The MarketWatch News Department was not involved in the creation of this content.
Oct 14, 2022 (The Expresswire) -- Global “Multi-Vendor IT Support Services Market” (2022-2028) research report offers insight into the trending demand, size, share, global trends and the future growth of the industry for a length. This report gives a complete analysis of different segments on the basis of type, application, key holders and region. The report outlines the market characteristics and methodology, and market growth Multi-Vendor IT Support Services industry, categorized by type, application, and consumer sector. In addition, it provides a comprehensive analysis of aspects involved in market development before and after the Covid-19 pandemic.
Get a demo PDF of report at - https://www.researchreportsworld.com/enquiry/request-sample/21051174
Market Analysis: Global Multi-Vendor IT Support Services Market
Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the global Multi-Vendor IT Support Services market size is estimated to be worth USD million in 2021 and is forecast to a readjusted size of USD million by 2028 with a CAGR of % during the forecast period 2022-2028. Fully considering the economic change by this health crisis, the Europe Multi-Vendor IT Support Services market is estimated at USD million in 2022, while the United States and China are forecast to reach USD million and USD million by 2028, respectively. The proportion of the United States is % in 2022, while Chinese percentage is %, and it is predicted that China market share will reach in 2028, trailing a CAGR of % through the analysis period. As for the Europe Multi-Vendor IT Support Services landscape, Germany is projected to reach USD million by 2028. and in Asia, the notable markets are Japan and South Korea, CAGR is % and % respectively for the next 6-year period.
Below Grit accounting for % of the Multi-Vendor IT Support Services global market in 2021, is projected to value USD million by 2028, growing at a revised % CAGR from 2022 to 2028. While Concrete segment is altered to an % CAGR throughout this forecast period and will hold a share about % in 2028.
This report focuses on Multi-Vendor IT Support Services volume and value at the global level, regional level, and company level. From a global perspective, this report represents overall Multi-Vendor IT Support Services market size by analyzing historical data and future prospect. Regionally, this report focuses on several key regions: North America, Europe, China and Japan, etc.
The Global Multi-Vendor IT Support Services market is anticipated to rise at a considerable rate during the forecast period, between 2022 and 2028. In 2021, the market is growing at a constant rate and with the rising acquisition of strategies by leading players, the market is expected to rise over the projected horizon.
Final Report will add the analysis of the impact of COVID-19 on this industry.
According to our latest study, due to COVID-19 pandemic, the global Multi-Vendor IT Support Services market size is estimated to be worth in 2021 and is forecast to a readjusted size by 2028 during review period. Online Sales accounting the Multi-Vendor IT Support Services global market in 2021, is projected to value by 2028, growing in next six years. While Multi-Vendor IT Support Services segment is altered between 2022 and 2028.
Moreover, it helps new businesses perform a positive assessment of their business plans because it covers a range of subjects market participants must be aware of to remain competitive.
Report covers Impact of Coronavirus COVID-19: Since the COVID-19 virus outbreak in December 2019, the disease has spread to almost every country around the globe with the World Health Organization declaring it a public health emergency. The global impacts of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are already starting to be felt, and will significantly affect the Multi-Vendor IT Support Services market in 2021. The outbreak of COVID-19 has brought effects on many aspects, like flight cancellations; travel bans and quarantines; restaurants closed; all indoor/outdoor events restricted; over forty countries state of emergency declared; massive slowing of the supply chain; stock market volatility; falling business confidence, growing panic among the population, and uncertainty about future.
To know How COVID-19 Pandemic Will Impact This Market/Industry-Request a demo copy of the report -https://www.researchreportsworld.com/enquiry/request-covid19/21051174
Multi-Vendor IT Support Services Market - Competitive and Segmentation Analysis:
Furthermore, providing an overview of successful top marketing strategies, industry opportunities, contributions, and recent developments of top leading companies, the report also offers a complete overview of leading companies' past and present performance. Several methodologies and analyses are used in the research report to provide in-depth and accurate information about the Multi-Vendor IT Support Services Market
Key Indicators Analyzed● Market Players and Competitor Analysis: The report covers the key players of the industry including Company Profile, Product Specifications, Production Capacity/Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin and Sales by Product Types. ● Global and Regional Market Analysis: The report includes Global and Regional market status and outlook 2022-2028. Further the report provides break down details about each region and countries covered in the report. Identifying its production, consumption, import and export, sales volume and revenue forecast. ● Market Analysis by Product Type: The report covers majority Product Types in the Multi-Vendor IT Support Services Industry, including its product specifications by each key player, volume, sales by Volume and Value (USD). ● Market Analysis by Application Type: Based on the Multi-Vendor IT Support Services Industry and its applications, the market is further sub-segmented into several major Application of its industry. It provides you with the market size, CAGR and forecast by each industry applications. ● Market Trends: Market key trends which include Increased Competition and Continuous Innovations. ● Opportunities and Drivers: Identifying the Growing Demands and New Technology ● Porters Five Force Analysis: The report will provide with the state of competition in industry depending on five basic forces: threat of new entrants, bargaining power of suppliers, bargaining power of buyers, threat of substitute products or services, and existing industry rivalry.
Competitive Landscape and Multi-Vendor IT Support Services Market Share Analysis
The Multi-Vendor IT Support Services market competitive landscape provides details by a competitor. Details included are company overview, company financials, revenue generated, market potential, investment in research and development, new market initiatives, global presence, production sites and facilities, production capacities, company strengths and weaknesses, product launch, product width and breadth, application dominance. The above data points provided are only related to the companies’ focus related to the Multi-Vendor IT Support Services market.
List of TOP KEY PLAYERS in Multi-Vendor IT Support Services Market Report are -
● Park Place
The Multi-Vendor IT Support Services Market is Segmented by Types:
● Hardware Support Services
● Software Support Services
The Multi-Vendor IT Support Services Market is Segmented by Applications:
● Sales and Marketing
● Financial and Accounting
● Supply Chain
● IT Operations
Research Methodology: Global Multi-Vendor IT Support Services Market:
Multi-Vendor IT Support Services collection and base year analysis is done using Multi-Vendor IT Support Services modules with large demo sizes. The market data is analyzed and estimated using Multi-Vendor IT Support Services market statistical and logical models. Also market share analysis and key trend analysis are the major success factors in the market report. The key research methodology used in research team is data split which involves data mining, analysis of the impact of data variables on the market, and primary (industry expert) validation. Apart from this, data models include vendor position grid, time analysis, overview of the industry, Multi-Vendor IT Support Services share and trends analysis.
