the backup was through a vCenter, the value of this field must be None.
If not specified, NetBackup uses the value from the backup.
ESX. The name of the ESX host to which NetBackup should restore the virtual disk. Optional.
If not specified, NetBackup uses the value from the backup.
Folder. The pathname of the VM folder to which NetBackup should restore the virtual disk. Optional.
To restore to a standalone ESXi hypervisor when the backup was through a vCenter, the value of this field must be None.
If not specified, NetBackup uses the value from the backup.
ResourcePool/Vapp. The pathname of the resource pool to which NetBackup should restore the virtual disk. If the restore is to a vApp, specify the path of the vApp. Optional.
If not specified, NetBackup uses the value from the backup.
VmxDatastore. The name of the Datastore to which NetBackup should restore the .vmx configuration file and other VM configuration files. This Datastore is also used to create the configuration files for the temporary VM created during restore. You may enclose the name in square brackets but do not have to. Optional.
If not specified, NetBackup uses the value from the backup.
DefaultDiskDatastore. The datastore name to which NetBackup should restore all the virtual disks for In-Place Disk Restore. Optional. If not specified, NetBackup uses the value from the backup. This option is only valid for In-place Disk Restore. If this option is specified for other type of selective disk restore, it is ignored.
Fifth section (required, except when the VMwareVirtualDestination AttachDisksToExistingVM parameter is DeleteAllDisksAndReplace. If this option is specified for In-place Disk Restore, the restore validation fails.): The VMwareVirtualDiskDestination section of the filename is an array that specifies the disks to restore and the restore parameters for those disks. This section is subordinate to the VMwareRestoreParameters section. It can contain one or more sets of the following fields, one set per virtual machine disk. A comma must separate fields in a set, and a comma must separate sets.
VirtualDisk. The full pathname of the virtual disk to restore. This path must match exactly the path of the .vmdk file when it was backed up. Required.
OverwriteExistingDisk. Whether to overwrite the existing virtual disk or disks on the target VM, as follows:
If the value is Yes, overwrite the original virtual disk and retain the disk UUID.
If the value is No, restore the virtual disk to the target VM as a new disk. VMware assigns a new UUID to the disk.
The default value is No.
Datastore. The name of the Datastore that is the destination for the restore. You may enclose the name in square brackets but do not have to. (VMware generates the Datastore pathname using the naming conventions for the VM.) Optional.
For a restore of virtual disks to a datastore cluster, specify the name of the datastore cluster in this field.
If not specified, NetBackup uses the value that is specified in the Path field. If neither Datastore or Path are specified, NetBackup uses the Datastore from the backup image.
Path. The full pathname to the restore destination for the virtual disk, in the following format:
[datastore_name] MyVM/MyVM.vmdk
Optional.
If you specify a Path and it is not available or a disk already exists at that path, the restore fails. If neither Datastore or Path are specified, NetBackup uses the Datastore from the backup image.
Provisioning. The disk provisioning for this specific disk: thin, thick, eagerzeroed, or unknown. Optional.
If not specified, the NetBackup uses the DefaultDiskProvisioning value.
Controller
The virtual disk controller to which the disk is attached in the original VM. Optional
This field is informational only to help you determine which virtual disk or disks to restore. The value is not used during a restore.
Sixth section (optional). The VMwareAdvancedRestoreOptions section of the file specifies parameters to restore to an existing VM. This section is subordinate to the VMwareRestoreParameters section.
DeleteRestoredVMOnError. Whether to delete the temporary VM if the disk attach operation fails, as follows:
If the value is Yes, delete the temporary VM.
If the value is No, do not delete the temporary VM. If the disks are not successfully attached to the target VM, you can access the data on the temporary VM.
The default value is No. Optional.
VMShutdownWaitSeconds. For restores to an existing VM, the restore process shuts down the target virtual machine before it attaches the disk or disks. The duration of the shutdown operation depends on the VMware workload. Use this parameter to specify how long the restore process should wait for shutdown before giving up on restore.
The default value is 900 seconds (15 minutes). Optional.
Specifies the pathname of the file in which nbrestorevm writes the parameters of the individual virtual machine disk or disks that you want to restore. By default, nbrestorevm creates the file in the current working directory. To specify the backup image from which to obtain the parameters, use the -backupid option or the -s and -e options. If you specify the -s and -e options, NetBackup uses the most exact backup in that date range.
Edit the file so that it contains the appropriate information. Ensure that the VMName field contains the name for the new VM. Ensure that the VMwareVirtualDiskDestination section of the file contains only the virtual machine disk or disks that you want to restore. Use the edited file as the input file for the -restorespec option, which restores the virtual machine disk or disks that are identified in the file.
