Free free pdf of CPAT exam that will make your day.

Were highly concerned that a majority of problematic thing on the web is low good quality and invalid Candidate Physical Ability Test bootcamp of which men and women use and even fail the test. We have defeat this problem by simply making our CPAT VCE. valid, current and tested. Each of our FCTC CPAT Exam may come way up with test inquiries that reflect the true CPAT exam. High quality and reliability and incentive intended for the CPAT Exam.

Exam Code: CPAT Practice exam 2022 by team
Candidate Physical Ability Test
FCTC Candidate Practice Test
Killexams : FCTC Candidate practice questions - BingNews Search results Killexams : FCTC Candidate practice questions - BingNews Killexams : How To Test If Job Candidates Are Innovative

“Innovative” tops the list of attitudes today’s companies say define their top performers. But one of the biggest problems in hiring for innovation (and other similarly abstract concepts) is that every company defines innovation a bit differently. Your definition of innovation may include taking big risks, or maybe it involves building support for your big ideas. You may focus on the ideational parts of innovation while other companies are concerned with the implementation.

One of the best ways to define a concept like innovation is to look at the glaring differences in how your high and low performers actually do innovation.

Here’s a real-life example. This company took a hard look at their best and worst employees when it comes to innovation and found the following:

High Performers On Innovation: Our high performers on innovation love big, high-risk goals. Tight deadlines increase their passion and they are happy to work without much input from management. They are finely tuned in to where the company is headed and take initiative to reinvent themselves by gaining new skills to stay relevant in the job. These high performers are team players when it comes to creative problem solving and they don’t need personal credit for success.

Low Performers On Innovation: The people we consider low performers on innovation need creative handholding. They’re afraid to do something new or take a risk without first getting leadership approval. They resist change efforts and ask, “Why do I have to do this?” when given new work assignments. Innovative low performers also prefer to go solo in attacking challenges and they want all the credit for success.

Now that you know what innovation looks like, you need to ask an interview question that is so open-ended that candidates are forced to reveal their true personality on the Topic of innovation.

Here’s the question that I recommend:

Could you tell me about a time you lacked the skills or knowledge to complete an assignment?

It’s a very simple question, and that’s by design. It’s so open-ended that there are no giveaways about the right and wrong answer. And that’s why it’s so effective at differentiating high and low performers. You can see more questions designed like this, and how tough they are to answer correctly, with the free online test “Could You Pass This Job Interview?”

Now, once you have your definitions of innovation and a truly open-ended question, you’re ready to assess real candidates.

The following are responses given by real candidates applying at this company, note how easily you can identify the potential high performers based on how the organization defines innovation.

Question: Could you tell me about a time you lacked the skills or knowledge to complete an assignment?’

Candidate A: I was asked to cover for a coworker on a critical project where there was an ongoing issue. I lacked a lot of the details but knew I had to move fast so I reached out to the account owner and the employee who had been working on the project to get any existing information. Then I got access to the client's systems and researched the problem. I jumped in and used my relationships inside and outside the office to address the problem.

Candidate B: I had an end of year project given to me by a manager that focused in a very different direction than anything we had ever done before. I spent several days just trying to understand the information I was given to input and why it even mattered to the company.

Candidate C: I see it as a promotion of sorts to be given challenging assignments that require me to flex new skills. There was no formal training or transition process at my last company, so this happened a lot. I kept up to date with industry news and happenings and I worked with diverse teams within the company to understand more and to learn something new every day.

Candidate D: I was given the task of formulating a pricing structure for a new product where I lacked the required expertise. I built a team of people from several departments to come up with a solution.

Candidate E: We implemented new software and no one on the team could understand the best way to utilize it. I took it upon myself to play around with it after work to discover its capabilities and I mastered the software. I earned the informal title of the “go-to” expert in the organization, even my boss had to come to me whenever he hit a problem.

Candidates A, C and D show some of the hallmarks that define the organization’s innovative high performers. But there’s still some work to do with Candidates B and E.

If the success of your organization depends upon innovative new hires, don’t leave anything to chance. Start by formalizing your company’s unique definition of innovative as it applies to both high and low performers. And make sure every person involved in the hiring process knows it by heart. Then use a truly open-ended question to reveal the candidates’ true personality on innovation.

Mark Murphy is a NY Times bestseller, author of Hiring For Attitude, and founder of the leadership training firm Leadership IQ.

Sun, 28 Aug 2016 02:21:00 -0500 Mark Murphy en text/html
Killexams : Apple Secretly Uses These 3 Interview Tests to Easily Separate Candidates No result found, try new keyword!Much like the company's strangely genius interview question "Is a coconut a fruit?"--which tests a candidate's ability to roll with distractions and humor others the way one might in a day in the ... Mon, 26 Sep 2022 09:04:00 -0500 text/html Killexams : Letter: Questions for candidates

With the general election on Nov. 8, there are a few questions that candidates should answer so voters can better understand what they would do if elected.