Multi-Vendor IT Support Services Market Technology Analysis:
In the global coronavirus pandemic, remote working had been introduced as a trend. But with the various virus variants and waves hitting the global locations, remote working has become a necessity to keep up with the trends and maintain a proper flow of the supply chain and production mechanism. With the rising investment in the research and development department and activities, the Multi-Vendor IT Support Services solutions are acting as an efficient resource that goes easy on formatting. To collaborate motivation with efficiency and personal goals with the organizational Multi-Vendor IT Support Services industry objectives, the Multi-Vendor IT Support Services market size is implementing strategies so that there is a feeling of belongingness and recognition integrated with the push and need to come up with comprehensive ideas for the global growth of the market during the forecast period that ends in the year 2028.
Enquire before purchasing this report -https://www.researchreportsworld.com/enquiry/pre-order-enquiry/21051174
Geographically, this report is segmented into several key regions, with sales, revenue, market share and growth Rate of Multi-Vendor IT Support Services in these regions, from 2021 to 2027, covering● North America (United States, Canada and Mexico) ● Europe (Germany, UK, France, Italy, Russia and Turkey etc.) ● Asia-Pacific (China, Japan, Korea, India, Australia, Indonesia, Thailand, Philippines, Malaysia and Vietnam) ● South America (Brazil, Argentina, Columbia etc.) ● Middle East and Africa (Saudi Arabia, UAE, Egypt, Nigeria and South Africa)
Global Multi-Vendor IT Support Services Market Regional Analysis
Geographically, the global Multi-Vendor IT Support Services Market is segmented into North America, Europe, South America, Europe, Asia Pacific and the Middle East and Africa. Research has a leading market share of in 2019. The market volume of Multi-Vendor IT Support Services in Southeast Asia is largely connected to downstream demand.
The objective of the report is to present a comprehensive analysis of the Global Multi-Vendor IT Support Services Market including all the stakeholders of the Multi-Vendor IT Support Services industry. The past and current status of the industry with forecasted market share, size and recent and future trends are presented in the report with the analysis of complicated data in simple language. The report covers all the aspects of the marketing 4.0 industry with a dedicated study of key players that includes industry top leading players, new consumers, shareholders.
However, the potential startups that are still in the development phase are struggling with the trends and changes introduced by the pandemic. Also, low investments and lack of availability of capital are barring them to seek Multi-Vendor IT Support Services solutions and implement them across various verticals for enhanced functioning of different departments and sections. This is likely to present major market restraints during the forecast period that ends in 2028.
Key Reasons to Buy this Report:● Access to date statistics compiled by our researchers. These provide you with historical and forecast data, which is analyzed to tell you why your market is set to change ● This enables you to anticipate Multi-Vendor IT Support Services market changes to remain ahead of your competitors ● You will be able to copy data from the Excel spreadsheet straight into your marketing plans, business presentations, or other strategic documents ● The concise analysis, clear graph, and table format will enable you to pinpoint the information you require quickly ● Provision of Multi-Vendor IT Support Services market value (data) for each segment and sub-segment ● Indicates the region and segment that is expected to witness the fastest growth as well as to dominate the market ● Analysis by geography highlighting the consumption of the product/service in the region as well as indicating the factors that are affecting the market within each region ● Competitive landscape which incorporates the market ranking of the major players, along with new service/product launches, partnerships, business expansions, and acquisitions in the past five years of companies profiled ● Extensive company profiles comprising of company overview, company insights, product benchmarking, and SWOT analysis for the major market players
This Multi-Vendor IT Support Services Market Research/Analysis Report Contains Answers to your following Questions● Which Manufacturing Technology is used for Multi-Vendor IT Support Services? What Developments Are Going On in That Technology? Which Trends Are Causing These Developments? ● Who Are the Global Key Players in This Multi-Vendor IT Support Services Market? What are Their Company Profile, Their Product Information, and Contact Information? ● What Was Global Market Status of Multi-Vendor IT Support Services Market? What Was Capacity, Production Value, Cost and PROFIT of Multi-Vendor IT Support Services Market? ● What Is Current Market Status of Multi-Vendor IT Support Services Industry? What’s Market Competition in This Industry, Both Company, and Country Wise? What’s Market Analysis of Multi-Vendor IT Support Services Market by Taking Applications and Types in Consideration? ● What Are Projections of Global Multi-Vendor IT Support Services Industry Considering Capacity, Production and Production Value? What Will Be the Estimation of Cost and Profit? What Will Be Market Share, Supply and Consumption? What about Import and Export? ● What Is Multi-Vendor IT Support Services Market Chain Analysis by Upstream Raw Materials and Downstream Industry?
An exhaustive and professional study of the global Multi-Vendor IT Support Services market report has been completed by industry professionals and presented in the most particular manner to present only the details that matter the most. The report mainly focuses on the most dynamic information of the global market.
