Were you unable to attend Transform 2022? Check out all of the summit sessions in our on-demand library now! Watch here.
Designing, testing and provisioning updates to data digital networks depends on numerous manual and error-prone processes. Digital twins are starting to play a crucial role in automating more of this process to help bring digital transformation to network infrastructure. These efforts are already driving automation for campus networks, wide area networks (WANs) and commercial wireless networks.
The digital transformation of the network infrastructure will take place over an extended period of time. In this two-part series, we’ll be exploring how digital twins are driving network transformation. Today, we’ll look at the current state of networking and how digital twins are helping to automate the process, as well as the shortcomings that are currently being seen with the technology.
In part 2, we’ll look at the future state of digital twins and how the technology can be used when fully developed and implemented.
At its heart, a digital twin is a model of any entity kept current by constant telemetry updates. In practice, multiple overlapping digital twins are often used across various aspects of the design, construction and operation of networks, their components, and the business services that run on them.
Peyman Kazemian, cofounder of Forward Networks, argues that the original Traceroute program written by Van Jacobson in 1987 is the oldest and most used tool to understand the network. Although it neither models nor simulates the networks, it does help to understand the behavior of the network by sending a representative packet through the network and observing the path it takes.
Later, other network simulation tools were developed, such as OPNET (1986), NetSim (2005), and GNS3 (2008), that can simulate a network by running the same code as the genuine network devices.
“These kinds of solutions are useful in operating networks because they give you a lab environment to try out new ideas and changes to your network,” Kazemian said.
Teresa Tung, cloud first chief technologist at Accenture, said that the open systems interconnection (OSI) conceptual model provides the foundation for describing networking capabilities along with separation of concerns.
This approach can help to focus on different layers of simulation and modeling. For example, a use case may focus on RF models at the physical layer, through to the packet and event-level within the network layer, the quality of service (QoS) and mean opinion score (MoS) measures in the presentation and application layers.
Today, network digital twins typically only help model and automate pockets of a network isolated by function, vendors or types of users.
The most common use case for digital twins is testing and optimizing network equipment configurations. However, because there are differences in how equipment vendors implement networking standards, this can lead to subtle variances in routing behavior, said Ernest Lefner, chief product officer at Gluware.
Lefner said the challenge for everyone attempting to build a digital twin is that they must have detailed knowledge of every vendor, feature, and configuration and customization in their network. This can vary by device, hardware type, or software release version.
Some network equipment providers, like Extreme Networks, let network engineers build a network that automatically synchronizes the configuration and state of that provider’s specific equipment.
Today, Extreme’s product supports only the capability to streamline staging, validation and deployment of Extreme switches and access points. The digital twin feature doesn’t currently support the SD-WAN customer on-premises equipment or routers. In the future, Extreme plans to add support for testing configurations, OS upgrades and troubleshooting problems.
Other network vendor offerings like Cisco DNA, Juniper Networks Mist and HPE Aruba Netconductor make it easier to capture network configurations and evaluate the impact of changes, but only for their own equipment.
“They are allowing you to stand up or test your configuration, but without specifically replicating the entire environment,” said Mike Toussaint, senior director analyst at Gartner.
You can test a specific configuration, and artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) will allow you to understand if a configuration is optimal, suboptimal or broken. But they have not automated the creation and calibration of a digital twin environment to the same degree as Extreme.
Until digital twins are widely adopted, most network engineers use virtual labs like GNS3 to model physical equipment and assess the functionality of configuration settings. This tool is widely used to train network engineers and to model network configurations.
Many larger enterprises physically test new equipment at the World Wide Technology Advanced Test Center. The firm has a partnership with most major equipment vendors to provide virtual access for assessing the performance of genuine physical hardware at their facility in St. Louis, Missouri.
Network equipment vendors are adding digital twin-like capabilities to their equipment. Juniper Networks’ recent Mist acquisition automatically captures and models different properties of the network that informs AI and machine optimizations. Similarly, Cisco’s network controller serves as an intermediary between business and network infrastructure.
Balaji Venkatraman, VP of product management, DNA, Cisco, said what distinguishes a digital twin from early modeling and simulation tools is that it provides a digital replica of the network and is updated by live telemetry data from the network.
“With the introduction of network controllers, we have a centralized view of at least the telemetry data to make digital twins a reality,” Venkatraman said.
However, network engineering practices will need to evolve their practices and cultures to take advantage of digital twins as part of their workflows. Gartner’s Toussaint told VentureBeat that most network engineering teams still create static network architecture diagrams in Visio.
And when it comes to rolling out new equipment, they either test it in a live environment with physical equipment or “do the cowboy thing and test it in production and hope it does not fail,” he said.
Even though network digital twins are starting to virtualize some of this testing workload, Toussaint said physically testing the performance of cutting-edge networking hardware that includes specialized ASICs, FPGAs, and TPUs chips will remain critical for some time.
Eventually, Toussaint expects networking teams to adopt the same devops practices that helped accelerate software development, testing and deployment processes. Digital twins will let teams create and manage development and test network sandboxes as code that mimics the behavior of the live deployment environment.
But the cultural shift won’t be easy for most organizations.
“Network teams tend to want to go in and make changes, and they have never really adopted the devops methodologies,” Toussaint said.
They tend to keep track of configuration settings on text files or maps drawn in Visio, which only provide a static representation of the live network.
“There have not really been the tools to do this in real time,” he said.
Getting a network map has been a very time-intensive manual process that network engineers hate, so they want to avoid doing it more than once. As a result, these maps seldom get updated.
Toussaint sees digital twins as an intermediate step as the industry uses more AI and ML to automate more aspects of network provisioning and management. Business managers are likely to be more enthused by more flexible and adaptable networks that keep pace with new business ideas than a dynamically updated map.
But in the interim, network digital twins will help teams visualize and build trust in their recommendations as these technologies improve.
“In another five or 10 years, when networks become fully automated, then digital twins become another tool, but not necessarily something that is a must-have,” Toussaint said.
Toussaint said these early network digital twins are suitable for vetting configurations, but have been limited in their ability to grapple with more complex issues. He said he likes to consider it to be analogous to how we might use Google Maps as a kind of digital twin of our trip to work, which is good at predicting different routes under current traffic conditions. But it will not tell you about the effect of a trip on your tires or the impact of wind on the aerodynamics of your car.
This is the first of a two-part series. In part 2, we’ll outline the future of digital twins and how organizations are finding solutions to the issues outlined here.
VentureBeat's mission is to be a digital town square for technical decision-makers to gain knowledge about transformative enterprise technology and transact. Learn more about membership.
Security at the speed of cyber: What is CISA’s Binding Operational Directive (BOD) 22-01?
The Biden Administration is continuing efforts to adopt new cybersecurity protocols in the face of ongoing attacks that threaten to disrupt critical public services, infringe on citizen data privacy and compromise national security.
