Read these LCP-001 questions and answers before the actual test

Try not to download and squander your precious energy on free LCP-001 Test Prep that are given on the web. Those are out of date and obsolete stuff. Visit killexams.com to download 100 percent free practice questions before you register for a complete duplicate of LCP-001 question bank containing actual test LCP-001 braindumps and VCE practice test. Peruse and Pass. No exercise in futility and cash.

LCP-001 Linux Certified Professional (LCP) Powered by LPI learner | http://babelouedstory.com/

LCP-001 learner - Linux Certified Professional (LCP) Powered by LPI Updated: 2024

Ensure your success with this LCP-001 dumps question bank
Exam Code: LCP-001 Linux Certified Professional (LCP) Powered by LPI learner January 2024 by Killexams.com team

LCP-001 Linux Certified Professional (LCP) Powered by LPI

Exam Details for LCP-001 Linux Certified Professional (LCP) Powered by LPI:

Number of Questions: The LCP-001 test typically consists of 60 multiple-choice questions.

Time Limit: The test has a time limit of 90 minutes (1 hour and 30 minutes).

Course Outline:
The LCP-001 Linux Certified Professional certification test focuses on assessing the knowledge and skills required to effectively work with Linux operating systems. The course outline covers the following key topics:

1. Linux System Architecture and Installation:
- Understanding Linux kernel and distributions
- Linux file system hierarchy
- Installation and package management
- Boot process and system initialization
- Kernel modules and device management

2. GNU and Unix Commands:
- Essential command-line utilities
- File and directory manipulation
- File permissions and ownership
- Shell scripting and automation
- Text processing and filtering

3. Devices, Linux Filesystems, and the Filesystem Hierarchy Standard:
- Device files and device management
- Disk partitioning and file system creation
- File system maintenance and repair
- Mounting and unmounting file systems
- File system hierarchy and standard directories

4. System Operation and Maintenance:
- User and group management
- Process management and job scheduling
- System monitoring and performance tuning
- System logging and troubleshooting
- Backup and recovery strategies

5. Networking Fundamentals:
- TCP/IP networking concepts
- Network configuration and troubleshooting
- Network services and protocols
- Security and firewall configuration
- Remote access and SSH

Exam Objectives:
The LCP-001 test aims to assess the following objectives:

1. Understanding of Linux system architecture, distributions, and installation procedures.
2. Proficiency in using GNU and Unix commands for file manipulation, text processing, and shell scripting.
3. Knowledge of managing devices, Linux file systems, and adhering to the Filesystem Hierarchy Standard.
4. Competence in system operation and maintenance tasks, including user management, process monitoring, and troubleshooting.
5. Familiarity with networking fundamentals, network configuration, and security measures in Linux.

Exam Syllabus:
The LCP-001 test covers the following syllabus:

1. Linux System Architecture and Installation
- Understanding Linux kernel and distributions
- Linux file system hierarchy
- Installation and package management
- Boot process and system initialization
- Kernel modules and device management

2. GNU and Unix Commands
- Essential command-line utilities
- File and directory manipulation
- File permissions and ownership
- Shell scripting and automation
- Text processing and filtering

3. Devices, Linux Filesystems, and the Filesystem Hierarchy Standard
- Device files and device management
- Disk partitioning and file system creation
- File system maintenance and repair
- Mounting and unmounting file systems
- File system hierarchy and standard directories

4. System Operation and Maintenance
- User and group management
- Process management and job scheduling
- System monitoring and performance tuning
- System logging and troubleshooting
- Backup and recovery strategies

5. Networking Fundamentals
- TCP/IP networking concepts
- Network configuration and troubleshooting
- Network services and protocols
- Security and firewall configuration
- Remote access and SSH
Linux Certified Professional (LCP) Powered by LPI
GAQM Professional learner

Other GAQM exams

CSTE Certified Software Test Engineer (CSTE-001)
CSSGB Certified Six Sigma Green Belt 2023
BPM-001 Business Process Manager (BPM)
CEH-001 Certified Ethical Hacker (CEH v.11)
CLSSBB Certified Lean Six Sigma Black Belt (CLSSBB)
CLSSGB Certified Lean Six Sigma Green Belt (CLSSGB)
CSM-001 Certified Scrum Master (CSM)
CLSSYB Certified Lean Six Sigma Yellow Belt (CLSSYB)
LCP-001 Linux Certified Professional (LCP) Powered by LPI
CPD-001 Certified Project Director (CPD)
CDCS-001 Certified Data Centre Specialist (CDCS) R18
CCCP-001 Certified Cloud Computing Professional (CCP)
CLSSMBB Lean Six Sigma Master Black Belt
CBAF-001 Certified Business Analyst Foundation
CPEH-001 Certified Professional Ethical Hacker (CPEH)
CTFL Certified Software Tester - Foundation Level (CSTFL)
CDCP-001 Certified Data Center Professional
ISO27-13-001 ISO 27001:2023 - Certified Lead Auditor
ISO-ISMS-LA ISO 27001:2023 ISMS - Certified Lead Auditor
CTL-001 Certified Team Leader (CTL) Certification
ISO-31000-CLA ISO 31000 - Certified Lead Risk Manager
CTIL-001 Certified Software Tester - Intermediate Level (CSTIL)