By default, nbrestorevm creates the file in the current working directory. To create the file in a different directory, specify a pathname for the filename. That path must be in the NetBackup allowed list of paths.
For more information on how to add a custom path, see the "BPCD_ALLOWED_PATH option for NetBackup servers and clients" syllabu in the NetBackup Administrator's Guide, Volume I.
Specifies a different master server to restore a virtual machine from a backup that was made by that master.
Limits the selectable backup images to those with timestamps that fall within the specified period. NetBackup selects the latest suitable backup image within the range. Specifies the start date (-s) and end date (-e) for the listing. The start date and end date signify the time range to search for a valid backup image. The latest valid backup image within the specified time range is used to perform restores. These options are used with all functions except the BMR VM conversion.
Specifies a temporary datastore on the VM host server where all writes occur until the virtual machine is restored. All writes occur on this datastore until Storage vMotion is complete or until you are finished with the virtual machine (such as for troubleshooting). This datastore must exist before you run nbrestorevm. This option can be used only with -ir_activate. This option is used only with Instant Recovery.
Validates the virtual machine disk restore parameters in the filename. The -restorespec option is required, and it must follow the -validate option.
For a description of the filename, see the -restorespec option description.
Restores a vCloud virtual machine. This option is required when you restore to the original location or to an alternate location in vCloud.
Restores a vCloud virtual machine by using the datastore with the largest available space. This option applies only to the restore operations that are not directed to the original location.
Overwrites the existing vCloud vApp.
Redirects the vCloud restore.
Removes the vApp if you use the -vcdtemplate option to save the vApp as a template.
Restores a vCloud virtual machine to an existing vCloud vApp. This option is required when you restore to an existing vApp including an original location restore.
Restores a vCloud virtual machine as a template.
Full (absolute) file path that contains the virtual environment details in param=value format. A veconfig
file typically contains the following entries:
esxhost="bmresx.xyz.com" name="Test_NBRestoreVM" network="VM Network" nbrestorediskformat="ThinVdisk" toolsIsoPath="C:\B2V\windows_esx5.iso" datacenter="/Test/XyzDatacenter" folder="/Test/XyzDatacenter/vm" resourcepool="/Test/XyzDatacenter/host/bmresx.xyz.com/Resources/ resourcepoolname" harddisk=0:"B2V_4TB" harddisk=1:"storage1 (2)" harddisk=2:"storage2 (1)"
The following are notes regarding these entries:
The folder, resourcepool, and diskformat fields are optional.
The VM conversion on a standalone esx
server uses the following values:
datacenter="ha-datacenter" resourcepool="/ha-datacenter/host/esx_host_name/Resources"
To create all VMDKs corresponding to disks on the same datastore, define the datastore name by using the entry datastore="datastoreName".
To create VMDKs on different datastores, populate the veconfig
file as shown in the demo file above (harddisk=0...).
Disk format of the restored disk will be 'eager zero'
Restores the VMDK files as flat disks.
Specifies the VM host on which the virtual machines were mounted when you reactivate virtual machines.
Restores a Hyper-V virtual machine at the original location.
Restores a Hyper-V virtual machine to a new location.
Restores Hyper-V virtual machine files to a staging location.
Restores the BIOS UUID of the virtual machine instead of creating a new one.
For VMware: Restores the BIOS UUID of the virtual machine instead of creating a new one.
For Hyper-V: Restores the GUID of the virtual machine instead of creating a new one.
For Hyper-V, when you restore to the original location or to a staging location, the virtual machine's original GUID is restored. This behavior is true even if the vmid option is omitted.
Retains the Instance UUID of the original virtual machine (note that the Instance UUID is a vCenter specific unique identifier of a virtual machine). The virtual machine is restored with the same Instance UUID that it had when it was backed up.
If the restore of the virtual machine is to a standalone ESXi host, this option is ignored.
If a virtual machine with the same Instance UUID exists at the target restore location, NetBackup assigns a new UUID to the virtual machine.
Retains the hardware version upon recovery. This option applies only to VMware VM recovery.
Generate new virtual machine disk UUIDs during an instant recovery. Use this option with the - ir_activate option.
The VMs that activate with this option do not retain the new vmdk UUID during a subsequent - ir_reactivate operation. In such a scenario, the VMDKs revert to their UUIDs at the time of the backup.
Specifies that you do not want to restore the common files when you restore the Hyper-V virtual machine.
Automatically powers up the virtual machine after the restore operation.
Specifies the VMware access host. It overrides the default VMProxy used for backing up the virtual machines.
