Memorize FCNSP Real Exam Questions before attempting real exam
killexams.com served legit, valid and up to date FCNSP Practice Test with Actual Exam Questions and Answers for new subjects of Fortinet FCNSP Exam. Practice our Real FCNSP Questions and Answers to enhance your knowledge and pass your FCNSP exam in first attempt. We are making sure that your success when you face FCNSP exam in actual exam.
Exam Code: FCNSP Practice exam 2023 by Killexams.com team FCNSP Fortinet Certified Network Security Professional Exam Detail:
The FCNSP (Fortinet Certified Network Security Professional) exam is a certification exam that assesses the knowledge and skills of individuals in advanced network security administration using Fortinet products and solutions. Here is a detailed overview of the exam, including the number of questions and time, course outline, exam objectives, and exam syllabus.
Number of Questions and Time:
The exact number of questions in the FCNSP exam may vary, but it typically consists of around 40 to 60 questions. The duration of the exam is usually 90 to 120 minutes, depending on the exam format and language.
The FCNSP certification course covers various advanced syllabus related to network security administration using Fortinet products. The course outline may include the following components:
1. Advanced Firewall Configuration:
- Advanced firewall policies and rules
- User authentication and access control
- Advanced NAT (Network Address Translation) and VPN (Virtual Private Network) configurations
2. Intrusion Prevention System (IPS):
- Advanced IPS features and configurations
- Customizing IPS signatures and policies
- IPS event analysis and response
4. Advanced Security Services:
- Web filtering and application control
- Antivirus and antispam protection
- Data leak prevention (DLP) and SSL inspection
5. High Availability and Redundancy:
- Fortinet high availability (HA) features
- Load balancing and link aggregation
- Virtual clustering and virtual domains
The objectives of the FCNSP exam are to evaluate the candidate's advanced knowledge and understanding in the following areas:
- Advanced firewall configurations and policies
- Intrusion Prevention System (IPS) features and configurations
- Virtual Private Network (VPN) configurations and troubleshooting
- Advanced security services and features
- High availability and redundancy in Fortinet environments
The FCNSP exam syllabus covers the following topics:
1. Advanced Firewall Configuration
2. Intrusion Prevention System (IPS)
3. Virtual Private Networks (VPNs)
4. Advanced Security Services
5. High Availability and Redundancy
Candidates are expected to have a strong understanding of these syllabus and their practical application in advanced network security administration using Fortinet products. The exam assesses their ability to configure and manage complex firewall policies, implement advanced IPS and VPN configurations, utilize advanced security services, and implement high availability and redundancy measures. Fortinet Certified Network Security Professional Fortinet Professional tricks Killexams : Fortinet Professional tricks - BingNews
Search resultsKillexams : Fortinet Professional tricks - BingNews
https://killexams.com/exam_list/FortinetKillexams : Looking Into Fortinet's accurate Short Interest
Fortinet'sFTNT short percent of float has fallen 5.84% since its last report. The company recently reported that it has 9.56 million shares sold short, which is 1.45% of all regular shares that are available for trading. Based on its trading volume, it would take traders 2.01 days to cover their short positions on average.
Why Short Interest Matters
Short interest is the number of shares that have been sold short but have not yet been covered or closed out. Short selling is when a trader sells shares of a company they do not own, with the hope that the price will fall. Traders make money from short selling if the price of the stock falls and they lose if it rises.
Short interest is important to track because it can act as an indicator of market sentiment towards a particular stock. An increase in short interest can signal that investors have become more bearish, while a decrease in short interest can signal they have become more bullish.
As you can see from the chart above the percentage of shares that are sold short for Fortinet has declined since its last report. This does not mean that the stock is going to rise in the near-term but traders should be aware that less shares are being shorted.
Comparing Fortinet's Short Interest Against Its Peers
Peer comparison is a popular technique amongst analysts and investors for gauging how well a company is performing. A company's peer is another company that has similar characteristics to it, such as industry, size, age, and financial structure. You can find a company's peer group by studying its 10-K, proxy filing, or by doing your own similarity analysis.
According to Benzinga Pro, Fortinet's peer group average for short interest as a percentage of float is 5.13%, which means the company has less short interest than most of its peers.
Fri, 18 Aug 2023 08:15:00 -0500text/htmlhttps://www.benzinga.com/short-sellers/23/08/33924290/looking-into-fortinets-recent-short-interestKillexams : Best Practices for Securing Your Azure Environments with Fortinet
Best Practices for Securing Your Azure Environments with Fortinet
More organizations are moving to the cloud to create greater efficiencies and value, but doing so brings an expanded attack surface. How can you ensure that your Microsoft Azure workloads are secure against the latest threats? A strong security approach begins with enterprise class solutions from Fortinet. Learn the best practices for securing your Azure environment (and how Fortinet and Microsoft’s jointly developed solutions can help) with our ebook.
