The MarketWatch News Department was not involved in the creation of this content.
Feb 13, 2023 (The Expresswire) -- Network Troubleshooting Software Market Size 2023-2029 | New Report (122 Pages) | In This Reports Network Troubleshooting Software Market and its business scene, significant issues, answers for relieving the upgrading risk, methodologies, future lookout, and possibilities, Other than the standard design reports, Top Network Troubleshooting Software Companies (Pingman Tools, Martello Technologies, Obkio, Tarlogic Security, Splunk, SolarWinds Network Management, Integrated Research, Spiceworks, ThousandEyes, Cisco, InfoVista, Domotz, SolarWinds MSP, Flowmon Networks, Savvius, SolarWinds, NetBrain Technologies, LiveAction, Riverbed Technologies, Sinefa, ManageEngine) with the best facts and figures, definitions, SWOT and PESTAL analysis, expert opinions and the latest trends around the world.
To know How COVID-19 and Russia-Ukraine War Influence Will Impact This Market/Industry-Request a sample copy of the report-:https://www.researchreportsworld.com/enquiry/request-covid19/20718864
Moreover, the Network Troubleshooting Software Market Report includes data on research and development, New product launches, product feedback from global and regional markets by key players. This structured analysis provides a graphical representation and strategic breakdown of the Network Troubleshooting Software market by region.
Who are the key players in the Network Troubleshooting Software market?
List of TOP KEY PLAYERS in Network Troubleshooting Software Market Report are: -
● Pingman Tools
● Martello Technologies
● Obkio
● Tarlogic Security
● Splunk
● SolarWinds Network Management
● Integrated Research
● Spiceworks
● ThousandEyes
● Cisco
● InfoVista
● Domotz
● SolarWinds MSP
● Flowmon Networks
● Savvius
● SolarWinds
● NetBrain Technologies
● LiveAction
● Riverbed Technologies
● Sinefa
● ManageEngine
Get a sample PDF of the Network Troubleshooting Software Market Report
Network Troubleshooting Software Market Analysis and Insights
This report aims to provide a comprehensive presentation of the global market for Network Troubleshooting Software, with both quantitative and qualitative analysis, to help readers develop business/growth strategies, assess the market competitive situation, analyze their position in the current marketplace, and make informed business decisions regarding Network Troubleshooting Software.
The Network Troubleshooting Software market size, estimations, and forecasts are provided in terms of and revenue (USD millions), considering 2023 as the base year, with history and forecast data for the period from 2017 to 2029. This report segments the global Network Troubleshooting Software market comprehensively. Regional market sizes, concerning products by types, by application, and by players, are also provided. The influence of COVID-19 and the Russia-Ukraine War were considered while estimating market sizes.
“The Research Report includes specific segments by region (country), by company, by Type and by Application. This study provides information about the sales and revenue during the historic and forecasted period of 2017 to 2029.” Ask For sample Report
For a more in-depth understanding of the market, the report provides profiles of the competitive landscape, key competitors, and their respective market ranks. The report also discusses technological trends and new product developments.
The report will help the Network Troubleshooting Software companies, new entrants, and industry chain related companies in this market with information on the revenues for the overall market and the sub-segments across the different segments, by company, product type, application, and regions.
Get a sample PDF of the report at -https://www.researchreportsworld.com/enquiry/request-sample/20718864
What segments are covered Network Troubleshooting Software Market report?
Product Type Insights
Global markets are presented by Network Troubleshooting Software type, along with growth forecasts through 2029. Estimates on revenue are based on the price in the supply chain at which the Network Troubleshooting Software are procured by the companies.
This report has studied every segment and provided the market size using historical data. They have also talked about the growth opportunities that the segment may pose in the future. This study bestows revenue data by type, and during the historical period (2017-2023) and forecast period (2023-2029).
Segmentby Type - Network Troubleshooting Software Market
● Cloud-Based ● On-PremisesApplication Insights
This report has provided the market size (revenue data) by application, during the historical period (2018-2023) and forecast period (2023-2029).
This report also outlines the market trends of each segment and consumer behaviors impacting the Network Troubleshooting Software market and what implications these may have on the industry's future. This report can help to understand the relevant market and consumer trends that are driving the Network Troubleshooting Software market.
Segment by Application - Network Troubleshooting Software Market
● Large Enterprises ● Medium-Sized Enterprise ● Small EnterprisesEnquire before purchasing this report -https://www.researchreportsworld.com/enquiry/pre-order-enquiry/20718864
What is the Network Troubleshooting Software market Share?
Network Troubleshooting Software Market Shareby Company Type Report is designed to incorporate both qualify qualitative and quantitative aspects of the industry with respect to each of the regions and countries involved in the study. This report also provides a balanced and detailed analysis of the on-going Network Troubleshooting Software trends, opportunities/high growth areas, Network Troubleshooting Software market drivers which would help the investors to device and align their market strategies according to the current and future market dynamics.
The Global Network Troubleshooting Software Market Share report is provided for the international markets as well as development trends, competitive landscape analysis, and key regions development status. Development policies and plans are discussed as well as manufacturing processes and cost structures are also analyzed. This report additionally states import/export consumption, supply and demand Figures, cost, price, revenue, and gross margins.
Which region has the largest share in Global Network Troubleshooting Software Market?
Regional Outlook
This section of the report provides key insights regarding various regions and the key players operating in each region. Economic, social, environmental, technological, and political factors have been taken into consideration while assessing the growth of the particular region/country. The readers will also get their hands on the revenue and sales data of each region and country for the period 2017-2029.
The market has been segmented into various major geographies, including North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, South America, Middle East and Africa. Detailed analysis of major countries such as the USA, Germany, the U.K., Italy, France, China, Japan, South Korea, Southeast Asia, and India will be covered within the regional segment. For market estimates, data are going to be provided for 2023 because of the base year, with estimates for 2023 and forecast revenue for 2029.
This Report lets you identify the opportunities in Network Troubleshooting Software Market by means of a region:
● North America ● Europe ● Asia-Pacific ● South America ● The Middle East and AfricaCOVID-19 and Russia-Ukraine War Influence Analysis
The readers in the section will understand how the Network Troubleshooting Software market scenario changed across the globe during the pandemic, post-pandemic and Russia-Ukraine War. The study is done keeping in view the changes in aspects such as demand, consumption, transportation, consumer behavior, supply chain management, export and import, and production. The industry experts have also highlighted the key factors that will help create opportunities for players and stabilize the overall industry in the years to come.
