Obtaining admission in graduate school is a difficult undertaking. From composing your personal statement, upgrading your CV and getting letters of reference and transcripts, it might be a lot to worry about and manage. As you read the requirements for enrollment in a master’s degree, the last subject you want to worry about is passing the GRE without any GRE prep resources. What’s so significant about taking the exam anyway?
Let us explain why studying for the GRE not simply another item on your to-do list for college.
It is true that the GRE does not focus on a single field of study, but it does assess your ability to manage time effectively. Your critical thinking acts like the boss of your brain, and the GRE test developers want to measure how effectively that boss works in terms of processing data, solving issues, and analyzing information. Competency on the GRE is predicated on your high attention to detail and arranging the data you are provided with in a manner that allows you to deal with problems quickly.
Preparing for the test from the GRE prep resources ensures you’ll be in the top tier. While it may feel like you’re in the application process alone, passing the GRE is something that everyone needs to do. With the GRE scores of a future class, college admission staff can make sure that accepted candidates are among the best and the brightest, ensuring you get to study and work with the finest of outstanding students.
You will collaborate with your colleagues on projects and tasks in the master’s degrees offered, just as you would in an actual situation. GRE prep resources may help deliver your candidacy a push. A statement of purpose, résumé, letters of reference, and transcripts are all items on your checklist that must be submitted along with your GRE result. If you think that one (or many) of those documents isn’t as good as you would like, your GRE score is a terrific approach to demonstrate to admissions officials that you’ve got other abilities that you can bring to the party. While a high GRE score is not a ensure of acceptance, this could compensate for any other weaknesses.
The GRE helps assess whether you’re suited for a master’s degree. We’ll be honest; graduate-level material is demanding, but that doesn’t imply we don’t need you to perform well. We recognize that although you can be tested in master’s degrees, by passing the GRE, you’ll demonstrate that you can cope with the new content with confidence.
Choosing to join a graduate school is challenging. If you do choose that this year isn’t the best time for you to start a master’s degree, that’s alright. You will be able to utilize your GRE score for up to five years after taking the exam if you take it now.
An official score from the GRE is necessary for graduate school admissions. Simply put, you will not be considered for admission to selective graduate programs if you do not have a high GRE score. You must take the GRE in order to apply to masters’ degrees and other prestigious universities around the country, just as you did to get into your undergrad institution’s degree college.
Effective GRE prep resources will benefit you in many ways and make you more adaptive. By selecting a suitable study environment where you can concentrate without interruption, you will be able to commit your complete effort into earning ideal GRE results.
It is a good idea to take the GRE since it is the only comprehensive admissions test that is recognized by hundreds of graduate institutions worldwide. It’s preferable to adopt a positive perspective on the GRE as a chance for admissions and funding, and a good GRE score may even cover a poor GPA. If you apply the ideas outlined above, your GRE study approaches will be strengthened. With a proper amount of time and work, you may anticipate increases in both your GRE scores and general thinking ability.
The college admissions scene has evolved over time. Institutions have become more adaptable, and both examinations have now been generally recognized throughout the world.
SAT prep or ACT prep, however, does not have to keep you up at night when it gets to final selections. Make sure you know the essentials for all of the tests, assess your personal strengths, and then get to studying! While both exams are meant to gauge what you gained in high school, the SAT is a stronger predictor of abilities you’ll really need to thrive in college and your job.
The SAT is more concerned with how effectively you can apply what you have learned rather than how well you can recollect it. This is why you’ll find ordinary math formulae offered during the SAT exam, but the ACT will want you to extract them from your mind.
Choosing whether to take the SAT or ACT is a choice that must be made as early as possible, not only to allow yourself sufficient time to do SAT prep or ACT prep, but also so you can enroll for an examination date before the college admission deadlines.
It is important to know what to anticipate on test day for the SAT and ACT so you can choose the one that is right for you. If your preferences lean primarily toward scientific knowledge, the ACT may spark your curiosity with its science-specific part. The SAT doesn’t neglect scientific information; rather, it’s interwoven throughout the whole exam. Assessment for the SAT takes place over a 3-hour time frame with an extra 50-minute essay section, which is optional. The ACT is administered in the same length of time as the SAT, but includes an extra 40-minute essay section.