Purchase this report (Price 2900 USD for single user license)-
Major Points from Table of Contents:
1 Multi-Vendor IT Support Services Market Overview
1.1 Multi-Vendor IT Support Services Product Scope
1.2 Multi-Vendor IT Support Services Segment by Type
1.3 Multi-Vendor IT Support Services Segment by Application
1.4 Multi-Vendor IT Support Services Market Estimates and Forecasts (2017-2028)
2 Multi-Vendor IT Support Services Estimates and Forecasts by Region
2.1 Global Multi-Vendor IT Support Services Market Size by Region: 2017 VS 2021 VS 2028
2.2 Global Multi-Vendor IT Support Services Market Scenario by Region (2017-2021)
2.3 Global Market Estimates and Forecasts by Region (2022-2028)
2.4 Geographic Market Analysis: Market Facts and Figures
3 Global Multi-Vendor IT Support Services Competition Landscape by Players
3.1 Global Top Multi-Vendor IT Support Services Players by Sales (2017-2021)
3.2 Global Top Multi-Vendor IT Support Services Players by Revenue (2017-2021)
3.3 Global Multi-Vendor IT Support Services Market Share by Company Type (Tier 1, Tier 2 and Tier 3) and (based on the Revenue in Multi-Vendor IT Support Services as of 2020)
3.4 Global Multi-Vendor IT Support Services Average Price by Company (2017-2021)
3.5 Manufacturers Multi-Vendor IT Support Services Manufacturing Sites, Area Served, Product Type
3.6 Manufacturers Mergers and Acquisitions, Expansion Plans
4 Global Multi-Vendor IT Support Services Market Size by Type
4.1 Global Multi-Vendor IT Support Services Historic Market Review by Type (2017-2021)
4.2 Global Market Estimates and Forecasts by Type (2022-2028)
4.2.3 Global Price Forecast by Type (2022-2028)
5 Global Multi-Vendor IT Support Services Market Size by Application
5.1 Global Multi-Vendor IT Support Services Historic Market Review by Application (2017-2021)
5.2 Global Market Estimates and Forecasts by Application (2022-2028)
6 North America Multi-Vendor IT Support Services Market Facts and Figures
6.1 North America Multi-Vendor IT Support Services by Company
6.2 North America Multi-Vendor IT Support Services Breakdown by Type
6.3 North America Multi-Vendor IT Support Services Breakdown by Application
7 Europe Multi-Vendor IT Support Services Market Facts and Figures
8 China Multi-Vendor IT Support Services Market Facts and Figures
9 Japan Multi-Vendor IT Support Services Market Facts and Figures
10 Southeast Asia Multi-Vendor IT Support Services Market Facts and Figures
11 India Multi-Vendor IT Support Services Market Facts and Figures
12 Company Profiles and Key Figures in Multi-Vendor IT Support Services Business
13 Multi-Vendor IT Support Services Manufacturing Cost Analysis
13.1 Multi-Vendor IT Support Services Key Raw Materials Analysis
13.1.1 Key Raw Materials
13.1.2 Key Raw Materials Price Trend
13.1.3 Key Suppliers of Raw Materials
13.2 Proportion of Manufacturing Cost Structure
13.3 Manufacturing Process Analysis of Multi-Vendor IT Support Services
13.4 Multi-Vendor IT Support Services Industrial Chain Analysis
14 Marketing Channel, Distributors and Customers
14.1 Marketing Channel
14.2 Multi-Vendor IT Support Services Distributors List
14.3 Multi-Vendor IT Support Services Customers
15 Market Dynamics
15.1 Multi-Vendor IT Support Services Market Trends
15.2 Multi-Vendor IT Support Services Drivers
15.3 Multi-Vendor IT Support Services Market Challenges
15.4 Multi-Vendor IT Support Services Market Restraints
Browse complete table of contents at -
Research Reports World is the credible source for gaining the market reports that will provide you with the lead your business needs. At Research Reports World, our objective is providing a platform for many top-notch market research firms worldwide to publish their research reports, as well as helping the decision makers in finding most suitable market research solutions under one roof. Our aim is to provide the best solution that matches the exact customer requirements. This drives us to provide you with custom or syndicated research reports.
Research Reports World
Phone: US (+1) 424 253 0807
UK (+44) 203 239 8187
Other Reports Here:
Press Release Distributed by The Express Wire
To view the original version on The Express Wire visit Multi-Vendor IT Support Services Market Size, Future Trends, 2022 Top Key Players, Growth, Share and Global Analysis by Forecast to 2028
The MarketWatch News Department was not involved in the creation of this content.
HP has put forward a small robot it says can dramatically speed up construction work, by autonomously printing guidelines straight from the blueprints onto the floor. Rugged, roadworthy and extremely accurate, Siteprint is a super-quick layout tool.
The robot replaces the time-consuming manual process of site layout, using a variety of different inks to place precise lines, exact curves and faithful reproductions of complex shapes on all kinds of floors, from porous surfaces like concrete and plywood to terrazzo, vinyl or epoxy.
It doesn't require a perfectly smooth or clean floor – indeed, it can handle a certain degree of surface irregularity and obstacles up to 2 cm (0.8 in) high. It runs built-in obstacle and cliff drop sensors for fully autonomous operation, and will work around barriers even if they're not in the plans.
As well as layout lines, it's capable of printing more or less whatever else you need on the floor too, including text notes. Operators set it up using cloud-based tools for job preparation, fleet management and tracking, and can run it on site with a touch-screen tablet and a tripod-mounted "totalstation."
“The existing manual layout process can be slow and labor intensive,” said Albert Zulps, Director of Emerging Technology at Skanska - a global construction and development company currently using the SitePrint system for two of its US projects. "Despite being done by specialists, there is always the risk of human error, which can result in costly reworks. Layout experts are a scarce resource who add a lot of value in terms of planning and strategy, but often end up dedicating most of their time to manual execution. HP SitePrint lets us do more with less, helping reduce schedules thanks to a much faster layout process, and allowing senior operators to focus on other critical activities like quality control.”
While HP hasn't announced pricing, we assume the printer robot itself will be surprisingly cheap, but the ink's gonna be a killer. Yuk yuk.
Check out Siteprint in the video below.
HP SitePrint Skanska testimonial | HP
HP laptops offer something for you, whether you're a creative looking to edit photos, a gamer in search of aor a student in need of a small, lightweight laptop.
Many of the best HP laptops have features designed for remote or hybrid work such asand microphones, , longer battery life, and the .
Like other PC makers such as Dell, Lenovo, Acer and Asus, HP is in the midst of updating the processors in its laptops and two-in-ones. That means Intel-based models are moving from 11th-gen to 12th-gen CPUs, while AMD Ryzen systems are switching from 5000-series chips to 6000-series. It also means it's generally a good time to look for deals on older models of the best HP laptops. However, we've also seen big performance improvements with the new processors. An updated model might cost a little more but will add to the overall longevity.
Spectre is HP's top consumer laptop line so you're getting the best of the best with this 16-inch two-in-one.
Of course, a premium two-in-one like the Spectre x360 comes at a relatively high price; it starts at around $1,200. The top-end configuration we reviewed was good but not great considering its $2,030 price. This is definitely one we recommend getting with the 12th-gen Intel processors and Intel Arc graphics if you're going to go all-in. Read our HP Spectre x360 16 review.
HP's Victus 16 is a surprisingly robust and powerful gaming laptop that keeps up with the latest games at a more affordable price. Compared to HP's high-end Omen gaming laptop line, the Victus is more of an all-purpose laptop but still configured for gaming with a price starting at less than $1,000. HP offers several configurations with graphics chip options ranging from Nvidia's entry-level GeForce GTX 1650 up to a midrange RTX 3060 or AMD Radeon RX 6500M. We like almost everything about it except for its flimsy display hinge and underwhelming speakers. Read our HP Victus 16 review.
There are plenty of convertible Chromebooks, where the screen flips around to the back of the keyboard so you can use it as a tablet. But Chrome tablets with removable keyboards like the HP Chromebook x2 11 are still a rarity. It offers long battery life and performance that rises (slightly) above the competition. The main downside is that it's expensive; the model we reviewed is $599. However, that price did include both the keyboard cover and USI pen and it's regularly on sale for $200. If you're interested make sure to wait for one of those deals. Read our HP Chromebook x2 11 review.