Reasons to Purchase this Report:
● Strong qualitative and quantitative market analysis based on the segment breakdown within the consideration of both economic as well as non-economic factors. ● Market evaluation based on market value (Data in USD Billion) for each segment breakdown. ● Indicates of the region and segment breakdown that is expected to witness the fastest growth rate and acts as market dominant. ● Analysis of geography highlighting, the region vice consumption of the product/service and an indication of the factors that are affecting the market within each region. ● The competitive landscape encompasses the market ranking of the major market competitors, new service/product launches, partnerships, business expansions, and acquisitions in the past five years of companies profiled. ● The company profiles section provides an understanding of the company overview, company insights, product benchmarking, and SWOT analysis for the major market players. ● Current as well as the future market outlook of the industry with respect to recent developments (which involve growth opportunities and drivers as well as challenges and restraints of both emerging as well as developed regions). ● In-depth analysis of the market through Porter’s Five Forces Analysis. ● Provides insight into the market through Value Chain. ● The understanding of market dynamics scenario, growth opportunities of the market for the period of forecast. ● 6-month post-sales analyst support.Key questions answered in the report:
● What is the growth potential of the Network Troubleshooting Software market? ● Which product segment will take the lion’s share? ● Which regional market will emerge as a pioneer in the years to come? ● Which application segment will experience strong growth? ● What growth opportunities might arise in the Network Troubleshooting Software industry in the years to come? ● What are the most significant challenges that the Network Troubleshooting Software market could face in the future? ● Who are the leading companies on the Network Troubleshooting Software market? ● What are the main trends that are positively impacting the growth of the market? ● What growth strategies are the players considering to stay in the Network Troubleshooting Software market?Detailed Table of Content of Global Network Troubleshooting Software Market Research Report 2023
1 Network Troubleshooting Software Market Overview
1.1 Product Overview and Scope of Network Troubleshooting Software
1.2 Network Troubleshooting Software Segment by Type
1.3 Network Troubleshooting Software Segment by Application
1.4 Global Network Troubleshooting Software Market Size Estimates and Forecasts
2 Network Troubleshooting Software Market Competition by Manufacturers
2.1 Global Network Troubleshooting Software Market Share by Manufacturers (2017-2023)
2.2 Global Network Troubleshooting Software Revenue Market Share by Manufacturers (2017-2023)
2.3 Global Network Troubleshooting Software Average Price by Manufacturers (2017-2023)
2.4 Manufacturers Network Troubleshooting Software Manufacturing Sites, Area Served, Product Type
2.5 Network Troubleshooting Software Market Competitive Situation and Trends
2.6 Manufacturers Mergers and Acquisitions, Expansion Plans
3 Network Troubleshooting Software Retrospective Market Scenario by Region
3.1 Global Network Troubleshooting Software Retrospective Market Scenario in Sales by Region: 2017-2023
3.2 Global Network Troubleshooting Software Retrospective Market Scenario in Revenue by Region: 2017-2023
3.3 North America Network Troubleshooting Software Market Facts and Figures by Country
3.4 Europe Network Troubleshooting Software Market Facts and Figures by Country
3.5 Asia Pacific Network Troubleshooting Software Market Facts and Figures by Region
4 Global Network Troubleshooting Software Historic Market Analysis by Type
4.1 Global Network Troubleshooting Software Market Share by Type (2017-2023)
4.2 Global Network Troubleshooting Software Revenue Market Share by Type (2017-2023)
4.3 Global Network Troubleshooting Software Price by Type (2017-2023)
5 Global Network Troubleshooting Software Historic Market Analysis by Application
5.1 Global Network Troubleshooting Software Market Share by Application (2017-2023)
5.2 Global Network Troubleshooting Software Revenue Market Share by Application (2017-2023)
5.3 Global Network Troubleshooting Software Price by Application (2017-2023)
6 Key Companies Profiled
Get a sample PDF of the Network Troubleshooting Software Market Report
7 Network Troubleshooting Software Manufacturing Cost Analysis
7.1 Network Troubleshooting Software Key Raw Materials Analysis
7.2 Proportion of Manufacturing Cost Structure
7.3 Manufacturing Process Analysis of Network Troubleshooting Software
7.4 Network Troubleshooting Software Industrial Chain Analysis
8 Marketing Channel, Distributors and Customers
8.1 Marketing Channel
8.2 Network Troubleshooting Software Distributors List
8.3 Network Troubleshooting Software Customers
9 Network Troubleshooting Software Market Dynamics
9.1 Network Troubleshooting Software Industry Trends
9.2 Network Troubleshooting Software Market Drivers
9.3 Network Troubleshooting Software Market Challenges
9.4 Network Troubleshooting Software Market Restraints
10 Global Market Forecast
10.1 Network Troubleshooting Software Market Estimates and Projections by Type
10.2 Network Troubleshooting Software Market Estimates and Projections by Application
10.3 Network Troubleshooting Software Market Estimates and Projections by Region
11 Research Finding and Conclusion
12 Methodology and Data Source
12.1 Methodology/Research Approach
12.2 Data Source
12.3 Author List
12.4 Disclaimer
Purchase this report (Price 2980 USD for a single-user license) -https://www.researchreportsworld.com/purchase/20718864
About Us:
Research Reports Worldis the credible source for gaining the market reports that will provide you with the lead your business needs. At Research Reports World, our objective is providing a platform for many top-notch market research firms worldwide to publish their research reports, as well as helping the decision makers in finding most suitable market research solutions under one roof. Our aim is to provide the best solution that matches the exact customer requirements. This drives us to provide you with custom or syndicated research reports.
Contact Us:
Research Reports World
Phone:
US(+1) 424 253 0807
UK(+44) 203 239 8187
Email:sales@researchreportsworld.com
Website:https://www.researchreportsworld.com/
Top Trending Reports:
The Future of Pressure Ulcer Detection Devices Market (2023-2027)-Worldwide Insights and Predictions
The Future of Pressure Ulcer Detection Devices Market (2023-2027)-Worldwide Insights and Predictions
2023, Robotic Vision Systems Market Latest Research Report by 2029
Global Software Containers Market (2023-2029)-Opportunities for Growth and Expansion
3D Mapping And 3D Modeling Software Market Size 2023 Will Touch New Level in Upcoming Year
Press Release Distributed by The Express Wire
To view the original version on The Express Wire visit Network Troubleshooting Software Market Share Analysis, Environment Development Trend In 2023
COMTEX_424446475/2598/2023-02-13T23:59:02
Is there a problem with this press release? Contact the source provider Comtex at editorial@comtex.com. You can also contact MarketWatch Customer Service via our Customer Center.