In comparison to the ACT prep, the SAT math test has fewer questions. You also have additional time to finish the SAT math test, which offers you more time to solve each question. In the SAT, the math test is broken up into two sections so that you may take a break (and additional breathing!) in between each section. Take advantage of this! Understanding when you’ll be completing the SAT prep or ACT prep can help you study. After all, you will not run a marathon without ramping up your stamina first, would you? SAT prep or ACT prep for a test is akin to this.
In order to accurately assess your strengths and shortcomings, you will need to become well-versed with the ACT prep or SAT prep whatever you choose. Once you’ve accomplished this, you may begin to concentrate on the courses you’ll have to address prior to the test day. With a given timeframe for each question, you will want to develop the ability to pace yourself appropriately and to guess just when time dictates that you proceed.
Invest the effort ahead to know yourself as a test taker. You will be at a loss no matter which exam you take if you better equip yourself on test day with proper ACT prep or SAT prep. Spending only ten minutes a day practicing mock tests will put you well ahead of where you would be if you did nothing. When it relates to registering last-minute, the SAT affords more versatility. Late registration costs are reimbursed for a fee waiver–eligible candidates.
Choosing between the SAT and ACT should not be the most difficult part of applying to colleges. Both may be used, depending on your specific interests and wants as an individual participant and potential college student. Both are equally valid. Think about things like: Do you know how long each exam will take? How different it is from the others in structure, schedule, and content? With this information, you can select which one is the greatest match for you.
The COVID-19 pandemic may have fundamentally altered many aspects of education. One less appreciated area of focus is on how the college admissions process has been affected. recent books by Jeffrey Selingo on who gets in and why, Ron Lieber on the price you pay, and Colin Diver on the influence of the ranking industry, all provide current overviews of the landscape, economics, psychology, and politics of higher education, at least up to the point when the pandemic entered our lives. However, what is really needed is solid research on how the pandemic might have impacted higher education and the admissions process. For example, whether and why students decide to submit their SAT or ACT scores to colleges when the pandemic pushed colleges to adopt test-optional admissions policies is important to understand.
Fortunately, many different groups have started initiatives to tackle these issues. One group I’m leading is the education working group of the Association for Psychological Science global collaboration on COVID-19, where we recently had an academic rockstar panel discussing the role of psychological science in addressing the case of COVID-19 and the college admissions process. In addition, a special issue from Perspectives on Psychological Science examining graduate school admissions was published along with expert commentary.
Now, a new report by the College Board has just been released which addresses SAT score submission decisions by students and other important ways that the pandemic has impacted the higher education landscape. This report, titled “New evidence on recent changes in college applications, admissions, and enrollments: Focus on the Fall 2021 admissions cycle,” is led by economist and College Board’s vice president of research, Jessica Howell. The report is the first of many that will come from the College Board Admissions Research Consortium, of which I am a member of the interdisciplinary research advisory committee. The purpose of the research consortium is as follows:
“Colleges are eager to understand how the impacts of the pandemic and widespread test optional admissions policies are shaping who is applying to their college, and how these impacts might continue to affect college grades and success in the future. Together with our members, College Board has kicked off the Admissions Research Consortium (ARC), which aims to help colleges do exactly that. ARC is a multiyear, collaborative research initiative with 80 participating colleges and associations, including the Association for Institutional Research (AIR), American Association of Collegiate Registrars and Admissions Officers (AACRAO), National Student Clearinghouse (NSC), and College Board. ARC is also guided by a Research Advisory Committee composed of academic and institutional researchers.”
This new report is focused on students in the high school graduating class of 2021 who would have been applying to college in the fall of 2020 for fall 2021 college entry. In fall 2020, when the pandemic was still in its infancy, many high schools were fully remote, students couldn’t go on campus tours or visit colleges, college guidance might have been missing or disrupted, vaccines were not yet available, and it was unclear if colleges would be open or virtual in the future. On top of all that, colleges’ test optional policies had just been announced. As a result, the changes observed in the fall 2021 application cycle, relative to prior years, capture the combined impact of all these factors on students and colleges.
