Trust these M8010-241 real questions and go for actual test.

when you are searching on web for M8010-241 eBooks so there are huge number of M8010-241 eBooks on internet free of cost, but those are all outdated and you will risk your precious time and money. Go directly to killexams.com, download 100% free M8010-241 questions PDF sample. Evaluate and register for full version. Practice M8010-241 dumps and pass the exam.

Exam Code: M8010-241 Practice test 2022 by Killexams.com team
IBM Enterprise Marketing Management Sales Mastery Test v1
IBM Enterprise pdf
Killexams : IBM Enterprise pdf - BingNews https://killexams.com/pass4sure/exam-detail/M8010-241 Search results Killexams : IBM Enterprise pdf - BingNews https://killexams.com/pass4sure/exam-detail/M8010-241 https://killexams.com/exam_list/IBM Killexams : IBM board probes claims of fudged sales figures that led to big bonuses for execs

Exclusive IBM's board of directors has started an investigation into claims that its sales numbers were manipulated, leading to executives securing big bonuses. If the board fails to take any action, it may face a lawsuit to claw back millions of dollars from top staff.

In late March, just days before IBM was sued for securities fraud, the IT giant's board received a demand letter from attorneys representing shareholders.

The letter, according to sources familiar with the matter, asked the board to investigate allegations that later surfaced in the securities lawsuit: that the company, under former CEO Ginny Rometty and current CEO Arvind Krishna, deceived shareholders by unlawfully manipulating mainframe revenues in a way that misled investors and inflated executive bonuses.

Our sources tell us that if the IBM board fails to deal with the allegations, a derivatives lawsuit is expected to follow in which the plaintiffs will try to claw back millions of dollars worth of bonus payments made to executives.

A shareholder derivatives lawsuit is brought by shareholders on behalf of a corporation. It is filed against corporate leaders – company board members, officers, or others – alleged to have neglected their fiduciary duty.

We're told IBM's board has engaged a law firm to investigate the fraud allegations. If the board takes no action to address the supposed fraud, the plaintiffs should then be able file a derivatives claim in the company's name.

Assuming the court finds sufficient merit in the plaintiffs' claim to allow a derivatives case, and if the plaintiffs prevail, most of any damage award would belong to the company – which would benefit shareholders, but would not go to them directly.

A legal scholar who spoke with The Register on background for lack of familiarity with this specific case said it's unusual for shareholders to present the board with a demand letter because unless you can show the board is conflicted or acting in self-interest, shareholders generally aren't allowed to initiate a derivatives case.

IBM did not respond to two requests to confirm or deny the existence of the demand letter.

Buried on page 38 of a 10-Q filing with the SEC last week, however, Big Blue disclosed it had received and responded to such a missive.

"On March 25, 2022, the Board of Directors received a shareholder demand letter making similar allegations [to the securities class-action lawsuit] and demanding that the company's Board of Directors take action to assert the company's rights," IBM noted in the submission, a detail that so far has gone unreported.

"A special committee of independent directors has been formed to investigate the issues raised in the letter."

The securities fraud claim [PDF] against IBM was filed on April 5 in New York, on behalf of the June E. Adams Irrevocable Trust. It names as defendants not only IBM, but current and former corporate leaders including Rometty, former CFO Martin J. Schroeter (now CEO of IBM spin-off Kyndryl), current CFO James J. Kavanaugh, and current CEO Arvind Krishna.

Since the lawsuit was initially filed by law firm Milberg Coleman Bryson Phillips Grossman, LLC, it has been joined by at least five other law firms representing other IBM shareholders. In June, the court recognized Iron Workers Local 580 Joint Funds as the lead plaintiff.

The complaint contends that IBM between April 4, 2017 and October 20, 2021 "improperly and in violation of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles ('GAAP') embarked on a fraudulent scheme to shift billions of dollars in revenues from its mainframe line of business to its Strategic Imperatives and CAMSS line of business."

... a fraudulent scheme to shift billions of dollars in revenues from its mainframe line of business to its Strategic Imperatives and CAMSS line of business

CAMSS is an abbreviation for Cloud, Analytics, Mobile, Security and Systems, business segments that were designated as strategic imperatives by IBM's leadership. The complaint argues that IBM instituted a bonus scheme that rewarded execs and encouraged IBM salespeople for the sale of CAMSS products. As a result, revenue arising from mainframe sales got reclassified as CAMSS sales, which boosted bonuses even as it misled investors – by giving shareholders an untrue picture of the IT giant's sales performance – it is claimed.

The Register spoke with two former IBM sales employees who were unaffiliated with the litigation and had between them more than forty years of experience with Big Blue. They described manipulative sales reporting – not all of which is necessarily unlawful – as a common practice, not only at IBM but at other large enterprise software firms.

"Think of it as, like, the worst kept secret," said one, who described one way IBM salespeople adjust sales figures to their own advantage. "It all starts with the CRM system, the customer relationship management system. IBM uses SugarCRM, but they make it very easy when you get a deal.

"You go through a bunch of checkboxes and you check off which categories pertain to this deal and how much of it is services, how much of it is hardware, how much in particular is cloud-based or analytics. And this is the big thing with the CAMSS, right? To check off all the boxes pertaining to CAMSS and then you allocate a percent to that."

That is to say, you only have to assign a small part of the sales deal to CAMSS to record it as a CAMSS win.

The other described various dubious directives that salespeople had to comply with, which steered salespeople toward meeting management goals and discouraged rocking the boat.

For example, this individual described IBM Z Linux part number manipulation. "A very common practice was to create a duplicate part number," this former IBMer explained. "It's a unique part number but there's no difference in product or delivery."

That makes no difference to the customer, we were told, but the way products got categorized affected sales staff and executive compensation.

The issue before the court in New York is whether flexible accounting of this sort, to the extent it can be documented, violated the law or IBM misled investors. If IBM's board finds no corrective actions are necessary, a successful derivatives complaint could return millions paid in unwarranted executive bonuses to company coffers. ®

Editor's note: This article was updated to clarify that the demand letter was sent in late March, just before the securities lawsuit was filed in April, as confirmed by the 10-Q filing.

Tue, 02 Aug 2022 07:27:00 -0500 en text/html https://www.theregister.com/2022/08/01/exclusive_ibm_board_of_directors/
Killexams : Global SaaS Enterprise Applications Market Is Set to Experience Revolutionary Growth by 2027

The MarketWatch News Department was not involved in the creation of this content.

Aug 01, 2022 (Heraldkeepers) -- Pune, India-The Global SaaS Enterprise Applications Market 2022 that centers around Global SaaS Enterprise Applications Market examines the significant components with a top to bottom methodology and empowers the client to survey the drawn-out based interest additionally predicts explicit executions. This report gives subjective investigation, clarifying item scope and expounding industry experiences and standpoint to 2027. The Global SaaS Enterprise Applications Market is a critical reference for essential and notable parts in the current market. The data separated in the report offers a thorough evaluation of the significant elements of Global SaaS Enterprise Applications Market like the chances, market patterns, cut-off points, and business methodologies. Likewise, the report additionally shows the current essential industry occasions along with their pertinent impact available. The market study report additionally includes the top vital participants in the Global SaaS Enterprise Applications Market.

To Get trial Copy of Report, Click Here: https://www.reportsweb.com/inquiry&RW00014721340/sample

Key Players: Microsoft, Sage Software, Ramco Systems, Oracle, SAP, Epicor Software, Google, IBM, Acumatica, Plex Systems, Box, Infor, Salesforce

(Our trial COPY of the report offers a quick advent to the Study report outlook, TOC, a listing of tables and figures, Analysis on Competitors of the market, and comprising key regions, also include COVID-19 impact Analysis)

Our Research Analyses Some Key Points for your Research Study:- Market Research Report, Industry Business Outlook, Revenue, Trends, Industry Business Outlook, Revenue, Comprehensive Analysis, Development Strategy, Future Plans and Industry Growth, Potential growth, attractive valuation, increasing demand with Industry Professionals, innovations, CAPEX cycle and the dynamic structure, increasing demand, gross profits, operating income, COGS, EBITDA, sales volume, product offerings, company landscape analysis, key strategic moves, key accurate developments, and technological roadmap

Advantage of requesting FREE trial PDF Report Before purchase to know about:

To part the breakdown information by districts, type, makers, and applications.

To break down and research the worldwide Global SaaS Enterprise Applications Market status and future figure, including, creation, income, utilization, recorded, and conjecture.

To distinguish huge patterns, drivers, impact factors in worldwide and locales.

To introduce the key Global SaaS Enterprise Applications Market makers, creation, income, piece of the pie, and ongoing turn of events.

To investigate serious advancements, for example, extensions, arrangements, new item dispatches, and acquisitions on the lookout.

To investigate the worldwide and key districts market potential and preferred position, opportunity, and challenge, limitations, and dangers.

Key Industry Insights:

This Market report is a wide audit that incorporates an itemized review of the Global SaaS Enterprise Applications Market business. The report clarifies kind of Global SaaS Enterprise Applications Market and application in various verticals of the market with respect to different nations and key areas. The examination has recorded and assessed all the central members in the worldwide Global SaaS Enterprise Applications Market and analyzed them based on various measurements, for example, yearly deals shipments volume, verifiable development rates, market income, and promoting techniques. Based on every one of these discoveries, the worldwide Global SaaS Enterprise Applications Market industry study report proposes key intends to Improve market positions for existing business sector members.