Storage lifecycle policies (SLPs) can use Auto Image Replication to replicate a virtual machine backup image to another NetBackup domain. To restore the virtual machine from the replicated image, you must include the -vmproxy option. Use the -vmproxy option to specify the backup host (access host) that is in the domain where the virtual machine was replicated.
Removes any mounted removable devices such as cd-rom or dvd-rom images.
Specifies a different target location for the restore operation (for example, ESX server or vCenter). It overrides the default VM server used for backing up the virtual machines. To restore to the same vCenter where the virtual machine originally resided, omit this option.
Strips the network interface of the virtual machine.
Strips the VMware tags from the restore.
Disk format of the restored disk will be 'thin'.
Specifies the VMware transport mode. An example of the format of vm_transport_mode is san:hotadd:nbd:nbdssl.
Allows the VMware VMDK files to be restored to the same datastore where the VMX file is specified. A rename file that assigns a different vmdk file path overrides this option.
Restores a VMware virtual machine.
Causes NetBackup to wait for a completion status from the server before it returns you to the system prompt.
The required date and time values format in NetBackup commands varies according to your locale. The /usr/openv/msg/.conf
file (UNIX) and the install_path\VERITAS\msg\LC.CONF
file (Windows) contain information such as the date-time formats for each supported locale. The files contain specific instructions on how to add or modify the list of supported locales and formats.
See the "About specifying the locale of the NetBackup installation" syllabu in the NetBackup Administrator's Guide, Volume II.
You can optionally specify a wait time in hours, minutes, and seconds. The maximum wait time you can specify is 23:59:59. If the wait time expires before the restore is complete, the command exits with a timeout status. The restore, however, still completes on the server.
If you specify 0 or do not specify a time, the wait time is indefinite for the completion status.
The latest released System Security Software market review has assessed the future development capability of the Global System Security Software market and gives data and helpful details on market construction and size. The report is planned to give market knowledge and key experiences to assist chiefs with making sound venture choices and recognize possible holes and learning experiences. Moreover, the report additionally distinguishes and examines evolving elements, arising patterns alongside fundamental drivers, difficulties, potential open doors and restrictions in the System Security Software market. Verifiable Revenue and deals volume is introduced and further information is located with hierarchical and granular perspectives to conjecture total market size and to appraise gauge numbers for key areas shrouded in the report alongside characterized and all around perceived Types and end-use industry. In extra Market Share examination of players, top to bottom profiling, item/administration and business outline, the concentrate likewise focuses on BCG framework, heat map examination, situating alongside SWOT investigation to more readily associate market seriousness.
To fathom a market comprehensively, different variables should be assessed, including socioeconomics, business cycles, and microeconomic prerequisites that relate definitively to the market under study. What’s more, the System Security Software Market shows a point by point assessment of the business state, which addresses inventive ways for organization development, monetary factors, for example, creation esteem, key districts, and development rate. Because of the COVID-19 pandemic, the worldwide System Security Software Market size was worth US$ million out of 2021 and is estimated to extend the size of US$ million by 2030 with a wonderful CAGR during the figure time frame. During the projection time frame, the overall medical clinic area is probably going to develop at a significant CAGR. Although the worldwide economy is recuperating from the economic crisis of the early 20s brought about by COVID-19, it will stay underneath pre-pandemic patterns for a drawn out period. The pandemic has exacerbated the dangers related with the very long term wave of worldwide obligation aggregation. Steepening the long-expected stoppage in possible development over the course of the following decade is additionally probable. The world has entered the COVID-19 pestilence recuperation period. In this complex monetary climate, we distributed the Global System Security Software Market Status, Trends and COVID-19 Impact Report 2021, which gives a complete examination of the worldwide System Security Software market.
Request demo Copy of this Report:
https://www.infinitybusinessinsights.com/request_sample.php?id=860273
This Report covers the maker information, including: deals volume, cost, income, gross edge, business appropriation and so forth, these information assist the buyer with realizing about the contenders better. This report additionally covers every one of the locales and nations of the world, which shows the provincial advancement status, including market size, volume and worth, as well as cost information. The exploration report on “System Security Software market” gravitates toward thoughtfulness regarding the urgent patterns and development drivers behind the business, helping financial backers and marketers in understanding the item better. The report’s nitty gritty examination reveals insight into the drawn out objectives of System Security Software and gives a cutthroat outline of the enterprise. The System Security Software Market Research permits the financial backers to zero in on the information and real factors of the System Security Software industry. The System Security Software Market Research Reports gives speculation open doors that are appropriate for novice financial backers. The estimated incomes, obligations, and purchaser base assist with deciding the methodologies and keep you on top of any significant turn of events.