I had the opportunity to ask Jessica Howell some questions about this new landmark report, which follows. The three main findings from this research brief address general shifts in student and college behavior, whether and how students chose to submit their SAT scores, and whether test-optional policies changed student body diversity. All these courses are addressed by data provided by the colleges and universities included in the consortium study.
How did the students and colleges change their behavior during the pandemic and the first year of widespread test-optional college admissions?
Compared to the fall 2020 application cycle, which largely took place before the COVID-19 pandemic, the colleges in our study received more applications, admitted more students, and increased enrollments in the fall of 2021.
There were some colleges that were test optional before the pandemic, but when COVID forced test centers to close, virtually all colleges had to impose a policy that didn’t penalize students who were unable to take the SAT. With the widespread adoption of these test-optional admissions policies and less certainty around how college admissions processes would work compared to prior years, it is perhaps not surprising that nearly all institutions participating in the study received more applications than the prior year, although application growth under test-optional admissions is documented in some research but not all studies of pre-pandemic test-optional admissions. Institutions experienced a nearly 18% growth in applications that ranged from 10% application growth at selective public four-year institutions to 30% application growth at very selective private four-year institutions.
Many colleges in our study reported greater uncertainty about how many students they admitted would end up enrolling on their campuses, so institutions generally admitted more students (6% growth) for fall 2021 than in the prior year. Students did enroll, often at greater rates than colleges expected, so enrollment at these colleges grew by nearly 8% in the fall of 2021. The very selective private institutions in our trial (with admission rates below 25%) are the exception to these admission and enrollment patterns, admitting 12% fewer applicants than the prior year and, thus, keeping enrollment nearly flat in fall 2021 relative to fall 2020.
How did students navigate the choice about whether or not to submit their SAT or ACT scores on their college application?
Fall 2021 applicants to colleges in our study fall into three categories regarding test submission in a test-optional environment: (1) roughly 50% had an SAT or ACT score and chose to submit it to colleges, (2) nearly 30% had an SAT score that they chose not to submit to colleges, and (3) about 20% did not have an SAT score or had an ACT score that they chose not to submit to colleges.
Among those with a test score and a choice to make about whether or not to share it on their college applications, we find that the biggest driver of the decision is whether their score is high or low relative to typical scores at the college to which they’re applying. Applicants whose scores are relatively high are very likely to submit their scores, while applicants whose scores are relatively low are not very likely to submit their scores. Companion research based on student surveys and focus groups also revealed that relative test scores were central to how students make this decision. Very few other factors appear to influence students’ test score submission decision. We find some evidence that students with lower high school grades are more likely to submit their test scores (presumably to bolster their academic record). Conditional on test scores and high school grades, we find almost no difference in test score submission decisions across students with different demographics like parental education, race/ethnicity, and so on. Differences in score submission patterns by race, parental education, and income documented in previous research are attributable to differences in academic achievement among score submitters and non-submitters. Once you control for test scores and the college to which a student is applying, students with different demographic attributes have nearly the same probability of submitting their test score in a test-optional environment.
Did test-optional change diversity at these colleges?
Prior research on test-optional college admissions finds either no change in racial and socioeconomic diversity or small changes. In our new research, we find that, because the enrollment of all subgroups of students increased between fall 2020 and fall 2021, the proportional representation of student subpopulations—by race and socioeconomic status—changed very little at these institutions. Black, Hispanic, and Native students made up about 25% of college enrollees in the trial before and after the pandemic and test-optional admissions policies were in place. Similarly, students from disadvantaged schools and communities made up the same proportion of college enrollees before and after. So, overall, we don’t find a change in trend to the racial/ethnic representation of students in this first year of near universal test-optional policies. The exception to this pattern is among the very selective private four-year colleges, who saw modest gains (about 3 percentage point growth) in both racial and socioeconomic diversity in fall 2021 relative to the prior year. These enrollment patterns in racial and socioeconomic diversity are consistent with separate analyses based on a near-universal set of U.S. four-year institutions, so these results are generalizable beyond this study sample.
