Download today free C2180-188 braindumps and dump

Just go through our C2180-188 mock exam and braindumps and ensure your success in real C2180-188 test.You will breeze through your C2180-188 test with good grades or your cashback. We have totaled a data set of C2180-188 dump from the real test to get you furnished with braindumps and braindumps to finish C2180-188 test at the primary endeavor. Just introduce our VCE test system and prepare. You will finish the C2180-188 test.

Exam Code: C2180-188 Practice test 2022 by Killexams.com team
IBM WebSphere Lombardi Edition V7.2 - BPM Program Management
IBM Management test
Killexams : IBM Management test - BingNews https://killexams.com/pass4sure/exam-detail/C2180-188 Search results Killexams : IBM Management test - BingNews https://killexams.com/pass4sure/exam-detail/C2180-188 https://killexams.com/exam_list/IBM Killexams : Risk Prioritisation with Attack Surface Management (Guest blog by IBM)

Guest blog by Scott Haddow, Security Client Exec at IBM #Cyber2022

Cyber Security loves buzzwords, but they get over-exposed faster than Kevin Hart.  Looking at you, Zero-Trust.

If you haven't heard about Attack Surface Management (ASM) yet, you will.  But bear with me, because that's not a bad thing. 

ASM is still on the 'shiny and new' slope of Gartner's hype cycle, but it's already real and out in the wild keeping organisations safer. 

From cloud migrations to IoT integration and hybrid working, IT environments are changing fast – and that’s also true for their attack surfaces, leading to poor visibility of risk in real-time.

Q/ When is the best time to find weaknesses?

A/ Before an attack happens. 

It’s a beautiful concept that may seem naïve when measured against the daily reality of a SOC.  Cyber-nirvana is the goal but hard to get there if you’re stamping out fires all day.  

And this is where we approach the paradox at the heart of cyber security today, having largely abandoned the concept of the completely defensible perimeter.  Almost all the technologies in the SOC are designed to spot things after they happen; that is – after the threat actor is doing something we don’t want them to do inside our network.  AI and machine learning driven uber-suites of clever code that spot, correlate and jump on those trails before they snowball into a full-blown cyber heist.   I’m not suggesting that we don’t need all of that and a perimeter – because we do, but threat actors understand our defenses and are finding ways to slip under the radar of reactive security tooling in a never-ending game of cat and mouse. 

There’s a lot of different numbers for the average dwell time of an attacker before an event like ransomware detonation – but broadly the numbers agree that it’s more than 100 and less than 300 days.  That’s a long time to supply someone to figure out how your operation works.

Add to that that only about 1 in 5 enterprises can monitor their attack surfaces for changes in real time, or to put it another way, four fifths of the world’s enterprises can’t.    

The old question of how you would break into your own home if you were locked out is useful here but falls short when describing the cyber-attack surface, because you’d need to talk about windows you didn’t know you had and prevent an attacker from getting in through a plughole. 

The typical attacker has a laptop, some tools and an internet connection when they begin looking for a way in.  But it’s best not to underestimate our adversary – marketing shows us a lot of people in hoodies hunched over laptops, but it would be scarier to show a 24x7 Ransomware-aaS operation in the C2C marketplace.   This is organized and profitable crime, but regardless of the maturity of the organisation or individual attacking you, they begin on the outside of your environment.  What they look for is internet facing services, IPs, domains, networks, hostnames and so on.    In the process they will uncover your shadow IT, forgotten assets (like that test/dev environment everyone assumed someone else tore down), and other blind-spots and process failures, for example a brute-forceable and exposed login applet, or down-rev web server.  Those are the chinks in the armour offering a route in, and because they face out into the internet, they are highly tempting.  But (of course) they can’t be fixed until you know about them – which means that we need to wait for the lights to blink on the big reactive dashboard, and then you’ve got another fire to stamp out.

If we want to move to a proactive posture, using an Attack Surface Management tool like IBM Randori which scopes your attack surface like an attacker is a smart move.  If we can see what they see when they look at us from the outside, then we have a prioritized inventory of attack risk. 