We have Tested and Approved LCP-001 Exams. killexams.com gives the exact and most accurate IT test materials which practically contain all information focuses. With the guide of our LCP-001 test materials, you don't have to spend time on several books but simply need to burn through 10-20 hours to ace our LCP-001 dumps of braindump questions and answers.
GAQM
LCP-001
Linux Certified Professional (LCP) Powered by LPI
https://killexams.com/pass4sure/exam-detail/LCP-001
Question: 284
Which option to the tee command will cause the output to be concatenated on the end of the
output file instead of overwriting the existing file contents?
A. -a
B. -c
C. -no-clobber
D. -continue
Answer: A
Question: 285
The system configuration file namedis commonly used to set the default runlevel. (Please
provide the fill name with full path information)
Answer:
Answer:
/etc/inittab
Question: 286
Which of the following commands will write a message to the terminals of all logged in
users?
A. bcast
B. mesg
C. print
D. wall
E. yell
Answer: D
Question: 287
Which of the following explanations are valid reasons to run a command in the background
of your shell?
A. The command does not need to execute immediately.
B. The command has to run immediately but the user needs to log out.
C. The system is being shut down and the command needs to restart execution immediately
after the reboot.
D. The command can run at a lower priority than normal commands run on the command
line.
Answer: B
Question: 288
The system configuration file namedis commonly used to set the default runlevel. (Please
provide the fill name with full path information)
Answer:
/etc/inittab
Question: 289
In the vi editor, which of the following commands will copy the current line into the vi
buffer?
A. c
B. cc
C. 1c
D. yy
E. 1y
Answer: D
Question: 290
Which program updates the database that is used by the locate command?
Answer:
updatedb
/usr/bin/updatedb
Question: 291
What does the + symbol mean in the following grep regular expression: grep '^d[aei]\+d$'
/usr/share/dict/words
A. Match the preceding character set ([aei]) one or more times.
B. Match the preceding character set ([aei]) zero or more times.
C. Match the preceding character set ([aei]) zero or one times.
D. Match a literal + symbol.
Answer: D
Explanation:
The answer should be Match a literal + symbol because there is a backslash symbol
before the plus, so it should match a literal +.
Question: 292
Instead of supplying an explicit device in /etc/fstab for mounting, what other options may be
used to identify the intended partition? (Select TWO correct answers)
A. FIND
B. ID
C. LABEL
D. NAME
E. UUID
Answer: C, E
For More exams visit https://killexams.com/vendors-exam-list
Kill your test at First Attempt....Guaranteed!

GAQM Professional learner - BingNews https://killexams.com/pass4sure/exam-detail/LCP-001 Search results GAQM Professional learner - BingNews https://killexams.com/pass4sure/exam-detail/LCP-001 https://killexams.com/exam_list/GAQM Customized Professional Learning for Schools

In conjunction with the Professional Learning Cycles, the team at your school/district will receive implementation support from a PCE consultant with school and coaching experience to guide the implementation of the work in classrooms.

The PCE consultant will also provide text set recommendations for staff,  customize student materials recommendations and answer any questions throughout the process. 

Thu, 30 Nov 2023 21:49:00 -0600 en text/html https://www.bc.edu/bc-web/schools/lynch-school/sites/professional-continuing-education/learners/k-12/Customized-programs.html.html
Capital Education Institute

Create hubs of innovation: A guiding principle in our work is to create synergies in order to maximize educators’ ability to respond to students’ needs and interests in creative, rigorous, and differentiated ways. The vast intellectual resources of the university and the numerous professionals that we prepare for the region provide us with unique leverage to provide interdisciplinary, research-based responses to the region’s teaching and learning issues and challenges.

Conduct research to inform program development and instruction in our educator preparation programs: Research associates affiliated with CapEd, including a Pathways Research Fellow, conducts a range of research on effective practice for preparing future educators. This research informs the curriculum and instruction in our programs preparing future teachers, special educators, school counselors, school psychologists, school nurses, and school social workers.

A sampling of our research:

CapEd sponsors research that marshals faculty expertise, provides students with research experiences, and addresses issues of concern to the region’s educational community. Current research efforts are focused on school climate at a local school, school violence and factors shaping violence prevention and mitigation, and interventions that effectively support English learners with academic writing in high school.

Enhance in-service educator professional learning: Faculty associated with our educator preparation programs routinely engage with in-service educators to share current research, use this research to collaboratively develop applications to pressing problems of practice, and hone skills and expertise so that students are better served and professionals increase their knowledge base and their connection to their fields.

A sampling of our professional learning offerings:

An interprofessional faculty team with expertise in educational leadership, school counseling, and inclusive educational practices is working with a large, comprehensive high school to identify key educational equity issues that will be the focus of their 2019-2020 WASC self-study. Working collaboratively with the school’s Equity Leadership Team, we are surveying students, conducting document analysis, and engaging focus groups.

A faculty team with experts in child/adolescent development, school counseling, and special education is implementing a professional learning series on inclusive practices, particularly related to SB 48, for teachers, parents and school board members associated with a specific charter school district.

A faculty team with expertise in mathematics, science, computer science, and Universal Design for Learning is offering a 5 day summer institute to elementary school teachers interested in best practices for NGSS-aligned, inclusive instruction.
School counseling experts delivered professional learning sessions to high school counselors in a local district to increase their capacity to advise for college/career pathways and to mitigate the summer slump.

