HPE2-Z38 PDF Braindumps are updated today. Just download

This particular is merely a high acceleration track to move HPE2-Z38 test in the quickest time. During twenty-four hours. Killexams.com offer HPE2-Z38 PDF Braindumps to consider before you determine to register plus download full edition containing complete HPE2-Z38 mock exam queries bank. Read plus Memorize HPE2-Z38 Test Prep, practice with HPE2-Z38 test VCE and gowns all.

Exam Code: HPE2-Z38 Practice test 2022 by Killexams.com team
HPE2-Z38 Creating HPE Software-defined Networks

• Explain what Software-Defined Networking (SDN) is in broad terms
• Describe campus, datacenter, and cloud SDN solutions
• Describe HPE VAN SDN Controller requirements, architecture, and features
• Integrate Mininet with the HPE VAN SDN Controller
• Explain features and functionality of HPE SDN applications:
– Network protector SDN application
– Network visualizer SDN application
– Network optimizer for Microsoft Lync®
• Explain the OpenFlow protocol
• Use cURL to interact with the Controller REST API
• Configure Controller high-availability

Exam Objectives | Course Outline | Syllabus
Module 0: Course introduction • Course overview
• Course design
• Course objectives
• What do you want to learn in this course?
• Course agenda
• How about the Labs?
• HPE ExpertOne
• Augmented reality… Whats in it for you?
Module 1: Software-Defined Networking
Introduction
• Objectives
• Legacy networks
• Server virtualization and innovation
• A new (virtualized) style of network control
• Multiple SDN views
• OpenFlow versions
• Traditional switching
• Flow-based switching
• SDN architecture
• OpenFlow switch
• Proactive versus reactive flows
• HPE networking is empowering the Enterprise
• Enterprises are moving to a New Style of IT
• Journey to Software-Defined Networking
• HPE commitment to Open SDN
• Making it easy for customers
• Lab activity 1.1: Reset switches and configure initial settings
• Lab activity 1.1: Debrief
• Lab activity 1.2: Basic switch configuration
• Lab activity 1.2: Debrief
• Lab activity 1.3: UserVM configuration
• Lab activity 1.3: Debrief
• Summary
• Learning check
• Learning check answers
Module 2: SDN case studies • Objectives
• HPE SDN app store
• HPE SDN ecosystem
• App store circles
• OpenDayLight (ODL)
• HPE applications
• HPE network protector SDN application
• Dashboard
• HPE network optimizer SDN application
• HPE network optimizer SDN application
• HPE network optimizer-Dashboard
• Current troubleshooting tools challenges
• HPE network visualizer benefits
• Bluecat DNS director
• Kemp LoadMaster
• HPE SDN case studies
• Lab activity 2.1: RFI
• Lab activity 2.2: Case studies
• What is NFV?
• SDN in the data center and cloud
• HPE-VMware networking solution
• VMware NSX
• Integration and communication
• HPE Virtual Cloud Networking (VCN)
• HPE VCN components
• HPE Helion OpenStack and CloudSystem
• HPE Distributed Cloud Networking (DCN)
• HPE Distributed Cloud Networking (DCN) (continued)
• DCN: Solving the following table stakes
• Summary
Module 3: HPE VAN SDN Controller overview • Objectives
• Overview of the HPE VAN SDN Controller
• HPE VAN SDN Controller documentation
• Lab activity 3.1: Support Matrix
• Lab activity 3.1: Debrief
• Lab 3.1: Review activity
• Controller modes
• Controller authentication
• New install with a local Keystone server
• 1—Installing the Keystone server
• 1—Installing the Keystone server (continued)
• 2—Unpacking the controller software
• 2—Verifying hardware requirements
• 2—Override hardware check
• 3—Install controller and verify
• 3—Install controller and verify (continued)
• 4—Configure a user-local Keystone server
• 5—Verifying the NTP configuration
• Lab activity 3.2, 3.3, and 3.4
• Lab activity 3.2, 3.3, 3.4: Debrief
• Labs 3.2, 3.3, and 3.4: Review activity
• Mininet overview
• Linear topology
• Mininet ping
• Linear topology result
• Easy to read MAC addresses
• Mininet options
• Lab activity 3.5: Mininet lab
• Lab activity 3.5: Debrief
• Labs 3.5: Review activity
• Installing a new application via the app store
• Installing a new application (continued)
• Installing a new application (continued)
• Installing a new application (continued)
• Installing a new application—Local install
• Lab activity 3.6: SDN application installation
• Lab activity 3.6: Debrief
• Labs 3.6: Review activity
• Lab activity 3.7: Debrief
• ProVision—OpenFlow configuration
• Comware—OpenFlow configuration
• Lab activity 3.8: Adding flows
• Lab activity 3.8: Debrief
• Labs 3.8: Review activity
• Lab activity 3.8: Debrief
• Summary
• Learning check
Module 4: HPE Network Protector SDN application
• Objectives
• Overview
• HPE TippingPoint reputation DV service
• Service insertion tunnels
• Installation
• Lab activity 4.1: Network Protector installation
• Lab activity 4.1: Debrief
• Lab 4.1: Review activity
• Lab 4.1: Review activity (continued)
• Lab 4.1: Review activity (continued)
• HPE VAN SDN Controller licenses
• HPE Network Protector SDN licenses
• HPE Network Protector URLs
• Network Protector Setup Wizard
• Network Protector Setup Wizard (continued)
• Network Protector Setup Wizard (continued)
• Lab Activity 4.2: Controller and application licensing
• Lab Activity 4.2 Debrief
• Activity 4.2.1: How many licenses are required?
• Activity 4.2.2: How many licenses are required? (continued)
• Activity 4.2.3: How many licenses are required? (continued)
• Activity 4.2.4: Lab review
• Switch configuration
• Switch configuration (continued)
• Network protector console
• Device status panel
• Integration
• VLAN status
• Lab activity 4.3: Network protector integration
• Lab activity 4.3: Debrief
• Lab 4.3: Lab review activity
• Redirection server
• Redirection server (continued)
• Redirection server (continued)
• Lab activity 4.4: Redirection server
• Lab activity 4.4: Debrief
• Lab 4.4: Review activity
• Groups
• Custom Blacklists
• Lab activity 4.5: Network protector groups and custom Blacklist
• Lab activity 4.5: Debrief
• Lab 4.5: Review activity
• Greylists
• Lab activity 4.6: Basic network protector custom Greylist
• Lab activity 4.6: Debrief
• Lab 4.6: Review activity
• Custom Whitelists
• Lab Activity 4.7: Network protector custom Whitelist
• Lab activity 4.7: Debrief
• Lab 4.7: Review activity
• Quality of Service
• Quality of Service (continued)
• Lab activity 4.8: Quality of Service
• Lab activity 4.8: Debrief
• ACL manager
• ACL manager (continued)
• Lab activity 4.9: ACL manager
• Lab activity 4.9: Debrief
• Lab activity 4.10: Private VLAN example
• Lab activity 4.10: Debrief
• Labs 4.9 and 4.10: Review activity
• Summary
• Learning check
• Learning check answers
Module 5: HPE Network Visualizer SDN application • Objectives
• HPE Network Visualizer SDN app–visibility
• HPE Network Visualizer key features
• Installation
• Lab activity 5.1: Network Visualizer installation
• Lab activity 5.1: Debrief
• Lab 5.1: Review activity
• SNMP
• Switch configuration
• Switch configuration (continued)
• Capture destinations
• Custom mode capture
• Custom mode capture (continued)
• Custom mode capture (continued)
• Custom mode capture (continued)
• Session monitor
• Real-time traffic
• Network Visualizer dashboard
• Lab activity 5.2: Network Visualizer physical switch integratio
n • Lab activity 5.2: Debrief
• Open vSwitch
• Lab activity 5.3: Start two capture sessions simultaneously
• Lab activity 5.3: Debrief
• Active directory integration
• Users
• Capture session—User mode
• Capture session—User mode (continued)
• Anonymity mode
• Summary
• Learning check
• Learning check answers
Module 6: OpenFlow Deep Dive • Objectives
• Open networking foundation
• Main components of an OpenFlow switch
• OpenFlow channel
• OpenFlow ports
• OpenFlow messages
• Symmetric OpenFlow messages
• Lab activity 6.1: OpenFlow Deep Dive part 1
• Lab activity 6.1: Debrief
• Lab 6.1: Review activity
• OpenFlow channel
• OpenFlow messages—Controller to switch
• OpenFlow messages—Controller to switch (continued)
• Messages—Asynchronous
• Multiple table pipeline processing
• Pipeline processing for flow tables
• Multiple tables
• Instructions
• Lab activity 6.2: OpenFlow Deep Dive part 2
• Lab activity 6.2: Debrief
• Lab 6.2: Review activity
• Lab 6.2: Review activity (continued)
• Auxiliary connections
• Spanning Tree and OpenFlow
• Spanning Tree and OpenFlow (continued)
• Lab activity 6.3: OpenFlow Deep Dive part 3
• Lab activity 6.3: Debrief
• ProVision configuration
• ProVision output
• Controller view: LAG links
• Optional lab activity 6.4: Link aggregation
• Lab activity 6.4: Debrief
• OpenFlow channel
• OpenFlow link discovery
• OpenFlow link discovery (continued)
• OpenFlow link discovery (continued)
• OpenFlow link discovery (continued)
• Lab activity 6.5: Link and node discovery using OpenFlow
• Lab activity 6.5: Debrief
• Group action and group table
• Creating multiple abstract distribution Trees
• Forwarding on redundant paths (load-balancing)
• Forwarding on redundant paths (active/standby)
• Abstracting a port
• Summary
• Objectives
• HPE VAN SDN Controller APIs
• Why you need to use the REST API
• RESTful application program interface (API)
• SDN Controller REST API security
• RSdoc discovery
• RSdoc discovery—Datapaths
• RSdoc discovery—Authentication
• Retrieve token via RSdoc
• Retrieve token via RSDoc (continued)
• Paste token and click explore
• REST API call successful
• REST API response
• REST API authentication
• Example: Retrieving token via cURL
• Use cURL to query Controller REST API
• Activity: cURL commands
• Lab activity 7: REST API
• Lab activity 7: Debrief
• Lab 7: Review activity
• Summary
• Learning check
• Learning check answers
Module 8: High-availability • Objectives
• Standalone Controller
• Lab activity 8.1: Test result of a single controller failure
• Lab activity 8.1: Debrief
• Lab 8.1: Review activity
• Controller High-availability
• Team leader
• Controller fault tolerance
• Controller fault tolerance (continued)
• Controller status
• Team creation process
• REST API authentication
• Team configuration
• View team
• Controller team information
• Lab activity 8.2: Create a team of HPE VAN SDN Controllers
• Lab activity 8.2: Debrief
• Lab 8.2: Review activity
• Regions
• REST API authentication
• Region configuration
• View regions
• Comware configuration
• ProVision configuration
• View owners
• Lab Activity 8.3: Integrate HPE switches with a team of HPE Controllers
• Lab Activity 8.3: Debrief
• Lab 8.3 Review activity
• Lab 8.3 Review activity (continued)
• Summary
• Learning check
• Learning check answers

Creating HPE Software-defined Networks
HP Software-defined study help
Killexams : HP Software-defined study help - BingNews https://killexams.com/pass4sure/exam-detail/HPE2-Z38 Search results Killexams : HP Software-defined study help - BingNews https://killexams.com/pass4sure/exam-detail/HPE2-Z38 https://killexams.com/exam_list/HP Killexams : Software Defined Data Center (SDDC) Market Growth, Trends and CAGR Status and Forecast to 2025

The MarketWatch News Department was not involved in the creation of this content.

Jul 08, 2022 (Market Insight Reports) -- The ‘Software Defined Data Center (SDDC) market’ research report now available with Market Study Report is a compilation of pivotal insights pertaining to market size, competitive spectrum, geographical outlook, contender share, and consumption trends of this industry. The report also highlights the key drivers and challenges influencing the revenue graph of this vertical along with strategies adopted by distinguished players to enhance their footprints in the Software Defined Data Center (SDDC) market.

Request a sample Report at:https://www.marketstudyreport.com/request-a-sample/2452517?utm_source=Marketwatch.com&utm_medium=Ram

Market Overview

The global Software Defined Data Center (SDDC) market size is expected to gain market growth in the forecast period of 2020 to 2025, with a CAGR of 18.1% in the forecast period of 2020 to 2025 and will expected to reach 53590 million by 2025, from 27580 million in 2019.

The Software Defined Data Center (SDDC) market report provides a detailed analysis of global market size, regional and country-level market size, segmentation market growth, market share, competitive Landscape, sales analysis, impact of domestic and global market players, value chain optimization, trade regulations, exact developments, opportunities analysis, strategic market growth analysis, product launches, area marketplace expanding, and technological innovations.

Market segmentation

Software Defined Data Center (SDDC) market is split by Type and by Application. For the period 2015-2025, the growth among segments provide accurate calculations and forecasts for sales by Type and by Application in terms of volume and value. This analysis can help you expand your business by targeting qualified niche markets.