That’s important because the last thing anyone needs is a report with an overwhelming list of to-do items on it, because we’re already putting out fires as it is.  Having issues ranked by their ‘temptation score’ lets the SOC team focus on the urgent fixes, and then schedule work on the less urgent stuff.  And because Randori only looks at your attack surface from the outside, it’s agentless and doesn’t need appliances.

Having a prioritized inventory of risk let’s you find those open windows and close them, which makes it harder for the attacker to get in. 

Nobody wants to be over exposed, not even Kevin Hart.

IBM has acquired Randori, a leading Attack Surface Management provider and recently named a cool vendor by Gartner.  Although ASM is an emerging technology IBM has never been afraid to be at the forefront of innovation. Find out more here https://www.randori.com/


Help to shape and govern the work of techUK’s Cyber Security Programme

Did you know that nominations are now open* for techUK’s Cyber Management Committee? We’re looking for senior representatives from cyber security companies across the UK to help lead the work of our Cyber Security Programme over the next two years. Find out more and how to nominate yourself/a colleagues here.

*Deadline to submit nomination forms is 17:00 on Tuesday 18 October.


Upcoming events 

Cyber Innovation Den

On Thursday 3 November, techUK will host our fourth annual Cyber Innovation Den online. This year we’ll explore efforts being made to realised the ambition set out in the National Cyber Strategy, with speakers taking a look at the progress we’ve seen to date, including the foundation of the UK Cyber Security Council, the reinvigoration of the Cyber Growth Partnership and the continued growth in the value of the sector to the UK economy.

Book now!

Cyber Security Dinner

In November techUK will host the first ever Cyber Security Dinner. The dinner will be a fantastic networking opportunity, bringing together senior stakeholders from across industry and government for informal discussions around some of the key cyber security issues for 2022 and beyond.

Book now!


Get involved

All techUK's work is led by our members - keep in touch or get involved by joining one of the groups below.

The Cyber Security Group provides a coherent voice for industry working in "high threat" areas - including defence, national security and resilience, the protection of critical national infrastructure, intelligence and organised crime.

The Cyber Management Committee sets the strategic vision for the cyber security programme, helping the programme engage with government and senior industry stakeholders.

The CSSMEF is comprised of SME companies from the techUK membership. The CSSMEF seeks to include a broad grouping of different SME companies working in the Cyber Security (CS) sectors.

Authors

Scott Haddow

Security Client Exec, IBM

Thu, 13 Oct 2022 20:13:00 -0500 text/html https://www.techuk.org/resource/ibm-cyber2022.html
Killexams : As NIST Prepares For Quantum Safe Security, IBM Rolls Out Support

The world of cryptography moves at a very slow, but steady pace. New cryptography standards must be vetted over an extended period and therefore new threats to existing standards need to be judged by decades-long timelines because updating crypto standards is a multiyear journey. Quantum computing is an important threat looming on the horizon. Quantum computers can solve many equations simultaneously, and based on Shor’s Algorithm, crypto experts estimate that they will be able to crack asymmetric encryption. In addition, Grover’s algorithm provides a quadratic reduction in decryption time of symmetric encryption. And the question these same crypto experts try to answer is not if this will happen, but when.

Today’s crypto algorithms use mathematical problems such as factorization of large numbers to protect data. With fault-tolerant quantum computers, factorization can be solved in theory in just a few hours using Shor’s algorithm. This same capability also compromises cryptographic methods based on the difficulty of solving the discrete logarithm problems.

The term used to describe these new, sturdier crypto standards is “quantum safe.” The challenge is we don’t know exactly when fault-tolerant quantum computers will have the power to consistently break existing encryption standards, which are now in wide use. There’s also a concern that some parties could get and store encrypted data for decryption later, when suitably capable quantum computers are available. Even if the data is over ten years old, there still could be relevant confidential information in the stored data. Think state secrets, financial and securities records and transactions, health records, or even private or classified communications between public and/or government figures.

U.S. Department of Commerce’s National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) believes it’s possible that RSA2048 encryption can be cracked by 2035. Other U.S. government agencies and other security-minded entities have similar timelines. Rather than wait for the last minute to upgrade security, NIST started a competition to develop quantum-safe encryption back in 2016. After several rounds of reviews, on July 5th of this year, NIST chose four algorithms for the final stages of review before setting the standard. IBM developed three of them, two of those are supported in IBM’s Z16 mainframe today.

