A month has gone by since the last earnings report for Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE). Shares have lost about 9.7% in that time frame, underperforming the S&P 500.
Will the exact negative trend continue leading up to its next earnings release, or is HP Enterprise due for a breakout? Before we dive into how investors and analysts have reacted as of late, let's take a quick look at the most exact earnings report in order to get a better handle on the important drivers.
Hewlett Packard Enterprise reported third-quarter fiscal 2022 non-GAAP earnings of 48 cents per share, which matched the Zacks Consensus Estimate and was a penny higher than the year-ago quarter’s earnings of 47 cents per share.
Revenues of $7 billion increased 1% from the prior-year quarter and surpassed the consensus mark of $6.97 billion. Annualized revenue run-rate (“ARR”) was up 22% year over year to $858 million.
Hewlett Packard continued to witness increased demand for its products and services during the quarter, primarily driven by the accelerated digital transformation amid the remote working trend. Despite supply-chain constraints and high inflationary pressure, the company witnessed an increase in both earnings and sales growth.
Segment-wise, High-Performance Compute & Artificial Intelligence (“HPC & AI”) revenues increased 12% year over year to $830 million. The company stated that this segment’s market share has expanded 39% at the end of the quarter.
The Compute division’s sales decreased 3% year over year to $3 billion. The division witnessed 210 basis points (bps) operating profit margin expansion to 13.3%, driven by strategic pricing actions that offset inflated input costs.
Revenues in the Intelligent Edge division rose 8% year over year to $941 million during the quarter, primarily driven by strong customer demand. Revenues from both Aruba Services witnessed double-digit growth while Intelligent Edge as-a-Service saw an improvement of over 60%.
Financial Service revenues were down 3% year over year to $817 million. Net portfolio assets dipped 4% to roughly $12.6 billion.
Revenues from the Storage business were down 2% year over year to $1.2 billion, primarily on account of supply chain disruptions in HPE IP solutions.
Corporate Investments & Other revenues stood at $300 million, down 9.6% year over year.
Non-GAAP gross margin of 34.7% remained flat on a year-over-year basis while expanding 50 bps sequentially. The year-over-year increase in gross margin was mainly driven by a strong pricing discipline and a continued mix shift toward higher-margin software-rich offerings.
Hewlett Packard’s non-GAAP operating profit margin increased 70 bps year over year to 10.5% and 120 bps sequentially. The company continued to save from the cost optimization plan and invest in high-growth, margin-rich portfolios in the third quarter of fiscal 2022.
Hewlett Packard ended the fiscal third quarter with $3.76 billion in cash and cash equivalents compared with $3.03 billion at the end of the previous quarter.
During the fiscal third quarter, Hewlett Packard generated $1.3 billion of cash for operational activities and a free cash flow of $587 million. Free cash flow reflected normal seasonality and certain inventory actions undertaken to keep pace with the growing demand of customers.
During the first nine months of fiscal 2022, the company generated $1.56 billion of cash for operational activities and a negative free cash flow of $201 million.
Hewlett Packard returned $353 million to shareholders through share repurchases and dividends in the reported quarter. The company declared a regular cash dividend of 12 cents per share, payable on Oct 7, 2022.
Hewlett Packard revised guidance for fiscal 2022 non-GAAP earnings. The company now predicts the figure in the range of $1.96-$2.04 per share compared with the previously guided range of $1.96-$2.10 per share.
Further, HPE currently anticipates free cash flow in the band of $1.7-$1.9 billion, down from the prior estimated band of $1.8-$2 billion.
For the fourth quarter of fiscal 2022, Hewlett Packard expects non-GAAP earnings between 52 cents and 60 cents per share.
How Have Estimates Been Moving Since Then?
In the past month, investors have witnessed a downward trend in estimates revision.
At this time, HP Enterprise has a poor Growth Score of F, however its Momentum Score is doing a lot better with a B. Charting a somewhat similar path, the stock was allocated a grade of A on the value side, putting it in the top 20% for this investment strategy.