By Type, Software Defined Data Center (SDDC) market has been segmented into:

Software-Defined Computing (SDC)

Software-Defined Networking (SDN)

Software-Defined Storage (SDS)

Other

By Application, Software Defined Data Center (SDDC) has been segmented into:

Telecom & IT

BFSI

Education

Consumer Goods & Retail

Healthcare

Government & Defense

Other

Regions and Countries Level Analysis

Regional analysis is another highly comprehensive part of the research and analysis study of the global Software Defined Data Center (SDDC) market presented in the report. This section sheds light on the sales growth of different regional and country-level Software Defined Data Center (SDDC) markets. For the historical and forecast period 2015 to 2025, it provides detailed and accurate country-wise volume analysis and region-wise market size analysis of the global Software Defined Data Center (SDDC) market.

The report offers in-depth assessment of the growth and other aspects of the Software Defined Data Center (SDDC) market in important countries (regions), including:

North America (United States, Canada and Mexico)

Europe (Germany, France, UK, Russia and Italy)

Asia-Pacific (China, Japan, Korea, India, Southeast Asia and Australia)

South America (Brazil, Argentina, Colombia)

Middle East and Africa (Saudi Arabia, UAE, Egypt, Nigeria and South Africa)

Competitive Landscape and Software Defined Data Center (SDDC) Market Share Analysis

Software Defined Data Center (SDDC) competitive landscape provides details by vendors, including company overview, company total revenue (financials), market potential, global presence, Software Defined Data Center (SDDC) sales and revenue generated, market share, price, production sites and facilities, SWOT analysis, product launch. For the period 2015-2020, this study provides the Software Defined Data Center (SDDC) sales, revenue and market share for each player covered in this report.

The major players covered in Software Defined Data Center (SDDC) are:

Microsoft

NEC

Cisco Systems

IBM

Citrix Systems

HP

Juniper Networks

VMware

Dell EMC

Fujitsu

Western Digital

Enquiry about report at:https://www.marketstudyreport.com/enquiry-before-buying/2452517?utm_source=Marketwatch.com&utm_medium=Ram

Objectives of the Report

-To carefully analyze and forecast the size of the market by value and volume.

-To estimate the market shares of major segments of the Market

-To showcase the development of the market in different parts of the world.

-To analyze and study micro-markets in terms of their contributions to the market, their prospects, and individual growth trends.

-To offer precise and useful details about factors affecting the growth of the Market

-To provide a meticulous assessment of crucial business strategies used by leading companies operating in the Market, which include research and development, collaborations, agreements, partnerships, acquisitions, mergers, new developments, and product launches.

Key questions answered in the report:

  • What will the growth rate of Market?
  • What are the key factors driving the global Market?
  • Who are the key manufacturers in Market?
  • What are the market opportunities, risk and overview of the Global Market?
  • What are sales, revenue, and price analysis of top manufacturers of Global Market?

About Us:

Market Study Report is a hub for market intelligence products and services. We streamline the purchase of your market research reports and services through a single integrated platform by bringing all the major publishers and their services at one place. Our customers partner with Market Study Report to ease their search and evaluation of market intelligence products and services and in turn focus on their company’s core activities. If you are looking for research reports on global or regional markets, competitive information, emerging markets, and trends or just looking to stay on top of the curve then Market Study Report. is the platform that can help you in achieving any of these objectives.

About Us:

Corporate Sales,

Market Study Report

Phone: 1-302-273-0910

Toll Free: 1-866-764-2150

Email:sales@marketstudyreport.com

COMTEX_409868884/2599/2022-07-08T13:20:22

Is there a problem with this press release? Contact the source provider Comtex at editorial@comtex.com. You can also contact MarketWatch Customer Service via our Customer Center.

The MarketWatch News Department was not involved in the creation of this content.

Fri, 08 Jul 2022 07:18:00 -0500 en-US text/html https://www.marketwatch.com/press-release/software-defined-data-center-sddc-market-growth-trends-and-cagr-status-and-forecast-to-2025-2022-07-08
Killexams : How HP Designers Think About Sustainable PCs

A visit to HP’s Design Studio, where the team takes creative leaps and deliberate steps in the quest for good-looking and eco-positive products.

Northampton, MA --News Direct-- HP Inc.

Stacy Wolff outside the CMF (colors, materials, fabric) library.

In a conference room at HP’s Silicon Valley campus, a cornucopia of materials is placed all around. On the table and walls are swatches in fashion-forward colors (teal green, scarlet, rose gold) and novel textures (mycelium foam, crushed seashells, recycled rubber from running tracks, fabric from recycled jeans). Even more unexpected: pairs of high-end athletic shoes, and lots of them; luggage and backpacks, teapots and totes; stacks of gorgeous coffee-table books on subjects ranging from furniture to architecture — all to inspire the look and feel of devices that HP has yet to imagine.

Being able to touch, test, and debate about these items in person is part of the process, a creative collaboration Global Head of Design & Sustainability Stacy Wolff and his talented team of designers are grateful to be able to do side by side again inside their light-filled studio in Palo Alto. With each iteration of an HP laptop, desktop, or gaming rig, they endeavor to push the bounds of sustainable design while offering consumers a device that they’re proud to use each day.

For the last few years, HP’s design work has gained recognition, evidenced by the studio’s gleaming rows of awards. But there’s not a single name listed on any of them. “Everything we do is by collective effort. We win as a group, and we lose as a group,” says Wolff. “If you won an award, someone else had to do maybe a less glamorous job to provide you the freedom to do that.”

The team of 73 creatives in California, Houston, and Taipei are from backgrounds as varied as design, engineering, graphics, anthropology, poetry, ergonomics, and sports journalism. There’s one thing they have in common, though. Disagreements are dealt with by amping up their communication and doubling down on what they know to be their source of truth. “If we let the customer be the North Star, it tends to resolve almost all conflict,” Wolff says.

HP’s head of design has led a massive shift in how HP approaches design since its split from HPE in 2015, steering the company toward a more unified, yet distinct, visual identity, and a willingness to experiment with both luxury and mass-market trends. Wolff’s team is responsible for delivering the award-winning HP Spectre and ENVY lines, including the HP Spectre 13 (at the time of launch, hailed as the world’s thinnest laptop); the HP Spectre Folio (the first laptop with a leather chassis); the HP ENVY Wood series (made with sustainably-sourced, genuine wood inlays); and the HP Elite Dragonfly (the world’s first notebook to use ocean-bound plastic). Among the honors: In 2021, HP received seven Green Good Design Awards from the European Centre for Architecture Art Design and Urban Studies and the Chicago Athenaeum: Museum of Architecture and Design.

Today, Wolff and his team are in their recently outfitted studio, which opened late last year in HP’s Palo Alto headquarters. In the common areas, there is an inviting atmosphere of warm wood and soft, textured surfaces. Designers are tapping away at their keyboards, breaking off to share quick sketches and notes in an informal huddle around a digital whiteboard. In the gallery — an airy space that looks a lot like an upscale retail store — foam models, proof-of concept designs, and an array of laptop parts, keycaps, speakers, and circuit boards are splayed out on stark white countertops. Light from the courtyard pours in from the floor-to-ceiling windows.

“The studio has become a home,” says Wolff, who’s been with the company for 27 years. “When you think about a house, where does everybody go? Where is the love, and creation, and the stories being told? All that is shared in the kitchen.”

Granted this kitchen also has a really, really nice espresso maker.

The new space, like the kitchen, bubbles with energy and fuels the collaborative process, which was somewhat stifled when everyone was working remotely. “Creativity is a magical thing,” Wolff says. “That’s why it’s so important to design in a common space. We took for granted the process of organic product development. When you work from home, it becomes almost serial development. There’s no serendipity.”

After months of improvising the tools they needed to work together, the team finds that being back in the office is where they can be most creative and efficient. “Designers are very hands-on,” says Kevin Massaro, vice president of consumer design. “Everything in the studio is tactile.”

Yet, the time spent working remotely produced valuable insights that are informing future products, such as a PC camera disaggregated from the monitor so it can be manipulated to capture something on a person’s desk (like a sketch); super-wide-screen displays with integrated light bars that offer a soft backlight for people working late at night; and monitors that adjust to taller heights, to better accommodate a standing desk.

In exact years, the team has also turned its sights toward defining — and redefining — what sustainable design means for HP. In 2021 HP announced some of the most aggressive and comprehensive climate goals in the technology industry, bringing new complexity — and new gravitas — to what Wolff and his team are aiming to accomplish.

“You’re no longer just a company that’s manufacturing technology, you’re a company that’s helping to better people’s lives,” Wolff says. Working toward HP’s goal to become the most sustainable and just technology company is less about integrating greater percentages of recycled materials into new products, and more about an accounting of the entire life cycle of a device, from the electricity used over its lifetime and the minerals mined for its batteries, to the chemicals used in its painted powder coating and what exactly happens to a product when returned for recycling.

When a customer opens a box made of 100% recycled molded fiber packaging to reveal the premium Elite Dragonfly PC, which made waves for being the first notebook with ocean-bound plastic, that’s where this team’s efforts become tangible.

The Dragonfly isn’t only a triumph of design, it proved that circularity can be an integral part of mass-manufacturing for personal electronics. The third generation of that same device, released in March (see “How the HP Elite Dragonfly Took Flight,” page 36), raised the bar for battery life and weight with a new process that fuses aluminum and magnesium in the chassis, the latter of which is both lightweight and 100% recyclable.

This was a feat of engineering alchemy, says Chad Paris, Global Senior Design Manager. “Not only do you have different properties of how these metals work together, it was a challenge to make sure that it’s seamless,” he says. The team innovated and came up with a thermofusion process that lends a premium feel to the Dragonfly while keeping its weight at just a kilogram.

This inventiveness dovetails with Wolff’s pragmatic approach to sustainability. Not only does each change have to scale for a manufacturer the size of HP, it has to strike the right balance between brand integrity and forward-leaning design. “We can take waste and make great things,” Wolff says, gesturing at a pile of uniform plastic pellets that used to be a discarded bottle. “But ultimately, we want our products to live longer, so we’re designing them to have second lives.”

A sustainable HP notebook, no matter what materials it’s made from, needs to look and feel like HP made it, says Sandie Cheng, Global CMF Director. The CMF (colors, materials, finishes) library holds thousands of fabric swatches, colored tiles, and paint chips and samples, which Cheng uses as inspiration for the look and feel of fine details such as the touch pad on a laptop, the smooth glide of a hinge, or the sparkle of the HP logo peeking through a laser-etched cutout.

Cheng and her team head out on scouting trips to gather objects from a variety of places and bring them back to the studio, composing their own ever-changing mood board. In the CMF library, there are Zen-like ceramic-and-bamboo vessels picked up from an upscale housewares boutique in San Francisco alongside scores of upholstery samples in chic color palettes, hunks of charred wood, and Nike’s Space Hippie trainers.

Most of these materials will never make it to production, but they offer up a rich playground for the team’s collective imagination. Foam made from mycelium (i.e., fungi threads) is an organic material that can be grown in just two weeks. Perhaps one day it could be used as material to cover the Dragonfly chassis, even if right now it couldn’t survive the daily wear and tear we put on our PCs. Or its spongy, earthy texture might inspire a new textile that lends a softer feel to an otherwise hard-edged device on your desk.

“We as designers have to think outside the box to stay creative and inspired, but we also have to develop materials that can be used for production,” Cheng says. “It’s a balance of staying creative and also being realistic.”

The same holds true for how the materials are made. Manufacturing with fabric is notorious for producing massive amounts of waste because of the way patterns are cut, but HP wants to change that with its own soft goods, such as the HP Renew Sleeve. It’s made with 96% recycled plastic bottle material, and importantly, the 3D knitting process used to make the laptop sleeve leaves virtually zero waste, generating only a few stray threads.

Earlier this month, Cheng and her team went to Milan, Italy, for fresh inspiration. They attended Salone del Mobile 2022, one of the industry’s largest textile, furniture, and home design trade shows, to get a sense of the big design trends of the next few years, including what Cheng calls “the centered home,” which evokes feelings of comfort, coziness, and calm.

She explains that the blurring of work and life means that what consumers want in their next device, whether it’s one issued by their company or selected from a store shelf, is something that looks and feels like it fits into their personal spaces. “Your PC should be really versatile and adapt to whichever environment you’re in and how you want to use it,” she says.

Consumers also want to feel good about their purchase, which increasingly means choosing brands that care for the finite resources on our shared planet. A 2021 report by research firm IDC found that 43% of 1,000 decision-makers said sustainability was a critical factor in their tech-buying choices.

As the Personal Systems designers charge ahead into a sustainable future — whatever it brings — they’ll surely do it in their iterative, measured, and collaborative way.

“When it comes to sustainability, it’s all about forward progress, and everyone’s job is a sustainability job,” Wolff says. “As founder Dave Packard said, ‘The betterment of our society is not a job to be left to the few. It’s a responsibility to be shared by all.’”

View additional multimedia and more ESG storytelling from HP Inc. on 3blmedia.com

View source version on newsdirect.com: https://newsdirect.com/news/how-hp-designers-think-about-sustainable-pcs-440842278

Wed, 06 Jul 2022 03:20:00 -0500 en-US text/html https://finance.yahoo.com/news/hp-designers-think-sustainable-pcs-151009878.html
Killexams : Best monitors for programming in 2022

Published Jun 30, 2022 7:00 AM

Programming and living behind a screen are basically synonymous, so for high-quality coding and study you deserve comfort and an optimized monitor is a great place to start. While the stereotype of the hacking coder, slouched into a chair, wearing a hoodie, and blasting their eyes with a bright screen in a dark room is fun to think about, the result will only be a horrible experience.