In the last five years, how have you contributed to our community so it is a better place to live? Volunteering on a regular basis in groups not connected with friends or family helps candidates understand the needs of all the people they would serve.

If candidates are opposed to new taxes or know ways to save the taxpayers lots of money, ask them which programs or services they will cut. Budgets are complex and have many demands. Regardless of our political persuasion, we all want certain services — roads, education, public health, safety.

As a citizen, have you participated in local projects that make our area a healthier and safer place in the future? Participating in large civic projects tells us if a public servant has a vision, does all the hard work to learn the processes, regulations, budgets and other issues. Do they demonstrate the skills of working with others and the art of compromise?

Tue, 20 Sep 2022 01:10:00 -0500 en-US text/html
Killexams : 25k candidates appear in KMU test

The Khyber Medical University Centralized Admission Test (KMU-CAT 2022) for admissions in Pharm-D, DPT, BS Nursing, and allied health sciences was held in 13 centers of the province on Sunday.

A total of 25,296 candidates participated including 18,342 male and 6,954 female students. The test results would be announced within 72 hours which can be viewed on KMU official website (

Around 10,544 students appeared in three centers of Peshawar including Islamia Collegiate School, Forest College and Govt Higher Secondary School No 1 Peshawar City, 1,530 in Abbottabad, 787 in Malakand Chakdara, 4,434 in Swat Kabal ground, 2,241 in Mardan, 1,030 in Kohat, 679 in Dera Ismail Khan, Parachinar Kurram 316, Timergara Dir Lower 1842, Bannu 962 and Swabi 931.

Meanwhile, Vice Chancellor KMU, Professor Dr Ziaul Haq said that conducting the CAT for admissions in allied health sciences programs was a big challenge for all of us.


Published in The Express Tribune, September 12th, 2022.

Sun, 11 Sep 2022 17:42:00 -0500 text/html
Killexams : 2023: Candidate challenges contestants to undertake drug test

The People’s Redemption Party (PRP) gubernatorial candidate in Katsina State, Imran Ja’afar-Jino, has challenged contestants to present their drug integrity test results to the public.

Mr Ja’afar-Jino, who gave the challenge while displaying his certificate before journalists on Saturday in Katsina, said it was important for all candidates to subject themselves to the test.

He said that he was tested and declared drug-free by the National Drugs Law Enforcement Agency (NDLEA).

He pointed out that after the NDLEA test, he also tested free at the General Hospital, Katsina.

He called on all the other candidates to do likewise, to ensure that drug addicts are not elected.

Mr Ja’afar-Jino reminded the public that NDLEA has since called on politicians seeking political offices to present themselves for such tests, but many had failed to comply.

“I wish to inform you that I honoured the call by the people of Katsina that any candidate contesting for any office should be tested for drug abuse. I have done mine and I tested free.

“I am calling on other contestants to also subject themselves to the drug test.

READ ALSO: LG Election: Kano governor orders compulsory drug test for contestants

“It is nothing to worry about. If one is found to be addicted, he will go for rehabilitation,“ he said.

According to Mr Ja’afar-Jino, a good leader must be free from drugs, saying that it is only when a leader is free from drug abuse that he can focus and do the needful.

He assured Katsina people that if elected as the governor of the state in 2023, he would steer the affairs of the state with honesty and sincerity.

Mr Ja’afar-Jino said that the people of the state could testify to his loyalty, capacity and capability to lead the state to a better and greater position.

According to him, if elected as the governor, he has plans to move the state to a level where it can compete with any city in the world in terms of development, empowerment and infrastructure.


Support PREMIUM TIMES' journalism of integrity and credibility

Good journalism costs a lot of money. Yet only good journalism can ensure the possibility of a good society, an accountable democracy, and a transparent government.

For continued free access to the best investigative journalism in the country we ask you to consider making a modest support to this noble endeavour.

By contributing to PREMIUM TIMES, you are helping to sustain a journalism of relevance and ensuring it remains free and available to all.


TEXT AD: Call Willie - +2348098788999

PT Mag Campaign AD

Sat, 24 Sep 2022 19:11:00 -0500 en-GB text/html
Killexams : Purity tests often exclude moderate candidates

of having Trump around, but the former president's support doesn't carry that much clout.

Instead, the problem has been that the party simply doesn't know how to protect itself from cranks and fraudsters. Republicans lack an effective counterargument against anyone who claims to be a true conservative and denounces everyone else for being RINOs.

So inexperienced candidates with unpopular views, such as Arizona Senate nominee Blake Masters, or Pennsylvania gubernatorial nominee Doug Mastriano, often get nominated - or they wind up dragging the eventual nominee so far from the mainstream that the nominee risks losing.

Democrats don't always nominate moderates, and even healthy parties sometimes choose to embrace unpopular positions despite the potential electoral costs. But Republicans too often act as if the only question of any relevance is which candidate is the purest conservative.