Overall, the stock has an aggregate VGM Score of B. If you aren't focused on one strategy, this score is the one you should be interested in.
Estimates have been broadly trending downward for the stock, and the magnitude of these revisions indicates a downward shift. Notably, HP Enterprise has a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold). We expect an in-line return from the stock in the next few months.
Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can get 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company (HPE) : Free Stock Analysis Report
To read this article on Zacks.com click here.
Zacks Investment Research
The item that you have requested was not found.Possible causes:
If you feel the address you entered is correct you can contact us, mentioning the error message received and the item you were trying to reach.We apologize for any inconvenience. From here, you can:
HP wants you to know its all-in on enterprise virtual reality.
Among the various names vying for a place in the enterprise VR market, HP has arguably been one of the most surprising. The company, traditionally known for its printer and PC products, has become a pillar in the VR hardware landscape in only a few years. In 2017 the company unveiled the HP Z VR Backpack, essentially a VR-ready PC in a backpack form factor targeted at enabling powerful VR experiences with greater freedom of movement. HP followed that up with its first VR headset as part of the Windows Mixed Reality ecosystem.
Now, HP has debuted the HP Reverb, a Windows Mixed Reality headset focused on the enterprise market. The headset offers significant upgrades from the previous model and doubles down on the company's commitment to the commercial VR market.
According to John Ludwig, Global Lead of VR Headsets at HP, “Back in 2017 what was a surprise to us at the time, but in retrospect quite obvious, is that HP has a large commercial enterprise business and those sales people start ringing our phones asking, 'How do we get our hands on that VR backpack and VR headset?' ”
That initial flood of interest led HP to create a division dedicated fully to VR for commercial and enterprise use cases. Where other companies were going strongly after the video game and entertainment markets – largely viewed as the greatest area of opportunity for VR, HP decided it was going to create products aimed at engineers and designers.
Those verticals have ranged from product design and architecture to training and healthcare applications. “Training has been huge for two reasons,” Ludwig told Design News. “One, it saves a lot of cost. You don't have to fly a person in to train by actually working a the physical engine, for example. You can do in VR for the first 30-40 hours and then do the finishing touches in the real world. The other thing is actually the retention rate has been quite impressive for VR-based training. Retention is about five to 10 percent for lectures or reading quiz afterwards. VR is about 80 percent.”
HP's first generation of VR products garnered feedback from customers and communities that the company has used in creating its latest products, including the Reverb. “The simple feedback from the architecture, healthcare, and product design sectors was that they needed more resolution,” Ludwig said. “They need to be able see the details so they can make VR a tool they use more often.
“In training a big issue is actually text illegibility. A lot of training is still on documents, using multiple choice questions and things like that. And so the ability to read text very well or comfortably in current generation VR hurts their ability go from documentation to VR training.”
The other big piece of feedback HP got was in relation to comfort. Even casual VR users are familiar with issues of headset weight and overall comfort, particularly in applications like product design and training that can involve a lot of head movement. The equation is pretty simple, if you make a headset more comfortable, you supply users the ability (and desire) to wear them for longer.
HP's first VR headset wasn't designed solely by the company. The base unit work was provided by Microsoft as part of its larger strategy to maintain a certain standard among the first Windows Mixed Reality headsets to roll out.
But Ludwig said HP knew if it was going to implement the feedback it had been receiving and meet expectations, the Reverb would have to be designed from the ground up.
Indeed the most notable specs for the Reverb come in the way of resolution and comfort. The headset boasts a 114-degree field-of-view with a 2160 x 2160-pixel resolution and a 90Hz refresh rate. Mathematically, that's nearly double the resolution of leading headsets such as the HTC Vive Pro, Oculus Rift, and Samsung Odyssey.
The headset itself weighs about 1.1 pounds. And while it is not a wireless headset (it uses DisplayPort 1.3 and USB 3.0), it does offer inside-out tracking, meaning it doesn't need external sensors (or “lighthouses”) to track the wearer's movement in space.