This Study Report Offers Following Objectives:

  1. Conjecture and examination of the worldwide Global SaaS Enterprise Applications Market deals, share, worth, status and figure (2020-2027).
  2. Break down the local just as nation level portions, share development for Global SaaS Enterprise Applications Market.
  3. Investigation of Global SaaS Enterprise Applications Market industry-driving makers/players.
  4. Characterize and investigate the market rivalry scene, SWOT examination.
  5. Estimates and investigation of the portions, sub-sections and the provincial business sectors dependent on last of 5 years market history.
  6. Examination of the Global SaaS Enterprise Applications Market by Type, by Application/end clients and district insightful.
  7. Estimate and investigation of the Global SaaS Enterprise Applications Market Trends, Drivers, Investment Opportunities, Openings, Risk, Difficulties, and suggestions.
  8. Investigate the critical driving elements, patterns which confine market development.
  9. Portray the partner’s chances in the market by recognizing the high development fragments.

There are 15 Key Chapters Covered in the Global SaaS Enterprise Applications Market:

Chapter 1, Industry Overview of Global SaaS Enterprise Applications Market;

Chapter 2, Classification, Specifications and Definition of Global SaaS Enterprise Applications Market Segment by Regions;

Chapter 3, Industry Suppliers, Manufacturing Process and Cost Structure, Chain Structure, Raw Material;

Chapter 4, Research Findings/Conclusion, Global SaaS Enterprise Applications Market deals channel, traders, distributors, dealers analysis;

Chapter 5, Complete Market Research, Capacity, Sales and Sales Price Analysis with Company Segment;

Chapter 6, Analysis of Regional Market that contains the United States, Europe, India, China, Japan, Korea & Taiwan;

Chapter 7 & 8, Global SaaS Enterprise Applications Market Analysis by Major Manufacturers, The Global SaaS Enterprise Applications Market Segment Market Analysis (by Type) and (by Application);

Chapter 9, Regional Market Trend Analysis, Market Trend by Product Type and by Application:

Chapter 10 & 11, Supply Chain Analysis, Regional Marketing Type Analysis, Global Trade Type Analysis;

Chapter 12, The Global SaaS Enterprise Applications Market industry consumers Analysis;

Chapter 13, Appendix and data source of Global SaaS Enterprise Applications Market.

Click here to avail lucrative discounts on our latest reports. We offer student, enterprise, and special periodic discounts to our clientele. Please fill the inquiry form below to know more – https://www.reportsweb.com/inquiry&RW00014721340/discount

About Us

ReportsWeb is a one stop shop of market research reports and solutions to various companies across the globe. We help our clients in their decision support system by helping them choose most relevant and cost-effective research reports and solutions from various publishers.

The market research industry has changed in last decade. As corporate focus has shifted to niche markets and emerging countries, a number of publishers have stepped in to fulfil these information needs. We have experienced and trained staff that helps you navigate different options and lets you choose best research solution at most effective cost.

Contact Us

Sameer Joshi

Phone:+1-646-491-9876 || +91-20-67271633 Rest of the World

Email: sales@reportsweb.com

Web: www.reportsweb.com

COMTEX_411337428/2582/2022-08-01T04:14:39

Is there a problem with this press release? Contact the source provider Comtex at editorial@comtex.com. You can also contact MarketWatch Customer Service via our Customer Center.

The MarketWatch News Department was not involved in the creation of this content.

Sun, 31 Jul 2022 20:14:00 -0500 en-US text/html https://www.marketwatch.com/press-release/global-saas-enterprise-applications-market-is-set-to-experience-revolutionary-growth-by-2027-2022-08-01
Killexams : Sicherheit: Mehrere Probleme in java-1_8_0-ibm
SUSE Security Update: Security update for java-1_8_0-ibm
______________________________________________________________________________

Announcement ID: SUSE-SU-2022:2650-1
Rating: important
References: #1191912 #1194931 #1198670 #1198671 #1198672
#1198673 #1198674 #1198675 #1201643
Cross-References: CVE-2021-35561 CVE-2022-21299 CVE-2022-21426
CVE-2022-21434 CVE-2022-21443 CVE-2022-21449
CVE-2022-21476 CVE-2022-21496
CVSS scores:
CVE-2021-35561 (NVD) : 5.3
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
CVE-2021-35561 (SUSE): 5.3
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
CVE-2022-21299 (NVD) : 5.3
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
CVE-2022-21299 (SUSE): 5.3
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
CVE-2022-21426 (NVD) : 5.3
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
CVE-2022-21426 (SUSE): 5.3
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
CVE-2022-21434 (NVD) : 5.3
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CVE-2022-21434 (SUSE): 5.3
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CVE-2022-21443 (NVD) : 3.7
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
CVE-2022-21443 (SUSE): 3.7
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
CVE-2022-21449 (NVD) : 7.5
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
CVE-2022-21449 (SUSE): 7.5
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
CVE-2022-21476 (NVD) : 7.5
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
CVE-2022-21476 (SUSE): 7.5
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
CVE-2022-21496 (NVD) : 5.3
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CVE-2022-21496 (SUSE): 5.3
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Affected Products:
SUSE CaaS Platform 4.0
SUSE Enterprise Storage 6
SUSE Enterprise Storage 7
SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing
SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Legacy Software 15-SP3
SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Legacy Software 15-SP4
SUSE Linux Enterprise Server
SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15-LTSS
SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15-SP1-BCL
SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15-SP1-LTSS
SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15-SP2-LTSS
SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP 15
SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP 15-SP1
SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP 15-SP2
SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications
SUSE Linux Enterprise Storage 7.1
SUSE Manager Proxy 4.1
SUSE Manager Proxy 4.2
SUSE Manager Proxy 4.3
SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server 4.1
SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server 4.2
SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server 4.3
SUSE Manager Server 4.1
SUSE Manager Server 4.2
SUSE Manager Server 4.3
openSUSE Leap 15.3
openSUSE Leap 15.4
______________________________________________________________________________

An update that solves 8 vulnerabilities and has one errata
is now available.

Description:

This update for java-1_8_0-ibm fixes the following issues:

Update to Java 8.0 Service Refresh 7 Fix Pack 10 [bsc#1201643]

- CVE-2022-21476 (bsc#1198671), CVE-2022-21449 (bsc#1198670),
CVE-2022-21496 (bsc#1198673), CVE-2022-21434 (bsc#1198674),
CVE-2022-21426 (bsc#1198672), CVE-2022-21443 (bsc#1198675),
CVE-2021-35561 (bsc#1191912), CVE-2022-21299 (bsc#1194931).

Patch Instructions:

To install this SUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation
methods
like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".

Alternatively you can run the command listed for your product:

- openSUSE Leap 15.4:

zypper in -t patch openSUSE-SLE-15.4-2022-2650=1

- openSUSE Leap 15.3:

zypper in -t patch openSUSE-SLE-15.3-2022-2650=1

- SUSE Manager Server 4.1:

zypper in -t patch SUSE-SLE-Product-SUSE-Manager-Server-4.1-2022-2650=1

- SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server 4.1:

zypper in -t patch
SUSE-SLE-Product-SUSE-Manager-Retail-Branch-Server-4.1-2022-2650=1

- SUSE Manager Proxy 4.1:

zypper in -t patch SUSE-SLE-Product-SUSE-Manager-Proxy-4.1-2022-2650=1

- SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP 15-SP2:

zypper in -t patch SUSE-SLE-Product-SLES_SAP-15-SP2-2022-2650=1

- SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP 15-SP1:

zypper in -t patch SUSE-SLE-Product-SLES_SAP-15-SP1-2022-2650=1

- SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP 15:

zypper in -t patch SUSE-SLE-Product-SLES_SAP-15-2022-2650=1

- SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15-SP2-LTSS:

zypper in -t patch SUSE-SLE-Product-SLES-15-SP2-LTSS-2022-2650=1

- SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15-SP1-LTSS:

zypper in -t patch SUSE-SLE-Product-SLES-15-SP1-LTSS-2022-2650=1

- SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15-SP1-BCL:

zypper in -t patch SUSE-SLE-Product-SLES-15-SP1-BCL-2022-2650=1

- SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15-LTSS:

zypper in -t patch SUSE-SLE-Product-SLES-15-2022-2650=1

- SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Legacy Software 15-SP4:

zypper in -t patch SUSE-SLE-Module-Legacy-15-SP4-2022-2650=1

- SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Legacy Software 15-SP3:

zypper in -t patch SUSE-SLE-Module-Legacy-15-SP3-2022-2650=1

- SUSE Enterprise Storage 7:

zypper in -t patch SUSE-Storage-7-2022-2650=1

- SUSE Enterprise Storage 6:

zypper in -t patch SUSE-Storage-6-2022-2650=1

- SUSE CaaS Platform 4.0:

To install this update, use the SUSE CaaS Platform 'skuba' tool.
It
will inform you if it detects new updates and let you then trigger
updating of the complete cluster in a controlled way.