Fri, 03 Mar 2023 20:11:00 -0600en-UStext/htmlhttps://mcpmag.com/whitepapers/2023/03/fortinet-best-practices-for-securing-your-azure-environments-with-fortinet.aspxKillexams : Fortinet: The Market Is Overreacting To The Guidance Cut And Providing A Good Buying OpportunityNo result found, try new keyword!Fortinet offers a comprehensive solution through integrated hardware and software services, tapping into the thriving market. See why I'm bullish on FTNT stock.Sun, 20 Aug 2023 03:24:19 -0500en-ustext/htmlhttps://www.msn.com/Killexams : How the Ultrawealthy Use Private Foundations to Bank Millions in Tax Deductions While Giving the Public Little in Return
ProPublica is a nonprofit newsroom that investigates abuses of power. Sign up to receive our biggest stories as soon as they’re published.
Once a week, a little past noon on Wednesdays, a line of cars forms outside the wrought-iron gates of the Carolands mansion, 20 miles south of downtown San Francisco. From the entrance, you can see the southeast facade of the 98-room Beaux Arts chateau, which was built a century ago by an heiress to the Pullman railroad-car fortune. Not visible from that vantage point is the stately reflecting pool, or the gardens, whose original designer took inspiration from Versailles.
I was sitting just outside this splendor, idling in my rented Toyota Corolla, on a clear day last winter. Like the other people in the line of cars, I was about to enjoy a rare treat. Carolands is an architectural landmark, but it’s open only two hours a week. Would-be visitors apply a month in advance, hoping to win a lottery for tickets. Like most lotteries, this one has long odds. I had applied unsuccessfully for the three tours scheduled for February. Finally, I resorted to my journalist’s privilege: I emailed and called the director of the foundation that owns the estate, explaining that I was a reporter planning to be in the area for a few days. Could she help? Eventually, she called back and offered me a place on a tour.
It wasn’t supposed to be this difficult. When billionaire Charles Johnson sought a tax break in 2013 for donating his mansion to his private foundation, the organization assured the Internal Revenue Service and state officials that the public would be welcome. “The Foundation will fulfill its charitable and educational purpose by opening the Carolands Estate to the public,” it stated in its application for tax-exempt status, which included a pamphlet for a self-guided tour. The foundation later told a California tax regulator that the estate was open to the public every weekday from 9-5.
There was a lot of money at stake. Johnson, a Republican megadonor and part owner of the San Francisco Giants, had gotten an appraisal valuing the property at $130 million, a price higher than any publicly reported home sale in the U.S. up to that time, and five times the $26 million he and his wife, Ann, had reportedly paid 14 years earlier to buy and restore what then was a dilapidated property.
The plan worked. The IRS granted the foundation tax-exempt status. That allowed the Johnsons to collect more than $38 million in tax savings from the estate over five years, confidential tax records show.
But the Johnsons never opened Carolands to the public for 40 hours a week. Instead, the foundation bestows tickets on a few dozen lottery winners, who receive two-hour tours, led by docents, most Wednesdays at 1 p.m. Self-guided tours, like the ones described in the attachments to Johnson’s IRS application, are not offered. “It sounds like a vanity project with little to no public benefit,” said Roger Colinvaux, a professor of law at The Catholic University of America who specializes in the tax law of nonprofit organizations. (Experts also questioned Carolands’ $130 million valuation — which turbocharged the Johnsons’ deduction — while acknowledging that as long as it’s based on a qualified appraisal, which it was, the IRS is unlikely to challenge the size of the deduction.)
For the ultrawealthy, donating valuables like artwork, real estate and stocks to their own charitable foundation is an alluring way to cut their tax bills. In exchange for generous tax breaks, they are supposed to use the assets to serve the public: Art might be put on display where people can see it, or stock sold to fund programs to fight child poverty. Across the U.S., such foundations hold over $1 trillion in assets.
But a ProPublica investigation reveals that some foundation donors have obtained millions of dollars in tax deductions without holding up their end of the bargain, and sometimes they personally benefit from donations that are supposed to be a boon to the public. A tech billionaire used his charitable foundation to buy his girlfriend’s house, then stayed there with her while he was going through a divorce. A real estate mogul keeps his nonprofit art museum in his guesthouse and told ProPublica that he hadn’t shown it to a member of the public since before the pandemic. And a venture capitalist couple’s foundation bought the multimillion dollar house next to their own without ever opening the property to the public.