NISTNIST Announces First Four Quantum-Resistant Cryptographic Algorithms

The new IBM crypto algorithms are based on a family of math problems called structured lattices. Lattice problems have a unique characteristic that will make it reasonably difficult to solve with quantum computing. Structured lattice problems require solving for two unknowns – a multiplier array and an offset and is extremely difficult for quantum computing to solve the lattice problems. The shortest vector problem (SVP) and the closest vector problem (CVP) – upon which lattice cryptography is built – is considered extremely difficult to a quantum computer to solve. Each candidate crypto algorithm is evaluated not just for data security, but also for performance - the overhead cannot be too large for wide spread use.

The final selections are expected in 2024, but there’s still a chance there will be changes before the final standards are released.

MORE FROM FORBESIBM Lattice Cryptography Is Needed Now To Defend Against Quantum Computing Future

IBM Supports Quantum Safe in New Z-Series Mainframes

IBM made a strategic bet before the final NIST selections. The recently released IBM Z16 Series computers already support two of the final four quantum safe crypto candidates: the CRYSTALS-Kyber public-key encryption and the CRYSTALS-Dilithium digital signature algorithms. IBM is set to work with the industry to substantiate these algorithms in production systems. Initially, IBM is using its tape drive storage systems as a test platform. Because tape is often used for cold storage, it's an excellent medium for long-term data protection. IBM is working with its client base to find the appropriate way to roll out quantum-safe encryption to the market. This must be approached as a life cycle transformation. And, in fact, IBM is working with its customers to create a crypto-agile solution, which allows the exact crypto algorithm to change at any point in time without disrupting the entire system. It’s not just a rip and replace process. With crypto-agility, the algorithm is abstracted from the system software stack so a new algorithms can be deployed seamlessly. IBM is developing tools making crypto status part of the overall observability with a suitable dashboard to see crypto events, etc.

These new algorithms must be deployable to existing computing platforms, even at the edge. However, it's not going to feasible to upgrade every system; it’s probably going to be an industry-by-industry effort and industry consortia will be required. For example, IBM, GSMA (Global System for Mobile Communication Association), and Vodafone recently announced they will work via a GSMA Task Force to identify a process to implement quantum-safe technologies across critical telecommunications infrastructure, including the networks underpinning internet access and public utility management. The telecommunication network carries financial data, health information, public-sector infrastructure systems, and sensitive business data which needs to be protected as it traverses global networks.

IBM Research BlogHow IBM is helping make the world's networks quantum safe | IBM Research Blog

What’s Next for Quantum Safe Algorithms

Fault-tolerant quantum computing is coming. When it will be available is still a guessing game, but the people who most care about data security are targeting 2035 to have quantum-safe cryptographic algorithms in place to meet the threat. But that’s not good enough. We need to start protecting critical data and infrastructure sooner than that, considering the length of time systems are deployed in the field and data is stored. Systems such as satellites and power stations are not easy to update in the field.

And there’s data that must be stored securely for future retrieval, including HIPAA (for medical applications), tax records, toxic substance control act and clinical trial data, and others.

Even after the deployment of these new algorithms, this is not the end – there may still be developments that can break even the next generation quantum-safe algorithms. The struggle between those that want to keep systems and data safe and those that want to crack them continues and why companies should look to building in crypto agility into their security plans.

Tirias Research tracks and consults for companies throughout the electronics ecosystem from semiconductors to systems and sensors to the cloud. Members of the Tirias Research team have consulted for IBM and other companies throughout the Security, AI and Quantum ecosystems.

Fri, 07 Oct 2022 11:36:00 -0500 Kevin Krewell en text/html https://www.forbes.com/sites/tiriasresearch/2022/10/07/as-nist-prepares-for-quantum-safe-security-ibm-rolls-out-support/
Killexams : Better Buy: IBM Stock vs. 2-Year Treasury Notes

Investors this year increasingly turned away from dividend stocks in favor of the rising yields being offered on bonds. Given that investors can now earn a 4.3% return on a 2-year Treasury note, many prefer that guaranteed return to the risks of putting money into the stock market.

