Online 9A0-409 Actual Questions are best from

Proceed through our 9A0-409 Actual Questions plus you may really feel confident regarding the 9A0-409 check. Pass your 9A0-409 along with high marks or even your money back again. Everything you require to pass the particular 9A0-409 is provided right here. We have aggregated a database associated with 9A0-409 Actual Questions obtained from real examinations to provide you with a get prepared and pass 9A0-409 upon the very very first attempt. Simply established up 9A0-409 braindumps Exam Sim and Exam Questions. You will complete the 9A0-409 exam.

Exam Code: 9A0-409 Practice test 2022 by team
9A0-409 Adobe Premiere Pro CC 2015 ACE

Exam ID : 9A0-409
Exam Title : Adobe Premiere Pro CC 2015 ACE
Questions : 60
Duration : 90 minutes
Exam Type : multiple-choice

Adobe Digital Learning Services provides this test guide to help prepare partners, customers, and consultants who are actively seeking accreditation as Adobe Certified Experts (ACE). This guide, while designed to describe the test in detail and provide as much information as possible, is not meant to be the sole means of test preparation.
Adobe Digital Learning Services offers courses that provide in-depth training on the exam content.
Hands-on experience with the Adobe product suite is also a critical element in preparing to pass any Adobe certification exam.

The typical candidate has over three years editing experience in a professional environment in an intermediate or senior-level position, and has produced output for internal or external clients. Job titles may include: Editor, Assistant Editor, Producer, and Social Media Producer.

Exam description
The test has two parts:
• 60 multiple-choice questions, covering a range of Topics listed below
• A short survey that we use to gather information about your product experience
The test has a time limit of 90 minutes, and includes a timer to mark the remaining

The following are typical tasks that you should already be able to perform:
• Setup project(s) and sequence(s)
• Import camera media and digital assets
• Organize media
• Edit clips into a sequence and modify the order as needed
• Adjust the duration of clips using trimming tools
• Refine and enhance the audio and video portions of a project using appropriate techniques
• Exchange media or projects with other applications
• Utilize metadata, markers, and captioning data
• Create and add titles
• Create digital and analog outputs
Exam Topics may include:
Import, Organize, and Select Assets
• Importing assets
• Organizing media
• Marking ranges of clips
Work with Media and Sequences
• Creating and editing sequences
• Adding clips to a sequence
• Adjusting clips within a sequence
• Utilizing metadata, markers, and captioning data
Adjust the Audio Properties of Clips and Sequences
• Working with audio clips
• Mixing Audio Using Track Adjustments and Effects
Use Effects, Transitions and Titles
• Modifying the appearance of clips
• Creating transitions
• Working with titles
Exchange and Manage Media and Projects
• Exchanging media or projects with other applications
• Creating digital and analog media
• Managing projects and media
Exam preparation checklist
• I have a minimum of three years experience in Premiere Pro and editing in a professional environment, and have produced output for internal or external clients.
• I am familiar with Adobe Media Encoder.
• I can complete the tasks outlined in the “Exam preparation” section without assistance.
• I have read and studied the Topics listed in this test guide.

Adobe Premiere Pro CC 2015 ACE
Adobe Premiere test
Killexams : Adobe Premiere test - BingNews Search results Killexams : Adobe Premiere test - BingNews Killexams : The best laptops for video editing © PC World

Video editing is one of the most strenuous tasks you can put your PC through, so when you’re shopping for the best laptop for video editing, you’ll want to make sure you’re loading up with some heavy hardware firepower. You don’t necessarily need the absolute highest-end gear, and the processor and graphics inside the notebook are just part of the equation. Simply buying a gaming laptop and calling it a day might be enough if you’re just casually streaming or creating videos, but serious video editors will also want to take into account the quality of the display and port selection, among other factors.

A lot of notebooks have come through our test labs in our quest to find the best laptops. This has give us a comprehensive view of the laptop landscape and helps us identify laptops that fit the unique needs of video editing. Take a look at our recommendations below, followed by buying advice and information on how we test our laptops for video editing purposes. You may also want to check out our roundup of the best laptop deals to scout for discounts on content creation notebooks. We update it daily with the most recent sales.