It is important to note that 2021 was not a “normal” time with a handful of colleges changing their policies as in the prior research. In this case, test-optional policies were certainly not the only change that students and colleges were navigating, so we have to attribute the changes we document in this new research to the many pandemic-related disruptions that were also occurring simultaneously (e.g., a global health crisis, a domestic economic crisis, remote learning and learning losses, and mental health challenges) in addition to nearly all U.S. colleges and universities changing to a temporary test-optional policy.
Conclusions and future research
In sum, this first brief demonstrates that Admissions Research Consortium colleges have more/different students enrolled than they’ve historically served, so it will be interesting to see if there are differences in student performance, retention, and longer run outcomes like major choice and degree completion. Jessica Howell lets me know that this is what is up next in the research pipeline, and this consortium is ongoing and will publish more research on student outcomes as the group continues to track fall 2021 enrollees and study the fall 2022 cycle, serving as a dynamic process for both students and institutions, hopefully informing policy decisions in that process with solid evidence.
Regarding how students decide whether they submit their SAT or ACT scores to colleges, one fascinating finding from this report is that it aligns with prior research conducted by Howard Wainer who was also able to look up the scores of students who chose not to submit their scores under a test-optional admissions policy. It affirms that lower-scoring students tend not to submit scores and suggests that we’ll likely see lower college performance among students who didn’t submit their scores than among those who did. However, at this point, whether these findings will replicate the Wainer study is an open empirical question.
Here's decoding the exam preparation strategy of CLAT top rankers
Written by Ramit Sharan
Jul 29, 2022, 06:00 am 2 min read
The Common Law Admission Test (CLAT) is a national-level entrance exam for aspiring law candidates conducted by the Consortium of National Law Universities. Candidates who clear this exam can secure admission to BA LLB, BSc LLB, BCom LLB, BBA LLB, BSW LLB, and LLM programs at premier institutes. Here are some exam preparation strategies that will help you crack the CLAT.
Use credible sources
Stay updated with general knowledge
It is vital for a candidate to be up to date with all that is going on in the world around them. Students must allocate a certain amount of time daily to reading newspapers and use online GK sources like Drishti IAS, GKToday, Affairs Cloud, etc. Attempting general knowledge quizzes and test series from reputed coaching institutes will also help enhance your GK.
Find what suits you best
Decide on joining coaching institute or opting for self-study
Many toppers believe in self-study. However, you must choose what works best for you. Whether it is enrolling in a coaching institute or studying by yourself using books and online material, the decision must be taken after considering the pros and cons. Many institutes also provide CLAT resources that help students learn and revise by themselves. So, pick one way and stick to it.
Maintain a timetable
Start preparing in advance
The amount of time that CLAT toppers take to prepare before the exam varies from person to person. Usually, one or two years is taken by most top rankers to prepare for this competitive exam. Also, following a proper timetable is a must in order to do well. This helps students to study in an organized manner.
Work on weaknesses
Know your strengths and weaknesses
The CLAT has a vast syllabus. It has five sections: English including Comprehension, Current Affairs including General Knowledge, Legal Reasoning, Logical Reasoning, and Quantitative Techniques (Mathematics). Figure out which is your weakest subject and put in extra effort in that area. This will encourage you to have a more confident approach to the diverse exam.
Cement your concepts
Revision and mock tests
You should revise the courses you have already studied on a daily or weekly basis. It is important to allocate time for revision after you have completed the syllabus, too. Use test series and mock papers provided by online platforms/coaching institutes to practice the exam format. This will boost your speed while attempting the paper and also act as another level of revision.
Share this timeline
LOS ANGELES, Aug. 09, 2022 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The American Bar Association is currently considering a proposal that would make standardized testing optional in the law school admissions process. TestMasters, an education company that has helped hundreds of thousands of law school applicants prepare for the LSAT, is contributing to the public debate by publishing a series of articles during the open public comment period, which expires on Sept. 1.