“We're utilizing the fact that you have two eyes to increase field of view and also boost clarity."
The Reverb comes packaged with wireless controllers (the standard Windows Mixed Reality controllers). However, because Bluetooth connectivity can sometimes be unreliable, HP's engineers have opted to implement a Bluetooth radio directly into the headset to avoid having to rely on the PC's Bluetooth and avoiding possible interference from other Bluetooth devices.
In our hands-on tests with the Reverb this Bluetooth implementation did cause some initial confusion with the Windows 10 setup, but after pairing the controllers directly through the OS rather than through the provided app, we found the controllers response to be very accurate and very low latency – even in gaming applications.
The high resolution is also immediately noticeable, provided you have a PC with the horsepower to handle the Reverb (HP recommends a setup with an Intel Core i7, Nvidia GTX 1080 graphics card, and 16GB of RAM at minimum). Even the Windows Mixed Reality Portal – essentially a virtual house that you can walk through to launch apps – takes on a whole new level of detail and clarity in the Reverb.
The comfort level will also be immediately noticeable to anyone who has tried other Mixed Reality headsets on the market. Thanks to some improved weight balancing and some other design decisions related to the optics, the Reverb offers a level of comfort rivaled only by the HTC Vive Pro, but at roughly half the weight.
In our own tests we logged a record amount of time using the Reverb both in enterprise demos and playing games (we ran the headset through its paces with enterprise demos provided by HP as well as by playing Robo Recall). It's a nice feeling to have to remove a VR headset simply because you're done with a task or actually want to take a break, as opposed to having neck strain or needing to stave off a headache.
The HP Reverb comes in two flavors: a consumer and professional edition. “We're commercially focused, but we also notice when the Venn diagram of consumer wants and commercial wants overlap enough,” Ludwig said. The base specs between the two versions are the same, but with slight differences. For example, the consumer variant comes with a machine washable cloth face mask, whereas the Pro version has a wipeable leather face mask for easier sanitation and use in multiuser environments. The Pro version also has a cord so that it can be connected to the HP Backpack, the latest version of which – the HP VR Backpack G2 – HP released to closely coincide with the release of the Reverb.
Ludwig said for HP's team of engineers the key to really delivering the resolution and visual quality that enterprise users demand is in the optics. “[With the Reverb] we're using LCD panels instead of OLED. HTC, Oculus, and Samsung, for example, all use OLED,” Ludwig explained. “The advantage there is we actually have an RGB subpixel stripe, so for each pixel we have a red, green, and blue subpixel – meaning each pixel can make any color. The result is we have two times the resolution, but we are actually more than twice as sharp.”
The other advantage the Reverb's LCDs offer is greater pixel density. “You can't really have a good panel with bad lenses, otherwise you get a bad experience,” Ludwig said. “Quite frankly the lenses aren't the best in the first generation mixed reality devices. The sweet spot is pretty small, which leads to a lot of moving your face around until the image looks clear. And it gets a little blurry near the edges, which isn't great.”
“The other advantage of our LCD panels is they are are much more pixel dense,” Ludwig added. “We use 2.89-inch panels versus the three-and-a-half-inch panels we find for OLED in the Vive, Samsung, and Oculus. So as we basically the headset ends up being a lot smaller and a lot lighter, which also leads directly to comfort.”
Adding only four degrees to the field of view over competing headsets (114-degrees versus 110) may not seem significant, but the difference is very noticeable in use. Aside from the larger view meaning less neck movement (another plus for comfort) it also lends to an overall improvement in clarity in virtual environments.
Ludwig said HP accomplished this by actually taking advantage of a bit of opticl trickery. “We found something interesting, which is that there tends to be an inverse relationship between your field of view and the clarity of the lens in a lot of cases with this kind of technology. So as you increase field of view the lens gets a little murky.