Contribute to effective and equitable systems: We partner closely with school districts and agencies serving students and families throughout our region. This vantage point allows us to understand the systemic issues facing our educational partners. Using research and inquiry techniques, we support our partners to develop solutions that can transform systems.

Some of our systems work includes:

Using a nationally-validated survey instrument, we are conducting an exit survey for a partner district to assist them with better understanding patterns of teacher attrition and retention.

With tools from the Society for Human Resource Management, we are working with a local district to better align its new teacher on-boarding practices and protocols as a way to Strengthen teacher retention and efficacy.

As part of a long-term partnership, we are working with local district staff to bring standardization and rigor to its support of schools as they develop their annual Single Plan for Student Achievement.

Sun, 11 Aug 2019 05:47:00 -0500 en text/html https://www.csus.edu/college/education/engagement/capital-education-institute.html
KQED for Educators

Amplify student voice through media making and authentic audience. These free, ready-to-use, standards-aligned projects empower your students to share their ideas through audio, video or images that are published on the public Challenge showcase.

Learn More
Thu, 08 Jun 2023 22:35:00 -0500 en-us text/html https://www.kqed.org/education/
Best Practices for Student Professional Conduct

Best Practices for Student Professional Conduct

This document is intended to supplement the UAB Marnix E. Heersink School of Medicine Student Code of Professional Conduct. It is not a substitution for the general ideals and principles outlined in the Code of Professional Conduct. Instead, it is meant to provide a framework with which students, faculty, and staff can think about the practical application of the Code of Professional Conduct. Additionally, this document provides a shared way of talking about the Code of Conduct to foster a sense of communal commitment and understanding. 

The best practices presented in this document are not intended to be comprehensive or necessarily prescriptive. Instead, they serve as a diagnostic tool to facilitate adherence to the Code of Professional Conduct in order that we might maintain the highest standards of excellence, support the healthy development of future physicians, and maintain the primary importance of patient welfare. 

A final note: In the same way patients are best served by members of the healthcare team who seek out others to discuss, learn from, debate with, and look at the patient’s condition from a variety of angles, the same is true when using this document. Issues of conduct, professionalism, and behavior are as complex and diverse as the people they involve, and, except in the most extreme cases, they are multi-layered and often without clear answers. We are all better served when conversations about the ideals and principles in the Code of Conduct — and the elements of this best practices document — are discussed together.

Respect for Ourselves 

We commit to self-evaluation and developing the necessary skills to ensure we are engaged in self-care, particularly in times of increased intensity and stress.

  • We will learn how to manage stress and recognize the symptoms of burnout, so that we can mitigate the long-term ramifications to our personal selves and our careers.

  • We will develop the skills we need to engage in-the-moment wellness that will help us stay engaged in medical education and training.

We embrace asking for help and seeking out resources to assist us in maintaining our mental, physical, and emotional health and well-being. 

  • We will normalize help-seeking behaviors and take advantage of the resources available to us as students. 

  • We will be open to talking about the things going on in our lives, with classmates, faculty, and staff, and listening to others when they need to talk. 

We will approach all situations of patient care, whether educational simulations or clinical settings, with clear minds so that our focus can be on learning and providing the best possible care.

  •  We will recognize that our personal lives could affect our abilities to care for patients in the most effective way or engage in learning. This means, at times, we will choose to prioritize education and patient care.

    • This might include: refraining from over consuming alcohol during clinical times; refraining completely from use of non-prescribed stimulants; using prescribed stimulants in the proper manner and dosage; to the extent possible, getting adequate sleep during times of patient care. 

Respect for our Classmates 

Maintaining respect and dignity for our fellow students, whether in-person or online. 

  • We understand that others do not necessarily share our personal experiences and beliefs, and we recognize the validity and importance bringing a variety of voices into conversations. 

  • We will not tolerate discrimination in any forms. This includes, but not limited to cultural, religious, personal beliefs; gender; sexual orientation and identity; disability; race and ethnicity; and age.

  • We will speak up against discrimination, in any form. 

  • We will purposefully strive to interact with classmates who are different from ourselves.

  • We will refrain from using social media as an outlet to express our opinions and feelings about our classmates and colleagues.

  • We understand that social networks are public domain and that comments made in these forums regarding other students can have personal and professional ramifications.

Respect our classmates’ learning experience.

  • We will demonstrate respect for our classmates and instructors by being punctual and prepared for activities. 

  • We will engage in group work, ensuring that all are contributing appropriately. 

  • We will be aware of how our actions may affect others in group. 

    • Sometimes this might mean taking a step back, so that others may equally share roles in team activities.

Foster a collaborative environment and community that builds each other up.

  • We will support our classmates through sharing appropriate learning resources that have been helpful to us.

  • We will strive to support rather than impede others. We are all one team!

    • Unhealthy competitive behaviors and actions only negatively influence everyone’s experience in medical school.
  • We will be aware that other stressors may compound the stress of medical education and training. 

  • If we notice a classmate is struggling, we will offer to help as much as we are able, including guiding them to the appropriate resources.

  • We will strive to assist classmates in maintaining a positive image in all social and public environments.

  • We will be aware that our actions as a representative of the school may affect how our peers are viewed. 

