C_TBW60_74 Question Bank are daily updated at killexams.com

Rather than squandering energy on one C_TBW60_74 digital book that contains obsolete inquiries, register at killexams.com and neglect to stress over refreshed C_TBW60_74 questions. We deal with it for you. Our group ceaselessly works for updates, substantial, and most recent C_TBW60_74 Exam dumps that are gotten from C_TBW60_74 PDF Questions.

Exam Code: C_TBW60_74 Practice exam 2022 by Killexams.com team
SAP Certified Application Associate - Modeling and Data Management with SAP
SAP Application learner
Killexams : SAP Application learner - BingNews https://killexams.com/pass4sure/exam-detail/C_TBW60_74 Search results Killexams : SAP Application learner - BingNews https://killexams.com/pass4sure/exam-detail/C_TBW60_74 https://killexams.com/exam_list/SAP Killexams : Federal Student Aid

All need-based awards and federal student aid, including federal loans, is based on your financial need and eligibility as determined by the Free Application for Federal Student Aid (FAFSA). Any U.S. citizen or permanent resident who is a student in a degree-granting program should submit a FAFSA to be considered for federal aid.

You must be admitted to a degree, diploma, or graduate-level certificate program and enrolled in at least 6 credits per semester to be eligible for federal financial aid. For a brief overview, obtain the Financial Aid Eligibility and Application Chart

See below for information on other factors that may affect federal aid eligibility.

For next steps, visit the Apply for Aid section and select the appropriate syllabu for your situation.

FAFSA Verification

On May 18, the U.S. Department of Education temporarily suspended most of the verification requirements for the remainder of the 2022-2023 academic year in order to provide relief to students and colleges facing challenges and barriers resulting from the ongoing national emergency.

The New School Office of Financial Aid has waived verification document requirements where applicable, but must continue to review Identity/Statement of Educational Purpose and High School Completion Status requests and resolve instances where conflicting information is discovered. Students who are currently in the process of submitting any remaining verification documents are still required to complete the verification process.  

Please review your financial aid portal on your MyNewSchool account for any financial aid requirements. Please submit any additional documents requested by our office to our Secure Drop-Box. For security reasons, please do not send sensitive personal information by email. If you have any questions about your requirements, please speak with a financial aid counselor. 

Satisfactory Academic Progress

Federal regulations require that colleges monitor the academic progress of each applicant for federal financial assistance, including loans, grants, and work-study awards. The New School is required to certify that each student receiving federal aid is making satisfactory academic progress (SAP) toward earning their degree. This determination of progress must be made at least once a year, typically at the end of the spring semester, after spring grades are released and before the Office of Financial Aid awards or disburses any federal aid funds for the next semester. 

Students who fail to meet the minimum SAP standards are placed on Financial Aid Suspension and are notified by email. If you are notified that you have been placed on Financial Aid Suspension, you can request that your financial aid eligibility be restored by submitting an Satisfactory Academic Progress Appeal form, accessible to eligible students through their Financial Aid Requirements on their MyNewSchool. Appeals will not be accepted after July 15. 

The full Satisfactory Academic Progress Policy is available for download.

Please note that decisions about academic probation and institutional scholarship eligibility are separate from the process of certifying that SAP standards are being met.

Fri, 25 Mar 2022 05:34:00 -0500 en text/html https://www.newschool.edu/financial-aid/federal/
Killexams : Lithan Genovate launches SAP Online Courses for Industry Professionals

Lithan Genovate (Pvt) Ltd launches its authorized SAP Training Centre for conducting SAP Online Courses in Sri Lanka for Industry Professionals

SAP (Systems Applications Product) is the world leader in Enterprise Applications with 44,000 customers & solutions spread in 120 countries and one of the largest software companies globally. SAP delivers a comprehensive range of solutions that empowers every aspect of business operations. By using SAP solutions, organizations of all sizes – Large, medium and small businesses can reduce costs, Boost performance, and gain the agility to respond to changing business needs.

SAP has become an integral part of the Sri Lankan business industry and has contributed in a large way in defining and transforming business processes across the globe. Keeping in mind the huge demand for SAP consultants which seems to be ever growing, SAP has launched an online course in SAP solutions MySAP for industry professionals through Lithan Genovate (Pvt) Ltd, Sri Lanka.
Online training in SAP my SAPERP is now available for various modules that include SD – Sales & Distribution, now termed as ‘Order Fulfillment’, HCM – Human Capital Management, MM – Procurement and Logistics, PP- Product De velopment and Manufacturing, FI- Financial Accounting CO – Controlling, ABAP – Advanced Business Application Programming, EP – Enterprise Portal and XI – Exchange Infrastructure.

SAP eAcademy thus offers aspiring professionals the opportunity to enroll in the SAP course through Lithan Genovate (Pvt) Ltd. The eAcademy labs have been carefully planned and designed with state of art technology and equipped with training facilities to aid the learner in the training process. Once registered the learners can walk into the eAcademy center at their convenient time from Monday to Saturday (8.30am to 9pm) and can learn at a pace most suitable to them. The course is of 200 hours duration and can be completed anytime within 5 months.

In conjunction with SAP Education’s proven curriculum, the eAcademy series addresses a wide range of individual learning styles. There is a whole lot of value add that is being offered to the learners starting with a help desk facility (a team of Subject Matter Expertise who help answer all doubts or clarifications during the learning process). That’s not all; the eAcademy series also comes with facilities such as web chat, mentor tips, discussion forums and net meeting all in all ensuring that the learner has ample support at any given point during the course.

The SAP e-Academy series makes it possible to obtain a globally recognized SAP certification thus opening a world of career opportunities. More information is available from the Lithan Genovate office located in Colombo.

Lithan Genovate Singapore is a leading specialist education and career services provider for selected professional communities in Asia. Lithan Genovate (Pvt) Ltd is a subsidiary of Genovate group, formed in Sri Lanka in 2005.

Lithan Genovate is the authorized SAP Education partner in Sri Lanka for SAP training and has been in the business for over six years. Lithan Genovate Sri Lanka is offering the entire range of SAP programs – refresher and full time academy courses as well as SAP consulting services. It programs are conducted by certified SAP trainers with extensive practical experience in user environments and have had remarkable success rates. Lithan Genovate offers the programs for both the corporate sector as well as individual consultants who wish to acquire the prestigious SAP certification.

Taking a step forward, Lithan Genovate has now launched the SAP eAcademy which will allow the participants to complete the SAP certified programs in 200 hours spread over 5 months at their convenience and makes the participant a part of an exclusive global work force.

Sun, 18 Jul 2021 15:59:00 -0500 text/html https://www.sundaytimes.lk/111127/Education/ed46.html
Killexams : Smart Learning Market Growth, Opportunities Business Scenario, Share, Growth Size, Scope, Key Segments and Forecast to 2026
Smart Learning Market Growth, Opportunities Business Scenario, Share, Growth Size, Scope, Key Segments and Forecast to 2026

“Blackboard (US), SMART Technologies (US), Cornerstone OnDemand (US), Pearson (UK), Adobe (US), IBM (US), Samsung (South Korea), Microsoft (US), Oracle (US), and SAP (Germany).”

Smart Learning Market by Component (Hardware, Software, and Services), Learning Type (Synchronous Learning and Asynchronous Learning), End User (Academic, Enterprises, and Government), and Region – Global Forecast to 2026

MarketsandMarkets forecasts the global Smart Learning Market size to grow from USD 36.7 billion in 2021 to USD 95.4 billion by 2026, at a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 21.0% during the forecast period. The rising significance of online-based learning in various economies, the increasing urbanization in emerging and developed economies, coupled with a growing middle-class population, and the increasing adoption of advanced technologies to make the learning experience more interactive and engaging are key factors for the growth of Smart leaning market.

Download PDF Brochure: https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/pdfdownloadNew.asp?id=571

By Component, the Hardware segment to hold the larger market size during the forecast period

The Hardware segment of the Smart Learning Market is projected to hold the larger market size in 2021. The Smart Learning market consists of hardware such as tablets, smartphones, laptops, personal digital assistants (PDAs), and notebooks, which help learners and teachers communicate using devices. The hardware segment is further classified into four sub-segments, namely interactive displays, interactive whiteboards, smartboards, and other hardware.

Scope of the Report

Report Metrics

Details

Market size available for years

2017-2026

Base year considered

2021

Forecast period

2021-2026

Forecast units

Value (USD Million)

Segments covered

By component, services, learning type, end user, and region

Regions covered

North America, Europe, APAC, MEA, Latin America

Companies covered

Blackboard (US), IBM (US), Samsung (South Korea), SMART Technologies (US), Adobe (US), Microsoft (US), Oracle (US), SAP (Germany), Google (US), BenQ (Taiwan), Cornerstone OnDemand (US), Pearson (UK), McGraw Hill (US), Cisco (US), Huawei (China), D2L (Canada), CrossKnowledge (France), Newrow (US), Ellucian (US), UpsideLMS (India), Edsys (India), Echo360 (US), Instructure (US), eCourseWiz (India), SkyPrep (Canada), Paradiso Solutions (US), Latitude CG (US), Knowledge Anywhere (US)

By Standalone Solutions, the LMS/LCMS segment to record the highest market size in 2021

Under the Standalone Solutions segment, the Learning Management System (LMS)/Learning Content Management System (LCMS) segment is expected to dominate the market during the forecast period. They solutions allow institutions to access educational content online, thereby enabling students to view materials using the web browser. LMS also includes features such as course management, test and assessment, and performance management for an efficient learning experience.

Request demo Pages: https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/requestsampleNew.asp?id=571

The key and emerging market players in the Smart Learning market include Blackboard (US), IBM (US), Samsung (South Korea), SMART Technologies (US), Adobe (US), Microsoft (US), Oracle (US), SAP (Germany), Google (US), BenQ (Taiwan), Cornerstone OnDemand (US), Pearson (UK), McGraw Hill (US), Cisco (US), Huawei (China), D2L (Canada), CrossKnowledge (France), Newrow (US), Ellucian (US), UpsideLMS (India), Edsys (India), Echo360 (US), Instructure (US), eCourseWiz (India), SkyPrep (Canada), Paradiso Solutions (US), Latitude CG (US), Knowledge Anywhere (US). These players have adopted various strategies to grow in the global Smart Learning market.

Blackboard is one of the leading providers of smart learning solutions. The company offers its solutions to K-12 institutions, higher education institutes, and government organizations. Blackboards strong portfolio includes Blackboard Learn, Blackboard Collaboration, Blackboard Ally, Blackboard, App, Blackboard Instructor, Blackboard, Unite, and Blackboard SafeAssign. In June 2021, Blackboard partnered with K16 Solutions to help Blackboard’s clients transition from Blackboard Learn to Blackboard Learn Ultra.

SMART Technologies is a leading provider of technology solutions that enable collaborations in schools and workplaces. The company offers products such as SMART Board interactive flat panel, interactive flat panels, SMART Board interactive whiteboards, and SMART Notebook collaborative learning software. In February 2021, SMART Technologies launched new enhancements for their SMART Learning Suite software. The new enhancements would help teachers to customize activities and Boost connections with students.

Browse Other reports:

Location Analytics Market by Component (Solutions and Services), Location Type (Indoor Location and Outdoor Location), Application, Deployment Mode, Organization Size, Industry Vertical, and Region (2022 – 2026)

Learning Management System (LMS) Market by Component (Solutions and Services), Delivery Mode (Distance Learning, Instructor-led Training, and Blended Learning), Deployment, User Type (Academic and Corporate), and Region (2022 – 2026)

Media Contact
Company Name: MarketsandMarkets™ Research Private Ltd.
Contact Person: Mr. Aashish Mehra
Email: Send Email
Phone: 18886006441
Address:630 Dundee Road Suite 430
City: Northbrook
State: IL 60062
Country: United States
Website: https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/Market-Reports/smart-digital-education-market-571.html

Mon, 01 Aug 2022 12:00:00 -0500 GetNews en-US text/html https://www.digitaljournal.com/pr/smart-learning-market-growth-opportunities-business-scenario-share-growth-size-scope-key-segments-and-forecast-to-2026
Killexams : Learning Management Systems Market Value for Higher Education is Set to Grow by USD 5.42 Billion, Progressing at a CAGR of 22.75% from 2021 to 2026

NEW YORK, July 29, 2022 /PRNewswire/ -- The Learning Management Systems Market for Higher Education is segmented by Deployment (on-cloud and on-premise) and Geography (North America, Europe, APAC, South America, and Middle East and Africa). Moreover, the Y-O-Y growth rate of 2022 for the market is estimated at 21.67%. The report also provides a detailed analysis of drivers & opportunities, top winning strategies, competitive scenario, future market trends, market size & estimations, and major investment pockets.

Technavio has announced its latest market research report titled Learning Management Systems Market for Higher Education by Deployment and Geography - Forecast and Analysis 2022-2026

For more additional information about the Learning Management Systems Market for Higher Education. BROWSE SUMMARY OF THE RESEARCH REPORT

Learning Management Systems Market for Higher Education Overview

LMS is a software application that enables the documentation, administration, tracking, reporting, and delivery of educational courses or training programs. It is also used to monitor the learner's progress so that actions can be taken accordingly. Streamlining of the learning process, the need for cost-effective, centralized learning solutions, and rising emphasis on aspects such as personalized learning and formative assessments have paved the way for higher penetration of LMS in the academic segment.