International Business Machines (IBM 1.23%) offers a dividend yield that exceeds that bond return. But with a bear market in progress, are investors better served to take a chance on the cloud stock or to take the 4.3% return at virtually zero risk?

IBM and its dividend

IBM didn't participate in the bull market of the 2010s. The stock dropped as its tech businesses suffered a considerable growth slowdown. In an effort to change that, IBM pivoted into the cloud computing sector aggressively, in part via its $34 billion purchase of Red Hat in 2019. Grand View Research forecasts a compound annual growth rate of 16% through 2030 for the cloud industry. Growth like that could certainly help both IBM and its stock.

Also, IBM spun off its managed infrastructure business into a new public company, Kyndryl. This business was less of a fit with the parent company amid its pivot to the cloud. Separating it off should make it easier for IBM to grow its revenue.

Time will tell if these moves can help the stock price recover. Nonetheless, IBM currently pays its shareholders $1.65 per share every quarter, or $6.60 per share annually. At the current stock price, that adds up to a yield of 5.6% per year. Moreover, depending on your financial situation, the IRS may tax your dividends at a lower capital gains rate, which can offer an added advantage.

Additionally, IBM hiked its payout annually for 27 consecutive years, making it a Dividend Aristocrat. That status carries some importance as many income investors will be more inclined to buy and hold IBM stock because of this status. Also, since abandoning Dividend Aristocrat status tends to hurt a stock, management will probably prioritize maintaining it by continuing to raise those payouts.

Investors also can also reinvest their dividend payments into more IBM stock. However, such newly purchased shares will pay you the dividend yield at that time. The return will rise if the stock falls since investors can buy the exact cash return at a lower price. Conversely, cash yields will drop if the stock rises, but those investors still benefit since the stock has increased in value.

What to know about 2-year Treasury notes

U.S. Treasury notes offer more stability than stocks such as IBM. Investors who purchase the 2-year Treasury note receive semiannual interest payments. At the current interest rate of 4.3%, investors will receive a 2.15% cash return on their invested amount in each of the subsequent three six-month periods. In the fourth period, when the note matures, investors receive the final 2.15% payment along with the return of their principal.

Investors should also be aware that bond values can fluctuate. If interest rates drop, the value of the bond will fall; the opposite will happen if rates rise. This affects investors if they decide to sell the bond early. Upon maturity, the note will return to its par (or nominal) value.

Additionally, bond interest payments are subject to federal income tax but exempt from state and local taxes. In some cases, this is higher than taxes on dividends. Still, bond issuers are obligated to make such payments. In contrast, IBM faces no legal obligation to continue its dividend.

Also, like with a stock, investors can reinvest their interest payments into more notes or other forms of Treasury bonds. However, those purchases will be subject to the prevailing interest rates at that time.

IBM or the 2-year Treasury note?

Investors who lack much risk tolerance should choose the Treasury note. Given its guaranteed return, they will not have to worry about volatility.

Nonetheless, for investors comfortable with buying stocks, IBM is a surprisingly strong buy. The cloud industry is in growth mode, which should propel IBM stock to a long-awaited turnaround. Moreover, IBM has repeatedly shown it wants to hold on to its Dividend Aristocrat status. This should supply its income investors returns that are not only larger than the bonds offer, but also likely to increase in size.

Will Healy has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Fri, 14 Oct 2022 00:20:00 -0500 Will Healy en text/html https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/10/14/better-buy-ibm-stock-vs-2-year-treasury-note/
Killexams : IBM’s former CEO downplays the importance of a college degree for six-figure earning ‘new collar’ jobs that now make up half of its workers

A four-year bachelor’s degree has long been the first rung to climbing America’s corporate ladder.

But the move to prioritize skills over a college education is sweeping through some of America’s largest companies, including Google, EY, Microsoft, and Apple. Strong proponents say the shift helps circumvent a needless barrier to workplace diversity.

“I really do believe an inclusive diverse workforce is better for your company, it’s good for the business,” Ginni Rometty, former IBM CEO, told Fortune Media CEO Alan Murray during a panel last month for Connect, Fortune’s executive education community. “That’s not just altruistic.”