On November 3, 2021, the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) issued a directive for federal agencies and contractors who manage hardware or software on an agency’s behalf to fix nearly 300 known cyber vulnerabilities that malicious actors can use to infiltrate and damage federal information systems. These known exploited vulnerabilities fall into two categories, each with a deadline for remediation:
90 vulnerabilities that were discovered in 2021 must be remediated by November 17
About 200 security vulnerabilities that were first identified between 2017 and 2020 must be remediated by May 3, 2022
As part of the directive, CISA also created a catalog of known exploited vulnerabilities that carry “significant risk” and outlined requirements for agencies to fix them. The catalog includes software and configurations supplied by software providers like SolarWinds and Kaseya, and large tech companies like Apple, Cisco, Google, Microsoft, Oracle and SAP.
Improving the nation’s cybersecurity defenses continues to be a top priority as the country has experienced an unprecedented year of cyberattacks. Malicious actors are continuing to target remote systems and prey on known vulnerabilities as the pandemic continues, leading to public service disruptions in telecommunications and utilities.
This directive comes just shy of six months since President Biden issued his Executive Order on Improving the Nation’s Cybersecurity, which aims to modernize cybersecurity defenses by protecting federal networks, strengthen information-sharing on cyber issues, and strengthen the United States’ ability to quickly respond to incidents when they occur.
While the Biden Administration and many federal agency heads agree that these actions are necessary to Boost cybersecurity protocols — they can be extraordinarily difficult to implement without the right tools.
In the next section, we will explore how federal agencies and their security teams can gain visibility across distributed environments to remediate vulnerabilities outlined in the directive.
Gaining visibility into federated IT environments
While most federal agencies are headquartered in Washington, D.C., field offices and agency staff are spread across the country, using many different endpoints (laptops, desktops, and servers) to access federal networks. This distributed IT environment can make it difficult for CISOs and their security teams to gain visibility into their agency’s environment in real time.
To comply with CISA’s BOD 22-01, security teams first need to gain visibility across federated IT environments and be able to answer a few basic questions, including:
How many endpoints are on the network?
Are these endpoints managed or unmanaged?
Do any known exploited vulnerabilities cataloged in the
directive exist in our environment? If so, do we currently have
the tools to patch them quickly and at scale?
Do we have the capability to confirm whether deployed
patches were applied correctly?
While these questions may seem straightforward, they often take agencies weeks or months to answer due to a highly federated
IT environment and the nature of IT management, which often includes tool sprawl and conflicting data sets — which is at odds with the aggressive timelines outlined in the directive.
With Tanium, CISOs and their security teams can discover previously unseen or unmanaged endpoints connected to federal networks, and then search for all applicable Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs) listed in the directive in minutes. With Tanium, it only takes a single agent on the endpoint to obtain compliance information, push patches and update software. Tanium provides a “single pane of glass” view to help align teams and prevent them from spending time gathering outdated endpoint data from various sources.
As CISA has committed to maintaining the catalog and alerting agencies of updates for awareness and action, having a unified endpoint management platform that provides visibility across an organization gives CISOs and their teams the tools they need to scan and patch future vulnerabilities at scale.
In the next section, we will explore how federal agencies and their security teams can prioritize actions and deploy patches to meet deadlines outlined in the directive.
Prioritizing actions and patching known vulnerabilities quickly
Once agency heads and their security teams have a clear picture of the state of their endpoints, the next step is to pinpoint known vulnerabilities and fix them fast based on associated deadlines in the directive.
With Tanium, federal agencies can search for the specific vulnerabilities listed in the directive and then patch those vulnerabilities in minutes, while having the confidence that patches were applied correctly. As a single lightweight agent, Tanium doesn’t weigh down the network. Remediation typically takes less than a day if an agency is already using Tanium. Existing customers should reference this step-by-step technical guidance on how to address the vulnerabilities laid out in the directive.
In addition to fixing known vulnerabilities, the directive also outlines other actions federal agencies must take, including:
Reviewing and updating internal vulnerability management procedures within 60 days.
At a minimum, agency policies must:
• Pave the way for automation around a single source of truth with high-fidelity data and remediate vulnerabilities that CISA identifies within a set timeline
• Assign roles and responsibilities for executing agency actions to align teams around a single source of truth
• Define necessary actions required to enable prompt responses • Establish internal validation and enforcement procedures to ensure adherence to the directive
• Set internal tracking and reporting requirements to evaluate adherence to the directive and provide reporting to
CISA, as needed
Reporting on the status of vulnerabilities listed in the catalog.
• Agencies are expected to automate data exchanges and report their respective directive implementation status through the CDM Federal Dashboard
As new threats and vulnerabilities are discovered, CISA will update the catalog of known vulnerabilities and alert agencies of updates for awareness and action.
Many federal agencies already use Tanium to provide visibility and maintain compliance across their distributed IT environment. Federal agencies can count on Tanium to be a valuable tool in discovering, patching and remediating future known critical vulnerabilities.
Tanium in action: scanning distributed networks and remediating at scale
While CISA has previously imposed cybersecurity mandates on federal agencies to immediately fix a critical software problem, this new directive is notable for its sheer scope and respective deadlines. Leveraging Tanium, federal agencies and contractors who manage hardware or software on an agency’s behalf can patch known critical vulnerabilities and comply with the deadlines in a fraction of the time.
The Tanium platform unifies security and IT operations teams using a “single pane of glass” approach of critical endpoint data, so that federal agencies can make informed decisions and act with lightning speed to minimize disruptions to mission-critical operations.
With Tanium, you can get rapid answers, real-time visibility and quickly take action when addressing current vulnerabilities in BOD 22-01. As CISA adds more vulnerabilities to the catalog, you can have confidence that Tanium is constantly checking for compliance and patching your endpoints quickly across your environment.
To learn more about how Tanium can help your agency remediate known vulnerabilities outlined in the CISA directive, visit Tanium.com/cisa
In this guest blog, Chris Darvill, solutions engineering vice president for Europe, Middle East and Africa (EMEA) at cloud-native API platform provider Kong, sets out why the humble API should not be overlooked when organisations are looking to make their IT setups more sustainable
Within the next 10 years, it’s predicted that 21% of all the energy consumed in the world will be by IT. Our mandates to digitally transform mean we’re patting ourselves on the back celebrating new ways we delight our customers, fuelled by electricity guzzled from things our planet can’t afford to give.
Addressing this isn’t about the steps we take at home to be a good citizen, such as recycling and turning off appliances when not in use. This is about the way we architect our systems.
Consider that Cisco estimates that global web traffic in 2021 exceeded 2.8 zettabytes. That equates to 21 trillion MP3 songs, or 2,658 songs for every single person on the planet. It’s almost 3 times the number of stars in the observable universe.
Now consider that 83% of this traffic is through APIs. While better APIs can’t alone Boost energy consumption (no one thing can), they do have the potential to make a big difference, which is why we need to be making technical and architectural decisions with this in mind.
Building better APIs isn’t just good for the planet and our consciences; it’s good for our business too. The more we can architect to reduce energy consumption, the more we can reduce our costs as well as our impact.
To reduce the energy consumption of our APIs, we must ensure they are as efficient as possible.
This means eliminating unnecessary processing, minimising their infrastructure footprint, and monitoring and governing their consumption so we aren’t left with API sprawl leaking energy usage all over the place.
APIs must be well-designed in the first place, not only to ensure they are consumable and therefore reused but also to ensure each API does what it needs to rather than what someone thinks it needs to.