If you're making a laptop aimed at creatives, it's not enough to just put discrete graphics and a strong processor in a slim body. The extra performance really should be paired with a good screen, and that's what you get with the HP Envy 14. The laptop's 16:10 14-inch 1,920x1,200-pixel display not only gives you more vertical room to work, but is color-calibrated at the factory and covers 100% of the sRGB color gamut. The result: a well-rounded option for creatives looking for on-the-go performance at a reasonable price. This model is due for a refresh, though, so keep an eye out for updated models. Read our HP Envy 14 review.
By Haider Pasha, Sr. Director and Chief Security Officer for Emerging Markets at Palo Alto Networks
Cybersecurity has long been one of the most complex landscapes an organization must navigate; with each new threat or vulnerability, complexity continues to grow. This is especially true for organizations that have traditionally taken a point product approach to their security because implementing new security measures properly and reliably takes time and expertise. Today, as more businesses look to digitize their services, dealing with these cybersecurity challenges is no longer optional.
Every new tool must be installed, tested, and validated, and then people must be trained to leverage them well. On average, organizations are adopting dozens of different products, services, and tools for their cybersecurity. So, finding ways to make implementing cybersecurity smoother, faster, and more efficient has become a key goal for cybersecurity professionals. As businesses plan for a post-pandemic and digitally accelerated era, many CISOs across multiple industries strive for simplicity and focus on reducing their security vendor blueprint as part of their annual KPIs. Implementation, in particular, has always been an important consideration for successful cybersecurity programs because of the time, expense, personnel, and expertise often required not only to implement individual point products but to stitch them together in order to avoid security gaps while also eliminating redundancies. In the event of a serious incident, security operations center (SOC) analysts typically confess to switching between multiple vendor consoles and event types in order to decipher alerts. Organizations and teams need a better approach, so they’re not either continually exposed or overworked from the alerts created by overlap.
Research conducted by Palo Alto Networks with a wide range of its customers, supplemented by additional first-person, one-on-one interviews, highlighted a range of implementation benefits that result from taking a platform approach to cybersecurity architecture. By definition, a platform is the culmination of integrated points, such as integrated threat intelligence using automation and orchestration across a variety of security tools to take action against incidents in real time and as one system. This approach helps ease the procurement, management, and operations of the cybersecurity stack while reducing cyber risk. Deploying multiple products from different vendors typically requires a level of expertise beyond the capabilities of many in-house teams. Rather than “buying” implementation resources from consultants or cybersecurity services companies, organizations are looking for a more integrated approach to solutions implementation. Platforms, such as those provided by Palo Alto Networks, smooth and facilitate implementation while reducing the risk often associated with integrating different products in a seamless manner
Respondents surveyed on the implementation benefits pinpointed five specific areas where a platform approach delivers tangible value:
On average, respondents said that our platforms helped them reduce solution complexity and the number of integration points by 29%, while each of the other four benefits resulted in savings of approximately 23.3%. As organizations evolve their cloud infrastructure, for example, taking a platform approach helps reduce the number of vendors required to secure multiple instances on the cloud, such as containers, serverless systems, and traditional virtual machines. By binding the cloud security tools under one management system, the complexity of deployment as well as the procurement process means that customers are able to scale their cloud infrastructure much faster than before.
This generally translates to cost savings in the form of faster security policy updates, incident management lifecycles, and reduction of alerts. In fact, according to calculations made by Palo Alto Networks related to customers’ actual implementation costs, a typical organization can achieve an annual economic benefit of more than $500,000 by utilizing a cybersecurity platform model for solutions implementation. In customer interviews, those operational and financial benefits of implementation were brought into greater focus.
“Earlier on, we had at least four to six different integration points just for firewalls and endpoint security before we went with Palo Alto,” said one customer. Using Palo Alto Networks platforms, customers are able to standardize and unify security policies and reduce their risk exposure due to the likelihood of reduced human errors.
As a platform-based approach encourages an open consortium of cybersecurity vendors, customers see the value of this ecosystem: “Having one ecosystem really does get a lot of efficiencies with integrations being so seamless.” Yet another client put it succinctly: “People already know how to do troubleshooting.”
Another tangential yet very important implementation benefit to platforms is the ability to overcome the much-discussed cybersecurity skills gap. By consolidating all cybersecurity tools under the same architecture with easy integration and common connectors, organizations alleviate the need for armies of technical staff—each with different certifications and experiences—to integrate new tools as the need occurs.
As organizations look for comprehensive solutions and services to secure the network, cloud, and endpoint and optimize their SOC, our Palo Alto Networks portfolio of platforms allows them best-in-class capabilities along with leading third-party evaluations and efficacy tests, and together, deliver coordinated security enforcement across our customers.
Read the full research study here.
About Haider Pasha:
Haider Pasha is Sr. Director and Chief Security Officer for Emerging Markets at Palo Alto Networks. Over the course of his 20 year IT career, Mr. Pasha has held various certifications, including CCNP, CCSP, CISSP, CCIE (Security) and CEH.
Did you miss a session from MetaBeat 2022? Head over to the on-demand library for all of our featured sessions here.
More industries are incorporating blockchain applications into their business, drawing the attention of threat actors — like the recent Axie attack, for example. As a result, many cybersecurity professionals are now finding they are responsible for securing blockchain systems. Unfortunately, even skilled cybersecurity professionals are ill-equipped to secure blockchain applications because it and other decentralized applications bring different risks and threat vectors that can only be mitigated through tailored controls.
Blockchain technology allows untrusted parties to agree on the state of data and applications securely, but that security certain is quite narrow. This means that many developers and users assume this security broadly applies to applications built on top of the blockchain. When in reality, that’s not the case. Whether it’s due to code mistakes, breaches or scams, both individuals and big corporations have lost significant amounts of money — in fact, scammers stole $14 billion worth of cryptocurrencies in 2021.
Threat actors gravitate toward the easiest targets with the most profit. As we approach a blockchain-reliant future, ensuring that developers and security professionals understand what it takes to secure applications on blockchain is paramount. Threat groups will continue to pivot as security frameworks evolve to better protect traditional assets. A prime example is ransomware groups, which have already adopted blockchain for payment. It is only a matter of time until they pivot their targets to Web3 as well.
In a public blockchain ecosystem, every new technology or application is developed and launched under full view. This brings many challenges, but is particularly painful when developers are also pressured to launch as quickly as possible. Developers used to spend years developing the product and planning for its launch. Now, this long-standing process does not align with our current reality, in which blockchain developers may ideate and launch a product over as little as a single weekend.
Join today’s leading executives at the Low-Code/No-Code Summit virtually on November 9. Register for your free pass today.