Over the past several decades, the LSAT has been the most important factor in the law school admissions process — and for good reason. Studies have consistently shown that an applicant's LSAT score is by far the single best predictor of first-year law school grades, outperforming the next-best predictor (undergraduate GPA) by more than 40 percent. No other admissions tool is specifically designed to ensure that law schools accept only those applicants who appear capable of satisfactorily completing a program of legal education and ultimately passing the bar.
The LSAT gets its predictive power from the fact that it tests only those skills that are essential to the study of law, as evidenced by a comprehensive 2018 survey in which nearly 500 law professors rated a variety of tasks in terms of their relevance to law school coursework. The tasks rated "highly important" by at least 75 percent of respondents — such as reading critically, identifying key facts, and applying general principles to specific cases — are the same ones test takers must perform in order to achieve a high LSAT score. In other words, the LSAT measures what law professors know is necessary for success in law school.
"The LSAT is not an administrative hurdle or an arbitrary way of ranking candidates," says Robin Singh, founder and CEO of TestMasters. "The reading and reasoning skills it tests are fundamental to practicing law, so the exam provides crucial feedback about whether someone is ready to pursue a legal career. Admitting people to law school before they've developed these skills is setting them up for failure."
Given how valuable the LSAT is for making informed admissions decisions, Singh maintains that the American Bar Association — the national accrediting agency for law schools — is undermining the vital role the test plays. Recently, the ABA weakened Standard 503 of its accreditation rules (which requires that applicants take a valid and reliable admissions test) by allowing schools to accept the GRE as a substitute for the LSAT. The GRE, however, is not a law-school-specific test; rather, it is a general barometer of a student's basic academic competence and was created to help colleges evaluate applicants to various master's degree programs in fields such as archaeology and linguistics.
"A large portion of the GRE is devoted to math, and everyone knows that algebra and geometry aren't relevant to the study of law," says Rachel Sheffield, who serves as the Director of Academic Support at TestMasters and has been teaching both the LSAT and the GRE for nearly twenty years. "The ABA's decision to permit law schools to rely on the GRE is baffling."
The ABA is now advancing a proposal that would eliminate the standardized testing requirement altogether and effectively gut Standard 503. "Adopting the proposed changes to this standard would take us even further down the wrong path," Sheffield says. "Law schools would then have the option to make admissions decisions based primarily on an applicant's undergraduate GPA, which is a far less reliable metric than the LSAT and doesn't allow for a true apples-to-apples comparison between candidates. A 3.7 in communications from one school doesn't mean the same thing as a 3.7 in physics from another."
Determining who gets into law school and who doesn't is a serious matter. In TestMasters' view, abandoning the LSAT — the best tool available for making objective and fully-informed admissions decisions — would keep many qualified candidates out of the legal profession and would lead many other candidates to incur life-changing debt in pursuit of a career for which they are not yet prepared. A law school that chooses to remain ignorant of its applicants' skills isn't making its admissions process fairer or more holistic; it's simply increasing the likelihood that its first-year attrition rates will skyrocket and that its bar passage rates will plummet. Since the ABA is responsible for setting best practices for law schools and the legal profession as a whole, it must require schools to utilize the LSAT as part of the admissions process. Any other course of action makes no sense.
This content was issued through the press release distribution service at Newswire.com.
By Jonathan Stempel
(Reuters) – A Kyiv-born test administrator who admitted to involvement in Operation Varsity Blues, the U.S. college admissions bribery scandal, was spared prison on Tuesday after helping prosecutors build cases against other defendants.
Igor Dvorskiy, 56, was sentenced to one year of supervised release, including three months in home confinement, and ordered to forfeit $149,540, the office of U.S. Attorney Rachael Rollins in Massachusetts said.
The defendant was sentenced by U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani in Boston, after pleading guilty in 2019 to conspiring to commit racketeering.
A lawyer for Dvorskiy declined to comment.
Dvorskiy, a former director of the private Los Angeles high school West Hollywood College Prep, was accused of accepting nearly $200,000 in bribes to help parents inflate their children’s scores on the SAT and ACT college entrance exams.