People are also reading…

Relevant experience and appeal to independents is either ignored or actually considered a flaw.

It isn't clear how much the Supreme Court's decision to end the constitutional right to abortions will cost Republicans this fall. But it sure doesn't appear to be helping. The court itself has become unpopular. Voters appear to be increasingly attached to abortion rights now that those rights have been threatened or eliminated; meanwhile, Republican legislatures are passing all sorts of uncompromising bills.

We could chalk up some of this to a normal willingness to push through new policies even at the cost of future electoral loss. But Republican moves following the court ruling, in addition to the court's decision itself, seem reckless. Republican presidents and senators haven't been satisfied with solidly conservative justices such as current Chief Justice John Roberts or former Justice Anthony Kennedy. Trump, in particular, used judicial nominations to secure the support of the hardest line activists within the Republican coalition, and Republican senators eagerly went along, only to find that if you put extremists on the court you're likely to get extreme decisions that put targets on the politicians who supported them.

The same goes for state legislators and governors who are unwilling to settle for most of a loaf when they can grab the whole thing. Abortion is one of several policy areas, along with guns and climate, in which Republican judges are taking extreme stands that are wildly popular among the most loyal Republican voters but have little backing beyond them.

It's still possible that Biden's unpopularity will swamp everything else once the majority of voters start paying attention. But it's also possible that for perhaps the first time in modern U.S. history, the party out of power will manage to throw away an election that they stood to win.

Jonathan Bernstein is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering politics and policy. A former professor of political science at the University of Texas at San Antonio and DePauw University, he wrote A Plain Blog About Politics.

Sat, 03 Sep 2022 22:51:00 -0500 en text/html
Killexams : Do debates between candidates actually matter?

“The 360” shows you diverse perspectives on the day’s top stories and debates.

What’s happening

For much of modern American history, debates have been seen as a more or less essential part of any major political campaign. As much as candidates might squabble over the details ahead of time or claim they were mistreated after the fact, it was broadly assumed that they would at some point — or, frequently, more than once — meet in a formal face-off in front of the voters.

But that tradition has eroded over latest election cycles to the point where it’s become a genuine question whether some of the most important races in this year’s midterms might feature any debates at all. In state after state, candidates have been squabbling over the timing, circumstances and number of debates.

The debate over debates has been a central theme in Senate races in two of the most closely watched current contests. In Pennsylvania, Republican Senate candidate Mehmet Oz has repeatedly accused his Democratic opponent, John Fetterman, who suffered a stroke in May, of trying to avoid debates. A similar dynamic is happening in Georgia, but with the party affiliations reversed. Incumbent Democratic Sen. Raphael Warnock had called out GOP challenger Herschel Walker for “dodging” several debate opportunities before the two campaigns came to an agreement on a single date next month. Both Fetterman and Walker eventually agreed to debate at least once.

The debate issue has emerged in a number of other races across the country. In Missouri, the Republican Senate candidate was a no-show at a candidate forum last week. It’s still unclear whether there will be any debates in the race for Pennsylvania governor. GOP candidate Doug Mastriano, who was at the Capitol during the Jan. 6 assault, has refused to participate in a traditional debate with an independent moderator. One key contest that definitely won’t include a debate is for governor of Arizona. Democrat Katie Hobbs has said she won’t debate “conspiracy theorist” Kari Lake, a Republican who has enthusiastically endorsed former President Trump’s lies about the 2020 presidential election.

Why there’s controversy

There are a number of theories for why candidates have become increasingly skeptical of debates, including a belief that the potential risks of gaffes greatly outweigh the rewards of a strong performance and the lack of perceived consequences for skipping them. Some also point to the GOP’s general rejection of the mainstream media, which typically provides a platform for political debates.

There’s also disagreement over whether this trend really matters. Debate advocates say the events offer a critical opportunity for voters to learn about the candidates and their policy positions outside of hyper-calculated campaign ads and stump speeches. They say debates can serve as a proving ground for those who voters may have questions about the aspiring politicians’ fitness for office. Many also worry that the decline in debates is a troubling symptom of a much broader shift in which lawmakers increasingly feel they don’t have to be accountable to the people they represent.

But others make the case that it doesn’t really matter whether candidates debate in person. They point to a significant body of research that suggests debate performance has little to no effect on the results of even close races. Some also argue that skill at debating is in no way representative of how someone will perform in public office.

What’s next

Debates have been scheduled in many of the high-profile Senate races across the country, all of them set to be held in October. It remains to be seen whether those events actually take place and whether they’ll play any role in deciding which party controls Congress for the next two years.