The overall System Security Software Market is ordered on Product Type, Application Type, and Region.
The System Security Software Market Analysis by types is sectioned into:
Occurrence Response Software, Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) Software, Threat Intelligence Software and IoT Security Software
The System Security Software Market Industry Research by Application is sectioned into:
Individual, Enterprise and Others
Regional Analysis:
As far as Region, System Security Software market is sectioned into North America: United States, Canada, Europe: Germany, France, U.K., Italy, Russia, Asia-Pacific: China, Japan, South, India, Australia, China, Indonesia, Thailand, Malaysia, Latin America: Mexico, Brazil, Argentina, Colombia, Middle East and Africa: Turkey, Saudi, Arabia, UAE, Korea.
Competitive Analysis:
The review incorporates market share examination and profiles of players, for example, McAfee, Google, Symantec, Amazon Web Services, Microsoft, Sumo Logic, D3 Security, AlienVault, Carbon Black, Splunk, Rapid7, ActivTrak, F-Secure, Fortinet, Lookout
Highlights of the System Security Software market report are:
– A comprehensive evaluation of all opportunities and risks in the market.
– System Security Software market current developments and significant occasions.
– A deep study of business techniques for the development of the market-driving players.
– Conclusive study about the improvement plot of the market for approaching years.
– Top to bottom approach of market-express drivers, targets, and major littler scale markets.
If you need anything more than these then let us know and we will prepare the report according to your requirement.
For More Details On this Report @:
https://www.infinitybusinessinsights.com/request_sample.php?id=860273
Table of Contents:
1. System Security Software Market Overview
2. Impact on System Security Software Market Industry
3. System Security Software Market Competition
4. System Security Software Market Production, Revenue by Region
5. System Security Software Market Supply, Consumption, Export and Import by Region
6. System Security Software Market Production, Revenue, Price Trend by Type
7. System Security Software Market Analysis by Application
8. System Security Software Market Manufacturing Cost Analysis
9. Internal Chain, Sourcing Strategy and Downstream Buyers
10. Marketing Strategy Analysis, Distributors/Traders
11. Market Effect Factors Analysis
12. System Security Software Market Forecast (2022-2028)
13. Appendix
Contact Us:
473 Mundet Place, Hillside, New Jersey, United States, Zip 07205
International – +1 518 300 3575
Email: [email protected]
Website: https://www.infinitybusinessinsights.com
How well is your company protected against cybercrime?
Independent, ISO-certified security testing lab AV-Comparatives published the July 2022 Enterprise Security Test Report - 18 IT Security solutions put to test
As businesses face increased levels of cyber threats, effective endpoint protection is more important than ever. A data breach can lead to bankruptcy!"— Peter Stelzhammer, co-founder, AV-Comparatives
INNSBRUCK, Austria, July 27, 2022 /CNW/ -- The business and enterprise test report contains the test results for March-June of 2022, including the Real-World Protection, Malware Protection, Performance (Speed Impact) and False-Positives Tests. Full details of test methodologies and results are provided in the report.
https://www.av-comparatives.org/tests/business-security-test-2022-march-june/
The threat landscape continues to evolve rapidly, presenting antivirus vendors with new challenges. The test report shows how security products have adapted to these and improved protection over the years.
To be certified in July 2022 as an 'Approved Business Product' by AV-Comparatives, the tested products must score at least 90% in the Malware Protection Test, with zero false alarms on common business software, a rate below 'Remarkably High' for false positives on non-business files and must score at least 90% in the overall Real-World Protection Test over the course of four months, with less than one hundred false alarms on clean software/websites.
Endpoint security solutions for enterprise and SMB from 18 leading vendors were put through the Business Main-Test Series 2022H1: Acronis, Avast, Bitdefender, Cisco, CrowdStrike, Cybereason, Elastic, ESET, G Data, K7, Kaspersky, Malwarebytes, Microsoft, Sophos, Trellix, VIPRE, VMware and WatchGuard.
Real-World Protection Test: The Real-World Protection Test is a long-term test run over a period of four months. It tests how ell the endpoint protection software can protect the system against Internet-borne threats.
Malware Protection Test:
The Malware Protection Test requires the tested products to detect malicious programs that could be encountered on the company systems, e.g. on the local area network or external drives.
Performance Test:
Performance Test checks that tested products do not provide protection at the expense of slowing down the system.
False Positives Test:
For each of the protection tests, a False Positives Test is run. These ensure that the endpoint protection software does not cause significant numbers of false alarms, which can be particularly disruptive in business networks.
Ease of Use Review:
The report also includes a detailed user-interface review of each product, providing an insight into what it is like to use in typical day-to-day management scenarios.