Today, many projects in the blockchain space are created by organizations without robust security programs, processes and controls that can withstand advanced threat actors. This leads to teams missing or misclassifying risk factors and gives businesses a false sense of security. Combining fast development and a lack of security talent, attackers are able to find easy targets.
Blockchain spending is expected to reach 19 billion by 2024, so now is the time for organizations to adopt new technology. If implemented correctly, blockchain can offer increased transparency into operations and processes, making it highly sought after. Offerings touted by advocates include the tokenization of money flow, supply chain financing and the cross-border movement of money. However, it may be difficult for businesses to launch applications on the blockchain that ensure security is at the forefront of their technology.
A business that wants to implement new technology or processes needs the tools and team to successfully execute it. For instance, if a finance team is interested in implementing cloud-based software to streamline the payroll process, they hire a strong team with the knowledge and necessary skill set at their disposal to safely realize their goal.
Cloud security tooling and resources are now plentiful in our industry. However, if the same finance team from the example above looks to implement blockchain technology in their company payroll, they will have a harder time finding security and development tools and talent to ensure the product is safe. Adoption of blockchain is far outpacing available expertise. The challenge here is that security can easily become an afterthought if an organization doesn’t have a knowledgeable team dedicated to identify and mitigate threats.
Organizations that adopt blockchain also need a security strategy to operate successfully. This includes finding cybersecurity professionals who are knowledgeable about the space. As many seasoned security professionals look at blockchain as a fad or unnecessary technology at best, this may be increasingly difficult.
It is challenging for traditional security experts to be excited about NFTs and cryptocurrency taking the blockchain community by storm. We are, of course, a risk-averse group in general. This then leads to a shortage of experienced security professionals in blockchain, even when investment is accelerating.
Instead of disregarding blockchain, security professionals can take a middle-of-the-road outlook on the future of the technology. Whether you believe it is the future or not, you can recognize there is a real impact to people and organizations when attacks happen. As for organizations without proper knowledge of blockchain security — you are launching without a safety net.
Ryan Spanier is vice president of innovation at Kudelski Security.
Welcome to the VentureBeat community!
DataDecisionMakers is where experts, including the technical people doing data work, can share data-related insights and innovation.
If you want to read about cutting-edge ideas and up-to-date information, best practices, and the future of data and data tech, join us at DataDecisionMakers.
You might even consider contributing an article of your own!
The MarketWatch News Department was not involved in the creation of this content.
Oct 12, 2022 (The Expresswire) -- "Final Report will add the analysis of the impact of COVID-19 on this industry."
Global “DevOps PlatformMarket”2022 Research report has all the organization profiles for the top players and brands and alongside that the report likewise contains an outline of market definition, orders, Application, and market patterns, and the DevOps Platform market drivers and limitations that are gotten from a notable technique called SWOT investigation. The conjecture time frame 2022-2029 is supposed to be perfect for the DevOps Platform market which will be the face transformer for the Electronics and Semiconductor industry. The clients are expanding step by step which is expanding deals, import, product, income, and CAGR values.
Get a demo PDF of the report at -https://www.researchreportsworld.com/enquiry/request-sample/21236498
Global DevOps Platform Market Analysis
The primary highlights of the report offer important details pertaining to profit estimations, statistics, and applications of this product. Our report covers regional analysis of the domestic markets, key company profiles, value chain analysis, consumption, demand, and growth areas. The report analyzes major market firms, focusing on their innovative developments, product launches, operations, and emerging market players to implement new business growth strategies. The report focuses on growth prospects, restraints, and trends of the global DevOps Platform market analysis. The study provides Porter’s five forces analysis to understand the impact of various factors such as bargaining power of suppliers, competitive intensity of competitors, threat of new entrants, threat of substitutes, and bargaining power of buyers on the global DevOps Platform market outlook.
DevOps Platform uses tracking and customer behavioral analysis to Excellerate corporate operations. Furthermore, when compared to on premise deployment, the deployment paradigm enables the implementation of analytics solutions at a low cost. Executives, data analysts, team leaders, managers, and professionals use business intelligence (BI) tools to collect, analyses, visualize, and report on numerous functions within a company and apply their results to their respective industries.
The report contains different market predictions related to revenue size, production, CAGR, Consumption, gross margin, price, and other substantial factors. While emphasizing the key driving and restraining forces for this market, the report also offers a complete study of the future trends and developments of the market. It also examines the role of the leading market players involved in the industry including their corporate overview, financial summary and SWOT analysis.
List of Top Key Players in DevOps Platform Market Report:The survey describes the qualities of the entire company based on an industry-wide analysis: -● Vmware ● Cisco ● VersionOne ● Spirent Communications plc ● DBmaestro ● CollabNet ● Microsoft ● Saltstack ● HP ● Puppet Labs ● Docker Inc. ● CA Technologies ● XebiaLabs ● Red Hat(Ansible) ● IBM ● Atlassian ● Chef ● Rackspace
Global DevOps Platform Market Growth report serves to be an ideal solution for better understanding of the Market. It is helpful in finding out the size of the Market for specific products. These major players operating in this Market are in strong competition in terms of technology, innovation, product development, and product pricing. The Market study aids in making sales forecasts for its products and thereby, establishing harmonious adjustment between demand and supply of its products.
The report gives a comprehensive investigation of the global DevOps Platform market. The report contains huge data, measurable information focuses, factual reviewing, SWOT analysis, chance assessment, genuine scene, common exploration, and future improvement prospects. The analysis aims to specify market sizes in individual sections and countries in preceding years and forecast the worth in the subsequent years. The report saves valuable time as well as adds credibility to the work that has been done to grow the business.
Enquire before purchasing this report -https://www.researchreportsworld.com/enquiry/pre-order-enquiry/21236498
Global DevOps Platform Market Segmentation Analysis
Global DevOps Platform Market forecast report provides a holistic evaluation of the market. The report offers a comprehensive analysis of key segments, trends, drivers, restraints, competitive landscape, and factors that are playing a substantial role in the market.
Based on Product Type, this report shows the creation, income, cost, piece of the pie, and development pace of each kind, principally split into:● DevOps Ready ● DevOps Enabled ● DevOps Capable
Based on Component, DevOps Platform is a business solution that provides an in-depth analysis of crowd movement at large gathering locations such as airports and train stations, city malls, retail stores, convention centers, stadiums, and other venues. Data from a variety of sources, including closed-circuit television cameras (CCTV), commercial off-the-shelf cameras, and first- and third-party consumer data, is processed using powerful artificial intelligence approaches to present prediction crowd flow models and customer preference patterns.