Healthy debates make a healthy democracy

“The value of debating in a democracy shouldn’t be understated. It’s a proven part of the process that helps voters become informed and make decisions on who is best to represent them in government. Voters deserve to know where candidates stand on certain issues, and debates and candidate forums are one of the best tools we have.” — Geoff Foster, executive director of Common Cause Massachusetts, to WGBH

Debates aren’t as enlightening for voters as many seem to think

“There’s not a lot of evidence we learn that much from debates in terms of policy content because the people who tend to watch debates are those who know a lot about the candidate and are tuning in to see their candidate win the same way you watch a sports game.” — Megan Goldberg, political scientist, to KCRG

Voters deserve a chance to see candidates as they really are

“The knock on debates is no one cares about them except the press. That they’re purely platforms for media outlets and media members. But they are more than that. They can show a candidate’s demeanor and temperament. How a candidate responds when challenged. They provide voters the chance to hear candidate views. In their own words. In real time. Not through handlers. Not with press or pundit interruptions.” — John Baer, Penn Live

Good debaters don’t necessarily make good leaders

“There is campaigning, and there is governing. Two different things. … Campaign choices make a big difference, and the public cannot be expected to follow issues as closely as political professionals. And yet … in the end, it is governing that really matters.” — Nelson Morgan, Arizona Republic

Most debates are unimportant, but they can occasionally be decisive in close races

“General-election debates are usually dry affairs for which the competing camps have spent weeks preparing each candidate on how to avoid walking into political traps and rehearsing a few zingers that they hope the media will focus on in their post-mortem stories. But in very close races, small mistakes can prove decisive, or at least knock a campaign in the wrong direction for a few days.” — Paul Kane, Washington Post

Without real punishment for skipping them, a lot of candidates will see debates as unnecessary

“I like debates. I think candidates should do them & they risk bad press by not doing them. But from a campaign's perspective: 1. Debate prep takes a LOT of time 2. On an event with your opponent that rarely moves the needle 3. unless you screw up. So … if it's the case that you can skip debating, and the bad press doesn't matter because voters don't really care, then campaigns have every reason to skip them and spend more time on their own campaign activities.” — Bill Scher, political analyst

The debate over debates allows candidates to distract from issues that really matter

“The debates themselves are shaping up to be major campaign issues. It’s tedious, and it does not serve the voters.” — Editorial, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

The decline of debates is a sign of how badly partisanship has splintered the country

“I don’t know how much utility they have … on the other hand, I do think it’s just a sad symptom of where we are in terms of polarization and candidates willingness … to even be in the same space with each other and talk about the same issues. It feels a little depressing to me.” — Amelia Thomson-Deveaux, FiveThirtyEight

Debates could play an important role in helping restore civility to U.S. politics

“I am hopeful we can get back to the ideal of debate, which allows citizens to be informed on the issues they need to confront. We are in a serious crisis of democracy, and we need to be able to figure out how to disagree without moving into the language of civil war.” — Tom Hollihan, political communication researcher, to U.S. News & World Report

Is there a Topic you’d like to see covered in “The 360”? Send your suggestions to

Photo illustration: Yahoo News; photos: Getty Images

Mon, 19 Sep 2022 03:32:00 -0500 en-US text/html
Killexams : Experts share the 5 best pregnancy tests of 2022 and where to buy them

Let’s face it. You either landed on this page because you’re crossing your fingers for a little bundle of joy, or you’re praying for anything but that. Nonetheless, you’re here, and we want to say it’ll all be okay.

But who better to talk about all things pregnancy than a doctor? Enter Dr. Kenosha Gleaton, board certified doctor in gynecology and obstetrics and medical director of Natalist — a women’s health startup that provides products and resources for fertility and pregnancy.

We spoke with Dr. Kenosha about the best pregnancy tests out there, when to take a test, how soon you can take one and more.

While we gathered expert insight, we still recommend reaching out to your doctor for full assurance.

FAQs with Dr. Kenosha

How do pregnancy tests work?

“Pregnancy tests detect a hormone called human Chorionic Gonadotropin (hCG), which can be detected in urine or blood after an embryo implants itself into your uterine wall,” Dr. Kenosha told The New York Post. “hCG is the first detectable sign of pregnancy, and home tests (like the Natalist Pregnancy Test and Natalist Early Pregnancy Test Strips) are an easy and reliable way to determine if you’re pregnant.”

When should you take a pregnancy test?

Dr. Kenosha explained that testing first thing in the morning before your expected period is usually your best bet, as your urine “has a higher concentration of hCG” at that time Though, you can test at any time of the day.

Dr. Kenosha also notes that “drinking lots of liquids in the few hours before testing can dilute your urine and cause a false negative result.” This meaning you could be pregnant, but the test will show you’re not.

Furthermore, “14% to 25% of women have irregular menstrual cycles, which can make it harder to predict when to test,” said Dr. Kenosha. “If this is you, try counting at least 14 days from when you had sex. If your test says you’re not pregnant and you think you might be, test again the next day or in a few days.”

All of this to say, it can be tricky to know exactly when to test, but there are a few methods that can help out.

How soon can you take a pregnancy test?