Vendor Insights

The learning management systems market for higher education report offers information on several market vendors, including Adobe Inc., AlphaLearn, Blackboard Inc., Cornerstone OnDemand Inc., D2L Corp., Docebo Inc., Epignosis, Instructure Inc., International Business Machines Corp., John Wiley and Sons Inc., Jzero Solutions Ltd., Learning Technologies Group Plc, Oracle Corp., Paradiso Solutions, PowerSchool Holdings Inc., SAP SE, Byteparity Technologies LLP, and Kochar Infotech Ltd among others. Moreover, the market is fragmented and the vendors are deploying organic and inorganic growth strategies to compete in the market.

  • Blackboard Inc. - The company offers learning management systems that work alongside by helping to leverage innovative technologies and services which include student retention to brand reputation management.

  • D2L Corp. - The company offers learning management systems that provides people with virtual and in-person instructor-led training sessions, eLearning, and playlists that work for organizations of all sizes.

  • Docebo Inc. - The company offers learning management systems that provides highly configurable interfaces that let the user define graphical navigation where users can set up an interface that meets their individual needs.

Find additional highlights on the vendors and their product offerings. REQUEST demo REPORT (INCLUDING GRAPHS & TABLES) OF THIS MARKET

Segmentation Analysis & Forecasts

  • By Deployment (on-cloud and on-premise)

  • By Geography (North America, Europe, APAC, South America, and Middle East and Africa)

DOWNLOAD demo COPY OF THIS REPORT Using Business Email ID to Gain Further Insights on the Market Contribution & Share of Various Segments & Regions on Higher Priority

Key Learning Management Systems Market for Higher Education Drivers:

Premium Learning Management Systems Market for Higher Education Trends:

Major Learning Management Systems Market for Higher Education Challenges:

Find additional information about market Drivers, Trends, & Challenges available with Technavio. READ demo REPORT OF THIS MARKET

Didn't Find What You Were Looking For? Customize Report-

Don't miss out on the opportunity to speak to our analyst and know more insights about this market report. Our analysts can also help you customize this report according to your needs. Our analysts and industry experts will work directly with you to understand your requirements and provide you with customized data in a short amount of time.

Speak to our Analyst now! to take full advantage of every opportunity using competitive analysis created just for you

Here are Some Similar Topics-

Next Gen Learning Management System (LMS) Market for Higher Education Growth, Size, Trends, Analysis Report by Type, Application, Region and Segment Forecast 2021-2025: The market value is set to grow by USD 4.05 billion, progressing at a CAGR of 30% from 2020 to 2025, as per the latest report by Technavio. 56% of the market's growth will originate from North America during the forecast period. US and Canada are the key markets for next gen learning management system (LMS) for higher education in North America. FIND MORE RESEARCH INSIGHTS HERE

Higher Education M-learning Market Growth, Size, Trends, Analysis Report by Type, Application, Region and Segment Forecast 2021-2025: The market value is set to grow by USD 3.44 billion, progressing at a CAGR of over 22% from 2020 to 2025, as per the latest report by Technavio. The higher education M-learning market vendors should focus on grabbing business opportunities from the non-learning applications segment as it accounted for the largest market share in the base year. FIND MORE RESEARCH INSIGHTS HERE

Learning Management Systems Market for Higher Education Scope

Report Coverage

Details

Page number

120

Base year

2021

Forecast period

2022-2026

Growth momentum & CAGR

Accelerate at a CAGR of 22.75%

Market growth 2022-2026

$ 5.42 billion

Market structure

Fragmented

YoY growth (%)

21.67

Regional analysis

North America, Europe, APAC, South America, and Middle East and Africa

Performing market contribution

APAC at 30%

Key consumer countries

US, Canada, China, UK, and Germany

Competitive landscape

Leading companies, competitive strategies, consumer engagement scope

Companies profiled

Adobe Inc., AlphaLearn, Blackboard Inc., Cornerstone OnDemand Inc., D2L Corp., Docebo Inc., Epignosis, Instructure Inc., International Business Machines Corp., John Wiley and Sons Inc., Jzero Solutions Ltd., Learning Technologies Group Plc, Oracle Corp., Paradiso Solutions, PowerSchool Holdings Inc., SAP SE, Byteparity Technologies LLP, and Kochar Infotech Ltd

Market Dynamics

Parent market analysis, Market growth inducers and obstacles, Fast-growing and slow-growing segment analysis, COVID 19 impact and future consumer dynamics, market condition analysis for forecast period,

Customization preview

If our report has not included the data that you are looking for, you can reach out to our analysts and get segments customized.

Table of Contents

1 Executive Summary

2 Market Landscape

3 Market Sizing

4 Five Forces Analysis

5 Market Segmentation by Deployment

6 Customer Landscape

7 Geographic Landscape

8 Drivers, Challenges, and Trends

9 Vendor Landscape

10 Vendor Analysis

11 Appendix

About Us

Technavio is a leading global technology research and advisory company. Their research and analysis focuses on emerging market trends and provides actionable insights to help businesses identify market opportunities and develop effective strategies to optimize their market positions. With over 500 specialized analysts, Technavio's report library Their client base consists of enterprises of all sizes, including more than 100 Fortune 500 companies. This growing client base relies on Technavio's comprehensive coverage, extensive research, and actionable market insights to identify opportunities in existing and potential markets and assess their competitive positions within changing market scenarios.

Contact

Technavio Research
Jesse Maida
Media & Marketing Executive
US: +1 844 364 1100
UK: +44 203 893 3200
Email: media@technavio.com
Website: www.technavio.com/

Technavio (PRNewsfoto/Technavio)

Cision

View original content to obtain multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/learning-management-systems-market-value-for-higher-education-is-set-to-grow-by-usd-5-42-billion-progressing-at-a-cagr-of-22-75-from-2021-to-2026--301595510.html

SOURCE Technavio

Fri, 29 Jul 2022 09:35:00 -0500 en-US text/html https://www.yahoo.com/now/learning-management-systems-market-value-213500679.html
Killexams : Baden-Wurttemburg Exchange Program

Connecticut College students are able to participate in the Baden-Württemberg Exchange Program between the State of Connecticut and the state of Baden-Württemberg. Once accepted, students may choose from one of nine universities in Baden-Württemberg: Heidelberg, Freiburg, Tübingen, Karlsruhe, Ulm, Stuttgart, Hohenheim, Mannheim and Konstanz.

For full program details, please visit the Baden-Württemberg Exchange Program.

Location of Baden-Württemberg

Situated in the southwestern part of Germany, Baden-Württemberg shares its borders with France, Switzerland, and Austria. This region is filled with picturesque beauty and historical landmarks: Heidelberg Castle, the Black Forest and Lake Constance.

This region is also a powerful economic engine within Europe. Some of the world's most successful companies are located here: Mercedes-Benz (Daimler-Chrysler), Porsche and the German computer software giant SAP. Connecticut chose well, wouldn't you say, when it formed a state-to-state partnership with Baden-Württemberg over a dozen years ago!

Student Eligibility

  1. The BW-Exchange is for undergraduate and graduate students. Undergraduates are eligible to participate any time after completing their freshman year.
  2. Students must have a cumulative GPA of 2.5 or above and have demonstrated that they are mature, self-directed learners who will receive the most satisfaction from experiencing German university life as an insider
  3. Students planning to take regular German university courses will find that they can do so with less frustration if they have completed a minimum of four semesters or more of college-level German.
  4. Students who have achieved less than intermediate level proficiency in German can strengthen their language skills the first semester by taking an intensive language course (20 hours per week) in the Deutsch als Fremdsprache program (DaF) at their German university. You can obtain examples of the various DaF programs from the BW-Exchange Director.
  5. Students who choose the above option can supplement their intensive German language studies with one or two university courses taught in English. Many departments offer a selection of courses taught by visiting professors from English-speaking countries, which vary from one semester to the next.

For further information and application materials. see Geoffrey Atherton ((860) 439-2292, or contact the Baden-Württemberg Exchange, Department of Higher Education Hartford, CT 06105 with contact information provided on the Baden-Württemberg Exchange Program website.

Sat, 13 Feb 2016 19:03:00 -0600 en text/html https://www.conncoll.edu/academics/majors-departments-programs/departments/german/study-away/baden-wurttemburg-exchange-program/
Killexams : The Lifetime Learner

WRITTEN BY: John Hagel III, John Seely Brown, Roy Mathew, Maggie Wooll & Wendy Tsu

A new business landscape is emerging wherein a multitude of small entities will bring products and services to market using the infrastructure and platforms of large, concentrated players. The forces driving this are putting new and mounting pressures on organizations and individuals while also opening up new opportunities. But traditional postsecondary educational institutions are not supporting individuals in successfully navigating this not-too-distant future, nor are the educational institutions immune to these forces. Perhaps more than any other sector, postsecondary education is being affected by changing demand as the learning needs and preferences of the individual consumer rapidly evolve. Increasingly, individuals need both lifelong learning and accelerated, on-demand learning, largely as a response to the pressures of the broader evolving economic landscape.

Rarely seen amid gross national statistics on the skills gap, employability, completion rates, and tuition hikes is a serious discussion of the unmet, and increasingly disparate, needs and expectations of individual learners. The costs to the individual are increasing, and the payoff is less certain. Students of all ages are more comfortable with technology and are less tied to traditional notions of the academy as fewer American adults between the ages of 18 and 22 achieve a four-year, full-time, campus-based degree.1 At the same time, technological advances reduce the lifespan of specific skills, and an increasingly globalized and automated workforce needs to continuously learn and retrain.

As a result of a growing set of unmet needs and lower barriers to entry and commercialization, a new ecosystem of educational players is emerging, largely independent of the traditional educational landscape. This rich ecosystem of semi-structured, unorthodox learning providers is emerging at the edges of the current postsecondary world, with innovations that challenge the structure and even existence of traditional education institutions. These challengers are extending the education space beyond grades, degrees, and certificates to provide lifelong learning in a variety of formats and levels of effectiveness.

What does this mean for traditional players and the educational landscape? Similar to what is occurring more broadly, the emerging landscape will consist of a few large, concentrated players that will provide infrastructure, platforms, and services to support a wide array of fragmented niche providers of content, formats, environments, and experiences. Existing institutions—educational institutions, educational publishers, and corporate training departments—would do well to understand the diversity of the emerging landscape and the needs and preferences they reflect in order to help define sustainable roles in this new landscape. Existing institutions will likely have to choose what roles they can play sustainably and where they should be integrating emerging players and tools to support the learning needs of the future.

Profile of a learner

Meet Christine. After earning an undergraduate English literature degree, she taught English to adults in Portugal for two-and-a-half years before returning to school to earn a master’s degree in journalism in an immersive two-year program. She worked as a reporter at the Seattle Times and then became managing editor at a city-based weekly. She spent the next two years working as an editor at an Internet health site, and then freelancing as an editor and writer for online publications. Dissatisfied with the online writing world and with print newspapers struggling, she returned to school for a law degree. After a year in a big firm, she opened her own practice focused on representing youth removed from their parents for neglect or abuse. To balance against the high stress and emotion of the work, Christine took an 18-month-long series of weekend and evening classes to become a certified yoga instructor. Christine’s love of literature never left her, so in her spare time she enrolled in a six-week evening class in novel writing at the Grotto, a community of working writers. From this class, she formed a writing group that continued to meet biweekly for several years—since then, three members have completed their novels. Several years later, with state budget cuts threatening the financial viability of her juvenile practice, she began taking online courses and attending conferences and seminars to earn certification in elder law, and in 2011 opened an elder law practice. She just completed a 20-hour conflict coaching course and hopes to use those skills both in an informal way in her law practice and as a separate discipline. She also is enrolled in a 40-hour mediation training and intends to add mediation services to her repertoire. Christine is 47.

Meet Al. He earned a degree in chemical engineering from a large state school and went to work for a leading metals manufacturer in quality control. Over the years, he became more involved in the development of first aluminum and then beryllium alloys and worked at a series of companies in the Midwest experimenting with a growing assortment of metal alloys. Throughout this time, he took occasional night school courses on subjects relating to his work at the Carnegie Institute in Pittsburgh and at Case in Cleveland, sometimes reimbursed by his employers. In the 1960s, he began using “timesharing” computing practices for statistical analysis of masses of data. Al has retired from a major industrial manufacturing conglomerate and lives in a university town where he occasionally attends special lectures. He says that he would have “trouble trying to live without the availability of all the information, the ease of communications, and the speed with which it can be accomplished.” He uses YouTube to learn new knitting techniques and once a week attends a “sit and knit” at a community center where he and the other knitters trade tips and help each other figure out complex patterns. He provides instruction to the “newbies” who drop in and makes cancer caps for a local charity. A technophile, Al visits the Apple Genius Bar® service and support program or the Best Buy Geek Squad when he occasionally gets stuck on one of his many devices, and also relies on reviews and Internet forums, such as the best voice-to-text dictation and translation software to help him communicate with the non-English-speaking patients at the hospice center where he volunteers five days a week. Al is 97.

Meet Britney. She discovered a thirst for entrepreneurship while earning an undergraduate business degree from a top university. A finance major with some knowledge of business analytics, she realized that she needed a technological skill set to start her own ventures. As a result, while still in school, Britney sought out massive online open courses (MOOCs) as the stepping stone to learning how to code. She started taking online courses through several sources. Through these free online courses, she learned coding outside of the traditional classroom setting at her own pace, cost- and grade-free. The MOOCs gave her a technical foundation and new clarity about wanting to pursue a career in programming, but she struggled to assemble a coherent curriculum from the offerings. To move from being an enthusiast to employable, Britney enrolled in a nine-week intensive Dev Bootcamp course in San Francisco to develop her skills enough to begin freelancing. Now Britney goes to Meetups to make connections and learn about new opportunities, and she uses the Dev Bootcamp alumni network to seek contract work. She wants to travel and create technological analytic solutions for social impact issues and is building a portfolio of projects. Britney is 24.