Under Rometty’s leadership in 2016, tech giant IBM coined the term “new collar jobs” in reference to roles that require a specific set of skills rather than a four-year degree. It’s a personal commitment for Rometty, one that hits close to home for the 40-year IBM veteran.

When Rometty was 16, her father left the family, leaving her mother, who’d never worked outside the home, suddenly in the position to provide.

“She had four children and nothing past high school, and she had to get a job to…get us out of this downward spiral,” Rometty recalled to Murray. “What I saw in that was that my mother had aptitude; she wasn’t dumb, she just didn’t have access, and that forever stayed in my mind.”

When Rometty became CEO in 2012 following the Great Recession, the U.S. unemployment rate hovered around 8%. Despite the influx of applicants, she struggled to find employees who were trained in the particular cybersecurity area she was looking for.

“I realized I couldn’t hire them, so I had to start building them,” she said.

In 2011, IBM launched a corporate social responsibility effort called the Pathways in Technology Early College High School (P-TECH) in Brooklyn. It’s since expanded to 11 states in the U.S. and 28 countries.

Through P-TECH, Rometty visited “a very poor high school in a bad neighborhood” that received the company’s support, as well as a community college where IBM was offering help with a technology-based curriculum and internships.

“Voilà! These kids could do the work. I didn’t have [applicants with] college degrees, so I learned that propensity to learn is way more important than just having a degree,” Rometty said.

Realizing the students were fully capable of the tasks that IBM needed moved Rometty to return to the drawing board when it came to IBM’s own application process and whom it was reaching. She said that at the time, 95% of job openings at IBM required a four-year degree. As of January 2021, less than half do, and the company is continuously reevaluating its roles.

For the jobs that now no longer require degrees and instead rely on skills and willingness to learn, IBM had always hired Ph.D. holders from the very best Ivy League schools, Rometty told Murray. But data shows that the degree-less hires for the same jobs performed just as well. “They were more loyal, higher retention, and many went on to get college degrees,” she said.

Rometty has since become cochair of OneTen, a civic organization committed to hiring, promoting, and advancing 1 million Black individuals without four-year degrees within the next 10 years.

If college degrees no longer become compulsory for white-collar jobs, many other qualifications—skills that couldn’t be easily taught in a boot camp, apprenticeship program, or in the first month on the job—could die off, too, University of Virginia Darden School of Business professor Sean Martin told Fortune last year.

“The companies themselves miss out on people that research suggests…might be less entitled, more culturally savvy, more desirous of being there,” Martin said. Rather than pedigree, he added, hiring managers should look for motivation.

That’s certainly the case at IBM. Once the company widened its scope, Rometty said, the propensity to learn quickly became more of an important hiring factor than just a degree.

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com

More from Fortune:

A 2007 flashback: home flippers are in trouble again

Managing Gen Z is like working with people ‘from a different country’

The Renault Nissan empire once held together by fugitive Carlos Ghosn may slowly be unraveling

PayPal tells users it will fine them $2,500 for misinformation, then backtracks immediately

Sun, 16 Oct 2022 06:27:00 -0500 en-US text/html https://finance.yahoo.com/news/ibm-former-ceo-downplays-importance-165139880.html
Killexams : Test Data Management Market Share 2022 Key Opportunities, Regional Segments, Business Statistics, Development, Size and Growth Forecast to 2029

The MarketWatch News Department was not involved in the creation of this content.

Oct 04, 2022 (The Expresswire) -- Global “Test Data Management Market” Report 2022-2029 discusses an innovative concept of top growing business strategies, development trends, major key players with key dynamics. It provides in-depth and comprehensive analysis of overall growth statistics, business prospects, latest opportunities and challenges. Test Data Management market report gives analytical overview of key companies, business profiles, investment plans, CAGR status, industry revenue estimations and SWOT analysis. It also sheds light on demand scope, future trends, financial overview, production and consumption analysis, and segmentation at global and regional level.

Test Data Management Market has witnessed a growth from USD million from 2017 to 2022 with a highest CAGR is estimated to reach USD in 2029.

Get a trial PDF of the report at - https://www.marketresearchguru.com/enquiry/request-sample/21768077

Test data management is the process of planning, designing, storing and managing software quality-testing processes and methodologies. It allows the software quality and testing team to have control over the data, files, rules, and policies produced during the entire software-testing life cycle.

