Just download free 156-315.81 Exam Braindumps with Cheatsheet
Is it safe to say that you are searching for Checkpoint 156-315.81 Exam Questions with genuine inquiries for the Check Point Certified Security Expert R81 Exam?. We give as of late refreshed and legitimate 156-315.81 Exam Braindumps. We have gotten a major assortment of legitimate and state-of-the-art 156-315.81 Cheatsheet inquiries from genuine 156-315.81 tests. You should simply retain and step through the exam.
156-315.81 Check Point Certified Security Expert R81 answers | http://babelouedstory.com/
156-315.81 Check Point Certified Security Expert R81
Exam Specification: 156-315.81 Check Point Certified Security Expert R81
Exam Name: 156-315.81 Check Point Certified Security Expert R81
Exam Code: 156-315.81
Exam Duration: 90 minutes
Passing Score: 70%
Exam Format: Multiple-choice
Exam Delivery: Proctored online or at a testing center
Course Outline:
1. Introduction to Check Point Security Expert R81
- Overview of the Check Point Security Expert certification
- Understanding the role of a Check Point Certified Security Expert
- Exploring the features and capabilities of Check Point R81
2. Advanced Firewall Configuration and Management
- Configuring advanced firewall policies and rules
- Implementing advanced network address translation (NAT) techniques
- Utilizing advanced security features such as IPS and Application Control
3. Virtual Private Network (VPN) Deployment and Troubleshooting
- Configuring site-to-site and remote access VPNs
- Troubleshooting VPN connectivity and encryption issues
- Implementing VPN high availability and load balancing
4. Security Gateway Performance Optimization
- Analyzing and optimizing Security Gateway performance
- Utilizing performance monitoring and debugging tools
- Implementing acceleration and caching techniques
5. Advanced Threat Prevention and Security Management
- Deploying and managing advanced threat prevention technologies
- Configuring security policies for threat prevention
- Utilizing Security Management features for centralized control
6. Multi-Domain Security Management
- Implementing and managing Multi-Domain Security Management
- Configuring domain-level security policies and objects
- Utilizing SmartProvisioning for managing multiple gateways
Exam Objectives:
1. Understand the advanced firewall configuration and management in Check Point R81.
2. Demonstrate proficiency in deploying and troubleshooting VPNs.
3. Optimize Security Gateway performance in Check Point R81.
4. Deploy and manage advanced threat prevention technologies.
5. Configure and manage Multi-Domain Security Management in Check Point R81.
Exam Syllabus:
Section 1: Introduction to Check Point Security Expert R81 (10%)
- Check Point Security Expert certification overview
- Role and responsibilities of a Check Point Certified Security Expert
- Features and capabilities of Check Point R81
Section 2: Advanced Firewall Configuration and Management (25%)
- Advanced firewall policies and rules configuration
- Advanced network address translation (NAT) techniques
- Implementation of IPS and Application Control
Section 3: Virtual Private Network (VPN) Deployment and Troubleshooting (20%)
- Site-to-site and remote access VPN configuration
- Troubleshooting VPN connectivity and encryption issues
- VPN high availability and load balancing
Section 4: Security Gateway Performance Optimization (20%)
- Performance analysis and optimization techniques
- Performance monitoring and debugging tools
- Acceleration and caching implementation
Section 5: Advanced Threat Prevention and Security Management (20%)
- Deployment and management of advanced threat prevention technologies
- Security policy configuration for threat prevention
- Utilization of Security Management features for centralized control
Section 6: Multi-Domain Security Management (5%)
- Implementation and management of Multi-Domain Security Management
- Configuration of domain-level security policies and objects
- Utilization of SmartProvisioning for managing multiple gateways
Check Point Certified Security Expert R81 Checkpoint Certified answers
killexams.com high quality 156-315.81 VCE test simulator is extremely encouraging for our clients for the test prep. 156-315.81 Real Questions, points and definitions are featured in brain dumps pdf. Social occasion the information in one place is a genuine help and causes you get ready for the IT certification test inside a brief timeframe traverse. The 156-315.81 test offers key focuses. The killexams.com pass4sure 156-315.81 dumps retains the essential questions, brain dumps or ideas of the 156-315.81 exam.