The MarketWatch News Department was not involved in the creation of this content.
Children as young as 4 years old show evidence of a network in the brain found in adults that tackles difficult cognitive problems, a new study found.
The multiple demand network helps people focus their attention, juggle several things in memory at the same time, and solve difficult problems like those involving math.
And while this network is not fully developed in kids, the study showed it operated similarly as it does in adults, said Zeynep Saygin, senior author of the study and assistant professor of psychology at The Ohio State University.
The study involved adults and 4- to 12-year-old children whose brains were scanned in an fMRI while they tried to complete a difficult task.
"We found that the multiple demand network was a distinct network even in young children, and was separate from the language network, just as it is in adults," Saygin said.
"That was something that wasn't known for sure. One alternative would have been that it takes time for these separate networks in the brain to differentiate themselves in children, but that's not what we found."
The study was led by Elana Schettini, a graduate student in psychology at Ohio State, and the results were published online recently in the Journal of Neuroscience. Ohio State graduate student Kelly Hiersche was also a co-author.
The results may help identify disruptions in the neurodevelopment of cognitive control among clinical samples, such as children struggling with ADHD, conduct disorder, or brain injuries, which could eventually inform treatment development.
"By identifying typical variability in the relationship between neural activation and performance on task, we can gain a better understanding of what is considered normal vs. abnormal" Schettini said.
The study involved 44 adults 18 to 38 years old and 37 children aged 4 to 12.
While being scanned in the fMRI, study participants were given a relatively difficult task: They were shown a series of grids containing nine to 12 squares, some of which were blue. They were then shown two grids, and they had to choose which one matched the sequence of blue squares they had seen in earlier grids. Children were given easier trials than adults.
The same participants also completed a language task where they listened to meaningful sentences and control conditions. In adults, the language brain network is spatially adjacent to, but separate from, the multiple demand network. But children's language skills are also still developing and so it was unclear whether the multiple demand network also supports this skill as it develops.
Results showed that the same area of the brain -- the multiple demand network, located in the frontal and parietal cortices -- was activated in both children and adults when they completed the challenging task, and not at all activated for the language task.
There were reasons to expect that kids wouldn't have a multiple demand network similar to adults, Saygin said.
"We know that children aren't always good at knowing what to focus on, they are distracted easily, and they don't always do well when presented with difficult problems. So it wasn't a given that they would be using the same multiple demand network that adults use," she said.
"But even in 4-year-olds this network is pretty robust and is very distinct from the language network."
There were some differences from adults. The response magnitude seen in the brain was smaller in children as they tried to solve the task, indicating it takes years for the brain to mature and "ramp up" to adult levels, she said.
But even in children, multiple demand brain activation reflected how hard they tried and how well they performed during the task, regardless of age; individual variability in performance was reflected in the brain activation at all ages.
"The findings give us a better understanding of how high-level cognition emerges in humans and could help us design interventions for when people have issues with cognitive control," Saygin said.
The researchers received support from Ohio State's Center for Cognitive and Behavioral Brain Imaging and the Ohio Supercomputer Center. Saygin was supported by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation and the Chronic Brain Injury Initiative at Ohio State.
Washington [US], February 19 (ANI): In older patients with early breast cancer, radiotherapy does not seem to Excellerate survival rates.
The findings have been published in the New England Journal of Medicine.
The addition of radiotherapy alongside breast-conserving surgery and hormone therapy -- the current standard treatment -- made no difference to the death rates for patients 65 years or older, researchers said.
Radiotherapy was also found to not affect the risk of secondary tumours, known as metastases. It did, however, slightly reduce the risk of the cancer recurring, but the risk is still within the clinically acceptable range.
The 10-year study, one of the first long-term clinical trials in older breast cancer patients, suggests that radiotherapy can be safely excluded when treating over 65s for early stage breast cancer, experts said.
Regardless of age, the standard treatment for early breast cancer is breast-conserving surgery -- sometimes called a lumpectomy - followed by radiotherapy and hormone treatment to reduce the risk of recurrence in the breast.
Patients 65 years and older represent at least 50 per cent of patients with the condition. Despite radiotherapy adding an extra burden to older patients with side effects linked with heart problems and second cancers, there have been very few clinical trials in this age group.
Researchers from University of Edinburgh and the Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, conducted a randomized-clinical trial - called PRIME II - with 1,326 patients to investigate if radiotherapy is necessary in combination with a lumpectomy and hormone therapy.
The patients were 65 years of age or older with so-called 'low risk' breast cancer, which means a tumour no more than 3cm in size, not involving the lymph nodes underneath the armpit and likely to respond to hormone treatment.
All participants were prescribed breast-conserving surgery and at least five years of hormone therapy. Half of the group were randomly selected to have radiotherapy in addition for three to five weeks after surgery.
Patients were assessed at annual clinic visits and with breast scans.
The research team found that in patients treated without radiotherapy the risk of recurrence of cancer in the treated breast after 10 years was 9.5 per cent, while giving radiotherapy reduced the risk to 0.9 per cent. Despite this difference in rates, both are within the accepted range of recurrence according to current clinical guidelines.
There was no difference in overall survival between both groups and most deaths were due to causes other than breast cancer.
The work was supported by the Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish government and the Breast Cancer Institute NHS Endowment Fund, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh.
Professor Ian Kunkler, Professor of Clinical Oncology at the University of Edinburgh, said, "Radiotherapy can place a heavy burden on patients, particularly older ones. Our findings will help clinicians guide older patients on whether this particular aspect of early breast cancer treatment can be omitted in a shared decision-making process, which weighs up all the risks and benefits." (ANI)
About half of adults treated at hospitals for COVID-19 have experienced lingering symptoms, financial difficulties, or physical limitations months after being discharged, according to a study published in JAMA Network Open.