Package List:

- openSUSE Leap 15.4 (ppc64le s390x x86_64):

java-1_8_0-ibm-1.8.0_sr7.10-150000.3.59.1
java-1_8_0-ibm-demo-1.8.0_sr7.10-150000.3.59.1
java-1_8_0-ibm-devel-1.8.0_sr7.10-150000.3.59.1
java-1_8_0-ibm-src-1.8.0_sr7.10-150000.3.59.1

- openSUSE Leap 15.4 (x86_64):

java-1_8_0-ibm-32bit-1.8.0_sr7.10-150000.3.59.1
java-1_8_0-ibm-alsa-1.8.0_sr7.10-150000.3.59.1
java-1_8_0-ibm-devel-32bit-1.8.0_sr7.10-150000.3.59.1
java-1_8_0-ibm-plugin-1.8.0_sr7.10-150000.3.59.1

- openSUSE Leap 15.3 (ppc64le s390x x86_64):

java-1_8_0-ibm-1.8.0_sr7.10-150000.3.59.1
java-1_8_0-ibm-demo-1.8.0_sr7.10-150000.3.59.1
java-1_8_0-ibm-devel-1.8.0_sr7.10-150000.3.59.1
java-1_8_0-ibm-src-1.8.0_sr7.10-150000.3.59.1

- openSUSE Leap 15.3 (x86_64):

java-1_8_0-ibm-32bit-1.8.0_sr7.10-150000.3.59.1
java-1_8_0-ibm-alsa-1.8.0_sr7.10-150000.3.59.1
java-1_8_0-ibm-devel-32bit-1.8.0_sr7.10-150000.3.59.1
java-1_8_0-ibm-plugin-1.8.0_sr7.10-150000.3.59.1

- SUSE Manager Server 4.1 (ppc64le s390x x86_64):

java-1_8_0-ibm-1.8.0_sr7.10-150000.3.59.1
java-1_8_0-ibm-devel-1.8.0_sr7.10-150000.3.59.1

- SUSE Manager Server 4.1 (x86_64):

java-1_8_0-ibm-alsa-1.8.0_sr7.10-150000.3.59.1
java-1_8_0-ibm-plugin-1.8.0_sr7.10-150000.3.59.1

- SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server 4.1 (x86_64):

java-1_8_0-ibm-1.8.0_sr7.10-150000.3.59.1
java-1_8_0-ibm-alsa-1.8.0_sr7.10-150000.3.59.1
java-1_8_0-ibm-devel-1.8.0_sr7.10-150000.3.59.1
java-1_8_0-ibm-plugin-1.8.0_sr7.10-150000.3.59.1

- SUSE Manager Proxy 4.1 (x86_64):

java-1_8_0-ibm-1.8.0_sr7.10-150000.3.59.1
java-1_8_0-ibm-alsa-1.8.0_sr7.10-150000.3.59.1
java-1_8_0-ibm-devel-1.8.0_sr7.10-150000.3.59.1
java-1_8_0-ibm-plugin-1.8.0_sr7.10-150000.3.59.1

- SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP 15-SP2 (ppc64le x86_64):

java-1_8_0-ibm-1.8.0_sr7.10-150000.3.59.1
java-1_8_0-ibm-devel-1.8.0_sr7.10-150000.3.59.1

- SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP 15-SP2 (x86_64):

java-1_8_0-ibm-alsa-1.8.0_sr7.10-150000.3.59.1
java-1_8_0-ibm-plugin-1.8.0_sr7.10-150000.3.59.1

- SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP 15-SP1 (ppc64le x86_64):

java-1_8_0-ibm-1.8.0_sr7.10-150000.3.59.1
java-1_8_0-ibm-devel-1.8.0_sr7.10-150000.3.59.1

- SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP 15-SP1 (x86_64):

java-1_8_0-ibm-alsa-1.8.0_sr7.10-150000.3.59.1
java-1_8_0-ibm-plugin-1.8.0_sr7.10-150000.3.59.1

- SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP 15 (ppc64le x86_64):

java-1_8_0-ibm-1.8.0_sr7.10-150000.3.59.1
java-1_8_0-ibm-devel-1.8.0_sr7.10-150000.3.59.1

- SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP 15 (x86_64):

java-1_8_0-ibm-alsa-1.8.0_sr7.10-150000.3.59.1
java-1_8_0-ibm-plugin-1.8.0_sr7.10-150000.3.59.1

- SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15-SP2-LTSS (ppc64le s390x x86_64):

java-1_8_0-ibm-1.8.0_sr7.10-150000.3.59.1
java-1_8_0-ibm-devel-1.8.0_sr7.10-150000.3.59.1

- SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15-SP2-LTSS (x86_64):

java-1_8_0-ibm-alsa-1.8.0_sr7.10-150000.3.59.1
java-1_8_0-ibm-plugin-1.8.0_sr7.10-150000.3.59.1

- SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15-SP1-LTSS (ppc64le s390x x86_64):

java-1_8_0-ibm-1.8.0_sr7.10-150000.3.59.1
java-1_8_0-ibm-devel-1.8.0_sr7.10-150000.3.59.1

- SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15-SP1-LTSS (x86_64):

java-1_8_0-ibm-alsa-1.8.0_sr7.10-150000.3.59.1
java-1_8_0-ibm-plugin-1.8.0_sr7.10-150000.3.59.1

- SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15-SP1-BCL (x86_64):

java-1_8_0-ibm-1.8.0_sr7.10-150000.3.59.1
java-1_8_0-ibm-alsa-1.8.0_sr7.10-150000.3.59.1
java-1_8_0-ibm-devel-1.8.0_sr7.10-150000.3.59.1
java-1_8_0-ibm-plugin-1.8.0_sr7.10-150000.3.59.1

- SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15-LTSS (s390x):

java-1_8_0-ibm-1.8.0_sr7.10-150000.3.59.1
java-1_8_0-ibm-devel-1.8.0_sr7.10-150000.3.59.1

- SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Legacy Software 15-SP4 (ppc64le s390x
x86_64):

java-1_8_0-ibm-1.8.0_sr7.10-150000.3.59.1
java-1_8_0-ibm-devel-1.8.0_sr7.10-150000.3.59.1

- SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Legacy Software 15-SP4 (x86_64):

java-1_8_0-ibm-alsa-1.8.0_sr7.10-150000.3.59.1
java-1_8_0-ibm-plugin-1.8.0_sr7.10-150000.3.59.1

- SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Legacy Software 15-SP3 (ppc64le s390x
x86_64):

java-1_8_0-ibm-1.8.0_sr7.10-150000.3.59.1
java-1_8_0-ibm-devel-1.8.0_sr7.10-150000.3.59.1

- SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Legacy Software 15-SP3 (x86_64):

java-1_8_0-ibm-alsa-1.8.0_sr7.10-150000.3.59.1
java-1_8_0-ibm-plugin-1.8.0_sr7.10-150000.3.59.1

- SUSE Enterprise Storage 7 (x86_64):

java-1_8_0-ibm-1.8.0_sr7.10-150000.3.59.1
java-1_8_0-ibm-alsa-1.8.0_sr7.10-150000.3.59.1
java-1_8_0-ibm-devel-1.8.0_sr7.10-150000.3.59.1
java-1_8_0-ibm-plugin-1.8.0_sr7.10-150000.3.59.1

- SUSE Enterprise Storage 6 (x86_64):

java-1_8_0-ibm-1.8.0_sr7.10-150000.3.59.1
java-1_8_0-ibm-alsa-1.8.0_sr7.10-150000.3.59.1
java-1_8_0-ibm-devel-1.8.0_sr7.10-150000.3.59.1
java-1_8_0-ibm-plugin-1.8.0_sr7.10-150000.3.59.1

- SUSE CaaS Platform 4.0 (x86_64):

java-1_8_0-ibm-1.8.0_sr7.10-150000.3.59.1
java-1_8_0-ibm-alsa-1.8.0_sr7.10-150000.3.59.1
java-1_8_0-ibm-devel-1.8.0_sr7.10-150000.3.59.1
java-1_8_0-ibm-plugin-1.8.0_sr7.10-150000.3.59.1

References:

https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2021-35561.html
https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-21299.html
https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-21426.html
https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-21434.html
https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-21443.html
https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-21449.html
https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-21476.html
https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-21496.html
https://bugzilla.suse.com/1191912
https://bugzilla.suse.com/1194931
https://bugzilla.suse.com/1198670
https://bugzilla.suse.com/1198671
https://bugzilla.suse.com/1198672
https://bugzilla.suse.com/1198673
https://bugzilla.suse.com/1198674
https://bugzilla.suse.com/1198675
https://bugzilla.suse.com/1201643

Wed, 03 Aug 2022 16:17:00 -0500 de text/html https://www.pro-linux.de/sicherheit/2/68609/sicherheit-mehrere-probleme-in-java-1_8_0-ibm.html
Killexams : CIOReview Names Cobalt Iron Among 10 Most Promising IBM Solution Providers 2022

LAWRENCE, Kan.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Jul 28, 2022--

Cobalt Iron Inc., a leading provider of SaaS-based enterprise data protection, today announced that the company has been deemed one of the 10 Most Promising IBM Solution Providers 2022 by CIOReview Magazine. The annual list of companies is selected by a panel of experts and members of CIOReview Magazine’s editorial board to recognize and promote innovation and entrepreneurship. A technology partner for IBM, Cobalt Iron earned the distinction based on its Compass ® enterprise SaaS backup platform for monitoring, managing, provisioning, and securing the entire enterprise backup landscape.

This press release features multimedia. View the full release here: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20220728005043/en/

Cobalt Iron Compass® is a SaaS-based data protection platform leveraging strong IBM technologies for delivering a secure, modernized approach to data protection. (Graphic: Business Wire)

According to CIOReview, “Cobalt Iron has built a patented cyber-resilience technology in a SaaS model to alleviate the complexities of managing large, multivendor setups, providing an effectual humanless backup experience. This SaaS-based data protection platform, called Compass, leverages strong IBM technologies. For example, IBM Spectrum Protect is embedded into the platform from a data backup and recovery perspective. ... By combining IBM’s technologies and the intellectual property built by Cobalt Iron, the company delivers a secure, modernized approach to data protection, providing a ‘true’ software as a service.”

Through proprietary technology, the Compass data protection platform integrates with, automates, and optimizes best-of-breed technologies, including IBM Spectrum Protect, IBM FlashSystem, IBM Red Hat Linux, IBM Cloud, and IBM Cloud Object Storage. Compass enhances and extends IBM technologies by automating more than 80% of backup infrastructure operations, optimizing the backup landscape through analytics, and securing backup data, making it a valuable addition to IBM’s data protection offerings.