The report focuses on the Test Data Management market size, segment size (mainly covering product type, application, and geography), competitor landscape, accurate status, and development trends. Furthermore, the report provides detailed cost analysis, supply chain. Technological innovation and advancement will further optimize the performance of the product, making it more widely used in downstream applications. Moreover, Consumer behavior analysis and market dynamics (drivers, restraints, opportunities) provides crucial information for knowing the Test Data Management market.

Get a trial PDF of the Test Data Management Market Report

The report can help to understand the market and strategize for business expansion accordingly. In the strategy analysis, it gives insights from marketing channel and market positioning to potential growth strategies, providing in-depth analysis for new entrants or exists competitors in the Test Data Management industry.

The report covers extensive analysis of the key market players in the market, along with their business overview, expansion plans, and strategies. The key players studied in the report include:

● Innovative Routines International ● Compuware ● CA Technologies ● Ekobit ● IBM ● MENTIS ● Solix Technologies ● Informatica ● Cigniti Technologies ● Delphix Corporation ● Infosys ● DATPROF ● Original Software Group

Based on types, the Test Data Management market from 2017 to 2029 is primarily split into:

● Implementation ● Consulting ● Support and Maintenance

Based on applications, the Test Data Management market from 2017 to 2029 covers:

● Data Subsetting ● Data Masking ● Data Profiling and Analysis ● Data Compliance and Security ● Synthetic Test Data Generation ● Others

Inquire or Share Your Questions If Any Before the Purchasing This Report - https://www.marketresearchguru.com/enquiry/pre-order-enquiry/21768077

The report also tracks the latest market dynamics, such as driving factors, restraining factors, and industry news like mergers, acquisitions, and investments. It provides market size (value and volume), market share, growth rate by types, applications, and combines both qualitative and quantitative methods to make micro and macro forecasts in different regions or countries.

Major Regions or countries covered in this report:

● United States ● Europe ● China ● Japan ● India ● Southeast Asia ● Latin America ● Middle East and Africa ● Others

Some of the Key Questions Answered in this Report:

● What is the Test Data Management market size at the regional and country-level? ● What are the key drivers, restraints, opportunities, and challenges of the Test Data Management market, and how they are expected to impact the market? ● What is the global (North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, South America, Middle East and Africa) sales value, production value, consumption value, import and export of Test Data Management? ● Who are the global key manufacturers of the Test Data Management Industry? How is their operating situation (capacity, production, sales, price, cost, gross, and revenue)? ● What are the Test Data Management market opportunities and threats faced by the vendors in the global Test Data Management Industry? ● Which application/end-user or product type may seek incremental growth prospects? What is the market share of each type and application? ● What focused approach and constraints are holding the Test Data Management market? ● What are the different sales, marketing, and distribution channels in the global industry? ● What are the upstream raw materials and manufacturing equipment of Test Data Management along with the manufacturing process of Test Data Management? ● What are the key market trends impacting the growth of the Test Data Management market? ● Economic impact on the Test Data Management industry and development trend of the Test Data Management industry.

To Understand How Covid-19 Impact Is Covered in This Report - https://marketresearchguru.com/enquiry/request-covid19/21768077

Following Chapter Covered in the Test Data Management Market Research:

Chapter 1 provides an overview of Test Data Management market, containing global revenue and CAGR. The forecast and analysis of Test Data Management market by type, application, and region are also presented in this chapter.

Chapter 2 is about the market landscape and major players. It provides competitive situation and market concentration status along with the basic information of these players.

Chapter 3 introduces the industrial chain of Test Data Management. Industrial chain analysis, raw material (suppliers, price, supply and demand, market concentration rate) and downstream buyers are analyzed in this chapter.

Chapter 4 concentrates on manufacturing analysis, including cost structure analysis and process analysis, making up a comprehensive analysis of manufacturing cost.

Chapter 5 provides clear insights into market dynamics, the influence of COVID-19 in Test Data Management industry, consumer behavior analysis.

Chapter 6 provides a full-scale analysis of major players in Test Data Management industry. The basic information, as well as the profiles, applications and specifications of products market performance along with Business Overview are offered.