On the Basis of the End-User/Applications, this report focuses on the status and outlook for major applications production, revenue, price, market share, and growth rate:● IT ● BFSI ● Retail ● Telecom ● Education ● Others
Based on the End Use, the DevOps Platform Market Trend is bifurcated into Aromatic Industries, Automotive, Building and Construction, Paints, Agrochemicals, and others. It is a low-cost solution that outperforms most composite applications in terms of price vs. performance. In the next five years, hydrocarbon resin is expected to remain the second-largest application in the worldwide DevOps Platform Market, owing to increased usage in adhesives, coatings, printing inks, and rubber goods. Also growing construction activities will help this market is growing.
COVID-19 impact on the market
COVID-19 is an infectious disease caused by the novel coronavirus. Largely unknown before this outbreak across the world, COVID-19 has moved from a regional crisis to a global pandemic in just a matter of a few weeks. The World Health Organization (WHO) declared COVID-19 as a pandemic on March 11, 2020.
To know How COVID-19 Pandemic Will Impact This Market/Industry-Request a demo copy of the report-:https://www.researchreportsworld.com/enquiry/request-covid19/21236498
Geographic Segment Covered in the Report:
The DevOps Platform report provides information about the market area, which is further subdivided into sub-regions and countries/regions. In addition to the market share in each country and sub-region, this chapter of this report also contains information on profit opportunities. This chapter of the report mentions the market share and growth rate of each region, country and sub-region during the estimated period.● North America(USA and Canada) ● Europe(UK, Germany, France and the rest of Europe) ● Asia Pacific(China, Japan, India, and the rest of the Asia Pacific region) ● Latin America(Brazil, Mexico, and the rest of Latin America) ● Middle East and Africa(GCC and rest of the Middle East and Africa)
Valuable Points from DevOps Platform Market Research Report 2022-2029:● Significant changes in DevOps Platform Market dynamics. ● Reporting and assessment of recent industry developments. ● A complete background analysis, which includes a valuation of the parental DevOps Platform Market. ● Current, Historical, and projected size of the DevOps Platform Market from the viewpoint of both value and volume. ● DevOps Platform Market segmentation according to Top Regions. ● DevOps Platform Market shares and strategies of key Manufacturers. ● Emerging Specific segments and regional for DevOps Platform Market. ● An objective valuation of the trajectory of the Market. ● Recommendations to Top Companies for reinforcement of their foothold in the market.
Reasons to Buy This Report:● Identification of potential suppliers as well as partnerships in the report. ● Complete understanding of the global DevOps Platform market. ● The global DevOps Platform market research report studies the latest global market trends, up-to-date, and thorough competitive analysis, along with various other key features of the worldwide market. ● The potential future partners, suppliers, or affiliates have also skillfully been trained in the report. ● Plan mergers and acquisitions meritoriously by identifying Top Manufacturers. ● Recognize emerging players with potentially strong product portfolios and create effective counter-strategies to gain a competitive advantage. ● Classify potential new clients or partners in the target demographic. ● Develop tactical initiatives by understanding the focus areas of leading companies.
Purchase this report (Price 3450 USD for a single-user license) -https://www.researchreportsworld.com/purchase/21236498
Detailed TOC of Global DevOps Platform Market Research Report 2022 - Impact of COVID-19 on the Market