Unlike public charities, private foundations are typically funded by a single donor or family, who retain a high degree of control long after receiving a tax break for ostensibly giving their possessions away. “This is the classic problem with private foundations: Substantial contributors can see it as their thing,” said Philip Hackney, a law professor at the University of Pittsburgh and former IRS attorney. “There’s generally not a coalition who cares, other than the family, so there’s nothing to ensure that the assets are used for a particular purpose,” he added.
In theory, it’s illegal to fail to provide a public benefit or to make personal use of foundation assets. But the rules defining what’s in the public interest are vague, according to tax experts; for example, Congress has never defined how many hours a museum would need to be open to be considered accessible to the public. And with the IRS depleted by a decade of budget cuts, enforcement has been lax. The agency examines an average of 225 returns among the 100,000 filed by private foundations each year, according to agency statistics.
Peter Kanter, an attorney representing the Carolands Foundation, told ProPublica that “we believe pretty strongly that the foundation is serving its purpose of preserving and showcasing this historic and unique property to the public.” He said that tours are limited because the foundation has only a few volunteer docents who are knowledgeable about the home, and because significantly higher traffic might compromise the foundation’s ability to preserve its unique architecture. Kanter also emphasized the public value of free charitable events that the foundation occasionally hosts for other nonprofits at the estate.
At the Carolands, guides didn’t emphasize benefits to the public — just the opposite. A docent told my tour group that the foundation prefers lotteries to holding regular hours and charging admission. This, he explained, preserves the home for those who “really want to see it.” Indeed, exclusivity and rarefied taste were a theme of the tour, which included tales of the exacting specifications of Harriett Carolan, the Pullman heiress, a Francophile who imported an entire salon that had been built in France on the eve of the revolution. (For their parts, when Ann and Charles Johnson unveiled the restored chateau at a costume party, they dressed as Marie Antoinette and Louis XVI.)
Before the tour, one of the docents asked how many of us had ever visited a nearby historical mansion, called the Filoli estate, built in the same era as the Carolands. Many hands shot up among the tour group. When he asked if any of us had visited the Carolands before, no one raised their hand.
Curious, I popped by Filoli the following afternoon. It is run by a public charity and is open from 10 to 5 every day. In contrast to the Carolands, I was able to simply show up, pay admission and enter. Inside, I encountered dozens of employees who provided helpful information and watched over the manor and its gardens while more than a hundred visitors wandered about. Photography, which had been prohibited inside the Carolands, was permitted at Filoli.
Congress and the IRS have never clearly defined what qualifies as a “public benefit.” By contrast, identifying a private benefit is much simpler. Decades ago Congress prohibited what it called self-dealing by insiders. The laws are designed to keep them from using or profiting from foundation assets. Among other things, the rules bar leases between a donor and their foundation. Violations can incur a penalty known as an excise tax.
At least one billionaire appears to have run afoul of those real estate rules, according to tax experts. Since 2009, Ken Xie, CEO of a cybersecurity company called Fortinet, has gotten more than $30 million in income tax deductions for contributing shares of his business to a private foundation that he started to support various charitable causes.
In 2017, Xie’s foundation (whose sole officers are Xie and his brother) spent $3 million to purchase a home in Cupertino, California, from his new girlfriend while he was going through an acrimonious divorce. After the foundation purchased the home, Xie allowed his girlfriend to continue living there; he also stayed there for a time. These details emerged in a lawsuit filed by the now-ex-girlfriend, who was permitted to file the suit anonymously, in county court. (The suit is ongoing.) According to leases filed in the case, the foundation charged her rent, but Xie agreed to pay half of it.
Xie himself appears to have been aware that he risked violating the rules. In a December 2019 text message to his girlfriend that was included in the court case, Xie wrote, “I covered some house part but also try not creat issue related to foundation and tax, believe will make some progress next few months by transfer house out of foundation, may need 2 step by first transfer to other entity.” The next month, his foundation transferred the property to an LLC.
In an email to ProPublica, Gordon Finwall, a lawyer for Xie, said the foundation is “fully committed to complying with all applicable rules and regulations.” He acknowledged that Xie “spent some time at the Cupertino property in 2017 and 2018,” but asserted that the sublease was never in effect and Xie never paid his ex-girlfriend any rent.
Two days after I emailed Finwall in April inquiring about the Xie Foundation’s purchase of the house, the foundation filed records with the California attorney general’s office, stating that it had “discovered a self-dealing event” and including a federal tax return with the word “amended” handwritten at the top. In his email to ProPublica, Finwall said that, after amending its returns, the foundation “paid some excise taxes related to Mr. Xie’s stay at the property.” Finwall also said that Xie had planned to file the amended returns months earlier but didn’t do so because his accountant mailed the IRS forms to Xie at an outdated address.