CIOReview also praised Compass for its simple and intuitive interface to display a consolidated view of data backups across an entire organization without logging in to every backup product instance to extract data. The machine learning-enabled platform also automates backup processes and infrastructure, and it uses open APIs to connect with ticket management systems to generate tickets automatically about any backups that need immediate attention.

To ensure the security of data backups, Cobalt Iron has developed an architecture and security feature set called Cyber Shield for 24/7 threat protection, detection, and analysis that improves ransomware responsiveness. Compass is also being enhanced to use several patented techniques that are specific to analytics and ransomware. For example, analytics-based cloud brokering of data protection operations helps enterprises make secure, efficient, and cost-effective use of their cloud infrastructures. Another patented technique — dynamic IT infrastructure optimization in response to cyberthreats — offers unique ransomware analytics and automated optimization that will enable Compass to reconfigure IT infrastructure automatically when it detects cyberthreats, such as a ransomware attack, and dynamically adjust access to backup infrastructure and data to reduce exposure.

Compass is part of IBM’s product portfolio through the IBM Passport Advantage program. Through Passport Advantage, IBM sellers, partners, and distributors around the world can sell Compass under IBM part numbers to any organizations, particularly complex enterprises, that greatly benefit from the automated data protection and anti-ransomware solutions Compass delivers.

CIOReview’s report concludes, “With such innovations, all eyes will be on Cobalt Iron for further advancements in humanless, secure data backup solutions. Cobalt Iron currently focuses on IP protection and continuous R&D to bring about additional cybersecurity-related innovations, promising a more secure future for an enterprise’s data.”

About Cobalt Iron

Cobalt Iron was founded in 2013 to bring about fundamental changes in the world’s approach to secure data protection, and today the company’s Compass ® is the world’s leading SaaS-based enterprise data protection system. Through analytics and automation, Compass enables enterprises to transform and optimize legacy backup solutions into a simple cloud-based architecture with built-in cybersecurity. Processing more than 8 million jobs a month for customers in 44 countries, Compass delivers modern data protection for enterprise customers around the world. www.cobaltiron.com

Product or service names mentioned herein are the trademarks of their respective owners.

Link to Word Doc:www.wallstcom.com/CobaltIron/220728-Cobalt_Iron-CIOReview_Top_IBM_Provider_2022.docx

Photo Link:www.wallstcom.com/CobaltIron/Cobalt_Iron_CIO_Review_Top_IBM_Solution_Provider_Award_Logo.pdf

Photo Caption: Cobalt Iron Compass ® is a SaaS-based data protection platform leveraging strong IBM technologies for delivering a secure, modernized approach to data protection.

Follow Cobalt Iron

https://twitter.com/cobaltiron

https://www.linkedin.com/company/cobalt-iron/

https://www.youtube.com/user/CobaltIronLLC

View source version on businesswire.com:https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20220728005043/en/

CONTACT: Agency Contact:

Sunny Branson

Wall Street Communications

Tel: +1 801 326 9946

Email:sunny@wallstcom.com

Web:www.wallstcom.comCobalt Iron Contact:

Mary Spurlock

VP of Marketing

Tel: +1 785 979 9461

Email:maspurlock@cobaltiron.com

Web:www.cobaltiron.com

KEYWORD: EUROPE UNITED STATES NORTH AMERICA KANSAS

INDUSTRY KEYWORD: DATA MANAGEMENT SECURITY TECHNOLOGY SOFTWARE NETWORKS INTERNET

SOURCE: Cobalt Iron

Copyright Business Wire 2022.

PUB: 07/28/2022 09:00 AM/DISC: 07/28/2022 09:03 AM

http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20220728005043/en

Thu, 28 Jul 2022 01:29:00 -0500 en text/html https://www.eagletribune.com/region/cioreview-names-cobalt-iron-among-10-most-promising-ibm-solution-providers-2022/article_56f7dda7-cbd5-586a-9d5f-f882022100da.html
Killexams : IBM Uses Power10 CPU As An I/O Switch

Back in early July, we covered the launch of IBM’s entry and midrange Power10 systems and mused about how Big Blue could use these systems to reinvigorate an HPC business rather than just satisfy the needs of the enterprise customers who run transaction processing systems and are looking to add AI inference to their applications through matrix math units on the Power10 chip.

We are still gathering up information on how the midrange Power E1050 stacks up on SAP HANA and other workloads, but in poking around the architecture of the entry single-socket Power S1014 and the dual-socket S1022 and S1024 machines, we found something interesting that we thought we should share with you. We didn’t see it at first, and you will understand immediately why.

Here is the block diagram we got our hands on from IBM’s presentations to its resellers for the Power S1014 machine:

You can clearly see an I/O chip that adds some extra PCI-Express traffic lanes to the Power10 processor complex, right?

Same here with the block diagram of the Power S1022 (2U chassis) machines, which use the same system boards:

There are a pair of I/O switches in there, as you can see, which is not a big deal. Intel has co-packaged PCH chipsets in the same package as the Xeon CPUs with the Xeon D line for years, starting with the “Broadwell-DE” Xeon D processor in May 2015. IBM has used PCI-Express switches in the past to stretch the I/O inside a single machine beyond what comes off natively from the CPUs, such as with the Power IC922 inference engine Big Blue launched in January 2020, which you can see here:

The two PEX blocks in the center are PCI-Express switches, either from Broadcom or MicroChip if we had to guess.

But, that is not what is happening with the Power10 entry machines. Rather, IBM has created a single dual-chip module with two whole Power10 chips inside of it, and in the case of the low-end machines where AIX and IBM i customers don’t need a lot of compute but they do need a lot of I/O, the second Power10 chip has all of its cores turned off and it is acting like an I/O switch for the first Power10 chip that does have cores turned on.

You can see this clearly in this more detailed block diagram of the Power S1014 machine:

And in a more detailed block diagram of the two-socket Power S1022 motherboard:

This is the first time we can recall seeing something like this, but obviously any processor architecture could support the same functions.

In the two-socket Power S1024 and Power L1024 machines

What we find particularly interesting is the idea that those Power10 “switch” chips – the ones with no cores activated – could in theory also have eight OpenCAPI Memory Interface (OMI) ports turned on, doubling the memory capacity of the systems using skinnier and slightly faster 128 GB memory sticks, which run at 3.2 GHz, rather than having to move to denser 256 GB memory sticks that run at a slower 2.67 GHz when they are available next year. And in fact, you could take this all one step further and turn off all of the Power10 cores and turn on all of the 16 OMI memory slots across each DCM and create a fat 8 TB or 16 TB memory server that through the Power10 memory area network – what IBM calls memory inception – could serve as the main memory for a bunch of Power10 nodes with no memory of their own.

We wonder if IBM will do such a thing, and also ponder what such a cluster of memory-less server nodes talking to a centralized memory node might do with SAP HANA, Spark, data analytics, and other memory intensive work like genomics. The Power10 chip has a 2 PB upper memory limit, and that is the only cap on where this might go.

There is another neat thing IBM could do here, too. Imagine if the Power10 compute chip in a DCM had no I/O at all but just lots of memory attached to it and the secondary Power10 chip had only a few cores and all of the I/O of the complex. That would, in effect, make the second Power10 chip a DPU for the first one.

The engineers at IBM are clearly thinking outside of the box; it will be interesting to see if the product managers and marketeers do so.

Tue, 26 Jul 2022 05:34:00 -0500 Timothy Prickett Morgan en-US text/html https://www.nextplatform.com/2022/07/26/ibm-uses-power10-cpu-as-an-i-o-switch/
Killexams : Enterprise Agile Planning Tools Market Research Report Analysis by Competition, Sales, Revenue, Market Size 2022 to 2028

The MarketWatch News Department was not involved in the creation of this content.

Jul 27, 2022 (Reportmines via Comtex) -- Pre and Post Covid is covered and Report Customization is available.

The "Enterprise Agile Planning ToolsMarket research report" profile investigates the company's business structure, operations, important products and services, prospects, locations and subsidiaries, key executives' biographies, and key rivals 2022 to 2028. The revenue trends, profitability, growth, margins and returns, liquidity and leverage, financial condition, and efficiency ratios are all included in this Enterprise Agile Planning Tools Market study. For this study on the Enterprise Agile Planning Tools market, the researchers used modern primary and secondary research approaches and technologies.Here is a list of the best key players Listed in the Enterprise Agile Planning Tools Market report is Atlassian,Microsoft,VersionOne (CollabNet),Targetprocess,Planview (LeanKit),FogCreek,IBM,Pivotal,Blueprint,AgileCraft,Inflectra,GitLab,Micro Focus,CollabNet,Digite,Broadcom,Perforce Software,Thought Works.

The global Enterprise Agile Planning Tools market size is projected to reach multi million by 2028, in comparision to 2021, at unexpected CAGR during 2022-2028 (Ask for trial Report).

Get trial PDF of Enterprise Agile Planning Tools Market Analysis https://www.reportmines.com/enquiry/request-sample/1197406

The assembly, revenue, price, market share, and rate of growth of each type are displayed in the Enterprise Agile Planning Tools market industry research report, which is divided into On-Premises,Managed,Hybrid. The status and outlook for main applications/end users, consumption (sales), market share, and rate of growth for each application, including 0-100 Users,100-500 Users,Above 500 Users, are all included in this Enterprise Agile Planning Tools market research report. North America: United States, Canada, Europe: GermanyFrance, U.K., Italy, Russia,Asia-Pacific: China, Japan, South, India, Australia, China, Indonesia, Thailand, Malaysia, Latin America:Mexico, Brazil, Argentina, Colombia, Middle East & Africa:Turkey, Saudi, Arabia, UAE, Korea is a list of regions covered in the Enterprise Agile Planning Tools Market Report. The report has a page count of 127.