Meet Sarah. After graduating from high school, Sarah enrolled in a vocational-technical program to earn certification as a beautician. Working at a series of salons, Sarah saved money and enrolled in a state school while continuing to work part-time. Two years into her studies, she married a soldier and spent the next several years moving from place to place and starting a family. Sarah returned to salon work to supplement the family income, learning the latest techniques from her coworkers and industry publications. As her children got older, she resumed college courses through a distance-learning program with her original school, earned her teaching certification, and began teaching kindergarten in a large, challenging public school. Now, with her children a few years from leaving home, Sarah can start to think about what comes next. Sarah is 43.

THE SHIFTING FOUNDATIONS OF THE EDUCATIONAL LANDSCAPE

In the book A More Beautiful Question, Warren Berger suggests that the true focus of education should be on encouraging students to question and explore rather than on delivering a canon of knowledge to students.2 This stands in stark contrast to the current pressure on traditional educational institutions to provide job-driven curricula to better meet the needs of the economy. With skyrocketing costs, a growing student-debt crisis, and the perception of a widening gap between institutional curricula and employer needs, more attention is being focused on the value provided by different types of traditional educational institutions, specifically four-year universities, two-year community colleges, and trade or vocational schools. Yet, as undersecretary of education Ted Mitchell explains, the value of education can be thought of in several ways: “There is economic value for the individual, economic value for society, but there is also civic value for society and having good, engaged citizens.”3

Unfortunately, the conversations revolving around skill-based training, financing reform, and improved access in many ways ignore the broader shift occurring in the global business environment. As detailed in The hero’s journey to the business landscape of the future,4 rapid advances in technology and a trend toward public policies that allow labor, resources, and capital to flow more easily across borders are shaping a future economic landscape in which a relatively few large, concentrated players will provide infrastructure, platforms, and services that support many fragmented, niche players. Individuals and institutions alike will have to chart a path through this future (figure 1).

This emerging landscape, and the underlying forces driving it, can have direct implications for education, learning, and other aspects of society. First, exponential advances in the core digital technologies that permeate all industries are leading to exponential, cumulative innovations that are blurring boundaries between once-separate domains and industries, disrupting business and the workforce in ways that are difficult to imagine or predict.5 In such an environment, greater collaboration between industry and academia alone cannot ensure a well-trained, well-targeted workforce. Second, in this global and networked environment, fixed knowledge stocks have decreasing value, while more fluid knowledge, specifically participation in diverse information flows that lead to the creation of new knowledge, becomes more important. As such, education as a one-way transfer of a canon of knowledge is inadequate, and the characteristics that defined education in the 20th century—bound by time and place, with a fixed curriculum—cannot keep up with the rapid rate of change or the new demands on knowledge and learning.6

Most traditional institutions—educational institutions, educational publishers, and corporate training departments—have not yet made the shift from knowledge stocks to knowledge flows. As a result, the traditional learning pathways for acquiring skills and credentials and securing employment are in flux. The institutions that have defined those pathways (see figure 2) are being challenged by a growing array of unorthodox learning providers who are experimenting not only with delivering educational content faster, cheaper, and on demand but also with entirely new learning experiences.

The underlying forces putting pressure on institutions and opening the door for new opportunities and entrants are unlikely to subside. This will drive changes in the postsecondary educational landscape as in most other industries, and it will also continue to increase demand for a richer, more diverse learning ecosystem to help individuals navigate the future landscape.

THE NEEDS OF THE INDIVIDUAL LEARNER IN THE 21ST CENTURY

Individuals increasingly face the prospect of not just multiple jobs but multiple careers over a lifetime, and of constantly changing technology and environments within a job. As Robin Chase, former CEO and founder of ZipCar, puts it, “Our parents had one job, I will have seven jobs, and our children will do seven jobs at one time.”7 As the expectations for employment and fulfillment change, continuous and lifelong learning becomes increasingly important. Individuals are looking for not just learning but guidance in navigating the changing world to find the best learning and career opportunities. The growth in life coaching and self-help books, now $2 billion and $11 billion industries respectively, is an early signal of this need.8

Individuals are also challenged by an accelerating cycle of skill obsolescence in a period of unprecedented transition from skill set to skill set. The rapidly changing business landscape demands constant learning of new skills and domains, retraining, and applying existing capabilities in new contexts. It also demands a greater fluency in digital tools and comfort in virtual environments. It rewards those with greater capacity to seek and access resources and to build social capital through personal networks and participation in communities. While globalization has opened opportunities for new jobs and careers internationally, it has also in some cases narrowed opportunities as certain types of employment migrate to nations with lower labor costs. In manufacturing and IT, for example, 53 percent and 43 percent of US companies, respectively, engage in offshore outsourcing, displacing as many as 2.6 million jobs.9 What happens, then, to the individuals who must recalibrate their careers for options that their education may not have equipped them for?

Predicting which skills and jobs are vulnerable to obsolescence is no longer straightforward, either. Beyond globalization, the 21st-century work environment is what Michael Gove, former UK secretary of state for education, termed a “new machine age,” where breakthroughs in automation, robotics, and even artificial intelligence have begun replacing jobs once thought to be the domain of human workers.10 Fujitsu, Canon, and Amazon are but a few examples of organizations that have automated significant portions of the assembly and fulfillment processes.11

Changing preferences for autonomy, and the ability to find meaningful work that satisfies those preferences, are also starting to redefine traditional career paths. Many individuals have left large companies for smaller firms or become self-employed as the traditional promises of stability, income and career progression, health care, and training and development opportunities once tied to large companies have been broken. In addition, retirement-age workers who do not retire, either because of financial needs or a desire to continue to make an impact, are also moving from large companies with retirement programs to smaller businesses or self-employment. While the average worker today switches jobs every 4.4 years, the independent workforce has grown from 16.1 million in 2011 to 17.7 million in 2013.12 The switch from large to small or independent often requires a new skill set even when the occupation builds off of experiences in a former job or role. Independent workers, as much as their employed peers, continue to need professional development and learning opportunities to maintain and refresh skills, but they have to seek it from external sources. Most small companies, if they offer training at all, also turn to outside sources for professional development, and even larger companies have reduced investment in internal training and development opportunities for employees.

The shelf life and relevance of skills are decreasing, while new occupations, roles, titles, and functions are being created at a rapidly accelerating pace. In an oDesk survey asking hiring employers to rank the criteria for their hiring decisions, a college degree ranked last. The No. 1 criterion was a person’s previous performance on a similar or related task.13 Moreover, by 2020, it is estimated that the work-related knowledge a college student acquires will have an expected shelf life of less than five years.14 Fabio Rosati, the CEO of Elance (which recently merged with oDesk), states, “The technologies that were relevant even two to three years ago are different than the technologies that are going to be relevant in the next two to three years, [and that’s moving] at increased speed.”15 From an occupational perspective, according to career networking platform LinkedIn, the top 10 job titles used by employees today (including iOS developer, social media analyst, big data architect, cloud services specialist, and digital marketing specialist) did not even exist five years ago.16 What are the options for the approximately 16.4 million students who graduated from higher education institutions just 10 years ago and now want to pursue a career in one of these jobs that didn’t exist then?17

Profile of a learner

1) Navigational guidance to select the best options

2) Continual challenges and learning

3) Affordability

4) Job placement

5) Relevant skills and contextual application

6) Flexible and compressed timeframes

7) Intangible skills and tacit/experiential learning

8) Professional development (for independent workers, workers at small companies, and workers at companies where training budgets have been cut)

9) Network and community of practitioners

In addition to the pressure to continuously adapt to the forces that are reshaping the business landscape, the cost-benefit equation for individuals considering any form of traditional education has changed. Tuition costs have grown in absolute terms and are part of a long-term trend of state and federal governments shifting the cost burden to students and their families. In fact, 71 percent of students graduating from four-year universities have debt averaging $30,000, a 20 percent increase since the recession. Even 88 percent of Pell Grant recipients had student loan debt greater than the national average of $25,550 for public universities.18 While tuition costs have gone up, job placement rates from four-year institutions have decreased, with 40 percent of accurate college graduates unemployed in the first year, and others underemployed.19 This changes the equation for individuals as they consider their options, and alternative learning pathways become more appealing.

Add to this equation a potential student, very much a consumer, who is comfortable with technology and accustomed to getting information from a variety of online sources. This description isn’t limited to Millennials, who have undeniably grown up with a different expectation for the pace and engagement of their learning environments, are fluent in social media, and easily transition to new platforms. Across virtually all generations, people turn more readily to the Internet as a resource for entertainment and information; education and learning aren’t such a leap. Some of these learners are the same accurate students who didn’t complete degree programs, who graduated but failed to find employment, or who saw friends or family members sink under runaway student debt. In addition, with more visibility into options, as with other aspects of their lives, consumers are seeking out those that match their preferences for faster, more flexible, or more experiential formats.

Finding new ways to empower learners and support their unmet lifelong learning needs is an attractive opportunity for new entrants. But with a shifting student profile—currently the “modal student is 36 years old and doing school on the side”—traditional educational institutions, if they want to stay relevant and viable, must also find new ways to better address the unmet needs of a variety of learners.20 It is no surprise that new forms and institutions are emerging and gaining credibility, in part as a consequence of the slow response and inability of traditional institutions—not just educational but government and corporate as well—to keep up with these evolving needs.

AN EMERGING ECOSYSTEM SERVING LEARNERS AT THE EDGES

Much has been written about “the higher education crisis” and the multilayered organizational inertia, policies, and practices that hinder innovation and change within traditional educational institutions. Those arguments are valid, but we would suggest that by focusing internally they miss the competition coming from the “edges,” from unexpected places and sectors. These new entrants in education are unlikely to look like the incumbents; lowered barriers allow competitors to offer individual components of what traditional institutions (four- and two-year colleges, vocational schools, and corporate training) provide.

New entrants are innovating all along the learning spectrum. A rich ecosystem of unorthodox learning providers is emerging at the edges to experiment with technologies and approaches—in some cases to try to deliver a component of traditional education in new ways that reduce costs, Boost effectiveness, or increase accessibility (faster, on demand); and in some cases to offer something entirely new with different goals that cannot necessarily be judged by traditional metrics of time-in-seat, completion, or assessment scores.

The eroding barriers to innovation in learning

In The hero’s journey through the landscape of the future, we examine, across industries, how the barriers to entry, commercialization, and learning are being dramatically impacted by technological advances, ubiquitous connectivity, and more empowered and digitally savvy consumers. In particular, we study the way these forces have shifted consumer power and preferences, how they have lowered barriers to new entrants in education and opened the doors to innovation in learning, and the platforms that have come out of these forces.

One potent example is the availability of financing for education technology.21 What began as a trickle—$64 million of investment in 2009—has swollen into a flood, with $1.25 billion, an increase of 35 percent, invested in the education technology market in 2013.22 Much of the growth has been in informal, lifelong learning: MOOCs, professional development, and professional skills were the education categories most funded by venture capitalists in Q2 2014. San Francisco-based Udemy, a MOOC platform specializing in helping individuals Boost skills related to career and life, raised $32 million in series C funding of new ventures.23

The growth of venture funding in this space is allowing more entrants with potentially disruptive technologies in content creation, access, tools, and formats to directly impact lifelong learning. Platforms such as Udemy and Udacity have opened a content creation ecosystem that was originally restricted to academics, administrators, and publishers to include new entrants such as engineers, designers, data scientists, coaches, and others with a desire to share their expertise. While the offerings in education technology are still nascent, and many will fail to either become viable business models or provide long-term value to learning, the increased investment in the informal learning space signals consumer and market appetite for learning experiences that extend beyond an education bound by time or location.

While access to financing has become relatively less of a hurdle, other barriers remain, not impassable but not yet negligible. The desirability and superiority of a four-year college education is deeply embedded in American culture and policy, with the consequence that even the best alternative forms of education are viewed as inferior compromises. As a result, and with the notion of meritocracy, the higher education conversation tends to revolve around access and outcomes. Ted Mitchell, US undersecretary of education, summarizes the administration’s agenda as “access, affordability, quality, and completion,” with the goal of providing the highest level of education for which people qualify.24 The assumption is that the ranking of options remains unchanged. For new entrants to gain traction, they will have to overcome the barriers around brand, acceptance by employers, and comfort with non-authoritative sources of learning and warranting. While these barriers may be slower to fall, emerging players will likely gain momentum from the increasing desire for participation in learning, relative affordability (particularly if new entrants gain acceptance by federal/state funding sources), and flexibility (which reflects the increasing diversity of learners, for example, transitioning/reentering workers such as veterans and senior citizens).

Where are the edges?