After six months, more than 7 in 10 adults surveyed in the study experienced cardiopulmonary problems, such as coughing, rapid or irregular heartbeat, and breathlessness, while about half had fatigue or physical limitations—all symptoms associated with long COVID. Additionally, more than half of the adults said they faced financial challenges.
The findings came from the PETAL Network's Biology and Longitudinal Epidemiology: COVID-19 Observational (BLUE CORAL) study.
"My clinic patients often want to know how soon they'll get back to their usual health," said Andrew J. Admon, M.D., M.P.H., the study's first author, a pulmonologist at LTC Charles S. Kettles VA Medical Center, and an assistant professor in the departments of internal medicine and epidemiology at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. "Based on these data, it seems that many people hospitalized for COVID-19 should expect symptoms to last for up to six months or even longer."
To conduct the analysis, researchers assessed data from the medical records and follow-up surveys of 825 adults who received treatment for COVID at one of 44 medical centers in the United States between August 2020 and July 2021. Patients were surveyed one, three, and six months after leaving the hospital for general or intensive care treatment.
The researchers found that six months after being hospitalized:
- Three-fourths of patients, 75%, had at least one cardiopulmonary problem, such as cough or chest problems; swelling in their legs, ankles, and feet; or a need for home oxygen support. This represented an increase from the first month, when 67% of patients reported experiencing problems like these.
- More than half of patients, 51%, felt fatigued compared to 41% who did so after one month. Almost one in five adults, 18%, felt tired every day.
- More than half of patients, 56%, experienced a financial difficulty such as being unable to pay bills, compared to 66% who had problems after one month. Hispanic and Black participants, as well as participants who reported financial difficulty at one month, were more likely to have experienced financial challenges during the sixth month.
- Some 47% of patients reported limitations doing everyday activities, such as eating, preparing meals, bathing, getting dressed, or walking across a room, which represented an improvement compared to the first month, when 55% of patients experienced such limitations.
- Symptoms came and went for some patients, creating intervals of recovery. For instance, some adults were free of symptoms after one month but developed symptoms such as heart and chest problems later.
"These findings will inform programs designed to help adults recover from severe cases of COVID and guide how physicians should check in with patients in the year following hospitalization," said James P. Kiley, Ph.D., the director of NHLBI's Division of Lung Diseases. "They may also help shape future clinical research studies."
For a bigger picture, other studies, such as the Household Pulse Survey, have suggested that half of U.S. adults have reported having COVID. International data suggest that about 1 in 13 adults, 6-7%, who have had symptomatic COVID infections still experienced symptoms months later. Based on research published in October 2022 in JAMA, symptoms lasted for about four months for those who recovered outside of the hospital compared to nine months for those who received hospital care.
More information: Andrew J. Admon et al, Assessment of Symptom, Disability, and Financial Trajectories in Patients Hospitalized for COVID-19 at 6 Months, JAMA Network Open (2023). DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.55795
To learn about NIH research activities to prevent and treat long COVID, visit Researching COVID to Enhance Recovery (RECOVER) or ClinicalTrials.gov.
Citation: Lingering symptoms are common after COVID hospitalization (2023, February 14) retrieved 19 February 2023 from https://medicalxpress.com/news/2023-02-lingering-symptoms-common-covid-hospitalization.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
Q: My desktop computer has made up a name for the wireless network to which it is connected. It says it is connected to “Network 5.” The real network names are “Colton4g” and “Colton5g.” I am not sure when this happened. Recently I had the computer in the shop to connect a Bit Locker error/problem. When I got it back, it would not connect wireless to my network. I assume that was because it was looking for “Network 5,” which does not exist. I had to make a cable connection to get onto the Internet. I need to get the computer to look for the real networks.
— George C.
Shalimar, Florida
A: I’ve had this exact same thing happen to me, George. And on a fully-updated Windows 11 machine, so it’s not an issue that’s endemic to older versions of Windows. It is, however, one of those things that make me pause and ask, “What in the world were you thinking, Microsoft?” Anyone who has read this column for any amount of time might also recognize this as the type of issue that makes me say, “Thanks, Bill!” Let’s discuss.
First, let me say that, as I tried to come up with a cogent answer to this question, I kept discovering that some things that used to work on Windows 7 don’t necessarily work on Windows 10, and same between Win 10 and Win 11. That made it difficult to come up with an answer that works for everybody, so if things look different on your PC than described here, I apologize.
Now, when you hover your mouse over the network tray icon, you get a pop-up message that contains the name that Windows has given to your connection. If it’s a wireless connection, it is usually (but not necessarily) the name of the Service Set Identifier, or SSID, of the network, while on wired networks it can be as terse as “Network” or as verbose as “Wired Network Connection” or “Local Area Connection.” This underlying name is far more important on a wireless network than wired, because with a wired network the network adapter can simply connect to whatever it is plugged into, whereas a wireless adapter gets a list of available SSIDs, and needs to know which one to connect to, and, further, needs security information to allow the connection. If your computer is attempting to connect to something with a number after it, and that’s not the name of the connection, I can see where it might fail.
As far as I’ve been able to figure out, the cause of this is that Windows has a somewhat annoying tendency to append a number to the end of a connection name if it detects any changes to the network. For example, just for the sake of argument, let’s just say your connection is named “Network.” If you change the type of security encryption used on this network, and then reconnect, you’ll find that the adapter is now named “Network 2.” When this happens, the old name is left behind and, looking at a list of available adapters, it might look like you have multiples, even though in reality they are all the same physical piece of hardware. This is Windows storing various network profiles, but, annoyingly enough, not giving you any method to view — much less remove — redundant ones. Did I mention, “Thanks, Bill!”?
In your case, George, getting reconnected should be a simple matter of, well, connecting — to the correct SSID. Follow these steps: Left-click on the network tray icon. Depending on the version of Windows you’re running, you will either get a list of available networks, or Windows will treat the network, volume and battery icons as a group and bring up a composite dialog, in which case you can find network data along the top row. Click the right arrow and you'll get the above-mentioned list. Find the offending SSID, and right-click it. Make sure you click the name, and not any links or buttons that are visible. From the context menu, select “Forget.” If you are connected to it, or your computer is trying to connect to it, you’ll be disconnected. Now, find the SSID that you want in the list and highlight it. Make sure the box labeled “Connect Automatically” is checked, then click “Connect.” You should be reconnected to your home SSID this time, and every time you reboot. Good luck!