Overall, AV-Comparatives' July Business Security Test 2022 report provides IT managers and CISOs with a detailed picture of the strengths and weaknesses of the tested products, allowing them to make informed decisions on which ones might be appropriate for their specific needs.
The next awards will be given to qualifying December 2022H2 (for August-November tests). Like all AV-Comparatives' public test reports, the Enterprise & Business Endpoint Security Report is available universally and for free.
https://www.av-comparatives.org/tests/business-security-test-2022-march-june/
More Tests:
https://www.av-comparatives.org/news/anti-phishing-certification-test-2022/
About AV-Comparatives?
AV-Comparatives is an independent organisation offering systematic testing to examine the efficacy of security software products and mobile security solutions. Using one of the largest demo collection systems worldwide, it has created a real-world environment for truly accurate testing.?AV-Comparatives offers freely accessible av-test results to individuals, news organisations and scientific institutions. Certification by AV-Comparatives provides a globally recognised official seal of approval for software performance.??
Newsroom: http://www.einpresswire.com/newsroom/av-comparatives/
Contact: Peter Stelzhammer
e-mail: [email protected]
phone: +43 720115542
Photo - https://mma.prnewswire.com/media/1867362/AVC_Business_Security_Test.jpg
Photo - https://mma.prnewswire.com/media/1867363/AVC_Approved_Business_Security.jpg
Logo - https://mma.prnewswire.com/media/1867361/AVC_Logo.jpg
View original content to obtain multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/av-comparatives-releases-long-term-test-of-18-leading-endpoint-enterprise--business-security-solutions--july-2022-301594367.html
SOURCE AV-Comparatives
If you are a Linux user that has to use Windows — or even a Windows user that needs some Linux support — Cygwin has long been a great tool for getting things done. It provides a nearly complete Linux toolset. It also provides almost the entire Linux API, so that anything it doesn’t supply can probably be built from source. You can even write code on Windows, compile and test it and (usually) port it over to Linux painlessly.
However, Cygwin’s package management is a little clunky and setting up the GUI environment has always been tricky, especially for new users. A project called Swan aims to make a full-featured X11 Linux environment easy to install on Windows.
The project uses Cygwin along with Xfce for its desktop. Cygwin provides pretty good Windows integration, but Swan also includes extra features. For example, you can make your default browser the Windows browser with a single click. It also includes spm — a package manager for Cygwin that is somewhat easier to use, although it still launches the default package manager to do the work (this isn’t a new idea, by the way).
Here’s a screenshot of Windows 10 (you can see Word running native in the background) with top running in a Bash shell and Thunar (the default file manager for Swan). Notice the panel at the top with the swan icon. You can add things there and there are numerous settings you can access from the swan icon.
Swan is fairly new, so it still has some rough edges, but we like where it is going. The install process is in two parts which doesn’t make sense for something trying to be easier. Admittedly, it is already easier than doing an X11 install with normal Cygwin. However, on at least one test install, the virus scanner erroneously tripped on the wget executable and that caused the install to fail.
The project is hosted on GitHub if you want to examine the source or contribute. Of course, Windows has its own support for Linux now (sort of). Swan isn’t quite a finished product and, like Cygwin, it isn’t a total replacement for Linux. But it is still worth a look on any machine that you use that boots Windows.
The MarketWatch News Department was not involved in the creation of this content.
Aug 03, 2022 (The Expresswire) -- "Final Report will add the analysis of the impact of COVID-19 on this industry."
Global “Workload Scheduling Software Market” 2022 report presents a comprehensive study of the entire Global market including market size, share trends, market dynamics, and overview by segmentation by types, applications, manufactures and geographical regions. The report offers the most up-to-date industry data on the actual market situation and future outlook for the Workload Scheduling Software market. The report also provides up-to-date historical market size data for the period and an illustrative forecast to 2028 covering key market aspects like market value and volume for Workload Scheduling Software industry.
Get a demo PDF of the Report - https://www.absolutereports.com/enquiry/request-sample/21317277
Market Analysis and Insights: Global Workload Scheduling Software Market
System management software is an application that manages all applications of an enterprise such as scheduling and automation, event management, workload scheduling, and performance management. Workload scheduling software is also known as batch scheduling software. It automates, monitors, and controls jobs or workflows in an organization. It allows the execution of background jobs that are unattended by the system administrator, aligning IT with business objectives to Strengthen an organization's performance and reduce the total cost of ownership. This process is known as batch processing. Workload scheduling software provides a centralized view of operations to the system administrator at various levels: project, organizational, and enterprise.