Get trial PDF of Enterprise Agile Planning Tools Market Analysis https://www.reportmines.com/enquiry/request-sample/1197406

The top competitors in the Enterprise Agile Planning Tools Market, as highlighted in the report, are:

  • Atlassian
  • Microsoft
  • VersionOne (CollabNet)
  • Targetprocess
  • Planview (LeanKit)
  • FogCreek
  • IBM
  • Pivotal
  • Blueprint
  • AgileCraft
  • Inflectra
  • GitLab
  • Micro Focus
  • CollabNet
  • Digite
  • Broadcom
  • Perforce Software
  • Thought Works

Purchase this report https://www.reportmines.com/purchase/1197406 (Price 4900 USD for a Single-User License)

Market Segmentation

The worldwide Enterprise Agile Planning Tools Market is categorized on Component, Deployment, Application, and Region.

The Enterprise Agile Planning Tools Market Analysis by types is segmented into:

  • On-Premises
  • Managed
  • Hybrid

The Enterprise Agile Planning Tools Market Industry Research by Application is segmented into:

  • 0-100 Users
  • 100-500 Users
  • Above 500 Users

In terms of Region, the Enterprise Agile Planning Tools Market Players available by Region are:

  • North America:
  • Europe:
    • Germany
    • France
    • U.K.
    • Italy
    • Russia
  • Asia-Pacific:
    • China
    • Japan
    • South Korea
    • India
    • Australia
    • China Taiwan
    • Indonesia
    • Thailand
    • Malaysia
  • Latin America:
    • Mexico
    • Brazil
    • Argentina Korea
    • Colombia
  • Middle East & Africa:
    • Turkey
    • Saudi
    • Arabia
    • UAE
    • Korea

Inquire or Share Your Questions If Any Before the Purchasing This Report https://www.reportmines.com/enquiry/pre-order-enquiry/1197406

Key Benefits for Industry Participants & Stakeholders:

Players, stakeholders, and other stakeholders in the Enterprise Agile Planning Tools market industry research will be able to gain an advantage by utilizing the Enterprise Agile Planning Tools market research report as a resource. The global Enterprise Agile Planning Tools market research report's value chain analysis, sales breakdown, and competitive situation are combined with regional-level forecasts.

The Enterprise Agile Planning Tools market research report contains the following TOC:

  • Report Overview
  • Global Growth Trends
  • Competition Landscape by Key Players
  • Data by Type
  • Data by Application
  • North America Market Analysis
  • Europe Market Analysis
  • Asia-Pacific Market Analysis
  • Latin America Market Analysis
  • Middle East & Africa Market Analysis
  • Key Players Profiles Market Analysis
  • Analysts Viewpoints/Conclusions
  • Appendix

Get a trial of TOC https://www.reportmines.com/toc/1197406#tableofcontents

Highlights of The Enterprise Agile Planning Tools Market Report

The Enterprise Agile Planning Tools Market Industry Research Report contains:

  • International and domestic market segmentation
  • Major changes in the Enterprise Agile Planning Tools market research structure
  • Regional and country-level competitive analysis
  • The Enterprise Agile Planning Tools market share, size, and growth comprehension analysis
  • The most common growth strategies employed by business owners

Purchase this report https://www.reportmines.com/purchase/1197406 (Price 4900 USD for a Single-User License)

COVID 19 Impact Analysis:

The Enterprise Agile Planning Tools market industry trend segmentation is based on various characteristics such as kinds, applications, and regions. In addition, the Enterprise Agile Planning Tools market research report evaluates the impact of the new COVID-19 pandemic on the Enterprise Agile Planning Tools market research and provides a unique assessment of the predicted market changes during the forecasted time frame. Enterprise Agile Planning Tools Market Share, Stock Determinations and Figures, contact information, Sales, Capacity, Production, Price, Cost, Revenue, and Business Profiles are all encased within the Enterprise Agile Planning Tools market report. Over the forecast period, the Enterprise Agile Planning Tools market research report comprises market segmentation, competitive analysis, and regional study.

Get Covid-19 Impact Analysis for Enterprise Agile Planning Tools Market research report https://www.reportmines.com/enquiry/request-covid19/1197406

Enterprise Agile Planning Tools Market Size and Industry Challenges:

The Enterprise Agile Planning Tools market research report includes Company Profile, Product Specifications, Revenue, Price, and Gross Margin Sales, as well as a comprehensive analysis of the market competitive landscape and detailed information on vendors, as well as comprehensive details of factors that will challenge the growth of major market vendors.

Get trial PDF of Enterprise Agile Planning Tools Market Analysis https://www.reportmines.com/enquiry/request-sample/1197406

Reasons to Purchase the Enterprise Agile Planning Tools Market Report:

  • Identify rising players with potentially strong product portfolios in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools market research.
  • develop effective counter-strategies to acquire a competitive edge.
  • Tactical initiatives were formed by knowing the focus areas of prominent organizations, which helped to plan mergers and acquisitions more effectively.

Purchase this report https://www.reportmines.com/purchase/1197406 (Price 4900 USD for a Single-User License)

Contact Us:

Name: Aniket Tiwari

Email: sales@reportmines.com

Phone: USA:+1 917 267 7384 / IN:+91 777 709 3097

Website: https://www.reportmines.com/

Report Published by: ReportMines

More Reports Published By Us:

Global Enterprise High-Productivity Application Platform Market Insights and Forecast to 2028

Global Enterprise Information Archiving (EIA) Market Insights and Forecast to 2028

Global Enterprise Infrastructure VPN Market Insights and Forecast to 2028

Global File Analysis Software Market Insights and Forecast to 2028

Source: QYR

Press Release Distributed by Lemon PR Wire

To view the original version on Lemon PR Wire visit Enterprise Agile Planning Tools Market Research Report Analysis by Competition, Sales, Revenue, Market Size 2022 to 2028

COMTEX_411076020/2788/2022-07-27T10:00:10

The MarketWatch News Department was not involved in the creation of this content.

Wed, 27 Jul 2022 02:00:00 -0500 en-US text/html https://www.marketwatch.com/press-release/enterprise-agile-planning-tools-market-research-report-analysis-by-competition-sales-revenue-market-size-2022-to-2028-2022-07-27
Killexams : Enterprise Streaming and Webcasting Market Size 2022, Trends, Growth Insight, Share, Competitive, Regional, And Global Industry Forecast to 2029

Enterprise Streaming and Webcasting Market 2022 Global Industry research report presents you analysis of market size, share, and growth, trends, and cost structure, statistical and comprehensive data of the global market. Top Key Players are – STREAMSHARK, Kollective, Wistia, IBM, Arkena, VIMEO, Qumu, Agile Content, Viocorp, Vbrick, DACAST, Haivision, Ooyala, Vidizmo.

Global “Enterprise Streaming and Webcasting Market“report provides a meticulous analysis of market dynamics, size, share, current developments, and trending business strategies. This report gives a complete analysis of different segments on the basis of type, application, and region. The study was made to combine both, primary and secondary information along with inputs from the major candidates in the global Enterprise Streaming and Webcasting industry. Experts use the most accurate Enterprise Streaming and Webcasting Market research techniques and tools to assemble widespread and precise marketing research reports.

Get a trial PDF of the Report at-https://www.researchreportsworld.com/enquiry/request-sample/21166626

The global Enterprise Streaming and Webcasting market is anticipated to rise at a considerable rate during the forecast period, between 2022 and 2029. The report screens the key models and market drivers in the two and for development situation and offers on the ground snippets of data. Enterprise Streaming and Webcasting Market Report will join the appraisal of the effect of COVID-19 on this industry.

Market Overview

The Enterprise Streaming and Webcasting market analysis provides a detailed analysis of global market size, regional and country-level market size, segmentation market growth, market share, competitive Landscape, sales analysis, impact of domestic and global market players, value chain optimization, trade regulations, accurate developments, opportunities analysis, strategic market growth analysis, product launches, area marketplace expanding, and technological innovations.

Market segmentation

Enterprise Streaming and Webcasting is split by Type and by Application. For the period 2012-2029, the growth among segments provide accurate calculations and forecasts for sales by Type and by Application in terms of volume and value. This analysis can help you expand your business by targeting qualified niche markets

Scope of the Report

  • The report analyses Enterprise Streaming and Webcasting by segment
  • The report assesses the Enterprise Streaming and Webcasting by end user
  • The Global Enterprise Streaming and Webcasting has been analysed by Region (Americas, Europe, Asia Pacific, Rest of the world) and by Country (United States, Europe, China, Japan, India, Southeast Asia, Latin America, Middle East and Africa, Others).
  • The key insights of the report have been presented through the frameworks of SWOT and Market Attractiveness charts. The attractiveness of the market has been presented by Region, Therapy and by End User. Additionally, the major opportunities, trends, drivers and challenges of the industry has been analysed in the report.
  • The report provides a detailed pipeline analysis of drugs being developed to cure the problem of atopic dermatitis.
  • The report tracks competitive developments, strategies, mergers and acquisitions and new product development. The companies analysed in the report include YunNan YunJing, Ilim Group, Winstone, Catalyst Paper, Harmac, Cascade, Gold River, Hu’nan Tiger Forest and Paper Group, Smurfit Kappa, Kamloops, Bowater, Aracruz, Celgar, Al-Pac, Potlatch, Suzano, Howe Sound, Yunnan FengHuang, Peace River, Northwood, Arauco, International Paper
  • The report presents the analysis of Enterprise Streaming and Webcasting for the historical period of 2017-2021 and the forecast period of 2022-2029

Get a trial Copy of the Enterprise Streaming and Webcasting Market Report 2022

List of TOP KEY PLAYERS in Enterprise Streaming and Webcasting Market Report are

  • STREAMSHARK
  • Kollective
  • Wistia
  • IBM
  • Arkena
  • VIMEO
  • Qumu
  • Agile Content
  • Viocorp
  • Vbrick
  • DACAST
  • Haivision
  • Ooyala
  • Vidizmo

On the basis of product, this report displays the production, revenue, price, market share and growth rate of each type, primarily split into

On the basis of the end users/applications, this report focuses on the status and outlook for major applications/end users, consumption (sales), market share and growth rate for each application, including

  • Finance
  • Manufacturing
  • Services
  • Health
  • Tech
  • Others

Enquire before purchasing this report –https://www.researchreportsworld.com/enquiry/pre-order-enquiry/21166626

Covid-19 Impact On Market –

Enterprise Streaming and Webcasting Market Forecast report gives required information regarding the total valuation that this industry holds presently, and it also lists the segmentation of the market along with the growth opportunities present across this business vertical. The Global Enterprise Streaming and Webcasting market growth report 2022 research provides a basic overview of the industry including definitions, classifications, applications and industry chain structure. Moreover, Consumer behaviour analysis and market dynamics like drivers, restraints, opportunities and provides crucial information for knowing the Enterprise Streaming and Webcasting market. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Enterprise Streaming and Webcasting market share, global consumer prices, and annual growth rate was also examined in the study.