This article originally appeared on Northwest Florida Daily News: Network problems have a simple solution
The findings came from the PETAL Network's Biology and Longitudinal Epidemiology: COVID-19 Observational (BLUE CORAL) study, which is supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), part of NIH.
To conduct the analysis, researchers assessed data from the medical records and follow-up surveys of 825 adults who received treatment for COVID at one of 44 medical centers in the United States between August 2020 and July 2021. Patients were surveyed one, three, and six months after leaving the hospital for general or intensive care treatment.
Advertisement
The researchers found that six months after being hospitalized:
- Three-fourths of patients, 75%, had at least one cardiopulmonary problem, such as cough or chest problems; swelling in their legs, ankles, and feet; or a need for home oxygen support. This represented an increase from the first month, when 67% of patients reported experiencing problems like these.
- More than half of patients, 51%, felt fatigued compared to 41% who did so after one month. Almost one in five adults, 18%, felt tired every day.
- More than half of patients, 56%, experienced a financial difficulty such as being unable to pay bills, compared to 66% who had problems after one month. Hispanic and black participants, as well as participants who reported financial difficulty at one month, were more likely to have experienced financial challenges during the sixth month.
- Some 47% of patients reported limitations doing everyday activities, such as eating, preparing meals, bathing, getting dressed, or walking across a room, which represented an improvement compared to the first month, when 55% of patients experienced such limitations.
- Symptoms came and went for some patients, creating intervals of recovery. For instance, some adults were free of symptoms after one month but developed symptoms such as heart and chest problems later.
For a bigger picture, other studies, such as the Household Pulse Survey, have suggested that half of U.S. adults have reported having COVID. International data suggest that about 1 in 13 adults, 6-7%, who have had symptomatic COVID infections still experienced symptoms months later. Based on research published in JAMA, symptoms lasted for about four months for those who recovered outside of the hospital, compared to nine months for those who received hospital care.
Source: Eurekalert
The MarketWatch News Department was not involved in the creation of this content.
Feb 14, 2023 (The Expresswire) -- "Final Report will add the analysis of the impact of COVID-19 on "Network Monitoring Tools" industry."
“Network Monitoring Tools Market” Report Insights with 81 + pages of analysis on business strategy taken up byÂemerging industry players, geographical scope, market segments, product landscape and cost structure. It also assists in Network Monitoring Tools market segmentation according to the industryâs latest and upcoming trends to the bottom-most level, topographical markets, and key advancement from both market and technology-aligned perspectives. This Network Monitoring Tools research also entails a detailed analysis of the current applications and comparative analysis with a keen focus on the opportunities and threats and competitive analysis of major companies.
Get a sample PDF of the Report @https://www.industryresearch.biz/enquiry/request-sample/21212987
Highlights of Network Monitoring Toolss market size and growth 2028:
Market Analysis and Insights: Global Network Monitoring Tools Market
AT present usage of Network monitoring Tools is increasing significantly due to abipty of these tools to provide information about problem and information about how to solve it and Excellerate network. These Network monitoring Tools help users to generate log files and performance charts that helps in detaipng system capabipties and allow user to change system settings for optimal set-up. These Network monitoring Tools includes software such as apppcation performance management, web monitoring and packet capturing.
The global Network Monitoring Tools market size is projected to reach USD million by 2028, from USD million in 2021, at a CAGR of during 2022-2028.
Presently, North America is holding the largest market share for Network monitoring Tools market due to high adoption of Network monitoring Tools among enterprises in various industries for improved auto discovery of data, to increase availabipty of servers and apppcations, to determine unresponsive machine and alert user, for faster detection of network outage. In Europe region, the market for Network monitoring Tools is witnessing high growth rate due to the increasing demand for technologies that can allow companies to Excellerate network performance, trend analysis, and network storage, Excellerate working of wireless devices.
With industry-standard accuracy in analysis and high data integrity, the report makes a brilpant attempt to unveil key opportunities available in the global Network Monitoring Tools market to help players in achieving a strong market position. Buyers of the report can access Tested and repable market forecasts, including those for the overall size of the global Network Monitoring Tools market in terms of revenue.
Overall, the report proves to be an effective tool that players can use to gain a competitive edge over their competitors and ensure lasting success in the global Network Monitoring Tools market. All of the findings, data, and information provided in the report are vapdated and revapdated with the help of trustworthy sources. The analysts who have authored the report took a unique and industry-best research and analysis approach for an in-depth study of the global Network Monitoring Tools market.
Global Network Monitoring Tools Scope and Market Size
Network Monitoring Tools market is segmented by players, region (country), by Type and by Apppcation. Players, stakeholders, and other participants in the global Network Monitoring Tools market will be able to gain the upper hand as they use the report as a powerful resource. The segmental analysis focuses on revenue and forecast by Type and by Apppcation for the period 2017-2028.
Get a sample Copy of the Network Monitoring Tools Market Report
Global Network Monitoring Tools Market: Segment Analysis
Network Monitoring Tools Market Size (sales, revenue) forecast by regions and countries from 2023 to 2028 of Network Monitoring Tools industry. The detailed information is based on current trends and historic milestones. This section also provides an analysis of the volume of production about the global market and about each type from 2017 to 2028. This section mentions the volume of production by region from 2017 to 2028. Pricing analysis is included in the report according to each type from the year 2017 to 2028, manufacturer from 2017 to 2023, region from 2017 to 2023, and global price from 2017 to 2028.
What are the Top Manufacturers of Network Monitoring Tools Market in 2023?
● Riverbed ● Zenoss ● Nagios ● Monitis ● Zoho ● MonitortoolsThe Network Monitoring Tools market segmented by Types:
● Application Performance Management ● Web Monitoring ● Protocol Analyzing ● Packet Capturing ● OthersThe Network Monitoring Tools market segmented by Applications:
● Large Enterprises ● Small and Medium EnterprisesGet a sample Copy of the Network Monitoring Tools Market Report
What are the Key Data Covered in this Network Monitoring Tools Market Report?