Taking a pregnancy test too soon is a thing, though, “it varies based on a test’s sensitivity rate so be sure to read the directions thoroughly,” explained Dr. Kenosha.

“You can use most pregnancy tests starting five days before you expect your period to start,” she continued. “If you get a negative result and are testing more than three days before your expected period, you could still be pregnant and should take another test in a few days.”

The reason for this is that you could be early in your pregnancy, meaning “you may not have enough hCG for the test to detect yet,” Dr. Kenosha told The Post. Though, in just two days, your hCG levels will usually double, meaning the more likely it is to get a positive result.

How accurate are pregnancy tests?

“Pregnancy tests are more than 99% accurate in clinical studies when used on the day of your expected period,” shared Dr. Kenosha. Still, false negatives are a thing. This means hCG was not detected in your urine, though you actually are pregnant.

Dr. Kenosha says false negatives happen for two reasons. First, “your urine was too diluted” or “it’s too early to detect a pregnancy.”

Truth be told, false positives are a thing too, though they’re more unlikely.

To avoid false test results, Dr. Kenosha recommends seeing your doctor to confirm your outcome.

Best pregnancy tests

1. Best pregnancy test strips: Natalist Early Pregnancy Test Strips, $16

Best pregnancy tests

Both reliable and affordable, these early pregnancy test strips provide you peace of mind ASAP. Proven to be over 99% accurate and ringing in as low as 85 cents per test, these Natalist test strips are a fan favorite. Not to mention, Natalist doesn’t produce electronic waste from batteries or other components found in many digital pregnancy tests.

2. Best early response pregnancy test: First Response Early Result Pregnancy Test, 3 Count, $13, original price: $20

Best pregnancy tests

In just three minutes, you will have an answer as to whether you are pregnant or not — even if it’s six days sooner than your missed period. Pair these tests with the EasyRead App which is over 99% accurate for full assurance.

3. Best digital pregnancy test: Clearblue Pregnancy Test Combo Pack, $10

Best pregnancy tests

Say goodbye to confusing lines and markings with this digital pregnancy test. It will clearly display your results by either reading “Pregnant” or “Not Pregnant.” In the pack is also a Clearblue Rapid Detection Pregnancy Test that will offer you positive (+) or negative (-) results.

4. Best pregnancy test subscription: Stix Pregnancy Tests, $12 every four weeks

Best pregnancy tests

Always have a test on hand with this Stix pregnancy test subscription service. You will be able to know whether you’re pregnant up to three days before your missed period.

5. Best First Response Triple Check Pregnancy Test Kit, $15

Best pregnancy tests

Tripple-check your results with this pack of three First Response tests. This pack provides you with three different ways to test.

Check out New York Post Shopping for more content.

Thu, 22 Sep 2022 03:56:00 -0500 en-US text/html
Killexams : A difficult candidate test, broken job promises and refund dispute: Unacademy’s Relevel comes under fire A difficult candidate test, broken job promises and refund dispute: Unacademy’s Relevel comes under fire © Moneycontrol A difficult candidate test, broken job promises and refund dispute: Unacademy’s Relevel comes under fire

In February this year, 28-year-old Shivam, a computer operator at a government office in Madhya Pradesh, was looking at ways to upskill as he sought a job that paid better than the Rs 10,000 a month he earned.

He came across a YouTube advertisement of Relevel, operated by SoftBank-backed edtech unicorn Unacademy. Relevel operates on a unique selling proposition—enable job seekers to take a test and secure a job in under 15 days of clearing the test.

Shivam (name changed) immediately applied for an ‘HR & Talent Acquisition Specialist Test’ of Relevel. It was free and guaranteed a package of as much as Rs 10 lakh per annum for successful candidates.

The Relevel Test has often been marketed by Unacademy CEO Gaurav Munjal on Twitter as ‘absolutely free and one that guarantees a job if you clear it.’ Your degree doesn’t matter. You could get your dream job irrespective of educational background by clearing this test, Munjal said.

Too good to be true?

Shivam would soon find out that when something appears too good to be true, it usually isn’t.

He took the test, then took it again, took it a third time, a fourth time- and failed to meet the cut-off score every single time. Just when he was at his wits' end, he received a call from a sales counsellor of Relevel.

The counsellor pitched a Relevel course worth Rs 18,750 and told him that he would be able to clear the test if he takes the course and undergoes training.

The sales counsellor told Shivam that his company noticed that he attempted—and failed— the test three-four times. He warned Shivam against another attempt, saying his profile score would be affected and he would struggle to find a job. “I suggest you take the Relevel course, where you will be taught by professional HR experts,” the counsellor told Shivam.

The counsellor then dangled the promise of better pay. “The average package taken by candidates is Rs 6-8 lakh annually and it can go up to Rs 10 lakh. You will get a job in 15 days after you clear the test,” he said, adding that employers also prefer those who have taken a course.