Avaya
156-315.81
Check Point Certified Security Expert R81
https://killexams.com/pass4sure/exam-detail/156-315.81 Question: 93
R81.10 management server can manage gateways with which versions installed?
A. Versions R77 and higher
B. Versions R76 and higher
C. Versions R75.20 and higher
D. Versions R75 and higher Answer: C Question: 94
Which command can you use to enable or disable multi-queue per interface?
A. cpmq set
B. Cpmqueue set
C. Cpmq config
D. St cpmq enable Answer: A Question: 95
How can SmartView application accessed?
A. http:///smartview
B. http://:4434/smartview/
C. https:///smartview/
D. https://:4434/smartview/ Answer: C Question: 96
fwssd is a child process of which of the following Check Point daemons?
A. fwd
B. cpwd
C. fwm
D. cpd Answer: A Question: 97
What Factor preclude Secure XL Templating?
A. Source Port Ranges/Encrypted Connections
B. IPS
C. ClusterXL in load sharing Mode
D. CoreXL Answer: A Question: 98
Which command is used to set the CCP protocol to Multicast?
A. cphaprob set_ccp multicast
B. cphaconf set_ccp multicast
C. cphaconf set_ccp no_broadcast
D. cphaprob set_ccp no_broadcast Answer: B Question: 99
SSL Network Extender (SNX) is a thin SSL VPN on-demand client that is installed on the remote user’s machine via
the web browser.
What are the two modes of SNX?
A. Application and Client Service
B. Network and Application
C. Network and Layers
D. Virtual Adapter and Mobile App Answer: B Question: 100
If you needed the Multicast MAC address of a cluster, what command would you run?
A. cphaprob Ca if
B. cphaconf ccp multicast
C. cphaconf debug data
D. cphaprob igmp Answer: D Question: 101
What is true about VRRP implementations?
A. VRRP membership is enabled in cpconfig
B. VRRP can be used together with ClusterXL, but with degraded performance
C. You cannot have a standalone deployment
D. You cannot have different VRIDs in the same physical network Answer: C Question: 102
When doing a Stand-Alone Installation, you would install the Security Management Server with which other Check
Point architecture component?
A. None, Security Management Server would be installed by itself.
B. SmartConsole
C. SecureClient
D. Security Gateway
E. SmartEvent Answer: D Question: 103
In a Client to Server scenario, which inspection point is the first point immediately following the tables and rule base
check of a packet coming from outside of the network?
A. Big l
B. Little o
C. Little i
D. Big O Answer: A Question: 104
What is the difference between an event and a log?
A. Events are generated at gateway according to Event Policy
B. A log entry becomes an event when it matches any rule defined in Event Policy
C. Events are collected with SmartWorkflow form Trouble Ticket systems
D. Log and Events are synonyms Answer: B
For More exams visit https://killexams.com/vendors-exam-list
Checkpoint Certified answers - BingNews
https://killexams.com/pass4sure/exam-detail/156-315.81
Search resultsCheckpoint Certified answers - BingNews
https://killexams.com/pass4sure/exam-detail/156-315.81
https://killexams.com/exam_list/CheckpointPay attention! Our attention spans are shrinkingPay attention! Our attention spans are shrinking - CBS News
Are attention spans getting shorter? Are you getting more distracted by multitasking on top of multitasking? Correspondent David Pogue tries to get answers from researcher Gloria Mark, author of "Attention Span," at the same time he talks with Cornell psychology professor James Cutting AND with counselor Lauren Barnett AND her daughters about how distractive technologies are affecting our behavior, productivity and stress levels.
Be the first to know
Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.
In latest years, the number and scope of professional designations available have grown, and many financial advisors are now unsure of which credential will serve them most effectively. This is especially true for specialized designations for retirement planning and working with the specific financial needs of older adults. As the Bureau of Labor Statistics notes, the major driver of the growth in jobs for financial advisors is the aging population. The large baby boomer generation is on the way to retirement, and longer life spans are leading to prolonged retirements, adding to the demand for financial planning services aimed at older adults. Here, we take a closer look at some of the designations used and whether they are worth pursuing for those looking to offer financial advice on retirement planning, retirement income, longevity planning, and estate planning.