Currently, new entrants primarily exist in parallel to traditional postsecondary education institutions, but they are beginning to compete with traditional paths. New entrants are emerging in five arenas, mostly centered around the individual:

  1. The workforce: As workers recognize the importance of continuous learning, they are more actively seeking learning opportunities. In 2013, 23 percent of employees left their jobs citing the lack of opportunities for professional development and training.25 Companies are starting to realize the need to provide more and different training opportunities that better suit each unique worker, allowing workers to develop relevant and marketable skills. Companies such as SAP have started to create their own MOOC-based platforms, like openSAP, to allow subject matter experts within the workforce to create relevant and timely content for others. Rather than fund expensive training departments, others are turning to outside providers such as Udemy for flexible, relevant content.
  2. Independent agents: The growth in the independent workforce, together with the lack of formal training and development programs in small companies, leaves a large population of individuals who are accustomed to managing their own careers looking for external solutions so that they can continue to learn and retrain. This is where specialized programs such as coding-intensive boot camps (for example, Dev Bootcamp, Hack Reactor, and Codeacademy), Meetups, and MOOCs are emerging.26
  3. Passion arenas: Passionate workers, specifically those who embrace challenges as opportunities to learn and who connect with others to find solutions and make a meaningful impact on an area of interest, want to share that passion with others. As a result, the need to share and connect with other passionate individuals manifests itself as social communities and creation spaces where learning and connection can blossom around significant challenges.27
  4. Emerging countries: Access to education is a necessary element for economic prosperity, particularly in developing countries. The global demand for learning through more inexpensive, pull-based, flexible models is leading to experiments with new platforms and environments to make learning accessible to a rapidly changing world. Free MOOCs are one example, but so is the global network of institutions owned by Laureate Education, or New York University’s global academic centers that have a mission to provide access within a country.
  5. K-12: The learning habits and preferences of students move with them, and experiments that began in the K-12 space might translate into the postsecondary world. For example, AltSchool, a new network of K-8 schools in the Bay area, is experimenting with ways to make the experience of learning more flow-based and immersive. AltSchool focuses learning around microschools where the neighborhood playground serves as the gym and the science class on liquid nitrogen takes place at the local ice cream shop.28 Consider, also, the example of Khan Academy. In providing short, modular, on-demand, self-paced math instruction to the K-12 audience for the past seven years, Khan Academy has been refining the platform and techniques for engaging learners in personalized curricula focused on skills mastery.29 As its target audience moves beyond secondary school, the lessons learned by Khan Academy may prove extensible into higher-level material or into other subjects or curricula, whether that will be carried forward by Khan Academy or others. This format is already migrating into other K-12 flipped classroom30 ventures and will likely prove applicable to a variety of other learning needs.

What types of innovations are emerging?

As the barriers to innovation have been lowered, new entrants and incumbents have innovated in four different areas, each of which transforms learning into more of a flow-oriented activity (figure 3). None of these emerging innovations is likely to supplant traditional education on its own. Collectively, however, they represent a rich and growing ecosystem of providers and learning opportunities that have the potential to disrupt education.

Innovation 1: Accessibility

The Internet has democratized learning by increasing access to content for a growing population of learners. This accessible content, structured both as formal educational content and informal informational content (which is ever growing and includes platforms such as YouTube and discussion boards), is the basis of virtual knowledge flows. In a networked era, learning can be more flow-oriented, opening both content and content creation to a larger pool of people. For example, the Open Educational Resources (OER) movement, spearheaded by MIT’s OpenCourseWare initiative in 2001, encourages providing access to teaching, learning, research, and assessment materials under open licenses that permit free use and modification for a variety of educational purposes. OER is part of a global movement toward increasing access to content, enabling knowledge to flow and be built upon rather than commoditized.31 The movement has spawned other OER platforms, from iTunes U®, a feature of the online store that allows users to organize course lectures, notes, and books for an entire course, to Connexions, a platform that provides authors and learners with an open space to share and freely adapt education materials.32 The OER movement changes not only the way professors engage with content, but also how the learner engages with content so that the learning experience is more personalized, adaptable, and affordable. In 2012, in an effort to reduce costs to students, the University of Minnesota created a tool to help faculty find more affordable textbook options. The resulting Open Academics textbook catalog lists “open textbooks,” which are under a license that enables students to get free or low-cost versions of textbooks while being able to adapt and distribute the material as well. The Open Academics catalog, with over 84 open textbooks, is the first of its kind and is available to faculty worldwide.33

While OER is primarily focused on materials, which can be mixed and modified but are not, in and of themselves, developed as full courses, MOOCs are full courses or mini-courses developed and guided by an instructor and designed for large-scale participation. The OER movement has largely focused on improving access to content for instructors, while MOOCs expand access to an educational experience through digital learning platforms. For example, a course on machine learning, taught by Professor Andrew Ng of the Stanford Artificial Intelligence Lab, is now available for free to 4.5 million users rather than only to Stanford students.34 MOOC platforms such as Udacity, EdX, and Udemy democratize access to educational content, allowing individuals to participate in knowledge flows regardless of geographic borders and organizational boundaries.

OER still needs to find answers to the problems of credibility and validation (such as peer review) while maintaining timeliness, diversity, and quality of content. MOOCs also, rather than replacing instruction, are coming to be understood as a tool for delivering certain types and levels of content in the most cost-effective way and as a supplement to in-person, expert-guided learning and practice.

OER and MOOCs serve as stepping stones for rethinking how content can be developed, structured, and delivered to the global masses. In some parts of the world, they represent convenience—learning on demand—while in others, they are revolutionary. By democratizing accessibility to content, in terms of both the number of learners and number of courses available, learning shifts from being a protected stock-based resource to a flow where learners from the broader ecosystem can engage with previously unavailable information.

Innovation 2: Social learning

One of the most profound effects of learning in a networked age is the importance of social learning.35 Social learning, according to the Educause Review, is based on the premise that our understanding of content is socially constructed through conversations about the content rather than on the content itself. As such, learning institutions should focus less on what the individual is learning than on how the individual is learning.

From physical collaboration settings (such as libraries and coworking spaces) to virtual collaboration settings (forums, blogs, online communities), the ability for the individual to interact with others through multiple channels is expanding. Increasingly, we see a movement toward communities of social learning that focus on interaction and engagement beyond the four walls of a traditional learning institution. For example, at events such as Meetups, learners can interact with others from different backgrounds, getting exposed to serendipitous learning opportunities and, potentially, new collaborators with whom they can take on challenges.

Case study: MOOC Meetups everywhere

In the ongoing evolution of MOOCs and other digital learning, organizations are experimenting with Meetups to fill the role of the social learning environment that is characteristic of the traditional college experience. Meetup, founded in 2002, is an online social networking portal that facilitates offline group meetings in various locations around the world. Online education provider edX has over 40 Meetup communities around the world, while Udacity has 18. Nearly 220 other Meetups exist for categories like “MOOCs” and “online learning.” MOOC Meetups span the globe with concentrations in places like New York, London, Bangalore, and San Francisco and newer groups in Beijing and Hyderabad. These Meetups create a physical environment for learners to gather and engage with the content together; they are directed by the learners according to their needs. For example, a learner might create a study group Meetup for an Introductory Software as a Service course and schedule the meetings for every Sunday in Palo Alto; nine or so other learners from different backgrounds might attend regularly to ask questions, share ideas, and meet others who want to explore challenges related to the topic. It remains to be seen whether, lacking the formal structure or grade incentives of traditional education, these self-directed gatherings can fill the need for social learning among the broad learner population because they rely on the personal motivation and initiative of the individual, which may be less well-developed in some learner populations. As proponents of online learning have largely embraced the need for blended physical/virtual models, some providers may take a more active role in launching learning hubs that build community and provide physical space and opportunity for students and facilitators to interact.36

Social communities, combined with online content and resources such as the Meetups, are a step forward in providing social context for lifelong learning in non-traditional settings. The drawback with social communities is that some lack content or structures to use the community effectively as a mechanism for collaboration. The next step lies in creating communities of discovery where new content is created through collaboration. To some extent, this is emerging in shared workspaces, incubators, and accelerators that target specific technologies or skillsets, such as the various “hacker” spaces for making (tinkering), biohacking, and social/civic entrepreneurs.37

Innovation 3: Creation spaces

A real opportunity for learning institutions to amplify learning is to build deliberately constructed environments, “creation spaces,” that combine the advantages of tightly knit teams with the ability to involve an ever-increasing number of participants. This is where the “power of pull”—the ability to attract people and resources around a challenge or interest—comes in. Creation spaces are intended to bring learners together in the creation of new knowledge. Rather than focusing a discussion on content, learners within the creation space work together to create their own content and gain new insights, while the creation space connects individuals to a richer learning environment that encourages interactions. Creation spaces require three key ingredients: a critical mass of participants, the co-evolution of interactions within the team and with a broader set of participants, and an environment that supports various layers of activities.38

Looking back to the game World of Warcraft (WoW) and how it revolutionized gaming, one of the game’s enduring innovations was its ability to foster creation spaces. In WoW, performance is measured in terms of experience, while the degree of complexity and challenge increases with advancement through the game. WoW created a platform for learning where players innovated together and developed new knowledge. While the new knowledge pertained to advancing to new levels in the game, players across different backgrounds worked together to overcome new experiences and learn. Beyond these tightly knit teams or “guilds,” a rich learning platform evolved that helped participants in individual guilds to reach beyond their own teammates and learn from others through discussion forums, video archives, and communities of interest. What traditional learning institutions can learn from WoW is how to construct an environment that continually challenges its participants.

Innovation 4: Warranting

As education technology investments have increased, so have new ways to warrant the quality of learning beyond grades, certificates, and degrees. Traditionally, the validity of a learning experience was based on the credibility of the institution, as determined by nationally recognized accreditation agencies.39

In the emerging learner-centric landscape, learning is more utility-oriented than authority-based. With the recognition that even accurate college graduates are often not employed in their fields of study (if employed at all), and the widespread sentiment of employers that students are ill prepared for the demands of the workforce, the grade or degree as a symbol or accurate assessment of achievement is losing ground. Instead, innovators are experimenting with portfolio-based models that allow learners to incorporate learning and mastery from informal and non-textbook, non-classroom experiences. For example, learners using the Mozilla Development Network can be recognized for skills they learn both offline and online, and beyond their time at a formal learning institution. From Purdue University with its Passport badging platform to Mozilla with its Open Badge platform, the spectrum of what warranted learning looks like is expanding; so, too, are the people and organizations that can warrant learning. For example, corporations, new online accreditation organizations (such as Degreed and Accredible)40 and individuals themselves can now carry weight in validating learning experiences.

While badging has served as an innovative solution for capturing more skill-based learning, the impact that it will have on traditional learning institutions is unclear. According to Peter Stokes, executive director of postsecondary innovation in the College of Professional Studies at Northeastern University, one of the biggest challenges will be the normalization of badging, or the ability to create a learning currency.41While the adoption and recognition of badging by higher education is important, the greater impact will be felt as companies start recognizing and even issuing or accrediting badges. In addition, if companies start investing in building their own badges, it begins to change the relationship between corporate HR and the academy, shifting power away from the academy.

Case Study: UC Davis badging and skills qualification 42

In 2013, the University of California, Davis (UC Davis) launched digital badging within the sustainable agriculture program. The introduction of the badging system, called “Skills Qualifications,” was spearheaded by the department chair Gregory Pasternack and learning coordinator Joanna Normoyle in an attempt to bridge the gap between the theoretical knowledge taught by professors and the practical knowledge learned through the real application of theory. The badging system helped deliver the informal learning that students felt the current curriculum was not capturing. The badging system at UC Davis became the first step to creating an education portfolio for its students illustrative of projects and experiences tied to core competencies needed to excel in a particular profession. While the badges are not intended to replace grades, they are intended to make education more transparent and allow students to take more control of their learning careers.

THE FUTURE LEARNING LANDSCAPE

With barriers to entry and commercialization diminishing and an array of new entrants challenging traditional forms and institutions with innovations to make learning more accessible, flexible, and personalized, what are the implications for existing institutions, from higher education to educational publishing to corporate training?

The education/learning landscape is simultaneously becoming both fragmented and concentrated. Figure 4 shows the emerging landscape of unorthodox providers at the edges. Concentration will exist in the functions that operate on scale and scope, particularly with aggregation platforms, whereas fragmentation will exist within the content creation space as warranting and accrediting content becomes easier.

Fragmentation in content creation

The establishment of informal and more formal learning aggregation platforms (Udacity, EdX, Khan Academy, Udemy, and even YouTube) has led to an explosion of content creators. Online service tools (such as SchoolKeep, Fedora, and Skilljar) provide guidance to instructors on how to create their own online learning videos, lowering the costs of producing and distributing content to serve diverse and highly specific learning needs. Combined with more liberalized warranting, the pool of content creators will likely continue to increase beyond those with a professional degree and institutional affiliation.

For example, over half of Udacity’s courses are created by people who aren’t traditional professors but are experienced industry leaders.44 With 4,000-plus independent content creators, Udemy maintains an open platform, meaning that anyone regardless of credentials can log on and create a course available to all its users, including such courses as Java for Complete Beginners, created by software development trainer John Purcell with 209,000 enrolled students, or Become a Startup Founder, created by the Founder Institute with more than 600 enrolled students. According to Dan Chou, director of business development at Udemy, the courses offered on the platform are filtered for quality as determined by the learners themselves. The best-rated courses appear at the front of search queries, and others drop to the bottom.45

Meanwhile, other emerging providers offer “white label” and hosted solutions rather than a marketplace model. Companies such as SchoolKeep, Fedora, and Skilljar make it easy for individuals to build and operate courses at their own Web domain,46 resulting in a blurring of the line between education and e-commerce. Online service tools enable individual instructors of all backgrounds to not just build great lectures but also develop a sales funnel for the product that is independently owned by the content creator.

As fragmentation continues in the content creation space, the individual has more opportunities to continue learning beyond a traditional school setting across an increased array of subjects with timely and updated content. Technology and the liberalization of warranting content allows business to move from traditional teacher-centered models to new models that shift the current focus on the transfer of expert-generated knowledge toward scalable learning.

Concentration in learning content aggregation

Investments in education technology have financed the creation of online learning platforms, which in turn have opened the doors for all types of individuals to create, distribute, and share learning content. YouTube can be thought of as an early-stage learning aggregation platform. Anyone can learn almost anything on YouTube because it has lowered the barriers of entry for anyone to easily upload, organize, and distribute content on the Internet for free. While YouTube may not have the same sophistication in warranting its content as MOOCs, its equivalent measure of relevancy can be seen through the number of likes, views, and real-time comments a video receives.