Shivam took the course, cleared the test, but is yet to secure a job. He said he was offered jobs by at least three companies (through LinkedIn and Glassdoor) in the last six months, but he declined those offers because he was hopeful of getting a better-paying job through Relevel.

Shivam is not alone. By all accounts, the Relevel test is a tough nut to crack.

Candidates such as Shivam, who were unable to clear the Relevel’s free tests, were pitched courses by the company, and were told that they will be able to clear the test without any difficulty if they take the course.

This promise drove at least 300 candidates to take the company’s ‘HR & Talent Acquisition Specialist Test.’  These candidates were also told that they would get a job in 15 days once they clear the test.

But this was a promise Relevel failed to fulfil, leaving many candidates angry and disappointed. Of the 300 candidates, only three got a job, an examination by Moneycontrol found.

That’s not all. The price of the course that was initially Rs 18,000 was hiked to Rs 90,000.

Shashank Murali, CEO, Relevel, contested these outcomes in an interview with Moneycontrol and said of the 300, only 100 took the test after completing the course. Murali joined Unacademy early last year, after the latter acquired his startup TapChief.

Relevel has been able to successfully place around 2,000 candidates to date in India with a cumulative CTC (cost-to-company) of Rs 80 crore, according to him. Relevel has partnered more than 800 companies, including unicorns such as Cred, upGrad, Meesho, Delhivery, and Paytm, among others, he said. He also said that the price of the test was increased over a period of time as they added more products within the course such as doubt solving and also enhanced their curriculum.

As things stand, only 15 of the 300 candidates have managed to clear the test and only three have been able to secure a job so far.

“Some of our learners or test takers, even after the course, we have noticed, require some form of coaching, with respect to how to provide interviews, what to focus on, what not to focus on etc. Some candidates need to also be coached on some of the self-inflicted constraints that they put on themselves, where in some will say we will only work from home, we only needed this city, we only needed this kind of a company,” Murali said.

“Now that is never a promise, whether it’s through a course or normally. What we try to do is provide access to, is the best available jobs that we have on the platform to those learners and as long as they wish to go through those, they will sincerely get a job,” Murali added.

Understanding Relevel

Relevel has 11 different test offerings. All these tests are free and are of 1,000 marks, with a cutoff of 500 marks. Five of these test offerings are technical tests, which are taken by candidates who want to upskill their tech knowledge, while five are business tests that include other skills like business development, associate product management, among other offerings.

These tests are conducted in two phases. The first phase is of 400 marks with a cutoff of 200 marks, while the second phase is of 600 marks. Candidates are eligible to provide the second phase only if they manage to clear the first phase. The first phase broadly includes questions on aptitude, while the second phase includes tests on softskills like confidence and interviewing capabilities.

Relevel’s business model is such that if any candidates take any of the 11 tests and manage to clear it, they are guaranteed a job by the company in under 15 days. Relevel does not charge the candidates or the employers anything for the free tests and even if they place successful candidates with companies. To be sure, this is a shift from other job ensure companies that typically charge employers post the placement.

But candidates who don’t manage to clear tests are pitched courses by the company in such a manner that they end up believing that the course will help them in clearing the test. So Relevel typically uses its ‘free tests’ platform as a funnel for leads, as those tests, purely, do not yield any revenue to the company.

“We don’t call anybody and everybody. We only call those who show intent. People who have failed the test is a very small percentage,” Murali said.

“If you go on our platform, one needs to apply for our courses by filling a form that catches a bunch of details and then one is given a time saying we will call you at this hour for admissions. So it is really really far from a sales push,” Murali added.

Alleged mis-selling

Candidates like Shivam were also told that there will be a batch of 100 people doing the course together. The duration of the course was supposed to be 90 days. However, when Shivam and other candidates logged in for the orientation lecture on May 2, they saw over 300 people logged in as candidates.

Murali claimed that their sales team do not comment at all on batch sizes. Moneycontrol has seen screenshots of sales executives’ pitches to candidates that mentioned the batch size as 100.

The pay package also suffers from discrepancy. During the orientation, trainers from Relevel told candidates that the average package for successful candidates would be around Rs 2.5 lakh. But Unacademy’s presentation still shows average salary of up to Rs 6 lakh per annum.

“Everyone on the call was shocked. We made a WhatsApp group and were discussing these things. All of a sudden from 6-8 (lakh rupees) they had come down to 2.5. We all were agitated but most of us didn’t even have a job so we decided to not take any immediate action,” Raj (name changed), another candidate, told Moneycontrol.

Murali had no specific answer for this. He said trainers might have done it for motivating candidates to work hard for better packages.

Candidates said when they were pitched these courses by Unacademy, they were told that even if they don’t have basic qualifications like 10th standard, 12th standard and graduation, they will land a job as the placement would be purely based on their test results. However, when they completed their courses and when employers started approaching them, only graduates were short-listed.