“So what we did is we moved from a symmetrical lens – where these are just circles with your eye in the very middle – to an asymmetrical lens, where your eyes are actually more inboard on the lenses,” Ludwig said. “They're not the same shape. What this lets us do is we've actually lowered the per eye field of view – so your monocular field of view has been lowered, which boosts the clarity of the lens up a bunch and increases the sweet spot of the optics by about 33 percent.”
The magic here is that the Reverb's lenses take advantage of the fact that humans have two eyes. Having a lower than average field of view in each eye results in a larger field of view with both eyes open. “We're utilizing the fact that you have two eyes to increase field of view and also boost clarity,” Ludwig said.
“We don't want to just throw hardware at companies and tell them to figure it. That would be a classic mistake.”
Moving forward, Ludwig said HP wants to maintain a relationship with its customers and not just become a high-end VR hardware vendor. “What we find in the enterprise space is a lot companies are saying, 'Okay let's have our technologist make something [with VR] and see if it's actually reasonable.'In general they all find yes it is. But they're having difficulty going from that to implementing it company wide because that's a much different problem.”
To address this HP is making a support system available to its customers to help bridge the gap from making VR a nice-to-have into a regular, crucial part of workflows. “We've ramped up this support system alongside our products so that say a company comes to us in future and says, 'We have CAD or architecture files, but we don't know how to make the solution to take those into VR we can work with them to find a solution...We don't want to just throw hardware at companies and tell them to figure it. That would be a classic mistake.”
Chris Wiltz is a Senior Editor at Design News covering emerging technologies including AI, VR/AR, blockchain, and robotics.
This summer (August 27-29), Drive World Conference & Expo launches in Silicon Valley with North America's largest embedded systems event, Embedded Systems Conference (ESC). The inaugural three-day showcase brings together the brightest minds across the automotive electronics and embedded systems industries who are looking to shape the technology of tomorrow.
As VR (virtual reality) looks to transform itself into an increasingly more mobile (aka convenient) experience HP has debuted a novel solution to the wires and tethers associated with VR today – a backpack.
At SIGGRAPH 2017, HP announced the HP Z VR Backpack, a 10-lb, wearable PC with enough horsepower for both experiencing and creating VR content. While it is easy to imagine the entertainment potential of the Z VR, HP has made it clear that it wants its new wearable PC to be catalyst for bringing more robust VR experiences to business and enterprise first and foremost. Safer simulation and training, virtual walkthroughs for architectural design, and better collaboration in virtual environments for product designers, are just a few of the use cases cited by HP.
At its core the Z VR Backpack is a Windows 10 PC with an Intel Core i7 processor, 32 GB of SDRAM, a Nvidia Quadro P5200 GPU, and up to 1 TB of internal storage. It measures in at 13.11 x 9.29 x 2.39 inches and weighs 10.25 lbs according to specs released by HP. The backpack is powered by a 55Whr lithium-ion battery and features two, external portable 74 Whr hot-swappable batteries. The Z VR can also be docked and serve as a desktop PC.
If you've had a chance to try VR for product design you know that the cords and wires can make for a very cumbersome (and potentially unsafe) work experience, particularly with multiple users operating in the same physical space. Without some sort of handy rig overhead to manage the wires and someone to spot you and hold the cords connecting your headset and controllers to the workstation, it only takes a few turns before you end up wrapped in cable clutter.
Placing VR into a backpack form factor goes a long way in addressing the cable clutter issues, but in hands-on demonstrations at SIGGRAPH it feels like comfort is still a big issue. At 10 lbs the backpack itself is not terribly heavy, but it is just heavy enough to be noticeable and one wonders how it will play out with extended use – particularly if adapted to more physically demanding tasks like entertainment (live-action shooting games) or design sessions that require prolonged standing.
The other issue, which to be fair is completely outside of HP's control, is the weight of the headset. The latest version of the HTC Vive weighs in at just over a pound. That may not sound significant but it becomes very noticeable when it's attached to your moving head (also consider a pair of reading glasses only weighs about 30-40 grams). Anyone that has ever worked out will tell you that adding a total of about 11 lbs to your bodyweight can have a significant impact.