Despite the blurriness of many rules relating to foundations, the issue of public access has given rise to controversy in the past. After a New York Times article in 2015 exposed the limited hours of many private museums, the Senate Finance Committee, under then-chairman Orrin Hatch, launched an investigation. Hatch expressed concerns about museums that require advance reservations and maintain limited public hours. He questioned instances where “founding donors continue to play an active role in management and operations of the museum” and “museum buildings are adjacent to the donor’s private residence.”
But no meaningful rule changes followed the investigation. And absent new laws, cracking down on abusive foundations would require the IRS to put scarce resources into an area that many experts said simply isn’t a priority, particularly after the agency’s previous attempt to police abuse by political nonprofits a decade ago caused a conservative firestorm.
The agency doesn’t appear likely to increase oversight any time soon. A recently published budget blueprint outlining IRS priorities for the $80 billion in new funding it received from the Inflation Reduction Act made no mention of increasing audits of private foundations.
“The IRS protects the public interest by applying the tax law with integrity and fairness to all,” the agency wrote in a statement to ProPublica. The statement cited a compliance program that “focuses on high-risk issues” among tax-exempt organizations, and it asserted that the program “deploys the right resources to address noncompliance issues.” The IRS also pointed to a accurate tax court case that it won against a foundation that, among other things, kept a collection of African artifacts in a basement with no public access. And an agency spokesperson highlighted a rule stating that foundations can lose their exempt status if they operate in a manner “materially different” than what they claimed they would do in their initial application.
Despite the attention spurred by the Hatch investigation, some foundations seem to have continued undeterred. Consider the Lijin Gouhua Foundation. Collecting Chinese paintings and sharing them with the public was the stated mission of the organization, which was launched by Bay Area venture capitalists J. Sanford “Sandy” Miller and his then-wife, Vinie Zhang Miller, in 2006. Since then, the couple generated $5.6 million worth of income tax write-offs largely from donating shares of tech companies like Twitter and Snapchat to their private foundation.
When the couple cashed in the foundation’s stock to buy a potential museum space for the art in 2017, they opted against a high-traffic location where lots of people could easily access it. Instead, they chose the $3.1 million house adjacent to their own estate in Woodside, an exclusive enclave outside of San Francisco.
“A private museum is usually by appointment only,” Vinie Miller said when asked about the out-of-the-way location. “We wouldn’t hold long showing hours. It’s usually people we have a relationship with.” She said that the main way for the public to access the collection was through loans of artwork the foundation has made to universities, other museums and galleries. (In an email, Sandy Miller wrote: “Please be advised that I am not married to Vinie and that I have no involvement with the Lijin Gouhua Foundation.” Public records show Vinie filed for divorce from him in 2019; Sandy ceased to be listed as president of the foundation on IRS filings that year as well.)
The museum that was purchased with the foundation’s tax-exempt funds never actually opened. Vinie Miller said the plan was “hypothetical” and that the foundation held the home as an investment instead. That’s at odds with the foundation’s publicly available tax returns, which have listed the property as being used for charitable purposes. (Miller did not respond to a follow-up question asking about the discrepancy between her statements and the foundation’s tax returns.) As Colinvaux, the specialist in nonprofits, put it, “If it’s an investment asset, then it’s not a charitable use asset, and they shouldn’t be counting it as such” on their IRS filings.
In one similar instance involving another foundation, the IRS expressed hesitation about the organization’s plans, then backed off. In 2006, San Diego real estate magnate Matthew Strauss sought a $4 million write-off for the guesthouse that held part of his contemporary art collection. An IRS employee wrote that it appeared Strauss and his wife “are using the assets of the Foundation (the guest house gallery) as a facility for housing and displaying a large portion of their personal art collection for their enjoyment and benefit as well as the enjoyment and benefit of invited guests.” The employee wanted to know when real art would be donated, what kind of access the public would have to the gallery, and how the couple planned to inform people that they could visit, among other things.
The couple’s lawyer assured the IRS representative that she’d gotten the wrong impression. The Strausses would host no personal events there and the public would have access to view the collection “upon request.” The couple anticipated donating “substantially all” of their $50 million collection to the foundation. They couldn’t say when, but the couple planned to make donations “in a fashion that minimizes income taxes.”