“Before joining the course I had specifically asked if graduation was required. I am currently pursuing my BBA (Bachelors in Business Administration) and I have not completed it. But after the course, the job postings that we got from Relevel had clearly mentioned that a graduation degree is a must,” said Shiva Kumar, a 28-year-old candidate.

To this complaint, Murali said Relevel has not only partnered with various companies that need graduation or 10th/12th passing certificates, but also with employers who do not require any such qualifications.

“It happened in one instance (basic graduation requirement was not there on the job posting, but later candidates were told that they would be required to have a degree), where this company was in a transition period, where they would have changed their mind, but we may have not literally updated the job posting, so at best it’s a manual error,” Murali added.

Kumar has now been blocked by Relevel’s employees and his candidacy has been put out of the company’s list. Murali said Kumar misbehaved with Relevel’s employees and so the company had to take action against him.

Another candidate, Poulomy Patra, who took a Relevel test, said she was told that she need not have an MBA degree to get a job after completion of the course.

“When in the first few tries, I wasn't able to clear the cutoff, a representative reached out to me. He said since I did not have an MBA, I could only get a job with a salary of Rs 2-3 lakh per annum, even if I cleared the test with more attempts.”

He assured Patra that after taking the course he was pitching and clearing it, her salary would jump to six to seven lakh per annum.

After the course was over, only those who had an MBA, were able to clear the test, others couldn't. “One of my batchmates who had an MBA cleared the test on her first try. Even she has not received any job offer.”

"I have taken the test at least 50 times. The cutoff is 500 and my scores are always around 492, 496 but never 500,” she said.

Sales in slow lane

Relevel’s alleged aggressive sales tactics come at a time when Unacademy’s core test preparation business is under pressure, as the demand for online coaching ebbs post pandemic. The company has been forced to undertake layoffs and other cost-cutting measures in latest months, in a bid to cut burn and coast towards profitability.

Munjal has been extremely bullish on Relevel in the past year and said in June that Relevel generated an ARR (annualised revenue run rate) of as much as $12 million. But the company has been struggling with placements and has downsized its team by half, Moneycontrol reported exclusively in August.

Nonetheless, Relevel has been central to Munjal’s pitch to investors as he prepares for the next round of fund-raising. “They had relied on Relevel as their growth engine for this year, but that doesn’t seem to be working out,” a person familiar with the matter said.

As a result, the company’s sales tactics are consumed by desperation. One of the company’s sales executives paid a month’s EMI (equated monthly instalment) from his own pocket on behalf of a candidate to get the candidate enrolled because he was falling short of his monthly target.

“You have to just tell them (top management) that I didn’t pay your EMI. I will provide you Rs 10,000 every month from my pocket, which you can use for paying your fees of Rs 35,000,” the sales executive told the candidate, Vijay (name changed). Moneycontrol has reviewed the call recording.

“If you don’t do that, I will lose my job. You will have to continue paying the remaining EMIs of Rs 4,000 per month so you won’t get any benefit out of it either. My job is at stake, your money is at stake, let’s mutually decide that I will pay you off this money in tranches, but you please don’t tell them (management) that I paid your first EMI,” the executive added.

Relevel found out about the incident and launched an enquiry. Murali said the sales executive was immediately fired, adding that Unacademy takes strict action against those who breach company policies.

In another instance, Relevel sold one of its courses containing an age limit of 35 years to a 42-year-old lady, Nisha (name changed). Relevel’s website still shows eligibility age for its courses as 18-35.

Nisha, a housewife, left her job as a government employee when she was married. Seven years after her marriage, in an attempt to restart her career, Nisha decided to upskill and take up a new job. She came across the course advertisement and contacted Relevel to inquire about it.

“I called them to ask if it was possible for someone my age to join the course. They were ready, they didn’t even inform me that the course is valid only for people between 18-35,” she said.

During the course, she recalled, the trainer also seemed skeptical if someone of her age can get a job. "No one clearly informed that it wasn’t for me or offered a refund. I did the course with the hope that I might land a job," she said.

"Now I have lost my money, and I am also not able to find a job, or even pass the test. But the worst part is even those who passed the test, didn’t get a job," she added.

Murali said they are looking into the incident.

Lack of clarity over refunds and EMIs

Candidates are also upset at lack of transparency in securing refunds. Thanks to the “guarantee of jobs in 15 days”, candidates were never told that they will get a refund if they don’t get a job unlike a few job ensure programmes run by other edtech companies such as Simplilearn and upGrad.

Candidates said less than 10 candidates have got a refund. One of them got a refund but only after threatening Unacademy with a suicide note. A copy of the note has been viewed by Moneycontrol.

Other candidates said they feel cheated for not getting a job even after having paid thousands of rupees as fees and even after having taken a three month course. Some candidates like Patra had even taken loans and are still paying EMIs regularly, despite not getting a job, as they fear their CIBIL score (credit score) will get affected.