If you’re building a customer API, do consumers need all the data rather than a subset? Sending 100 fields when most of the time consumers only use the top 10 means you’re wasting resources: You’re sending 90 unused and unhelpful bits of data every time that API is called.
Where do your APIs live? What are they written in? What do they do? There are many architectural, design and deployment decisions we make that have an impact on the resources they use.
We need the code itself to be efficient; something fortunately already prioritised as a slow API makes for a bad experience. There are nuances to this though when we think about optimising for energy consumption as well as performance. For example, an efficient service polling for updates every 10 seconds will consume more energy than an efficient service that just pushes updates when there are some.
And when there is an update, we just want the new data to be sent, not the full record. Consider the amount of traffic APIs create, and for anything that isn’t acted upon, is that traffic necessary at that time?
Deployment targets matter. Cloud providers have significant research and development (R&D) budgets to make their energy consumption as low as possible; budgets that no other company would be prepared to invest in their own datacentres.
However, with the annual electricity usage of the big five tech companies — Amazon, Google, Microsoft, Facebook and Apple — more or less the same as the entirety of New Zealand’s, it’s not as simple as moving to the cloud and the job being finished. How renewable are their energy sources? How much of their power comes from fossil fuels? The more cloud vendors see this being a factor in our evaluation of their services, the more we will compel them to prioritise sustainability as well as efficiency.
We must also consider the network traffic of our deployment topology. The more data we send, and the more data we send across networks, the more energy we use. We need to reduce any unnecessary network hops, even if the overall performance is good enough.
We must deploy our APIs near the systems they interact with, and we must deploy our gateways close to our APIs. Think how much traffic you’re generating if every single API request and response has to be routed through a gateway running somewhere entirely different.
To understand, and therefore minimise our API traffic, we need to manage it in a gateway. Policies like rate limiting control how many requests a client can make in any given time period; why let someone make 100 requests in one minute when one would do? Why let everyone make as many requests as they like, generating an uncontrolled amount of network traffic, rather than limiting this benefit to your top tier consumers?
Caching API responses prevents the API implementation code from executing anytime there’s a cache hit – an immediate reduction in processing power.
Policies give us visibility and control over every API request, so we know at all times how and if each API is used, where requests are coming from, performance and response times, and we can use this insight to optimize our API architecture.
For example, are there lots of requests for an API coming from a different continent to where it’s hosted? If so, consider redeploying the API local to the demand to reduce network traffic.
Are there unused APIs, sitting there idle? If so, consider decommissioning them to reduce your footprint. Is there a performance bottleneck? Investigate the cause and, if appropriate, consider refactoring the API implementation to be more efficient.
Having visibility and control over APIs and how they are consumed will greatly impact overall energy consumption.
We all happily switch between Google Drive, iCloud, Software-as-a-Service apps and the umpteen different applications we use day-to-day without thinking about their impact on the planet.
Thanks to privacy concerns, we have a growing awareness of how and where our data is transferred, stored and shared, but most of us do not have the same instinctive thought process when we think about carbon emissions rather than trust.
It’s time to make this a default behaviour. It’s time to accept, brainstorm and challenge each other that, as technologists, there are better ways for us to build applications and connect systems than we’ve previously considered.
At Cisco, we’re delivering solutions that expand access to education, enhance student experience, Boost engagement, and ignite innovation. With our broad portfolio and unmatched experience in networking, security, cloud, and collaboration, we’re creating a world where learning never stops. Join us in reimagining education.
At Cisco Meraki, we create intuitive technologies to optimize IT experiences, secure locations, and seamlessly connect people, places, and things. We love to push boundaries, experiment, and make IT easier, faster, and smarter for our customers. By doing this, we hope to connect passionate people to their mission by simplifying the digital workplace.
Founded in 2006, and acquired by Cisco in 2012, Meraki has grown to become an IT industry leader, with over 600,000 customers and 9 million network devices online around the world. Our cloud-based platform brings together data-powered products including, wireless, switching, security and SD-WAN, smart cameras, and sensors, open APIs and a broad partner ecosystem, and cloud-first operations.
As technology continues to take a larger role in corporate sustainability practices, CIOs can play a key role in driving both business value and environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance.
In fact, creating and implementing a comprehensive sustainable technology strategy must now be the core mission of a purpose-driven CIO.
Every executive in Accenture’s recent sustainable technology survey agreed that technology is critical for achieving sustainability goals. So why have only seven per cent of businesses fully integrated their technology and sustainability strategies?
In part, it’s because this will require a fundamental shift to a business model that will affect the role of the CIO, who may not even be aware that their expertise is needed to address these challenges.
Delivering on the promise of sustainable technology will require CIOs to take a seat at the sustainability table, where they must work in close collaboration with other executives to identify the technologies that will help their company achieve its ESG goals.
Despite how critically intertwined these goals are with technology investments and operations, less than half (49 per cent) of CIOs are included in their corporate leadership team’s decision-making processes around sustainability objectives and plans.
Without CIOs being involved in these core responsibilities, ESG targets suffer — which is particularly concerning when considering companies that take the lead on ESG issues outperform their competition financially, generating up to 2.6 times more value for shareholders than their peers.
Why are some companies slow to action?
Given how important sustainability metrics are to companies and their stakeholders, it is crucial to identify why it is taking so long for some organisations to jump on board with new technological innovations to implement meaningful change.
Research has uncovered the following challenges:
Examining these hurdles more closely, Accenture developed a Sustainable Technology Index, which ranks performance against the three elements on a scale of 0-1.
Interestingly, it revealed a “crowded middle” around the median score of 0.45, with roughly 60 per cent of companies posting scores within the range of 0.3 to 0.5. Put simply, this indicates that most organisations still have a long way to go in achieving a sustainable technology strategy, creating an opportunity — and sense of urgency — for CIOs to foster greater education and implementation of suitable solutions.
New responsibilities for CIOs
CIOs must be proactive in progressing these organisational shifts, as business leaders will continue to lean on them to ensure company technologies are providing solutions without contributing to an environmental problem.
While in years past this was not an active concern, the information and communications technology (ICT) sector has recently become a larger source of climate-related impact. Producing only 1.5 per cent of CO2 in 2007, the industry has now risen to four per cent today and will potentially reach 14 per cent by 2040.
Fortunately, CIOs can course-correct by focusing on three key areas:
As a first step in this transition, CIOs can begin assessing their organisation’s technology through the lens of sustainability to ensure that those goals are being thought about in every facet of the business.
In addition, they can connect with other leaders in the company to encourage greater emphasis and dialogue in cross-organisation planning for technology solutions as they relate to sustainability targets.
What are the benefits?
While the path to implementation requires comprehensive analysis and a proactive approach, a switch to sustainable technology leads to numerous benefits for the company, its sustainability goals, and CIOs themselves.
Sustainable technology contributes value across the board: 48 per cent of companies said that they saw increased revenue, 49 per cent saw a marked improvement in talent recruitment and business innovation, and 53 per cent said they’ve been able to use these changes to meet their ESG targets.