    • We will maintain our professional identity for the sake of our classmates and ourselves. 

Respect for our Educators and School 

We recognize that being a student of the Heersink School of Medicine means we are part of an organization larger than ourselves with a history, reputation, and impact that extends beyond our time as students. 

  • We will strive to set positive examples for students in classes below our own, and for students who will enter medical school after us.  

  • We recognize that, as ambassadors of the school, we determine how others view our institution in the present and years to come.

  • We will take the initiative to reach out and be transparent when seeking clarification or advice.

  • We will choose to be kind during in-person interactions and correspondence.

We accept that being part of a large, multi-faceted organization means there are rules, policies, and procedures we adhere to, even if the reasons seem unclear. 

We embrace the work of seeking the best for our school, and we commit ourselves to seek clarification, challenge ideas and current thinking, provide feedback, and ask questions in ways that are professional and constructive. 

  • We will always strive for positive improvements at our institution.

  • After communicating a grievance, we will allow a reasonable amount of time (48 hours) for a response, before reaching out again.

    • When we are dissatisfied or have a complaint, we will criticize the action and not the person, whether an instructor or classmate. Refrain from using inflammatory language and making assumptions about their interactions. 
    • When possible, offer solutions.
    • Follow professional guidelines for submitting a complaint or concern.
    • When in doubt, seek a third party to proofread correspondence.

We accept that we are both represented by and representatives of the Heersink School of Medicine, and that external individuals and groups may base their judgements and perceptions of the School on their interactions and perceptions of us. 

  • We will be mindful that our in-person and social media presence reflects on ourselves, but also the school of medicine, as a whole.

  • We will conduct ourselves online the same as we do in person.

  • We will be respectful and mindful of others, on and off campus.

We welcome the tension that comes with navigating personal autonomy while knowing our decisions and actions may reflect on our classmates, faculty, and administration. 

  • As ambassadors of the School, our actions can reflect back on the school in positive and negative ways.

  • We will exercise professional judgement in our words, whether spoken aloud or posted online.

    • Recognize that while our thoughts and opinions are valid, they may not reflect the views of the entire class.

    • In all public statements, acknowledge that opinions are our own and do not necessarily reflect those of the students, faculty, staff, and administration of the Heersink School of Medicine, nor the University of Alabama at Birmingham. 

  • Before posting criticisms of the School of Medicine or calls for change/action online, we will seek guidance from appropriate faculty, staff, or classmates about how and when to express frustration.

We acknowledge that the faculty, staff, and administration are professionals here to help us reach our goals, and we will keep this partnership and professional relationship in focus, particularly when we have disagreements or are providing feedback.

  • We seek to always provide feedback in a way that is constructive and direct. 

    • Use professional and non-accusatory language when providing feedback.
  • We will be clear and considerate when communicating with others

  • When there is a disagreement, we will attempt to remain open-minded of others’ opinions to promote a thoughtful discussion that will reach a positive solution.

  • Where there are disagreements and we are uncomfortable with speaking with someone, we will find an appropriate third party to help facilitate the discussion.

Respect for our Patients 

We recognize the centrality of the physician-patient relationship, which forms the basis for effective care and treatment.

  • We will not seek to build relationships with patients outside of the appropriate student/doctor-patient context.

  • We will allow the patient’s best interest to guide all our decision making and communication.

  • We realize that it is our responsibility to communicate clearly for the purpose of patient education and compliance. When we are not satisfied with the level of patient understanding, we will respectfully find the best communication strategy to achieve our goal for the care of the patient.

  • When presented with the opportunity to reflect on our own preconceived notions, we will remain mindful that each of us has biases (unconscious or conscious) and will dedicate time to addressing such issues.

We will model the highest levels of professional behavior during patient encounters, whether simulated or real. We will show respect for our patients with all modes of action and behavior. For example:

  • We will speak respectfully to our patients.

  • We will communicate to others about patients with the highest level of respect.

  • We will use best practices for facilitating rapport and trust, including body language cues.

  • We will adhere to the standards of dress laid out by the Heersink School of Medicine, as well as those from the clinical settings in which we work.

We will adhere to the legal standards of privacy (regard for the privacy of the person) and confidentiality (protection of their health-related information) as we learn the nuances and complexities of patient confidentiality in real-world situations and cases.

  • We will adhere to HIPAA and all relevant state and federal policies pertaining to patient privacy.

  • As applicable to our clinical training, we will adhere to the policies of the various hospitals in Birmingham, on the regional campuses, and clinical facilities in which we are working. 

  • We will maintain respect of our patients’ privacy in the test room, hallway, and outside of the encounter.

We embrace both the unique tensions of a changing world with new technologies and recognize the timeless responsibility physicians have to guard patient information.

  • We will not divulge patient information, including photographs, on any form of social media, unregulated electronic communication, or other digital platform without the written legal consent of the patient or representative.

Respect for our patients is vital for their health outcomes and instrumental for developing an appropriate patient-doctor relationship. Establishing and maintaining respect should be a priority throughout each of our encounters in medical school, setting a firm foundation for our careers. 

  • We acknowledge the potential harms of preconceived notions about our patients before and throughout our interactions, remaining mindful that they could undermine the physician-patient relationship.

  • We acknowledge our lived experiences might be different from those of our patients. We will refrain from judgment about their words, actions, or beliefs that might detract from the quality of care we provide.