“Relevel also told me that since the course is for students, they can offer an EMI of Rs 600 per month. I took it up and charged it to my father’s debit card. He later informed me that they have been charging 2,000-3,000 every month,” Patra said.

“When we questioned the student assistant from Relevel, he blocked about 200-300 students from Slack. He even threatened us that if we create any groups we will be blocked from viewing all content from Relevel.”

Hard selling courses has been the bane of the ed tech sector in India, which saw explosive growth in the last year, minting unicorns in categories ranging from school ed tech to test prep to executive education.

While China has already cracked the whip on the edtech sector, the Indian government issued an advisory some months ago advising parents to be careful while deciding on online content and coaching. Edtech companies then formed a self-regulatory body called the India EdTech Consortium, in a bid to prempt any stringent regulation.

With the growth engine sputtering, funding slowing down and the spectre of regulation looming large, there are many curveballs that Unacademy and its peers will have to grapple with in the coming months.

Thu, 22 Sep 2022 01:19:00 -0500 en-IN text/html
Killexams : Navy wants to screen SEAL candidates for drugs after trainee’s ‘Hell Week’ death: report

Navy officials have asked the Pentagon to approve blood tests for SEAL candidates after the death of 24-year-old New Jersey native Kyle Mullen amid reports of rampant drug use among candidates in the elite unit.

If approved, SEAL candidates for the first time would be required to undergo blood tests to detect the presence of a broad range of performance-enhancing drugs, including those that cannot be detected in standard urine tests, CNN reported Wednesday.

The Defense Department has not yet ruled on the request, the network said.

A senior naval special warfare officer told CNN on the condition of anonymity that there is “beyond a reasonable doubt that a significant portion of the candidate population is utilizing a wide range of performance-enhancing drugs.”

Senior brass in the vaunted naval unit believe drug use during the arduous Basic Underwater Demolition/SEAL (BUD/S) training includes not just human growth hormone but a wide range of other substances, according to the report.

The senior officer told CNN that “when we first heard about possible PED usage, we went in extremely fast and extremely hard on testing.”

SEAL candidates in drown-proofing training
The request by senior Navy officials follows the death by Kyle Mullen during “Hell Week” in BUD/S.
U.S. Navy

On Feb. 4, Mullen, of Manalapan, was nearing the final days of “Hell Week,” during the notoriously brutal phase-one training at Naval Amphibious Base Coronado, near San Diego, when he died.

“Friday morning, after completing Hell Week, he was laid flat on his back on the floor of the barracks, upon a mattress, with his legs up,” his mother, Regina Mullen, 57, told The Post previously, explaining that it is what all candidates were made to do.

“That was protocol,” she said, adding that she was pushing for a policy change that has been nicknamed Kyle’s Reform.

“I want independent oversight for the Navy SEALs,” she said. “It would be for people to be held accountable through independent congressional investigations. Who, for example, told the medical team to go home? I’d like to know that. That person should be accountable. And I also want top-notch medical monitoring, treatment and observation after the men go through the most rigorous training in the world.”

SEAL candidates during BUD/S training
If approved, candidates for the first time would be required to undergo blood tests to detect the presence of performance-enhancing drugs.

The official cause of death was reportedly bacterial pneumonia — though at the time, the Navy said neither Mullen nor another injured sailor were “actively” training when they became sick, according to CNN.

Regina told the New York Times — which first reported about the broad investigation into BUD/S training — that her son started taking the erectile dysfunction drug Viagra on the advice of other candidates as a possible treatment for swimming-induced pulmonary edema, or SIPE.

A common symptom of the dangerous condition, in which fluid accumulates in the lungs, is coughing up bloody fluid.

SEAL candidates during BUD/S training
A defense official says blood tests for drugs are viewed as a critical medical measure to make sure candidates are picked based on their physical capabilities.

“A 19-year-old boy with no medical background looked after him,” Regina told The Post recently about her son.

“Kyle turned blue and spit up blood all over the barracks,” she added, recounting what she had been told by the young man’s mother and father. “Paramedics worked on Kyle for 30 minutes and were unable to revive him. He was pronounced dead in a community hospital 30 minutes away.”

A defense official told CNN that blood tests for drugs are viewed as a critical medical measure make sure candidates are picked based on their physical capabilities and without the use of PEDs.

Regina Mullen looks at photo of her son, Kyle
Regina said her son, a Yale grad, refused to quit or drop out of “Hell Week,” no matter how tough it got.
Rachel Wisniewski for the New Yo

“This isn’t just a question of performance, it’s a question of integrity,” a latest SEAL member told the network, adding that commanders need to know their troops have unimpeachable ethics.

“It has the potential of a catastrophic impact. What else are they willing to do in a combat scenario?” the senior naval officer added.

Wed, 28 Sep 2022 04:42:00 -0500 en-US text/html
CPAT exam dump and training guide direct download
Training Exams List