Shortest course for S10-101 exam in our S10-101 examcollection

Assuming you are intrigued to confront the Snia SNIA Storage Network Foundations test to take the risk to qualify, has accurate S10-101 test inquiries with a reason to ensure you breeze through S10-101 test effectively by rehearsing S10-101 cheat sheets. We offer you the legitimate, most recent cutting-edge S10-101 questions and answers with a 100 percent unconditional promise.

Exam Code: S10-101 Practice test 2022 by team
SNIA Storage Network Foundations
Snia Foundations approach
Killexams : Snia Foundations approach - BingNews Search results Killexams : Snia Foundations approach - BingNews Killexams : Private Foundations – What to Know No result found, try new keyword!“The people who gave the money to make Mister Rogers’ Neighborhood are the people of this station and other Public Television Stations and The Sears-Roebuck Foundation.” If you grew up ... Fri, 30 Sep 2022 03:30:00 -0500 en text/html Killexams : If Foundations Want to Encourage Transparency, They Should Look in the Mirror

Foundations say they like transparency. This is more than a passing fad. They have extolled its virtues for 70 years — ever since Russell Leffingwill, then board chair of the Carnegie Corporation, told a 1952 congressional hearing scrutinizing philanthropy that “foundations should have glass pockets” to ease suspicions about their work and ensure their value to society was clearly understood.

Foundations champion transparency on the part of grantees as well, insisting on measures for effectiveness, program performance, financial management, and evidence that grant dollars are used efficiently.

They also push for transparency in government and business. Some, for instance, have called for greater transparency in the tech industry to weed out inequitable and discriminatory practices.

Most grant makers, however, fail to live up to their professed transparency standards. They strictly control data and narratives about their own performance in areas such as investment, staff, strategy, and allocation of funds. They generally do little more than the bare minimum required by the IRS and state charity regulators, which means making their latest tax returns, and sometimes their audited financial statements, available.

Compare this to public companies, with which foundations — especially the large ones — share ample public benefits, including favorable tax treatment, prestige, resources, and regulation that enhances their ability to raise funds.

For-profit public companies provide extensive data about their business and financial strategy, and performance on their 10-K report to the Securities and Exchange Commission — information necessary to make an informed decision about investing in the company. Foundations that both enjoy generous public benefits and insist on transparency from others should meet a similar standard.

How can grant makers stop flirting with transparency and embrace it? By providing the public with the equivalent of a foundation 10-K. They owe nothing less to their constituent investors: taxpayers, regulators, grantees, and fellow donors.

The foundation 10-K would disclose the workings and financial aspects of the entire operation, including obstacles standing in the way of achieving its mission. It would go beyond recitations of spending on grants and related administrative expenses and would include information about endowment investments, which produce most, if not all, of the foundation’s assets and income.

Most foundations provide no useful information about their investment portfolios, and the largest are the murkiest. According to Foundation Mark, which tracks foundations’ endowment performance, large foundations — those with more than $500 million in assets — typically invest about half of their endowment dollars in undisclosed private assets such as mortgage-backed securities, private-equity shares, and foreign stocks, making them especially opaque.

Full transparency would allow organizations such as Candid or the Center for Effective Philanthropy to provide robust analysis and comparisons to peer organizations. Investment strategies could be examined alongside giving to see if they square with the foundation’s mission, and grant makers would have a venue to explain their choices, strategies, and challenges. Reports on potential risks to achieving missions could include an analysis of whether the resources the foundation has put toward accomplishing its goals are adequate, how its resources complement those provided by government and other donors, and whether grant spending and endowment investing are working at cross purposes or adding power to one another’s approach.

Alongside such analysis could be what’s known as an MD&A, or management discussion and analysis, which adds context to financial audits or other quantitative reports. For foundations, this could cover how the organization is addressing potential challenges to its mission goals, investment policies and strategy, and progress on pledges in areas such as diversity, equity, and inclusion.

Sound like a lot? That’s just part of what public companies disclose in their 10-Ks. And it’s typical of the volume and nature of information provided by nonprofit grantees.

To establish this new transparency, foundations could start by reporting on a common form that builds on and goes beyond current IRS filings, audits, and annual reports. Using aspects of the 10-K would be possible, although the level of detail and frequency could be adjusted. Above all, the reports would honor the public pledges and rhetoric on the virtues of transparency touted by the field.

Barring the IRS changing its rules and demanding more of this type of information from foundations, this would be voluntary for now and would likely need to be coordinated by a group such as Candid. But if more large and prominent grant makers sign on in a very public and, yes, transparent way, peer pressure could lead many more to follow.

Improving Performance

The reasons for full transparency are clear: Openness improves performance. Without such openness, foundations are unable to credibly assess their own value and are stuck in an unproductive narrative loop about their worthiness and effectiveness.

To be sure, transparency and the scrutiny it brings can be threatening. I learned that years ago when I served as CEO of the Nonprofit Finance Fund, a community development financial institution. The CDFI world came up with a system for comparing the organizations’ operations, impact, financial data, and efficiency called CDFIs Side-by-Side. We did this, of course, with grants from several large foundations.

My peers and I had to accommodate — and then embrace — this unwelcome transparency. We not only survived, but greatly benefited from the new level of accountability. By learning about the operations of others, we discovered how our own work could be improved. We were able to see opportunities for cooperation that transcended program divisions and competition. The field grew in stature. It was a tonic.

Similarly, when the Heron Foundation, an antipoverty grant maker I led, looked closely at its endowment portfolio, we were forced to confront some uncomfortable surprises. We learned, for example, that we had a stake in the Corrections Corporation of America, the largest private prison owner and operator in the United States, now rebranded as Core Civic. Prison time is disproportionately served by people with low incomes and reliably destroys future wealth-building and job opportunities. This was hardly a good investment for a foundation whose mission is “helping people and communities help themselves out of poverty.”

We decided to be fully transparent about our discovery, along with our portfolio. We wrote about the investment on our website and eventually sold our stake in the company. We also embraced a strategy of investing in companies we thought made a larger net contribution to our mission. To ignore that deep contradiction, we thought, would undermine the work of Heron’s grantees. Core Civic’s lobbying budget, for example, exceeded grant dollars available to some grantees many times over.

Battling Misinformation

The rewards that can come through such transparency are, for now at least, largely in the hands of individual foundations. Foundation Mark uses publicly available data to compare the investment performance of different foundations. The Center for Effective Philanthropy compares the grant making of foundations who sign up for an audit to that of their peers based on their own criteria. But since the reports are typically undisclosed and are funded by foundations, the organization rarely functions as a full-throated critic.

Despite the best of intentions, Candid’s Glasspockets project — its very name reflecting Russell Leffingwell’s aspirations for the field — has made little progress in its 12 years of operation. Even if the universe of foundations is reduced from the approximately 83,000 large enough to file with the IRS to the some 8,300 with websites, only about 100, or 1.2 percent, have provided the information necessary to receive a rating. And Glasspocket’s list of what’s needed to merit a check mark for transparency includes such low-bar items as “contact information,” “mission statement,” and “board of directors list.”

Candid and Glasspockets deserve applause for trying, but the participation rate and quality is a barometer of the indifference, even hostility, of its constituents toward such endeavors and one more indicator that foundations’ embrace of transparency doesn’t extend to themselves.

At a time when the internet and social media have made vast supplies of information (and misinformation) readily available, there is no excuse for philanthropy to continue constructing walls around its own operations. Foundations can gain in stature and credibility by revealing themselves to the world as public companies do. And large grant makers have a special responsibility to lead the way.

When foundations crack open their protective, closed world — even just a little —the fresh air will do them and the whole field a world of good.

Wed, 28 Sep 2022 09:56:00 -0500 en text/html
Killexams : Giving money isn’t the only way for foundations to do good

Debra Walker Johnson is president and executive director of the Forest Preserve Foundation and former board co-chair at Chicago Women in Philanthropy.

We are witnessing a new wave of minority foundation leaders finally having a seat at the philanthropic table. The changing face of philanthropy presents the opportunity to re-examine how funding decisions are made and explore new approaches to grant-making, especially to communities of color. For far too long, nonprofits have struggled with being expected to do more with less. This is especially true of minority-led organizations. In the wake of the pandemic, racial reckoning, environmental concerns and other challenges that have all highlighted inequities in funding, this is a crucial moment for foundation leaders to explore new approaches to grant-making.

Many of these new foundation leaders come to their positions armed with extensive experience in the nonprofit sector and firsthand knowledge of the obstacles nonprofits face in securing funding to support their mission. They have experienced the countless hoops nonprofits often have to jump through just to be invited to submit a proposal. With this experience, plus the call for foundations to reconsider how grant-making decisions are determined, we have an opportunity to imagine something different.

Approaches such as participatory grant-making, trust-based philanthropy or community-centric funding are being looked at to address inequities in grant-making decisions. All involve looking at new ways to shift the balance of power for grant-making by challenging the decision-making structure that has guided many foundations' philanthropic work for years. Nonprofits and community members have historically been excluded from these critical conversations.

The premise of a trust-based approach is that it encourages funders and donors to incorporate feedback and insights from those who will be most affected by funding decisions. It involves trusting those who are on the ground doing the work, and trusting that they know what they are doing and that they know how it needs to be done. A trust-based approach requires funders to move past traditional decision-making models where they make vital decisions on causes to support despite a lack of personal experience with the cause. It also requires funders to consider what it means to share power with nonprofits and communities. It recognizes that communities that are directly impacted have the expertise and knowledge to create the solutions and are the best deciders for what they need for their communities and their work.

Get 4 weeks of Crain's for $1

Here are a few points to consider:

Grant-makers should see nonprofits as a partner in helping to address issues impacting society. They must partner with nonprofits to discuss realistic metrics and timelines for achieving goals. Funder applications, letters of inquiry and reports can take an excessive amount of time to complete and put additional burdens on smaller nonprofits that are often understaffed and under-resourced. Grant-makers can explore ways to reduce the administrative burden placed on nonprofits to secure funding by streamlining the grant-making process.

Be bold in grant-making to support the mission of the organization. MacKenzie Scott's no-strings-attached giving of more than $12 billion to nonprofits is often cited in examples of bold grant-making. Not all foundations can provide this much, but they can stretch beyond their usual giving bucket. Consider giving multiyear, unrestricted funding that supports the organization's mission rather than focusing solely on the program. Multiyear, unrestricted funding allows grantees to assess and determine where grant dollars are most needed and facilitates innovation and sustainability.

In addition to monetary support, provide access to resources that can be helpful in building the organization's capacity. This is especially critical for organizations that have historically gone without access to networks to secure resources.

If philanthropy truly wants to make a difference, we must recognize that grant-makers don't have all the answers. They must provide up some of their power and listen to the leadership of those closer to the ground. Grantees and communities provide valuable perspectives that can inform and guide strategies to address issues impacting our communities, making our work more successful in the long run.

High-quality journalism isn’t free. Please consider subscribing to Crain's.

Sun, 09 Oct 2022 17:42:00 -0500 en text/html
Killexams : 13 Foundations Your Favorite Celebrities Swear By

As POPSUGAR editors, we independently select and write about stuff we love and think you'll like too. If you buy a product we have recommended, we may receive affiliate commission, which in turn supports our work.

  • If you've every admired a celebrity's makeup, you've probably wondered what foundation they use.
  • Celebrity-loved foundations include options from notable brands like Giorgio Armani, Dior, and BareMinerals.
  • See which foundations Meghan Markle, Hailey Bieber, Kendall Jenner, and more use.

If you've ever wished you could take a peek into your favorite celebrity's medicine cabinet or makeup bag, we can relate. You're currently among people who pause, screenshot, and zoom in on Instagram posts and TikTok videos to see what products are lining a star's vanity. It's always fun to learn about a celeb's must-have products — the items they reach for constantly and actually buy for themselves. Already we know what a handful of celebrities smell like and the lip combos they re-create time and time again, but now, we're rounding up the foundations they use.

Many people are picky about their foundation; they have a go-to and stay loyal to it for years. That means shopping for a new option can be tricky, but if a product earns a celebrity's stamp of approval (organically, that is), that piques our interest. It's even better when a star is introduced to a foundation by their makeup artist, which is the case for Meghan Markle. That's how you know it's really worth a try.

These celebrity-approved foundations range in price, from $6 to $83, and the brands range from high-end companies like Dior to affordable drugstore heroes like Nyx Professional Makeup. Whether you're looking for something full coverage and matte or lightweight with a barely there finish, there's something for you on this list. If you're on the hunt for a new option or just curious about what stars use on their face, keep scrolling.

Thu, 22 Sep 2022 11:30:00 -0500 en-US text/html
Killexams : Optical foundations illuminated by quantum light

Optics, the study of light, is one of the oldest fields in physics and has never ceased to surprise researchers. Although the classical description of light as a wave phenomenon is rarely questioned, the physical origins of some optical effects are. A team of researchers at Tampere University have brought the discussion on one fundamental wave effect, the debate around the anomalous behavior of focused light waves, to the quantum domain.

The researchers have been able to show that quantum waves behave significantly differently from their classical counterparts and can be used to increase the precision of distance measurements. Their findings also add to the discussion on physical of the anomalous focusing behavior. The results are now published in Nature Photonics.

"Interestingly, we started with an idea based on our earlier results and set out to structure for enhanced measurement precision. However, we then realized that the underlying physics of this application also contributes to the long debate about the origins of the Gouy phase anomaly of focused light fields," explains Robert Fickler, group leader of the Experimental Quantum Optics group at Tampere University.

Quantum waves behave differently but point to the same origin

Over the last decades, methods for structuring light fields down on the single photon level have vastly matured and led to a myriad of novel findings. In addition, a better of optics' foundations has been achieved. However, the physical origin of why light behaves in such an unexpected way when going through a focus, the so-called Gouy phase anomaly, is still often debated. This is despite its widespread use and importance in optical systems. The novelty of the current study is now to put the effect into the quantum domain.

"When developing the theory to describe our experimental results, we realized (after a long debate) that the Gouy phase for quantum light is not only different than the standard one, but its origin can be linked to another quantum effect. This is just like what was speculated in an earlier work," adds Doctoral researcher Markus Hiekkamäki, leading author of the study.

In the quantum domain, the anomalous behavior is sped up when compared to classical light. As the Gouy phase behavior can be used to determine the distance a beam of light has propagated, the speed up of the quantum Gouy could allow for an improvement in the precision of measuring distances.

With this new understanding at hand, the researchers are planning to develop novel techniques to enhance their measurement abilities such that it will be possible to measure more complex beams of structured photons. The team expects that this will help them push forward the application of the observed effect, and potentially bring to light more differences between quantum and classical light fields.

More information: Markus Hiekkamäki et al, Observation of the quantum Gouy phase, Nature Photonics (2022). DOI: 10.1038/s41566-022-01077-w

Provided by Tampere University

Citation: Optical foundations illuminated by quantum light (2022, October 7) retrieved 17 October 2022 from

This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Thu, 06 Oct 2022 12:00:00 -0500 en text/html
Killexams : 20 Best Foundations for Mature Skin, According to Experts
best foundation for mature skin

Nars, IT Cosmetics, Georgio Armani

There’s nothing like finding the best foundation for mature skin—one that matches your skin tone just right, has the perfect amount of coverage (and that won’t sink into fine lines and wrinkles), and has a comfortable and luxe texture. Cosmetic companies already tout hydrating foundations for those with dry skin, foundations for acne-prone skin, and even options for those with oily skin. But, If you’re interested in aging gracefully, and in whatever way that makes you feel good, finding the best foundation for mature skin is key.

“Mature skin responds best to products that help hydrate and plump the skin,” explains Roberta Del Campo, M.D., medical advisor for BABOR and founder of Del Campo Dermatology & Laser Institute. Formulas that contain skin-loving ingredients like hyaluronic acid and ceramides, or active ingredients commonly found in anti-aging serums like vitamin C, are effective at not only smoothing the skin, but keeping it healthy too.

The best part about the beauty world is that there are so many amazing products to choose from, making it so there’s truly something for everyone. Whether you’re looking for a dewy or natural finish or something high-coverage and long-lasting, we’ve got you covered. Keep reading for the best foundations for mature skin experts recommend most, plus how to choose the best one for you.

How we chose the best foundations for mature skin

We consulted Dr. Del Campo, Marisa Garshick, M.D., a leading board-certified dermatologist at Manhattan Dermatology and Cosmetic Surgery and advisor of BioRepublic, Kierra Lanice, celebrity makeup artist and beauty expert, and Jamie Greenberg, celebrity makeup artist and founder of Blighlighter and Bloss, sifted through countless customer reviews, and conducted our own research to find the best foundations for mature skin available.

Our top picks

Wed, 28 Sep 2022 05:00:00 -0500 Shannen Zitz en-US text/html
Killexams : These Foundations Reign Supreme for Women Over 50

Embracing your look as you age means adjusting your skin care and makeup regimens to best suit your ever-evolving skin. With that comes a new focus on finding the best foundation for mature skin. To veil anything from dark spots to fine lines, the right complexion products make all the difference.

As you would with your skin care salves of choice, experts recommend picking a foundation with multifunctional, skin-loving properties. “I look for a foundation that targets the concerns of mature skin, such as loss of radiance, uneven skin tone, and moisture balance,” explains celebrity makeup artist Carolina Dalí-Trites. The right level of hydration ensures that the formula melts into skin without caking or creasing. With this in mind, read on to discover the best foundations for mature skin that pair immaculate coverage with a natural finish.

The All-Around Pick

Giorgio Armani Luminous Silk Foundation

Giorgio Armani Luminous Silk Foundation

  • Why We Love It: When we tapped makeup pros Dalí-Trites, Tobi Henney, and Janice Kinjo, each of them recommended Giorgio Armani’s Luminous Silk Foundation. While Kinjo notes it’s her go-to “that won’t settle into fine lines,” Dalí-Trites believes it “looks and feels like a second skin.” Henney shares that she reaches for this formula while working with Diane von Furstenberg for an event or photo shoot: “I use this a lot in my work, as it creates the most flawless base for all skin types.”
  • More to Know: Inspired by charmeuse silk, this oil-free foundation is infused with finely milled color pigments to impart medium coverage and a radiant, airbrushed finish that resembles a lit-from-within glow.

The Weightless Wear

Chanel Les Beiges Healthy Glow Foundation Hydration and Longwear

Chanel Les Beiges Healthy Glow Foundation Hydration and Longwear

  • Why We Love It: Celebrity makeup artist Meredith Baraf, who counts Brooke Shields, Erin Andrews, and Frankie Foye as clients, shares a laundry list of foundations that “melt into the skin and don’t tend to creep into fine lines and wrinkles or accentuate pores.” One of them is this weightless Chanel  pick.
  • More to Know: Formulated with 40% water and light-reflecting pigments, the foundation has a silky, barely there feel and instantly hydrates skin for up to 12 hours.

For Dry Skin

Tom Ford Shade and Illuminate Soft Radiance Foundation SPF 50

Tom Ford Shade and Illuminate Soft Radiance Foundation SPF 50



  • Why We Love It: “This foundation has great coverage and is perfect for those with drier skin types,” says Henney. “The shade range is beautiful, and the packaging is super chic!”
  • More to Know: Tom Ford’s Soft Radiance foundation features a blend of hyaluronic acid, natural oils, and noni fruit extract to condition and calm skin. On the complexion front, light diffusing powders ensure the perfect luminous, medium-to-full-coverage wear.

The Stick Formula

Merit The Minimalist Perfecting Complexion Stick

Merit The Minimalist Perfecting Complexion Stick

  • Why We Love It: If a stick foundation is more your speed, Baraf is a fan of Merit’s lauded complexion stick. It’s especially useful for mess-free application, storing in your makeup bag, or combining the benefits of a foundation and concealer in one.
  • More to Know: Formulated in partnership with esthetician Biba de Sousa, this features a blend of fatty acids and sea daffodil to lock in moisture and minimize the look of dark spots. provide this formula a swipe to test its light-to-medium-coverage wear.

For a Big Event

Shiseido Synchro Skin Radiant Lifting Foundation SPF 30

Shiseido Synchro Skin Radiant Lifting Foundation SPF 30

  • Why We Love It: “I love this foundation for when I’m getting my clients ready for a red carpet or important event,” says Henney. “I use this on my client Vera Wang, and we love how it looks on the skin and in photographs.”
  • More to Know: Get your skin camera-ready with Shiseido’s foundation designed to adjust to your skin’s needs. Featuring a blend of mandarin-peel extract, light-adjusting technology, luminous pearls, and microcrystals, this foundation refines skin texture, reduces the look of hyperpigmentation, and smooths fine lines. The finish is medium-to-full coverage, along with water-, transfer-, and crease-resistant wear.


Clé de Peau Radiant Fluid Foundation

Clé de Peau Radiant Fluid Foundation



  • Why We Love It: In Maye Musk’s installment of Vogue’s Beauty Secrets, she began her makeup routine with Clé de Peau’s Radiant Fluid Foundation. At 73, the model is now partial to more natural-looking makeup, thanks in part to this foundation’s bare-skin-like finish.
  • More to Know: Infused with hyaluronic acid and skin-luminizing properties, this foundation is crafted to enhance your skin’s glow, suppleness, and moisture. Apply it with a sponge, as Musk does, or your preferred brush, for light-to-medium coverage.

The Serum Foundation

Ilia True Skin Serum Foundation

Ilia True Skin Serum Foundation

  • Why We Love It: Dalí-Trites calls Ilia’s her go-to for mature skin because it “adds moisture, gives the skin a healthy natural glow, [and] good amount of coverage while still letting the skin look like skin.
  • More to Know: Think of this as the high-coverage counterpart to its acclaimed Super Serum Skin Tint. Kinjo says it’s “for those who want clean, vegan makeup [that] will keep skin glowing all day.” While niacinamide and allantoin help brighten and soothe skin, this is formulated to counteract the look of pores, redness, and uneven skin tone through its weightless medium-coverage formula.

The Skin Care Hybrid

Sisley Sisleya Le Teint Anti-Aging Foundation

Sisley Sisleya Le Teint Anti-Aging Foundation



  • Why We Love It: “The best foundations use great skin care ingredients,” says Kinjo. “You want ingredients that help collagen production, like my favorite Sisley Paris Sisleÿa Le Teint Anti-Aging Foundation.”
  • More to Know: Persian acacia, chlorella, soy peptide, and white willow extracts are only a few of the ingredients that power Sisley’s light-coverage foundation. While these work to reveal a radiant, supple complexion, mica and powder pigments promote a smooth, even base.

The Matte Finish

Dior Forever Matte Foundation SPF 15

Dior Forever Matte Foundation SPF 15

  • Why We Love It: One may assume that a matte-finish foundation is out of the question, so as to avoid exaggerating the look of skin texture or fine lines. Baraf, however, recommends Dior’s foundation (in the matte or glow variant) as a suitable option.
  • More to Know: Powered by mineral pigments and floral extracts of wild pansy, nasturtium, and iris, Dior’s matte foundation is anything but drying and provides smooth, soft-focus coverage and a nourished complexion.

The Intensive Hydrator

Koh Gen Do Maifanshi Moisture Foundation

Koh Gen Do Maifanshi Moisture Foundation

  • Why We Love It: Those partial to a cream foundation, especially throughout colder temperatures, should consider Koh Gen Do’s Maifanshi Moisture Foundation. Kinjo dubs it a “hydrating formula with great coverage.”
  • More to Know: Despite its creamy texture, it delivers sheer-to-medium wear that moisturizes and blurs skin texture thanks to a blend of mineral pigments, aloe extract, jojoba oil, squalane, and shea butter.

The Tinted Moisturizer

Saie Slip Tint

  • Why We Love It: Not ready to provide up the feel of a warm-weather-favorite tinted moisturizer? Baraf says Saie’s formula is her pick. Sheer, dewy coverage truly never goes out of season.
  • More to Know: The Saie Slip Tint utilizes a blend of hyaluronic acid, pansy flower, and licorice root extract to brighten, hydrate, and protect skin with ease.

Tips for Applying Foundation in an Ageless Makeup Routine

So you’ve discovered your favorite foundation above, but you’re still a bit unsure how to apply it. If we’ve learned anything in accurate years, it’s that your technique makes all the difference.

“A key to looking youthful as we age is avoiding heavy or cakey makeup; less is definitely more here,” says Baraf. “You can use thin layers of product to build in places if need be. Most important is layering your gorgeous skin care underneath your foundation to ensure your foundation melts into your skin and looks fresh.”

To make your foundation look like a second skin, the right moisturizer, primer, and perhaps a glow-boosting serum can be helpful even before applying the foundation. Next, Dalí-Trites says to “mist your foundation brush or sponge with a hydrating face mist; this will help add an extra layer of hydration, allowing the foundation to best glide onto the skin and blend seamlessly.” From there, you can go in with concealer to the undereyes (or wherever else) before applying a light veil of powder—especially to the T-zone and around the mouth. Caution against using too much, though. “If you need to take away some shine, use translucent powder sparingly,” says Kinjo. “Overpowering makes your skin look dry.” And there you have it—a flawless makeup base.

Augustinus Bader The Rich Cream

Chanel Hydra Beauty Essence Mist

Westman Atelier Foundation Brush

Fenty Beauty Precision Makeup Sponge 100

Fri, 30 Sep 2022 04:22:00 -0500 en-US text/html
Killexams : Foundations: 10 of the best

Is your foundation still working for you? Autumn is a good time to take another look. A decently formulated base (because they are not all necessarily called “foundations”, but essentially have the same function) should be good for at least a year to 18 months, but if it’s been stored in a hot room with direct sunlight, it’s no good to anyone. Now most people will automatically replace their old foundation with the same one, which isn’t necessarily a bad thing, but it’s important to remember your skin evolves. You may have acquired a tan this summer so your foundation is unlikely to perfectly match your skin tone. Beyond this, however, depending on a number of factors – skincare, lifestyle, hormones – you may find your skin is more parched, uneven, oilier… The point is, skin isn’t static so, more so than an eyeliner or a lipstick, your foundation will need to work harder to accommodate these changes. The slew of new launches runs the gamut from a tint to full-on coverage, meeting a variety of needs. What they all have in common, however, is that they are created with skincare in mind: brightening, smoothing, serum-like textures and skin-loving ingredients are ubiquitous – which in my book, is essential. So, if your current foundation has no skincare benefits, it is definitely a good time to start looking elsewhere.

1. Fenty Beauty Pro Filt’r Soft Matte Longwear Foundation £45,
2. YSL All Hours Foundation £36,
3. Dior Forever Natural Velvet £47,
4. Charlotte’s Beautiful Skin Foundation £36,
5 . Hourglass Ambient Soft Glow Foundation £46,
6. Guerlain Parure Gold Skin Foundation £64,
7. RMS Beauty ReEvolve Natural Finish Liquid Foundation £46,
8. By Terry Brightening CC Serum £61,
9. Lancôme Teint Idole Ultra Wear Care & Glow £35,
10. Dolce & Gabbana Velvetskin Natural Matte Foundation £51,

Follow Funmi on Twitter @FunmiFetto

Sat, 10 Sep 2022 20:11:00 -0500 Funmi Fetto en text/html
Killexams : The Four Foundations Of Wise Leaders

Dr. Gregory Stebbins is the Founder and Master Coach at PeopleSavvy. He is a member of the American Psychological Association.

Wisdom, it seems, is inherently individualized. Leaders differ in situations, obligations, mental abilities, talents and personality types. A decision, or a value, that may be wise for one person might be a foolish choice for another. According to the University of Chicago Center for Practical Wisdom, “Leadership wisdom is the combined use of awareness, experience, and insight to set direction, empower people, ensure well-being, and guide activity to achieve lasting results.”


On many occasions, our perceptions tell us we are seeing one thing when something different is going on. During these occasions, our perceptions sit behind a veil of our beliefs about the situation or circumstances. Instead of a clear vision, we only see our projected beliefs. And yet, we often determine that what we are seeing is accurate. We’re missing the essence of the situation or circumstances.

Many leaders genuinely think that they can differentiate their settings with absolute precision. In reality, our perceptions are distorted by our projections. We see our world not as it is but through our projections.

Nothing in the world has any meaning except the meaning we provide to it. It's not what is going on but how we perceive what is going on. It's our relationship to it that counts. To be more effective, we must consider our relationship with everyone we interact with. Our relationship to them determines how we perceive the meanings we assign to places, people, institutions and everyday events.

Wise leaders can see the big picture, knowing that everything is contextual. They observe every situation from many different angles. Avoiding simplistic black-and-white thinking allows the leader to put concerns in perspective And, since wise leaders tend to have quiet egos that are not attached to their current views, their descriptive words change when they get new data or shift to a new perspective. Wise leaders have developed skills in managing any negative emotions they may have. Having well-developed empathy and compassion distinguishes them in personal relationships.


The core of authenticity is described as “being yourself.” Which self is that? As a human being, you have multiple dimensions of awareness. The self could be your emotional, mental, physical or perhaps a combination. For example, maybe one part of you is a jerk at work. Another part might be focused on mystical experiences. Who shows up more frequently?

Is your leadership style compatible with who you perceive yourself to be, or is it an imitation of someone else? Are you being pushed to act in ways that are consistent with the organizational culture? It’s not always easy being a leader at work. For example, what obstacles do you encounter that deter you from being open and vulnerable?

Deeply knowing yourself is only part of the wisdom equation. Leading from who you are may change as you deepen your self-understanding. Being authentic with what you know about yourself is only a single step. Regardless of the situation and circumstances, be open and vulnerable about who you are, allowing your freedom to extend to others. Ernst & Young conducted several studies on engagement teams globally. When employees were supported “to be fully themselves” in their work environment, the beneficial byproducts were greater client satisfaction ratings and stronger client retention.


This journey takes time to process the many awarenesses you will have. While each step builds on previous steps, this journey isn’t linear. Repeating previous steps allows you to gain richer awareness and insight. The deeper you go into your understanding of self, the more you may realize how little you know.

Wise leaders learn to be patient with the journey. Sometimes the wisdom journey requires you to do something a second, third or more times. Reflect and review the essence of your choices. Wisdom is rarely a smooth road. Mistaken turns onto the muddy paths of life become treasured because they enable leaders to grow their character.

The wisdom development process benefits us in extending compassion and empathy to our unfoldment, the growth of our organization and our team. Character development and humility are outcomes of developing patience.


One of the most difficult aspects of developing wisdom is leading through change. This is especially true when we are the object of change. Facing our resistance when it’s easier to stay in our comfort zone requires courage.

The root of the word courage is “cor,” which is Latin for "heart." According to Brené Brown, its original meaning is “to speak one’s mind by telling all one’s heart.” Courage is about leading ourselves with empathy and compassion, which leads to personal growth and positive change.

Being courageous requires us to embrace uncertainty. With uncertainty comes risk. By increasing our awareness of our internal worlds and understanding how our awareness shapes our perceptions, we afford ourselves the prospect of taking courageous action.

Courage links to perception, authenticity and patience. Many companies have established a culture of being nice. Sometimes, a wise leader needs to openly disagree with the potential of creating internal stress. When combining courage with perception, authenticity and patience, our internal evolution includes the growth of compassion, deeper engagement and greater personal well-being.

Forbes Coaches Council is an invitation-only community for leading business and career coaches. Do I qualify?

Tue, 20 Sep 2022 23:05:00 -0500 Gregory Stebbins en text/html
Killexams : Adopting An Open Approach To Modernize IT

Rajat Bhargava is an entrepreneur, investor, author and currently CEO and cofounder of JumpCloud.

From the 1980s until the mid-2000s, the monoculture around Microsoft ruled. Users logged into Windows-managed computers and used Office and Windows File Server; businesses relied on Microsoft Active Directory (AD) to manage user identity and access.

Then, IT evolved. On-premises environments and closed systems gave way to the flexibility of the cloud. Organizations adopted Mac- and Linux-based systems. Software as a service (SaaS) environments exploded. Data centers started to be replaced by infrastructure as a service (IaaS) providers. Now, Gartner predicts that over 95% of new digital workloads will be deployed on cloud-native platforms by 2025, a dramatic increase from 30% in 2021.

With cloud servers preferred for data processing and storage, web applications now dominate the market. In part because wired connections gave way to wireless networks and people became more mobile through smartphones, and Google Workspace (aka G Suite, Google Apps) and M365 (aka Office 365) became as popular as machine-based Office applications in the enterprise space.

In this environment, organizations can’t be bound to anachronistic approaches as businesses shift to the cloud and globally distributed workforces. Now’s the time for companies—especially small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs)—to approach IT with an open mind and an open approach.

“Open” in this context doesn’t mean porous or loose; it represents scalability, flexibility and agility in terms of changes in technology and developments in the stack. An open approach improves end user experience, worker productivity and satisfaction. An open approach to IT can be a critical tool in helping organizations establish zero-trust security without sacrificing the agility and flexibility made possible by the cloud.

In this article, I’ll offer some tips to getting started with this approach.

Open Identity

Modernizing IT stacks means making sure that work—remote and hybrid—functions well. Employees care about doing their job; they want easy access to the resources they need. IT teams want a similarly streamlined experience and assurance that company data remains secure without impacting productivity. My company’s survey of 506 SME IT admins found that nearly 75% prefer a single solution to manage employee identities, access and devices than having to manage a number of different solutions. An open directory platform approach incorporates a cloud-hosted “virtual” domain that meets this need, offering the flexibility and security necessary to support modern workplaces.

This means creating an IT environment that consumes identities wherever they live. Not just employee identities but also device identities, allowing your system to be open to receive information from authorized sources anywhere. On the outgoing side, it means creating a single source of user identity that can be propagated out to other devices, other users or to an authorized network.

Identity as a service and cloud directories are vital tools that enable an open approach. Look for those that offer fluidity and the flexibility to change resources any time (for example, from M365 to Google Workspace or vice versa).

Flexible Security Layers

Instead of traditional perimeters, an open approach favors a creation of virtual offices and security perimeters around each employee—and whatever devices they use. Being open doesn’t equate to a cavalier security approach; it’s a way to offer authorized access to resources anywhere that is convenient and tracked for compliance and overall visibility.

Security layers can evolve with each organization’s need and should include:

Identity layer: A cloud directory houses authentication credentials and establishes centralized access control across user identity, admin access, service accounts and machines. Centering identity within a cloud directory allows SME teams to draw a security perimeter around each employee, enabling updates without disruption and providing access to on-prem and cloud-based resources.

Device layer: Most IT environments operate within an ever-evolving state of company-issued, personal and mobile devices running some combination of Mac, Windows or Linux systems. In this complicated device ecosystem, organizations should extend user identity to establish device trust, meaning that a device is known and its user is verified. A mobile device management solution (MDM) is one option that can install a remote agent to handle basics—including multifactor authentication (MFA) and permissions—zero-touch onboarding and remote lock, restart or wipe. Determine the control level you need in your device environment, factoring in options like how you honor employee device choice and how you manage your bring your own device (BYOD) policy.

IT resource layer: In office environments, employees generally use a form of single sign-on (SSO) to log into their desktop at designated workstations and then get instant access to applications and shared files and servers. In remote, hybrid and other modern IT environments, SSO should include everything from SaaS apps to systems, files, infrastructure and shared networks. Some organizations use SSO solely for web-based applications, while some centralize identity and extend it to virtually any IT resource through authentication protocols like LDAP, SAML, OpenID Connect, SSH, RADIUS and REST.

Open Insights

Given security, ongoing monitoring and compliance needs, visibility is critical to an open IT approach. Considering the breadth of access transactions, businesses should look for a holistic solution with broad coverage.

Basic event logging data is table stakes, and IT solutions should include a method for capturing discrete and unique log formats. That includes logs from SSO and from cloud RADIUS for network connection, LDAP and device connections—any log format for resources deployed in your stack.

Because integration requirements make log analysis and management solutions expensive, challenging to implement and difficult for admins managing custom feeds for authentication protocols, consider options that offer a wide range of analysis by enriching raw data. This can be done with a number of other data points, sessionizing the data through post-processing. Such information provides admins with broad insight across their entire IT environment, not just into a particular service or user.

For many organizations, extending closed legacy systems was a necessity. In the age of hybrid and remote work, it’s proving more of a liability than an asset. An open approach allows companies to embrace a diverse, modern IT environment that can keep pace with what users need, keeping them and company data secure at every access point.

Forbes Technology Council is an invitation-only community for world-class CIOs, CTOs and technology executives. Do I qualify?

Thu, 06 Oct 2022 12:00:00 -0500 Rajat Bhargava en text/html
S10-101 exam dump and training guide direct download
Training Exams List