But headsets are only promising to get lighter. Kopin, a manufacturer of lightweight displays, recently unveiled a reference design, codenamed Elf VR, that will used patented microdisplay panels to create a VR headset the company estimates will be about 50% lighter than headsets currently available.
The move to untethered VR with internal tracking must also be considered. Oculus and HTC have promised the next generation of their headsets will be wireless and companies including Microsoft and Qualcomm are working with partners to deliver untethered headsets as well. A lightweight, wireless headset that delivers the same fidelity as a tethered headset could make the placement of a workstation entirely irrelevant.
Depending on how long it takes for wireless VR products to roll out wide, HP's backpack could catch on with customers too impatient for untethered solutions. We'll have to wait and see whether the backpack PC becomes a standard or a footnote, but for now it may offer a good intermediary step toward fully free VR.
What do you think of HP's VR Backpack solution? Let us know in the comments.
Chris Wiltz is the Managing Editor of Design News.
The MarketWatch News Department was not involved in the creation of this content.
Oct 17, 2022 (The Expresswire) -- "Final Report will add the analysis of the impact of COVID-19 on this industry."
Global “Document Scanner Market” 2022 research report covers market size, share, emerging trends, and the key players of the industry including company profile, product specifications, production capacity, revenue, price and gross margin. This report also provide the insights on the post COVID-19 impact which will help market players in this field evaluate their business growth. The Document Scanner market report covers market segmentation by geography (North America, Europe, China, Japan, Middle East and Africa, South America, India, South Korea, Southeast Asia and Others).
Get a demo Copy of the report: https://www.absolutereports.com/enquiry/request-sample/18811724
Market Analysis and Insights: Global Document Scanner Market
Considering the influence of COVID-19 on the globalÂDocument ScannerÂmarket, this report analyzed the impact from both global and regional perspectives. From production end to consumption end in regions such as North America, Europe, China, and Japan, the report put emphasis on analysis of market under COVID-19 and corresponding response policy in different regions.
This report also analyzes the strategies for different companies to deal with the impact of COVID-19 in detail to seek a path to recovery.
Under COVID-19 Outbreak, how the Document Scanner Industry will develop is also analyzed in detail in Chapter 1.8 of this report.
Major Players in Document Scanner market are:
● Nippon Uniscan
Document Scanner Market by Types:● Automatic Document Feeder (ADF) Scanner ● Flatbed keyword ● Portable keyword ● Others
Document Scanner Market by Applications:● Small Medium Business ● Large Business Workgroups
To Understand How Covid-19 Impact Is Covered in This Report - https://www.absolutereports.com/enquiry/request-covid19/18811724
Under COVID-19 outbreak globally, this report provides 360 degrees of analysis from supply chain, import and export control to regional government policy and future influence on the industry. Detailed analysis about market status (2015-2020), enterprise competition pattern, advantages and disadvantages of enterprise products, industry development trends (2020-2025), regional industrial layout characteristics and macroeconomic policies, industrial policy has also been included. From raw materials to end users of this industry are analyzed scientifically, the trends of product circulation and sales channel will be presented as well. Considering COVID-19, this report provides comprehensive and in-depth analysis on how the epidemic push this industry transformation and reform.
In Chapter 3.4, the report provides analysis of the reasons behind price fluctuations.
In chapters 5, 6, and 7, the impact of COVID-19 on the different regions in both production and consumption end and SWOT analysis are pointed out.
In Chapters 8, the report presents company's exact development and strategies to deal with the impact of COVID-19.
Geographically, the regional consumption and value analysis by types, applications, and countries are included in the report. Furthermore, it also introduces the major competitive players in these regions.