Rather than trying to provide all content to all people, learning aggregation platforms are beginning to carve out niches in the market, shedding unnecessary costs and better differentiating themselves from their peers. The learning content aggregation platforms that support fragmented content creators will become concentrated, as any given end user’s participation on many platforms delivers little value and carries high convenience and attention costs, if not financial.

Already, the prominent names related to MOOCs each serve a particular genre and learning type (figure 5). Udacity provides STEM content and mostly targets computer programmers and engineers; NovoEd provides entrepreneurial content, mostly to individuals starting businesses; and Khan Academy mostly targets those who seek competency mastery through practicing problems.

The way some learning content aggregation platforms have gone about partnering with corporations is targeted and reflective of the genre in which they serve. In 2013, Udacity formed the Open Education Alliance by partnering with Google, AT&T, Nvidia, and Intuit to create courses that would help bridge the technology skills gap in today’s workforce, moving away from direct partnerships with universities.47 While the real effectiveness of these courses is still to be measured, by partnering with leading tech companies, Udacity is able to brand itself as the learning content aggregation platform for STEM topics.

Much as Napster was not the final word in the music industry, these learning aggregation platforms are not the end-all solution to innovation in learning. However, they can be the catalyst for change aligned with supporting lifelong learning. While MOOCs have reported low average completion rates of around 7 percent, completion may not be the definitive success metric of this new format, as learners may dip into courses for a specific purpose or content that may not require completion. Success for an aggregation platform might be better measured by a net promoter score (the likelihood of a learner recommending the course to someone else) or even a retention score (the likelihood of a learner returning for another course). While only 23 percent of academic leaders believe MOOCs to be a sustainable method of education, their value comes from opening the learning ecosystem to a broader set of creators, distributors, and learners in support of continuous learning.48

Mobilizers and learning agents

Aggregation, of course, doesn’t provide the support or social and experiential environment that accelerates learning. Aggregation is also not the same as skillfully sequencing courses within a collection, or across collections, to resemble a coherent curriculum. This is where mobilizers and agents come in.

Lifelong learners seek coursework not just to learn but to Boost their performance, and that type of learning comes from moving beyond hearing and studying to doing—alone and as a member of a group. To get better and faster requires the support of a broad set of resources and platforms that enable people to come together to create and absorb knowledge. MOOCs and other early technology offerings generally aren’t designed to facilitate individuals coming together with a goal of dramatically improving performance, something that traditional learning institutions are better able to provide within the existing physical infrastructure for collaboration.

But with the help of emerging mobilizers (players focused on orchestrating collaboration and learning within the ecosystem), first steps have been taken to foster the coming together. By partnering with Meetup, for example, online content aggregators can create an initial environment for the individual learner to connect with other students and engage with the content, share feedback, ask questions, and, hopefully, create sustained relationships.

Some traditional institutions for learning, such as Arizona State University (ASU), have realized the power of mobilizers such as TechShop as a means of facilitating collaboration among not just students, but a diverse array of community members and corporate partners. In 2013, ASU, the US public university with the highest enrollment, partnered with TechShop, a membership-based, do-it-yourself workshop and fabrication studio and coworking space, to provide all the 60,000-plus ASU students with free access to a wide range of machinery and tools. According to Mitzi Montaya, dean of ASU’s College of Technology and Innovation, TechShop has enriched students’ learning experience.49 TechShop allows students to apply knowledge they have learned in projects that are meaningful to them, regardless of major or coursework.

As fragmentation leads to a proliferation of information and content options through learning aggregation platforms, and lower barriers and unmet needs attract an ever-richer array of learning options, individuals will likely need help navigating not just MOOCs and digital resources, but the whole ecosystem of learning. The role of the agent, an entity that thoroughly understands the individual’s learning and career goals, becomes increasingly important. Britney Van Valkenburg, passionate about programming, sought online courses to learn how to code, but she found it difficult to navigate a career path in programming because of all the content that existed. What courses should she take, and in what order? What communities should she engage with, and where could she learn fastest? Should she enroll in a degree program or join a hackerspace? The role of the agent is to provide holistic career coaching that is personalized to the individual based on a deep understanding of his or her needs, skills, and goals. More and more, individuals are seeking out such agents; in fact, the life coaching industry grew to a $2 billion industry in 2013.50 A pure-play agent is brand-agnostic, anticipates individual needs with proactive recommendations, and is widely accessible, whether in person or virtually. A scalable, widely accessible, and affordable type of agent is still very much nascent, although companies such as Eddefy are trying to create a scalable solution for navigating a learning path, and LinkedIn also fulfills some of the goals of an agent.

ENTRANTS FROM THE EDGES GAINING CREDIBILITY

As the business environment becomes more globalized and automated, and individuals begin to recognize that a four-year degree is neither an automatic ticket to employment nor the last milestone in their learning careers, more individuals are traveling alternative learning pathways (figure 6).

This expanding ecosystem of semi-structured learning fits the model of how learners—or at least a certain type of learner—want to proceed through their learning. The mobilizer serves as a spark or catalyst. This has so far been observed in the programming space but may prove relevant across other domains. Between Meetups, social learning spaces such as Hacker Dojo and TechShop, and on-demand resources such as Codeacademy and GitHub, individuals are exposed to some skills, ideas, and foundational concepts. This initial exposure sparks an interest, which leads the individual to look for opportunities to apply or experience skills in context, and to engage with a community of others pursuing similar interests. At this point, the desire to go deeper and achieve mastery often leads to a need for a more structured setting, a physical presence, guidance, and a coherent curriculum. This is where the emerging, short-term, immersive institutions come in, whether it is the nine-week Dev Bootcamp for coders or entrepreneurial schools such as the new Draper University.

Specialized, short-term, intensive programs such as Draper University, Hack Reactor, Codeacademy, and Dev Bootcamp, while still at the edges and currently confined to entrepreneurship and programming, have gained significant traction with individuals and companies. Coding boot camps alone are poised to reap $59 million in tuition in 2014. The number of graduates from these specialized intensive programs, or vocational schools, has also grown by 175 percent in the past year.51 In fact, across the existing coding boot camps, 75 percent of graduates report working full time in a job that requires the skills taught in the curriculum, compared with the 5 percent who were working as full-time programmers beforehand.52

While these programs are not intended to replace the four-year institution or the community college for now, they are intended to close the gap between what academia teaches and what modern jobs require. The average computer science major may not graduate with enough coding- or workplace-specific skills to be a professional coder, resulting in an unemployment rate of around 9 percent in 2013 for accurate college graduates with computer science degrees.53 These boot camps aim to bridge that deficiency by providing an intensive project-based curriculum relevant to the work environment. Dev Bootcamp touts a 90 percent placement rate for its students at top-tier companies such as Facebook, Pinterest, and Google; Hack Reactor reports 100 percent job placement, saying all of its alumni are software engineers with salaries of over $100,000.54 Dave Hoover, cofounder of Dev Bootcamp, agrees that a nine-week intensive program cannot compete with a four-year immersive higher education institution, but it can serve as an alternative pathway in an à la carte model of learning. A student, no matter what age, could attend these intensive boot camps within different disciplines and find work opportunities to apply that knowledge.55

Experience Institute (Ei) and Draper University are two other emerging institutions that are repositioning what a traditional learning institution’s structure could look like. Instead of restricting students to the classroom, Ei immerses them in at least three three-month internships at different companies over the course of a year. In between apprenticeships, the students come together as a community to participate in live classes and share and reflect on their experiences. And at Draper University, an intensive entrepreneurship boot camp, students are able to more quickly gain exposure to relevant and new experiences within venture capital than through a four-year institution. This is why aspiring entrepreneur JC Xu decided to apply to Draper University rather than attending another graduate program.56 Consider also the success of alternative institutions such as Singularity University and the Minerva Schools at KGI,57 both of which adopt a global perspective and focus on creating intense, immersive environments for collaboration and learning. Each is able to be highly selective and charge premium rates for its unique learning offerings, competing with traditional programs in ways that MOOCs cannot. In the case of Singularity and other short-term intensive programs, the network is a critical selling point. These influential networks of financiers, employers, and collaborators, as well as the program’s own active alumni, compete directly with the alumni networks of traditional institutions, one of their historical advantages.

BUILD YOUR OWN FUTURE

The emerging ecosystem of learning tools and providers is ripe with opportunities for both individuals and institutions. But as new entrants gain traction at the edges, they will increasingly threaten components of the traditional learning structure. Traditional institutions must be open to opportunities to leverage and integrate this new learning ecosystem and identify the most appropriate and sustainable roles to play in the new landscape. Individuals have both the need and the capabilities to navigate and benefit from new offerings. Meanwhile, higher education institutions have been hearing about MOOCs and other models for the past several years, yet the threats have not materialized as quickly as some predicted. This makes it that much harder for institutions to understand the future landscape and take action in the face of deep structural obstacles.

Despite having vast physical and human resources that dwarf those of any new entrant, traditional institutions should think of themselves as operating within the broader context of the learning ecosystem. They operate in a world that is more globalized, automated, and networked, where both consumers and providers have greater reach and more options, and where continuous learning will be a fixture of our professional and personal lives. Individuals’ success in learning will depend increasingly on their ability and motivation to navigate a myriad of options to create a personalized, relevant learning pathway. Relevant players in the future learning landscape will need to address not only how they can better help individuals learn faster, but also how they can help them unlearn and be open to truly new ideas. As psychologist Herbert Gerjuoy’s quote in Future Shock is commonly paraphrased, “The illterate of the 21st century will not be those who cannot read and write, but those who cannot learn, unlearn, and relearn.”58

We tend to underplay the difficulty of unlearning to make way for new learning, but unlearning is unlikely to happen in a classroom where the same push-based methods of delivering content have been in use for the past century. What types of immersive experiences can help an individual adopt a new lens or change his or her frame of reference? What social support is needed to look at things differently, even at the risk of looking uneducated, along the way to learning? What does it take to get an individual, or an entire organization, out of the comfort zone?

The educational institutions that succeed and remain relevant in the future business landscape will likely be those that foster a learning environment that reflects the networked ecosystem and is meaningful and relevant to the lifelong learner. This means providing learning opportunities that match the learner’s current development and stage of life. In community colleges, we see more experiments in “stackable” credentials that provide short-term skills and employment value while enabling students to return over time and assemble a coherent curriculum that helps them progress toward career and personal goals. Similarly, corporations such as Siemens have worked with high schools and community colleges to create apprenticeship programs that yield immediate skills and employment for young or reentering learners who might lack the resources to effectively benefit from the learning ecosystem. For both vocational and academic education, there is greater recognition of the need for personalized pacing, modularity, and structures to provide continuity across time.

Some universities have started to look at the examples coming from both the edges of education and areas such as gaming and media to imagine and conduct experiments in what that future learning environment could look like:

  • ASU has ventured into more experiential, community-oriented, self-directed learning and has leveraged the energy and learning potential of the maker movement59 in its partnership with TechShop Chandler.
  • Georgetown University, through a series of workshops led by Ann Pendleton-Jullian, director of the Knowlton School of Architecture at Ohio State University, has challenged the organizational and physical boundaries of a campus to reimagine the higher education model of 2033 as a locus for communities of practice.60
  • Stanford Design School’s 2025 project reimagines the university experience, focusing on experiential learning and examining the value derived from residential learning and colocation with peers.61

In traditional educational institutions, structural and organizational inertia can hinder thinking about how to offer and support learning in new ways. The requirements of state and federal funding programs, typical fund-accounting models, incentives, hierarchies, and even reputation mechanisms derived from publishing and classroom authority can all stand in the way of traditional educational institutions making the changes needed to remain relevant and sustainable in the context of the future business landscape.

Looking ahead: What can institutions do?

As we have shown above, learning and higher education, while related, are not necessarily following the same trajectory. Learning is evolving rapidly, while the typical institution for postsecondary education is changing more slowly. Traditional institutions and providers that are considering their position in the emerging landscape should adopt a mindset that allows them to see past the obstacles and the “way it’s always been done” to adopt a realistic and optimistic perspective.

Adopt a new mindset

  • Change your lens: The pressures institutions are facing also hold the opportunity for making significant changes according to their individual contexts. Rather than focusing on the problem—budget constraints, unsupportive faculty, poor technological infrastructure—or replicating the shiny emerging tool that others are using (such as MOOCs), focus on identifying the learning mechanisms that work within the context of your institution and are meaningful to tomorrow’s learner.
  • Move from static to fluid: In a networked world that is rapidly changing, static knowledge stocks delivered at a fixed point in time will be less valuable than knowledge flows created as individuals continually refresh what they learn through experience beyond the four walls of a classroom. Learning institutions have the unique opportunity to enable a physical space and opportunity for tacit knowledge sharing—the knowledge that resides in our heads and cannot easily be codified—which taps into the rich and changing ecosystem around them.
  • Identify your competitive strengths: The value of the university, community college, or vocational college is in its ability to function as a community of practice around knowledge. The higher education experience is unique in its ability to surround the learner with a network of individuals from different backgrounds—leverage that. As Pendleton-Jullian suggests, probe deeper into what value the university experience brings that cannot be replicated or virtualized, and identify the specific factors (people, programs, disciplines, and context) compared with other forms of learning that make your institution unique and relevant to the lifelong learner.
  • Scale the edges: Antibodies to change and innovation will exist and may stem from misaligned faculty support, lack of a strong technological infrastructure, or lack of funding transparency. Innovation can exist at the edges of every organization, whether in a particular department, set of students, or physical location. Focus on these areas where change is blossoming rather than despair about the immovable core, and leverage external resources from the surrounding ecosystem of tools and organizations for support rather than seeking internal funding and approval. Identify initiatives that are both aligned with your strengths and with agents of change within the organization. Edges can become conduits of transformation, helping the institutions of today tap into the opportunities of tomorrow.