Key Takeaways
Many financial advisors are specializing in retirement planning and income.
As a result, these advisors have sought targeted training and education to validate their expertise and signal their skills to those who need it.
Several professional credentials and designations are now available for financial planning for older adults, with certified senior advisor (CSA) being the most recognized.
Chartered advisor for senior living (CASL) was a popular certification no longer available for new applicants (though existing license holders are still required to continue their education).
Some designations, like the certified senior specialist (CSS), face restrictions from state bodies and are not recognized as valid in some areas.
Another well-rounded certification option is the chartered senior financial planner (CSFP).
What Are Designations Focused on Older Adults?
Several designations have been created in the financial planning industry in latest years. Designations focused on the needs of older adults primarily involve financial strategies for individuals aged 50 and older.
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) do not officially recognize any professional titles such as “retirement advisor” that financial professionals use. Nevertheless, this financial planning consumer demographic has been increasingly targeted from almost every direction by the financial services industry, including banks, insurance companies, and independent financial and estate planners.
With potentially larger portfolio balances, given their longer investment timeline and a growing need for retirement and succession planning services, there are ample needs and opportunities for working with older clients.
The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) does not approve or endorse any professional designation. The designation's inclusion in its database doesn't mean that FINRA considers the designation acceptable for use by a registered representative.
4 Main Designations
Here are four main designations that financial professionals may use to signal expertise in the financial planning needs of older adults:
Certified Senior Advisor
Offered and recognized by the Society of Certified Senior Advisors (SCSA), a CSA is the best-known advisory certification on this list. Candidates need to pass a certification examination on the social, medical, cultural, financial, and legal aspects of aging to become a license holder.
There is no prescribed training or education program, but the SCSA offers resources like textbooks and live course training. Preparation for the test usually takes 50–60 hours. Candidates must also complete 30 hours of continuing education and pass a criminal background check every three years to maintain their certification.
CSAs are typically professionals in different fields who work exclusively or frequently with the aging and want to supplement their professional knowledge with the designation. Many advisors who earn this designation work primarily with fixed or indexed annuities. However, some nonfinancial professionals, including estate planning attorneys, healthcare professionals, and administrators, carry this designation. CSAs must inform consumers that the designation alone does not imply financial, health, or social expertise.Â
Chartered Advisor in Senior Living (CASL)
Offered by The American College, CASL applicants need to have worked with older adults for a minimum of three years before they can take the required examination. Applicants must also adhere to The American College's code of ethics.
A CASL advisor is tested on retirement distributions from pensions and Social Security, planning for health and long-term care needs, and effective estate planning strategies. The CASL designation is no longer offered to new students. However, existing certificate holders are required to participate in the Professional Recertification Program to keep their credentials.
Certified Senior Specialist (CSS)
CSS requires more course work than the others in retirement planning, estate tax planning, annuities, Social Security, and Medicare. The test covers long-term care and issues related to the care of adults 80 and over, the demographics of the population of older adults, charitable estate planning techniques, and reverse mortgages.
The CSS license is issued by Certified for Senior Studies, although not all jurisdictions recognize the designation. For example, California treats this license differently than the CSA since the designation can't be used by agents or brokers to sell insurance to adults 65 and over. For this reason, the CSS license holds much less value than some of the other licenses.
Chartered Senior Financial Planner (CSFP)
Issued by the Association of Chartered Senior Financial Planners, the CSFP designation trains recipients in advanced retirement and estate planning strategies. To take the exam, trainees must have two years of insurance experience, two years of securities experience, or be a licensed attorney or CPA. Three-day training sessions are available before the exam, and 16 hours of continuing education are required every two years.
Like other exams, the CSFP designation prescribes a code of ethics and demonstrates a holder's proficiency in preretirement, post-retirement, and asset protection strategies.
Broad Based Designations That Serve Seniors
While designations for expertise in the financial needs of older adults may differ substantially in the academic training, none of them can compare to the curricula for established and respected designations such as Chartered Financial Planner (CFP), Chartered Life Underwriter, or Chartered Financial Consultant.