Prosecutors said Dvorskiy arranged for sham proctors to “correct” the children’s wrong answers.
The parents were represented by William “Rick” Singer, a consultant who admitted to leading the scheme to help their children get into top universities through cheating and bribery. His sentencing is scheduled for Nov. 16.
More than 50 people have been convicted at trial or pleaded guilty over involvement in the scheme, including actresses Felicity Huffman and Lori Loughlin.
In seeking to avoid home confinement for Dvorskiy, the defendant’s lawyers said the father of three college-age children was not motivated by greed or prestige, and quickly accepted responsibility.
They also said Dvorskiy had persevered through a difficult upbringing in the former Soviet Union, including anti-Semitism.
(Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Additional reporting by Nate Raymond in Boston; editing by Grant McCool)
Up to 1,700 more patients from across the UK are being asked to join an Addenbrooke’s led drug trial, to help find ways of protecting those with poor immunity from catching Covid.
Dr Rona Smith, consultant in renal medicine at Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (CUH) and senior research associate at the University of Cambridge is leading the PROTECT-V trial.
So far the trial has been testing the drug Nicolsamide on around 1,400 immunocompromised patients across 40 sites. Now hundreds more patients are needed to test a second drug, Sotrovimab, which has shown promising results for treating Covid in people at high risk of disease progression1.
If proven to be safe and effective, Sotrovimab could be considered as a preventative treatment option for Covid, for patients who are immunocompromised, either due to their disease or the treatment they are receiving for their disease.
This includes patients receiving chemotherapy for cancer treatment, immunosuppressive medications for autoimmune diseases or organ transplants, or patients with immunodeficiency.
These patient are at particularly high risk from Covid and its complications, due to a reduced ability to be able to fight the virus, leading to severe infection and hospital admission. They have also been shown to have poorer responses to vaccines than healthy individuals, and so identifying a drug that provides these vulnerable patients with protection is crucial.
Dr Rona Smith chief investigator for the PROTECT-V trial, said:
“A preventative drug for the most at-risk in our populations could help to reduce hospital admissions, and potentially save many lives each year.”
“The launch of the Sotrovimab arm of PROTECT-V is a very exciting development. Not only does it add a second potential preventative drug to the platform, but also broadens inclusion beyond renal patient populations to any individual who has mounted a sub-optimal response to vaccination; fostering cross-specialty working to strengthen research.”
Dr Davinder Dosanjh, co-lead for the Sotrovimab arm of PROTECT-V and Deputy Clinical Director of Research at University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust (UHB), said:
“At UHB we have one of the largest cohorts of immunocompromised patients in the country who are not able to mount a protective immune response to vaccination, and so we have worked hard with our partners to design a trial which we believe will be of great benefit to them.”
“The trial will help us to understand the immune response to Covid in these individuals who mount sub-optimal vaccines responses, as well as investigating whether Sotrovimab provides a protective effect against infection.”
Hilary Fanning, Director of Research Development and Innovation at UHB, said:
“UHB are delighted to support this trial. This is a great example of NHS hospitals working collaboratively with academic and industry partners to deliver a clinical trial, which has direct and immediate relevance to the patients we care for. As the NHS hospital that has provided care for more patients with Covid than any other, we remain committed to contributing to the discovery of evidence-based treatments, to ensure we provide the best possible care for patients.”
UHB will be one of the key recruiting sites, alongside CUH. The Sotrovimab arm of the trial begins on Monday 8 August, with the first dose of Sotrovimab due to be administered at the Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham. The first dose is due to be administered at CUH on Monday 15 August. There are plans to roll out to at least 20 other centres across the UK in the coming weeks.
Launched in Cambridge in February 2021, PROTECT-V (Prophylaxis for patients at risk of COVID-19 infection) is a platform study funded by GSK, and sponsored by University of Cambridge and Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (CUH). It falls within the CUE-TIP (Covid-19 Understanding and Elimination-Trials Implementation Panel) portfolio, which includes research leading to the understanding and elimination of Covid.