Instead, if you’re a real coder of today, you probably realize that you have a long, steady career ahead of you. Increased comfort and feeling good on the job will lead to a fruitful workday and a clear head, ready to innovate. With work from home not going anywhere soon, especially in the knowledge work sector, it is falling more and more on the shoulders of the worker to get their own computer equipment. As a result, we invite you to consider upgrading your life with one of our best monitors for programming picks.

How we selected the best monitors for programming

Staring at screens, typing out notes, and looking through comparison tables is something both the writer and the programmer handle on a daily basis, so personal experience helped guide this guide. Discussing the matter of picking a monitor with software engineers themselves helps too, of course, with key concerns including size and resolution. I also looked at user impressions, their concerns, and what critics see as coming trends, such as more working from home; for these reasons, I adjusted toward results that prioritize comfort and eye health after long-term usage.

Ultimately, good monitors for programming are good monitors for computing. Expect to see some overlap in how programming monitors are evaluated with other categories of monitor, such as gaming monitors and trading monitors, etc. The key differences, such as being used for work activities with less chances of a break, are going to be where we put in a significant portion of our comparison efforts, but a good monitor will always be a good monitor.

Things to consider before buying monitors for programming

Getting monitors for programming, much like getting monitors for home offices, can be tricky because you’ll want the monitor to be good for other purposes, too. Luckily, many of the factors that translate to being one of the best monitors for programming, also make for great general monitors. For example, programmers are likely to care a lot about size but people watching Netflix aren’t complaining about monitors being too big. We’ll examine all of the big factors in this sort of multimodal way, including resolution and comfort.

Size

This one is relatively straightforward. In almost every case, bigger is better. The ability to have multiple windows open at the same time and look at things side-by-side cannot be overstated. Moving your head from one monitor to another can make direct comparisons tricky, whereas having everything ready at a glance will help keep you in a happy programming flow state.

While there are some people that might look at a very large screen and feel overwhelmed, it is easy to make your windows smaller and focus on what is important. You cannot do this the other way around—making windows larger than the screen to be more comfortable. Getting something a tad bigger than you’re used to will likely go fine, you’ll get acclimated to the larger size, but going too small will trap you in.

So, when might it be bad to have a larger monitor? When the monitor is so big that it pushes out your other monitors. Sure, the advantages of side-by-side comparison given by a large monitor are important, but that doesn’t mean that having the ability to throw something up in full screen on another monitor is less important. Finding balance and what works appropriately with your given desk space is critical.

Resolution

In the world of movies, we always seem to see blocky, pixelated coding text. The real world won’t have it. Resolution is the most important factor for getting a crisp, easy to look at picture out of your monitor. The higher the resolution, the more pixels you’ll see in a given patch of monitor space.

Resolution is defined by both numbers and letters, which can be somewhat confusing. The numbers provide a studying of the pixels shown, horizontally and vertically. For example, a resolution of 1920 x 1080 shows 1920 pixels from right to left and 1080 pixels from top to bottom. Resolution numbers are often abbreviated to just show the vertical number—1920 x 1080 is known in this system as 1080p.

Letter abbreviations are also commonly used. Some of the most common abbreviations are as follows: FHD (Full High Definition) is 1920 x 1080; QHD (Quad High Definition) is 2560 x 1440; and UHD (Ultra High Definition) is 3840 x 2160. Interestingly, despite only getting to 3,840 pixels wide, this is commonly referred to as 4K.

So, what resolution is good for programming? This is another case of the bigger, the better, but we recommend going for at least 1080p, with 1440p and higher offering the best experience. One often unmentioned, but nonetheless worthy, note is that your desktop space changes with your resolution. So, if you’re the type of programmer with about 40 to 50 files and folders on your desktop, plus a dozen or so game shortcuts, then you’ll definitely want to be opting for the highest resolution possible!

Comfort

It’s a sad fact but you’re probably going to be working more often than you’d like to be. Be comfortable while you do it. For this review, we’re looking at three key comfort factors that can work for you:

Range of tilt: Your monitor’s ability to tilt will add comfort by increasing the flexibility of its facing. Having a monitor that is tilted too high or too low could have the negative effect of subconsciously forcing your head to match, giving you headaches or unnecessary shoulder tension.

Ability to wall mount: Rigging up your monitor with a reliable wall mount or desk stand will provide you the advantages of increased desk space and heightened maneuverability of your monitor. Look for VESA-compatible monitors, with 100 x 100 mounting surfaces giving you the most options in terms of wall mounts to buy and 200 x 200 being an okay alternative for ultrawide monitors.

Eye comfort: Screens that are too bright, glossy, or that suffer from screen flickering can all cause discomfort to the eyes. Nowadays, monitors are also providing built-in blue light blocking to Strengthen users’ sleep quality. All of these factors can greatly affect how you perceive your time with your monitor and the quality of your work, so much so that we’d recommend you check out our monitors for eye strain if this is a recurring problem for you.

The best monitors for programming: Reviews & Recommendations

The best monitors for programming include a wide range of brands, makes, and features. Again, a good monitor for programming will be good for a wide variety of uses. Any of the monitors on this list will be good for any purpose, but also happen to have some qualities that provide them the edge over the competition when it comes to quality coding time.

Best overall: LG 34WN80C-B UltraWide Monitor

Why it made the cut: This monitor is ultrawide, the perfect size, and has on-screen controls to make it the best possible experience for people wanting to use multiple windows at once.

Specs

  • Size: 34”
  • Resolution: 3440 x 1440 pixels
  • Screen: Anti-glare, Hard coating

Pros

  • Built-in screen-splitting options
  • USB-C works great with the MacBook Pro
  • Excellent height adjustability for neck comfort
  • 100 x 100 VESA wall-mountable

Cons

The LG 34WN80C-B Ultrawide is designed for intensive programming at home. This is seen in its On-Screen tech, maneuverability, and MacBook Pro connectability. It also happens to be one of the best ultrawide monitors for working at home.

The first way this can be seen is through the huge customization ability available through LG’s On-Screen control options. Using this feature you can subdivide your screen into defined boxes. Click, drag, and pop your relevant windows into place to fill each section and get the most out of the monitor. You’ll notice that you have space for debugging windows, coding screens, GitHub pages, and more all on one monitor without feeling cramped. Naturally, the 34-inch ultrawide size of this LG plays into that, but the on-screen controls will certainly pull their weight.

Next, let’s talk about maneuverability. This monitor does a great job of accommodating coders of any height by having just over half a foot of vertical height adjustment. Furthermore, this is accomplished without finicky knobs or difficult-to-reach panels, you can just move it with your hands and the spring-loaded mechanism of the stand will take care of the rest.

Finally, consider that this monitor supports USB-C, making it a really good combo with MacBook Pro laptops. Considering that macOS is a preferred programming environment, there’s a good chance that either your current or next company computer will be one. There are other good monitor options for MacBook Pro users but not all of them will prove to be best for programmers.

Best 4K: HP 27-inch 4K UHD

Why it made the cut: This is a 4K monitor for programming with built-in blue light filtering, excellent tilting, and the ultra high resolution you deserve.

Specs

  • Size: 27”
  • Resolution: 3840 x 2160 pixels
  • Tilt: 5 degrees forward, 16 degrees backward

Pros

  • AMD FreeSync for low blur
  • Ultra-thin bezel
  • Built-in blue light protection
  • Great backward tilt range

Cons

  • Not VESA compatible for mounting

The HP 27-inch 4K UHD provides a decent size while giving you the 4K resolution you’ll need for intensive graphical projects and standard computer use. The added blue light protection that comes built-in with the monitor is a nice addition for making sure a couple of crunch time hours at night don’t cut into your success the next day.

Multi-monitor setups will particularly enjoy the sub-quarter-inch bezel around the sides of the monitor. Quickly flicking your eyes to your other monitor is comfortable and not immersion-breaking like it can be with some monitors. In fact, if you manage to bump your monitors close enough together, it can feel practically like one monitor from a vision perspective.

One thing I wasn’t so happy about with this monitor was the lack of VESA mount holes. Luckily, the monitor is still quite adjustable with six degrees downward tilt and 17 degrees upward, making this HP quite great for those of you that like to tower over your monitor as you work. Ultimately, we think you’ll likely not miss the ability to pair this with a monitor arm unless that just so happens to be a priority for you.

It all comes together to provide us an outstanding monitor for programming that fits in well with HP’s solid general-purpose monitors. While this HP fits in as the best 4K monitor for programming, you should certainly check out the others if you are an HP fan.

Best value: Samsung Business S27R650FDN

Why it made the cut: This monitor approaches budget pricing while still having great features for professionals.

Specs

  • Size: 27”
  • Resolution: 1920 x 1080 pixels
  • Viewing angle: 172 degrees

Pros

  • Includes Eye Saver Mode
  • Wide viewing angle for collaboration
  • Full connectivity panel
  • Energy-saving mode

Cons

  • Unreliable DisplayPort connection

The Samsung Business S27R650FDN has “business” right in the name but does it hold up to being the best value monitor for programming work? Based on the features and specs that Samsung has managed to pour into it, we’d respond with a resounding “yes.” That’s without mentioning one of the most businesslike features of all, its economical energy-saving mode and bargain sticker price.

With workers in mind, the Samsung Business uses the included Eye Saver Mode to reduce blue light from the monitor. Flicker-Free technology is also included to keep your eyes comfortable and feeling rested through a long shift.

Especially useful for teams and collaborative efforts, the Samsung Business has a 172-degree viewing angle and a wide connectivity panel to support a wide range of devices, including those that use USB 3.0 (including B type), USB 2.0, DisplayPort, HDMI, and old school RGB. For those with a ton of devices, this will certainly be the best value monitor for programming. The only caveat to this is that the DisplayPort is touchy and unreliable, dropping for some users.

Best for gaming and programming: Samsung Odyssey G9

Why it made the cut: The Samsung Odyssey G9 is the best monitor for gaming and programming due to its size, resolution, and high-performance gaming screen.

Specs

  • Size: 49”
  • Resolution: 5120 x 1440 pixels
  • Refresh rate: 240Hz

Pros

  • Gigantic screen size
  • Vivid color display
  • Intensive curve

Cons

Here’s another fantastic ultrawide option for your gaming and programming pleasure. Much like our pick for the overall best monitor for programming, the Samsung Odyssey G9 provides a massive screen ready to fit many windows, charts, graphs, debug menus, and the like.

What’s different about the G9 is that it is also one of the best ultrawide gaming monitors, with insanely high refresh rates of 240Hz and a 1 millisecond response time. Add on top of this the AMD FreeSync technology that ensures that your monitor matches a compatible graphics card frame-by-frame and you have a recipe for back-to-back after-work headshots.

Additionally, the G9 has a curve at a degree that copies the curve of the human eye. This helps reduce the need to constantly bend your neck to take in the fullness of the screen. That doesn’t mean that you’ll never wish to crane your neck or tilt your head while using a G9, of course, but you should notice a subtle reduction in neck and shoulder stress when compared to other curved monitors for programming.

One thing to keep in mind is that the G9 is bigger than nearly any other monitor out there, which makes it a great choice of large monitor for programming. Unfortunately, the sticker price has had the chance to measure every square inch of the G9 and has been able to keep up with it. While this is certainly not a cheap monitor for programming, it will keep you happy.

Best portable: SideTrak Swivel 14”

Why it made the cut: This portable monitor naturally attaches to your laptop to provide you the dual-monitor office feel on the go.

Specs

  • Size: 14”
  • Resolution: 1920 x 1080 pixels
  • Weight: 1.5 pounds (3.1 with attachments)

Pros

  • Connects to any laptop
  • No tool installation
  • Plug and play, download-free installation

Cons

  • Designed for right-side attachment only

As working on the go has become more and more popular, especially in the programming field, the desire to have a second monitor to travel with us has grown immensely. This can be seen with the expansive list of fantastic portable monitors coming out over the past few years. So, what makes the SideTrak Swivel the best portable monitor for programming?

While maintaining the high quality of the other portable monitors, the SideTrak Swivel has superior attachment and connectability options. With a combo of sticky pads and computer-safe magnets, the monitor attaches directly next to the side of your laptop’s screen. Unlike other portable monitors that are stuck resting in a stand, you can tilt it to the angle you’re used to in the office. Really, that’s what it all comes down to, recreating the dual-monitor office setup that you like anywhere you go.

Furthermore, the SideTrak Swivel has a ton of connectivity options. You can have USB-C, with DisplayPort capabilities, for your MacBook Pro or use standard USB-A or HDMI for other notebook computers. It’s even compatible with Chromebook and can connect to just about any device while remaining plug-and-play.

The only disappointing thing about the SideTrak experience is the fact that it could just as easily be called the RightSideTrak. The attachment mechanism is designed to be attached to the left part of the monitor. If, like me, you’re used to having your second monitor on the left, you can do so, but you’ll be stuck with an unsightly upside-down monitor as a result.

Best budget: BenQ GW2780

Why it made the cut: This monitor checks all of the basic boxes, gives you a bit extra, and still has a price tag worthy of the best budget monitor for programming. 