As 2006 turned into 2007 with no sign that the IRS would bless its museum tax deduction, the couple sought political help. In January, the head of the IRS’ tax-exempt division received a letter from the office of Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D.-Calif.), inquiring about the delay in approving the application from the couple, who’d given her more than $15,000 over the past few election cycles. That June, their application was approved. (“The senator was not advocating in support of the constituent’s application, but instead requested clarification on the case after nine months of an inability to resolve the case,” a spokesperson for Feinstein said, noting that her office frequently sends such letters on behalf of constituents).
As of 2021, 15 years after the Strausses’ lawyer told the IRS they would donate $50 million in art, the foundation holds $6 million worth. The rest remained in a private trust.
To learn more about Strausses’ gallery, I tried to schedule a visit earlier this year. As with Carolands, I was able to get in, but it took some effort. The foundation’s website doesn’t list an address or hours of operation. A contact form available for visitors to inquire about tours wasn’t working when I tried it repeatedly. I ultimately had to pester employees of Strauss’ real estate company for a couple of weeks before someone responded and asked me to submit a biography for their boss to review. (My bio described me as a reporter with ProPublica, with the first coverage area listed as “tax policy.”)
Soon after I sent in my biography, I received a call from Matthew Strauss himself. After a brief conversation, he declared me “worthy” of the first tour he said he’d given in three years and sent along directions to the museum.
I didn’t see any signs outside the couple’s estate, nicknamed Rancho Del Arte, that indicated a museum could be found anywhere on the premises. From the outside, their guesthouse seemed relatively unassuming, its multimillion-dollar value betrayed only by the horse stables and privacy hedges of the nearby mansions I passed on the way in. A path wide enough for a golf cart wound its way through a grove of palm trees, past oversized sculptures and a private tennis court, to the Strausses’ own sprawling abode a hundred yards or so away.
The inside was more remarkable. The Strausses remodeled the building in the early 2000s with custom fixtures to illuminate works from their collection of contemporary art. Sounds and music from dueling audiovisual works on the main floor flooded the space, while the click-clack of a never-ending ping pong game echoed up from a conceptual piece in the basement. These noisier forms shared space with paintings on canvas and metal and with textured mixed-media compositions.
Dressed in sweats and sporting a Bentley baseball cap, Strauss personally led my solo tour, meandering from one prized possession to the next. He exhibited an uncanny memory for how he obtained each piece, likening the acquisition process to the thrill of a hunt. (“Once you get the fox, it’s not as much fun.”) He spoke of one painting as “my poor man’s ‘Mona Lisa’” and another as “my victory piece.”
Halfway through my visit, we stopped to take in the view from the museum’s balcony. “At this point, you can see why I had to buy this property,” he told me, explaining that he’d bought the guesthouse from his neighbor in the late 1990s to keep anyone else from moving in. “Anybody here, they would have knocked it down, and you know, really ruined our privacy.”
As the tour continued from room to room, Strauss leaned into his persona as a friendly professor. He asked probing questions about each modern piece before delving into centuries of art history. “I really show [people] how to look at art, I don’t just tell them ‘This is So-and-So,’” he said, recalling the tours he used to deliver to college students.
Before the pandemic, the foundation would conduct a dozen or two dozen tours each year, drawing a total of about 400 visitors to the gallery, according to the foundation’s website. But even as California’s other museums welcomed guests back in the spring of 2021, the foundation remained dormant.
Strauss acknowledges the tax benefits of having the foundation and maintained that he had made efforts to make his art available to the public. “I feel like I have an obligation to show it, but it’s got to be under favorable conditions,” he said. He’d told me he’d like to get tours going again, but only when schools and universities stop requiring masks and start treating COVID-19 “like normal.”
Strauss said he gets requests from individuals to see the collection “all the time.” But, he added, “to show one or two, it’s not worthy. It’ll wear me out.” Letting people come on their own was out of the question (they might damage the art), as was having regular public hours (it’s a zoning issue, he said, and the neighbors would never go for it). Strauss declined to respond to a list of follow-up questions that I sent after the tour.
A couple months from turning 90, Strauss was more focused on the big picture. Sooner or later, he said, he plans to deliver away most of the collection, which he estimates to be worth hundreds of millions of dollars. Most of his personal collection will go to the Museum of Contemporary Art San Diego, while the foundation’s assets will go to the University of California, San Diego under a deal that is in the process of being finalized.
As we made our way through the gallery, Strauss paused before a reproduction of a Life magazine cover featuring the 1964 World’s Fair in New York. Did anything catch my eye about it, he asked.
I stared for a moment.
“Why don’t you knock on it,” he suggested. “Maybe that’ll help you.”
Strauss sensed my hesitation to touch the art — he wanted me to see it was made of metal — and tried to put me at ease.
“You’re not supposed to,” he chuckled. “But this is my museum!”