Understand that the time we spend with each patient is essential for providing the best care and both the patient and providers are using valuable time to be present. Both the patient and the student are committing their time to any encounter, and both time commitments are equally worthy of respect. We acknowledge that no time spent caring for patients is wasted.

  • We will seek assistance from supervisors when in need of help to provide best care.

  • We acknowledge the responsibility to be transparent about any lack of skill or knowledge that could potentially harm a patient. 

  • We seek to learn and grow as physicians, and we recognize that it is at times crucial to seek external guidance and information to that end.

Respect for Profession

Maintain a professional presentation within the institution and beyond.

  • We will use professional language when interacting with patients, peers, and other members of the health care team.

  • We will maintain a professional appearance, in accordance with the stated dress code, for all clinical interactions.

  • We will show respect for educational settings and the learning environment as a professional learner.

  • We will maintain a professional online presence, recognizing our role as a representative of our School and our profession.

Continuously strive to Strengthen the field of medicine and healthcare for all

  • We will demonstrate commitment to curiosity, self-improvement, and lifelong learning. 

  • We will work to maintain an updated clinical and scientific knowledge base.

  • We will work to advance knowledge by asking questions of unsolved problems.

  • We embrace our role as a teacher through sharing knowledge with patients , classmates, and colleagues.

Recognize the “opportunity, responsibility, and obligation” of the practice of medicine

  • We will recognize our limitations, and will ask for help when needed

  • We will express interest and engagement towards our roles and responsibilities

  • We will respond with tact, empathy, and understanding when caring for patients and interacting with classmates and colleagues.

  • We understand the unique pressures and sacrifice required of our profession that at times may require prioritizing patient care over personal preferences.

  • We will prioritize mutual respect and productive conversation when differences of opinion occur.

Best Practices for Addressing Acts of Misconduct

The complete process and procedures for addressing acts of misconduct can be found in the Student Code of Professional Conduct. While some of the below information is duplicated from the Code of Conduct document, the purpose of this section is to provide some operational and theoretical best practices for how these processes will be followed in the event of a reported act of misconduct. 

  • The Heersink School of Medicine will conduct a thorough investigation of any reported violation of the Student Code of Professional Conduct.

  • The following questions will direct the investigation.1

    • Act: Was there a potential violation?

    • Knowledge: Did the student know, or should a reasonable student have known that the Act was a violation?

    • Significance: Would tolerating the Act damage the honesty and integrity of our profession or community?
      1Adapted from the University at Buffalo Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences https://medicine.buffalo.edu/orientation/checklist/code-professional-conduct.html 

  • The goal of addressing violations of the Student Code of Professional Conduct will always be the personal and professional growth of the individual(s) involved. However, there may be instances when the behavior is egregious and considered a violation of these standards.  As a result, a student may be sanctioned or dismissed.

Best Practices for Student Engagement with the Code of Professional Conduct

  • Students are introduced to the school’s Code of Professional Conduct and best practices, expectations for learner, faculty, and support staff professional behavior, and mechanisms available for reporting unprofessional behavior including mistreatment at the beginning of medical school. This statement, policies, expectations for professional behavior and the reporting mechanisms are covered in detail again prior to the start of clinical coursework during orientation to the clerkships. 

  • Students attest to reviewing the Code of Professional Conduct and best practices document during the mandatory annual student credentialing process.  Students are reminded of reporting mechanisms during orientation to each preclinical and clinical course, on the School of Medicine’s websites, and through digital signage in Volker Hall.

Sun, 26 Jul 2020 12:58:00 -0500 en-US text/html https://www.uab.edu/medicine/home/current-students/policies-procedures/medical-student-code-of-conduct-best-practices
Exploring the Advantages of Learning with a Programming Tutor No result found, try new keyword!In this article, we’ll explore the answers to these questions and more, including what the difference is between coding and programming, the advantages of learning programming, and the top programming ... Thu, 04 Jan 2024 10:00:00 -0600 en-us text/html https://www.msn.com/ Cambridge University to offer short online courses for professionals

Copyright 2024 BBC. All rights reserved.  The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read about our approach to external linking.

Beta Terms By using the Beta Site, you agree that such use is at your own risk and you know that the Beta Site may include known or unknown bugs or errors, that we have no obligation to make this Beta Site available with or without charge for any period of time, nor to make it available at all, and that nothing in these Beta Terms or your use of the Beta Site creates any employment relationship between you and us. The Beta Site is provided on an “as is” and “as available” basis and we make no warranty to you of any kind, express or implied.

In case of conflict between these Beta Terms and the BBC Terms of Use these Beta Terms shall prevail.

Tue, 18 May 2021 07:01:00 -0500 text/html https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-cambridgeshire-57148715
From hook to landing: mastering learning experience design for lasting impact

In their 2006 book, The Experience Economy, Pine & Gilmore suggested that experiences were the basis of our economy. More interesting, to me, was the claim that the next economy would be the transformation economy. That is, experiences that change us in ways that we want, or need, to be developed. This, I suggest, is what we do! At least, when we’re on our game. I think there are two different ways in which we may not be. Further, there are good resources to address the first, but the second is an area we really can be better at.