If you wish to position yourself as an expert in financial planning for anyone, including older adults, you should first consider earning one of the more traditional, comprehensive designations. Afterward, you could earn one of the designations focusing on older adults. At that point, your competence in the needs of this demographic would mean a great deal more as you've honed in on a specific Topic while having a broad background in financial planning. You would also be subject to a code of ethics that can be enforced.
Pending Consequences
Given they often have access to savings that are meant to take them through their retirement years, older adults are frequently targeted by scam artists and charlatans. The National Council on Aging (NCOA) reports that in 2022, there were 88,262 complaints of fraud, resulting in $3.1 billion in losses from people age 60 and over. This may vastly underrate the problem, given that such frauds often go unreported, according to the NCOA. The most common scams involve impersonating government officials, supposed sweepstakes winnings, and robocalls.
As a result, state and federal regulators have taken notice of inadequate training and the business approach many certificate holders take to the financial matters of older adults. One of the main limits regulators face when dealing with this problem is that no overarching agency monitors the financial designation community like there is for insurance or securities licensing. Therefore, any “rogue” credential must be dealt with state-by-state.
What Is the Best License Designation for Working With Older Adults?
The Certified Senior Advisor (CSA) designation is the most recognizable professional license. Though it still falls well short of the breadth and depth of wide-scale professional licenses, it remains a strong option for those looking for specific certification in the financial matters of older adults.
Is It Worth Getting a Designation for Working With Older Adults?
There are mixed opinions on the value of these license designations. Some argue any sort of formal training and test provides value and boosts your credibility as a financial planner. Others point out the gap in education between these license designations and broader financial planner certifications. As long as your clients understand the limits of what the designation means, there is some value in pursuing them.
Are All Designations for Working With Older Adults Recognized?
No, such license designations are often recognized on a state-by-state basis. Each state will have its own reporting requirements, and many limit the recognition of some designations. When a designation is limited in a state, the financial advisor can't use that title while pursuing sales of insurance or securities. To check whether your license is recognized in a specific state, check with that state's Department of Insurance.
The Bottom Line
While the differences between designations such as the CFP and CSA may be apparent to those in the business, most people looking for financial advice may have difficulty comprehending the gap in training between the two. Although it would be unfair to label every financial professional who holds a designation for advising older adults as dishonest, the increasing pressure from state regulators is making the future of these designations uncertain.
Advisors considering whether to pursue a designation for working with older adults may want to check with their state's insurance commissioner and securities bureau before enrolling in a program. While bogus designations can fool prospects and clients at least temporarily, regulators are certain to rectify the situation eventually.
Thu, 14 Dec 2023 08:34:00 -0600entext/htmlhttps://www.investopedia.com/financial-advisor/close-look-at-certified-senior-designations/Michigan Test for Teacher Certification
MTTC tests are meant to ensure that each certified teacher has the necessary skills and subject area knowledge to serve in Michigan's schools. These tests are designed and implemented by the Michigan Department of Education.
Save all official MTTC score reports in a safe place because you may need them for employment or teacher certification in other states. If you need new score reports, additional copies may be ordered using these instructions.
In order to be certified, students must pass the MTTC subject area tests that correspond to the major and minor field(s) of study. These tests should not be taken until the final year of the program, but it is highly recommended that students pass their MTTC subject area test(s) before student teaching.
Subject area test scores are valid for five years from the date of testing (students need to be recommended for certification within those five years).
During the registration process, be sure to identify yourself as a Calvin student and also request that your scores be sent to Calvin.
Be careful to enter an accurate social security number. It is a huge inconvenience if you enter an incorrect number. Canadians, please register using your U.S. social security number, not your Canadian social insurance number.
When asked if you are completing an “alternative route” to teacher certification, answer “No” (Calvin’s program is a traditional route).
Candidates who do not speak English as a primary language may request additional time for any MTTC test except world language subject tests.
Be sure to review the appropriate study guides. Depending on your subject area, you may find helpful practice problems at education.com or 240Tutoring. Curriculum Collection middle or high school textbooks may be used to review content.