In fact, companies that adopt sustainable technology to a significant extent achieve four per cent higher ESG scores from Arabesque S-Ray, a global specialist in measuring ESG metrics.
Accenture
The emphasis on sustainable technologies also reflect a turning point in how organisations interact with CIOs. The expertise of these leaders is now needed across all aspects of the organisation, emerging as a strategic asset and a key part of a company’s sustainability DNA helping accomplish goals much larger than focusing solely on internal operations.
While these new responsibilities can certainly be daunting, they also mark a significant opportunity to transform the way a company views its technological resources, along with a turn in how company leaders and investors view and value CIOs as important decision-makers in the greater strategy of the organisation.
Endpoint Detection and Response Market report lists the leading competitors, type, application and provides the insights, strategic industry Analysis of the key factors influencing the market during 2022- 2027.
The “Endpoint Detection and Response Market” expected to grow considerably in the forecast period 2022- 2027. The Research report sheds light on Leading Players details with best facts and figures, meaning, definition, SWOT analysis, expert opinions and growth of Endpoint Detection and Response industry in upcoming years. Leading companies of Endpoint Detection and Response Market are: Carbon Black, Inc., Cisco Systems, Inc., … The report provides key statistics on the market status of the leading Endpoint Detection and Response market Trends, share and opportunities in the market.
The Endpoint Detection and Response market is expected to register a CAGR of over 22.87% during the forecast period 2021 – 2027. The report outlines cloud and on-premise service providers of endpoint detection and response software and service in various industries.
Get a sample copy of the report at-https://www.marketreportsworld.com/enquiry/request-sample/12347304
Company Coverage: –
– Carbon BlackInc.
– Cisco SystemsInc.
– CrowdstrikeInc.
– Symantec Corporation
– Cybereason Inc.
– Deep Instinct
– Digital Guardian
– FireeyeInc.
– Guidance SoftwareInc.
– McAfeeInc.
– RSA Security (EMC)
Get a sample Copy of the Endpoint Detection and Response Market Report 2022
Market Players Competitor Analysis:
Endpoint detection and response (EDR) tools and solutions emphasize on the investigation, detection, and easing of suspicious activities of various problems on endpoints and hosts. The market for EDR tools is increasing at significant momentum across the world, Thanks to the constant advancements in the new technologies of Artificial Intelligence (AI), cloud computing, and the Internet of Things (IoT). Its implementation across security and detection malware which helps to pave the new way for the more significant development of Endpoint detection and response (EDR).
Growing Demand for Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
Rise in the complexity and number of complex systems being deployed across the organizations, and strict compliance requirements and rules for generating and changing passwords make it complicated to manage a large number of passwords. Further, the Breach and data stolen problems often cause expensive delays and loss of productivity. Such issues are easily solved while using Endpoint Detection and Response solutions and software are used either the on-premise environment or in a hosted environment over the cloud. Increased instances of attacks, by hackers on the organizations have increased which led to the concern towards password security solutions, and this is helping in growing demand for password management solutions around the globe.
The rapidly growing cloud platform market presents a great opportunity in the hosted of Endpoint Detection and Response market. Low success of EDR self-service projects among end-users until now is a key concern among industry players. However, as the awareness of the benefits of deploying such a model is increasing it is anticipated that self-service solutions would find rising demand during the coming years.
As, according to Breach Level index, everyday 7,125,940 data records are being stolen or lost which led to the increase in the breach level. As the demand for the Endpoint detection and response market is directly related to the level of the breach or stolen of valuable information, the more data theft and breaches will be there, higher is the demand for Endpoint detection and response market.
North America the largest market in terms of global share
Due to the high availability of adequate infrastructure, the presence of numerous global financial institutions, high frequency of cyber-attacks, and increased adoption of technologies, is expected to drive the growth of the Endpoint Detection and Response market in North America region. Different enterprises (Small and medium) in this region are steadily adopting Endpoint Detection and Response market with additional support from the advent of modern technology and Internet of things (IoT). The occurrence of a large number of competitors in the market along with rising cases of cyber security and breach of valuable information is expected to drive the market. As the demand for the Endpoint Detection and Response market is directly related to the data breach, the more data breach around the globe, higher is the demand for Endpoint Detection and Response market.
Key developments in the market
• Feb 2021: Cisco offers new Cloud-Based Endpoint Security Solutions for the Managed Security Service Providers. With this product innovation it will help to provides advanced internet security, malware protection, and enterprise mobility management.
• Oct 2017: Symantec introduces new endpoint security for the cloud generation to defense against cyber-attacks such as WannaCry and Petya. With this product innovation, the new security solutions can apply across all devices, networks, and applications to combat growing threats.
Major players: CARBON BLACK, INC., CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., CROWDSTRIKE, INC., SYMANTEC CORPORATION, CYBEREASON INC., DEEP INSTINCT, DIGITAL GUARDIAN, FIREEYE, INC., GUIDANCE SOFTWARE, INC., MCAFEE, INC., and RSA SECURITY (EMC), among others.
To Understand How COVID-19 Impact is Covered in This Report. Get sample copy of the report at –https://www.marketreportsworld.com/enquiry/request-covid19/12347304
Reasons to Purchase this Report:
Customization of the Report:
Enquire before Purchasing this report at-https://www.marketreportsworld.com/enquiry/pre-order-enquiry/12347304
Regional Analysis: –
– North America
– Asia-Pacific
– Europe
– South America
– Africa
Some Major Points from TOC: –
1. Introduction
1.1. Key Study Deliverables
1.2. Market Definition
1.3. Study Assumptions
2. Research Methodology
3. Executive Summary
4. Market Insights
4.1. Endpoint Detection and Response Market Overview
4.2. Porter’s Five Forces Analysis
4.2.1. Bargaining Power of Suppliers
4.2.2. Bargaining Power of Consumers
4.2.3. Threat of New Entrants
4.2.4. Threat of Substitute Products and Services
4.2.5. Competitive Rivalry in the Industry
4.3. Industry Value Chain Analysis
4.4. Industry Policies
5. Market Dynamics
5.1. Endpoint Detection and Response Market Drivers
5.1.1. High Proliferation Of IoT and SMART Devices
5.1.2. Increasing Demand to Reduce IT Security Risk
5.1.3. Increasing Instances of Enterprise Endpoint Targeted Attacks
5.2. Endpoint Detection and Response Market Challenges
5.2.1. High Demand for Integrated Security Solutions and Lack of Technological Awareness of EDR Solutions 5.2.2. Shortage of Skilled Workforce