Learning Experience Design is where we elegantly integrate learning science with engagement

Learning Experience Design, LXD, is where we elegantly integrate learning science with engagement. That is, we have to do good instruction, but we also have empirical evidence from researchers like Lepper that when learners are engaged, the outcomes are better. Fortunately, there’s a growing awareness of the importance of learning science, with early books like that of Clark & Mayer’s eLearning and the Science of Instruction, now being complemented by excellent tomes from Dirksen, Neelen & Kirschner, and others. Even my next-to-most-recent tome talked about Learning Science for Instructional Designers.

Which leaves us with the other side, engagement – the emotional side of the story, where ‘emotion’ is a shorthand for the elements of creating motivation, keeping anxiety in check, and building confidence. In cognitive science, they recognise conation as a complement to cognition, where conation represents the intention to learn.  Learning works better when the learners are committed. This comes from recognising the value of the learning, not being afraid to try, and persisting through to achieve the end result.

In instructional design theory, Keller, with his ARCS model (Attention, Relevance, Confidence, and Satisfaction) is really the only person to address this side of the equation, and we need more. In my most accurate tome, Make It Meaningful, I’ve built upon Self-Determination Theory (Deci and Ryan), and combined it with early experience and research on games, complemented by explorations of interface design, fiction, surprise, and more, to develop an understanding that can be reliably applied.

I start by proposing that there are two major elements: the hook, and the landing (leveraging a fishing metaphor, possibly badly as I’m not a fishing person). Each of these has its own elements, though they’re related. Getting these right, and integrated with an effective learning science plan, yields an outcome that can be truly transformative.

The hook

What conation tells us is that people have to commit to the learning experience. I suggest that it takes three elements, that learners have to:

  • agree that being able to perform in this new way is of value
  • recognise that they don’t already know how
  • believe that this experience will change that situation

These are all typically assumed and not specifically addressed, to the detriment of the experience. So, how do we do this?

To start, there has to be real value to the learner. There has to have been sufficient analysis to determine that this is necessary and not yet known. Trying to build engagement for something that doesn’t have a clear benefit to the learner is a wasted exercise. We shouldn’t be building courses that don’t have a clear outcome anyway!

Once there’s clear benefit, you need to make this manifest to the learner. I suggest that an obvious way is to demonstrate the consequences of having this skill, or of not having it. So, we can show the positive consequences possible with this ability, or what can go wrong if it’s not in our skillset. We can do this humorously or dramatically, but showing these outcomes is a clear indication of the rationale for this learning.

An obvious way is to demonstrate the consequences of having this skill, or of not having it

So, for instance, we can show the benefits of knowing how to change a bed with a patient in it, or the consequences of not knowing how to successfully execute a financial transaction on the part of a customer. We match the positive or negative, and dramatic or comedic, to the audience.

There are many situations (though not all) where our learners may already believe they know this. In the case of a sales team, for example, they were overly-confident in their ability to sell trucks. We had to create an evidence-gathering scenario, which they wouldn’t fully explore, and a subsequent feature quiz, which they would consequently do horrid on, before they were ready to listen to the message. If learners believe they know the material, they will have to be dissuaded of the notion before they’re ready to commit.

The last part would be easy, if we had developed trust with our learners on the quality and impact of the experience. Unfortunately, as I have seen way too often, learners will only tolerate, or even actively avoid, most formal learning. I believe that’s largely because we’ve delivered courses that are heavy on information and low on meaningful practice, and we have lost their confidence. We may have to exert considerable effort to rectify the situation until they learn to see that we are prepared to deliver transformation!

The landing

That transformation comes from delivering on the promise the hook proposed. While you want to maintain the motivation you’ve built, you also need to keep anxiety under control. While retention and transfer are our formal learning goals, I’ll suggest that developing sufficient confidence so that learners will apply the learning after the learning experience is also necessary. These, then are the elements that we need to address. I will address one major component that drives both learning outcomes and engagement: practice.

From books like Brown, Roediger, and McDaniel’s Make It Stick, we’ve learned that sufficient practice is a necessity for learning. We also know from books like Ericsson’s Peak that we need appropriate challenge that matches the difficulty to the learner’s current ability. Not coincidentally, what makes for good learning also makes for engagement, as we see from an alignment between Vygotsky’s concept of the Zone of Proximal Development, and Csíkszentmihályi’s explorations of creating an experience of Flow.

The task embedded in those contexts needs to authentically reflect what they’ll need to do after the learning experience

Several factors come together to design compelling experiences. The setting has to be one that learners viscerally understand are situations like they’ll face, even if they’re set in fantastic environments (medieval, western, outer space, etc.). Also, the task embedded in those contexts needs to authentically reflect what they’ll need to do after the learning experience. The level of additional material needs to be minimal, merely enough to convey the context, without overloading their cognitive resources. We also need the consequences and the feedback that reinforces the right answer and explains why wrong answers are understandable but inappropriate.

In addition, we need the right suite of practice. We need a path of practice that gradually builds in challenge level, is spaced out over time, and is varied. Further, we need the practice to be across sufficient contexts to support appropriate transfer.

Then we need the minimal content to support success on the practice. This, cognitively, consists of models and examples. Models explain how the world works in this domain, providing a basis for choosing a course of action based upon the outcomes of this decision or that. Examples illustrate those models in context. Adding in engagement, those examples should be compelling stories. We should also show learner progress, building confidence and indicating where they are in the process.