Identify a sustainable role

Today, learning institutions have the unique opportunity to transform the learning environment (physically, virtually, and socially) into a new ecosystem that supports the currently unmet need of lifelong learning. Traditional learning institutions—universities, community colleges, and vocational schools—will need to understand what roles they currently play, where they want to be, and what assets they can leverage to stay relevant in the context of moving from knowledge stocks to flows, identifying dynamic factors, and scaling the edges. With concentration around the scale and scope roles mapped in figure 4 (infrastructure provider, aggregation platform, and agent business), fragmentation with content creation, and mobilizers as the connective tissues between the fragmented and consolidated players, traditional postsecondary institutions have a choice:

  • Transform into an infrastructure business. Focus on providing the facilities and locations for a variety of learning experiences. As an infrastructure provider, traditional institutions shed the roles that are not core to providing facilities and learning infrastructure. This helps transform the institution into a recognized space for learning where content can be brought in or accessed from external sources, but students look to the institution to connect with a broader pool of individuals for the purpose of collaborative and social learning. While in this context, the institution amplifies the value of its physical infrastructure. Back-end systems and delivery and warranting systems are also forms of infrastructure that will be valuable in the future. It is more likely that these types of infrastructure will be provided by new entrants, so existing institutions should be realistic about where they can compete sustainably and leverage other providers for the roles they don’t play best.
  • Become a platform business and curator. Aggregate resources for knowledge and connect them with appropriate learners rather than act as the vendor of knowledge. As a platform business, institutions become the entities that now pull knowledge from the broader ecosystem to share with learners, rather than holding tightly to the content that is their own. This helps enable the institution to access the most relevant and current knowledge content from an ecosystem of content creation that extends beyond the institution. In the process of becoming a platform business, institutions have the ability to also curate content. Top universities such as Harvard University, University of California, Berkeley, or Massachusetts Institute of Technology can use their current brands to curate quality content. In this case, the institution acts as a platform to identify relevant content in the networked ecosystem.
  • Become an agent business. Channel your sector experience to provide lifetime guidance for the learner on his or her learning and career. As an agent business, an institution would help learners navigate a world of exponential change and abundance of information. As a talent agent for the student, the institution would commit to this role for the student throughout his or her career in the pursuit of lifelong learning.

Some traditional learning institutions are already thinking about the new roles they can play. In the Stanford 2025 project, one of the four proposed models of innovation was the Open Loop University. Through Open Loop, students can attend university through a six-year nonlinear timeline, allowing them to learn, work, and return to learn again. Axis Flip is another model that will rework the infrastructure of the university to center around learning hubs, a model most closely tied to the role of the institution as an infrastructure provider for collaborative learning.62

Whatever role they play, institutions will also have to connect and collaborate with mobilizers in order to unlock the collective knowledge of the ecosystem and become part of the transformation. The learning landscape is changing, and traditional institutions and new entrants have the opportunity to participate in and define a rich learning ecosystem that is more personalized and fluid than education has been for at least a century. Institutions will need to decide where to compete and where to cede the floor, but those that succeed will find ways to remain relevant, embrace the forces shifting the broader global environment, and begin building their own futures now, before it gets harder to claim a meaningful space in this emerging landscape.

Institutions of higher education face ongoing challenges, including skyrocketing costs, intense competition, increased government regulation coupled with less public funding, and an unpredictable economy. Reengineered business processes that align personnel activities with institutional goals and strategies—supported by selected IT—can help organizations reduce costs while creating innovative services that help attract and retain quality students, faculty, and staff. Deloitte serves over 200 higher education clients, drawing upon a pool of multidisciplinary sources across consulting, financial advisory, tax, and audit. Learn more at www.deloitte.com/highereducation.

As used in this document, “Deloitte” means Deloitte & Touche LLP, Deloitte Tax LLP, Deloitte Financial Advisory Services LLP, and Deloitte Consulting LLP, subsidiaries of Deloitte LLP. Please see www.deloitte.com/us/about for a detailed description of the legal structure of Deloitte LLP and its subsidiaries.

ABOUT THE AUTHORS

John Hagel

John Hagel (co-chairman, Deloitte Center for the Edge), of Deloitte Consulting LLP, has nearly 30 years of experience as a management consultant, author, speaker, and entrepreneur, and has helped companies Boost performance by applying technology to reshape business strategies. In addition to holding significant positions at leading consulting firms and companies throughout his career, Hagel is the author of bestselling business books such as Net Gain, Net Worth, Out of the Box, The Only Sustainable Edge, and The Power of Pull.

John Seely Brown

John Seely Brown (JSB) (independent co-chairman, Deloitte Center for the Edge) is a prolific writer, speaker, and educator. In addition to his work with the Center for the Edge, JSB is adviser to the provost and a visiting scholar at the University of Southern California. This position followed a lengthy tenure at Xerox Corporation, where JSB was chief scientist and director of the Xerox Palo Alto Research Center. JSB has published more than 100 papers in scientific journals and authored or co-authored seven books, including The Social Life of Information, The Only Sustainable Edge, The Power of Pull, and A New Culture of Learning.

Roy Mathew

Roy Mathew (principal, Deloitte Consulting LLP) specializes in IT strategy, transformation, and restructuring to help higher education clients develop innovative services and reduce costs. Roy focuses on helping universities with major transformation and efficiency efforts that include significant process, organization, and governance change. Most recently, he led the shared services operational excellence program at one of the largest and most eminent public universities in California. He is actively involved in developing Deloitte’s capabilities and eminence in innovation, business process reengineering, and operational performance improvement.

Maggie Wooll

Maggie Wooll (senior editor and engagement strategist, Deloitte Center for the Edge), of Deloitte Services LP, combines her experience advising large organizations on strategy and operations with her love of storytelling to share the Center’s research. At the Center, she explores the implications of rapidly changing technologies for individuals and their institutions. In particular, she is interested in learning and personal fulfillment within the shifting business environment.

Wendy Tsu

Wendy Tsu (former research fellow, Deloitte Center for the Edge) is passionate about exploring the edges between learning, social impact, and innovation. As part of Deloitte Consulting LLP’s Strategy & Operations practice, her focus has been in technology and education. Most recently, she has been helping higher education institutions reimagine their operating models. As part of the Center, she conducted research and analysis related to new forms and institutions of education and how they impact the educational journey for the lifelong learner.

Originally published by Deloitte University Press on dupress.com. Copyright 2015 Deloitte Development LLC.

Thu, 26 May 2022 07:59:00 -0500 text/html https://www.theatlantic.com/sponsored/deloitte-shifts/the-lifetime-learner/256/
Killexams : EdTech and Smart Classrooms Market Analysis by Size, Share, Key Players, Growth, Trends & Forecast 2027
EdTech and Smart Classrooms Market Analysis by Size, Share, Key Players, Growth, Trends & Forecast 2027

“Apple (US), Cisco (US), Blackboard (US), IBM (US), Dell EMC (US),Google (US), Microsoft (US), Oracle(US),SAP (Germany), Instructure(US).”

EdTech and Smart Classrooms Market by Hardware (Interactive Displays, Interactive Projectors), Education System Solution (LMS, TMS, DMS, SRS, Test Preparation, Learning & Gamification), Deployment Type, End User and Region – Global Forecast to 2027

MarketsandMarkets forecasts the global EdTech and Smart Classrooms Market to grow from USD 125.3 billion in 2022 to USD 232.9  billion by 2027, at a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 13.2% during the forecast period. The major factors driving the growth of the EdTech and smart classrooms market include increasing penetration of mobile devices and easy availability of internet, and growing demand for online teaching-learning models, impact of COVID-19 pandemic and growing need for EdTech solutions to keep education system running.

Download PDF Brochure: https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/pdfdownloadNew.asp?id=1066

Interactive Displays segment to hold the highest market size during the forecast period

Interactive displays helps to collaborate teaching with tech boost social learning. As per a study it has been discovered that frequent group activity in classrooms, often aided by technology, can result in 20% higher levels of social-emotional skill development. Students in these classes are also 13% more likely to feel confident contributing to class discussions. Interactive display encourages the real time collaboration. SMART Boards facilitate the necessary collaboration for students to develop these skills. Creating an audience response system on the interactive display allows students to use devices to participate in class surveys, quizzes, and games, and then analyse the results in real time. A large interactive whiteboard (IWB), also known as an interactive board or a smart board, is a large interactive display board in the shape of a whiteboard. It can be a standalone touchscreen computer used to perform tasks and operations on its own, or it can be a connectable apparatus used as a touchpad to control computers from a projector. They are used in a variety of settings, such as classrooms at all levels of education, corporate board rooms and work groups, professional sports coaching training rooms, broadcasting studios, and others.

Cloud deployment type to record the fastest growth rate during the forecast period

Technology innovation has provided numerous alternative solutions for businesses of all sizes to operate more efficiently. Cloud has emerged as a new trend in data centre administration. The cloud eliminates the costs of purchasing software and hardware, setting up and running data centres, such as electricity expenses for power and cooling of servers, and high-skilled IT resources for infrastructure management. Cloud services are available on demand and can be configured by a single person in a matter of minutes. Cloud provides dependability by storing multiple copies of data on different servers. The cloud is a potential technological creation that fosters change for its users. Cloud computing is an information technology paradigm that delivers computing services via the Internet by utilizing remote servers, database systems, networking, analytics, storage systems, software, and other digital facilities. Cloud computing has significant benefits for higher education, particularly for students transitioning from K-12 to university. Teachers can easily deliver online classes and engage their students in various programs and online projects by utilizing cloud technology in education. Cloud-based deployment refers to the hosted-type deployment of the game-based learning solution. There has been an upward trend in the deployment of the EdTech solution via cloud or dedicated data center infrastructure. The advantages of hosted deployment include reduced physical infrastructure, lower maintenance costs, 24×7 accessibility, and effective analysis of electronic business content. The cloud-based deployment of EdTech solution is crucial as it offers a flexible and scalable infrastructure to handle multiple devices and analyze ideas from employees, customers, and partners.

Request demo Pages: https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/requestsampleNew.asp?id=1066

Major EdTech and smart classrooms vendors include Apple (US), Cisco (US),  Blackboard (US), IBM (US), Dell EMC (US), Google (US), Microsoft (US), Oracle(US), SAP (Germany), Instructure(US). These market players have adopted various growth strategies, such as partnerships, agreements, and collaborations, and new product enhancements to expand their presence in the EdTech and smart classrooms market. Product enhancements and collaborations have been the most adopted strategies by major players from 2018 to 2020, which helped companies innovate their offerings and broaden their customer base.

A prominent player in the EdTech and smart classrooms market, Apple focuses on inorganic growth strategies such as partnerships, collaborations, and acquisitions. For instance, in August 2021 Apple launched Mobile Student ID through which students will be able to navigate campus and make purchases using mobile student IDs on the iPhone and Apple Watch. In July 2020 Apple partnered with HBCUs to offer innovative opportunities for coding to communities across the US. Apple deepened the partnership with an additional 10 HBCUs regional coding centers under its Community Education Initiative. The main objective of this partnership is to bring coding, creativity, and workforce development opportunities to learners of all ages. Apple offers software as well as hardware to empower educators with powerful products and tools. Apple offers several applications for K-12 education, including Schoolwork and Classroom. The company also offers AR in education to provide a better learning experience. Teaching tools helps to simplify teaching tasks with apps that make the classroom more flexible, collaborative, and personalized for each student. Apple has interactive guide that makes it easy to stay on task and organized while teaching remotely with iPad. The learning apps helps to manage schedules and screen time to minimize the distractions and also helps to create productive learning environments and make device set up easy for teachers and parents. Apple has various products, such as Macintosh, iPhone, iPad, wearables, and services. It has an intelligent software assistant named Siri, which has cloud-synchronized data with iCloud.

Blackboard has a vast product portfolio with diverse offerings across four divisions: K-12, higher education, government, and business. Under the K-12 division, the company offers products such as LMS, Synchronous Collaborative Learning, Learning Object Repository, Web Community Manager, Mass Notifications, Mobile Communications Application, Teacher Communication, Social Media Manager, and Blackboard Ally. Its solutions include Blackboard Classroom, Collaborate Starter, and Personalized Learning. Blackboard’s higher education division products include Blackboard Learn, Blackboard Collaborate, Analytics for Learn, Blackboard Intelligence, Blackboard Predict, Outcomes and Assessments, X-ray for Learning Analytics, Blackboard Connect, Blackboard Instructor, Moodlerooms, Blackboard Transact, Blackboard Ally, and Blackboard Open Content. The company also provides services, such as student pathway services, marketing, and recruiting, help desk services, enrollment management, financial aid and student services, engagement campaigns, student retention, training and implementation services, strategic consulting, and analytics consulting services. Its teaching and learning solutions include LMS, education analytics, web conferencing, mobile learning, open-source learning, training and implementation, virtual classroom, and competency-based education. Blackboard also offers campus enablement solutions such as payment solutions, security solutions, campus store solutions, and transaction solutions. Under the government division, it offers solutions such as LMS, registration and reporting, accessibility, collaboration and web conferencing, mass notifications and implementation, and strategic consulting. The company has launched Blackboard Unite on April 2020 for K-12. This solution compromises a virtual classroom, learning management system, accessibility tool, mobile app, and services and implementation kit to help emote learning efforts.