Tests are no longer offered on campus. All MTTC tests are now computer-based only. Exam Center locations are available in cities worldwide.Â
Elementary Education Students
Students seeking elementary certification must also take the Elementary Education MTTC test #103. Do not take the new Lower or Upper Elementary tests 117-124. When registering for the Elementary Education test, report elementary education as a "major." Take the time to review the online study guide and test objectives. Spend extra time studying for these subareas, which have lower pass rates:
Social Studies
Visual and Performing Arts
Health and Physical Education
Special Education Program Students
Candidates interested in teaching grades 9–12 special education in a Michigan public school may need to take additional MTTC tests later in consultation with the hiring school (mathematics, integrated science, and/or language arts).
If you have questions, contact Calvin's certification and assessment coordinator at (616) 526-6208 or certification@calvin.edu.
Risk Learning Certified Faculty is a global collective of brilliant, experienced professionals with a passion for helping others understand, manage and mitigate risk exposure for individuals and organisations
See why Risk Learning is the number one choice for professionals who work in risk management, derivatives and complex financial markets.
“I would definitely select Risk Training again predicated on the needs of my learners; but also based on this experience with bringing this programme in house. Overall, this was a very positive learning experience and I highly anticipate getting requests for related training activities in the near future”.
Learning Manager – Bermuda
“The tutor was a phenomenal choice for leading the training and the content forced us to think about strategy, etc. instead of just being report producers. This is good to hear and to consider how to think about the current market”.
Chief Risk Officer – USA
“This has been a really rich set of material that you’ve shared with us and talked us through. I think it has served exactly the purpose that I intended which is let’s get a lay of the land, lets know what’s been done, and what kind of issues we need to confront as we proceed on our own journey.”.
Chief Risk Officer – USA
Anna Holten Møller
Senior Risk Analyst
Nykredit
Jeremy Holmes
Director, advisory & oversight, GRM operational risk, corporate functions
RBC
Dr. Ariane Chapelle
Managing partner
Chapelle | Risk Management Advisory
Rohan Kataria
Head of execution for WMR traded risk stress testing
HSBC
Rebecca Self
Director of sustainable finance (former CFO, sustainable finance, HSBC)
South Pole
Krishna Nijanand
Senior manager of structural interest rate risk
Scotiabank
Maria Kostova
Lead quantitative specialist
CRISIL Limited
Saeed Amen
Founder and visiting lecturer
Queen Mary University of London
Radka Margitova
Director, financial services risk consulting, credit risk and ESG risk
PwC
Armel R. Kouassi
Senior Vice-President
Northern Trust Corporation
Dr. Matteo Formenti
Vice-president
UniCredit
Christian Rasmussen
Head of group treasury
UBS
Dr. Chris Kenyon
Head of XVA quant modelling, and AI innovation lead
MUFG Securities EMEA plc
Daniel Wynne
Libor Transition SME
National Australia Bank
Peter Plochan
EMEA principal risk specialist
SAS
You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.
Wed, 06 Jul 2022 09:10:00 -0500entext/htmlhttps://www.risk.net/static/risk-learning-risk-certified-facultyCPSC Proposes Significant Changes to Rule Governing Certificates of Compliance
The Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC or Agency) recently published a Supplemental Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (SNPR) (88 Fed. Reg. 85760 (December 8, 2023)) to revise the existing rule on Certificates of Compliance (CoC or certificates), 16 CFR § 1110 (Rule 1110). The last time CPSC proposed changes to Rule 1110 was in 2013, when the Agency received more than 500 comments responding to its Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (2013 NPR), many voicing specific legal and other objections to the proposed changes. A decade later, CPSC is reviving the CoC rulemaking process. This SNPR proposes a number of significant changes to Rule 1110, including the addition of an electronic filing (eFiling) requirement for all imported CPSC-regulated products or substances, an expanded definition of “importer” to include the importer of record and certain other entities, and new CoC content and recordkeeping requirements.