We’ll also want a closing that concludes the experience that the introductory hook opened up. We want to acknowledge effort, celebrate accomplishments, and point to deeper and further directions. We may drill back up from the current context to the bigger picture, which Reigeluth’s Elaboration Theory tells us we should do the reverse of to begin the experience.

There’s more. You have to ensure that the learning isn’t extinguished, for one. Supervisors or managers, reward policies, and so on, can interfere with the outcomes of a successful transformation. You can’t get sales teams to do solution selling if you’re still rewarding the number of widgets sold, and managers’ “that’s not how we do it here” attitude can effectively squelch even the best-designed interventions. Dirksen’s new book, Talk to the Elephant, elegantly addresses those issues.

Completing the picture

To fully deliver on the experience, you need to understand the detailed implications for the elements indicated above. In addition, you need to modify design processes to systematically develop the necessary information and then design appropriate solutions to be developed. It takes time to change the way you do things, but start with the smallest efforts that have the largest impact, focusing on a resonant hook and meaningful practice.

What we’re really seeing, above, is an integration of learning science with engagement. They have to complement each other, because they can also be in conflict; e.g. gratuitous details distracting from the focus and overwhelming available resources, as we see from Sweller’s Cognitive Load Theory. Comprehending and applying engagement provides the necessary complement to learning science to create learning that is truly transformational. Which is where we can, and should, be.


Clark Quinn is Executive Director and Quinnovation

Related content:

References

Brown, P.C., Roediger III, H.L., & McDaniel, M.A. (2014). Make It Stick: The Science of Successful Learning. Boston: Harvard University Press.

Clark, R.C. & Mayer, R.E. (2011). e-Learning and the Science of Instruction (3rd Edition).  San Francisco: Pfeiffer.

Csíkszentmihályi, M. (1990). Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. New York, NY: Harper & Row.

Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “What” and “Why” of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11 (4).

Dirksen, J. (2015). Design for How People Learn (2nd Edition). New Riders Press: Berkeley, CA.

Dirksen, J. (2023). Talk to the Elephant: Design Learning for Behavior Change. New Riders Press: Berkeley, CA.

Ericsson, A. & Pool, R. (2016). Peak: Secrets From the New Science of Expertise. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

Keller, J. M. (2010). Motivational Design for Learning and Performance: The ARCS model approach. New York: Springer.

Lepper, M.R., & Cordova, D. I. (1992).  A Desire to Be Taught: Instructional Consequences of Intrinsic Motivation.  Motivation & Emotion, 16, 3, 187-208.

Neelen, M. & Kirschner, P. K. (2020). Evidence-Informed Learning Design. London: Kogan-Page.

Pine, B.J. & Gilmore, J H. (1999).The Experience Economy: Work Is Theatre & Every Business a Stage. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

Quinn, C. (2021). Learning Science for Instructional Designers: From Cognition to Application. Alexandria, VA: ATD Press.

Quinn, C. (2022). Make It Meaningful: Taking Learning Design from Instructional to Transformational. Boston: LDA Press.

Reigeluth, C. & Stein, F. (1983). The elaboration theory of instruction. In C. Reigeluth (ed.), Instructional Design Theories and Models. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.

Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science. 12 (2): 257–285.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978).  Mind in Society.  Edited by M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, and E. Souberman.  Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Tue, 02 Jan 2024 16:30:00 -0600 en-GB text/html https://www.trainingjournal.com/2024/content-type/features/from-hook-to-landing-mastering-learning-experience-design-for-lasting-impact/
Learning to Teach in a New Era
  • Entering the teaching profession in the twenty-first century comes with many challenges and even more opportunities to meet the learning needs of Australian students. Learning to Teach in a New Era provides a fundamental introduction to educational practice for early childhood, primary and secondary preservice teachers. Closely aligned with the Australian Curriculum and the Australian Professional Standards for Teachers, this text builds on foundational knowledge and provides guidance on professional development throughout your career in education. Organised in three sections – professional knowledge, professional practice and professional engagement – and thoroughly updated, this text introduces educational policy and the legal dimensions of education; encourages the development of practical skills in pedagogy, planning, assessment, digital technologies and classroom management; and supports effective communication and ethical practice. This edition features a new chapter exploring Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander ways of knowing, being and doing, enabling teachers to create respectful and culturally responsive classrooms.

    • Links closely to the Australian Professional Standards for Teachers (APST) and the Australian Curriculum to prepare preservice teachers for the frameworks that will shape their teaching careers
    • Thoroughly updated, this edition features a new chapter exploring Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander ways of knowing, being and doing, enabling teachers to create respectful and culturally responsive classrooms
    • Access to the complementary interactive ebook is provided inside the front cover of the printed book, unlocking a generous pool of self-assessment tools such as questions and video resources
    Read more

    Customer reviews

    Not yet reviewed

    Be the first to review

    Review was not posted due to profanity

    ×

    Product details

    • Edition: 2nd Edition
    • Date Published: February 2022
    • format: Print/online bundle
    • isbn: 9781108985789
    • length: 440 pages
    • dimensions: 254 x 204 x 17 mm
    • weight: 0.94kg
    • availability: In stock
  • Table of Contents