6. Technology Snapshot
7. Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Market – Segmentation
7.1. Endpoint Detection and Response Market By Deployment Type
7.1.1. Cloud
7.1.2. On-premise
7.2. Endpoint Detection and Response Market By Component
7.2.1. Solutions
7.2.2. Services
7.3. Endpoint Detection and Response Market By Solution Type
7.3.1. Workstations
7.3.2. Mobile Devices
7.3.3. Servers
7.3.4. Point of Sale Terminals
7.3.5. Others
7.4. Endpoint Detection and Response Market By Organization Size
7.4.1. Small and Medium Enterprises
7.4.2. Large Enterprises
7.5. Endpoint Detection and Response Market By End-user Industry
7.5.1. BFSI
7.5.2. IT and Telecom
7.5.3. Manufacturing
7.5.4. Healthcare
7.5.5. Retail
7.5.6. Others
7.6. Endpoint Detection and Response Market By Region
7.6.1. North America Endpoint Detection and Response Market
7.6.1.1. United States
7.6.1.2. Canada
7.6.2. Europe
7.6.2.1. United Kingdom
7.6.2.2. Germany
7.6.2.3. France
7.6.2.4. Rest of Europe
7.6.3. Asia-Pacific
7.6.3.1. Japan
7.6.3.2. China
7.6.3.3. India
7.6.3.4. Rest of Asia-Pacific
7.6.4. Latin America
7.6.5. Middle East and Africa
8. Endpoint Detection and Response Market Companies
8.1. Carbon Black Inc.
8.2. Cisco Systems Inc.
8.3. Crowdstrike Inc.
8.4. Symantec Corporation
8.5. Cybereason Inc.
8.6. Deep Instinct
8.7. Digital Guardian
8.8 Fireeye Inc.
8.9. Guidance Software Inc.
8.10. Panda Security
8.11. Sophos Group PLC
8.12. Gemalto
8.13. F-Secure
8.14. Fortinet
8.15. RSA Security (EMC)
*List Not Exhaustive
9 .Endpoint Detection and Response Market Investment Analysis
10. Future of the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Market AAAA
Browse complete table of contents at-https://www.marketreportsworld.com/TOC/12347304
About Us:-
Market Reports Worldis the Credible Source for Gaining the Market Reports that will Provide you with the Lead Your Business Needs. Market is changing rapidly with the ongoing expansion of the industry. Advancement in the technology has provided today’s businesses with multifaceted advantages resulting in daily economic shifts. Thus, it is very important for a company to comprehend the patterns of the market movements in order to strategize better. An efficient strategy offers the companies with a head start in planning and an edge over the competitors.
CONTACT US
Email: [email protected]
Phone: US +(1) 424 253 0946 /UK +(44) 203 239 8187
Press Release Distributed by The Express Wire
To view the original version on The Express Wire visit Endpoint Detection and Response Market Size In 2022 is estimated to grow at a modest CAGR| Latest Trend, Competitors
How many video meetings have you taken this week? Chances are the answer isn't none. Video conferencing has become the new normal for most businesses, particularly those that have embraced hybrid work. Even before the COVID-19 pandemic made working from home a necessity, many companies were cutting back on work-related travel and using video conferencing to connect workers in satellite offices or even in conference rooms on different floors. This new reality means it's critical to invest in the best video conferencing system you can find.
The proprietary end-to-end systems you've probably seen deployed in smart conference rooms are still around, but the star players today are cloud services that require little more than an account and a webcam. We're focusing on these for this review roundup, since they're the most relevant to remote work. But first, you'll need a good understanding of how they work.
We've come a long way from the proprietary video conferencing systems of yesteryear. Today's cloud video services use TCP/IP as the primary network protocol. The majority of video calls go over the internet, rather than a private LAN. Also, their hardware support is generally open, meaning you can use whatever webcam or microphone works with your computing device. These new services often support an entirely web browser-based experience without the need to install any app (though a standalone app usually gives the best experience). Mobile devices are typically supported too, including apps for Android, Chrome OS, and iOS.
The challenge with these systems is that they typically don't interoperate. For example, you can't attend a video conference initiated in Microsoft Teams using a Cisco Webex meeting client. That means that if your workers need to join a video meeting with a company that uses a different system than yours, they'll either need to install a compatible client or rely on their browsers. On the other hand, the advantage is that these systems no longer require one large system purchase. Instead, they are services offered on a per-user or per-host subscription basis (see below for more about hosts). This can seriously reduce costs, as we'll see later.
Modern video conferencing systems also offer a big bucket of new capabilities that older systems never had. Best-in-class video conferencing services let users share their screens, remotely access one another's desktops, chat via text, exchange files, communicate via digital whiteboards, and even broadcast conferences to large groups of passive viewers (like webinars). Some are part of business-geared Voice-over-IP (VoIP) packages that let you dynamically change a voice call to a video call or initiate a shared meeting at the touch of a button without ever losing the original connection.
Those features are great for central offices, but they're also fantastic communication aids for work-from-home scenarios, especially when viewed through a long-term lens. However, video conferencing can go even further. For example, it's a perfect tool for addressing customers' support questions live or interacting with customers in real-time during a webinar. These and other factors are likely to continue to drive user adoption of these services for at least the next few years, as shown by growth projections from Fortune Business Insights:
Many of us were introduced to video conferencing in the COVID-19 era. But even pre-pandemic, many small to midsize businesses (SMBs) spread across geographic locations. While that trend has both cost and hiring benefits to most companies, it also brings complex challenges for communication. Face-to-face meetings often aren't feasible due to limits on travel expenditures, and that's also true for customers and partners. This is where video conferencing can deliver a serious boost to your company's bottom line.
Even without considering geography, video conferencing can save money. Many of the new collaboration features included with this round of contenders aim to automate tasks that used to cost extra. Two prime examples are meeting transcription and recording.
In older, proprietary systems, recording a meeting meant either a separate camera or a third-party microphone for audio-only recordings, plus server space for storage. Modern services have automated recording that you can initiate with the press of a button and then automatically save the recording to the cloud and auto-share it with all meeting attendees.
Transcription, too, used to cost extra, with meeting managers sending an audio recording to a transcription service. Many new video conferencing services now contain artificial intelligence (AI) in the form of virtual meeting assistants that manage things like attendance tracking and transcribing meetings directly to PDF or Microsoft Word documents. They can then send those docs to everyone in the discussion or save them in shared cloud storage.
As with many software services, video conferencing providers offer multiple pricing tiers. The prices quoted in our reviews are typically for the vendor's middle pricing tier, and those are usually charged on a per-user per-month basis. For more pricing information, click through to the individual reviews. Most video conferencing services offer free trials, typically for 30 days, and many don't require a credit card. That means you don't have to worry about being charged automatically when the trial ends.
Most services offer free plans with a limited feature set. These can be great for individuals who want to reach friends and family, or for distributed teams who don't plan to spend a lot of time in conferences. Once you move to a paid tier, however, you need to pay attention to pricing details. For example, many products tested charge differently for hosts and users. Digging through the fine print, you'll find that hosts are users that can initiate meetings. Not all companies need to make every user a host, depending on how your organization handles collaboration. That can have a significant impact on your overall price, so be sure to nail down the details before buying.
Many services scale their pricing based on the number of hosts and attendees you need. That's why we recommend not just using the features in our top-rated video conferencing services; you should also leverage that trial time to experiment with how many users need to have meeting manager status. In other words, evaluate how video conferencing best fits your organization's culture and workflows.
Generally, services that are priced per host instead of per user are more cost-effective for webinar-type environments, where a few hosts will present to many attendees (users). Plans that are priced per user tend to be more attractive to collaborative-style engagements where anyone could start a meeting.