To know How COVID-19 Pandemic Will Impact This Market/IndustryRequest a trial copy of the report –https://www.researchreportsworld.com/enquiry/request-covid19/21166626

Key Stakeholders

  • Raw material suppliers
  • Distributors/traders/wholesalers/suppliers
  • Regulatory bodies, including government agencies and NGO
  • Commercial research and development institutions
  • Importers and exporters
  • Government organizations, research organizations, and consulting firms
  • Trade associations and industry bodies
  • End-use industries

Why Buy This Report:

  • Detailed information on factors that will drive Enterprise Streaming and Webcasting market growth during the next five years
  • Estimation of the Enterprise Streaming and Webcasting market size and its contribution to the parent market
  • Predictions on upcoming trends and changes in consumer behaviour
  • The growth of the Enterprise Streaming and Webcasting market across United States, Europe, China, Japan, India, Southeast Asia, Latin America, Middle East and Africa.
  • Analysis of the market’s competitive landscape and detailed information on vendors
  • Comprehensive details of factors that will challenge the future growth of the Enterprise Streaming and Webcasting market vendors

Regions and Countries Level Analysis

Regional analysis is another highly comprehensive part of the research and analysis study of the global Enterprise Streaming and Webcasting presented in the report. This section sheds light on the sales growth of different regional and country-level Enterprise Streaming and Webcasting markets. For the historical and forecast period 2012 to 2029, it provides detailed and accurate country-wise volume analysis and region-wise market size analysis of the global Electrical Heating Cables market.

Geographically,the report includes the research on production, consumption, revenue, market share and growth rate, and forecast (2017 -2029) of the following regions:

  • United States
  • Europe (Germany, UK, France, Italy, Spain, Russia, Poland)
  • China
  • Japan
  • India
  • Southeast Asia (Malaysia, Singapore, Philippines, Indonesia, Thailand, Vietnam)
  • Latin America (Brazil, Mexico, Colombia)
  • Middle East and Africa (Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Turkey, Egypt, South Africa, Nigeria)
  • Other Regions

Years considered for this report:

Historical Years: 2017-2021

Base Year: 2021

Estimated Year: 2022

Forecast Period: 2022-2029

Purchase this report (Price 3450 USD for single user license)
https://www.researchreportsworld.com/purchase/21166626

Major Points from Table of Contents:

1 Enterprise Streaming and Webcasting Market Overview1.1 Product Overview and Scope of Enterprise Streaming and Webcasting
1.2 Enterprise Streaming and Webcasting Segment by Type
1.2.1 Global Enterprise Streaming and Webcasting Sales and CAGR Comparison by Type (2017-2029)
1.2.2 The Market Profile of Fluid Management system
1.2.3 The Market Profile of Fluid Management Disposables and Accessories
1.2.4 The Market Profile of Visualization System and Accessories Market
1.3 Global Enterprise Streaming and Webcasting Segment by Application
1.3.1 Enterprise Streaming and Webcasting Consumption (Sales) Comparison by Application (2017-2029)
1.3.2 The Market Profile of Neurology
1.3.3 The Market Profile of Laparoscopy
1.3.4 The Market Profile of Urology
1.3.5 The Market Profile of Arthroscopy

2 Global Enterprise Streaming and Webcasting Market Landscape by Player
2.1 Global Enterprise Streaming and Webcasting Sales and Share by Player (2017-2022)
2.2 Global Enterprise Streaming and Webcasting Revenue and Market Share by Player (2017-2022)
2.3 Global Enterprise Streaming and Webcasting Average Price by Player (2017-2022)
2.4 Global Enterprise Streaming and Webcasting Gross Margin by Player (2017-2022)
2.5 Enterprise Streaming and Webcasting Manufacturing Base Distribution, Sales Area and Product Type by Player
2.6 Enterprise Streaming and Webcasting Market Competitive Situation and Trends
2.6.1 Enterprise Streaming and Webcasting Market Concentration Rate
2.6.2 Enterprise Streaming and Webcasting Market Share of Top 3 and Top 6 Players
2.6.3 Mergers and Acquisitions, Expansion

3 Enterprise Streaming and Webcasting Upstream and Downstream Analysis
3.1 Enterprise Streaming and Webcasting Industrial Chain Analysis
3.2 Key Raw Materials Suppliers and Price Analysis
3.3 Key Raw Materials Supply and Demand Analysis
3.4 Manufacturing Process Analysis
3.5 Market Concentration Rate of Raw Materials
3.6 Downstream Buyers
3.7 Value Chain Status Under COVID-19

4 Enterprise Streaming and Webcasting Manufacturing Cost Analysis
4.1 Manufacturing Cost Structure Analysis
4.2 Enterprise Streaming and Webcasting Key Raw Materials Cost Analysis
4.2.1 Key Raw Materials Introduction
4.2.2 Price Trend of Key Raw Materials
4.3 Labor Cost Analysis
4.3.1 Labor Cost of Enterprise Streaming and Webcasting Under COVID-19
4.4 Energy Costs Analysis
4.5 RandD Costs Analysis

5 Market Dynamics
5.1 Drivers
5.2 Restraints and Challenges
5.3 Opportunities

6 Players Profiles
6.1.1 Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Competitors
6.1.2 Enterprise Streaming and Webcasting Product Profiles, Application and Specification
6.1.3 Enterprise Streaming and Webcasting Market Performance (2017-2022)
6.1.4 Business Overview

7 Global Enterprise Streaming and Webcasting Sales and Revenue Region Wise (2017-2022
7.1 Global Enterprise Streaming and Webcasting Sales and Market Share, Region Wise (2017-2022)
7.2 Global Enterprise Streaming and Webcasting Revenue (Revenue) and Market Share, Region Wise (2017-2022)
7.3 Global Enterprise Streaming and Webcasting Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2017-2022)
7.4 United States Enterprise Streaming and Webcasting Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2017-2022)
7.4.1 United States Enterprise Streaming and Webcasting Market Under COVID-19
7.5 Europe Enterprise Streaming and Webcasting Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2017-2022)
7.5.1 Europe Enterprise Streaming and Webcasting Market Under COVID-19
7.6 China Enterprise Streaming and Webcasting Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2017-2022)

8 Global Enterprise Streaming and Webcasting Sales, Revenue (Revenue), Price Trend by Type
8.1 Global Enterprise Streaming and Webcasting Sales and Market Share by Type (2017-2022)
8.2 Global Enterprise Streaming and Webcasting Revenue and Market Share by Type (2017-2022)
8.3 Global Enterprise Streaming and Webcasting Price by Type (2017-2022)
8.4 Global Enterprise Streaming and Webcasting Sales Growth Rate by Type (2017-2022)

9 Global Enterprise Streaming and Webcasting Market Analysis by Application
9.1 Global Enterprise Streaming and Webcasting Consumption and Market Share by Application (2017-2022)
9.2 Global Enterprise Streaming and Webcasting Consumption Growth Rate by Application (2017-2022)
9.2.1 Global Enterprise Streaming and Webcasting Consumption Growth Rate of Neurology (2017-2022)
9.2.2 Global Enterprise Streaming and Webcasting Consumption Growth Rate of Laparoscopy (2017-2022)
9.2.3 Global Enterprise Streaming and Webcasting Consumption Growth Rate of Urology (2017-2022)
9.2.4 Global Enterprise Streaming and Webcasting Consumption Growth Rate of Arthroscopy (2017-2022)

10 Global Enterprise Streaming and Webcasting Market Forecast (2022-2029)
10.1 Global Enterprise Streaming and Webcasting Sales, Revenue Forecast (2022-2029)
10.1.1 Global Enterprise Streaming and Webcasting Sales and Growth Rate Forecast (2022-2029)
10.1.2 Global Enterprise Streaming and Webcasting Revenue and Growth Rate Forecast (2022-2029)
10.1.3 Global Enterprise Streaming and Webcasting Price and Trend Forecast (2022-2029)
10.2 Global Enterprise Streaming and Webcasting Sales and Revenue Forecast, Region Wise (2022-2029)

11 Research Findings and Conclusion

12 Appendix
12.1 Methodology
12.2 Research Data Source

…………Continued

Browse complete table of contents at –https://www.researchreportsworld.com/TOC/21166626#TOC

About Us:

Research Reports World is the credible source for gaining the market reports that will provide you with the lead your business needs. At Research Reports World, our objective is providing a platform for many top-notch market research firms worldwide to publish their research reports, as well as helping the decision makers in finding most suitable market research solutions under one roof. Our aim is to provide the best solution that matches the exact customer requirements. This drives us to provide you with custom or syndicated research reports.