● CAGR of the market during the forecast period ● Detailed information on factors that will drive the growth of the Network Monitoring Tools market between 2023 and 2028 ● Precise estimation of the Network Monitoring Tools market size and its contribution to the parent market ● Growth of the industry across APAC, Europe, North America, South America, and Middle East and Africa ● Comprehensive analysis of factors that will challenge the growth of Network Monitoring Tools market vendors ● Accurate predictions about upcoming trends and changes in consumer behaviour ● A thorough analysis of the market's competitive landscape and detailed information about vendorsRegional Market Outlook
The Network Monitoring Tools market share growth in APAC will be significant during the forecast period. China is the key country for the Network Monitoring Tools market in APAC. Market growth in APAC will be faster than the growth of the market in other regions. The growing population, rising disposable income, and improving economic scenario will drive the growth of the market in the region during the forecast period
COVID 19 Analysis
The COVID-19 outbreak brought the world to a complete standstill, with unforeseen and uncertain effects on people’s lives, communities, livelihoods, and economies. The risks of a worldwide recession, as well as job losses, surged. In this situation, it became imperative to predict the level of uncertainty, for which companies are adopting strategies to maximize returns, despite the market fluctuations.
The financial implications of the lockdown measures have had a profound impact on the Network Monitoring Tools market. Supply chain disruptions have been prevalent, hampering the growth prospects of the Network Monitoring Tools industry.
The study objectives of this report are:
To Understand How Covid-19 Impact Is Covered in This Report @https://www.industryresearch.biz/enquiry/request-covid19/21212987
Key questions answered in the report:
● What will the market growth rate of Network Monitoring Tools market? ● What are the key factors driving the Global Network Monitoring Tools market? ● Who are the key manufacturers in Network Monitoring Tools market space? ● What are the market opportunities, market risk and market overview of the Network Monitoring Tools market? ● What are sales, revenue, and price analysis of top manufacturers of Network Monitoring Tools market? ● Who are the distributors, traders and dealers of Network Monitoring Tools market? ● What are the Network Monitoring Tools market opportunities and threats faced by the vendors in the Global Network Monitoring Tools industries? ● What are sales, revenue, and price analysis by types and applications of Network Monitoring Tools market? ● What are sales, revenue, and price analysis by regions of Network Monitoring Tools industries?Key Benefits
● Major countries in each region are mapped according to individual market revenue. ● Comprehensive analysis of factors that drive and restrict the market growth is provided. ● The report includes an in-depth analysis of current research and clinical developments within the market. ● Key players and their key developments in the recent years are listed.And More..
Reasons to Buy this Report: -
● This Network Monitoring Tools report will help the compendiums to understand the competition within the diligence and strategies for the competitive terrain to enhance the implicit profit. ● This report will help stakeholders to understand the global assiduity status and trends of Network Monitoring Tools and provides them with information on crucial request motorists, conditions, challenges, and openings. ● This report will help stakeholders to understand challengers better and gain further perceptivity to strengthen their position in their businesses. ● The competitive geography section includes the request share and rank (in volume and value), contender ecosystem, new product development, expansion, and accession. ● This report stays streamlined with new technology integration, features, and the rearmost developments in the request ● This report helps stakeholders to understand the COVID-19 and Russia-Ukraine War Influence on the Network Monitoring Tools assiduity. ● This report helps stakeholders to gain perceptivity into which regions to target encyclopedically ● This report helps stakeholders to gain perceptivity into the end- stoner perception concerning the relinquishment of Network Monitoring Tools. ● This report helps stakeholders to identify some of the crucial players in the request and understand their precious donation.Inquire or Share Your Questions If Any Before the Purchasing This Report @https://www.industryresearch.biz/enquiry/pre-order-enquiry/21212987
TOC of Network Monitoring Tools Market Report:
1 Network Monitoring Tools Market Overview
1.1 Product Overview and Scope of Network Monitoring Tools
1.2 Network Monitoring Tools Segment by Type
1.2.1 Global Network Monitoring Tools Market Size Growth Rate Analysis by Type 2022 VS 2028
1.3 Network Monitoring Tools Segment by Application
1.3.1 Global Network Monitoring Tools Consumption Comparison by Application: 2017 VS 2022 VS 2028
1.4 Global Market Growth Prospects
1.4.1 Global Network Monitoring Tools Revenue Estimates and Forecasts (2017-2028)
1.4.2 Global Network Monitoring Tools Production Capacity Estimates and Forecasts (2017-2028)
1.4.3 Global Network Monitoring Tools Production Estimates and Forecasts (2017-2028)
1.5 Global Network Monitoring Tools Market by Region
1.5.1 Global Network Monitoring Tools Market Size Estimates and Forecasts by Region: 2017 VS 2022 VS 2028
1.5.2 North America Estimates and Forecasts (2017-2028)
1.5.3 Europe Estimates and Forecasts (2017-2028)
1.5.5 China Estimates and Forecasts (2017-2028)
1.5.5 Japan Estimates and Forecasts (2017-2028)
2 Market Competition by Manufacturers
2.1 Global Network Monitoring Tools Production Capacity Market Share by Manufacturers (2017-2022)
2.2 Global Network Monitoring Tools Revenue Market Share by Manufacturers (2017-2022)
2.3 Network Monitoring Tools Market Share by Company Type (Tier 1, Tier 2 and Tier 3)
2.4 Global Network Monitoring Tools Average Price by Manufacturers (2017-2022)
2.5 Manufacturers Network Monitoring Tools Production Sites, Area Served, Product Types
2.6 Market Competitive Situation and Trends
2.6.1 Market Concentration Rate
2.6.2 Global 5 and 10 Largest Network Monitoring Tools Players Market Share by Revenue
2.6.3 Mergers and Acquisitions, Expansion
3 Production and Capacity by Region
3.1 Global Production Capacity of Market Share by Region (2017-2022)
3.2 Global Revenue Market Share by Region (2017-2022)
3.3 Global Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2017-2022)
3.4 North America Network Monitoring Tools Production
3.4.1 North America Network Monitoring Tools Production Growth Rate (2017-2022)
3.4.2 North America Network Monitoring Tools Production Capacity, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2017-2022)