For this story, ProPublica reviewed a nationwide database of parcels provided by the real estate data analytics firm Regrid to find homes owned by private foundations.
Wed, 26 Jul 2023 03:36:00 -0500entext/htmlhttps://www.propublica.org/article/how-private-nonprofits-ultrawealthy-tax-deductions-museums-foundation-artKillexams : Professional Actor Dogs Share Their Tricks and It's Pretty Amazing
There's always something so satisfying about seeing a well-trained dogs execute their tricks on command, and I mainly say this as a dog owner who has a dog that doesn't know the difference between "sit" and "lie down." On August 8, the TikTok account for @my.acting.crew posted a video of their super smart dogs executing these tricks, and boy oh boy, my dog could learn a thing or two.
Watch the following to see if your own pup is this well-trained.
Well, to be fair, these impressive pups are trained professionals so it makes sense they'd be so good at these! I'm still super jealous though. My dog's favorite command is to act like a total derp when I ask "Do you want a treat?"
TikTok users are equally impressed and @Ginnnny says, "Today I had to wrestle a piece of street pizza from my dachshund’s mouth." Sounds like something my dog would do. @Dumb adds, "My dog can sometimes sit down if she feels like it." Same, girl, same. @Morgan comments, "My dogs bark at falling leaves but that's adorable."
If you want to work on your own pup's training (And by you, I mean me) start by teaching your dog basic commands like "sit," "stay," "come," and "down." These commands establish the foundation for anything else you want to teach your dog. Socialization is equally important; expose your dog to various people, animals, environments, and situations to help them become well-adjusted and confident.
Also, make sure you have a lot of their favorite treats on hand and with patience, time and repetition, your own dog may well be on the way to becoming a professional dog actor too! Then they can pay for their own treats!
Looking for more PetHelpful updates? Follow us onYouTubefor more entertaining videos.Or, share your own adorable pet bysubmitting a video, and sign up for ournewsletterfor the latest pet updates and tips.
Wed, 09 Aug 2023 03:18:00 -0500en-UStext/htmlhttps://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/professional-actor-dogs-share-tricks-144000943.htmlKillexams : Business Communications, Inc. (BCI) Achieves Fortinet’s Engage Preferred Services Partner DesignationNo result found, try new keyword!BCI can also collaborate directly with Fortinet Professional Support experts on implementations to leverage Fortinet best-practices, resulting in increased expertise and visibility while ...Tue, 08 Aug 2023 01:38:00 -0500https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20230727828148/en/Business-Communications-Inc.-BCI-Achieves-Fortinet%E2%80%99s-Engage-Preferred-Services-Partner-Designation/Killexams : AirPods Pro 2 Tips and TricksNo result found, try new keyword!Apple added a speaker to the new AirPods Pro case in part to tell you when the case is charging, but Apple gives you an option to turn that off if you want to. Here's how to do it. Nothing's ...Wed, 05 Oct 2022 22:45:00 -0500entext/htmlhttps://appleinsider.com/inside/airpods-pro-2/tipsKillexams : Tips amd tricks from a Professional PetsitterNo result found, try new keyword!Is your dog social with other dogs ? ( daycare grooming playdates) If so , please check with your vet about the Boardatella vaccine for your dog Boadatella is a respitory virus that dogs can catch ...Fri, 21 Jul 2023 16:00:00 -0500en-ustext/htmlhttps://www.msn.com/Killexams : Fortinet Named a Challenger in the 2023 Gartner® Magic Quadrant™ for Single-Vendor SASENo result found, try new keyword!Additional Third-Party Recognition of FortiSASE Fortinet was also recently named a Leader in the Forrester Wave™: Zero Trust Edge Solutions, Q3 2023 report. Zero Trust Edge is also known as SASE, and ...Mon, 21 Aug 2023 04:21:00 -0500en-UStext/htmlhttps://www.tmcnet.com/usubmit/-fortinet-named-challenger-the-2023-gartnerreg-magic-quadranttrade-/2023/08/21/9867555.htmKillexams : PGA Tour’s Fortinet Championship: Silverado to deliver pro golfers a new test in Napa next month
There will be a new look to the Fortinet Championship, a PGA Tour event at Napa’s Silverado Resort and Spa in September that kicks off the FedExCup Fall schedule.
Easily access the very latest local news that matters in an app built for you. Read, see, and hear exclusive commentary, stunning photography,…
New will be the rerouting of the North Course, a par-72, 7,123-yard layout that presents a very difficult test with its narrow fairways and greens that challenge players with speed and slope. Holes 1-7 and No. 18 will remain as they have in year’s past. The other 10 holes, Nos. 8 through 17, are now part of a reconfiguration.