    Part I. Introduction:
    1. Teaching in the twenty-first century Jeanne Allen and Simone White
    Part II. Professional Knowledge:
    2. Understanding the education landscape: policy, practice and context Simone White
    3. Effective pedagogy for student learning Anne Coffey
    4. Teaching with digital technologies Amber McLeod, Kelly Carabott and Catherine Lang
    Part III. Professional Practice:
    5. Aligning curriculum, pedagogy, assessment and reporting Madonna Stinson and Suzanne Henden
    6. Planning for teaching Linley Cornish, Michelle Bannister-Tyrrell, Jennifer Charteris, Kathy Jenkins and Marguerite Jones
    7. Student diversity, education and social justice Leonie Rowan
    8. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander education Alison Quin and Francis Bobongie-Harris
    9. Understanding classroom management Jeanne Allen and Michelle Ronksley-Pavia
    10. Promoting positive teaching and learning environments Andrea Reupert and Stuart Woodcock
    Part IV. Professional Engagement:
    11. Communication skills with students, staff and parents/caregivers Wendy Goff
    12. Becoming a teaching professional: scoping the ethical and legal dimensions Elaine Sharplin and Deborah Wake.

  • Editors

    Jeanne Allen, Griffith University, Queensland
    Jeanne Allen is Associate Professor and Higher Degree Research Coordinator in the School of Education and Professional Studies at Griffith University. Her research expertise is in teacher education, standardised educational contexts, teacher identity, and student engagement and retention. Jeanne was an invited contributor to the prestigious Sage Handbook of Research on Teacher Education and she was named national leading researcher in the field of Teaching and Teacher Education by Australia's League of Scholars in 20188. Her most accurate books are Young Adolescent Engagement in Learning: Supporting Students through Structure and Community (2019) and Teachers as Professional Learners: Contextualising Identity across Policy and Practice (2021). She is also immediate past co-editor of the Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education.

    Simone White, Queensland University of Technology
    Simone White is Professor of Education in the Faculty of Creative Industries, Education and Social Justice at the Queensland University of Technology. She previously held the Chair of Teacher Education at Monash University and led the Academic Community for the Teacher Education, Arts, Language and Professional Learning Group. She is a Past President of the Australian Teacher Education Association (ATEA). Simone recently led an OLT-funded project titled 'Engaging and partnering with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander parents and community to Strengthen student outcomes'. Simone sits on the Editorial Board of the Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education.

    Contributors

    Jeanne Allen, Simone White, Anne Coffey, Catherine Lang, Kelly Carabott, Amber McLeod, Madonna Stinson, Suzanne Henden, Linley Cornish, Michelle Bannister-Tyrrell, Jennifer Charteris, Kathy Jenkins, Marguerite Jones, Leonie Rowan, Simone White, Francis Bobogonie, Alison Quin, Michelle Ronksley-Pavia, Andrea Reupert, Stuart Woodcock, Wendy Goff, Elaine Sharplin, Deborah Wake

  • Tue, 19 Dec 2023 19:12:00 -0600 en text/html https://www.cambridge.org/us/universitypress/subjects/education/education-history-theory/learning-teach-new-era-2nd-edition?format=DO&isbn=9781108985789
    Education Students Attend Annual Conference

    In November 2019, five Saint Louis University School of Education students attended the Annual Conference of the National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC) in Nashville, TN, along with SLU early childhood and early childhood special education faculty.

    The students — Gwen Cataldo, Madeline Cook, Maya Gross, Dana Meinecke, and Katie Schuller — are all earning their B.A. with either an early childhood or early childhood/early childhood special education concentration. The NAEYC is a nonprofit organization that supports early childhood educators, program administrators, students, and researchers.

    Cook, Schuller, and Cataldo at the NAEYC conference expo hall, holding shirts that say, "Early Childhood Educators Rock!" 

    The NAEYC conference is the largest early childhood education conference in the world, offering hundreds of presentations and exhibits for attendees. The students each volunteered at the conference and attended sessions featuring the latest information and research in early childhood education. They had the opportunity to select a session track: Teaching with Purpose, Leading with Excellence, Preparing and Engaging Professional Learners, Creating Conditions for Success, or specialized tracks presented in Mandarin or Spanish.

    The students were exposed to networking opportunities and able to connect with both their peers and some of the most prominent leaders in the field. Cataldo explained why she appreciated the opportunity to attend the annual NAEYC conference, “I found that much of what I am learning here in the early childhood program at Saint Louis University is preparing me to connect and work with other early childhood educators across the country. While I learned a lot at the conference, I think that my biggest takeaway is that SLU's education program is filled with fantastic faculty and staff who are teaching us things that many educators travel hundreds of miles to learn.”

    For information on the early childhood and early childhood special education concentrations through the Saint Louis University School of Education, visit the School of Education website. 

    Sun, 02 Feb 2020 21:32:00 -0600 en text/html https://www.slu.edu/education/news/2020/naeyc-conference.php




    LCP-001 test Questions | LCP-001 benefits | LCP-001 learning | LCP-001 PDF Download | LCP-001 benefits | LCP-001 health | LCP-001 test | LCP-001 basics | LCP-001 test | LCP-001 test |


    Killexams test Simulator
    Killexams Questions and Answers
    Killexams Exams List
    Search Exams
    LCP-001 exam dump and training guide direct download
    Training Exams List