3.5 Europe Network Monitoring Tools Production
3.5.1 Europe Production Growth Rate (2017-2022)
3.5.2 Europe Production Capacity, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2017-2022)
3.6 China Production
3.6.1 China Production Growth Rate (2017-2022)
3.6.2 China Production Capacity, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2017-2022)
3.7 Japan Production
3.7.1 Japan Production Growth Rate (2017-2022)
3.7.2 Japan Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2017-2022)
4 Global Network Monitoring Tools Consumption by Region
4.1 Global Network Monitoring Tools Consumption by Region
4.1.1 Global Consumption by Region
4.1.2 Global Consumption Market Share by Region
4.2 North America
4.2.1 North America Consumption by Country
4.2.2 U.S.
4.2.3 Canada
4.3 Europe
4.3.1 Europe Consumption by Country
4.3.2 Germany
4.3.3 France
4.3.4 U.K.
4.3.5 Italy
4.3.6 Russia
4.4 Asia Pacific
4.4.1 Asia Pacific Consumption by Region
4.4.2 China
4.4.3 Japan
4.4.4 South Korea
4.4.5 Taiwan
4.4.6 Southeast Asia
4.4.7 India
4.4.8 Australia
4.5 Latin America
4.5.1 Latin America Consumption by Country
4.5.2 Mexico
4.5.3 Brazil
Continued…
Purchase this Report (Price 2900 USD for a Single-User License) @https://www.industryresearch.biz/purchase/21212987
About Us:
Market is changing rapidly with the ongoing expansion of the industry. Advancement in technology has provided today’s businesses with multifaceted advantages resulting in daily economic shifts. Thus, it is very important for a company to comprehend the patterns of market movements in order to strategize better. An efficient strategy offers the companies a head start in planning and an edge over the competitors. Industry Research is a credible source for gaining market reports that will provide you with the lead your business needs.
Contact Us:
Industry Research Biz
Phone: US +1 424 253 0807
UK +44 203 239 8187
Email:sales@industryresearch.biz
Web:https://www.industryresearch.biz
For Related Reports:
Latest Survey on "Athletic Socks Market" Size 2023-2028, Updated Report With 124 Pages
Latest Survey on "HVAC Sensors Market" 2023-2028, Updated Report With 104 Pages
Press Release Distributed by The Express Wire
To view the original version on The Express Wire visit Network Monitoring Tools Market 2023 with SWOT Study, include Competative Analysis upto 2028
COMTEX_424477156/2598/2023-02-14T12:32:03
Is there a problem with this press release? Contact the source provider Comtex at editorial@comtex.com. You can also contact MarketWatch Customer Service via our Customer Center.
The MarketWatch News Department was not involved in the creation of this content.
About half of adults treated at hospitals for COVID-19 have experienced lingering symptoms, financial difficulties, or physical limitations months after being discharged, according to a National Institutes of Health-supported study published in JAMA Network Open.
After six months, more than 7 in 10 adults surveyed in the study experienced cardiopulmonary problems, such as coughing, rapid or irregular heartbeat, and breathlessness, while about half had fatigue or physical limitations - all symptoms associated with long COVID. Additionally, more than half of the adults said they faced financial challenges.
The findings came from the PETAL Network's Biology and Longitudinal Epidemiology: COVID-19 Observational (BLUE CORAL) study, which is supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), part of NIH.
My clinic patients often want to know how soon they'll get back to their usual health. Based on these data, it seems that many people hospitalized for COVID-19 should expect symptoms to last for up to six months or even longer."
Andrew J. Admon, M.D., M.P.H., study's first author, a pulmonologist at LTC Charles S. Kettles VA Medical Center, and an assistant professor in the departments of internal medicine and epidemiology at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
To conduct the analysis, researchers assessed data from the medical records and follow-up surveys of 825 adults who received treatment for COVID at one of 44 medical centers in the United States between August 2020 and July 2021. Patients were surveyed one, three, and six months after leaving the hospital for general or intensive care treatment.
The researchers found that six months after being hospitalized:
- Three-fourths of patients, 75%, had at least one cardiopulmonary problem, such as cough or chest problems; swelling in their legs, ankles, and feet; or a need for home oxygen support. This represented an increase from the first month, when 67% of patients reported experiencing problems like these.
- More than half of patients, 51%, felt fatigued compared to 41% who did so after one month. Almost one in five adults, 18%, felt tired every day
- More than half of patients, 56%, experienced a financial difficulty such as being unable to pay bills, compared to 66% who had problems after one month. Hispanic and Black participants, as well as participants who reported financial difficulty at one month, were more likely to have experienced financial challenges during the sixth month.
- Some 47% of patients reported limitations doing everyday activities, such as eating, preparing meals, bathing, getting dressed, or walking across a room, which represented an improvement compared to the first month, when 55% of patients experienced such limitations.
- Symptoms came and went for some patients, creating intervals of recovery. For instance, some adults were free of symptoms after one month but developed symptoms such as heart and chest problems later.
"These findings will inform programs designed to help adults recover from severe cases of COVID and guide how physicians should check in with patients in the year following hospitalization," said James P. Kiley, Ph.D., the director of NHLBI's Division of Lung Diseases. "They may also help shape future clinical research studies."
For a bigger picture, other studies, such as the Household Pulse Survey, have suggested that half of U.S. adults have reported having COVID. International data suggest that about 1 in 13 adults, 6-7%, who have had symptomatic COVID infections still experienced symptoms months later. Based on research published in JAMA, symptoms lasted for about four months for those who recovered outside of the hospital compared to nine months for those who received hospital care.
Source:
Journal reference:
Admon, A.J., et al. (2023) Assessment of symptom, disability, and financial trajectories in patients hospitalized for COVID-19 at 6 months. JAMA Network Open. doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.55795.
"We found that maintaining mild to moderate alcohol consumption as well as reducing alcohol consumption from a heavy to moderate level were associated with a decreased risk of dementia," said first author Dr. Keun Hye Jeon, an assistant professor at CHA Gumi Medical Center, CHA University in Gumi, South Korea, in an email.
But don't rush to the liquor store, experts say.
"This study was well done and is extremely robust with 4 million subjects, but we should be cautious not to over interpret the findings," said Alzheimer's researcher Dr. Richard Isaacson, a preventive neurologist at the Institute for Neurodegenerative Diseases of Florida. He was not involved in the new study.
There are red flags for Alzheimer's as well. For example, if a person has one or two copies of the APOE4 gene variant, which raises your risk of developing the mind-wasting disease, drinking is not a good choice, Isaacson said.
"Alcohol has been shown to be harmful for brain outcomes in people with that risk gene — and about 25% of the US population carries one copy of APOE4," he said.