The global Workload Scheduling Software market size is projected to reach USD million by 2028, from USD million in 2021, at a CAGR of during 2022-2028.
According to the report, workload scheduling involves automation of jobs, in which tasks are executed without human intervention. Solutions like ERP and customer relationship management (CRM) are used in organizations across the globe. ERP, which is a business management software, is a suite of integrated applications that is being used by organizations in various sectors for data collection and interpretation related to business activities such as sales and inventory management. CRM software is used to manage customer data and access business information.
The major players covered in the Workload Scheduling Software market report are:
● BMC Software ● Broadcom ● IBM ● VMWare ● Adaptive Computing ● ASG Technologies ● Cisco ● Microsoft ● Stonebranch ● Wrike ● ServiceNow ● Symantec ● Sanicon Services ● CloudifyGet a demo Copy of the Workload Scheduling Software Market Report 2022
Global Workload Scheduling Software Market: Drivers and Restrains
The research report has incorporated the analysis of different factors that augment the market’s growth. It constitutes trends, restraints, and drivers that transform the market in either a positive or negative manner. This section also provides the scope of different segments and applications that can potentially influence the market in the future. The detailed information is based on current trends and historic milestones. This section also provides an analysis of the volume of production about the global market and about each type from 2017 to 2028. This section mentions the volume of production by region from 2017 to 2028. Pricing analysis is included in the report according to each type from the year 2017 to 2028, manufacturer from 2017 to 2022, region from 2017 to 2022, and global price from 2017 to 2028.
A thorough evaluation of the restrains included in the report portrays the contrast to drivers and gives room for strategic planning. Factors that overshadow the market growth are pivotal as they can be understood to devise different bends for getting hold of the lucrative opportunities that are present in the ever-growing market. Additionally, insights into market expert’s opinions have been taken to understand the market better.
To Understand How Covid-19 Impact Is Covered in This Report - https://www.absolutereports.com/enquiry/request-covid19/21317277
Global Workload Scheduling Software Market: Segment Analysis
The research report includes specific segments by region (country), by manufacturers, by Type and by Application. Each type provides information about the production during the forecast period of 2017 to 2028. By Application segment also provides consumption during the forecast period of 2017 to 2028. Understanding the segments helps in identifying the importance of different factors that aid the market growth.
Segment by Type
● On-Premises ● Cloud-BasedSegment by Application
● Large Enterprises ● Small And Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs) ● Government OrganizationsWorkload Scheduling Software Market Key Points:
● Characterize, portray and Forecast Workload Scheduling Software item market by product type, application, manufactures and geographical regions. ● give venture outside climate investigation. ● give systems to organization to manage the effect of COVID-19. ● give market dynamic examination, including market driving variables, market improvement requirements. ● give market passage system examination to new players or players who are prepared to enter the market, including market section definition, client investigation, conveyance model, item informing and situating, and cost procedure investigation. ● Stay aware of worldwide market drifts and give examination of the effect of the COVID-19 scourge on significant locales of the world. ● Break down the market chances of partners and furnish market pioneers with subtleties of the cutthroat scene.Inquire or Share Your Questions If Any before the Purchasing This Report - https://www.absolutereports.com/enquiry/pre-order-enquiry/21317277
Geographical Segmentation:
Geographically, this report is segmented into several key regions, with sales, revenue, market share, and Workload Scheduling Software market growth rate in these regions, from 2015 to 2028, covering
● North America (United States, Canada and Mexico) ● Europe (Germany, UK, France, Italy, Russia and Turkey etc.) ● Asia-Pacific (China, Japan, Korea, India, Australia, Indonesia, Thailand, Philippines, Malaysia, and Vietnam) ● South America (Brazil etc.) ● Middle East and Africa (Egypt and GCC Countries)Some of the key questions answered in this report:
● Who are the worldwide key Players of the Workload Scheduling Software Industry? ● How the opposition goes in what was in store connected with Workload Scheduling Software? ● Which is the most driving country in the Workload Scheduling Software industry? ● What are the Workload Scheduling Software market valuable open doors and dangers looked by the manufactures in the worldwide Workload Scheduling Software Industry? ● Which application/end-client or item type might look for gradual development possibilities? What is the portion of the overall industry of each kind and application? ● What centered approach and imperatives are holding the Workload Scheduling Software market? ● What are the various deals, promoting, and dissemination diverts in the worldwide business? ● What are the key market patterns influencing the development of the Workload Scheduling Software market? ● Financial effect on the Workload Scheduling Software business and improvement pattern of the Workload Scheduling Software business?Purchase this Report (Price 2900 USD for a Single-User License) -https://www.absolutereports.com/purchase/21317277
Detailed TOC of Global Workload Scheduling Software Market Research Report 2022
1 Workload Scheduling Software Market Overview
1.1 Product Overview and Scope
1.2 Segment by Type
1.2.1 Global Market Size Growth Rate Analysis by Type 2022 VS 2028
1.3 Workload Scheduling Software Segment by Application
1.3.1 Global Consumption Comparison by Application: 2022 VS 2028
1.4 Global Market Growth Prospects
1.4.1 Global Revenue Estimates and Forecasts (2017-2028)
1.4.2 Global Production Capacity Estimates and Forecasts (2017-2028)
1.4.3 Global Production Estimates and Forecasts (2017-2028)
1.5 Global Market Size by Region
1.5.1 Global Market Size Estimates and Forecasts by Region: 2017 VS 2021 VS 2028
1.5.2 North America Workload Scheduling Software Estimates and Forecasts (2017-2028)
1.5.3 Europe Estimates and Forecasts (2017-2028)
1.5.4 China Estimates and Forecasts (2017-2028)
1.5.5 Japan Estimates and Forecasts (2017-2028)
2 Workload Scheduling Software Market Competition by Manufacturers
2.1 Global Production Capacity Market Share by Manufacturers (2017-2022)
2.2 Global Revenue Market Share by Manufacturers (2017-2022)
2.3 Market Share by Company Type (Tier 1, Tier 2 and Tier 3)
2.4 Global Average Price by Manufacturers (2017-2022)
2.5 Manufacturers Production Sites, Area Served, Product Types
2.6 Market Competitive Situation and Trends
2.6.1 Market Concentration Rate
2.6.2 Global 5 and 10 Largest Workload Scheduling Software Players Market Share by Revenue
2.6.3 Mergers and Acquisitions, Expansion
3 Workload Scheduling Software Production Capacity by Region
3.1 Global Production Capacity of Workload Scheduling Software Market Share by Region (2017-2022)
3.2 Global Revenue Market Share by Region (2017-2022)
3.3 Global Production Capacity, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2017-2022)
3.4 North America Production
3.4.1 North America Production Growth Rate (2017-2022)
3.4.2 North America Production Capacity, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2017-2022)
3.5 Europe Production
3.5.1 Europe Production Growth Rate (2017-2022)
3.5.2 Europe Production Capacity, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2017-2022)
3.6 China Production
3.6.1 China Production Growth Rate (2017-2022)
3.6.2 China Production Capacity, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2017-2022)
3.7 Japan Production
3.7.1 Japan Production Growth Rate (2017-2022)
3.7.2 Japan Production Capacity, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2017-2022)
4 Global Workload Scheduling Software Market Consumption by Region
4.1 Global Consumption by Region
4.1.1 Global Consumption by Region
4.1.2 Global Consumption Market Share by Region
4.2 North America
4.2.1 North America Consumption by Country
4.2.2 United States
4.2.3 Canada
4.3 Europe
4.3.1 Europe Consumption by Country
4.3.2 Germany
4.3.3 France
4.3.4 U.K.
4.3.5 Italy
4.3.6 Russia
4.4 Asia Pacific
4.4.1 Asia Pacific Consumption by Region
4.4.2 China
4.4.3 Japan
4.4.4 South Korea
4.4.5 China Taiwan
4.4.6 Southeast Asia
4.4.7 India
4.4.8 Australia
4.5 Latin America
4.5.1 Latin America Consumption by Country
4.5.2 Mexico
4.5.3 Brazil
Get a demo Copy of the Workload Scheduling Software Market Report 2022
5 Workload Scheduling Software Market Segment by Type
5.1 Global Production Market Share by Type (2017-2022)
5.2 Global Revenue Market Share by Type (2017-2022)
5.3 Global Price by Type (2017-2022)
6 Workload Scheduling Software Market Segment by Application
6.1 Global Production Market Share by Application (2017-2022)
6.2 Global Revenue Market Share by Application (2017-2022)
6.3 Global Price by Application (2017-2022)
7 Workload Scheduling Software Market Key Companies Profiled
7.1 Manufacture 1
7.1.1 Manufacture 1 Corporation Information
7.1.2 Manufacture 1 Product Portfolio
7.1.3 Manufacture 1 Production Capacity, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2017-2022)