Inquire or Share Your Questions If Any before the Purchasing This Report - https://www.absolutereports.com/enquiry/pre-order-enquiry/18811724
Major regions covered in the report:● North America ● Europe ● Asia-Pacific ● Latin America ● Middle East and Africa
Overview of Document Scanner Market Report:● Provides study coverage of Document Scanner market by studying objectives like product introduction, market size growth rate by type and application. ● Provides Document Scanner industry executive summary by sales estimates revenue estimates and forecasts. ● Analysis market size of sales, revenue and price by type (historical sale, forecasted sales). ● Analysis market size of sales, revenue and price by application (historical sale, forecasted sales). ● Provides regional analysis Document Scanner Market including North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Latin America and Middle East and Africa. ● Provides company profile including corporation information, overview and related development.
Purchase this Report (Price 3000 USD for a Single-User License) -https://www.absolutereports.com/purchase/18811724
Detailed TOC of Global Document Scanner Market Research Report 1 Market Overview
1 Document Scanner Introduction and Market Overview
1.1 Objectives of the Study
1.2 Overview of Document Scanner
1.3 Market Scope and Market Size Estimation
1.3.1 Market Concentration Ratio and Market Maturity Analysis
1.3.2 Global Revenue and Growth Rate from 2016-2026
1.4 Market Segmentation
1.4.1 Types of Document Scanner
1.4.2 Applications of Document Scanner
1.4.3 Research Regions
1.5 Market Dynamics
1.5.1 Document Scanner Industry Trends
1.5.2 Document Scanner Drivers
1.5.3 Document Scanner Market Challenges
1.5.4 Document Scanner Market Restraints
1.6 Industry News and Policies by Regions
1.6.1 Industry News
1.6.2 Industry Policies
1.7 Mergers and Acquisitions, Expansion Plans
1.8 Industry Development Trends under COVID-19 Outbreak
1.8.1 Global COVID-19 Status Overview
1.8.2 Influence of COVID-19 Outbreak on Document Scanner Industry Development
2 Industry Chain Analysis
2.1 Upstream Raw Material Supply and Demand Analysis
2.1.1 Global Document Scanner Major Upstream Raw Material and Suppliers
2.1.2 Raw Material Source Analysis
2.2 Major Players of Document Scanner
2.2.1 Major Players Manufacturing Base of Document Scanner in 2020
2.2.2 Major Players Market Distribution in 2020
2.3 Document Scanner Manufacturing Cost Structure Analysis
2.3.1 Production Process Analysis
2.3.2 Manufacturing Cost Structure of Document Scanner
2.3.3 Labor Cost of Document Scanner
2.4 Market Channel Analysis of Document Scanner
2.5 Major Down Stream Customers by Application
3 Global Document Scanner Market, by Type
3.1 Global Revenue and Market Share by Type (2016-2021)
3.2 Global Production and Market Share by Type (2016-2021)
3.3 Global Revenue and Growth Rate by Type (2016-2021)
3.4 Global Price Analysis by Type (2016-2021)
3.4.1 Explanation of Different Type Product Price Trends
4 Document Scanner Market, by Application
4.1 Downstream Market Overview
4.2 Global Consumption and Market Share by Application (2016-2021)
4.3 Global Consumption and Growth Rate by Application (2016-2021)
5 Global Document Scanner Consumption, Revenue ($) by Region (2016-2021)
5.1 Global Revenue and Market Share by Region (2016-2021)
5.2 Global Consumption and Market Share by Region (2016-2021)
5.3 Global Consumption, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2016-2021)
5.4 North America Document Scanner Consumption, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2016-2021)
5.4.1 North America Market Under COVID-19
5.4.2 North America SWOT Analysis
5.5 Europe Document Scanner Consumption, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2016-2021)
5.5.1 Europe Market Under COVID-19
5.5.2 Europe SWOT Analysis
5.6 China Document Scanner Consumption, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2016-2021)
5.6.1 China Document Scanner Under COVID-19
5.6.2 China SWOT Analysis
5.7 Japan Document Scanner Consumption, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2016-2021)
5.7.1 Japan Market Under COVID-19
5.7.2 Japan SWOT Analysis
5.8 Middle East and Africa Document Scanner Consumption, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2016-2021)
5.8.1 Middle East and Africa Market Under COVID-19
5.8.2 Middle East and Africa SWOT Analysis
5.9 India Document Scanner Consumption, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2016-2021)