Another price consideration is hardware. Most every laptop has a microphone and a serviceable (if fairly mediocre) integrated webcam. Some laptops, such as the 2021 Apple MacBook Pro and Microsoft Surface, ship with high-quality 1080p webcams, and the same goes for many higher-end mobile devices.
Desktop PCs, however, will need additional hardware. If you're looking for enhanced clarity of sound or video, you'll need the best microphones and high-end webcams you can get. Depending on how many desktops and conference rooms you're looking to outfit this way, you can significantly affect the overall cost of your video conferencing solution, so you should budget for that upfront.
Because video conferencing is likely to be a new way of working for many employees, which in turn means a platform's ease of use is a great place to compare one vendor's capabilities with another's.
In each review, we discuss the ease of signing up, creating a meeting, inviting participants, and setting up audio and video controls for each review. We also look at the user experience (UX) from the meeting invitees' point of view and how easy it is to access smart meeting controls. That covers whiteboard-style collaboration and file sharing, annotation, and the virtual assistant features mentioned above.
We've also tested each service's prominent features, but it's up to you to decide which features you need most. Do you need dial-in numbers, VoIP support, or both? How about features like screen sharing or remote control? Some services offer both teleconferencing with dial-in numbers (local or toll-free) and VoIP calling, while some offer just one or the other. A few offer international dial-in numbers.
All of the products reviewed offer video calls via webcam, which is a feature that's creeping into several team messaging platforms, like Microsoft Teams and Slack. In Teams' case, this is a complete video conferencing solution, which is why we've reviewed it here. On the other hand, Slack and some of its competitors have only implemented person-to-person video calling, which is why we haven't included them in this roundup.
However, Slack's strength in this regard (and it's a strength shared by its competitors) is its very long list of out-of-the-box integration options. While you can only do person-to-person video. inside Slack itself, the platform also integrates with Google Workspace, Teams, Zoom, and a host of other communications platforms, including the ones we've reviewed here. A skilled Slack administrator can build full meeting functionality this way.
In all of these reviews, we hosted and joined meetings to test the experience of registered and non-registered users alike. We made sure to outline how easy it is to join a meeting, including whether a participant needs to obtain software before joining (which could cause a delay). When that's the case, it's important to communicate with employees about hardware compatibility and your preferred browser. Other services simply require that attendees enter a code to access the meeting.
Our reviews also cover the host's administration features. The best services let you set up various types of meetings, such as lecture-style meetings where all participants are muted, or a discussion or Q&A mode in which presenters can mute and unmute participants as needed. Other options include enabling and disabling webcams, locking latecomers out of a meeting, creating a waiting room while preparing for the meeting, and allowing break-out sessions.
For presentations, screen sharing is essential. But so are more granular options, such as the ability to share just one , document, image, or application (Microsoft PowerPoint, for example), not just your entire desktop. Most of the video conferencing services in this roundup also offer a text chat mode not only during a meeting but sometimes outside a video call, too.
During a trial, you should experiment with all these features and think carefully about how much genuine collaboration you need in your various meetings. That means evaluating the service with more than just IT personnel. You should also include stakeholders from your various departments, so you've got an accurate representation of the different kinds of gatherings your employees hold between themselves and folks outside the organization.
Unfortunately, even in a centralized network like the one in your main office, working with any stream-dependent app, and especially video, becomes trickier the larger the network and the more apps there are competing for bandwidth. If you're running all or part of your solution on a high-traffic network, some network settings may need tweaking by your IT staff to minimize video artifacts, stuttering, or excessive buffering that pauses the stream.
The situation is even more complicated for remote workers. This could be a persistent problem for your IT help desk personnel, who will have little control over the consumer devices and home network routers that will power your remote employees' home offices. Then there are additional peripherals, such as webcams and microphones. Most of these weren't purchased by the IT department, which means IT support staffers haven't been trained to service them. All of this makes supporting those home users on an end-to-end basis very difficult. That's not even considering the conditions on the internet, which handles most of the network traffic (and is something that your IT department doesn't control, either).
Most businesses will have little choice but to handle this problem on a case-by-case basis. If an IT pro can service a router remotely, that's what happens. If not, then it's down to either sending the device to a central location to be reconfigured, or walking the employee through the required steps over the phone.
Because of these concerns, it's a good idea to develop long-term solutions for remote workers. For example, IT could pre-configure a number of router models and then distribute them to remote workers so that everyone is using the same platform.
Virtual private networks (VPNs) are another related problem. Many businesses require employees to use these services when working remotely, both to protect themselves from cyber-attacks and to protect corporate data. Because they use encryption, VPNs can often cause bandwidth or throughput problems that affect video streaming performance. They're also run by companies other than your video conferencing vendor, so supporting the combination of the two usually ends up as an internal problem.
To help, you'll need to investigate VPN offerings for remote connections and potentially work with your IT staff to implement Quality of Service (QoS) features on both your main network and users' home networks. That'll help protect the bandwidth required during your video conferences. Still, be aware that the public internet remains its own beast and problems will inevitably arise that are outside the control of your IT staff.
Don't discount support resources from your vendor. The best video conferencing services offer phone, email, and chat support in addition to extensive online documentation. End-user support in this manner may cost extra money, but it's worth considering if your IT staff is small. Checking for a professional services arm that helps train users and IT pros is another important factor, and an active user community is a good resource, too.
The MarketWatch News Department was not involved in the creation of this content.
Jul 07, 2022 (The Expresswire) -- ""SDN and NFV Market"" Insights 2022 : SDN and NFV market size is projected to reach USD 96510 million by 2028, from USD 32940 million in 2021, at a CAGR of 16.4% during 2022-2028.. By Applications {Telecom and IT, BFSI, Government and Public Utilities, Manufacturing, Others}, By Types {SDN, NFV}, Regions and Forecast to 2028. The SDN and NFV Market Report Contains 116 pages Including Full TOC, Tables and Figures, and Chart with In-depth Analysis.
We have been tracking the direct impact of COVID-19 on this market, as well as the indirect impact from other industries. This report analyzes the impact of the pandemic on the SDN and NFV market from a Global and Regional perspective. The report outlines the market size, market characteristics, and market growth for SDN and NFV industry, categorized by type, application, and consumer sector. In addition, it provides a comprehensive analysis of aspects involved in market development before and after the Covid-19 pandemic. Report also conducted a PESTEL analysis in the industry to study key influencers and barriers to entry.
Final Report will add the analysis of the impact of COVID-19 on this industry.
TO KNOW HOW COVID-19 PANDEMIC AND RUSSIA UKRAINE WAR WILL IMPACT THIS MARKET - REQUEST SAMPLE
It also provides accurate information and cutting-edge analysis that is necessary to formulate an ideal business plan, and to define the right path for rapid growth for all involved industry players. With this information, stakeholders will be more capable of developing new strategies, which focus on market opportunities that will benefit them, making their business endeavours profitable in the process.
Get a sample PDF of report -https://www.marketgrowthreports.com/enquiry/request-sample/19866408
SDN and NFV Market - Competitive and Segmentation Analysis:
This SDN and NFV Market report offers detailed analysis supported by reliable statistics on sale and revenue by players for the period 2017-2022. The report also includes company description, major business, SDN and NFV product introduction, recent developments and SDN and NFV sales by region, type, application and by sales channel.