Media Contact
Company Name: MarketsandMarkets™ Research Private Ltd.
Contact Person: Mr. Aashish Mehra
Email: Send Email
Phone: 18886006441
Address:630 Dundee Road Suite 430
City: Northbrook
State: IL 60062
Country: United States
Website: https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/Market-Reports/educational-technology-ed-tech-market-1066.html

Fri, 22 Jul 2022 11:15:00 -0500 GetNews en-US text/html https://www.digitaljournal.com/pr/edtech-and-smart-classrooms-market-analysis-by-size-share-key-players-growth-trends-forecast-2027
Killexams : Free Whitepaper: Strategies for training delivery

A thriving workforce culture is one where employees continue to grow beyond their career path and are empowered through skills developed on their employee journey.

Learning and development don’t happen overnight. They require persistent cultivation, strategic engagement initiatives, and a learning platform—one that engages, supports the immediate application of new skills and creates a strong business impact.

Download this free whitepaper from SAP Litmos to better understand the current state of professional training and gain useful strategies that will engage your workforce and build future talent.

Gain insight into engaging modern learners through:

  • Analyzing learner profiles and effective training measures
  • Practical use of training delivery methods
  • Implementing the best fit method of learning

Complete the form and secure your free copy today.

Tue, 11 Aug 2020 03:09:00 -0500 en text/html https://www.hcamag.com/au/white-papers/free-whitepaper-strategies-for-training-delivery/224868
Killexams : E-learning in Business Market Is Set to Fly High in Years to Come with Top Countries Data | Exclusive Report Spread Across 109 Pages

The MarketWatch News Department was not involved in the creation of this content.

Jul 21, 2022 (The Expresswire) -- [109 Report Pages] "E-learning in Business Market" Insights 2022 By Types (E-commerce, Marketing, Accounting, Business Management), By Applications (Primary School Learner, High School Learner, College Learners), By Segmentation analysis, Regions and Forecast to 2029. The Global E-learning in Business market Report provides In-depth analysis on the market status of the E-learning in Business Top manufacturers with best facts and figures, meaning, Definition, SWOT analysis, PESTAL analysis, expert opinions and the latest developments across the globe., the E-learning in Business Market Report contains Full TOC, Tables and Figures, and Chart with Key Analysis, Pre and Post COVID-19 Market Outbreak Impact Analysis and Situation by Regions.

E-learning in Business Market Research Report is spread across 109 Pages and provides exclusive data, information, vital statistics, trends, and competitive landscape details in this niche sector.

The E-learning in Business market has witnessed growth from Million USD to Multi million USD from 2017 to 2022. With the magnificent CAGR, this market is estimated to reach Multimillion USD in 2029.

The report focuses on the E-learning in Business market size, segment size (mainly covering product type, application, and geography), competitor landscape, accurate status, and development trends. Furthermore, the report provides detailed cost analysis, supply chain.

Technological innovation and advancement will further optimize the performance of the product, making it more widely used in downstream applications. Moreover, Consumer behavior analysis and market dynamics (drivers, restraints, opportunities) provides crucial information for knowing the E-learning in Business market.

The Global E-learning in Business market is anticipated to rise at a considerable rate during the forecast period, between 2022 and 2029. In 2021, the market is growing at a steady rate and with the rising adoption of strategies by key players, the market is expected to rise over the projected horizon.

Final Report will add the analysis of the impact of COVID-19 on this industry.

TO KNOW HOW COVID-19 PANDEMIC AND RUSSIA UKRAINE WAR WILL IMPACT THIS MARKET - REQUEST SAMPLE

Moreover, it helps new businesses perform a positive assessment of their business plans because it covers a range of courses market participants must be aware of to remain competitive.

E-learning in Business Market Report identifies various key players in the market and sheds light on their strategies and collaborations to combat competition. The comprehensive report provides a two-dimensional picture of the market. By knowing the global revenue of manufacturers, the global price of manufacturers, and the production by manufacturers during the forecast period of 2022 to 2029, the reader can identify the footprints of manufacturers in the E-learning in Business industry.

Get a demo PDF of report -https://www.360researchreports.com/enquiry/request-sample/20765874

E-learning in Business Market - Competitive and Segmentation Analysis:

As well as providing an overview of successful marketing strategies, market contributions, and accurate developments of leading companies, the report also offers a dashboard overview of leading companies' past and present performance. Several methodologies and analyses are used in the research report to provide in-depth and accurate information about the E-learning in Business Market.

The Major players covered in the E-learning in Business market report are:

● Tata Interactive Systems
● Skill Soft
● SAP
● Adobe systems Inc
● Apollo Education Group Inc.
● Blackboard Inc
● Aptara
● McGrawHill
● Citrix
● Articulate
● HealthStream Inc
● Desire2Learn
● Cisco Systems
● N2N Services
● Oracle
● Saba Software
● Microsoft

The current market dossier provides market growth potential, opportunities, drivers, industry-specific challenges and risks market share along with the growth rate of the global E-learning in Business market. The report also covers monetary and exchange fluctuations, import-export trade, and global market

status in a smooth-tongued pattern. The SWOT analysis, compiled by industry experts, Industry Concentration Ratio and the latest developments for the global E-learning in Business market share are covered in a statistical way in the form of tables and figures including graphs and charts for easy understanding.

Get a demo Copy of the E-learning in Business Market Report 2022

A thorough evaluation of the restrains included in the report portrays the contrast to drivers and gives room for strategic planning. Factors that overshadow the market growth are pivotal as they can be understood to devise different bends for getting hold of the lucrative opportunities that are present in the ever-growing market. Additionally, insights into market expert’s opinions have been taken to understand the market better.

Report further studies the market development status and future E-learning in Business Market trend across the world. Also, it splits E-learning in Business market Segmentation by Type and by Applications to fully and deeply research and reveal market profile and prospects.

On the basis of product type this report displays the production, revenue, price, market share and growth rate of each type, primarily split into:

● E-commerce
● Marketing
● Accounting
● Business Management
● Others

On the basis of the end users/applications this report focuses on the status and outlook for major applications/end users, consumption (sales), market share and growth rate for each application, including:

● Primary School Learner
● High School Learner
● College Learner
● Others

E-learning in Business Market - Regional Analysis:

Geographically, this report is segmented into several key regions, with sales, revenue, market share and growth Rate of E-learning in Business in these regions, from 2015 to 2029, covering

● North America (United States, Canada and Mexico) ● Europe (Germany, UK, France, Italy, Russia and Turkey etc.) ● Asia-Pacific (China, Japan, Korea, India, Australia, Indonesia, Thailand, Philippines, Malaysia and Vietnam) ● South America (Brazil, Argentina, Columbia etc.) ● Middle East and Africa (Saudi Arabia, UAE, Egypt, Nigeria and South Africa)

This E-learning in Business Market Research/Analysis Report Contains Answers to your following Questions

● Which Manufacturing Technology is used for E-learning in Business? What Developments Are Going On in That Technology? Which Trends Are Causing These Developments? ● Who Are the Global Key Players in This E-learning in Business Market? What are Their Company Profile, Their Product Information, and Contact Information? ● What Was Global Market Status of E-learning in Business Market? What Was Capacity, Production Value, Cost and PROFIT of E-learning in Business Market? ● What Is Current Market Status of E-learning in Business Industry? What’s Market Competition in This Industry, Both Company, and Country Wise? What’s Market Analysis of E-learning in Business Market by Taking Applications and Types in Consideration? ● What Are Projections of Global E-learning in Business Industry Considering Capacity, Production and Production Value? What Will Be the Estimation of Cost and Profit? What Will Be Market Share, Supply and Consumption? What about Import and Export? ● What Is E-learning in Business Market Chain Analysis by Upstream Raw Materials and Downstream Industry? ● What Is Economic Impact On E-learning in Business Industry? What are Global Macroeconomic Environment Analysis Results? What Are Global Macroeconomic Environment Development Trends? ● What Are Market Dynamics of E-learning in Business Market? What Are Challenges and Opportunities? ● What Should Be Entry Strategies, Countermeasures to Economic Impact, and Marketing Channels for E-learning in Business Industry?

Our research analysts will help you to get customized details for your report, which can be modified in terms of a specific region, application or any statistical details. In addition, we are always willing to comply with the study, which triangulated with your own data to make the market research more comprehensive in your perspective.

Inquire more and share questions if any before the purchase on this report at -https://www.360researchreports.com/enquiry/pre-order-enquiry/20765874

With tables and figures helping analyse worldwide Global E-learning in Business market trends, this research provides key statistics on the state of the industry and is a valuable source of guidance and direction for companies and individuals interested in the market.

Detailed TOC of Global E-learning in Business Market Research Report 2022

1 E-learning in Business Market Overview
1.1 Product Overview and Scope of E-learning in Business

1.2 E-learning in Business Segment by Type
1.2.1 Global E-learning in Business Sales and CAGR (%) Comparison by Type (2017-2029)
1.2.2 The Market Profile of E-learning in Business without Handle
1.2.3 The Market Profile of E-learning in Business with Handle

1.3 Global E-learning in Business Segment by Application
1.3.1 E-learning in Business Consumption (Sales) Comparison by Application (2017-2029)
1.3.2 The Market Profile of Commercial Use
1.3.3 The Market Profile of Personal Mobility

1.4 Global E-learning in Business Market, Region Wise (2017-2022)
1.4.1 Global E-learning in Business Market Size (Revenue) and CAGR (%) Comparison by Region (2017-2022)
1.4.2 United States E-learning in Business Market Status and Prospect (2017-2022)
1.4.3 Europe E-learning in Business Market Status and Prospect (2017-2022)
1.4.3.1 Germany E-learning in Business Market Status and Prospect (2017-2022)
1.4.3.2 UK E-learning in Business Market Status and Prospect (2017-2022)
1.4.3.3 France E-learning in Business Market Status and Prospect (2017-2022)
1.4.3.4 Italy E-learning in Business Market Status and Prospect (2017-2022)
1.4.3.5 Spain E-learning in Business Market Status and Prospect (2017-2022)
1.4.3.6 Russia E-learning in Business Market Status and Prospect (2017-2022)
1.4.3.7 Poland E-learning in Business Market Status and Prospect (2017-2022)
1.4.4 China E-learning in Business Market Status and Prospect (2017-2022)
1.4.5 Japan E-learning in Business Market Status and Prospect (2017-2022)
1.4.6 India E-learning in Business Market Status and Prospect (2017-2022)
1.4.7 Southeast Asia E-learning in Business Market Status and Prospect (2017-2022)
1.4.7.1 Malaysia E-learning in Business Market Status and Prospect (2017-2022)
1.4.7.2 Singapore E-learning in Business Market Status and Prospect (2017-2022)
1.4.7.3 Philippines E-learning in Business Market Status and Prospect (2017-2022)
1.4.7.4 Indonesia E-learning in Business Market Status and Prospect (2017-2022)
1.4.7.5 Thailand E-learning in Business Market Status and Prospect (2017-2022)
1.4.7.6 Vietnam E-learning in Business Market Status and Prospect (2017-2022)
1.4.8 Latin America E-learning in Business Market Status and Prospect (2017-2022)
1.4.8.1 Brazil E-learning in Business Market Status and Prospect (2017-2022)
1.4.8.2 Mexico E-learning in Business Market Status and Prospect (2017-2022)
1.4.8.3 Colombia E-learning in Business Market Status and Prospect (2017-2022)
1.4.9 Middle East and Africa E-learning in Business Market Status and Prospect (2017-2022)
1.4.9.1 Saudi Arabia E-learning in Business Market Status and Prospect (2017-2022)
1.4.9.2 United Arab Emirates E-learning in Business Market Status and Prospect (2017-2022)
1.4.9.3 Turkey E-learning in Business Market Status and Prospect (2017-2022)
1.4.9.4 Egypt E-learning in Business Market Status and Prospect (2017-2022)
1.4.9.5 South Africa E-learning in Business Market Status and Prospect (2017-2022)
1.4.9.6 Nigeria E-learning in Business Market Status and Prospect (2017-2022)

Get a demo Copy of the E-learning in Business Market Report 2022

1.5 Global Market Size of E-learning in Business (2017-2029)
1.5.1 Global E-learning in Business Revenue Status and Outlook (2017-2029)
1.5.2 Global E-learning in Business Sales Status and Outlook (2017-2029)

2 Global E-learning in Business Market Landscape by Player
2.1 Global E-learning in Business Sales and Share by Player (2017-2022)
2.2 Global E-learning in Business Revenue and Market Share by Player (2017-2022)
2.3 Global E-learning in Business Average Price by Player (2017-2022)
2.4 Global E-learning in Business Gross Margin by Player (2017-2022)
2.5 E-learning in Business Manufacturing Base Distribution, Sales Area and Product Type by Player
2.6 E-learning in Business Market Competitive Situation and Trends
2.6.1 E-learning in Business Market Concentration Rate
2.6.2 E-learning in Business Market Share of Top 3 and Top 6 Players
2.6.3 Mergers and Acquisitions, Expansion

3 E-learning in Business Upstream and Downstream Analysis
3.1 E-learning in Business Industrial Chain Analysis
3.2 Key Raw Materials Suppliers and Price Analysis
3.3 Key Raw Materials Supply and Demand Analysis
3.4 Manufacturing Process Analysis
3.5 Market Concentration Rate of Raw Materials
3.6 Downstream Buyers
3.7 Value Chain Status Under COVID-18

4 E-learning in Business Manufacturing Cost Analysis
4.1 Manufacturing Cost Structure Analysis
4.2 E-learning in Business Key Raw Materials Cost Analysis
4.2.1 Key Raw Materials Introduction
4.2.2 Price Trend of Key Raw Materials
4.3 Labor Cost Analysis
4.3.1 Labor Cost of E-learning in Business Under COVID-19
4.4 Energy Costs Analysis
4.5 RandD Costs Analysis