Specs

  • Size: 27”
  • Resolution: 1920 x 1080 pixels
  • Screen: Glossy LED

Pros

  • Intelligent brightness adjustment
  • Wall mountable with 100 x 100 VESA
  • Built-in cable management

Cons

  • Low-quality built-in speakers

Our best budget monitor for programming, the BenQ GW2780, stays cheap but has a lot of nifty features that make it worth your while for programming or any other purpose. 

You can see the standard features that make it great for programming with the 27-inch screen or the fact that it has 100 x 100 VESA mount capabilities.

However, it is the extra features that aren’t costing you any extra that make the BenQ outcompete other budget monitor contenders. One cool example is a sensor that adjusts your screen’s brightness for you automatically. Another is the built-in cord control in the stand. Sure, these aren’t features most of you are begging for, but it’s these kinds of thoughtful touches that show BenQ is going the extra mile to make a worthwhile product for the budget tier.

One extra you probably won’t love, however, is the included speakers. They’re low-quality and quiet, and even people who aren’t professed audiophiles tend to struggle to like them. If you are in need of some speakers on the cheap, there are quite a few desktop speakers or budget Bluetooth speakers out there that will better suit your needs.

FAQs

Q: How much does a monitor for programming cost?

A computer monitor for programming will probably cost around $300 to $600, though that can change depending on the category. For example, the best value monitor for programming might come in under $250, while the best monitor for gaming and programming might go over $1,000.

Q: What is a good monitor size for programming?

The best monitors for programming should typically be at least 24 inches but the bigger the better. Exceptions obviously exist, such as when you are getting a portable monitor, but the “big equals better” rule will apply for most coders.

Q: How many monitors are good for programming?

Two or three monitors are best for programming. In the modern age, single monitor setups feel limiting for any use but can feel especially straining when you are dealing with multiple windows simultaneously. While our pick for the best monitor for programming, the LG 34WN80C-B UltraWide, has on-screen tech to make this easier with a single monitor, the vast majority of monitors do not. At the same time, there can be too much of a good thing—don’t let your desk space get conquered by too many monitors.

Final thoughts on the best monitors for programming

Getting one of the best monitors for programming doesn’t have to be difficult. If you find a monitor that is easy to use in daily life, treats your eyes well, and connects properly with your work computer, then you’ve probably found a decent programming monitor. Still, considering a unique monitor like the LG 34WN80C-B UltraWide or the business-minded Samsung Business S27R650FDN might provide you the extra edge you’ve been looking for.

Wed, 29 Jun 2022 23:15:00 -0500 John Alexander en-US text/html https://www.popsci.com/gear/best-monitors-for-programming/
Killexams : Virtual Client Computing Software Market to Witness Huge Growth by 2022-2028 | Unidesk, VMware, Citrix Systems, Ericom Software

Advance Market Analytics published a new research publication on “Virtual Client Computing Software Market Insights, to 2027” with 232 pages and enriched with self-explained Tables and charts in presentable format. In the Study you will find new evolving Trends, Drivers, Restraints, Opportunities generated by targeting market associated stakeholders. The growth of the Virtual Client Computing Software market was mainly driven by the increasing R&D spending across the world.

Get Free Exclusive PDF sample Copy of This Research @ https://www.advancemarketanalytics.com/sample-report/104041-global-virtual-client-computing-software-market#utm_source=DigitalJournalLal

Some of the key players profiled in the study are: VMware Inc. (United States), Citrix Systems, Inc. (United States), Microsoft Corporation (United States), Ericom Software (United States), Unidesk Corporation (United States), Dell (United States), Fujitsu (Japan), HP (United States), Hitachi, Ltd. (Japan), NEC Corporation (Japan).

Scope of the Report of Virtual Client Computing Software
Virtual client computing is defined as a computing model that provides a desktop virtualization solution to Strengthen limitations associated with the traditional distributed desktop environment. A client-based virtual machine is centrally managed on a server and then executed on a client device. Though the operating system is updated as well as backed up with the help of a server, a continuous network connection is not needed for the functioning of a client-based virtual machine. This growth is primarily driven by The growing demands for a more nimble workforce as well as lower costs and High adoption due to satisfaction in simplified IT management and enhanced information security.

The titled segments and sub-section of the market are illuminated below:

by Type (Virtual User Sessions (VUS), Terminal Services, Virtual Desktop Infrastructure), Deployment Mode (Cloud, On Premise), Organization Size (SME’s, Large Enterprise), End User (Public Utilities, Business, Industry, Others)

Market Trends:
The rising needs for improved user productivity
High Adoption of  Workspace as a Service (WaaS)

Opportunities:
Technological advancement associated with Virtual Client Computing Software
The growing demand for cloud-based solutions

Market Drivers:
High adoption due to satisfaction in simplified IT management and enhanced information security.
The growing demands for a more nimble workforce as well as lower costs

Region Included are: North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Oceania, South America, Middle East & Africa

Country Level Break-Up: United States, Canada, Mexico, Brazil, Argentina, Colombia, Chile, South Africa, Nigeria, Tunisia, Morocco, Germany, United Kingdom (UK), the Netherlands, Spain, Italy, Belgium, Austria, Turkey, Russia, France, Poland, Israel, United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, China, Japan, Taiwan, South Korea, Singapore, India, Australia and New Zealand etc.

Have Any Questions Regarding Global Virtual Client Computing Software Market Report, Ask Our [email protected] https://www.advancemarketanalytics.com/enquiry-before-buy/104041-global-virtual-client-computing-software-market#utm_source=DigitalJournalLal

Strategic Points Covered in Table of Content of Global Virtual Client Computing Software Market:

Chapter 1: Introduction, market driving force product Objective of Study and Research Scope the Virtual Client Computing Software market

Chapter 2: Exclusive Summary – the basic information of the Virtual Client Computing Software Market.

Chapter 3: Displaying the Market Dynamics- Drivers, Trends and Challenges & Opportunities of the Virtual Client Computing Software

Chapter 4: Presenting the Virtual Client Computing Software Market Factor Analysis, Porters Five Forces, Supply/Value Chain, PESTEL analysis, Market Entropy, Patent/Trademark Analysis.

Chapter 5: Displaying the by Type, End User and Region/Country 2015-2020

Chapter 6: Evaluating the leading manufacturers of the Virtual Client Computing Software market which consists of its Competitive Landscape, Peer Group Analysis, BCG Matrix & Company Profile

Chapter 7: To evaluate the market by segments, by countries and by Manufacturers/Company with revenue share and sales by key countries in these various regions (2021-2027)

Chapter 8 & 9: Displaying the Appendix, Methodology and Data Source

finally, Virtual Client Computing Software Market is a valuable source of guidance for individuals and companies.

Read Detailed Index of full Research Study at @ https://www.advancemarketanalytics.com/reports/104041-global-virtual-client-computing-software-market#utm_source=DigitalJournalLal

Thanks for studying this article; you can also get individual chapter wise section or region wise report version like North America, Middle East, Africa, Europe or LATAM, Southeast Asia.

Contact Us:

Craig Francis (PR & Marketing Manager)
AMA Research & Media LLP
Unit No. 429, Parsonage Road Edison, NJ
New Jersey USA – 08837
Phone: +1 (206) 317 1218

Tue, 28 Jun 2022 19:44:00 -0500 Newsmantraa en-US text/html https://www.digitaljournal.com/pr/virtual-client-computing-software-market-to-witness-huge-growth-by-2022-2028-unidesk-vmware-citrix-systems-ericom-software
Killexams : Dell Certification Guide: Overview and Career Paths

In the 1980s, a 19-year-old pre-med student at the University of Texas just happened to like computers – a lot. Michael Dell never made it to graduation and dropped out at the end of his first year to pursue a different dream, armed only with a $1,000 stake from his family and a love of PCs. No one could have predicted that Dell would turn his dorm room “business” into Dell Inc., a globally recognized leader in computing.

Dell merged with EMC Corporation in late 2016, and the new company was rebranded as Dell Technologies, which includes Dell, Dell EMC, Pivotal, RSA, Secureworks, Virtustream and VMware. According to Forbes, Dell Technologies (before completion of the merger with EMC) was the fourth largest privately held company in the United States and the world’s largest privately held technology company. With offices in more than 180 countries worldwide, Dell boasts more than 145,000 employees, with sales exceeding $74 billion in 2016. According to its investor relations website, a whopping 98% of all Fortune 500 companies use Dell Technologies products and services. Dell is also well represented in Gartner Magic Quadrant leader lists for products and services, including the Data Center Backup and Recovery Software, Managed Security Services, and Integrated Systems lists.

Computing products remain a staple in the Dell product portfolio. Consumers interested in laptops, workstations, tablets and desktops will find a variety of products available (along with peripherals such as monitors, printers and VDI appliances) to meet personal, SMB, enterprise or gaming requirements. Dell also offers solutions for networks, storage, servers, gateways and embedded computing, as well as a broad range of IT and business services.

Dell Technologies’ products and services currently fall under seven technology brands:

Within each brand, there are multiple products, services and solutions that cater to specific areas of interest for Dell customers.

VMware, Secureworks and Pivotal continue to strategically align with Dell Technologies’ core business areas. VMware continues to provide hybrid cloud, mobile computing and software-defined data center solutions. Pivotal offers analytic tools, next-generation software development methodology and modern cloud-native platforms, while Secureworks focuses on incident response and threat intelligence security. RSA helps companies manage and monitor their digital risk profiles and activities.

Dell certification program overview

In response to its merger with EMC, Dell and Dell EMC’s certification programs have merged into the unified Dell EMC Proven Professional certification portfolio. You’ll find that the website and certifications have a brand-new look and feel. Dell Education Services offers two CompTIA certs along with numerous Dell EMC certifications divided up by technology category or track, including Storage, Data Protection, Converged Infrastructure and Data Science. A exact search of the Dell certification website finds that Dell no longer offers Microsoft certification training courses.

If you’re not sure where to start on your certification journey, the new Dell EMC Proven Professional certification framework is a great starting point. Here, you’ll find certifications for four skill levels:

  • Dell EMC Certified Associate (DECA): Entry-level or foundational knowledge
  • Dell EMC Certified Specialist (DECS): Technology and role-specific skills
  • Dell EMC Certified Expert (DECE): Advanced experience and skills in multiple technologies
  • Dell EMC Certified Master (DECM): Subject matter expertise in complex scenarios and multiple technologies

The certification framework is hierarchical: The specialist certification takes the lower-level associate credential as a prerequisite, while the expert-level credentials take both the associate and specialist credentials as prerequisites. Associate and specialist certifications do not expire. Master and expert certifications expire after two years.

In Dell’s certification framework, you’ll find Dell EMC credentials across eight different tracks: Technology Architect (TA), Cloud Architect (CA), Enterprise Architect (EA), Implementation Engineer (IE), Systems Administrator (SA), Platform Engineer (PE), Technical Support Engineer (TSE) and Data Scientist (DS). The certification framework also maps credentials back to specific technology areas (cloud, storage, data protection, server, networking, converged infrastructure and data science).

There are also certification maps for role-based credentials:

  • Plan and Design Roadmap: This offers four credentials at the associate level, seven at the specialist level, three expert exams and a single master-level (architect) exam.
  • Deploy Roadmap: This certification path offers four associate-level credentials, 13 specialist exams and four expert exams. Currently, there are no exams at the master level. The roadmap also mentions CompTIA Server+, two product and technology exams, associate and professional exams in server and networking, VxRail Appliance, and PowerEdge.
  • Manage Roadmap: This path offers a single master exam, five expert exams, 15 specialist exams and four associate exams. It also includes CompTIA Server+, VMware VCP credentials, two product technology exams, and associate and professional exams in server and networking.
  • Support Roadmap: The Support Roadmap includes one associate exam, seven specialist exams and one expert exam. It mentions CompTIA Server+ along with associate and professional networking and PowerEdge exams.

Certification candidates should register with Dell EMC TechDirect. From the TechDirect portal, candidates can access free test prep materials, schedule exams, view test results and print their certification transcripts. Candidates may also view their company’s competency status through the TechDirect portal.

Dell Partners whose employees have earned the Certified Deployment Professional badge may be eligible to earn the Services Competency for Deployment (or simply Deployment Competency) designation. To earn this competency, Partners must be at least at the Gold tier level and have two or more employees who’ve passed the associated exam. A formal application must be submitted to Dell requesting Deployment Competency designation. Deployment Competency designations are available for Server, Storage, Networking and Client Systems.

Dell EMC certifications

Because Dell has updated its certification portfolio, it’s well worth your time to peruse the new Dell EMC Proven Professional Certification Framework to understand the new certification flow. All certification tracks begin with selecting a technology concentration: Cloud, Storage, Data Protection, Server, Networking, Converged Infrastructure or Data Science. Next, candidates earn the DECA (associate) credential recommended for their technology track. From there, candidates select the applicable role-based certification roadmap (Plan and Design, Deploy, Manage, or Support) and follow the certification recommendations to earn the specialist, expert and master credentials available in that certification path.

Below, we’ve listed some examples of the many certifications you’ll find in the new Dell EMC program. We’ve chosen to present these certification examples by the available technology tracks.

Server

The Server technology roadmap is the only certification path where a third-party certification, the CompTIA Server+, serves as the associate-level credential.

  • Implementation Engineer, PowerEdge Specialist (DECS-IE): Certification is focused on IT professionals working with Dell EMC PowerEdge Server technology and products. To earn the credential, candidates must first obtain either the CompTIA Server+ or the Dell Certified Associate PowerEdge credential and pass the specialist exam. The test targets PowerEdge rack and tower servers, installation, configuration (server storage, iDRAC and Lifecycle Controller), and maintenance and troubleshooting.

Storage

  • Information Storage and Management Associate (DCA-ISM): This credential validates a candidate’s knowledge of data center infrastructure, storage systems (file-based, object-based, software-defined, block-based and intelligent), security, replication management, backup, archive, replication, and storage networking technologies (Fibre Channel SAN, Internet Protocol SAN and Fibre Channel over Ethernet SAN).
  • Implementation Engineer, SC Series Specialist (DCS-IE): This certification targets professionals working with Dell EMC SC Series storage products. Skills covered include Dell Storage Manager installation and configuration, SC Series hardware and cabling (including Fibre Channel and iSCSI), SC Series configuration, administration (Storage Manager and SC Series), and SAN HBA and switch configuration. To earn the certification, candidates must possess the Associate Information Storage and Management Version 1.0, 2.0, or 3.0 credential and pass the specialist exam.
  • Expert – SC Series (DCE): To obtain this expert-level certification, candidates must possess the Specialist Implementation Engineer, SC Series certification and pass the expert exam. The test focuses on SC Series Storage product-related technologies, including hardware installation, storage array initialization, array configuration, failover testing, host confirmation and front-end storage networking configuration.

Networking

  • Certified Associate – Networking: This credential targets professionals working with Dell EMC networking switches. Candidates should have at least one year of networking experience, with six months focused on installing and managing EMC networking switches, and be able to install, configure, and troubleshoot networking switches.
  • Certified Professional – Networking: This credential targets experienced Dell hardware professionals. Candidates should have one to three years of experience, plus at least one year of direct experience managing or deploying Dell hardware solutions. Successful candidates will also understand deployment, cutover and integration planning, Dell tools for deployment, network configuration, and troubleshooting.

Cloud and Infrastructure Services (Cloud Architect)

  • Cloud Infrastructure and Services Associate (DCA-CIS): This cert focuses on using cloud computing reference architectures to build cloud infrastructures, cloud technologies and processes, digital transformations, cloud services and applications, cloud security, business continuity, and cloud service management.
  • Cloud Infrastructure Specialist (DCS-CA): This credential is the specialist level of the Dell EMC Cloud Architect certification. Candidates must possess either the associate level of the Information Storage Management (version 2.0 or 3.0) or the Cloud Infrastructure and Services (version 1.0, 2.0 or 3.0) credential and pass the specialist exam. The test focuses on cloud-related topics, including design, management, available resources (such as network, storage and computing), monitoring, hybrid cloud and disaster recovery.
  • Cloud Architect, Cloud Services Expert (DCE-CA): This certification is the expert level of the Dell EMC Cloud Architect certification. As with the DCS-CA, candidates need to possess either the associate-level Information Storage and Management (version 2.0 or 3.0) or the Cloud Infrastructure and Services (version 1.0 or 2.0) credential plus the DCS-CA and pass the expert exam. The credential validates a candidate’s skill in planning and designing cloud infrastructures, business transformation, ITaaS environments, cloud services, security, governance, and financial and organizational planning.

Data Protection

  • Data Protection and Management – Associate (DCA-DPM): This credential validates a candidate’s understanding of the data protection technologies, components and processes.
  • Converged InfrastructureConverged Infrastructure targets professionals who maintain, back up, configure, upgrade, troubleshoot, monitor and administer VxBlock Systems. Two credentials are available:
    • Converged Systems and Hybrid Cloud Version 1.0 – Associate (DCA-CSHC): This is a foundation-level certification that focuses on a candidate’s understanding of how to effect transformation using Dell EMC Converged Systems and Digital and IT Transformation.
    • Systems Administrator, Converged Infrastructure Version 2.0 – Specialist (DCS-SA): This credential validates a candidate’s knowledge of VxBlock Systems concepts, administration, security, resource management, maintenance and troubleshooting.

Data Science

  • Data Science Associate (DECA-DS): A foundation-level credential for those just entering the realm of data science and big data analytics, this certification focuses on the tools and techniques commonly used in data analytics.
  • Advanced Analytics Specialist (DECS-DS): This certification focuses on using advanced analytic methods to identify and recommend solutions for business problems. Methods include visualization, Hadoop (including Hive, HBase and Pig), natural language processing and social network analysis.

Dell third-party certifications

On top of its Certified Deployment Professional certifications, Dell Education Services has partnered with several third-party organizations in the past to provide certifications for CompTIA and Microsoft certifications. However, Dell has reduced the number of CompTIA cert courses that it offers and totally eliminated its Microsoft cert courses.

CompTIA certifications

CompTIA is a well-known, vendor-neutral certification provider. Dell has reduced its CompTIA certification training courses to just two online offerings: A+ and Linux+ certs. The cost for CompTIA training courses ranges from $550 to $650 for these topics.

According to Dell, 78% of all companies use IT deployment services. With such a widespread need, IT professionals specializing in deployment find a demand for their skills across multiple industry sectors. Some of the sectors that Dell serves are education, energy, financial services, government (federal, state and local), healthcare, manufacturing, retail, telecommunications, media and entertainment, and web development.

Popular job boards such as TechCareers, SimplyHired and Glassdoor reveal numerous jobs available for Dell-certified deployment professionals. Most of the listed positions focus on engineering roles for server, virtualization, networking, systems, integration, data security and the like. Other available roles include consultants, account executives, system administrators, IT managers and deployment managers.

Dell recommends and offers core training courses for each of its Dell EMC credentials. Interested candidates who register on the DirectTech website can also access free test study guides. In addition, Dell offers many free e-learning courses at the foundation level on various Dell products and technologies, including networking, storage, data protection, big data and converged infrastructure.

Core recommended training for each solution track includes a basic, intermediate and advanced course. Prices vary, but candidates can expect to pay $2,500 to $5,000. Most training is a combination of e-learning activities that you complete prior to attending instructor-led training.

Dell also provides training for other certifications and training opportunities for end users and IT professionals in various disciplines, including these:

Fundamental or introductory courses typically cost $100 to $200, while advanced training courses may cost thousands of dollars (we found one course with a price tag of $10,000). Dell also offers onsite training courses, with most prices running at least double that of public courses. The most expensive onsite course we found topped $42,000.

Check out everything Dell has to offer on its Education Services webpage. 


Ed Tittel

Ed is a 30-year-plus veteran of the computing industry who has worked as a programmer, a technical manager, a classroom instructor, a network consultant, and a technical evangelist for companies that include Burroughs, Schlumberger, Novell, IBM/Tivoli and NetQoS. He has written for numerous publications, including Tom’s IT Pro, and is the author of more than 140 computing books on information security, web markup languages and development tools, and Windows operating systems.


Earl Follis

Earl is also a 30-year veteran of the computer industry who has worked in IT training, marketing, technical evangelism, and market analysis in the areas of networking and systems technology and management. Ed and Earl met in the late 1980s when Ed hired Earl as a trainer at an Austin-area networking company that’s now part of HP. The two of them have written numerous books together on NetWare, Windows Server and other topics. Earl is also a regular writer for the computer trade press, with many e-books, whitepapers and articles to his credit.

Tue, 28 Jun 2022 12:00:00 -0500 en text/html https://www.businessnewsdaily.com/10942-dell-certification-guide.html
Killexams : SDN and NFV Market Growth Insight : Industry Trends, Size, Share, Competitive Analysis, Statistics, Regional, And Global Industry Forecast to 2028

Global SDN and NFV Market report presents a detailed Valuation of the business to estimate the market size, share, value, volume, revenue, key drivers, restrictions, significant insights into the planned development of the worldwide SDN and NFV market.

Global SDN and NFV Market research report provides an detailed analysis of market size, share, growth, trends and forecast. The SDN and NFV Market including detailed description of market sizing and growth, value, the key opportunities in the SDN and NFV Market and outlines the factors that are and will be driving the growth of the industry taking into consideration the previous growth patterns with forecast period 2022-2028. The SDN and NFV Market research report provides insight into main drivers, challenges, opportunities and risk of the market. Key players are profiled as well with their market shares in the global SDN and NFV Market discussed. Overall, this report covers the historical situation, present status and the future prospects. The SDN and NFV Market research report encompasses research methodologies, and porter’s five forces analysis, product scope, CAGR status. Finally, the report offers a quantitative analysis of key countries according to their revenue share and latest technologies advancements in each region.

Get a sample PDF of report – https://www.marketreportsworld.com/enquiry/request-sample/21065166

About SDN and NFV Market:

Market Analysis and Insights: Global SDN and NFV Market

Virtualization is enabling networking to design, implement, and manage network services far more efficiently than all premise bases. Among virtualization, SND and NFV are the two key technologies enabling the transition.

The global SDN and NFV market size is projected to reach USD 96510 million by 2028, from USD 32940 million in 2021, at a CAGR of 16.4% during 2022-2028.

Two technology trends that are transforming network management, particularly those that are widely-distributed and employ public, private or hybrid cloud services, are software-defined networks (SDN) and network functions virtualization (NFV).

North America, Europe, APAC are the representative regions, and the local vendors play important roles. NFV is expected to be more than SDN market, and has higher growth rate in the following years. The application field is mainly in Telecom and IT, BFSI, Government and Public Utilities currently. In addition, wider application scenario such as medical, energy and education will rise in the future.

SDN and NFV industry concentration is relatively high. Top players such as Cisco, Ericsson, Huawei, Nokia, Intel, HP have market share more than 20% in total. United States has many vendors. The market entrance barrier is high.

With industry-standard accuracy in analysis and high data integrity, the report makes a brilliant attempt to unveil key opportunities available in the global SDN and NFV market to help players in achieving a strong market position. Buyers of the report can access Verified and reliable market forecasts, including those for the overall size of the global SDN and NFV market in terms of revenue.

Overall, the report proves to be an effective tool that players can use to gain a competitive edge over their competitors and ensure lasting success in the global SDN and NFV market. All of the findings, data, and information provided in the report are validated and revalidated with the help of trustworthy sources. The analysts who have authored the report took a unique and industry-best research and analysis approach for an in-depth study of the global SDN and NFV market.

Global SDN and NFV Scope and Market Size

Get a sample Copy of the SDN and NFV Market Report 2022

Here is List of BEST KEY PLAYERS Listed in SDN and NFV Market Report are:-

  • Cisco
  • Ericsson
  • Huawei
  • Nokia
  • Intel
  • HP
  • IBM
  • Juniper Networks
  • Broadcom
  • Dell
  • Oracle
  • NEC (Netcracker)
  • Ciena (Blue Planet)
  • Arista Networks
  • Amdocs
  • Comarch
  • ZTE
  • H3C

SDN and NFV Market Segmentation By Type:

SDN and NFV Market Segmentation By Application:

  • Telecom and IT
  • BFSI
  • Government and Public Utilities
  • Manufacturing
  • Others

Inquire more and share questions if any before the purchase on this report at –https://www.marketreportsworld.com/enquiry/pre-order-enquiry/21065166

The detailed information is based on current trends and historic milestones. This section also provides an analysis of the volume of production about the global market and about each type from 2017 to 2028. This section mentions the volume of production by region from 2017 to 2028. Pricing analysis is included in the report according to each type from the year 2017 to 2028, manufacturer from 2017 to 2022, region from 2017 to 2022, and global price from 2017 to 2028.

Geographically, this report is segmented into several key regions, with sales, revenue, market share and growth Rate of SDN and NFV in these regions, from 2015 to 2028, covering

  • North America (United States, Canada and Mexico)
  • Europe (Germany, UK, France, Italy, Russia and Turkey etc.)
  • Asia-Pacific (China, Japan, Korea, India, Australia, Indonesia, Thailand, Philippines, Malaysia and Vietnam)
  • South America (Brazil, Argentina, Columbia etc.)
  • Middle East and Africa (Saudi Arabia, UAE, Egypt, Nigeria and South Africa)

SDN and NFV Market Forecast by regions, type and application, with sales and revenue, from 2022 to 2028. SDN and NFV Market Share, distributors, major suppliers, changing price patterns and the supply chain of raw materials is highlighted in the report. SDN and NFV Market Size (sales, revenue) forecast by regions and countries from 2022 to 2028 of SDN and NFV industry.The global SDN and NFV market Growth is anticipated to rise at a considerable rate during the forecast period, between 2022 and 2028. In 2022, the market was growing at a steady rate and with the rising adoption of strategies by key players, the market is expected to rise over the projected horizon.

SDN and NFV Market Trend for Development and marketing channels are analysed. Finally, the feasibility of new investment projects is assessed and overall research conclusions offered. SDN and NFV Market Report also mentions market share accrued by each product in the SDN and NFV market, along with the production growth.

Study Objectives of this report are:

  • To study and analyze the global SDN and NFV market size (value and volume) by company, key regions/countries, products and application, history data from 2017 to 2020, and forecast to 2028.
  • To understand the structure of SDN and NFV market by identifying its various subsegments.
  • To share detailed information about the key factors influencing the growth of the market (growth potential, opportunities, drivers, industry-specific challenges and risks).
  • Focuses on the key global SDN and NFV manufacturers, to define, describe and analyze the sales volume, value, market share, market competition landscape, SWOT analysis and development plans in next few years.
  • To analyze the SDN and NFV with respect to individual growth trends, future prospects, and their contribution to the total market.
  • To project the value and volume of SDN and NFV submarkets, with respect to key regions (along with their respective key countries).
  • To analyze competitive developments such as expansions, agreements, new product launches, and acquisitions in the market.
  • To strategically profile the key players and comprehensively analyze their growth strategies.