New will be on-site parking for spectators on the South Course at Silverado.
New will be a fan village, the entrance that welcomes spectators to the $8.4 million tournament, to be held Sept. 11-17.
“Each year we try to Boost upon the previous year, and this year is no exception,” said Andy McDowell, executive director of the tournament. “Enhancing the fan, sponsor, and player experience is a key priority for us. The new additions we’ve incorporated for this year’s tournament will really bring our event to the next level.”
People are also reading…
Two-time defending champion Max Homa leads a field of 156 players at the Fortinet Championship, one of seven official PGA Tour events during the 2023 FedExCup Fall. Homa won last year’s tournament when he holed out a pitch shot from 32 feet, 10 inches for birdie on the final hole. It was a dramatic finish on a day that had rain and wind, as Danny Willett three-putted for a bogey on the last hole to finish second.
“Winning is always fun. But getting to do it when you know the people associated with the event, when you know how much hard work was put into it, to have that kind of successes is one of those dream-come-true type moments,” said Homa, who also won the Farmers Insurance Open in January at Torrey Pines in San Diego.
Homa, who shot 16-under-par 272 last year at Silverado, said he is proud of the consistency that he has had during the 2022-23 season. He has nine top-10 finishes and tied for 10th at the Open Championship in July at Royal Liverpool, at Hoylake, Wirral, England. It was his first top-10 finish in a major.
“It’s always really nice to get off to a good start, getting a win at the Fortinet and feeling like your season is off and running,” Homa said at Fortinet Championship media day, on July 31, at Silverado. “You never know what you’re going to get in golf. So, it’s nice to know you still have it.
“This year has been great. I’m excited for the (FedExCup) playoffs … to keep the thing rolling. It has been a lot of hard work paying off. Feeling and seeing that consistency on a weekly basis has been big – something I just carry a lot of pride in.”
Homa has six wins in his PGA Tour career. He played in the Presidents Cup in 2022.
Playing in college at UC Berkeley, he was a two-time All-American and in 2013 won the Pac-12 Conference title and the NCAA Championship.
“If you have followed his career, he’s had trials and tribulations,” said Jim Overbeck, senior vice president of marketing at Fortinet. “He’s a grinder. He really just outworks the competition. He has no ego.”
Next month’s Fortinet Championship comes two weeks after the Tour Championship, Aug. 24-27, at East Lake Golf Club, in Atlanta. It’s the third and final event of the FedExCup Playoffs.
The Fortinet Championship is also two weeks before the Ryder Cup, Sept. 29-Oct. 1, at Marco Simone Golf & Country Club, in Rome.
“We’re primed for a pretty good field,” said Overbeck.
“I think we have a great spot on the calendar,” said McDowell. “For anyone who qualifies for the Ryder Cup, especially those who live out west ... we’re certainly going to promote this event as a great place to go before you head overseas, because I just don’t think guys are going to take 3½ weeks off. And for a lot of really good players who don’t go to Rome from the U.S., I just don’t see those guys taking six weeks off that early in the calendar.”
This marks the 10th year in a row of Silverado hosting the PGA Tour on the North Course, a picturesque, championship layout that was redesigned by Johnny Miller. Miller is a 25-time PGA Tour champion and was inducted into the World Golf Hall of Fame in 1998.
Silverado’s history with the PGA Tour dates back to the Kaiser International Open Invitational, from 1968-1976; followed by the Anheuser-Busch Golf Classic, from 1977-1980; Frys.com Open, 2014-2015; and the Safeway Open, from 2016-2020.
The Transamerica and Napa Valley Championship, both PGA Tour Champions events, were played at Silverado from 1989-2002. Silverado has also been the site of the PGA Tour’s national qualifying school.
This is the third year of the Fortinet Championship. The schedule for the week has pro-am events on Monday, Sept. 11 and Wednesday, Sept. 13, and practice rounds on Tuesday, Sept. 13. The first round of the tournament is Thursday, Sept. 14. The low 65 players, plus ties, make the 36-hole cut.
“It’s sort of our Super Bowl,” said Overbeck. “It’s been a great thing for Fortinet. Napa is such a great place. There’s about 40-something tournaments in the U.S., but there’s only one Napa. It’s a global destination. It’s a great place to be able to invite people to come learn about our brand, enjoy the experience, and it’s golf, it’s the food, it’s the wine, it’s the weather, it’s the people.
“So, it’s just great for our company to be able to associate with the Napa community and then with golf. It’s really unique.
“We want the community to be excited about what we’re doing. We’re trying to do our best to make sure that they have a good experience.”