Contact Us:

Research Reports World

Phone:

US (+1) 424 253 0807

UK (+44) 203 239 8187

Email:[email protected]

Website:https://www.researchreportsworld.com/

Other Reports Here:

Benzophenone Ultraviolet Absorber Market Size 2022, Growth, Share, Company Profiles, Emerging Technologies, Trends, Segments Demand by Forecast to 2028

Glass Molding Market Size, Growth, Future Trends, Key Factors, Share, Demand, Manufacture Players and Opportunities Analysis by Outlook 2022-2028

Energy Security Market Size 2022, Share, Growth, Company Profiles, Competitive Landscape and Key Regions Analysis 2029

PET Compressors Market Size, Share, 2022 Global Industry Growth, Development, Revenue, Future Analysis, Business Prospects and Forecast to 2029

USB Interface Ics Market-2022 Industry Trends, Size, Growth Insight, Share, Emerging Technologies, Share, Competitive, Regional and Global Industry Forecast to 2028

Press Release Distributed by The Express Wire

To view the original version on The Express Wire visit Enterprise Streaming and Webcasting Market Size 2022, Trends, Growth Insight, Share, Competitive, Regional, And Global Industry Forecast to 2029

Wed, 27 Jul 2022 18:27:00 -0500 TheExpressWire en-US text/html https://www.digitaljournal.com/pr/enterprise-streaming-and-webcasting-market-size-2022-trends-growth-insight-share-competitive-regional-and-global-industry-forecast-to-2029
Killexams : Enterprise Workflow Automation Software Market – Major Technology Giants in Buzz Again : Ipsoft, Pegasystems, Software AG, Xerox

This press release was orginally distributed by SBWire

New Jersey, USA — (SBWIRE) — 07/30/2022 — The Latest Released Enterprise Workflow Automation Software market study has evaluated the future growth potential of Enterprise Workflow Automation Software market and provides information and useful stats on market structure and size. The report is intended to provide market intelligence and strategic insights to help decision makers take sound investment decisions and identify potential gaps and growth opportunities. Additionally, the report also identifies and analyses changing dynamics, emerging trends along with essential drivers, challenges, opportunities and restraints in Enterprise Workflow Automation Software market. The study includes market share analysis and profiles of players such as IBM Corporation (United States), Oracle Corporation (United States), Pegasystems Inc. (United States), Software AG (Germany), Xerox Corporation (United States), Appian Corporation (United States), Bizagi (United Kingdom), Ipsoft Inc. (United States), Newgen Software Technologies Limited (India), Nintex Global Limited (United States).

Download trial Report PDF (Including Full TOC, Table & Figures) @ https://www.advancemarketanalytics.com/sample-report/55191-global-enterprise-workflow-automation-software-market#utm_source=SBWireLal

Definition:
Enterprise workflow automation package allows the planning, execution, and automation of processes supported workflow rules wherever human tasks, data, or files between folks or systems are supported by a pre-defined organization code. This improves productivity, efficiency, and client expertise. money establishments, retail enterprises, and plenty of alternative industries are eliminating manual operational work and shifting the workflow to package. Enterprise workflow automation package eliminates manual work and reduces labor price.

Market Trends:
Integration of Advanced Technologies like Artificial Intelligence and Internet of Things

Market Opportunities:
Increasing Penetration of Smart Devices in Enterprise Work Procedure
Increasing Demand for Workflow Automation in Logistics and Supply Chain

The Global Enterprise Workflow Automation Software Market segments and Market Data Break Down are illuminated below:
by Enterprise Size (Small and Medium Enterprise, Large Enterprise), Industry Verticals (BSFI, Telecom & IT, Hospitality, Retail & Consumer Goods, Manufacturing & Logistics, Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals, Energy & utilities, Others), Deployment (Cloud-Based, On-Premise), Offering (Software, Services)

Global Enterprise Workflow Automation Software market report highlights information regarding the current and future industry trends, growth patterns, as well as it offers business strategies to helps the stakeholders in making sound decisions that may help to ensure the profit trajectory over the forecast years.

Have a query? Market an enquiry before purchase @ https://www.advancemarketanalytics.com/enquiry-before-buy/55191-global-enterprise-workflow-automation-software-market#utm_source=SBWireLal

Key Developments in the Market:
In 2021, DocuPhase LLC, a Florida-based low-code/no-code accounts payable (AP) and business process automation software company serving enterprise organizations, acquired Treeno Software, a Document Management and Workflow Automation software. This acquisition will complement the product portfolio of DocuPhase LLC in Software for Workflow automation and will cater to the high digitization of business processes.

Geographically, the detailed analysis of consumption, revenue, market share, and growth rate of the following regions:
The Middle East and Africa (South Africa, Saudi Arabia, UAE, Israel, Egypt, etc.)
North America (United States, Mexico & Canada)
South America (Brazil, Venezuela, Argentina, Ecuador, Peru, Colombia, etc.)
Europe (Turkey, Spain, Turkey, Netherlands Denmark, Belgium, Switzerland, Germany, Russia UK, Italy, France, etc.)
Asia-Pacific (Taiwan, Hong Kong, Singapore, Vietnam, China, Malaysia, Japan, Philippines, Korea, Thailand, India, Indonesia, and Australia).

Objectives of the Report
-To carefully analyze and forecast the size of the Enterprise Workflow Automation Software market by value and volume.
-To estimate the market shares of major segments of the Enterprise Workflow Automation Software
-To showcase the development of the Enterprise Workflow Automation Software market in different parts of the world.
-To analyze and study micro-markets in terms of their contributions to the Enterprise Workflow Automation Software market, their prospects, and individual growth trends.
-To offer precise and useful details about factors affecting the growth of the Enterprise Workflow Automation Software
-To provide a meticulous assessment of crucial business strategies used by leading companies operating in the Enterprise Workflow Automation Software market, which include research and development, collaborations, agreements, partnerships, acquisitions, mergers, new developments, and product launches.

Buy Complete Assessment of Enterprise Workflow Automation Software market Now @ https://www.advancemarketanalytics.com/buy-now?format=1&report=55191#utm_source=SBWireLal

Major highlights from Table of Contents:

Enterprise Workflow Automation Software Market Study Coverage:
It includes major manufacturers, emerging player's growth story, and major business segments of Enterprise Workflow Automation Software market, years considered, and research objectives. Additionally, segmentation on the basis of the type of product, application, and technology.
Enterprise Workflow Automation Software Market Executive Summary: It gives a summary of overall studies, growth rate, available market, competitive landscape, market drivers, trends, and issues, and macroscopic indicators.
Enterprise Workflow Automation Software Market Production by Region Enterprise Workflow Automation Software Market Profile of Manufacturers-players are studied on the basis of SWOT, their products, production, value, financials, and other vital factors.
Key Points Covered in Enterprise Workflow Automation Software Market Report:
Enterprise Workflow Automation Software Overview, Definition and Classification Market drivers and barriers
Enterprise Workflow Automation Software Market Competition by Manufacturers
Impact Analysis of COVID-19 on Enterprise Workflow Automation Software Market
Enterprise Workflow Automation Software Capacity, Production, Revenue (Value) by Region (2021-2027)
Enterprise Workflow Automation Software Supply (Production), Consumption, Export, Import by Region (2021-2027)
Enterprise Workflow Automation Software Production, Revenue (Value), Price Trend by Type
Enterprise Workflow Automation Software Market Analysis by Application
Enterprise Workflow Automation Software Manufacturers Profiles/Analysis Enterprise Workflow Automation Software Manufacturing Cost Analysis, Industrial/Supply Chain Analysis, Sourcing Strategy and Downstream Buyers, Marketing
Strategy by Key Manufacturers/Players, Connected Distributors/Traders Standardization, Regulatory and collaborative initiatives, Industry road map and value chain Market Effect Factors Analysis.

Browse Complete Summary and Table of Content @ https://www.advancemarketanalytics.com/reports/55191-global-enterprise-workflow-automation-software-market#utm_source=SBWireLal

Key questions answered
How feasible is Enterprise Workflow Automation Software market for long-term investment?
What are influencing factors driving the demand for Enterprise Workflow Automation Software near future?
What is the impact analysis of various factors in the Global Enterprise Workflow Automation Software market growth?
What are the accurate trends in the regional market and how successful they are?

Thanks for studying this article; you can also get individual chapter wise section or region wise report version like North America, Middle East, Africa, Europe or LATAM, Southeast Asia.

For more information on this press release visit: http://www.sbwire.com/press-releases/enterprise-workflow-automation-software-market-major-technology-giants-in-buzz-again-ipsoft-pegasystems-software-ag-xerox-1361413.htm

Sat, 30 Jul 2022 03:31:00 -0500 ReleaseWire en-US text/html https://www.digitaljournal.com/pr/enterprise-workflow-automation-software-market-major-technology-giants-in-buzz-again-ipsoft-pegasystems-software-ag-xerox
Killexams : TONE Acquires the CASI Suite of z/OS Output Transformation Products

Press release content from Globe Newswire. The AP news staff was not involved in its creation.

ANAHEIM, Calif., Aug. 02, 2022 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Tone Software Corporation, a global provider of management and productivity solutions for IBM Z mainframes, announced the acquisition of the JES2Mail, JES2FTP, Mail2ZOS, and CICS2PDF host output transformation and delivery products from CASI Software, Inc.

Collectively, both organizations have provided mission-critical z/OS infrastructure and output management solutions to hundreds of world-wide customers for decades. Effective June 1, 2022, the acquisition of the CASI JES2Mail suite will expand Tone’s OMC z/OS Output Management offerings for mainframe shops seeking to deliver the right information to the right users, in the most cost effective format for the business. Further, the combination of OMC with the CASI product suite enables legacy z/OS applications, including CICS transactional applications, to send host output directly to users’ email inboxes, in a familiar format that is highly portable and secure.