Key Stakeholders

  • Raw material suppliers
  • Distributors/traders/wholesalers/suppliers
  • Regulatory bodies, including government agencies and NGO
  • Commercial research and development (RandD) institutions
  • Importers and exporters
  • Government organizations, research organizations, and consulting firms
  • Trade associations and industry bodies
  • End-use industries

This SDN and NFV Market Research/Analysis Report Contains Answers to your following Questions

  • Which Manufacturing Technology is used for SDN and NFV? What Developments Are Going On in That Technology? Which Trends Are Causing These Developments?
  • Who Are the Global Key Players in This SDN and NFV Market? What are Their Company Profile, Their Product Information, and Contact Information?
  • What Was Global Market Status of SDN and NFV Market? What Was Capacity, Production Value, Cost and PROFIT of SDN and NFV Market?
  • What Is Current Market Status of SDN and NFV Industry? What’s Market Competition in This Industry, Both Company, and Country Wise? What’s Market Analysis of SDN and NFV Market by Taking Applications and Types in Consideration?
  • What Are Projections of Global SDN and NFV Industry Considering Capacity, Production and Production Value? What Will Be the Estimation of Cost and Profit? What Will Be Market Share, Supply and Consumption? What about Import and Export?
  • What Is SDN and NFV Market Chain Analysis by Upstream Raw Materials and Downstream Industry?
  • What Is Economic Impact On SDN and NFV Industry? What are Global Macroeconomic Environment Analysis Results? What Are Global Macroeconomic Environment Development Trends?
  • What Are Market Dynamics of SDN and NFV Market? What Are Challenges and Opportunities?
  • What Should Be Entry Strategies, Countermeasures to Economic Impact, and Marketing Channels for SDN and NFV Industry?

Purchase this report (Price 2900 USD for a single-user licence) https://www.marketreportsworld.com/purchase/21065166

Detailed TOC of Global SDN and NFV Market Report 2022

1 Report Overview
1.1 Study Scope
1.2 Market Analysis by Type
1.2.1 Global SDN and NFV Market Size Growth Rate by Type: 2017 VS 2021 VS 2028
1.2.2 SDN
1.2.3 NFV
1.3 Market by Application
1.3.1 Global SDN and NFV Market Share by Application: 2017 VS 2021 VS 2028
1.3.2 Telecom and IT
1.3.3 BFSI
1.3.4 Government and Public Utilities
1.3.5 Manufacturing
1.3.6 Others
1.4 Study Objectives
1.5 Years Considered

2 Global Growth Trends
2.1 Global SDN and NFV Market Perspective (2017-2028)
2.2 SDN and NFV Growth Trends by Region
2.2.1 SDN and NFV Market Size by Region: 2017 VS 2021 VS 2028
2.2.2 SDN and NFV Historic Market Size by Region (2017-2022)
2.2.3 SDN and NFV Forecasted Market Size by Region (2023-2028)
2.3 SDN and NFV Market Dynamics
2.3.1 SDN and NFV Industry Trends
2.3.2 SDN and NFV Market Drivers
2.3.3 SDN and NFV Market Challenges
2.3.4 SDN and NFV Market Restraints

3 Competition Landscape by Key Players
3.1 Global Top SDN and NFV Players by Revenue
3.1.1 Global Top SDN and NFV Players by Revenue (2017-2022)
3.1.2 Global SDN and NFV Revenue Market Share by Players (2017-2022)
3.2 Global SDN and NFV Market Share by Company Type (Tier 1, Tier 2, and Tier 3)
3.3 Players Covered: Ranking by SDN and NFV Revenue
3.4 Global SDN and NFV Market Concentration Ratio
3.4.1 Global SDN and NFV Market Concentration Ratio (CR5 and HHI)
3.4.2 Global Top 10 and Top 5 Companies by SDN and NFV Revenue in 2021
3.5 SDN and NFV Key Players Head office and Area Served
3.6 Key Players SDN and NFV Product Solution and Service
3.7 Date of Enter into SDN and NFV Market
3.8 Mergers and Acquisitions, Expansion Plans

4 SDN and NFV Breakdown Data by Type
4.1 Global SDN and NFV Historic Market Size by Type (2017-2022)
4.2 Global SDN and NFV Forecasted Market Size by Type (2023-2028)

5 SDN and NFV Breakdown Data by Application
5.1 Global SDN and NFV Historic Market Size by Application (2017-2022)
5.2 Global SDN and NFV Forecasted Market Size by Application (2023-2028)

6 North America
6.1 North America SDN and NFV Market Size (2017-2028)
6.2 North America SDN and NFV Market Size by Country (2017-2022)
6.3 North America SDN and NFV Market Size by Country (2023-2028)
6.4 United States
6.5 Canada

7 Europe
7.1 Europe SDN and NFV Market Size (2017-2028)
7.2 Europe SDN and NFV Market Size by Country (2017-2022)
7.3 Europe SDN and NFV Market Size by Country (2023-2028)
7.4 Germany
7.5 France
7.6 U.K.
7.7 Italy
7.8 Russia
7.9 Nordic Countries

8Asia-Pacific
8.1 Asia-Pacific SDN and NFV Market Size (2017-2028)
8.2 Asia-Pacific SDN and NFV Market Size by Country (2017-2022)
8.3 Asia-Pacific SDN and NFV Market Size by Country (2023-2028)
8.4 China
8.5 Japan
8.6 South Korea
8.7 Southeast Asia
8.8 India
8.9 Australia

Continued….

Browse complete table of contents at –https://www.marketreportsworld.com/TOC/21065166

About Us:

Market Reports World is the Credible Source for Gaining the Market Reports that will Provide you with the Lead Your Business Needs. Market is changing rapidly with the ongoing expansion of the industry. Advancement in the technology has provided today’s businesses with multifaceted advantages resulting in daily economic shifts. Thus, it is very important for a company to comprehend the patterns of the market movements in order to strategize better. An efficient strategy offers the companies with a head start in planning and an edge over the competitors.

Contact Us:

Market Reports World

Phone: US : +1 424 253 0946
UK : +44 203 239 8187

Email: [email protected]
Web: https://www.marketreportsworld.com

Other Reports Here:

Autonomous Intelligent Vehicle (AIV) Market: Global Industry Overview By Size,Growth, Share, Trends, Growth Factors, Historical Analysis, Opportunities and Industry Segments Poised for Rapid Growth by 2031

Compact Skid Steer Loaders Market Size,Share 2022 Global Industry Key Strategies, Historical Analysis, Segmentation, Application, Technology, Trends and Growth Opportunities, Forecasts to 2031

Absorbable Coronary Stent Market Size 2022 Global Comprehensive Research Study,Trends,Share, Development Status, Opportunities, Future Plans, Competitive Landscape and Growth by Forecast 2031

Copper Materials Market Size 2022 Share, Global Trends, Comprehensive Research Study, Development Status, Opportunities, Future Plans, Competitive Landscape and Growth by Forecast 2031

Long-cycling Solid-state Lithium Battery Market Share 2022: Global Key Findings, Industry Demand, Regional Analysis, Key Players Profiles, Future Prospects and Forecasts to 2031

Press Release Distributed by The Express Wire

To view the original version on The Express Wire visit SDN and NFV Market Growth Insight : Industry Trends, Size, Share, Competitive Analysis, Statistics, Regional, And Global Industry Forecast to 2028

Sun, 19 Jun 2022 21:26:00 -0500 TheExpressWire en-US text/html https://www.digitaljournal.com/pr/sdn-and-nfv-market-growth-insight-industry-trends-size-share-competitive-analysis-statistics-regional-and-global-industry-forecast-to-2028
Killexams : SDN and NFV Market Size is Increasing and Having a Big Impact on the Industry with PESTAL & SWOT Analysis till 2028 | No of Pages 116

The MarketWatch News Department was not involved in the creation of this content.

Jul 07, 2022 (The Expresswire) -- ""SDN and NFV Market"" Insights 2022 : SDN and NFV market size is projected to reach USD 96510 million by 2028, from USD 32940 million in 2021, at a CAGR of 16.4% during 2022-2028.. By Applications {Telecom and IT, BFSI, Government and Public Utilities, Manufacturing, Others}, By Types {SDN, NFV}, Regions and Forecast to 2028. The SDN and NFV Market Report Contains 116 pages Including Full TOC, Tables and Figures, and Chart with In-depth Analysis.

We have been tracking the direct impact of COVID-19 on this market, as well as the indirect impact from other industries. This report analyzes the impact of the pandemic on the SDN and NFV market from a Global and Regional perspective. The report outlines the market size, market characteristics, and market growth for SDN and NFV industry, categorized by type, application, and consumer sector. In addition, it provides a comprehensive analysis of aspects involved in market development before and after the Covid-19 pandemic. Report also conducted a PESTEL analysis in the industry to study key influencers and barriers to entry.

Final Report will add the analysis of the impact of COVID-19 on this industry.

TO KNOW HOW COVID-19 PANDEMIC AND RUSSIA UKRAINE WAR WILL IMPACT THIS MARKET - REQUEST SAMPLE

It also provides accurate information and cutting-edge analysis that is necessary to formulate an ideal business plan, and to define the right path for rapid growth for all involved industry players. With this information, stakeholders will be more capable of developing new strategies, which focus on market opportunities that will benefit them, making their business endeavours profitable in the process.

Get a sample PDF of report -https://www.marketgrowthreports.com/enquiry/request-sample/19866408

SDN and NFV Market - Competitive and Segmentation Analysis:

This SDN and NFV Market report offers detailed analysis supported by reliable statistics on sale and revenue by players for the period 2017-2022. The report also includes company description, major business, SDN and NFV product introduction, exact developments and SDN and NFV sales by region, type, application and by sales channel.

The major players covered in the SDN and NFV market report are:

● Cisco
● Ericsson
● Huawei
● Nokia
● Intel
● HP
● IBM
● Juniper Networks
● Broadcom
● Dell
● Oracle
● NEC (Netcracker)
● Ciena (Blue Planet)
● Arista Networks
● Amdocs
● Comarch
● ZTE
● H3C

Short Summery About SDN and NFV Market :

The Global SDN and NFV market is anticipated to rise at a considerable rate during the forecast period, between 2022 and 2028. In 2021, the market is growing at a steady rate and with the rising adoption of strategies by key players, the market is expected to rise over the projected horizon.

Virtualization is enabling networking to design, implement, and manage network services far more efficiently than all premise bases. Among virtualization, SND and NFV are the two key technologies enabling the transition.

Market Analysis and Insights: Global SDN and NFV Market

The global SDN and NFV market size is projected to reach USD 96510 million by 2028, from USD 32940 million in 2021, at a CAGR of 16.4% during 2022-2028.

Two technology trends that are transforming network management, particularly those that are widely-distributed and employ public, private or hybrid cloud services, are software-defined networks (SDN) and network functions virtualization (NFV).

North America, Europe, APAC are the representative regions, and the local vendors play important roles. NFV is expected to be more than SDN market, and has higher growth rate in the following years. The application field is mainly in Telecom and IT, BFSI, Government and Public Utilities currently. In addition, wider application scenario such as medical, energy and education will rise in the future.

SDN and NFV industry concentration is relatively high. Top players such as Cisco, Ericsson, Huawei, Nokia, Intel, HP have market share more than 20% in total. United States has many vendors. The market entrance barrier is high.

With industry-standard accuracy in analysis and high data integrity, the report makes a brilliant attempt to unveil key opportunities available in the global SDN and NFV market to help players in achieving a strong market position. Buyers of the report can access Verified and reliable market forecasts, including those for the overall size of the global SDN and NFV market in terms of revenue.

Overall, the report proves to be an effective tool that players can use to gain a competitive edge over their competitors and ensure lasting success in the global SDN and NFV market. All of the findings, data, and information provided in the report are validated and revalidated with the help of trustworthy sources. The analysts who have authored the report took a unique and industry-best research and analysis approach for an in-depth study of the global SDN and NFV market.

Global SDN and NFV Scope and Market Size

SDN and NFV market is segmented by players, region (country), by Type and by Application. Players, stakeholders, and other participants in the global SDN and NFV market will be able to gain the upper hand as they use the report as a powerful resource. The segmental analysis focuses on revenue and forecast by Type and by Application for the period 2017-2028.

Get a sample Copy of the SDN and NFV Market Report 2022

Report further studies the market development status and future SDN and NFV Market trend across the world. Also, it splits SDN and NFV market Segmentation by Type and by Applications to fully and deeply research and reveal market profile and prospects.