Updated 10/10/2022 to include the Dell Inspiron 16 as our new pick for best battery life. For more info, check out our review below.

1. Dell XPS 17 (2022) – Best laptop for video editing

© PC World


・Solid performance for the price

・Massive, bright, colorful display

・Offers four Thunderbolt 4 ports

・Long battery life


・Heavy and thick

・Mediocre keyboard

・Lacks USB-A, HDMI, or Ethernet

・RTX 3060 is the quickest available GPU

MSRP: $2,799 Best Prices Today:

$2949.99 at Best Buy


$2999 at Micro Center

We consider the Dell XPS 17 the ultimate content creation laptop, so it’s no surprise to see this atop our list of the best laptops for video editing. The Intel 12th-gen Core i7-12700H processor and Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 inside deliver plenty of punch for intense edits, while a 1TB SSD delivers top-notch storage performance for moving big projects around.

The XPS 17 also includes crucial extras coveted by video editors, such as an SD card reader, Thunderbolt 4 ports aplenty, and a luscious 17-inch touchscreen panel with 3840×2400 resolution, and a more productive 16:10 aspect ratio. Dell even managed to cram all these niceties into a relatively portable-for-its-class 5.34-pound design that can run for 11 hours before needing a charge—improving upon the previous XPS 17 version by over one hour.

Read our full

Dell XPS 17 (2022)review

2. Dell XPS 15 9520 – Best screen for video editing

© PC World


・Stellar OLED display

・Chassis is rugged and gorgeous

・Booming audio

・Roomy keyboard and touchpad


・15.6 < 16 inches

・Underwhelming battery life

・Webcam is behind the times

・Limited ports

MSRP: $2,299 Best Prices Today:

$1849.99 at Best Buy


$2299 at Dell

The Dell XPS 15 9520 has a stunning OLED display and with its latest Intel Core i7-12700H CPU and GeForce RTX 3050 Ti graphics, it has become one of our favorites for content creators and video editors. To add to an already impressive system, the rugged and beautiful all-metal enclosure is just the cherry on the top of a premium-quality cake.

Despite it being a 15-inch laptop, it is a bit heavy to carry on an everyday commute, and it lacks some of the ports that come with the XPS 17 model. But the gorgeous OLED display is the star of the show, and it doesn’t let you down with a 3456X2160 resolution, 16:10 aspect ratio, and ultra vivid and accurate colors.

Read our full

Dell XPS 15 9520review

3. Asus Zenbook Pro Duo 15 OLED UX582 – A great video editing laptop with two screens

© PC World


・Dual OLED screens are a boon for mobile content creation

・Great keyboard and extra-loud speakers

・Includes a backpack, palm rest, ergonomic stand, and stylus


・Small trackpad that hates lefties

・Dual-screen software takes some getting used to

・Tech specs slightly underperform comparable laptops

MSRP: $2999.99 Best Prices Today:

$2,399.99 at Amazon


$2626.99 at Best Buy

Now for something completely different. The Asus Zenbook Pro Duo 15 OLED UX582 packs abundant firepower, including a high-end overclockable Core i9 chip, GeForce RTX 3070 graphics, 32GB of DDR4 memory, and a fast 1TB NVMe SSD. It also has a 15.6-inch 4K OLED panel that shines at a bright 440 nits while covering 100 percent of the DCI-P3 color gamut—a serious screen for serious content creators. But the truly interesting part is the secondary 14-inch 3840×1100 OLED screen situated above the keyboard. Windows counts it as a second monitor and you can use bundled Asus software to put it to all kinds of helpful tasks, such as using it as a trackpad or summoning a panel of touch controls for some Adobe apps.

The Zenbook Pro Duo 15 OLED is basically a portable high-end PC workstation, though the lack of an SD card reader may prove irksome. You can always buy an external SD reader and slap it into one of the laptops dual Thunderbolt 3 ports, though. You should also strongly consider a cheaper version than our review model on sale for $2,400 at Amazon. It switches out the high-end overclockable Core i9 chip for a Core i7 chip, and drops the memory down to 16GB. It should still be plenty speedy for video editing but costs significantly less.

Read our full

Asus Zenbook Pro Duo 15 OLED UX582review

4. Razer Blade 14 (2021) – Best ultra-portable laptop for video editing

© PC World


・It performs capably in AAA games

・The QHD panel looks great

・It’s exceptionally quiet


・AC adapter is heavy at 1.7 pounds

・Razer products are pricey

・No Thunderbolt 4 support

Best Prices Today:

$2,341.44 at Amazon


$2799.99 at Razer


$2899.99 at Adorama

If pure portability is essential, consider the Razer Blade 14. This ultra-thin laptop measures just 0.66-inch thick and tips the scales at a mere 3.9 pounds, making it significantly smaller than most laptops with video editing chops. But Razer didn’t skimp on the firepower, loading the Blade 14 with AMD’s 8-core Ryzen 9 5900HX flagship CPU, Nvidia’s 8GB GeForce RTX 3080, a 1TB NVMe SSD, and 16GB of memory.

You’ll give up some perks in exchange for the Blade’s portability though: The 14-inch IPS-grade screen comes factory calibrated, but tops out at 2560×1440 resolution. 4K video editing is off the table, though the laptop supports the full DCI-P3 color gamut. Razer’s notebook also lacks an SD card slot. But if you need a fierce rig that can chew through edits and renders then slip easily into your bag, the Blade 14 is worth considering.

Read our full

Razer Blade 14 (2021)review

5. Dell Inspiron 16 – Best laptop for battery life

© PC World


・Roomy 16-inch 16:10 display

・Long battery life

・Competitive application performance

・Comfortable keyboard and huge touchpad

・Quad speakers pump up the jams


・Lone GPU upgrade is lackluster

・Can’t go bigger than 512GB SSD

・Large screen can feel awkward in tablet mode

MSRP: $1,249.99 Best Prices Today:

$1249.99 at Best Buy


$1249.99 at Dell


$1379.00 at Amazon

If it’s battery life that you’re concerned about, the Dell Inspiron 16 should cover you just fine. When we ran our battery benchmark, which cycles through a series of tasks and videos until the laptop dies, the Inspiron 16 lasted a marathon 16.5 hours on a single charge. That should allow you to edit to your heart’s content while out on the road. Due to the battery, it isn’t the most portable, however, weighing in at a substantial 4.7 pounds.

It’s rather inexpensive, but for the price you will have to make sacrifices. It sports a Intel Core i7-1260P CPU, Intel Iris Xe graphics, 16GB of RAM, and 512GB of SSD storage. While that should get the job done with most video-editing projects, it does lack storage capacity, so you will need an external drive if your saving video files. What really makes this laptop shine though, is the outstanding battery life which is an often overlooked aspect of mobile video editors. And as a bonus perk, it also comes with a surprisingly robust quad speaker system. For ports, you’re getting two USB Type-C, one USB-A 3.2 Gen 1, one HDMI, one SD card reader, and one 3.5mm audio jack.

Read our full

Dell Inspiron 16 2-in-1review

6. MSI GE76 Raider – Best gaming laptop for video editing

© PC World


・12th-gen Core i9-12900HK simply sings

・New “AI” performance mode greatly moderates fan noise.

・1080p webcam and good mic and audio makes for decent video conferencing PC


・Third iteration in the same body

・MSI Center is confusing and cluttered UI

・Painful pricing

MSRP: $4,200 (Core i9, RTX 3080 Ti) Best Prices Today:

$4200 at Adorama


$4200 at MSI

If you’re looking for the most raw firepower possible, on the other hand, nothing burns through video edits faster than a big, heavy gaming laptop. The MSI GE76 Raider chewed through the Adobe Premiere test in UL’s Procyon benchmark faster than any other notebook thanks to its burly 14-core Intel Core i9-12900HK chip, an Nvidia RTX 3080 Ti tuned for a blistering 175 watts, and ample interior cooling. It even has an SD Express card reader hooked into the PCIe bus for high-speed card transfers. One downside to using last year’s model was its gamer-focused 360Hz 1080p display, but the higher-end version of this year’s 12UHS added a 4K, 120Hz panel that, while not tuned for content creation, should satisfy video editors much more, especially with its spacious 17.3-inch screen size. You sure pay for all that firepower, though.

Read our full

GE76 Raider 12UHSreview

7. HP Envy 14 14t-eb000 (2021) – Best budget laptop for video editing

© PC World


・Good value for the money

・Fantastic battery life

・Quiet fan, with no detectable performance throttling

・Thunderbolt 4 support


・Slightly quirky keyboard layout

・Webcam’s signature feature is ineffective

MSRP: 950.99 Best Prices Today:

$950.99 at

You’ll need to spend up for heftier hardware if you want the fastest possible video edits and renders, but not everyone can afford to. If you want a solid, basic content creation laptop that won’t break the bank, check out the HP Envy 14. The entry-level GeForce GTX 1650 Ti GPU and Core i5-1135G7 processor aren’t barnburners, but they’ll get the job done, and at roughly $1,000 the price is certainly right. The 14-inch 1900×1200 display features a 16:10 aspect ratio for improved productivity, along with factory color calibration and 100-percent sRGB support (though not DCI-P3). Better yet, the HP Envy 14 includes crucial SD card and Thunderbolt ports, and it runs surprisingly quiet too.

Read our full

HP Envy 14 14t-eb000 (2021)review

8. Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 – Another gaming laptop that's great for content creation

© PC World


・Excellent CPU and GPU performance

・Robust and innovative design

・Comfortable and customizable keyboard


・Trackpad requires some pressure

・Very high price

MSRP: $2,200 (base unit) up to $3,700 (review unit) Best Prices Today:

$2,442.00 at Amazon


$3699.99 at Asus


$3699.99 at Costco

The Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 is a video editor’s ultimate dream. This laptop features lightning-fast GPU and CPU performance plus a stunning 17.3-inch 4K display with a 120Hz refresh rate. The rugged all-metal chassis, six speaker sound system, and customizable keyboard really adds to the premium experience as well. Better yet for video editors, it also includes an SD card slot and Thunderbolt ports galore. However, you’re going to pay out the nose for it. If you’ve got a flexible budget and you won’t settle for anything other than the best of the best, the Zephyrus S17 is truly the bees knees.

Read our full

Asus ROG Zephyrus S17review

9. XPG Xenia 15 KC – Powerful portability, with minor caveats

© PC World


・Very light

・Very quiet

・(relatively) very fast


・Subpar RGB

・Just barely adequate audio

・SD card reader barely adequate

MSRP: 1999 Best Prices Today:

Not Available at Amazon

When it comes to powerful laptops, many, if not most, of them are pretty bulky and heavy, often tipping the scales at five or six pounds. Well, that’s not the case with the XPG Xenia 15 KC. It weighs a little over four pounds, which is fairly lightweight for a laptop that’s capable of delivering zippy performance across the board. Plus, it runs very quiet. According to our review, it “rarely makes noise under normal use.” That’s impressive, as most gaming laptops tend to sound like a rocket blasting off. If you’re looking for something that’s both quiet and portable, the Xenia 15 KC is an excellent choice, though its 1440p display and relatively slow SD card reader performance may make some content creators balk.

Read our full

XPG Xenia 15 KCreview

What to look for in a laptop for video editing

The most important thing to look for in a laptop for video editing is its CPU and GPU. The faster your hardware, the faster your edits, essentially. In addition to subjecting all of the laptops above to our usual battery of benchmarks, we also ran the UL Procyon Video Editing Test on several high-powered laptops to see which hardware performs best for this sort of work. The benchmark tasks Adobe Premiere with importing two different video projects, applying visual effects such as color grading and transitions, and then exporting it using H.264, H.265 at both 1080p and 4K.

Right-click and select “open in new tab” to see in full resolution. © PC World Right-click and select “open in new tab” to see in full resolution.

Gordon Mah Ung / IDG

The best performance came from big, heavy laptops running Intel’s 11th-generation processors, though notebooks with AMD’s beefy Ryzen 9 processors came in just behind, with 10th-gen Intel chips still putting up a respectable score. They’re not in the chart above, but newer Intel 12th-gen laptops run even faster still. The best-performing laptops all paired modern Intel CPUs with Nvidia’s RTX 30-series GPUs, which isn’t surprising as both companies have invested a lot of time and resources into optimizing their Adobe performance.

The GPU matters more than CPU in Premiere Pro, though things reach a point of diminishing returns very quickly. Notebooks wielding top-tier RTX 3080 graphics are indeed faster at video editing than laptops with more modest RTX 3060 graphics, but not by that much. If you look at the scores from the Dell XPS 17 9710, its GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU is maybe 14 percent slower than the fastest RTX 3080 in the MSI GE76 Raider. That’s not a lot, especially when you consider how big and thick the GE76 Raider is compared to the Dell laptop.

In general, having any sort of discrete graphics is preferred, with at least an RTX 3060 recommended for serious video editing.

Video editing is very workflow dependent however. Your particular task and tool might be more CPU intensive, or lean more on the GPU than Premiere. If so, adjust your priorities accordingly. The selections above should all be great well-rounded options, however. Intel and Nvidia have spent years building up tools like Quick Sync and CUDA, respectively, and many video editing apps can see significant speed boosts because of it. AMD hardware does fine for video editing, but we recommend sticking to Intel and Nvidia unless you have a strong reason otherwise, especially if your workflow relies on their vendor-specific software optimizations.

If you’re transferring video from a camera, an SD card port (like this one on the Dell XPS 17) is essential, unless you’re comfortable plugging an SD card adapter into a high-speed USB or Thunderbolt port. © PC World If you’re transferring video from a camera, an SD card port (like this one on the Dell XPS 17) is essential, unless you’re comfortable plugging an SD card adapter into a high-speed USB or Thunderbolt port.

Gordon Mah Ung/IDG

It’s not all about the internals though. PCWorld video director Adam Patrick Murray stresses that an ideal laptop for video editing includes an SD card reader for grabbing video off a camera. He also recommends opting for a notebook with a 4K, 60Hz panel over the ultra-fast 1080p panels often found on gaming laptops that would otherwise be ideal for video editing. You need a 4K panel to edit 4K videos well, and blazing-fast refresh rates don’t mean anything for video editing like they do for gaming. If color accuracy matters to you—it might not if you’re only creating casual videos for your personal YouTube channel, for example—then support for the full DCI-P3 color gamut is also a must, along with Delta E < 2 color accuracy.

You won’t often find those sorts of specs listed for (or supported by) gaming laptops, but dedicated content creation laptops should include that information. That said, if you want the fastest possible laptop for video editing that can also satisfy your gaming proclivities, you can always pair that burly gaming laptop with a color-accurate external monitor for creation tasks.

If you’re looking for a more general purpose notebook, be sure to check out our guide to the best laptops for picks for every budget. You may also find solid laptops for video editing for cheap in our roundup of the best laptop deals, which we update daily with the latest sales.

Mon, 17 Oct 2022 04:02:11 -0500 en-US text/html
Killexams : Intel Arc Multi-GPU Rendering, Encoding & Math Performance

It’s been a couple of weeks since Intel launched its long-awaited top-end Arc GPUs, the A770 and A750, both of which we put through our gauntlet of tests, including rendering, encoding, photogrammetry, AI, and math. That might sound exhaustive, but the truth is, it feels like we’ve just scratched the surface on different performance angles to tackle. This article helps fill the void for another.

While we covered encoding in our Arc launch articles, we still have plans to tackle Hyper Encode soon – the mode that allows you to accelerate encoding by combining the forces of Arc discrete GPUs and Intel’s integrated graphics. We plan to dive into this advanced encoding testing after the 13th-gen launches, when we can stop stressing over upcoming embargoes, and are able to spend quality time evaluating things. Of course, we also intend to tackle gaming, as well, after our initial creator angles are covered. That will include a look at Linux gaming, as we’ve seen a number of requests for that directly to us, and around the web.

In this article, we’re taking a look at a more unique angle of Arc: multi-GPU. We’re not sure how much focus Intel has had on multi-GPU performance for Arc, but the performance results below will help paint us a nice picture. In putting together this article, we also had a chance to double-check which creative applications we test with can even use multiple GPUs. While it’s effectively implied that rendering workloads will always support multi-GPU, those are not the only benefiting workloads that exist.

We tested every single one of the workloads from our Arc launch articles in a dual-GPU setup, and you may find yourself surprised by some of the results. Before getting to those results and some discussion on tests, here’s a quick look at our test PC’s configuration:

Which Applications Support Multi-GPU?

As mentioned above, rendering is one type of workload where you can safely expect that multiple CPUs or GPUs will be utilized to great effect. As these are straight-forward compute workloads, there are no issues of weak (or worsened) performance as we’ve seen in games when utilizing multiple GPUs via AMD’s CrossFire or NVIDIA’s SLI. Adding a second GPU should always dramatically reduce render times.

Even still, assuming multi-GPU will work doesn’t mean that Intel’s added the proper polish to its driver alongside the major launch of its first-gen Arcs – though, thankfully, it has:

In the shot above, you can see the Secret Deer project being rendered in Blender, and via HWiNFO, we can see that both chips are being utilized well. As we’ll see in the results, LuxMark benefits just the same from multiple Arc GPUs. Encoding, on the other hand, is iffier:

Having two discrete Arc GPUs installed in a machine seems to confuse Adobe’s Premiere Pro (and thus Media Encoder), as neither of their video engines end up being used. Instead, all work is relegated to the CPU and GPU cores. This means that transcodes are slower, and that advanced projects with effects added will outright fail. Dual Arc behaves similarly to AMD’s encoderless Radeons (eg: RX 6400 and RX 6500 XT).

We’re not sure if Premiere Pro will ever plan to utilize multiple GPUs for encoding, but we hope a future update will at least make it so only one Arc GPU is properly used if multiple are installed.

HandBrake doesn’t collapse when multiple Arc GPUs are present, but we encountered another anomaly. When a second Arc is added into the system, an option for “Enable QuickSync Deep Link Hyper Encode” appears. That gave us the impression that both GPUs would in fact be used, but not so. We believe this feature is just a bug, as “Hyper Encode” refers explicitly to encoding with both an Arc discrete GPU and integrated graphics. If that accelerated encoding is possible, though, we’d hope to see the option extended to multiple discrete cards in the future.

The odd behavior with HandBrake doesn’t end there, as we noticed that encoding performance actually dropped when merely having two Arc GPUs installed. With one single A750, we hit 148 FPS in our test HEVC encode. With two Arc GPUs present, that performance dropped to 128 FPS – despite the fact that only the first card’s video engine was being utilized.

As for other types of encoding, we were hopeful that Adobe’s Lightroom Classic would support multiple GPUs, but that’s unfortunately not the case. In fact, depending on the GPU you have, you may be lucky if the software even decides to automatically engage it. To ensure you’re getting proper acceleration, you’ll need to head into the options, and make sure it states “full” instead of “limited”. If it’s the latter, then choosing the Custom option and manually choosing to enable it should work. The reason some GPUs work out-of-the-box and others don’t boils down to an annoyance called “whitelists”.

Lastly, we gave dual Arc a test in Topaz’s Gigapixel AI, and while that software fully supports multiple GPUs, we saw the exact same performance with two GPUs as we originally did with one. We’ll revisit that tool down-the-road to see if anything’s changed.

Arc Performance, Times Two

When using multiple GPUs to accelerate your creative work, it’s ideal that each one is the exact same make and model, although a different version of the same specific GPU is good enough (even if resulting clocks are a bit different). You’re still able to mix-and-match two different cards together and see performance uplifts, but the overall efficiency might not be to the same level.

For these results, we’ve tackled both angles: combining two A750s together for a proper multi-GPU look, as well testing A770 + A750 to see if any oddities arise from having dissimilar GPUs. We produced a similar sort of article following the NVIDIA Ampere GeForce launch, where we put an RTX 3080 alongside the Turing generation to see how scaling fared – it’s worth checking out if you want a wider view of what to expect when going that route.

Let’s start with a look at Blender:

Please note that the BMW, Classroom, and Secret Deer projects have all been modified (vs. the native file on Blender’s demo files page) to run longer and warm each GPU up better. You can see our changes in our previous Blender deep-dive article.

This type of performance scaling is exactly what we hoped to see when we first glanced at the results. We don’t see results quite cut right in half, but that’s not typical to begin with – and both the BMW and Classroom projects still came close to achieving it.

The elephant (or deer) in the room is that NVIDIA’s OptiX is so strong in Blender, that GeForce is going to be the best choice. It’s notable just how strong Intel is against AMD, though. Radeon support for Blender has been refined again and again, and yet Intel comes out of (relatively) nowhere and delivers far better performance – where lower-end Arcs outperform higher-end Radeons. It’s something to see.

Similar gains can be seen in LuxMark, which represents LuxCoreRender performance:

It’s humorous to see Arc sit behind the GeForce RTX 4090 here – or, it at least would be without context. Still, it’s neat to see dual Arc GPUs soar to the top of certain charts.

As we covered before, Premiere Pro does not agree with having two Arc GPUs installed, but BRAW Speed Test does. This might not be a big surprise to Blackmagic Design DaVinci Resolve users, as that software has long touted support for multiple GPUs – although it doesn’t Improve every performance aspect. It obviously does Improve decode performance, however:

With our Agisoft Metashape photogrammetry test, we also saw a performance uplift with the Build Depth Maps part of the process:

We’ve never tested multiple GPUs in Metashape before, so we were pleased to see these sorts of results. Most of a photogrammetry process utilizes the CPU, but when the GPU is called-upon, multiple GPUs can shave precious seconds off of the entire process. Both AMD and NVIDIA perform well in Metashape in general, so we’d assume these same sorts of gains would also be seen with GeForces and Radeons.

To wrap-up, we wanted to re-test the last piece of software that we knew would show clear performance boosts from having multiple GPUs: SiSoftware’s Sandra. Across all four of our benchmarked tests, the combined Arc cards saw massive gains in the charts:

The most notable result here might be the Financial test, as both dual-GPU Arc configurations sit behind only the RTX 4090. That performance seen out of the RTX 4090 is something else, it must be said. It more than doubled the throughput of the RTX 3090. If only we saw gains like those every single generation!

Final Thoughts

We still can’t speak to the stability or performance-factor of Arc’s drivers for gaming, but we can say that throughout all of our exhaustive creator testing, we’ve not experienced a single driver issue – no crashes, no stalls, nothing that ever stood out. Instead, the current state of things continues to impress us.

Would you have been surprised if multi-GPU on Arc wasn’t working correctly? We honestly wouldn’t have ahead of the recent launch. After all, we’re talking about a third vendor entering a hotly contested market, and making drivers both reliable and performant for most workloads is not a trivial task. Yet, we’ve had great luck so far in all of our testing – even when it comes to combining two GPUs together.

So… the big question. Are we suggesting going the multi-GPU route? As with all things creator, it’s impossible to make that kind of suggestion as a blanket statement. As we’ve seen proof of in our results so many times, you can’t look at the performance from one workload and assume your other workloads will scale the same way. You need to prioritize your most important workloads, and go from there.

With solutions like Blender, it doesn’t make sense to go the multi-GPU Arc route, because a single lower-end NVIDIA card with OptiX enabled will beat it. LuxCoreRender is different, where dual Arcs soar to the top to sit just behind the RTX 3080.

We also only tested multiple Arc GPUs here. We don’t have duplicate versions of any of the others, but maybe in time we’ll make that happen and see how all three vendors scale with multiple GPUs. With Intel new to the discrete desktop market, we simply wanted to see how the company’s drivers fared in such a niche configuration. We’re happy to be able to say that we’re left more impressed than we expected to be.

Support our efforts! With ad revenue at an all-time low for written websites, we're relying more than ever on reader support to help us continue putting so much effort into this type of content. You can support us by becoming a Patron, or by using our Amazon shopping affiliate links listed through our articles. Thanks for your support!

Mon, 17 Oct 2022 06:04:00 -0500 en-US text/html
Killexams : Adobe Premiere Pro vs Apple Final Cut Pro

Adobe Premiere Pro or Final Cut Pro? When you’re investing in the best video editing software for you, it’s an important decision - both offer first-class editing tools for beginners and professionals, for the home or studio in different ways. 

A lot relies on how you’ll use the video editor. Adobe Premiere Pro is a gold-standard, used across the film & TV industry - in our 5-star review, we reckoned, the software earned it's reputation as one of the best video editing software tools for professionals looking to create "an effective movie-making workflow.”