Given the staggering number of imported consumer products and the expansive scope of proposed changes, the SNPR warrants close attention by anyone making CPSC-regulated products abroad for distribution in the United States or direct shipments to U.S. consumers. Comments are due February 6, 2024.Â
Key Proposed Changes
Mandatory eFiling for Imported Goods. Under the existing Rule 1110, importers must ensure that a CoC “accompany” a regulated product or product shipment, meaning that the certificates must be available to the CPSC at the time imported products are available for inspection. Likewise, domestic manufacturers must make certificates available to the CPSC immediately “upon request” before the product is introduced into commerce. In practice, many importers and manufacturers email certificates in PDF format when requested. This will no longer be permitted. CPSC proposes to change this long-established practice to a requirement that all certificates covering imported consumer products be eFiled with CBP. Specifically, the SNPR will require importers to enter required certificate data elements with ACE at the time the entry is filed or when the entry and entry summary are filed, if filed together. This requirement would apply to all imported products regulated by CPSC. As proposed, this includes de minimis shipments and products imported from foreign trade zone (FTZ). The requirement that certificates be made available for inspection to CPSC or CBP “upon request” remains (with a proposed clarification that “immediately” means within 24 hours), but this obligation is not a substitute for eFiling the CoC.
Imported Products Shipped Directly to Consumers. The 2013 NPR had proposed a separate “accompany” requirement for imported finished products that are delivered directly to U.S. consumers. The SNPR nixes that proposal and instead states that those certificates will be collected electronically. For finished products that are imported by mail, the finished product certifier will have to enter the certificate data elements into CPSC’s Product Registry prior to the product arriving in the U.S.
Entities Responsible for Certifying Imported Products. The SNPR broadens the definition of “importer” to include not only any entity that the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) allows to be an importer of record (IOR), as proposed in the 2013 NPR, but other entities as well, including private labelers, consignees, owners, purchasers, and others with “financial interest in the product.” A customs broker can also be an importer “when appropriately designated by the owner, purchaser, or consignee of the product or substance.” The SNPR clarifies that for purposes of testing and certification, “CPSC will not typically consider a consumer purchasing or receiving products for personal use or enjoyment to be an importer.”
Entities Responsible for Certifying Domestic Products. The SNPR maintains the 2013 NPR proposal that, unless otherwise required in a specific rule, the manufacturer must issue the certificate except for consumer products or substances that are privately labeled. Because the manufacturer’s name does not appear on privately labeled products, CPSC reasoned that placing the certification obligation on the private labeler “is both pragmatic and appropriate.” Nevertheless, the SNPR gives private labelers the option to rely on a manufacturer’s testing or certification.
Optional Electronically Available Certificates. The SNPR states that the requirements that a CoC be “furnished” to each distributor or retailer of the finished product and be “available for inspection immediately” upon request by CPSC and CBP may be satisfied with an “electronic certificate.” Such an electronic certificate must be “identified prominently on the finished product, shipping carton, or invoice by a unique identifier [that] can be accessed via a World Wide Web uniform resource locator (URL) or other electronic means, provided that the certificate, the URL or other electronic means, and the unique identifier are accessible … on or before the date the finished product is distributed in commerce.”
Replacement Parts Defined. In response to multiple comments to the 2013 NPR expressing confusion about “replacement parts” and “component parts,” the SNPR defines the terms and clarifies certificate of compliance requirements. Certificates are required for regulated “replacement parts” that are “imported for consumption or warehousing, or are distributed in commerce, and that are packaged, sold, or held for sale to, or use by, consumers.” Such replacement parts are considered “finished products” and included in the proposed finished product definition. For example, a handlebar stem for a bicycle sold to consumers as a replacement part must be tested and requires a certificate. Likewise, parts of toys, such as doll accessories, sold to consumers as separate finished products, must be separately tested and certified. However, not all replacement parts are finished products requiring testing and certification. For example, doll accessories that are imported for manufacturing purposes or intended to be combined with a doll for sale are not deemed “finished products” and do not require a separate certificate apart from the certificate for the finished doll.
Component Parts Defined. “Component parts” are defined as “intended to be used in the manufacture or assembly of a finished product” and “not intended for sale to, or use by, consumers as a finished product.” Component part certificates are voluntary and are not required to accompany an imported component part, be furnished to retailers and distributors, or eFiled.