7.1.4 Manufacture 1 Main Business and Markets Served
7.1.5 Manufacture 1 exact Developments/Updates
7.2 Manufacture 2
7.2.1 Manufacture 2 Corporation Information
7.2.2 Manufacture 2 Product Portfolio
7.2.3 Manufacture 2 Production Capacity, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2017-2022)
7.2.4 Manufacture 2 Main Business and Markets Served
7.2.5 Manufacture 2 exact Developments/Updates
7.3 Manufacture 3
7.3.1 Manufacture 3 Corporation Information
7.3.2 Manufacture 3 Product Portfolio
7.3.3 Manufacture 3 Production Capacity, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2017-2022)
7.3.4 Manufacture 3 Main Business and Markets Served
7.3.5 Manufacture 3 exact Developments/Updates
8 Workload Scheduling Software Manufacturing Cost Analysis
8.1 Key Raw Materials Analysis
8.1.1 Key Raw Materials
8.1.2 Key Suppliers of Raw Materials
8.2 Proportion of Manufacturing Cost Structure
8.3 Manufacturing Process Analysis of Workload Scheduling Software
8.4 Workload Scheduling Software Industrial Chain Analysis
9 Marketing Channel, Distributors and Customers
9.1 Marketing Channel
9.2 Workload Scheduling Software Distributors List
9.3 Workload Scheduling Software Customers
10 Market Dynamics
10.1 Workload Scheduling Software Industry Trends
10.2 Workload Scheduling Software Market Drivers
10.3 Workload Scheduling Software Market Challenges
10.4 Workload Scheduling Software Market Restraints
11 Production and Supply Forecast
11.1 Global Forecasted Production of Workload Scheduling Software by Region (2023-2028)
11.2 North America Workload Scheduling Software Production, Revenue Forecast (2023-2028)
11.3 Europe Workload Scheduling Software Production, Revenue Forecast (2023-2028)
11.4 China Workload Scheduling Software Production, Revenue Forecast (2023-2028)
11.5 Japan Workload Scheduling Software Production, Revenue Forecast (2023-2028)
12 Consumption and Demand Forecast
12.1 Global Forecasted Demand Analysis of Workload Scheduling Software
12.2 North America Forecasted Consumption of Workload Scheduling Software by Country
12.3 Europe Market Forecasted Consumption of Workload Scheduling Software by Country
12.4 Asia Pacific Market Forecasted Consumption of Workload Scheduling Software by Region
12.5 Latin America Forecasted Consumption of Workload Scheduling Software by Country
13 Forecast by Type and by Application (2023-2028)
13.1 Global Production, Revenue and Price Forecast by Type (2023-2028)
13.1.1 Global Forecasted Production of Workload Scheduling Software by Type (2023-2028)
13.1.2 Global Forecasted Revenue of Workload Scheduling Software by Type (2023-2028)
13.1.3 Global Forecasted Price of Workload Scheduling Software by Type (2023-2028)
13.2 Global Forecasted Consumption of Workload Scheduling Software by Application (2023-2028)
13.2.1 Global Forecasted Production of Workload Scheduling Software by Application (2023-2028)
13.2.2 Global Forecasted Revenue of Workload Scheduling Software by Application (2023-2028)
13.2.3 Global Forecasted Price of Workload Scheduling Software by Application (2023-2028)
14 Research Finding and Conclusion
15 Methodology and Data Source
15.1 Methodology/Research Approach
15.1.1 Research Programs/Design
15.1.2 Market Size Estimation
15.1.3 Market Breakdown and Data Triangulation
15.2 Data Source
15.2.1 Secondary Sources
15.2.2 Primary Sources
15.3 Author List
15.4 Disclaimer
For Detailed TOC - https://www.absolutereports.com/TOC/21317277#TOC
Contact Us:
Absolute Reports
Phone : US +1 424 253 0807
UK +44 203 239 8187
Email : sales@absolutereports.com
Web : https://www.absolutereports.com
Our Other Reports:
High Performance Tape Market Size and Growth 2022 Analysis Report by Development Plans, Manufactures, Latest Innovations and Forecast to 2028Press Release Distributed by The Express Wire
To view the original version on The Express Wire visit Workload Scheduling Software Market Size and Growth 2022 Analysis Report by Development Plans, Manufactures, Latest Innovations and Forecast to 2028
COMTEX_411474152/2598/2022-08-03T02:15:57
Is there a problem with this press release? Contact the source provider Comtex at editorial@comtex.com. You can also contact MarketWatch Customer Service via our Customer Center.
The MarketWatch News Department was not involved in the creation of this content.
ConsumerAffairs is not a government agency. Companies displayed may pay us to be Authorized or when you click a link, call a number or fill a form on our site. Our content is intended to be used for general information purposes only. It is very important to do your own analysis before making any investment based on your own personal circumstances and consult with your own investment, financial, tax and legal advisers.
Company NMLS Identifier #2110672
Copyright © 2022 Consumers Unified LLC. All Rights Reserved. The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission.