Get 100% marks with P2065-016 real questions and test prep

killexams.com is happy for helping candidates pass the P2065-016 exam with its valid, refreshed and tried P2065-016 brain dumps. We proceed as an educator in your meeting to get ready and breeze through P2065-016 test. Your insight will be incredibly improved by going through our P2065-016 Latest Questions. You will be really prepared for a genuine P2065-016 test. Thats all that we do.

Exam Code: P2065-016 Practice test 2022 by Killexams.com team
IBM IOC Intelligent Transportation Technical Mastery Test v1
IBM Transportation learn
Killexams : IBM Transportation learn - BingNews https://killexams.com/pass4sure/exam-detail/P2065-016 Search results Killexams : IBM Transportation learn - BingNews https://killexams.com/pass4sure/exam-detail/P2065-016 https://killexams.com/exam_list/IBM Killexams : Apple and IBM Unveil First Part of Relationship -- What It Looks Like No result found, try new keyword!Apple and IBM unveil the first benefits of their working ... "The retention app for insurance might be used for learning what your best sellers do," she said. "The customization of these apps ... Thu, 04 Aug 2022 12:00:00 -0500 en-us text/html https://www.thestreet.com/technology/apple-and-ibm-unveil-first-part-of-relationship-what-it-looks-like-12980797 Killexams : Machine Learning Artificial intelligence Market Size from 2022 to 2028

The MarketWatch News Department was not involved in the creation of this content.

Jul 26, 2022 (Reportmines via Comtex) -- Pre and Post Covid is covered and Report Customization is available.

The "Machine Learning Artificial intelligenceMarket research report" profile investigates the company's business structure, operations, important products and services, prospects, locations and subsidiaries, key executives' biographies, and key rivals 2022 to 2028. The revenue trends, profitability, growth, margins and returns, liquidity and leverage, financial condition, and efficiency ratios are all included in this Machine Learning Artificial intelligence Market study. For this study on the Machine Learning Artificial intelligence market, the researchers used modern primary and secondary research approaches and technologies.Here is a list of the best key players Listed in the Machine Learning Artificial intelligence Market report is AIBrain,Amazon,Anki,CloudMinds,Deepmind,Google,Facebook,IBM,Iris AI,Apple,Luminoso,Qualcomm.

The global Machine Learning Artificial intelligence market size is projected to reach multi million by 2028, in comparision to 2021, at unexpected CAGR during 2022-2028 (Ask for demo Report).

Get demo PDF of Machine Learning Artificial intelligence Market Analysis https://www.predictivemarketresearch.com/enquiry/request-sample/1830253

The assembly, revenue, price, market share, and rate of growth of each type are displayed in the Machine Learning Artificial intelligence market industry research report, which is divided into Deep Learning,Natural Language Processing,Machine Vision,Others. The status and outlook for main applications/end users, consumption (sales), market share, and rate of growth for each application, including Automotive & Transportation,Agriculture,Manufacturing,Others, are all included in this Machine Learning Artificial intelligence market research report. North America: United States, Canada, Europe: GermanyFrance, U.K., Italy, Russia,Asia-Pacific: China, Japan, South, India, Australia, China, Indonesia, Thailand, Malaysia, Latin America:Mexico, Brazil, Argentina, Colombia, Middle East & Africa:Turkey, Saudi, Arabia, UAE, Korea is a list of regions covered in the Machine Learning Artificial intelligence Market Report. The report has a page count of 129.

Get demo PDF of Machine Learning Artificial intelligence Market Analysis https://www.predictivemarketresearch.com/enquiry/request-sample/1830253

The top competitors in the Machine Learning Artificial intelligence Market, as highlighted in the report, are:

  • AIBrain
  • Amazon
  • Anki
  • CloudMinds
  • Deepmind
  • Google
  • Facebook
  • IBM
  • Iris AI
  • Apple
  • Luminoso
  • Qualcomm

Purchase this report https://www.predictivemarketresearch.com/purchase/1830253 (Price 4350 USD for a Single-User License)

Market Segmentation

The worldwide Machine Learning Artificial intelligence Market is categorized on Component, Deployment, Application, and Region.

The Machine Learning Artificial intelligence Market Analysis by types is segmented into:

  • Deep Learning
  • Natural Language Processing
  • Machine Vision
  • Others

The Machine Learning Artificial intelligence Market Industry Research by Application is segmented into:

  • Automotive & Transportation
  • Agriculture
  • Manufacturing
  • Others

In terms of Region, the Machine Learning Artificial intelligence Market Players available by Region are:

  • North America:
  • Europe:
    • Germany
    • France
    • U.K.
    • Italy
    • Russia
  • Asia-Pacific:
    • China
    • Japan
    • South Korea
    • India
    • Australia
    • China Taiwan
    • Indonesia
    • Thailand
    • Malaysia
  • Latin America:
    • Mexico
    • Brazil
    • Argentina Korea
    • Colombia
  • Middle East & Africa:
    • Turkey
    • Saudi
    • Arabia
    • UAE
    • Korea

Inquire or Share Your Questions If Any Before the Purchasing This Report https://www.predictivemarketresearch.com/enquiry/pre-order-enquiry/1830253

Key Benefits for Industry Participants & Stakeholders:

Players, stakeholders, and other stakeholders in the Machine Learning Artificial intelligence market industry research will be able to gain an advantage by utilizing the Machine Learning Artificial intelligence market research report as a resource. The global Machine Learning Artificial intelligence market research report's value chain analysis, sales breakdown, and competitive situation are combined with regional-level forecasts.

The Machine Learning Artificial intelligence market research report contains the following TOC:

  • Report Overview
  • Global Growth Trends
  • Competition Landscape by Key Players
  • Data by Type
  • Data by Application
  • North America Market Analysis
  • Europe Market Analysis
  • Asia-Pacific Market Analysis
  • Latin America Market Analysis
  • Middle East & Africa Market Analysis
  • Key Players Profiles Market Analysis
  • Analysts Viewpoints/Conclusions
  • Appendix

Get a demo of TOC https://www.predictivemarketresearch.com/toc/1830253#tableofcontents

Highlights of The Machine Learning Artificial intelligence Market Report

The Machine Learning Artificial intelligence Market Industry Research Report contains:

  • International and domestic market segmentation
  • Major changes in the Machine Learning Artificial intelligence market research structure
  • Regional and country-level competitive analysis
  • The Machine Learning Artificial intelligence market share, size, and growth comprehension analysis
  • The most common growth strategies employed by business owners

Purchase this report https://www.predictivemarketresearch.com/purchase/1830253 (Price 4350 USD for a Single-User License)

COVID 19 Impact Analysis:

The Machine Learning Artificial intelligence market industry trend segmentation is based on various characteristics such as kinds, applications, and regions. In addition, the Machine Learning Artificial intelligence market research report evaluates the impact of the new COVID-19 pandemic on the Machine Learning Artificial intelligence market research and provides a unique assessment of the predicted market changes during the forecasted time frame. Machine Learning Artificial intelligence Market Share, Stock Determinations and Figures, contact information, Sales, Capacity, Production, Price, Cost, Revenue, and Business Profiles are all encased within the Machine Learning Artificial intelligence market report. Over the forecast period, the Machine Learning Artificial intelligence market research report comprises market segmentation, competitive analysis, and regional study.

Get Covid-19 Impact Analysis for Machine Learning Artificial intelligence Market research report https://www.predictivemarketresearch.com/enquiry/request-covid19/1830253

Machine Learning Artificial intelligence Market Size and Industry Challenges:

The Machine Learning Artificial intelligence market research report includes Company Profile, Product Specifications, Revenue, Price, and Gross Margin Sales, as well as a comprehensive analysis of the market competitive landscape and detailed information on vendors, as well as comprehensive details of factors that will challenge the growth of major market vendors.

Get demo PDF of Machine Learning Artificial intelligence Market Analysis https://www.predictivemarketresearch.com/enquiry/request-sample/1830253

Reasons to Purchase the Machine Learning Artificial intelligence Market Report:

  • Identify rising players with potentially strong product portfolios in Machine Learning Artificial intelligence market research.
  • develop effective counter-strategies to acquire a competitive edge.
  • Tactical initiatives were formed by knowing the focus areas of prominent organizations, which helped to plan mergers and acquisitions more effectively.

Purchase this report https://www.predictivemarketresearch.com/purchase/1830253 (Price 4350 USD for a Single-User License)

Contact Us:

Name: Aniket Tiwari

Email: sales@predictivemarketresearch.com

Phone: USA:+1 917 267 7384 / IN:+91 777 709 3097

Website: https://www.predictivemarketresearch.com/

Report Published by: Predictive Market Research

More Reports Published By Us:

Global and United States Heavy Punching Bag Market Report & Forecast 2022-2028

Global and United States Speed Punching Bag Market Report & Forecast 2022-2028

Global and United States Uppercut Punching Bag Market Report & Forecast 2022-2028

Global and United States Double-ended Punching Bag Market Report & Forecast 2022-2028

Source: QYR

Press Release Distributed by Lemon PR Wire

To view the original version on Lemon PR Wire visit Machine Learning Artificial intelligence Market Size from 2022 to 2028

COMTEX_410963927/2788/2022-07-26T02:00:44

The MarketWatch News Department was not involved in the creation of this content.

Mon, 25 Jul 2022 18:00:00 -0500 en-US text/html https://www.marketwatch.com/press-release/machine-learning-artificial-intelligence-market-size-from-2022-to-2028-2022-07-26
Killexams : IBM 1401

Siglent has been making pretty big inroads into the mid-range test equipment market, with the manufacturers instruments popping up on benches all over the place. Saulius Lukse, of Kurokesu fame, found himself in possession of a Siglent SPD3303X programmable power supply, which looks like a really nice unit, at least from the hardware side. The software it came with didn’t exactly light his fire, though, so Saulius came up with a Python library to control the power supply. The library lets him control pretty much every aspect of the power supply over its Ethernet port. There are still a few functions that don’t quite work, and he’s only tested it with his specific power supply so far, but chances are pretty good that there’s at least some crossover in the command sets for other Siglent instruments. We’re keen to see others pick this up and run with it.

From the “everyone needs a hobby” department, we found this ultra-detailed miniature of an IBM 1401 mainframe system to be completely enthralling. We may have written this up at an earlier point in its development, but it now appears that the model maker, 6502b, is done with the whole set, so it bears another look. The level of detail is eye-popping — the smallest features of every piece of equipment, from the operator’s console to the line printer, is reproduced . Even the three-ring binders with system documentation are there. And don’t get us started about those tape drives, or the wee chair in period-correct Harvest Gold.

Speaking of diversions, have you ever wondered how many people are in space right now? Or how many humans have had the privilege to hitch a ride upstairs? There’s a database for that: the Astronauts Database over on Supercluster. It lists pretty much everything — human and non-human — that has been intentionally launched into space, starting with Yuri Gagarin in 1961 and up to the latest member of the club, Sergey Kud-Sverchkov, who took off got the ISS just last week from his hometown of Baikonur. Everyone and everything is there, including “some tardigrades” that crashed into the Moon. They even included this guy, which makes us wonder why they didn’t include the infamous manhole cover.

And finally, for the machinists out there, if you’ve ever wondered what chatter looks like, wonder no more. Breaking Taps has done an interesting slow-motion analysis of endmill chatter, and the results are a bit unexpected. The footage is really cool — watching the four-flute endmill peel mild steel off and fling the tiny curlicues aside is very satisfying. The value of the high-speed shots is evident when he induces chatter; the spindle, workpiece, vise, and just about everything starts oscillating, resulting in a poor-quality cut and eventually, when pushed beyond its limits, the dramatic end of the endmill’s life. Interesting stuff — reminds us a bit of Ben Krasnow’s up close and personal look at chip formation in his electron microscope.

Mon, 25 Jul 2022 12:00:00 -0500 en-US text/html https://hackaday.com/tag/ibm-1401/
Killexams : Zero trust: Chaos creates cybercriminal opportunities

If there is any word to best describe the first few years of the decade, it is chaotic. And chaos is where cybercriminals flourish. While many fleets and other transportation industry organizations and businesses are more secure than last decade, there are more threats to the industry, which could impact fleets, their customers, and supply chains.

In the past year, the transportation industry was among the top 10 most targeted sectors by cybercriminals, according to a 2022 IBM Security study. While transportation was the seventh-most cyberattack-targeted industry, industries relying on trucking and other transportation services, such as manufacturing (No. 1), energy (No. 4), and retail/wholesale (No. 5), were victims of ransomware and business email compromise (BEC) attacks, according to the study.

See also: Still waiting on blockchain to catch up with the hype

These attacks, particularly against manufacturing, which accounted for nearly a quarter of all cyberattacks worldwide in 2021, added to the supply chain pressures created during the COVID-19 pandemic.

"Cybercriminals usually chase the money. Now with ransomware, they are chasing leverage," said Charles Henderson, head of IBM X-Force. "Businesses should recognize that vulnerabilities are holding them in a deadlock—as ransomware actors use that to their advantage. This is a non-binary challenge. The attack surface is only growing larger, so instead of operating under the assumption that every vulnerability in their environment has been patched, businesses should operate under an assumption of compromise and enhance their vulnerability management with a zero trust strategy."

Joe Russo, VP of IT and Security at Isaac Instruments, a trucking technology company, said more companies are shifting toward “zero-trust.” It’s a new security approach that assumes a breach has already happened—so it increases the difficulty for an attacker to move through a company’s network.

“Zero trust is something that can help all fleets,” Russo told FleetOwner. Fundamentally, zero trust is understanding where critical data resides and who has access to it. It’s one of the bases for blockchain. Then, he explained, fleets should create robust verification measures throughout a network to ensure only the right people are accessing that crucial data in the right way.

Transportation industry security improves

IBM’s study found that 4% of all attacks were aimed at the transportation industry, which made it the seventh-most targeted group in 2021. Transportation was No. 9 in 2020. IBM found that as international borders and transportation networks reopened in 2021, it renewed cybercriminal interest in transportation. While transportation ranked lower overall in 2020, it saw more cyberattacks. 

The transportation industry had already started taking cyber issues more seriously last year, according to Ben Barnes, chief information security officer and VP of IT services for transportation solutions provider McLeod Software

See also: How to reduce the risk of a data breach

“I think we, as an industry, have come a long way in our cybersecurity,” he told FleetOwner. “A lack of cyber adoption was our big hurdle for a long time. I don’t think we suffer that anymore.”

While the transportation industry was once the “low-hanging fruit” for cybercriminals, that is no longer the case, Barnes said. “I think a lot of the attacks in the transportation industry now are very targeted. It’s a high-value market now,” he explained. “High value doesn’t mean profitable, but there’s a lot of revenue; there’s a lot of dollars in transportation that are moving. And that makes us very likable for a thief.”

Malicious insiders—those who intentionally abuse legitimate credentials to steal information—was the top attack type against transportation organizations in 2021, according to the IBM study. These attacks made up 29% of those in the industry. Ransomware, remote access trojans (RATs), data theft, credential harvesting, and server access were also aimed at transportation organizations.

Half of the incidents IBM X-Force remediated at transportation companies originated with phishing emails, followed by stolen credentials (33%), and vulnerability exploitation (17%).

Russo noted that during the pandemic, as more companies were dealing with remote workers and more entry points for attacks, cybersecurity technologies improved. “If there’s a ransomware attack, it can be isolated to just that device so it doesn’t spread,” he explained. “A lot more proactive and containment is happening than in the past.”

Transportation targets

While transportation is no longer one of the top five targets for cybercriminals, it’s no reason for fleets and similar businesses to rest, Russo said. 

“With the Russian war in Ukraine, hackers are going after high-value targets, such as financial systems and health care,” Russo explained. “They haven’t gone down the list yet and hit transportation. But everyone must be vigilant—it could hit anytime.” 

See also: Are cybercriminals waiting for an opportune time to attack U.S. trucks?

When the fragility of U.S. supply chains was exposed during the COVID pandemic, cybercriminals were also shown how attacks could affect specific transportation organizations and businesses such as fleets, according to John Sheehy, SVP of research and strategy for IOActive

“You might be attacked because of who your client is—or who their client is,” Sheehy told FleetOwner. He explained that a criminal looking to infiltrate a high-value target could use a fleet’s weaker cybersecurity as a way to get into a fleet customer’s network. That’s why he believes sharing information about company security breaches can contribute to the common good.

“Empowering them with the information they need to make decisions to protect themselves and their clients is very helpful,” Sheehy said.

Cyberattacks aren’t going away, McLeod’s Barnes said. And like all business practices, companies need to review and revisit their cybersecurity practices regularly. 

“We’re all targets because we’re all part of the transportation sector—but there is strength in collective action,” he said. The transportation industry needs to work together to combat cybercrime. As more companies take steps to protect their IT systems, the transportation sector will become a less attractive target for cybercriminals. If we can raise awareness and take action to defeat cybercrime, the entire industry will benefit.”

Thu, 04 Aug 2022 02:51:00 -0500 text/html https://www.fleetowner.com/technology/article/21246668/chaos-creates-cybercriminal-opportunities
Killexams : Emulating The IBM PC On An ESP32

The IBM PC spawned the basic architecture that grew into the dominant Wintel platform we know today. Once heavy, cumbersome and power thirsty, it’s a machine that you can now emulate on a single board with a cheap commodity microcontroller. That’s thanks to work from [Fabrizio Di Vittorio], who has shared a how-to on Youtube. 

The full playlist is quite something to watch, showing off a huge number of old-school PC applications and games running on the platform. There’s QBASIC, FreeDOS, Windows 3.0, and yes, of course, Flight Simulator. The latter game was actually considered somewhat of a de facto standard for PC compatibility in the 1980s, so the fact that the ESP32 can run it with [Fabrizio’s] code suggests he’s done well.

It’s amazingly complete, with the ESP32 handling everything from audio and video to sound output and keyboard and mouse inputs. It’s a testament to the capability of modern microcontrollers that this is such a simple feat in 2021.

We’ve seen the ESP32 emulate 8-bit gaming systems before, too. If you remember [Fabrizio’s] name, it’s probably from his excellent FabGL library. Videos after the break.

Thu, 04 Aug 2022 12:00:00 -0500 Lewin Day en-US text/html https://hackaday.com/2021/07/28/emulating-the-ibm-pc-on-an-esp32/
Killexams : IBM report shows healthcare has a growing cybersecurity gap

Were you unable to attend Transform 2022? Check out all of the summit sessions in our on-demand library now! Watch here.


While enterprises are setting records in cybersecurity spending, the cost and severity of breaches continue to soar. IBM’s latest data breach report provides insights into why there’s a growing disconnect between enterprise spending on cybersecurity and record costs for data breaches. 

This year, 2022, is on pace to be a record-breaking year for enterprise breaches globally, with the average cost of a data breach reaching $4.35 million. That’s 12.7% higher than the average cost of a data breach in 2020, which was $3.86 million. It also found a record 83% of enterprises reporting more than one breach and that the average time to identify a breach is 277 days. As a result, enterprises need to look at their cybersecurity tech stacks to see where the gaps are and what can be improved.  

Enhanced security around privileged access credentials and identity management is an excellent first place to start. More enterprises need to define identities as their new security perimeter. IBM’s study found that 19% of all breaches begin with compromised privileged credentials. Breaches caused by compromised credentials lasted an average of 327 days. Privileged access credentials are also bestsellers on the Dark Web, with high demand for access to financial services’ IT infrastructure.  

The study also shows how dependent enterprises remain on implicit trust across their security and broader IT infrastructure tech stacks. The gaps in cloud security, identity and access management (IAM) and privileged access management (PAM) allow expensive breaches to happen. Seventy-nine percent of critical infrastructure organizations didn’t deploy a zero-trust architecture, when zero trust can reduce average breach losses by nearly $1 million. 

Enterprises need to treat implicit trust as the unlocked back door that allows cybercriminals access to their systems, credentials and most valuable confidential data to reduce the incidence of breaches. 

What enterprises can learn from IBM’s data on healthcare breaches 

The report quantifies how wide healthcare’s cybersecurity gap is growing. IBM’s report estimates the average cost of a healthcare data breach is now $10.1 million, a record and nearly $1 million over last year’s $9.23 million. Healthcare has had the highest average breach cost for twelve consecutive years, increasing 41.6% since 2020. 

The findings suggest that the skyrocketing cost of breaches adds inflationary fuel to the fire, as runaway prices are financially squeezing global consumers and companies. Sixty percent of organizations participating in IBM’s study say, they raised their product and service prices due to the breach, as supply chain disruptions, the war in Ukraine and tepid demand for products continue. Consumers are already struggling to meet healthcare costs, which will likely increase by 6.5% next year

The study also found that nearly 30% of breach costs are incurred 12 to 24 months after, translating into permanent price increases for consumers. 

“It is clear that cyberattacks are evolving into market stressors that are triggering chain reactions, [and] we see that these breaches are contributing to those inflationary pressures,” says John Hendley, head of strategy for IBM Security’s X-Force research team.  

Getting quick wins in encryption

For healthcare providers with limited cybersecurity budgets, prioritizing these three areas can reduce the cost of a breach while making progress toward zero-trust initiatives. Getting identity access management (IAM) right is core to a practical zero-trust framework, one that can quickly adapt and protect human and machine identities are essential. IBM’s study found that of the zero-trust components measured in the study, IAM is the most effective in reducing breach costs. Leading IAM includes Akamai, Fortinet, Ericom, Ivanti, Palo Alto Networks and others. Ericom’s ZTEdge platform is noteworthy for its combining ML-enabled identity and access management, zero-trust network access (ZTNA), microsegmentation and secure web gateway (SWG) with remote browser isolation (RBI) and Web Application Isolation.

VentureBeat's mission is to be a digital town square for technical decision-makers to gain knowledge about transformative enterprise technology and transact. Learn more about membership.

Mon, 01 Aug 2022 09:21:00 -0500 Louis Columbus en-US text/html https://venturebeat.com/2022/08/01/ibm-report-shows-healthcare-has-a-growing-cybersecurity-gap/
Killexams : Average cost of data breaches hits record high of $4.35 million: IBM

The global average cost of data breaches reached an all-time high of $4.35 million in 2022 compared with $4.24 million in 2021, according to a new IBM Security report. About 60% of the breached organizations raised product and services prices due to the breaches.

The annual report, conducted by Ponemon Institute and analyzed and sponsored by IBM Security, is based on the analysis of real-world data breaches experienced by 550 organizations globally between March 2021 and March 2022. 

According to the report, about 83% of the organizations have experienced more than one breach in their lifetime, with nearly half of the costs reported to be incurred more than a year after the breach.

Cloud and critical infrastructure remain at high risk

The report revealed that ransomware and destructive attacks represented 28% of breaches among critical infrastructure organizations studied, indicating threat actors specifically targeting the sector for disrupting global supply chain. The critical infrastructure sector includes financial services, industrial, transportation, and healthcare companies.

The report also noted that in the US, even a year after the Biden administration issued a cybersecurity executive order mandating federal agencies to adopt a zero-trust security model, only 21% of critical infrastructure organizations surveyed have done so, raising costs by $1.17 million for those who did not. Seventeen percent of the critical infrastructure breaches were caused due to a business partner being initially compromised.

Cloud computing infrastructure is an even easier target because of the security immaturity it suffers, according to the report. “Forty-three percent of studied organizations are in the early stages or have not started applying security practices across their cloud environments, observing over $660,000 on average in higher breach costs than studied organizations with mature security across their cloud environments,” it added.

Copyright © 2022 IDG Communications, Inc.

Thu, 04 Aug 2022 03:42:00 -0500 en text/html https://www.csoonline.com/article/3668655/average-cost-of-data-breaches-hits-record-high-of-435-million-ibm.html
Killexams : Blockchain Technology in Healthcare Market to Develop New Growth Story | Top Manufacturers like IBM, Gem, PokitDok, Medicalchain, Chronicled, etc.

Blockchain Technology in Healthcare Market gives the comprehensive study of the industry size and share, detailed information from different sources. The experts have given the different features of the market by distinguishing the key industry Influencers, value chain analysis, market segmentation by mode of transportation, geographic landscape and SWOT analysis.

“Final Report will add the analysis of the impact of COVID-19 on this industry.”

The global current market size estimation, market scenario, structure, products, top industry players, segmentation by types, and applications are all included in the “Blockchain Technology in Healthcare Market” research report. The Blockchain Technology in Healthcare market study focuses on the factors that are important to the market and could have a big impact on its future development. The research also provides information on the market’s constraints and most recent developments, as well as the factors that promote growth. Studies by Blockchain Technology in Healthcare Market Report examine how COVID-19 has affected the industry’s upstream, midstream, and downstream segments. Additionally, by emphasizing data on several elements that involve market dynamics, such as market drivers, market barriers, market opportunities, market risks, and industry, this analysis delivers comprehensive market estimations.

Get a demo Copy of the report @ https://www.kingpinmarketresearch.com/enquiry/request-sample/21236294

Summary of Blockchain Technology in Healthcare Market:

Blockchain Technology in Healthcare is an effective technology that can help prevent data breaches in the healthcare industry. It is a secure and reliable method of recording, storing, and sharing sensitive data.
The Blockchain Technology in Healthcare market has witnessed a growth from USD million to USD million from 2017 to 2022. With a CAGR, this market is estimated to reach USD million in 2029.

The report focuses on the Blockchain Technology in Healthcare market size, segment size (mainly covering product type, application, and geography), competitor landscape, recent status, and development trends. Furthermore, the report provides strategies for companies to overcome threats posed by COVID-19.

Technological innovation and advancement will further optimize the performance of the product, enabling it to acquire a wider range of applications in the downstream market. Moreover, customer preference analysis, market dynamics (drivers, restraints, opportunities), new product release, impact of COVID-19, regional conflicts and carbon neutrality provide crucial information for us to take a deep dive into the Blockchain Technology in Healthcare market.

Blockchain Technology in Healthcare Market Competitive Analysis:
Competitive analysis is useful because they provide a thorough insight of the Blockchain Technology in Healthcare market and industry’s rivalry. You may learn about what is working in your sector, which of your competitors you should attempt to keep up with and surpass, and how to stand out from the crowd. It also includes a competitive analysis of their market share, profits, opportunities, and difficulties.

Key Manufacturers are:

  • IBM
  • Gem
  • PokitDok
  • Medicalchain
  • Chronicled
  • Microsoft
  • iSolve
  • Factom
  • Blockpharma
  • SimplyVital Health
  • Proof.Work
  • FarmaTrust
  • Patientory
  • Hashed Health
  • Guardtime

COVID-19 sickness began to spread all over the world at the beginning of 2021, infecting countless individuals in general, and important governments all over the world-imposed foot restrictions and work stoppage orders. Aside from the clinical supplies and life support items organizations, most endeavours have been significantly impacted.

To Understand How Covid-19 Impact Is Covered in This Report – https://www.kingpinmarketresearch.com/enquiry/request-covid19/21236294

Blockchain Technology in Healthcare Market Segmentation:

Using Blockchain Technology in Healthcare Market Segmentation Research, you can divide the Blockchain Technology in Healthcare industry into different categories based on types, applications and geographies.

Based on types, the Blockchain Technology in Healthcare market from 2017 to 2029 is primarily split into:

  • Supply Chain Management
  • Clinical Data Exchange and Interoperability
  • Claims Adjudication and Billing Management
  • Other Applications

Based on applications, the Blockchain Technology in Healthcare market from 2017 to 2029 covers:

  • Pharmaceutical Companies
  • Healthcare Players
  • Other End Users

Enquire before purchasing this reporthttps://www.kingpinmarketresearch.com/enquiry/pre-order-enquiry/21236294

Geographically, the report includes the research on production, consumption, revenue, market share and growth rate, and forecast (2017 -2029) of the following regions:

  • United States
  • Europe (Germany, UK, France, Italy, Spain, Russia, Poland)
  • China
  • Japan
  • India
  • Southeast Asia (Malaysia, Singapore, Philippines, Indonesia, Thailand, Vietnam)
  • Latin America (Brazil, Mexico, Colombia)
  • Middle East and Africa (Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Turkey, Egypt, South Africa, Nigeria)
  • Other Regions

Years considered for this report:

  • Historical Years: 2017-2021
  • Base Year: 2021
  • Estimated Year: 2022
  • Forecast Period: 2022-2029

Purchase this report (Price 3450 USD for a single-user license)https://www.kingpinmarketresearch.com/purchase/21236294

Queries Resolved in Keyword report :

  • What will the Keyword market size in 2029 and what will the growth rate?
  • What are the key Keyword market trends?
  • What is driving Global Keyword Market?
  • What are the challenges to Keyword market growth?
  • Who are the key vendors in Global Keyword Market space?
  • What are the key Keyword market trends impacting the growth of the Global Keyword Market?
  • What are the key outcomes of the five forces analysis of the Global Keyword Market?
  • What are the Keyword market opportunities and threats faced by the vendors in the Global Keyword market?

Major chapters covered in Blockchain Technology in Healthcare Market Research are:

  • Chapter 1 provides an overview of Blockchain Technology in Healthcare market, containing global revenue and CAGR. The forecast and analysis of Blockchain Technology in Healthcare market by type, application, and region are also presented in this chapter.
  • Chapter 2 is about the market landscape and major players. It provides competitive situation and market concentration status along with the basic information of these players.
  • Chapter 3 introduces the industrial chain of Blockchain Technology in Healthcare. Industrial chain analysis, raw material (suppliers, price, supply and demand, market concentration rate) and downstream buyers are analysed in this chapter.
  • Chapter 4 concentrates on manufacturing analysis, including cost structure analysis and process analysis, making up a comprehensive analysis of manufacturing cost.
  • Chapter 5 provides clear insights into market dynamics, the influence of COVID-19 in Blockchain Technology in Healthcare industry, consumer behaviour analysis.
  • Chapter 6 provides a full-scale analysis of major players in Blockchain Technology in Healthcare industry. The basic information, as well as the profiles, applications and specifications of products market performance along with Business Overview are offered.
  • Chapter 7 pays attention to the sales, revenue, price and gross margin of Blockchain Technology in Healthcare in markets of different regions. The analysis on sales, revenue, price and gross margin of the global market is covered in this part.
  • Chapter 8 gives a worldwide view of Blockchain Technology in Healthcare market. It includes sales, revenue, price, market share and the growth rate by type.
  • Chapter 9 focuses on the application of Blockchain Technology in Healthcare, by analysing the consumption and its growth rate of each application.
  • Chapter 10 prospects the whole Blockchain Technology in Healthcare market, including the global sales and revenue forecast, regional forecast. It also foresees the Blockchain Technology in Healthcare market by type and application.

This statistical surveying report offers a broad perspective on the Blockchain Technology in Healthcare on a global scale, presenting a figure and measurements in terms of income during the estimated time period. It includes an illustrated review with detailed division, a thorough history of innovative work, and the most recent news. Furthermore, it illustrates future prospects as well as a sketch of the key players involved in the Blockchain Technology in Healthcare Market’s income development.

Detailed TOC of Global Blockchain Technology in Healthcare Market @ https://www.kingpinmarketresearch.com/TOC/21236294

Detailed TOC of Global Blockchain Technology in Healthcare Market Research Report 2022 – Market Size, Current Insights and Development Trends

Table of Content

1 Blockchain Technology in Healthcare Market Overview
1.1 Product Overview and Scope of Blockchain Technology in Healthcare
1.2 Blockchain Technology in Healthcare Segment by Type
1.3 Global Blockchain Technology in Healthcare Segment by Application
1.4 Global Blockchain Technology in Healthcare Market, Region Wise (2017-2022)
1.4.1 Global Blockchain Technology in Healthcare Market Size (Revenue) and CAGR (%) Comparison by Region (2017-2022)
1.4.2 United States Blockchain Technology in Healthcare Market Status and Prospect (2017-2022)
1.4.3 Europe Blockchain Technology in Healthcare Market Status and Prospect (2017-2022)
1.4.4 China Blockchain Technology in Healthcare Market Status and Prospect (2017-2022)
1.4.5 Japan Blockchain Technology in Healthcare Market Status and Prospect (2017-2022)
1.4.6 India Blockchain Technology in Healthcare Market Status and Prospect (2017-2022)
1.4.7 Southeast Asia Blockchain Technology in Healthcare Market Status and Prospect (2017-2022)
1.4.8 Latin America Blockchain Technology in Healthcare Market Status and Prospect (2017-2022)
1.4.9 Middle East and Africa Blockchain Technology in Healthcare Market Status and Prospect (2017-2022)
1.5 Global Market Size of Blockchain Technology in Healthcare (2017-2029)
1.5.1 Global Blockchain Technology in Healthcare Revenue Status and Outlook (2017-2029)
1.5.2 Global Blockchain Technology in Healthcare Sales Status and Outlook (2017-2029)

2 Global Blockchain Technology in Healthcare Market Landscape by Player
2.1 Global Blockchain Technology in Healthcare Sales and Share by Player (2017-2022)
2.2 Global Blockchain Technology in Healthcare Revenue and Market Share by Player (2017-2022)
2.3 Global Blockchain Technology in Healthcare Average Price by Player (2017-2022)
2.4 Global Blockchain Technology in Healthcare Gross Margin by Player (2017-2022)
2.5 Blockchain Technology in Healthcare Manufacturing Base Distribution, Sales Area and Product Type by Player
2.6 Blockchain Technology in Healthcare Market Competitive Situation and Trends
2.6.1 Blockchain Technology in Healthcare Market Concentration Rate
2.6.2 Blockchain Technology in Healthcare Market Share of Top 3 and Top 6 Players
2.6.3 Mergers and Acquisitions, Expansion

3 Blockchain Technology in Healthcare Upstream and Downstream Analysis
3.1 Blockchain Technology in Healthcare Industrial Chain Analysis
3.2 Key Raw Materials Suppliers and Price Analysis
3.3 Key Raw Materials Supply and Demand Analysis
3.4 Manufacturing Process Analysis
3.5 Market Concentration Rate of Raw Materials
3.6 Downstream Buyers
3.7 Value Chain Status Under COVID-19

4 Blockchain Technology in Healthcare Manufacturing Cost Analysis
4.1 Manufacturing Cost Structure Analysis
4.2 Blockchain Technology in Healthcare Key Raw Materials Cost Analysis
4.3 Labor Cost Analysis
4.4 Energy Costs Analysis
4.5 RandD Costs Analysis

5 Market Dynamics
5.1 Drivers
5.2 Restraints and Challenges
5.3 Opportunities
5.4 Blockchain Technology in Healthcare Industry Development Trends under COVID-19 Outbreak
5.5 Consumer Behavior Analysis

6 Players Profiles

7 Global Blockchain Technology in Healthcare Sales and Revenue Region Wise (2017-2022)
7.1 Global Blockchain Technology in Healthcare Sales and Market Share, Region Wise (2017-2022)
7.2 Global Blockchain Technology in Healthcare Revenue (Revenue) and Market Share, Region Wise (2017-2022)
7.3 Global Blockchain Technology in Healthcare Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2017-2022)

8 Global Blockchain Technology in Healthcare Sales, Revenue (Revenue), Price Trend by Type
8.1 Global Blockchain Technology in Healthcare Sales and Market Share by Type (2017-2022)
8.2 Global Blockchain Technology in Healthcare Revenue and Market Share by Type (2017-2022)
8.3 Global Blockchain Technology in Healthcare Price by Type (2017-2022)
8.4 Global Blockchain Technology in Healthcare Sales Growth Rate by Type (2017-2022)

9 Global Blockchain Technology in Healthcare Market Analysis by Application
9.1 Global Blockchain Technology in Healthcare Consumption and Market Share by Application (2017-2022)
9.2 Global Blockchain Technology in Healthcare Consumption Growth Rate by Application (2017-2022)

10 Global Blockchain Technology in Healthcare Market Forecast (2022-2029)
10.1 Global Blockchain Technology in Healthcare Sales, Revenue Forecast (2022-2029)
10.2 Global Blockchain Technology in Healthcare Sales and Revenue Forecast, Region Wise (2022-2029))
10.3 Global Blockchain Technology in Healthcare Sales, Revenue and Price Forecast by Type (2022-2029)
10.4 Global Blockchain Technology in Healthcare Consumption Forecast by Application (2022-2029)
10.5 Blockchain Technology in Healthcare Market Forecast Under COVID-19

11 Research Findings and Conclusion
12 Appendix

About Us:

Market is changing rapidly with the ongoing expansion of the industry. Advancement in the technology has provided today’s businesses with multifaceted advantages resulting in daily economic shifts. Thus, it is very important for a company to comprehend the patterns of the market movements in order to strategize better. An efficient strategy offers the companies with a head start in planning and an edge over the competitors. Kingpin Market Research is the credible source for gaining the market reports that will provide you with the lead your business needs.

Contact Us:

Kingpin Market Research

Phone: US +1 424 253 0807

UK +44 203 239 8187

Email: [email protected]

Web: https://www.kingpinmarketresearch.com

Press Release Distributed by The Express Wire

To view the original version on The Express Wire visit Blockchain Technology in Healthcare Market to Develop New Growth Story | Top Manufacturers like IBM, Gem, PokitDok, Medicalchain, Chronicled, etc.

Tue, 02 Aug 2022 23:10:00 -0500 TheExpressWire en-US text/html https://www.digitaljournal.com/pr/blockchain-technology-in-healthcare-market-to-develop-new-growth-story-top-manufacturers-like-ibm-gem-pokitdok-medicalchain-chronicled-etc
Killexams : IBM’s Cost of a Data Breach Report finds invisible ‘cyber tax’

Were you unable to attend Transform 2022? Check out all of the summit sessions in our on-demand library now! Watch here.


When it comes to operational challenges, few mistakes are as costly as data breaches. Just one exploited vulnerability can lead to millions in damages, not just due to upfront disruption, but a loss of respect from consumers and potential compliance liabilities. 

Unfortunately, the cost of a data breach is only going up. Today, IBM Security released its annual “Cost of a Data Breach” report conducted by Ponemon Institute, which found that the cost of a data breach in 2022 totaled $4.35 million, an increase of 2.6% since last year’s total of $4.24 million. 

The research also found that organizations that fell victim to cyberattacks were prime target for follow-up attacks as part of a “haunting effect”, with 83% of organizations studied having had more than one data breach. 

For enterprises, the report highlights that new approaches are required to mitigate the impact of data breaches, particularly in the face of a growing number of sophisticated attacks, which can’t always be prevented. 

The hostile reality of the threat landscape 

As the cost of a data breach continues to rise amid a threat landscape of rampant double and triple extortion ransomware attacks and identity-related breaches, it’s becoming increasingly clear that traditional approaches to enterprise security need to be reevaluated. 

In the last week alone, T Mobile and Twitter found out the cost of a data breach first hand with the former agreeing to pay customers $350 million as part of a post-breach settlement, and the latter having to deal with the negative fallout after a hacker claimed to have accessed data on 5.4 million users. 

With the impact of such breaches causing millions in damage, many organizations decide to pass costs onto consumers, as part of an invisible cyber tax. In fact, IBM found that for 60% of organizations, breaches led to price increases passed on to customers. 

“What stands out most in this year’s finding is that the financial impact of breaches is now extending well beyond the breaches organizations themselves,” said Head of Strategy, IBM Security X-Force, John Hendley. 

“The cost is trickling down to consumers. In fact, if you consider that two or three companies within a supply chain may have suffered a breach and increased their prices, there’s this multiplier effect that’s ultimately hitting the consumer’s wallet. Essentially, we’re now beginning to see a hidden “cyber tax” that individuals are paying as a result of the growing number of breaches occurring today compounded with the more obvious disruptive effects of cyberattacks,” Hendley said. 

When asked why the cost of data breaches continued to grow, Hendley explained that there’s a high volume of attacks occurring, but only a limited number of skilled security professionals available to respond to them.

This is highlighted in the research with 62% of organizations saying they weren’t sufficiently staffed to meet their security needs.

What are the implications for CISOs and security leaders 

Although the report highlights the bleakest of the current threat landscape, it also points to some promising technologies and methodologies that enterprises can use to reduce the cost of data breaches. 

For instance, one of the most promising findings was that organizations with fully deployed security AI and automation can expect to pay $3.05 million less during a data breach, and on average cut the time to identify and contain a breach by 74-days. 

At the same time, organizations that implement zero trust can expect to pay 1 million less in breach costs than those that don’t. 

Finally, those organizations maintain an incident response team and regularly tested IR plans can expect to cut the cost by $2.66 million.

VentureBeat's mission is to be a digital town square for technical decision-makers to gain knowledge about transformative enterprise technology and transact. Learn more about membership.

Tue, 26 Jul 2022 20:58:00 -0500 Tim Keary en-US text/html https://venturebeat.com/2022/07/26/cost-of-a-data-breach/
Killexams : Cybersecurity - what’s the real cost? Ask IBM
(Pixabay)

Cybersecurity has always been a concern for every type of organization. Even in normal times, a major breach is more than just the data economy’s equivalent of a ram-raid on Fort Knox; it has knock-on effects on trust, reputation, confidence, and the viability of some technologies. This is what IBM calls the “haunting effect”.

A successful attack breeds more, of course, both on the same organization again, and on others in similar businesses, or in those that use the same compromised systems. The unspoken effect of this is rising costs for everyone, as all enterprises are forced to spend money and time on checking if they have been affected too.

But in our new world of COVID-19, disrupted economies, climate change, remote working, soaring inflation, and looming recession, all such effects are all amplified. Throw in a war that’s hammering on Europe’s door (with political echoes across the Middle East and Asia) and it’s a wonder any of us can get out of bed in the morning.

So, what are the real costs of a successful cyberattack – not just hacks, viruses, and Trojans, but also phishing, ransomware, and concerted campaigns against supply chains and code repositories?

According to IBM’s latest annual survey, breach costs have risen by an unlucky 13% over the past two years, as attackers, which include hostile states, have probed the systemic and operational weaknesses exposed by the pandemic.

The global average cost of a data breach has reached an all-time high of $4.35 million – at least, among the 550 organizations surveyed by the Ponemon Institute for IBM Security (over a year from March 2021). Indeed, IBM goes so far as to claim that breaches may be contributing to the rising costs of goods and services. The survey states:

Sixty percent of studied organizations raised their product or services prices due to the breach, when the cost of goods is already soaring worldwide amid inflation and supply chain issues.

Incidents are also “haunting” organizations, says the company, with 83% having experienced more than one data breach, and with 50% of costs occurring more than a year after the successful attack.

Cloud maturity is a key factor, adds the report:

Forty-three percent of studied organizations are in the early stages [of cloud adoption] or have not started applying security practices across their cloud environments, observing over $660,000 in higher breach costs, on average, than studied organizations with mature security across their cloud environments.

Forty-five percent of respondents run a hybrid cloud infrastructure. This leads to lower average breach costs than among those operating a public- or private-cloud model: $3.8 million versus $5.02 million (public) and $4.24 million (private).

That said, those are still significant costs, and may suggest that complexity is what deters attackers, rather than having a single target to hit. Nonetheless, hybrid cloud adopters are able to identify and contain data breaches 15 days faster on average, says the report.

However, with 277 days being the average time lag – an extraordinary figure – the real lesson may be that today’s enterprise systems are adept at hiding security breaches, which may appear as normal network traffic. Forty-five percent of breaches occurred in the cloud, says the report, so it is clearly imperative to get on top of security in that domain.

IBM then makes the following bold claim :

Participating organizations fully deploying security AI and automation incurred $3.05 million less on average in breach costs compared to studied organizations that have not deployed the technology – the biggest cost saver observed in the study.

Whether this finding will stand for long as attackers explore new ways to breach automated and/or AI-based systems – and perhaps automate attacks of their own invisibly – remains to be seen. Compromised digital employee, anyone?

Global systems at risk

But perhaps the most telling finding is that cybersecurity has a political dimension – beyond the obvious one of Russian, Chinese, North Korean, or Iranian state incursions, of course.

Concerns over critical infrastructure and global supply chains are rising, with threat actors seeking to disrupt global systems that include financial services, industrial, transportation, and healthcare companies, among others.

A year ago in the US, the Biden administration issued an Executive Order on cybersecurity that focused on the urgent need for zero-trust systems. Despite this, only 21% of critical infrastructure organizations have so far adopted a zero-trust security model, according to the report. It states:

Almost 80% of the critical infrastructure organizations studied don’t adopt zero-trust strategies, seeing average breach costs rise to $5.4 million – a $1.17 million increase compared to those that do. All while 28% of breaches among these organizations were ransomware or destructive attacks.

Add to that, 17% of breaches at critical infrastructure organizations were caused due to a business partner being initially compromised, highlighting the security risks that over-trusting environments pose.

That aside, one of the big stories over the past couple of years has been the rise of ransomware: malicious code that locks up data, enterprise systems, or individual computers, forcing users to pay a ransom to (they hope) retrieve their systems or data.

But according to IBM, there are no obvious winners or losers in this insidious practice. The report adds:

Businesses that paid threat actors’ ransom demands saw $610,000 less in average breach costs compared to those that chose not to pay – not including the ransom amount paid.

However, when accounting for the average ransom payment – which according to Sophos reached $812,000 in 2021 – businesses that opt to pay the ransom could net higher total costs, all while inadvertently funding future ransomware attacks.”

The persistence of ransomware is fuelled by what IBM calls the “industrialization of cybercrime”.

The risk profile is also changing. Ransomware attack times show a massive drop of 94% over the past three years, from over two months to just under four days. Good news? Not at all, says the report, as the attacks may be higher impact, with more immediate consequences (such as destroyed data, or private data being made public on hacker forums).

My take

The key lesson in cybersecurity today is that all of us are both upstream and downstream from partners, suppliers, and customers in today’s extended enterprises. We are also at the mercy of reused but compromised code from trusted repositories, and even sometimes from hardware that has been compromised at source.

So, what is the answer? Businesses should ensure that their incident responses are tested rigorously and frequently in advance – along with using red-, blue-, or purple-team approaches (thinking like a hacker, a defender, or both).

Regrettably, IBM says that 37% of organizations that have IR plans in place fail to test them regularly. To paraphrase Spinal Tap, you can’t code for stupid.

Wed, 27 Jul 2022 12:00:00 -0500 BRAINSUM en text/html https://diginomica.com/cybersecurity-whats-real-cost-ask-ibm
P2065-016 exam dump and training guide direct download
Training Exams List