On the basis of product typethis report displays the production, revenue, price, market share and growth rate of each type, primarily split into:

● SDN
● NFV

On the basis of the end users/applicationsthis report focuses on the status and outlook for major applications/end users, consumption (sales), market share and growth rate for each application, including:

● Telecom and IT
● BFSI
● Government and Public Utilities
● Manufacturing
● Others

SDN and NFV Market - Regional Analysis:

Geographically, this report is segmented into several key regions, with sales, revenue, market share and growth Rate of SDN and NFV in these regions, from 2015 to 2027, covering

● North America (United States, Canada and Mexico) ● Europe (Germany, UK, France, Italy, Russia and Turkey etc.) ● Asia-Pacific (China, Japan, Korea, India, Australia, Indonesia, Thailand, Philippines, Malaysia and Vietnam) ● South America (Brazil, Argentina, Columbia etc.) ● Middle East and Africa (Saudi Arabia, UAE, Egypt, Nigeria and South Africa)

Some of the key questions answered in this report:

● What is the global (North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, South America, Middle East and Africa) sales value, production value, consumption value, import and export of SDN and NFV? ● Who are the global key manufacturers of the SDN and NFV Industry? How is their operating situation (capacity, production, sales, price, cost, gross, and revenue)? ● What are the SDN and NFV market opportunities and threats faced by the vendors in the global SDN and NFV Industry? ● Which application/end-user or product type may seek incremental growth prospects? What is the market share of each type and application? ● What focused approach and constraints are holding the SDN and NFV market? ● What are the different sales, marketing, and distribution channels in the global industry? ● What are the upstream raw materials and manufacturing equipment of SDN and NFV along with the manufacturing process of SDN and NFV? ● What are the key market trends impacting the growth of the SDN and NFV market? ● Economic impact on the SDN and NFV industry and development trend of the SDN and NFV industry. ● What are the market opportunities, market risk, and market overview of the SDN and NFV market? ● What are the key drivers, restraints, opportunities, and challenges of the SDN and NFV market, and how they are expected to impact the market? ● What is the SDN and NFV market size at the regional and country-level?

Our research analysts will help you to get customized details for your report, which can be modified in terms of a specific region, application or any statistical details. In addition, we are always willing to comply with the study, which triangulated with your own data to make the market research more comprehensive in your perspective.

Inquire more and share questions if any before the purchase on this report at -https://www.marketgrowthreports.com/enquiry/pre-order-enquiry/19866408

Detailed TOC of Global SDN and NFV Market Research Report 2022

1 SDN and NFV Market Overview

1.1 Product Overview and Scope of SDN and NFV
1.2 SDN and NFV Segment by Type
1.2.1 Global SDN and NFV Market Size Growth Rate Analysis by Type 2022 VS 2028
1.3 SDN and NFV Segment by Application
1.3.1 Global SDN and NFV Consumption Comparison by Application: 2022 VS 2028
1.4 Global Market Growth Prospects
1.4.1 Global SDN and NFV Revenue Estimates and Forecasts (2017-2028)
1.4.2 Global SDN and NFV Production Capacity Estimates and Forecasts (2017-2028)
1.4.3 Global SDN and NFV Production Estimates and Forecasts (2017-2028)
1.5 Global Market Size by Region
1.5.1 Global SDN and NFV Market Size Estimates and Forecasts by Region: 2017 VS 2021 VS 2028
1.5.2 North America SDN and NFV Estimates and Forecasts (2017-2028)
1.5.3 Europe SDN and NFV Estimates and Forecasts (2017-2028)
1.5.4 China SDN and NFV Estimates and Forecasts (2017-2028)
1.5.5 Japan SDN and NFV Estimates and Forecasts (2017-2028)

2 Market Competition by Manufacturers
2.1 Global SDN and NFV Production Capacity Market Share by Manufacturers (2017-2022)
2.2 Global SDN and NFV Revenue Market Share by Manufacturers (2017-2022)
2.3 SDN and NFV Market Share by Company Type (Tier 1, Tier 2 and Tier 3)
2.4 Global SDN and NFV Average Price by Manufacturers (2017-2022)
2.5 Manufacturers SDN and NFV Production Sites, Area Served, Product Types
2.6 SDN and NFV Market Competitive Situation and Trends
2.6.1 SDN and NFV Market Concentration Rate
2.6.2 Global 5 and 10 Largest SDN and NFV Players Market Share by Revenue
2.6.3 Mergers and Acquisitions, Expansion

3 Production Capacity by Region
3.1 Global Production Capacity of SDN and NFV Market Share by Region (2017-2022)
3.2 Global SDN and NFV Revenue Market Share by Region (2017-2022)
3.3 Global SDN and NFV Production Capacity, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2017-2022)
3.4 North America SDN and NFV Production
3.4.1 North America SDN and NFV Production Growth Rate (2017-2022)
3.4.2 North America SDN and NFV Production Capacity, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2017-2022)
3.5 Europe SDN and NFV Production
3.5.1 Europe SDN and NFV Production Growth Rate (2017-2022)
3.5.2 Europe SDN and NFV Production Capacity, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2017-2022)
3.6 China SDN and NFV Production
3.6.1 China SDN and NFV Production Growth Rate (2017-2022)
3.6.2 China SDN and NFV Production Capacity, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2017-2022)
3.7 Japan SDN and NFV Production
3.7.1 Japan SDN and NFV Production Growth Rate (2017-2022)
3.7.2 Japan SDN and NFV Production Capacity, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2017-2022)

4 Global SDN and NFV Consumption by Region
4.1 Global SDN and NFV Consumption by Region
4.1.1 Global SDN and NFV Consumption by Region
4.1.2 Global SDN and NFV Consumption Market Share by Region
4.2 North America
4.2.1 North America SDN and NFV Consumption by Country
4.2.2 United States
4.2.3 Canada
4.3 Europe
4.3.1 Europe SDN and NFV Consumption by Country
4.3.2 Germany
4.3.3 France
4.3.4 U.K.
4.3.5 Italy
4.3.6 Russia
4.4 Asia Pacific
4.4.1 Asia Pacific SDN and NFV Consumption by Region
4.4.2 China
4.4.3 Japan
4.4.4 South Korea
4.4.5 China Taiwan
4.4.6 Southeast Asia
4.4.7 India
4.4.8 Australia
4.5 Latin America
4.5.1 Latin America SDN and NFV Consumption by Country
4.5.2 Mexico
4.5.3 Brazil

Get a sample Copy of the SDN and NFV Market Report 2022

5 Segment by Type
5.1 Global SDN and NFV Production Market Share by Type (2017-2022)
5.2 Global SDN and NFV Revenue Market Share by Type (2017-2022)
5.3 Global SDN and NFV Price by Type (2017-2022)
6 Segment by Application
6.1 Global SDN and NFV Production Market Share by Application (2017-2022)
6.2 Global SDN and NFV Revenue Market Share by Application (2017-2022)
6.3 Global SDN and NFV Price by Application (2017-2022)

7 Key Companies Profiled
7.1 Company
7.1.1 SDN and NFV Corporation Information
7.1.2 SDN and NFV Product Portfolio
7.1. CSDN and NFV Production Capacity, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2017-2022)
7.1.4 Company’s Main Business and Markets Served
7.1.5 Company’s exact Developments/Updates

8 SDN and NFV Manufacturing Cost Analysis
8.1 SDN and NFV Key Raw Materials Analysis
8.1.1 Key Raw Materials
8.1.2 Key Suppliers of Raw Materials
8.2 Proportion of Manufacturing Cost Structure
8.3 Manufacturing Process Analysis of SDN and NFV
8.4 SDN and NFV Industrial Chain Analysis

9 Marketing Channel, Distributors and Customers
9.1 Marketing Channel
9.2 SDN and NFV Distributors List
9.3 SDN and NFV Customers

10 Market Dynamics
10.1 SDN and NFV Industry Trends
10.2 SDN and NFV Market Drivers
10.3 SDN and NFV Market Challenges
10.4 SDN and NFV Market Restraints

11 Production and Supply Forecast
11.1 Global Forecasted Production of SDN and NFV by Region (2023-2028)
11.2 North America SDN and NFV Production, Revenue Forecast (2023-2028)
11.3 Europe SDN and NFV Production, Revenue Forecast (2023-2028)
11.4 China SDN and NFV Production, Revenue Forecast (2023-2028)
11.5 Japan SDN and NFV Production, Revenue Forecast (2023-2028)

12 Consumption and Demand Forecast
12.1 Global Forecasted Demand Analysis of SDN and NFV
12.2 North America Forecasted Consumption of SDN and NFV by Country
12.3 Europe Market Forecasted Consumption of SDN and NFV by Country
12.4 Asia Pacific Market Forecasted Consumption of SDN and NFV by Region
12.5 Latin America Forecasted Consumption of SDN and NFV by Country

13 Forecast by Type and by Application (2023-2028)
13.1 Global Production, Revenue and Price Forecast by Type (2023-2028)
13.1.1 Global Forecasted Production of SDN and NFV by Type (2023-2028)
13.1.2 Global Forecasted Revenue of SDN and NFV by Type (2023-2028)
13.1.3 Global Forecasted Price of SDN and NFV by Type (2023-2028)
13.2 Global Forecasted Consumption of SDN and NFV by Application (2023-2028)
13.2.1 Global Forecasted Production of SDN and NFV by Application (2023-2028)
13.2.2 Global Forecasted Revenue of SDN and NFV by Application (2023-2028)
13.2.3 Global Forecasted Price of SDN and NFV by Application (2023-2028)

14 Research Finding and Conclusion

15 Methodology and Data Source
15.1 Methodology/Research Approach
15.1.1 Research Programs/Design
15.1.2 Market Size Estimation
15.1.3 Market Breakdown and Data Triangulation
15.2 Data Source
15.2.1 Secondary Sources
15.2.2 Primary Sources
15.3 Author List
15.4 Disclaimer

Continued….

Purchase this report (Price 4900 USD for a single-user license) -https://www.marketgrowthreports.com/purchase/19866408

About Us:

Market is changing rapidly with the ongoing expansion of the industry. Advancement in the technology has provided today’s businesses with multifaceted advantages resulting in daily economic shifts. Thus, it is very important for a company to comprehend the patterns of the market movements in order to strategize better. An efficient strategy offers the companies with a head start in planning and an edge over the competitors. Market Growth Reports is the credible source for gaining the market reports that will provide you with the lead your business needs.

Contact Us:

Market growth reports

Phone : US +1 424 253 0946

UK +44 203 239 8187

Email :sales@marketgrowthreports.com

Web : https://www.marketgrowthreports.com

For More Related Reports Click Here :

Aseptic Filling Machine for Vials Market

Hyperpigmentation Treatment Market

Contract Analytics Software Market

Press Release Distributed by The Express Wire

To view the original version on The Express Wire visit SDN and NFV Market Size is Increasing and Having a Big Impact on the Industry with PESTAL & SWOT Analysis till 2028 | No of Pages 116

COMTEX_409840532/2598/2022-07-07T23:53:40

Is there a problem with this press release? Contact the source provider Comtex at editorial@comtex.com. You can also contact MarketWatch Customer Service via our Customer Center.

The MarketWatch News Department was not involved in the creation of this content.

Thu, 07 Jul 2022 15:53:00 -0500 en-US text/html https://www.marketwatch.com/press-release/sdn-and-nfv-market-size-is-increasing-and-having-a-big-impact-on-the-industry-with-pestal-swot-analysis-till-2028-no-of-pages-116-2022-07-07
Killexams : Technology & Telecommunications Ranks as the Second Most Intimate Industry in MBLM's Brand Intimacy 2022 Study

NEW YORK, NY / ACCESSWIRE / July 6, 2022 / Technology & telecommunications ranked as the second most intimate industry in MBLM's Brand Intimacy 2022 Study, the largest study of brands based on emotions, now in its 12th year. The enhanced study combines MBLM's proven Brand Intimacy model with the power of AI and big data to analyze over 600 brands, assessing how consumers bond with the brands they use and love. Apple placed first in the industry, followed by Sony and Android. These three brands were also in the top 10 in the overall study, with Apple ranking third. Through its tech-powered research methodology, MBLM found that the top keyword for Apple on Twitter was the emoji "

MZHCI, LLC, Thursday, July 7, 2022, Press release picture

." Sony's top keyword was "Emotional" and Android's was "Excitement."

The remaining brands in the top 10 for tech & telecom are: Microsoft, Nvidia, HTC, HP, Adobe, IBM, and Dell. Consistent with previous years, MBLM also found that top intimate brands outperformed Fortune 500 top brands across profit, revenue, and stock performance.

"Tech & telecom has gradually moved up in our Brand Intimacy study over the years, which demonstrates the category's growing importance in our daily lives," stated Mario Natarelli, managing partner at MBLM. "This trend was accelerated by COVID, which caused us to rely heavily on technology to communicate, work, inform, entertain, socialize, and maintain our wellbeing. Brands leveraged this shift and have enhanced their services to become more ingrained in consumers' lives, a trend we see continuing, even as we have gradually returned to a new normal."

Tech & telecom has an average Brand Intimacy Quotient of 49.2, well above the cross-industry average of 36.8. The category has improved since MBLM's last study, where it ranked in fourth place, and improved its Quotient score performance by eight percent. Enhancement, which means that customers become better through use of the brand, is the dominant archetype for the industry.

In addition to the findings, MBLM also examined the industry and its #1 ranking brand Apple in an article entitled, "Ahead of the Curve: How Apple's Products and Services Consistently Help Build Emotional Connections." The article analyzes the top five brands and further explores Apple and how its focus on personalization helps it connect with consumers.

The Brand Intimacy 2022 Study contains the most comprehensive rankings of brands based on emotion. The scale of the study included more than 600 brands and more than 1.4 billion words analyzed over 2021.

To obtain the Brand Intimacy 2022 Study or explore the rankings click here.

Methodology

To read the study methodology, click here.