One Product per CoC. The SNPR maintains the 2013 NPR proposal that each CoC describe a single product. According to CPSC, “[o]ne product per certificate allows the RAM [CPSC’s Risk Assessment Methodology] to conduct risk analysis on unique products in a shipment, which allows better targeting of potentially violative products and avoids delaying delivery of products in a shipment that do not warrant examination.”
CoC Content. Currently, Rule 1110 requires seven data elements on all certificates: (1) information identifying the product; (2) list of all applicable rules which the product meets; (3) name, mailing address, and telephone number of importer or domestic manufacturer; (4) name, email, mailing address, and telephone number of individual maintaining test results; (5) date and place of manufacture; (6) date and place of product testing; and (7) name, mailing address, and telephone number of third party lab for any required testing. The SNPR proposes additional required details for some of the seven data elements, including, for example:
Data element (1) must include at least one unique product identifier from a list of seven options (GTIN, model number, registered number, serial number, SKU, UPC, or alternate identifier), as well as a “sufficient description to match the finished product to the certificate”;
The SNPR adds an email address requirement to data element (3), and specifies that mailing address means street address, city, state or province, country or administrative region, and if no street address is available, requires a GPS coordinate or “a location identification typical of the country of origin”;
Data element (5) as proposed must include not just date and place of manufacture, but also the manufacturer’s name, street address, city, state or province, country or admin region, email address, and telephone number where finished products are manufactured, produced, or assembled; and
Data element (6) must include the most latest date of testing, together with expanded contact information for each testing body, including full mailing address, email, and telephone number (similar to contact information for importer/manufacturer and manufacturing facilities).
New Attestation of Compliance Requirement. In addition to the seven existing data elements, CPSC has proposed a new requirement: each CoC must also include an attestation of compliance. The SNPR provides specific language for the attestation, which includes an express acknowledgement that “it is a United States federal crime to knowingly and willfully make any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement, representation, or omission on this certificate.”
New Recordkeeping Requirement. The current rule does not include specific recordkeeping requirements. The SNPR proposes an effective five-year record retention period for both children’s product certificates and general certificates of conformity. According to the 2013 NPR, which also included this proposal, a five-year retention period “may, for example, aid both the certifier and the Commission in the event of an investigation or product recall.”
Effective Date
The SNPR proposes an effective date that is 120 days after publication of the final rule in the Federal Register. According to CPSC, importers will require this time to update their systems and software in order to use CPSC’s Product Registry, and CPSC asserts that this relatively short timeframe is consistent with the experience of eFiling Beta Pilot participants who initially tested the eFiling system.
Conclusion
Interested parties may submit comments on all aspects of the SNPR, including, for example, the expanded definition of “importer,” issues presented by requiring eFiling of certificates with CPB at the time of entry, concerns with the additional detail required on the certificates (including the potential disclosure of proprietary information), financial, technical and other burdens of compliance should the proposed new requirements be adopted, and the feasibility of the proposed 120-day effective date. The proposed rule will have a significant impact across the entire consumer product spectrum, and those interested in commenting should consider both any benefits and efficiencies, as well as costs and other impacts.Â
Wed, 03 Jan 2024 10:00:00 -0600entext/htmlhttps://www.natlawreview.com/article/cpsc-proposes-significant-changes-rule-governing-certificates-complianceExploding toilet at Dunkin’ in Florida left a customer injured and filthy, lawsuit claimsNo result found, try new keyword!A customer has filed a negligence lawsuit against Dunkin’, claiming he was injured by an exploding toilet at one of the coffee chain’s locations in central Florida.Thu, 04 Jan 2024 05:33:49 -0600en-ustext/htmlhttps://www.msn.com/Trump asks US Supreme Court to review Colorado ruling barring him from the ballot over Jan. 6 attackNo result found, try new keyword!Former President Donald Trump asked the U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday to overturn a ruling barring him from the Colorado ballot, setting up a high-stakes showdown over a constitutional provision ...Wed, 03 Jan 2024 08:15:00 -0600en-ustext/htmlhttps://www.msn.com/