The core PROTECT-V trial infrastructure is supported by grant awards from Kidney Research UK, LifeArc, the NIHR Cambridge BRC and Addenbrooke’s Charitable Trust. The Sotrovimab arm of the PROTECT-V study is funded by GSK.
There is a lot of talk these days about the fact that formal education is no longer needed to succeed these days.
Examples are given by people who study on their own, master everything in online courses or short programs and in practice, make millions on TikTok, Instagram and other social and streaming networks. In fact, formal education is now, on the contrary, needed more than ever. Among so many people who study on their own, an expert with a good educational background, especially a practical background like an MBA, is a huge plus and a very big rarity. Therefore, administrative and executors as they wanted to receive this education, and so they will want to. Therefore, in this article, we want to tell you how to enroll in a good MBA program.
Once upon a time, when applying for an MBA program, it was important to show some cool names. For example, Ivy League school or work in a company with a worldwide reputation. Now such name-dropping is considered unnecessary and not relevant. Of course, there is no need to hide if you studied at a good school or worked in a cool company, but this is far from the most significant thing that the admission committee members will look at. Now the focus is not on the function, but on the person, on his motivation, interests, on his real experience. When writing an essay for an MBA, don’t use such cool names. Focus more on your experience.
When we say pay attention, concentrate, this does not mean that if you get an incredible GMAT conditional score of 740, you will immediately be accepted into the MBA program. But before you start filling out admission letters, writing essays, take the GMAT first, because this is one of the first screening criteria by which you will be assessed. Therefore, it makes sense to invest first in order to pass it well enough and only then do everything else. This also shows that you can’t just take and sign up for an MBA program right off the bat, you need to plan it optimally a year before admission. Then you will have time to prepare all the documents, pass all the tests and although it may still be difficult to enter the program, you will approach this issue without too much stress and with the best possible package of documents prepared.
The mention of community service and volunteering is important, but it does not decide, rather, it should talk about one part of your personality, about some trait, about some of your interest, about what causes you really want to help, and it reveals you as important. But you don’t need to volunteer for several years in all the centers around just to write it into an MBA essay and application. On the contrary, one can very easily overdo it. At a minimum, it may seem that you are insincere, and you simply collect a resume for yourself. Feel free to write about simple hobbies that you do for yourself and not for others. We are all living people, and if your hobby is baking buns or bird watching but not building houses for the homeless, then honestly write so. Now sincerity and integrity are in vogue.
It can be seen that if you apply for such a program, your To Do-list is already filled to the limit. Most MBA students say that they had to change the schedule quite a lot, not only while studying on the program, but even before the start of the program itself. Therefore, we advise you to realistically assess your capabilities, realistically assess the time that you have and, if necessary, delegate writing an admission essay to special services or hire someone to help you with filling out an application for admission to the MBA program. None of us was born and didn’t even train as a professional writer. There are experts working at a reliable cheap essay writing service who do it all the time and help many students all over the world with this part of the assignment. Of course, the most important thing is your personal touch and use any help only as a basis for your own work. No one knows you better than yourself, but in technical questions regarding filling out questionnaires, for example, the help of experienced specialists can be useful so that you can save time on preparing the essay itself.
You will most likely be applying to multiple MBA schools for multiple MBA programs. In general, this is the right choice, because every year they have different criteria, they are looking for people with different experiences, and you never know in advance what kind of experience and what kind of people this particular program lacks. It is important not to apply to too many schools, because then you will not be able to customize your applications in any way, and you may fail everywhere. We advise you to choose a maximum of eight programs and break them into groups of two according to their main characteristics, according to what the programs are aimed at and, accordingly, write at least 4 custom essays and application forms for them. This individual approach will help you get the attention of the members of the application committee. Try to ensure that your essay, even if you meet all the requirements for the presentation of the material and for design, does not look like a template and can attract your attention so that a place in the MBA program is given to you.
We hope this article helps you to properly prepare for applying to the MBA program, keep it for yourself for the future, and if you decide to apply for the program, then start preparing right now, do not waste time.