The benefits to winning during the FedExCup Fall are big – including a two-year PGA Tour exemption, 500 FedExCup points, entry to the season-opening Sentry Tournament of Champions and the Players Championship, as well as eligibility into those major championships that have invited Tour winners in the past, the PGA Tour announced in a press release in the spring.
Additionally, players can use the seven fall events to secure or Boost their positions in the priority ranking and also wrap up additional playing opportunities for the 2024 FedExCup Season, which will return to a calendar-year schedule (January-August), the Tour reported.
New this year, the Tour said in a press release, is players ranked No. 51 and beyond will carry their FedExCup points from the regular season and first playoffs event into the FedExCup Fall and continue to accumulate FedExCup points to finalize eligibility for the 2024 season.
Golf Channel and NBC will televise the Fortinet Championship.
“Players have the chance to secure or Boost their playing status and earn additional benefits for the following season, and we are confident a number of top performers will continue to support events that have traditionally fit into their respective schedules. We appreciate the commitment and support of all of our title sponsors and tournament organizers in working together to produce an exciting and meaningful conclusion to 2023,” PGA Tour President Tyler Dennis said in a press release.
McDowell and Overbeck were joined at media day by Frank LaRosa, the event emcee who is from Sacramento. La Rosa has a radio show, “Golf To Go,” on KHTK Sports 1140 AM in Sacramento. He is also a board member with two organizations – California Golf Writers & Broadcasters Association and the Northern California PGA Foundation.
Last year’s Fortinet Championship was the opener of the PGA Tour’s 2022-2023 schedule.
It’s been a very good year for Homa, who is No. 4 in both the FedexCup Regular Season Points and FedExCup Standings, No. 7 in Ryder Cup Points, and No. 7 in the Official World Golf Ranking.
“I’m looking forward to being back up in Napa in a couple months,” Homa said.
He is also looking forward to seeing the rerouting of the course. According to a press release announcing the changes, the North Course was rerouted to make the final stretch of holes more accessible to pedestrians, highlight the course’s signature par-3 down the stretch, and provide room for growth in future years for additional activations, spectator seating, and private hospitality offerings.
Ten holes will be played in a different order.
The signature par-3 on the course – member’s No. 11 – will now become tournament No. 17, the tournament announced.
“No. 11 is the most iconic par-3 on the course,” said McDowell. “It’s a beautiful hole. It was not really seen very often on TV, especially late in the round.”
Furthermore, Nos. 8 (previously 12), 9 (previously 13), 10 (previously 14), 11 (previously 15), 12 (previously 16), 13 (previously 17), 14 (previously 8), 15 (previously 9), 16 (previously 10) and 17 (previously 11) are part of the rerouting.
“I’m going to have to see what they changed and get a feel for that before I can develop a new strategy,” said Homa. “It’s in an area I love. I like my chances and I think I’ll figure it out alright. It’s going take me probably a time or two to get used to it, but I like the sound of it.”
Coming up this month on the PGA Tour are the FedExCup Playoffs. The top 70 players in the FedExCup standings qualify for the first playoffs event, the FedEx St. Jude Championship, Aug. 10-13, at TPC Southwind, in Memphis, TN.
“It’s a cool time of the year with the playoffs upcoming,” said Homa. “But it’s kind of like anything else: you put your head down and put one foot in front of the other. Just keep doing what you’ve been doing. It’s easy to think to get ahead of yourself and get overly amped up and excited. But at the end of the day, what got you here is that process-based mindset – just put the work in and trust that it’s going to work when the bell goes off. So that’s what my plan is.
“It’s been really fun to see the short game last year really pick up the pace quite a bit. And that’s carried over into this season. The putting this year has been great. It’s been really consistent. I’ve had a lot of great putting weeks that have helped me be in the mix and win a couple of events.”
Today in sports history: Aug. 5
1936: Jesse Owens wins his third of four gold medals
1984: Joan Benoit wins the first Olympic marathon for women
1991: Sergei Bubka becomes the first to clear 20 feet outdoors in the pole vault
1997: Michael Johnson wins his third straight 400-meter title
2005: Jason Gore shoots a 12-under 59
2007: Lorena Ochoa wins the Women’s British Open
2007: Tom Glavine earns his 300th victory
2012: Usain Bolt claims consecutive gold medals in the marquee track and field event
2012: Serena and Venus Williams win the doubles title
2013: Alex Rodriguez is suspended through 2014
2014: San Antonio Spurs hire WNBA star Becky Hammon as an assistant coach
2017: Justin Gatlin spoils Usain Bolt’s farewell beating him in the 100 meters
2018: Georgia Hall of England catches Pornanong Phatlum in a final-round duel