1 DevOps Platform Market Overview
1.1 Product Overview and Scope of DevOps Platform Market
1.2 DevOps Platform Market Segment by Type
1.2.1 Global DevOps Platform Market Sales and CAGR (%) Comparison by Type (2017-2029)
1.3 Global DevOps Platform Market Segment by Application
1.3.1 DevOps Platform Market Consumption (Sales) Comparison by Application (2017-2029)
1.4 Global DevOps Platform Market, Region Wise (2017-2029)
1.4.1 Global DevOps Platform Market Size (Revenue) and CAGR (%) Comparison by Region (2017-2029)
1.4.2 United States DevOps Platform Market Status and Prospect (2017-2029)
1.4.3 Europe DevOps Platform Market Status and Prospect (2017-2029)
1.4.4 China DevOps Platform Market Status and Prospect (2017-2029)
1.4.5 Japan DevOps Platform Market Status and Prospect (2017-2029)
1.4.6 India DevOps Platform Market Status and Prospect (2017-2029)
1.4.7 Southeast Asia DevOps Platform Market Status and Prospect (2017-2029)
1.4.8 Latin America DevOps Platform Market Status and Prospect (2017-2029)
1.4.9 Middle East and Africa DevOps Platform Market Status and Prospect (2017-2029)
1.5 Global Market Size (Revenue) of DevOps Platform (2017-2029)
1.5.1 Global DevOps Platform Market Revenue Status and Outlook (2017-2029)
1.5.2 Global DevOps Platform Market Sales Status and Outlook (2017-2029)
1.6 Influence of Regional Conflicts on the DevOps Platform Industry
1.7 Impact of Carbon Neutrality on the DevOps Platform Industry2 DevOps Platform Market Upstream and Downstream Analysis
2.1 DevOps Platform Industrial Chain Analysis
2.2 Key Raw Materials Suppliers and Price Analysis
2.3 Key Raw Materials Supply and Demand Analysis
2.4 Market Concentration Rate of Raw Materials
2.5 Manufacturing Process Analysis
2.6 Manufacturing Cost Structure Analysis
2.6.1 Labor Cost Analysis
2.6.2 Energy Costs Analysis
2.6.3 RandD Costs Analysis
2.7 Major Downstream Buyers of DevOps Platform Analysis
2.8 Impact of COVID-19 on the Industry Upstream and Downstream3 Players Profiles
3.1.1 Vmware Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Competitors
3.1.2 Product Profiles, Application and Specification
3.1.3 DevOps Platform Market Performance (2017-2022)
3.1.4 Business Overview
3.2.1 Cisco Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Competitors
3.2.2 Product Profiles, Application and Specification
3.2.3 DevOps Platform Market Performance (2017-2022)
3.2.4 Business Overview
3.3.1 VersionOne Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Competitors
3.3.2 Product Profiles, Application and Specification
3.3.3 DevOps Platform Market Performance (2017-2022)
3.3.4 Business Overview
3.4 Spirent Communications plc
3.4.1 Spirent Communications plc Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Competitors
3.4.2 Product Profiles, Application and Specification
3.4.3 DevOps Platform Market Performance (2017-2022)
3.4.4 Business Overview
3.5.1 DBmaestro Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Competitors
3.5.2 Product Profiles, Application and Specification
3.5.3 DevOps Platform Market Performance (2017-2022)
3.5.4 Business Overview
3.6.1 CollabNet Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Competitors
3.6.2 Product Profiles, Application and Specification
3.6.3 DevOps Platform Market Performance (2017-2022)
3.6.4 Business Overview
3.7.1 Microsoft Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Competitors
3.7.2 Product Profiles, Application and Specification
3.7.3 DevOps Platform Market Performance (2017-2022)
3.7.4 Business Overview
3.8.1 Saltstack Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Competitors
3.8.2 Product Profiles, Application and Specification
3.8.3 DevOps Platform Market Performance (2017-2022)
3.8.4 Business Overview
3.9.1 HP Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Competitors
3.9.2 Product Profiles, Application and Specification
3.9.3 DevOps Platform Market Performance (2017-2022)
3.9.4 Business Overview
3.10 Puppet Labs
3.10.1 Puppet Labs Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Competitors
3.10.2 Product Profiles, Application and Specification
3.10.3 DevOps Platform Market Performance (2017-2022)
3.10.4 Business Overview
3.11 Docker Inc.
3.11.1 Docker Inc. Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Competitors
3.11.2 Product Profiles, Application and Specification
3.11.3 DevOps Platform Market Performance (2017-2022)
3.11.4 Business Overview
3.12 CA Technologies
3.12.1 CA Technologies Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Competitors
3.12.2 Product Profiles, Application and Specification
3.12.3 DevOps Platform Market Performance (2017-2022)
3.12.4 Business Overview
3.13.1 XebiaLabs Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Competitors
3.13.2 Product Profiles, Application and Specification
3.13.3 DevOps Platform Market Performance (2017-2022)
3.13.4 Business Overview
3.14 Red Hat(Ansible)
3.14.1 Red Hat(Ansible) Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Competitors
3.14.2 Product Profiles, Application and Specification
3.14.3 DevOps Platform Market Performance (2017-2022)
3.14.4 Business Overview
3.15.1 IBM Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Competitors
3.15.2 Product Profiles, Application and Specification
3.15.3 DevOps Platform Market Performance (2017-2022)
3.15.4 Business Overview
3.16.1 Atlassian Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Competitors
3.16.2 Product Profiles, Application and Specification
3.16.3 DevOps Platform Market Performance (2017-2022)
3.16.4 Business Overview
3.17.1 Chef Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Competitors
3.17.2 Product Profiles, Application and Specification
3.17.3 DevOps Platform Market Performance (2017-2022)
3.17.4 Business Overview
3.18.1 Rackspace Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Competitors
3.18.2 Product Profiles, Application and Specification
3.18.3 DevOps Platform Market Performance (2017-2022)
3.18.4 Business Overview4 Global DevOps Platform Market Landscape by Player
4.1 Global DevOps Platform Sales and Share by Player (2017-2022)
4.2 Global DevOps Platform Revenue and Market Share by Player (2017-2022)
4.3 Global DevOps Platform Average Price by Player (2017-2022)
4.4 Global DevOps Platform Gross Margin by Player (2017-2022)
4.5 DevOps Platform Market Competitive Situation and Trends
4.5.1 DevOps Platform Market Concentration Rate
4.5.2 DevOps Platform Market Share of Top 3 and Top 6 Players
4.5.3 Mergers and Acquisitions, Expansion5 Global DevOps Platform Sales, Revenue, Price Trend by Type
5.1 Global DevOps Platform Sales and Market Share by Type (2017-2022)
5.2 Global DevOps Platform Revenue and Market Share by Type (2017-2022)
5.3 Global DevOps Platform Price by Type (2017-2022)
5.4 Global DevOps Platform Sales, Revenue and Growth Rate by Type (2017-2022)
5.4.1 Global DevOps Platform Sales, Revenue and Growth Rate of DevOps Ready (2017-2022)
5.4.2 Global DevOps Platform Sales, Revenue and Growth Rate of DevOps Enabled (2017-2022)
5.4.3 Global DevOps Platform Sales, Revenue and Growth Rate of DevOps Capable (2017-2022)6 Global DevOps Platform Market Analysis by Application
6.1 Global DevOps Platform Consumption and Market Share by Application (2017-2022)
6.2 Global DevOps Platform Consumption Revenue and Market Share by Application (2017-2022)
6.3 Global DevOps Platform Consumption and Growth Rate by Application (2017-2022)
6.3.1 Global DevOps Platform Consumption and Growth Rate of IT (2017-2022)
6.3.2 Global DevOps Platform Consumption and Growth Rate of BFSI (2017-2022)
6.3.3 Global DevOps Platform Consumption and Growth Rate of Retail (2017-2022)
6.3.4 Global DevOps Platform Consumption and Growth Rate of Telecom (2017-2022)
6.3.5 Global DevOps Platform Consumption and Growth Rate of Education (2017-2022)
6.3.6 Global DevOps Platform Consumption and Growth Rate of Others (2017-2022)7 Global DevOps Platform Sales and Revenue Region Wise (2017-2022)
7.1 Global DevOps Platform Sales and Market Share, Region Wise (2017-2022)
7.2 Global DevOps Platform Revenue and Market Share, Region Wise (2017-2022)
7.3 Global DevOps Platform Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2017-2022)
7.4 United States DevOps Platform Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2017-2022)
7.4.1 United States DevOps Platform Market Under COVID-19
7.5 Europe DevOps Platform Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2017-2022)
7.5.1 Europe DevOps Platform Market Under COVID-19