5.9.1 India Market Under COVID-19
5.9.2 India SWOT Analysis
5.10 South America Document Scanner Consumption, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2016-2021)
5.10.1 South America Market Under COVID-19
5.10.2 South America SWOT Analysis
5.11 South Korea Document Scanner Consumption, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2016-2021)
5.11.1 South Korea Market Under COVID-19
5.11.2 South Korea SWOT Analysis
5.12 Southeast Asia Document Scanner Consumption, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2016-2021)
5.12.1 Southeast Asia Market Under COVID-19
5.12.2 Southeast Asia SWOT Analysis
6 Global Document Scanner Production by Top Regions (2016-2021)
6.1 Global Production by Top Regions (2016-2021)
6.2 North America Document Scanner Production and Growth Rate
6.3 Europe Document Scanner Production and Growth Rate
6.4 China Document Scanner Production and Growth Rate
6.5 Japan Document Scanner Production and Growth Rate
6.6 India Document Scanner Production and Growth Rate
7 Global Document Scanner Consumption by Regions (2016-2021)
7.1 Global Consumption by Regions (2016-2021)
7.2 North America Consumption and Growth Rate
7.3 Europe Consumption and Growth Rate
7.4 China Consumption and Growth Rate
7.5 Japan Consumption and Growth Rate
7.6 Middle East and Africa Consumption and Growth Rate
7.7 India Consumption and Growth Rate
7.8 South Document Scanner Consumption and Growth Rate
7.9 South Korea Consumption and Growth Rate
7.10 Southeast Asia Consumption and Growth Rate
8 Competitive Landscape
8.1 Competitive Profile
8.2 Manufacture 1 Market Performance Analysis
8.2.1 Company Profiles
8.2.2 Document Scanner Product Profiles, Application and Specification
8.2.3 Manufacture 1 Sales, Revenue, Price, Gross Margin 2016-2021
8.2.4 Company exact Development
8.2.5 Strategies for Company to Deal with the Impact of COVID-19
8.3 Manufacture 2 Market Performance Analysis
8.3.1 Company Profiles
8.3.2 Document Scanner Product Profiles, Application and Specification
8.3.3 Manufacture 2 Sales, Revenue, Price, Gross Margin 2016-2021
8.3.4 Company exact Development
8.3.5 Strategies for Company to Deal with the Impact of COVID-19
8.4 Manufacture 3 Market Performance Analysis
8.4.1 Company Profiles
8.4.2 Document Scanner Product Profiles, Application and Specification
8.4.3 Manufacture 3 Sales, Revenue, Price, Gross Margin 2016-2021
8.4.4 Company exact Development
8.4.5 Strategies for Company to Deal with the Impact of COVID-19
8.5 Manufacture 4 Market Performance Analysis
8.5.1 Company Profiles
8.5.2 Document Scanner Product Profiles, Application and Specification
8.5.3 Manufacture 4 Sales, Revenue, Price, Gross Margin 2016-2021
8.5.4 Company exact Development
8.5.5 Strategies for Company to Deal with the Impact of COVID-19
9 Global Document Scanner Market Analysis and Forecast by Type and Application
9.1 Global Market Revenue and Volume Forecast, by Type (2021-2026)
9.2 Global Document Scanner Market Revenue and Volume Forecast, by Application (2021-2026)
10 Document Scanner Market Supply and Demand Forecast by Region
10.1 North America Market Supply and Demand Forecast (2021-2026)
10.2 Europe Market Supply and Demand Forecast (2021-2026)
10.3 China Market Supply and Demand Forecast (2021-2026)
10.4 Japan Market Supply and Demand Forecast (2021-2026)
10.5 Middle East and Africa Market Supply and Demand Forecast (2021-2026)
10.6 India Market Supply and Demand Forecast (2021-2026)
10.7 South America Market Supply and Demand Forecast (2021-2026)
10.8 South Korea Market Supply and Demand Forecast (2021-2026)
10.9 Southeast Asia Market Supply and Demand Forecast (2021-2026)
10.10 Explanation of Market Size Trends by Region
10.11 Document Scanner Market Trends Analysis
11 New Project Feasibility Analysis
11.1 Industry Barriers and New Entrants SWOT Analysis
11.2 Analysis and Suggestions on New Project Investment
12 Expert Interview Record
13 Research Finding and Conclusion
14.2 Research Data Source
For Detailed TOC - https://www.absolutereports.com/TOC/18811724#TOC
Phone : US +1 424 253 0807
UK +44 203 239 8187
Email : email@example.com
Web : https://www.absolutereports.com
Our Other Reporta:
Press Release Distributed by The Express Wire
To view the original version on The Express Wire visit Global Document Scanner Market Size and Scope 2022 Study Report by Competitive Profile, Applications, Sales, Revenue and Forecast to 2026
The MarketWatch News Department was not involved in the creation of this content.