About MBLM

MBLM invented Brand Intimacy, the emotional science behind the brands we use and love. For our clients, we deliver expertise and value through our agency insights, services, and software offerings. With offices in five countries, our multidisciplinary teams invent, transform, and enhance brands for businesses of every kind. We deliver marketing that creates stronger emotional connections with stakeholders. These bonds create better performance and long-term returns. To learn more about how we can help you create and sustain ultimate brand relationships, visit mblm.com.

Contact:

Kati Waldenburg
MZ North America
kati.waldenburg@mzgroup.us
973-924-9797

SOURCE: MBLM

View source version on accesswire.com:
https://www.accesswire.com/707618/Technology-Telecommunications-Ranks-as-the-Second-Most-Intimate-Industry-in-MBLMs-Brand-Intimacy-2022-Study

Wed, 06 Jul 2022 02:43:00 -0500 en-CA text/html https://ca.finance.yahoo.com/news/technology-telecommunications-ranks-second-most-143700224.html
Killexams : Paving the way for the next generation audio codec for TRUE Wireless Stereo (TWS) applications - PART 4 : Achieving the ultimate audio experience

By Hai YU, Clément MOULIN (Dolphin Design)

In this fourth part of Paving the way for the next generation audio codec for True Wireless Stereo (TWS) applications whitepaper, the pure audio performance will be discussed.

Figure 1 highlights the function under discussion amongst the main functionalities embedded in earbuds


Fig.1: Functional blocks of a typical TWS earbud chip

1- Enhanced audio performance

Sound quality remains the number one purchase driver for both Bluetooth and smart speakers. According to “The State of Play Report 2020” (a global analysis of user behaviors and desires driving consumer audio) by Qualcomm, “Sound quality remains the single most important factor for audio lovers worldwide, as it has for several years — and is the only purchase criterion that is more influential to consumers that we surveyed than price”.

Many factors come into play for an enhanced customer experience and high-resolution audio quality for TWS chips (TWS earbuds/headsets), such as the key characteristics when selecting the appropriate microphone and speaker, the BLE (Bluetooth Low Energy) connection link, the codec format, the noise cancellation/reduction software used by the specific signal processing accelerator or hardware (e.g., DSP), etc. This paper focuses mainly on the key characteristics that should be considered in advance, to evaluate the audio codec IP for an enhanced audio user experience with TWS earbud applications. In this section, we discuss the pivotal considerations of audio codec IP, which are vital to ensure the high audio quality and user experience.

To achieve an enhanced, high-resolution audio quality, the choice of audio codec is critical as it is responsible for the audio/voice signal conversion (analog-to-digital and digital-to-analog) even though other factors also play a key role; however, the matching between the ADC and microphone, the matching between the DAC (headphone output) with the speaker, the audio signal conversion quality, etc. are the fundamental elements along the entire audio signal processing chain.


Fig.2: True Wireless Stereo (TWS) earbuds use (from: The State of Play Report 2020 Qualcomm)

2- Which architecture for TWS applications?

How does one choose the most appropriate ADC architecture for Audio-/Voice-First Devices (TWS earbuds or headsets) and their applications among so many different analog-to-digital converters (ADC) architectures? There are successive approximation register (SAR) ADCs, Sigma-Delta ADCs (or Delta-Sigma Modulator ADC, DSM), pipeline ADCs, integrated ADCs, and so on. The pipeline ADCs are mostly used for the highest sample rates such as RF applications and software-defined radios. Many TWS chip designer or SoC integrators have no idea how to select the right ADCs from the remaining topologies SAR ADC and Sigma-Delta ADC architecture for their digital audio applications.

  1. First and foremost, the Sigma-delta converters have an innate advantage over SAR ADCs: they require no special trimming or calibration, even to attain 16 to 24 bits of resolution. In addition, they do not require anti-aliasing filters with steep roll-offs at the analog inputs as their sampling rate, much higher than the effective bandwidth (based on the over-sampling architecture) allow to embedded digital decimation filters.
  2. One of the subtle issues is that most TWS SoC integrators select a SAR ADC is because of its less complex architecture and lower power consumption, compared to conventional Sigma-delta ADCs since the silicon area and power consumption is very demanding in TWS applications. This lower power consumption can lead to limited audio performance, however although SAR ADCs can achieve the same level of audio performance (SNR, THD, THD+N, etc.), they have a much higher input inferred noise floor (far over the microphone’s noise floor) making them unsuitable for the middle and far-field audio usage scenarios (we will elaborate on this later). Also SAR ADCs are not compatible with the MEMS digital microphones.
  3. Moreover, the advanced Sigma-delta ADCs can provide dual-mode operation to dynamically adapt to the audio performance/power consumption trade-off.
  4. Last, but not least, several advantageous features can be embedded in Sigma-delta ADCs, such as analog gain control stage before the Sigma-delta ADC to achieve higher dynamic range, and synchronized audio data frequency in both Sigma-delta ADC and DAC to reduce the crosstalk effects, programmable sampling frequency, and so on.

Dolphin Design’s ultra-high performance ADC and DAC

Dolphin Design’s 16 to 24-bit Sigma-delta high resolution ADC and DAC are specifically designed to be a perfect choice for Voice First Devices/Applications, with enhanced audio performance both on ADC and DAC, and more importantly their comprehensive codec architecture and design methodology which takes into account noise resilience features, microphone characteristics, headsets output amplifier, programmable analog gain control, etc..

First, we know that the audio codec is very sensitive noises (power supply noise, ambient noise, PGA noise, microphone noise, …), and these noises degrade audio performance. Therefore, the embedded ultra-low noise linear regulator is designed to provide the best resilience to power supply noise. Coupled with the embedded ultra-low noise input PGA and Integrated low-noise microphone bias for driving MEMS microphones, it will guarantee codec ultimate performances achievement. All these design precautions make the audio codec more robust to the noise sources. Moreover, and more importantly from the SoC integrator’s perspective, the contentious subjects that arise during audio integration are transparent, which dramatically eases the design cycle and thus shortens the time-to-market of the final audio product.

Dolphin Design’s ultra-low power and high-performance analog-to-digital converter (ADC) is based on a 16 to 24-bit Sigma-delta high resolution architecture with a recording path that targets Voice First Applications. in TSMC 22nm uLL process technology, the ADC SNR is 106 dB A-Weighted. The two-stage configurable fine-tuning (programmable gain step) gain control unit allows a wide Dynamic Range of 106 dB A-Weighted, and its high Dynamic Range makes it very suitable both for near-field and far-field voice application scenarios. Moreover, it offers an ultra-low input referred noise of 3.8 µVrms A-Weighted at PGA gain of +20 dB, which is a key parameter that determines whether the ADC input noise floor matches the microphone’s requirements. Lastly, its ultra-fast wake-up capability (< 1 ms) makes it an ideal companion for Voice Activity Detection (VAD) to provide ultimate power consumption reduction with Keyword spotting or voice-triggered applications.

Now looking at Dolphin Design’s high performance digital-to-analog converter (DAC) for the playback path, it is also based on 16 to 24-bit Sigma-delta high resolution architecture with very high SNR and ultra-low noise floor on headphone output, which delivers the best-in-class audio quality for music playback. The DAC can be programmed to different operating modes to meet different application requirements especially for power consumption reduction and optimization purposes. Given in TSMC 22nm uLL process technology, the SNR is 120 dB A-Weighted with a THD of -90 dB. The two-stage configurable fine-tuning (programmable gain step) gain control and highly programmable headphone amplifier works efficiently together with the DAC, and one stereo differential capless headset output to minimize the BoM cost, which makes it the perfect fit for TWS earbud chips, in terms of the enhanced performance, ultra-low noise floor on HP output and lower BoM cost.

Microphones are vital for providing the high-quality input that all the applications mentioned here need, to deliver an outstanding user experience and excellent audio quality. MEMS microphones with best-in-class audio quality specifications can deliver the required performance. Every microphone can record a range of sound pressure levels (SPLs); this is known as the dynamic range of a microphone. The upper limit of the dynamic range is defined as the acoustic overload point (AOP), while the lower limit is defined by the microphone’s self-noise. This lower threshold is known as the “noise floor” of a microphone, and it defines the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). A microphone cannot record any sound below its noise floor. A microphone can only pick up signals which have an SPL above its noise floor.

SNR and input range are important parameters for assessing individual microphone performance. TWS incorporates up to six microphones (3 microphones per earbud). Depending on the customer, either a high signal to noise ratio (SNR) or a low total harmonic distortion (THD) at high sound pressure levels (SPL) can be desired. Since the audio codec (ADC recording path) will interface directly with the microphone, it is best to ensure that the audio codec’s ADC matches the selected microphone in terms of noise issues to avoid degradation of the audio recording quality.

The main contributors that can degrade the audio recording quality are the ambient noise, the noise floor of the microphone, the noise from the biasing circuitry of the microphone, and the noise from the ADC and its associated Programmable Gain Amplifier (PGA), as shown in the Figure 3.

Fig.3: The main noise contributors

The SNR is often used as the decisive performance to match an audio ADC with a microphone; however, it is not so simple as SNRADC > SNRmicrophone. Two audio ADCs may have the same SNR but different noise floors, as the SNR of an ADC depends on its maximum input voltage and its noise floor. To ensure a match between the ADC and the microphone, both the SNR and (most importantly) the noise floor must be taken into consideration.

Therefore, the best way to determine whether the ADC matches the microphone requirements is to compute the input referred noise of the ADC. The input noise floor of the ADC is calculated as shown in the formula:

As an example, if we consider an ADC with 1.27 Vpp max input voltage swing (equivalent to 450 mVrms) and 85 dB of SNR, its input referred noise is equal to:


It is important to note that ADCs SNR often varies according to the gain of the PGA as shown in Figure 4. In our example the 85 dB SNR was obtained with a 0 dB input gain. This ADC offers a 75 dB SNR when the gain of the PGA is set to 20 dB. The new input referred noise is equal to:

Figure 4 illustrates the evolution of the noise floor when the PGA gain changes from 0 dB to 20 dB. In most cases, the ADC will have to convert signals with a magnitude below 100 mVrms. Consequently, as the microphone generates low magnitude signals, it is more relevant to consider the input inferred noise floor with a high PGA gain instead of the usual specified SNR at 0 dB.


Fig.4: The evolution of the noise floor with different PGA gains

The Dynamic Range has been introduced to characterize the dynamic range between the noise floor at the input during the highest gain setting, and the maximum input signal when the gain is set to 0 dB. The Dynamic Range is more representative of the microphone application requirement since it gives the maximum voltage dynamic over the complete gain range of the ADC.


Fig.5: Dynamic Range of the reference ADC

Figure 6 shows that the noise floor of the ADC is roughly equal to the one of the microphones, and the dynamic range of the microphone is fully covered by the performance of the reference ADC, therefore we can consider that the pairing of the microphone and the ADC has been properly performed.

Fig.6: The microphone and the ADC pairing

As to the design of the ANC earbuds in TWS applications, which microphone type is more suitable? Basically, it is highly recommended to select a microphone with high sensitivity, low power, high SNR and low THD (or THD+N) for TWS applications. There are some benefits of MEMS microphones (analog or digital) compared to Electret Condenser (ECM) microphone types, for instance, MEMS microphones have higher SNR, smaller package size, lower power and higher sensitivity than ECM microphones.

For the TWS earbuds and TWS Smart Speaker, MEMS microphones (especially digital ones) are more robust against the RF signals of Wi-Fi or Bluetooth, which improves voice pick-up quality and stability. In addition, since the TWS earbuds application is space-constrained, the usage of MEMS microphones becomes more attractive with their smaller package sizes, and the reduction in both printed circuit board area and component cost can be achieved due to the analog and digital circuitry included in the MEMS microphone construction. Consequently, MEMS microphones are highly recommended to be used in TWS earbud applications. For TWS earbuds with the ANC feature, from the cost perspective, the FF and FB used for hybrid ANC should use the analog MEMS microphone (two analog microphones must have the same characteristics), and the digital MEMS microphone should be used for phone calls.

This section explained the important role that audio codec plays in achieving an enhanced audio performance, matching the ADC with a microphone, specifying a microphone’s characteristics, applying it to a system’s gain staging, and why, although sensitivity is related to SNR, it is not an indication of the microphone’s quality as is SNR. Whether designing with an analog or digital MEMS microphone, this section should help a designer choose the best microphone for an application and get the fullest performance from that device.

ABOUT THE AUTHORS

Hai YU received his PhD in Nano and Micro Electrical Engineering in 2011 from TIMA laboratory, Grenoble Alpes University for his work on low-cost highly efficient fault tolerant processor design for mitigating the reliability issues in nanometric technologies. Hai joined Dolphin Design in 2012 and is currently working as Lead Application Engineer, focusing on Audio & Processing IPs platforms.

Clément MOULIN graduated from ENSEEIHT Toulouse in electronic and signal processing in 2006. After 8 year of leading hardware development in NFC domain, Clément joined Dolphin Design in 2020 and is currently working as an Application Engineer, focusing on Audio & Processing IPs platforms.

If you wish to obtain a copy of this white paper, click here

Mon, 03 May 2021 00:49:00 -0500 en text/html https://www.design-reuse.com/articles/49899/true-wireless-stereo-achieving-the-ultimate-audio-experience.html
HPE2-Z38 exam dump and training guide direct download
Training Exams List