The major players covered in the SDN and NFV market report are:
● Cisco
● Ericsson
● Huawei
● Nokia
● Intel
● HP
● IBM
● Juniper Networks
● Broadcom
● Dell
● Oracle
● NEC (Netcracker)
● Ciena (Blue Planet)
● Arista Networks
● Amdocs
● Comarch
● ZTE
● H3C
Short Summery About SDN and NFV Market :
The Global SDN and NFV market is anticipated to rise at a considerable rate during the forecast period, between 2022 and 2028. In 2021, the market is growing at a steady rate and with the rising adoption of strategies by key players, the market is expected to rise over the projected horizon.
Virtualization is enabling networking to design, implement, and manage network services far more efficiently than all premise bases. Among virtualization, SND and NFV are the two key technologies enabling the transition.
Market Analysis and Insights: Global SDN and NFV Market
The global SDN and NFV market size is projected to reach USD 96510 million by 2028, from USD 32940 million in 2021, at a CAGR of 16.4% during 2022-2028.
Two technology trends that are transforming network management, particularly those that are widely-distributed and employ public, private or hybrid cloud services, are software-defined networks (SDN) and network functions virtualization (NFV).
North America, Europe, APAC are the representative regions, and the local vendors play important roles. NFV is expected to be more than SDN market, and has higher growth rate in the following years. The application field is mainly in Telecom and IT, BFSI, Government and Public Utilities currently. In addition, wider application scenario such as medical, energy and education will rise in the future.
SDN and NFV industry concentration is relatively high. Top players such as Cisco, Ericsson, Huawei, Nokia, Intel, HP have market share more than 20% in total. United States has many vendors. The market entrance barrier is high.
With industry-standard accuracy in analysis and high data integrity, the report makes a brilliant attempt to unveil key opportunities available in the global SDN and NFV market to help players in achieving a strong market position. Buyers of the report can access Tested and reliable market forecasts, including those for the overall size of the global SDN and NFV market in terms of revenue.
Overall, the report proves to be an effective tool that players can use to gain a competitive edge over their competitors and ensure lasting success in the global SDN and NFV market. All of the findings, data, and information provided in the report are validated and revalidated with the help of trustworthy sources. The analysts who have authored the report took a unique and industry-best research and analysis approach for an in-depth study of the global SDN and NFV market.
Global SDN and NFV Scope and Market Size
SDN and NFV market is segmented by players, region (country), by Type and by Application. Players, stakeholders, and other participants in the global SDN and NFV market will be able to gain the upper hand as they use the report as a powerful resource. The segmental analysis focuses on revenue and forecast by Type and by Application for the period 2017-2028.
Get a sample Copy of the SDN and NFV Market Report 2022
Report further studies the market development status and future SDN and NFV Market trend across the world. Also, it splits SDN and NFV market Segmentation by Type and by Applications to fully and deeply research and reveal market profile and prospects.
On the basis of product typethis report displays the production, revenue, price, market share and growth rate of each type, primarily split into:
● SDN
● NFV
On the basis of the end users/applicationsthis report focuses on the status and outlook for major applications/end users, consumption (sales), market share and growth rate for each application, including:
● Telecom and IT
● BFSI
● Government and Public Utilities
● Manufacturing
● Others
SDN and NFV Market - Regional Analysis:
Geographically, this report is segmented into several key regions, with sales, revenue, market share and growth Rate of SDN and NFV in these regions, from 2015 to 2027, covering
● North America (United States, Canada and Mexico) ● Europe (Germany, UK, France, Italy, Russia and Turkey etc.) ● Asia-Pacific (China, Japan, Korea, India, Australia, Indonesia, Thailand, Philippines, Malaysia and Vietnam) ● South America (Brazil, Argentina, Columbia etc.) ● Middle East and Africa (Saudi Arabia, UAE, Egypt, Nigeria and South Africa)Some of the key questions answered in this report:
● What is the global (North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, South America, Middle East and Africa) sales value, production value, consumption value, import and export of SDN and NFV? ● Who are the global key manufacturers of the SDN and NFV Industry? How is their operating situation (capacity, production, sales, price, cost, gross, and revenue)? ● What are the SDN and NFV market opportunities and threats faced by the vendors in the global SDN and NFV Industry? ● Which application/end-user or product type may seek incremental growth prospects? What is the market share of each type and application? ● What focused approach and constraints are holding the SDN and NFV market? ● What are the different sales, marketing, and distribution channels in the global industry? ● What are the upstream raw materials and manufacturing equipment of SDN and NFV along with the manufacturing process of SDN and NFV? ● What are the key market trends impacting the growth of the SDN and NFV market? ● Economic impact on the SDN and NFV industry and development trend of the SDN and NFV industry. ● What are the market opportunities, market risk, and market overview of the SDN and NFV market? ● What are the key drivers, restraints, opportunities, and challenges of the SDN and NFV market, and how they are expected to impact the market? ● What is the SDN and NFV market size at the regional and country-level?Our research analysts will help you to get customized details for your report, which can be modified in terms of a specific region, application or any statistical details. In addition, we are always willing to comply with the study, which triangulated with your own data to make the market research more comprehensive in your perspective.
Inquire more and share questions if any before the purchase on this report at -https://www.marketgrowthreports.com/enquiry/pre-order-enquiry/19866408