The MarketWatch News Department was not involved in the creation of this content.
Oct 07, 2022 (Heraldkeepers) -- The Enterprise NASMarket report provides detailed study of several aspects, including the growth rate, regional scope and latest developments by the primary market players. This report also offers Porter's Five Forces, PESTEL, and market analysis to provide a 360-degree research study on the global market. The report evaluates the important characteristics of the market based on current market scenarios, market demands and business strategies. Also, the research report separates the industry based on the Enterprise NAS Market share, types, applications, growth factor, key players and regions. The final report copy delivers the analysis of novel COVID-19 pandemic on the Enterprise NAS market as well as rise and fall during the forecast period.
Top Companies in the global Enterprise NAS market are
IBM, Aberdeen, Asustor, QNAP, DataDirect Networks, Symantec, Synology, LeCie (Seagate), NetApp, CTERA Networks, Thecus, Quantum, Hitachi Data Systems, Buffalo Technology, Overland Storage, Seagate, HP, Drobo, NETGEAR, AC&NC, Dell, Fujitsu, Cisco Systems, Nfina Technologies, Western Digital, Lenovo, Oracle, EMC, Alibabacloud, and Other.
Click on the link below to get the free demo copy of Enterprise NAS market:
By types market is divided into
By applications market is divided into
The regions focused by the Enterprise NAS Market are:
Asia-Pacific (China, India, Japan, South Korea, Australia, Indonesia, Malaysia, and Others), North America (United States, Canada, and Mexico), Central & South America (Brazil, and Rest of South America), Europe (Germany, France, UK, Italy, Russia, and Rest of Europe), Middle East & Africa (GCC Countries, Turkey, Egypt, South Africa and Other)
Browse full Enterprise NAS market report description with TOC (Flat 25% Discount):
Highlights of the Enterprise NAS market report are
– A comprehensive evaluation of all opportunities and risks in the market.
– Enterprise NAS market current developments and significant occasions.
– A deep study of business techniques for the development of the market-driving players.
– Conclusive study about the improvement plot of the market for approaching years.
– Top to bottom approach of market-express drivers, targets, and major littler scale markets.
Important Features of the reports:
- Potential and niche segments/regions exhibiting promising growth.
- Detailed overview of Market
- Changing market dynamics of the industry
- In-depth market segmentation by Type, Application, etc.
- Historical, current, and projected market size in terms of volume and value
- exact industry trends and developments
- Competitive landscape of Market
- Strategies of key players and product offerings
Note: This report can be further customized according to the client's specific requirements. No additional charges will be added for limited additional research.
Infinity Business Insights is a market research company that offers market and business research intelligence all around the world. We are specialized in offering the services in various industry verticals to recognize their highest-value chance, address their most analytical challenges, and alter their work.
The post Enterprise NAS Market Growing Massively by 2022 to 2028 Major Players – IBM, Aberdeen, Asustor, QNAP appeared first on Herald Keeper.
The MarketWatch News Department was not involved in the creation of this content.