5 Market Dynamics
5.1 Drivers
5.2 Restraints and Challenges
5.3 Opportunities
5.3.1 Advances in Innovation and Technology for E-learning in Business
5.3.2 Increased Demand in Emerging Markets
5.4 E-learning in Business Industry Development Trends under COVID-19 Outbreak
5.4.1 Global COVID-19 Status Overview
5.4.2 Influence of COVID-19 Outbreak on E-learning in Business Industry Development
5.5 Consumer Behavior Analysis

6 Players Profiles
6.1.1 Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Competitors
6.1.2 roduct Profiles, Application and Specification
6.1.3 Market Performance (2017-2022)
6.1.4 Business Overview

7 Global E-learning in Business Sales and Revenue Region Wise (2017-2022)
7.1 Global E-learning in Business Sales and Market Share, Region Wise (2017-2022)
7.2 Global E-learning in Business Revenue (Revenue) and Market Share, Region Wise (2017-2022)
7.3 Global E-learning in Business Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2017-2022)
7.4 United States E-learning in Business Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2017-2022)
7.4.1 United States E-learning in Business Market Under COVID-19
7.5 Europe E-learning in Business Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2017-2022)
7.5.1 Europe E-learning in Business Market Under COVID-19
7.6 China E-learning in Business Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2017-2022)
7.6.1 China E-learning in Business Market Under COVID-19
7.7 Japan E-learning in Business Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2017-2022)
7.7.1 Japan E-learning in Business Market Under COVID-19
7.8 India E-learning in Business Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2017-2022)
7.8.1 India E-learning in Business Market Under COVID-19
7.9 Southeast Asia E-learning in Business Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2017-2022)
7.9.1 Southeast Asia E-learning in Business Market Under COVID-19
7.10 Latin America E-learning in Business Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2017-2022)
7.10.1 Latin America E-learning in Business Market Under COVID-19
7.11 Middle East and Africa E-learning in Business Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2017-2022)
7.11.1 Middle East and Africa E-learning in Business Market Under COVID-19

8 Global E-learning in Business Sales, Revenue (Revenue), Price Trend by Type
8.1 Global E-learning in Business Sales and Market Share by Type (2017-2022)
8.2 Global E-learning in Business Revenue and Market Share by Type (2017-2022)
8.3 Global E-learning in Business Price by Type (2017-2022)
8.4 Global E-learning in Business Sales Growth Rate by Type (2017-2022)
8.4.1 Global E-learning in Business Sales Growth Rate of E-learning in Business without Handle (2017-2022)
8.4.2 Global E-learning in Business Sales Growth Rate of E-learning in Business with Handle (2017-2022)

9 Global E-learning in Business Market Analysis by Application
9.1 Global E-learning in Business Consumption and Market Share by Application (2017-2022)
9.2 Global E-learning in Business Consumption Growth Rate by Application (2017-2022)
9.2.1 Global E-learning in Business Consumption Growth Rate of Commercial Use (2017-2022)
9.2.2 Global E-learning in Business Consumption Growth Rate of Personal Mobility (2017-2022)

10 Global E-learning in Business Market Forecast (2022-2029)
10.1 Global E-learning in Business Sales, Revenue Forecast (2022-2029)
10.1.1 Global E-learning in Business Sales and Growth Rate Forecast (2022-2029)
10.1.2 Global E-learning in Business Revenue and Growth Rate Forecast (2022-2029)
10.1.3 Global E-learning in Business Price and Trend Forecast (2022-2029)
10.2 Global E-learning in Business Sales and Revenue Forecast, Region Wise (2022-2029)
10.2.1 United States E-learning in Business Sales and Revenue Forecast (2022-2029)
10.2.2 Europe E-learning in Business Sales and Revenue Forecast (2022-2029)
10.2.3 China E-learning in Business Sales and Revenue Forecast (2022-2029)
10.2.4 Japan E-learning in Business Sales and Revenue Forecast (2022-2029)
10.2.5 India E-learning in Business Sales and Revenue Forecast (2022-2029)
10.2.6 Southeast Asia E-learning in Business Sales and Revenue Forecast (2022-2029)
10.2.7 Latin America E-learning in Business Sales and Revenue Forecast (2022-2029)
10.2.8 Middle East and Africa E-learning in Business Sales and Revenue Forecast (2022-2029)
10.3 Global E-learning in Business Sales, Revenue and Price Forecast by Type (2022-2029)
10.4 Global E-learning in Business Consumption Forecast by Application (2022-2029)
10.5 E-learning in Business Market Forecast Under COVID-19

11 Research Findings and Conclusion

12 Appendix
12.1 Methodology
12.2 Research Data Source

Purchase this report (Price 2980 USD for a single-user license) -https://www.360researchreports.com/purchase/20765874

About Us:

Market is changing rapidly with the ongoing expansion of the industry. Advancement in the technology has provided today’s businesses with multifaceted advantages resulting in daily economic shifts. Thus, it is very important for a company to comprehend the patterns of the market movements in order to strategize better. An efficient strategy offers the companies with a head start in planning and an edge over the competitors. 360 Research Reports is the credible source for gaining the market reports that will provide you with the lead your business needs.

Contact Us:
Web : https://360researchreports.com/
Email: sales@360researchreports.com
Organization: 360 Research Reports
Phone: +44 20 3239 8187/ +14242530807

For More Related Reports Click Here :

https://www.marketwatch.com/press-release/commodity-trading-platform-market-size-in-2022-is-witnessing-high-growth-with-with-top-countries-data-in-depth-research-in-122-pages-report-2022-07-08

https://www.marketwatch.com/press-release/system-integration-market-size-in-2022-research-high-demand-share-industry-analysis-by-top-manufactures-growth-insights-and-forecasts-to-2029-with-fastest-growing-countries-data-107-pages-report-2022-07-08

https://www.marketwatch.com/press-release/private-security-service-market-research-report-2022-overview-individual-growth-trends-historic-milestones-growth-prospects-competition-scenarios-and-forecast-to-2029-97-pages-report-2022-07-12

https://www.marketwatch.com/press-release/-brown-sugar-market-size-2022-business-trends-upcoming-demand-sales-revenue-and-gross-margin-product-portfolio-cost-structure-forecast-to-2028-2022-07-12

https://www.marketwatch.com/press-release/sap-s4-systems-integrator-services-market-size-in-2022-what-are-the-upcoming-trends-or-opportunities-that-a-start-up-company-can-look-at-in-the-industry-in-depth-analysis-in-100-pages-report-2022-07-14

https://www.marketwatch.com/press-release/cloud-accounting-software-market-size-in-2022-competitive-landscape-of-industry-leaders-top-down-and-bottom-up-approaches-by-top-countries-data-in-depth-analysis-in-128-pages-report-2022-07-15

https://www.marketwatch.com/press-release/prosthetic-market-size-in-2022-industry-analysis-by-top-manufactures-top-countries-data-key-indicators-defination-share-growth-insights-and-forecasts-to-2028-exclusive-106-pages-report-2022-07-17

https://www.marketwatch.com/press-release/intra-operative-3d-navigation-system-market-size-in-2022-strategic-plans-by-business-growth-globally-industry-demand-and-forecast-to-2028-with-top-countries-data-exclusive-92-pages-report-2022-07-18

https://www.marketwatch.com/press-release/companion-animal-external-dewormer-market-in-2022-with-fastest-growing-regions-and-countries-data-101-report-pages-2022-07-19

https://www.marketwatch.com/press-release/software-defined-storage-sds-market-in-2022-industry-analysis-by-top-countries-data-developing-technologies-size-share-revenue-prominent-players-tendencies-and-forecast-exclusive-117-pages-report-2022-07-19

Press Release Distributed by The Express Wire

To view the original version on The Express Wire visit E-learning in Business Market Is Set to Fly High in Years to Come with Top Countries Data | Exclusive Report Spread Across 109 Pages

COMTEX_410641071/2598/2022-07-21T00:17:02

Is there a problem with this press release? Contact the source provider Comtex at editorial@comtex.com. You can also contact MarketWatch Customer Service via our Customer Center.

The MarketWatch News Department was not involved in the creation of this content.

Wed, 20 Jul 2022 21:01:00 -0500 en-US text/html https://www.marketwatch.com/press-release/e-learning-in-business-market-is-set-to-fly-high-in-years-to-come-with-top-countries-data-exclusive-report-spread-across-109-pages-2022-07-21
Killexams : Learning Management System Market 2022 Industry Outlook, Classification, Demand, Regional Analysis and Forecast to 2030

The MarketWatch News Department was not involved in the creation of this content.

Jul 18, 2022 (Alliance News via COMTEX) -- Report Ocean published a new report on the Learning Management System Market. The research report consists of thorough information about demand, growth, opportunities, challenges, and restraints. In addition, it delivers an in-depth analysis of the structure and possibility of global and regional industries.

Some of the key manufacturers involved in the market are IBM Corp., Oracle, SAP SE, Xerox Corp., Pearson Plc, McGraw Hill Co., Blackboard Inc., and D2L Corp. Acquisitions and effective mergers are some of the strategies adopted by the key manufacturers. Other strategies include new product developments and focus on continuous technology innovations.

Global Learning Management System industry valued approximately USD 5.13 billion in 2016 is anticipated to grow with a healthy growth rate of more than 25.11% over the forecast period 2017-2025.

Request To obtain Free demo of This Strategic Report: https://reportocean.com/industry-verticals/sample-request?report_id=16518

The major factors responsible for growth in this industry include the trend of BYOD i.e. Bring Your Own Devices and the rising adoption of digital learning among corporate organizations & institutions. Others drivers for this market are increasing usage of wearable eLearning devices and transpiring technologies like gamification and virtual reality.

The objective of the study is to define market sizes of different segments & countries in previous years and to forecast the values to the next eight years. The report is designed to incorporate both qualitative and quantitative aspects of the industry with respect to each of the regions and countries involved in the study. Furthermore, the report also caters the detailed information about the crucial aspects such as drivers & restraining factors which will define the future growth of the market. Additionally, it will also incorporate the opportunities available in micro markets for stakeholders to invest, detailed analysis of competitive landscape and product offerings of key players.

The detailed segments and sub-segment of the market are explained below:

Application:
> Content Management
> Administration
> Learner Management

Delivery Mode:
> Distance Learning
> Instructor-led Training

Deployment:
> Cloud
> On Premise

User Type:
> Academic
> Corporate

Download Free demo Report, SPECIAL OFFER (Avail an Up-to 30% discount on this report)https://reportocean.com/industry-verticals/sample-request?report_id=16518

Vertical:
> Banking, Financial Services and Insurance (BFSI)
> Government
> Telecommunications & IT (ICT)
> Retail
> Education
> Healthcare
> Biopharma

Regions:
> North America
o U.S.
o Canada
> Europe
o UK
o Germany
> Asia Pacific
o China
o India
o Japan
> Latin America
o Brazil
o Mexico
> Rest of the World

Furthermore, the years considered for the study are as follows:

Historical year – 2015
Base year – 2016
Forecast period – 2017 to 2025

Target Audience of the Learning Management System Market Study

> Key Consulting Companies & Advisors
> Large, medium-sized, and small enterprises
> Venture capitalists
> Value-Added Resellers (VARs)
> Third-party knowledge providers
> Investment bankers
> Investors

Request full Report Description, TOC, Table of Figure, Chart, etc. @https://reportocean.com/industry-verticals/sample-request?report_id=16518

Table of Contents:

  • Market Overview
  • Market Dynamics
  • Associated Industry Assessment
  • Market Competitive Landscape
  • Analysis of Leading Companies
  • Market Analysis and Forecast, By Product Types
  • Market Analysis and Forecast, By Applications

What is the goal of the report?

The market report presents the estimated size of the ICT market at the end of the forecast period. The report also examines historical and current market sizes. During the forecast period, the report analyses the growth rate, market size, and market valuation. The report presents current trends in the industry and the future potential of the North America, Asia Pacific, Europe, Latin America, and the Middle East and Africa markets. The report offers a comprehensive view of the market based on geographic scope, market segmentation, and key player financial performance.

What is the key information extracted from the report?

  • Extensive information on factors estimated to affect the Market growth and market share during the forecast period is presented in the report.
  • The report offers the present scenario and future growth prospects Market in various geographical regions.
  • The competitive landscape analysis on the market as well as the qualitative and quantitative information is delivered.
  • The SWOT analysis is conducted along with Porter’s Five Force analysis.
  • The in-depth analysis provides an insight into the Market, underlining the growth rate and opportunities offered in the business.

Request Full Report https://reportocean.com/industry-verticals/sample-request?report_id=16518

About Report Ocean:
We are the best market research reports provider in the industry. Report Ocean believes in providing quality reports to clients to meet the top line and bottom line goals which will boost your market share in today's competitive environment. Report Ocean is a 'one-stop solution' for individuals, organizations, and industries that are looking for innovative market research reports.

Get in Touch with Us:
Report Ocean:
Email: sales@reportocean.com
Address: 500 N Michigan Ave, Suite 600, Chicago, Illinois 60611 - UNITED STATES
Tel:+1 888 212 3539 (US - TOLL FREE)
Website: https://www.reportocean.com

COMTEX_410459695/2796/2022-07-18T07:00:56

The MarketWatch News Department was not involved in the creation of this content.

Mon, 18 Jul 2022 16:38:00 -0500 en-US text/html https://www.marketwatch.com/press-release/learning-management-system-market-2022-industry-outlook-classification-demand-regional-analysis-and-forecast-to-2030-2022-07-18
C_TBW60_74 exam dump and training guide direct download
Training Exams List