“Today’s mainframe environments are modernizing – particularly where output is concerned. Tone’s OMC products have long delivered output to host and TCP/IP attached printers and servers across the enterprise. While selective printing is always needed, z/OS output can be highly effective when delivered via email in PDF, spreadsheet, or custom report formats,” stated Shirley Balarezo, president of Tone Software.
“Acquiring the JES2Mail products positions Tone to help mainframe shops deliver host output in the most convenient format and media for each user, on the most cost efficient platform. The results are optimized business processes that modernize the mainframe environment for the future,” she concluded.

Customer Experience Takes Top Priority

Both organizations entered the acquisition deal with identical priorities top of mind: ensure current CASI customers enjoy full technology benefits and zero disruption to their ongoing product support needs. As such, the CASI management and technical teams are working directly with Tone throughout the next year to provide a smooth transition of products and services for all CASI users.

“We are pleased to enter into this agreement with Tone and provide a logical home for the JES2Mail/FTP, CICS2PDF, and Mail2ZOS products and customers,” stated Robert LaBayne, president and founder of CASI Software, Inc. “The acquisition will leverage our respective product capabilities, bring greater value to our z/OS customers, and provide a solid foundation for expanding CASI technologies going forward,” he added.

For further information on Tone’s acquisition of the CASI JES2Mail, JES2FTP, CICS2PDF, and Mail2ZOS products and customers, visit the Tone website: Tone Acquires CASI Products.

About Tone Software Corporation

Tone Software Corporation is a global provider of business computing software that addresses mainframe productivity, JES Spool management, dynamic STEPLIB and ISPF library management, cross-platform output management, TSO optimization and enterprise automation. Tone’s System Z solutions provide significant productivity and savings benefits to organizations, and directly benefit the IT teams responsible for managing, automating, supporting, and maintaining the critical z/OS host systems and applications pivotal to their company’s core mission. With a firm foundation of proven ability spanning more than four decades, TONE has built an unparalleled reputation for delivering premier software solutions and exceptional customer service and support 24 hours a day, 365 days a year. For information, visit www.tonesoft.com/mainframe.

Tracey Whitney
Tone Software Corporation
(714) 991-9460
info@tonesoft.com

 

Tue, 02 Aug 2022 00:03:00 -0500 en text/html https://apnews.com/press-release/globe-newswire/technology-software-1e43c8737607d58e96ca264a8ee764be
Killexams : Amazon, IBM Move Swiftly on Post-Quantum Cryptographic Algorithms Selected by NIST

A month after the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) revealed the first quantum-safe algorithms, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and IBM have swiftly moved forward. Google was also quick to outline an aggressive implementation plan for its cloud service that it started a decade ago.

It helps that IBM researchers contributed to three of the four algorithms, while AWS had a hand in two. Google contributed to one of the submitted algorithms, SPHINCS+.

A long process that started in 2016 with 69 original candidates ends with the selection of four algorithms that will become NIST standards, which will play a critical role in protecting encrypted data from the vast power of quantum computers.

NIST's four choices include CRYSTALS-Kyber, a public-private key-encapsulation mechanism (KEM) for general asymmetric encryption, such as when connecting websites. For digital signatures, NIST selected CRYSTALS-Dilithium, FALCON, and SPHINCS+. NIST will add a few more algorithms to the mix in two years.

Vadim Lyubashevsky, a cryptographer who works in IBM's Zurich Research Laboratories, contributed to the development of CRYSTALS-Kyber, CRYSTALS-Dilithium, and Falcon. Lyubashevsky was predictably pleased by the algorithms selected, but he had only anticipated NIST would pick two digital signature candidates rather than three.

Ideally, NIST would have chosen a second key establishment algorithm, according to Lyubashevsky. "They could have chosen one more right away just to be safe," he told Dark Reading. "I think some people expected McEliece to be chosen, but maybe NIST decided to hold off for two years to see what the backup should be to Kyber."

IBM's New Mainframe Supports NIST-Selected Algorithms

After NIST identified the algorithms, IBM moved forward by specifying them into its recently launched z16 mainframe. IBM introduced the z16 in April, calling it the "first quantum-safe system," enabled by its new Crypto Express 8S card and APIs that provide access to the NIST APIs.

IBM was championing three of the algorithms that NIST selected, so IBM had already included them in the z16. Since IBM had unveiled the z16 before the NIST decision, the company implemented the algorithms into the new system. IBM last week made it official that the z16 supports the algorithms.

Anne Dames, an IBM distinguished engineer who works on the company's z Systems team, explained that the Crypto Express 8S card could implement various cryptographic algorithms. Nevertheless, IBM was betting on CRYSTAL-Kyber and Dilithium, according to Dames.

"We are very fortunate in that it went in the direction we hoped it would go," she told Dark Reading. "And because we chose to implement CRYSTALS-Kyber and CRYSTALS-Dilithium in the hardware security module, which allows clients to get access to it, the firmware in that hardware security module can be updated. So, if other algorithms were selected, then we would add them to our roadmap for inclusion of those algorithms for the future."

A software library on the system allows application and infrastructure developers to incorporate APIs so that clients can generate quantum-safe digital signatures for both classic computing systems and quantum computers.

"We also have a CRYSTALS-Kyber interface in place so that we can generate a key and provide it wrapped by a Kyber key so that could be used in a potential key exchange scheme," Dames said. "And we've also incorporated some APIs that allow clients to have a key exchange scheme between two parties."

Dames noted that clients might use Kyber to generate digital signatures on documents. "Think about code signing servers, things like that, or documents signing services, where people would like to actually use the digital signature capability to ensure the authenticity of the document or of the code that's being used," she said.

AWS Engineers Algorithms Into Services

During Amazon's AWS re:Inforce security conference last week in Boston, the cloud provider emphasized its post-quantum cryptography (PQC) efforts. According to Margaret Salter, director of applied cryptography at AWS, Amazon is already engineering the NIST standards into its services.

During a breakout session on AWS' cryptography efforts at the conference, Salter said AWS had implemented an open source, hybrid post-quantum key exchange based on a specification called s2n-tls, which implements the Transport Layer Security (TLS) protocol across different AWS services. AWS has contributed it as a draft standard to the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF).

Salter explained that the hybrid key exchange brings together its traditional key exchanges while enabling post-quantum security. "We have regular key exchanges that we've been using for years and years to protect data," she said. "We don't want to get rid of those; we're just going to enhance them by adding a public key exchange on top of it. And using both of those, you have traditional security, plus post quantum security."

Last week, Amazon announced that it deployed s2n-tls, the hybrid post-quantum TLS with CRYSTALS-Kyber, which connects to the AWS Key Management Service (AWS KMS) and AWS Certificate Manager (ACM). In an update this week, Amazon documented its stated support for AWS Secrets Manager, a service for managing, rotating, and retrieving database credentials and API keys.

Google's Decade-Long PQC Migration

While Google didn't make implementation announcements like AWS in the immediate aftermath of NIST's selection, VP and CISO Phil Venables said Google has been focused on PQC algorithms "beyond theoretical implementations" for over a decade. Venables was among several prominent researchers who co-authored a technical paper outlining the urgency of adopting PQC strategies. The peer-reviewed paper was published in May by Nature, a respected journal for the science and technology communities.

"At Google, we're well into a multi-year effort to migrate to post-quantum cryptography that is designed to address both immediate and long-term risks to protect sensitive information," Venables wrote in a blog post published following the NIST announcement. "We have one goal: ensure that Google is PQC ready."

Venables recalled an experiment in 2016 with Chrome where a minimal number of connections from the Web browser to Google servers used a post-quantum key-exchange algorithm alongside the existing elliptic-curve key-exchange algorithm. "By adding a post-quantum algorithm in a hybrid mode with the existing key exchange, we were able to test its implementation without affecting user security," Venables noted.

Google and Cloudflare announced a "wide-scale post-quantum experiment" in 2019 implementing two post-quantum key exchanges, "integrated into Cloudflare's TLS stack, and deployed the implementation on edge servers and in Chrome Canary clients." The experiment helped Google understand the implications of deploying two post-quantum key agreements with TLS.

Venables noted that last year Google tested post-quantum confidentiality in TLS and found that various network products were not compatible with post-quantum TLS. "We were able to work with the vendor so that the issue was fixed in future firmware updates," he said. "By experimenting early, we resolved this issue for future deployments."

Other Standards Efforts

The four algorithms NIST announced are an important milestone in advancing PQC, but there's other work to be done besides quantum-safe encryption. The AWS TLS submission to the IETF is one example; others include such efforts as Hybrid PQ VPN.

"What you will see happening is those organizations that work on TLS protocols, or SSH, or VPN type protocols, will now come together and put together proposals which they will evaluate in their communities to determine what's best and which protocols should be updated, how the certificates should be defined, and things like things like that," IBM's Dames said.

Dustin Moody, a mathematician at NIST who leads its PQC project, shared a similar view during a panel discussion at the RSA Conference in June. "There's been a lot of global cooperation with our NIST process, rather than fracturing of the effort and coming up with a lot of different algorithms," Moody said. "We've seen most countries and standards organizations waiting to see what comes out of our nice progress on this process, as well as participating in that. And we see that as a very good sign."

Thu, 04 Aug 2022 10:39:00 -0500 en text/html https://www.darkreading.com/dr-tech/amazon-ibm-move-swiftly-on-post-quantum-cryptographic-algorithms-selected-by-nist
M8010-241 exam dump and training guide direct download
Training Exams List