Detailed TOC of Global SDN and NFV Market Research Report 2022
1 SDN and NFV Market Overview
1.1 Product Overview and Scope of SDN and NFV
1.2 SDN and NFV Segment by Type
1.2.1 Global SDN and NFV Market Size Growth Rate Analysis by Type 2022 VS 2028
1.3 SDN and NFV Segment by Application
1.3.1 Global SDN and NFV Consumption Comparison by Application: 2022 VS 2028
1.4 Global Market Growth Prospects
1.4.1 Global SDN and NFV Revenue Estimates and Forecasts (2017-2028)
1.4.2 Global SDN and NFV Production Capacity Estimates and Forecasts (2017-2028)
1.4.3 Global SDN and NFV Production Estimates and Forecasts (2017-2028)
1.5 Global Market Size by Region
1.5.1 Global SDN and NFV Market Size Estimates and Forecasts by Region: 2017 VS 2021 VS 2028
1.5.2 North America SDN and NFV Estimates and Forecasts (2017-2028)
1.5.3 Europe SDN and NFV Estimates and Forecasts (2017-2028)
1.5.4 China SDN and NFV Estimates and Forecasts (2017-2028)
1.5.5 Japan SDN and NFV Estimates and Forecasts (2017-2028)
2 Market Competition by Manufacturers
2.1 Global SDN and NFV Production Capacity Market Share by Manufacturers (2017-2022)
2.2 Global SDN and NFV Revenue Market Share by Manufacturers (2017-2022)
2.3 SDN and NFV Market Share by Company Type (Tier 1, Tier 2 and Tier 3)
2.4 Global SDN and NFV Average Price by Manufacturers (2017-2022)
2.5 Manufacturers SDN and NFV Production Sites, Area Served, Product Types
2.6 SDN and NFV Market Competitive Situation and Trends
2.6.1 SDN and NFV Market Concentration Rate
2.6.2 Global 5 and 10 Largest SDN and NFV Players Market Share by Revenue
2.6.3 Mergers and Acquisitions, Expansion
3 Production Capacity by Region
3.1 Global Production Capacity of SDN and NFV Market Share by Region (2017-2022)
3.2 Global SDN and NFV Revenue Market Share by Region (2017-2022)
3.3 Global SDN and NFV Production Capacity, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2017-2022)
3.4 North America SDN and NFV Production
3.4.1 North America SDN and NFV Production Growth Rate (2017-2022)
3.4.2 North America SDN and NFV Production Capacity, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2017-2022)
3.5 Europe SDN and NFV Production
3.5.1 Europe SDN and NFV Production Growth Rate (2017-2022)
3.5.2 Europe SDN and NFV Production Capacity, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2017-2022)
3.6 China SDN and NFV Production
3.6.1 China SDN and NFV Production Growth Rate (2017-2022)
3.6.2 China SDN and NFV Production Capacity, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2017-2022)
3.7 Japan SDN and NFV Production
3.7.1 Japan SDN and NFV Production Growth Rate (2017-2022)
3.7.2 Japan SDN and NFV Production Capacity, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2017-2022)
4 Global SDN and NFV Consumption by Region
4.1 Global SDN and NFV Consumption by Region
4.1.1 Global SDN and NFV Consumption by Region
4.1.2 Global SDN and NFV Consumption Market Share by Region
4.2 North America
4.2.1 North America SDN and NFV Consumption by Country
4.2.2 United States
4.2.3 Canada
4.3 Europe
4.3.1 Europe SDN and NFV Consumption by Country
4.3.2 Germany
4.3.3 France
4.3.4 U.K.
4.3.5 Italy
4.3.6 Russia
4.4 Asia Pacific
4.4.1 Asia Pacific SDN and NFV Consumption by Region
4.4.2 China
4.4.3 Japan
4.4.4 South Korea
4.4.5 China Taiwan
4.4.6 Southeast Asia
4.4.7 India
4.4.8 Australia
4.5 Latin America
4.5.1 Latin America SDN and NFV Consumption by Country
4.5.2 Mexico
4.5.3 Brazil
Get a sample Copy of the SDN and NFV Market Report 2022
5 Segment by Type
5.1 Global SDN and NFV Production Market Share by Type (2017-2022)
5.2 Global SDN and NFV Revenue Market Share by Type (2017-2022)
5.3 Global SDN and NFV Price by Type (2017-2022)
6 Segment by Application
6.1 Global SDN and NFV Production Market Share by Application (2017-2022)
6.2 Global SDN and NFV Revenue Market Share by Application (2017-2022)
6.3 Global SDN and NFV Price by Application (2017-2022)
7 Key Companies Profiled
7.1 Company
7.1.1 SDN and NFV Corporation Information
7.1.2 SDN and NFV Product Portfolio
7.1. CSDN and NFV Production Capacity, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2017-2022)
7.1.4 Company’s Main Business and Markets Served
7.1.5 Company’s recent Developments/Updates
8 SDN and NFV Manufacturing Cost Analysis
8.1 SDN and NFV Key Raw Materials Analysis
8.1.1 Key Raw Materials
8.1.2 Key Suppliers of Raw Materials
8.2 Proportion of Manufacturing Cost Structure
8.3 Manufacturing Process Analysis of SDN and NFV
8.4 SDN and NFV Industrial Chain Analysis
9 Marketing Channel, Distributors and Customers
9.1 Marketing Channel
9.2 SDN and NFV Distributors List
9.3 SDN and NFV Customers
10 Market Dynamics
10.1 SDN and NFV Industry Trends
10.2 SDN and NFV Market Drivers
10.3 SDN and NFV Market Challenges
10.4 SDN and NFV Market Restraints
11 Production and Supply Forecast
11.1 Global Forecasted Production of SDN and NFV by Region (2023-2028)
11.2 North America SDN and NFV Production, Revenue Forecast (2023-2028)
11.3 Europe SDN and NFV Production, Revenue Forecast (2023-2028)
11.4 China SDN and NFV Production, Revenue Forecast (2023-2028)
11.5 Japan SDN and NFV Production, Revenue Forecast (2023-2028)
12 Consumption and Demand Forecast
12.1 Global Forecasted Demand Analysis of SDN and NFV
12.2 North America Forecasted Consumption of SDN and NFV by Country
12.3 Europe Market Forecasted Consumption of SDN and NFV by Country
12.4 Asia Pacific Market Forecasted Consumption of SDN and NFV by Region
12.5 Latin America Forecasted Consumption of SDN and NFV by Country
13 Forecast by Type and by Application (2023-2028)
13.1 Global Production, Revenue and Price Forecast by Type (2023-2028)
13.1.1 Global Forecasted Production of SDN and NFV by Type (2023-2028)
13.1.2 Global Forecasted Revenue of SDN and NFV by Type (2023-2028)
13.1.3 Global Forecasted Price of SDN and NFV by Type (2023-2028)
13.2 Global Forecasted Consumption of SDN and NFV by Application (2023-2028)
13.2.1 Global Forecasted Production of SDN and NFV by Application (2023-2028)
13.2.2 Global Forecasted Revenue of SDN and NFV by Application (2023-2028)
13.2.3 Global Forecasted Price of SDN and NFV by Application (2023-2028)
14 Research Finding and Conclusion
15 Methodology and Data Source
15.1 Methodology/Research Approach
15.1.1 Research Programs/Design
15.1.2 Market Size Estimation
15.1.3 Market Breakdown and Data Triangulation
15.2 Data Source
15.2.1 Secondary Sources
15.2.2 Primary Sources
15.3 Author List
15.4 Disclaimer
Continued….
Purchase this report (Price 4900 USD for a single-user license) -https://www.marketgrowthreports.com/purchase/19866408
About Us:
Market is changing rapidly with the ongoing expansion of the industry. Advancement in the technology has provided today’s businesses with multifaceted advantages resulting in daily economic shifts. Thus, it is very important for a company to comprehend the patterns of the market movements in order to strategize better. An efficient strategy offers the companies with a head start in planning and an edge over the competitors. Market Growth Reports is the credible source for gaining the market reports that will provide you with the lead your business needs.
Contact Us:
Market growth reports
Phone : US +1 424 253 0946
UK +44 203 239 8187
Email :sales@marketgrowthreports.com
Web : https://www.marketgrowthreports.com
For More Related Reports Click Here :Aseptic Filling Machine for Vials Market
Hyperpigmentation Treatment Market
Contract Analytics Software Market
Press Release Distributed by The Express Wire
To view the original version on The Express Wire visit SDN and NFV Market Size is Increasing and Having a Big Impact on the Industry with PESTAL & SWOT Analysis till 2028 | No of Pages 116
COMTEX_409840532/2598/2022-07-07T23:53:40
Is there a problem with this press release? Contact the source provider Comtex at editorial@comtex.com. You can also contact MarketWatch Customer Service via our Customer Center.
The MarketWatch News Department was not involved in the creation of this content.