Sizing up alcohol consumption
The connection between alcohol and health is complicated and unclear, experts say.
The new study examined the medical records of people covered by the Korean National Health Insurance Service (NHIS), which provides a free health exam twice a year to insured South Koreans who are 40 and older. In addition to doing various tests, examiners asked about each person's drinking, smoking and exercise habits.
The study looked at the data collected in 2009 and 2011 and categorized people by their self-reported drinking levels. If a person said they drank less than 15 grams (approximately 0.5 ounces) of alcohol a day, they were considered "mild" drinkers.
In the United States, a standard drink contains 14 grams of alcohol, which is roughly the same as 12 ounces of regular beer, 5 ounces of wine or 1.5 ounces of distilled spirits.
If study participants told doctors they drank 15 to 29.9 grams a day — the equivalent of two standards drinks in the US — the researchers categorized them as "moderate" drinkers. And if people said they drank over 30 grams, or three or more drinks a day, researchers considered them "heavy" drinkers.
Researchers also looked at whether people sustained or changed the amount they drank between 2009 and 2011, Jeon said.
"By measuring alcohol consumption at two time points, we were able to study the relationship between reducing, ceasing, maintaining and increasing alcohol consumption and incident dementia," he said.
The team then compared that data to medical records in 2018 — seven or eight years later — to see if anyone studied had been diagnosed with dementia.
After adjusting for age, sex, smoking, exercise level and other demographic factors, researchers found people who said they drank at a mild level over time — about a drink a day — were 21% less likely to develop dementia than people who never drank.
People who said they continued to drink at moderate level, or about two drinks a day, were 17% less likely to develop dementia, the study found.
"One has to be cautious when interpreting studies using medical records. They can be fraught with challenges in how diseases are coded and studied," Isaacson said. "Any anytime you ask people to recall their behaviors, such as drinking, it leaves room for memory errors."
Dangers of increasing drinking over time
The positive pattern did not continue as drinking increased. People who drank heavily — three or more drinks a day — were 8% more likely to be diagnosed with dementia, the study found.
If heavy drinkers reduced their drinking over time to a moderate level, their risk of being diagnosed with Alzheimer's fell by 12%, and the risk of all-cause dementia fell by 8%.
However, people aren't very good at judging how much alcohol they are drinking, Isaacson said.
"People don't really monitor their pours of wine, for example," Isaacson said. "They may think they are drinking a standard-sized glass of wine, but it's really a glass and a half every time. Drink two of those pours and they've had three glasses of wine. That's no longer mild or moderate consumption."
"If someone downs five drinks on Saturday and Sunday that's 10 drinks a week so that would qualify as a moderate alcohol intake," Isaacson said. "To me, that is not that is not the same as having a glass of wine five days a week with a meal, which slows consumption."
The new study also found that starting to drink at a mild level was associated with a decreased risk of all-cause dementia and Alzheimer's, "which, to our knowledge, has never been reported in previous studies," the authors wrote.
However, "none of the existing health guidelines recommends starting alcohol drinking," Jeon said, adding that since the study was observational, no cause and effect can be determined.
"Our findings regarding a initiation of mild alcohol consumption cannot be directly translated into clinical recommendations, thereby warranting additional studies to confirm these associations further," Jeon said.
"I've never personally suggested someone to start drinking moderate amounts of alcohol if they were abstinent," Isaacson said. "But there's really not a one-size-fits-all approach towards counseling a patient on alcohol consumption."
UNR Extension
Nevada Rural Housing has enlisted the help of University of Nevada, Reno Extension to conduct a two-year study of the rural housing situation in every Nevada county. The study will provide detailed information about the housing challenges and needs in each community, and will help guide the agency’s decisions on how to spend federal relief funds received, as well as other agency funds.
“While it doesn’t take specific data to tell us Nevada has deep, affordable housing challenges, it does take a more analytical approach to help deliver the right solutions that will create lasting impact for generations to come,” said Bill Brewer, Nevada Rural Housing executive director. “Simply building more, or providing more subsidies, isn’t necessarily the answer. There’s no silver bullet. Our housing problems are multi-faceted and layered, which requires a layered approach with many solutions.”
Extension’s Nevada Economic Assessment Project has been commissioned to lead the project, and will be working with a variety of local, state, and federal agencies, as well as conducting other research and analytics, to assess housing conditions. The project will expand upon the program’s work that already provides county, state and federal agencies, and their partners, with baseline data and analyses to better understand trends in each county’s demographic, social, economic, fiscal and environmental characteristics.
UNR Extension will be looking at several factors in regard to the housing situation in rural areas of the state, including household size, percentage of total income spent on housing, senior housing, housing for those with disabilities, and housing for those with low fixed incomes. Research has already begun in Lincoln and Elko counties.
“We are really pleased to be working with Nevada Rural Housing on this,” said Buddy Borden, Extension community economic development specialist, who directs the program with colleague Tom Harris. “It’s so important that Nevada Rural Housing, and everyone they partner with throughout the state, have detailed information to tailor solutions for each unique community. That’s the only way to ensure that we don’t just ‘band-aid’ the issues, and instead address these challenges with long-term solutions.”
The information will be shared with various partners across the state and will be available online. Brewer said they hope to work with the University to use a dashboard-style, interactive tool as the project evolves.
“We’ve commissioned housing studies in the past, and while they’ve been useful, they’ve historically only provided a snapshot in time,” he said. “This project Extension is doing is an upgraded approach, using a template that will make ongoing updates simpler and more readily available — especially as Nevada grows or contracts over time. The data will be shared and used by all of us intending to make a dent in our housing supply and access problem.”
Brewer pointed out that Nevada Rural Housing is considered a local government agency, not a state agency, and thus receives no funding from the state budget, and manages its own budget. The agency has received relief funds and earns other revenues to promote, provide and finance affordable housing opportunities for rural Nevadans. He says the pandemic “shed an enormous light on the housing crisis in Nevada,” resulting in an unprecedented commitment by state and local government to help deliver solutions.
“I think we’re all looking to see how we can make the best housing decisions with a community that will make a lasting impact for the better,” Brewer said. “Partnering with Extension, which has a proven track record in our state, an understanding of housing data collection and analysis, and a presence throughout our rural communities, is a perfect fit for this project.”