7.6 China DevOps Platform Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2017-2022)
7.6.1 China DevOps Platform Market Under COVID-19
7.7 Japan DevOps Platform Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2017-2022)
7.7.1 Japan DevOps Platform Market Under COVID-19
7.8 India DevOps Platform Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2017-2022)
7.8.1 India DevOps Platform Market Under COVID-19
7.9 Southeast Asia DevOps Platform Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2017-2022)
7.9.1 Southeast Asia DevOps Platform Market Under COVID-19
7.10 Latin America DevOps Platform Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2017-2022)
7.10.1 Latin America DevOps Platform Market Under COVID-19
7.11 Middle East and Africa DevOps Platform Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2017-2022)
7.11.1 Middle East and Africa DevOps Platform Market Under COVID-198 Global DevOps Platform Market Forecast (2022-2029)
8.1 Global DevOps Platform Sales, Revenue Forecast (2022-2029)
8.1.1 Global DevOps Platform Sales and Growth Rate Forecast (2022-2029)
8.1.2 Global DevOps Platform Revenue and Growth Rate Forecast (2022-2029)
8.1.3 Global DevOps Platform Price and Trend Forecast (2022-2029)
8.2 Global DevOps Platform Sales and Revenue Forecast, Region Wise (2022-2029)
8.2.1 United States DevOps Platform Sales and Revenue Forecast (2022-2029)
8.2.2 Europe DevOps Platform Sales and Revenue Forecast (2022-2029)
8.2.3 China DevOps Platform Sales and Revenue Forecast (2022-2029)
8.2.4 Japan DevOps Platform Sales and Revenue Forecast (2022-2029)
8.2.5 India DevOps Platform Sales and Revenue Forecast (2022-2029)
8.2.6 Southeast Asia DevOps Platform Sales and Revenue Forecast (2022-2029)
8.2.7 Latin America DevOps Platform Sales and Revenue Forecast (2022-2029)
8.2.8 Middle East and Africa DevOps Platform Sales and Revenue Forecast (2022-2029)
8.3 Global DevOps Platform Sales, Revenue and Price Forecast by Type (2022-2029)
8.3.1 Global DevOps Platform Revenue and Growth Rate of DevOps Ready (2022-2029)
8.3.2 Global DevOps Platform Revenue and Growth Rate of DevOps Enabled (2022-2029)
8.3.3 Global DevOps Platform Revenue and Growth Rate of DevOps Capable (2022-2029)
8.4 Global DevOps Platform Consumption Forecast by Application (2022-2029)
8.4.1 Global DevOps Platform Consumption Value and Growth Rate of IT (2022-2029)
8.4.2 Global DevOps Platform Consumption Value and Growth Rate of BFSI (2022-2029)
8.4.3 Global DevOps Platform Consumption Value and Growth Rate of Retail (2022-2029)
8.4.4 Global DevOps Platform Consumption Value and Growth Rate of Telecom (2022-2029)
8.4.5 Global DevOps Platform Consumption Value and Growth Rate of Education (2022-2029)
8.4.6 Global DevOps Platform Consumption Value and Growth Rate of Others (2022-2029)
8.5 DevOps Platform Market Forecast Under COVID-199 Industry Outlook
9.1 DevOps Platform Market Drivers Analysis
9.2 DevOps Platform Market Restraints and Challenges
9.3 DevOps Platform Market Opportunities Analysis
9.4 Emerging Market Trends
9.5 DevOps Platform Industry Technology Status and Trends
9.6 News of Product Release
9.7 Consumer Preference Analysis
9.8 DevOps Platform Industry Development Trends under COVID-19 Outbreak
9.8.1 Global COVID-19 Status Overview
9.8.2 Influence of COVID-19 Outbreak on DevOps Platform Industry Development10 Research Findings and Conclusion11 Appendix
11.2 Research Data Source
Browse complete table of contents at -https://www.researchreportsworld.com/TOC/21236498
Market Reports Worldis the Credible Source for Gaining the Market Reports that will Provide you with the Lead Your Business Needs. Market is changing rapidly with the ongoing expansion of the industry. Advancement in the technology has provided today’s businesses with multifaceted advantages resulting in daily economic shifts. Thus, it is very important for a company to comprehend the patterns of the market movements in order to strategize better. An efficient strategy offers the companies with a head start in planning and an edge over the competitors.
Research Reports World
US(+1) 424 253 0807
UK(+44) 203 239 8187
Top Trending Reports:
Sterile Cleanroom Masks Market 2022 Size, Share by Industry Expansion, Cost Structure, Development Status, Opportunities Analysis, Future Plans, Revenue Percentage, Market Size Estimates and Forecast 2028
Multi-Factor Authentication Market Size with Top Manufactures 2022, Global Business Trends, recent Developments,Upcoming Demand with Future Innovations, New Key Players Strategies and SWOT Analysis 2029
Press Release Distributed by The Express Wire
To view the original version on The Express Wire visit DevOps Platform Market 2022 : Growth Prospects, Latest Trends, Market Share, Development Strategy and Forecast to 2029
The MarketWatch News Department was not involved in the creation of this content.
Activision has released a trailer (opens in new tab) outlining the PC features of the upcoming Modern Warfare 2 (opens in new tab), releasing on October 28. This game is not to be confused with Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2, which was released on November 12, 2009.
It all looks pretty good, if to be expected for a AAA PC release in 2022. In between snippets of gameplay, the trailer promises features like 4k graphics and ultrawide support. The first one, ok, sure, everyone and their mother is doing 4k (or at least 4k reconstructions), but ultrawide isn't always a given, so it's nice to have the assurance from Activision.
The second big highlight of the trailer is "Ricochet Anti-Cheat," which I guess at least doesn't have the reputation of Denuvo (opens in new tab), as far as bullet point features go. Ricochet's been in use on Warzone and Vanguard for the past year, and it seems to work well enough. A quick perusal of the Warzone subreddit shows some players sporadically complaining about its implementation, but almost exclusively for it letting suspected cheaters slip through the cracks—I didn't see any performance or privacy dings against it.
The trailer concludes by highlighting "Over 500+ customization options." Going over the subsequent shots of MW2's graphics menus, there are some impressive options like custom frame rate limits and targets, image reconstruction tech like FidelityFX, and separate FOV sliders for vehicle, third person, and first person modes. All pretty granular stuff, and I definitely appreciate a good graphics menu.
Modern Warfare 2 also has some generous minimum system specs (opens in new tab): just a GTX 960 and a ten-year-old i5-3570 and you're good to go. Of course, the money you might save there would get eaten up by the series' constantly ballooning storage demands: previous configurations of Warzone have gotten dangerously close to 200GB.
Once they understood what constituted a team at Google, the researchers had to determine how to quantitatively measure effectiveness. They looked at lines of code written, bugs fixed, customer satisfaction, and more. But Google’s leaders, who had initially pushed for objective effectiveness measures, realized that every suggested measure could be inherently flawed - more lines of code aren’t necessarily a good thing and more bugs fixed means more bugs were initially created.
Instead, the team decided to use a combination of qualitative assessments and quantitative measures. For qualitative assessments, the researchers captured input from three different perspectives - executives, team leads, and team members. While they all were asked to rate teams on similar scales, when asked to explain their ratings, their answers showed that each was focused on different aspects when assessing team effectiveness.
Executives were most concerned with results (e.g., sales numbers or product launches), but team members said that team culture was the most important measure of team effectiveness. Fittingly, the team lead’s concept of effectiveness spanned both the big picture and the individuals’ concerns saying that ownership, vision, and goals were the most important measures.
So the researchers measured team effectiveness in four different ways:
The qualitative evaluations helped capture a nuanced look at results and culture, but had inherent subjectivity. On the other hand, the quantitative metrics provided concrete team measures, but lacked situational considerations. These four measures in combination, however, allowed researchers to home in on the comprehensive definition of team effectiveness.