Chapter 7 pays attention to the sales, revenue, price and gross margin of Test Data Management in markets of different regions. The analysis on sales, revenue, price and gross margin of the global market is covered in this part.

Chapter 8 gives a worldwide view of Test Data Management market. It includes sales, revenue, price, market share and the growth rate by type.

Chapter 9 focuses on the application of Test Data Management, by analyzing the consumption and its growth rate of each application.

Chapter 10 prospects the whole Test Data Management market, including the global sales and revenue forecast, regional forecast. It also foresees the Test Data Management market by type and application.

Purchase this Report (Price 3450 USD for a Single-User License) - https://marketresearchguru.com/purchase/21768077

Detailed TOC of Test Data Management Market Forecast Report 2022-2029:

1 Test Data Management Market Overview

1.1 Product Overview and Scope of Test Data Management

1.2 Segment by Type

1.3 Global Segment by Application

1.4 Global Market, Region Wise (2017-2022)

1.5 Global Market Size of Test Data Management (2017-2029)

2 Global Test Data Management Market Landscape by Player

2.1 Global Test Data Management Sales and Share by Player (2017-2022)

2.2 Global Revenue and Market Share by Player (2017-2022)

2.3 Global Average Price by Player (2017-2022)

2.4 Global Gross Margin by Player (2017-2022)

2.5 Manufacturing Base Distribution, Sales Area and Product Type by Player

2.6 Market Competitive Situation and Trends

3 Test Data Management Upstream and Downstream Analysis

3.1 Industrial Chain Analysis

3.2 Key Raw Materials Suppliers and Price Analysis

3.3 Key Raw Materials Supply and Demand Analysis

3.4 Manufacturing Process Analysis

3.5 Market Concentration Rate of Raw Materials

3.6 Downstream Buyers

3.7 Value Chain Status Under COVID-19

4 Test Data Management Manufacturing Cost Analysis

4.1 Manufacturing Cost Structure Analysis

4.2 Test Data Management Key Raw Materials Cost Analysis

4.3 Labor Cost Analysis

4.4 Energy Costs Analysis

4.5 RandD Costs Analysis

5 Market Dynamics

5.1 Drivers

5.2 Restraints and Challenges

5.3 Opportunities

5.3.1 Advances in Innovation and Technology for Test Data Management

5.3.2 Increased Demand in Emerging Markets

5.4 Test Data Management Industry Development Trends under COVID-19 Outbreak

5.4.1 Global COVID-19 Status Overview

5.4.2 Influence of COVID-19 Outbreak on Test Data Management Industry Development

5.5 Consumer Behavior Analysis

6 Players Profiles

6.1 Company A

6.1.1 Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Competitors

6.1.2 Test Data Management Product Profiles, Application and Specification

6.1.3 Test Data Management Market Performance (2017-2022)

6.1.4 Business Overview

6.2 Company B

6.2.1 Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Competitors

6.2.2 Test Data Management Product Profiles, Application and Specification

6.2.3 Test Data Management Market Performance (2017-2022)

6.2.4 Business Overview

7 Global Test Data Management Sales and Revenue Region Wise (2017-2022)

7.1 Global Sales and Market Share, Region Wise (2017-2022)

7.2 Global Revenue (Revenue) and Market Share, Region Wise (2017-2022)

7.3 Global Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2017-2022)

8 Global Test Data Management Sales, Revenue (Revenue), Price Trend by Type

8.1 Global Sales and Market Share by Type (2017-2022)

8.2 Global Revenue and Market Share by Type (2017-2022)

8.3 Global Price by Type (2017-2022)

8.4 Global Sales Growth Rate by Type (2017-2022)

9 Global Test Data Management Market Analysis by Application

9.1 Global Consumption and Market Share by Application (2017-2022)

9.2 Global Consumption Growth Rate by Application (2017-2022)

10 Global Test Data Management Market Forecast (2022-2029)

10.1 Global Sales, Revenue Forecast (2022-2029)

10.2 Global Sales and Revenue Forecast, Region Wise (2022-2029)

10.3 Global Sales, Revenue and Price Forecast by Type (2022-2029)

10.4 Global Consumption Forecast by Application (2022-2029)

10.5 Test Data Management Market Forecast Under COVID-19

11 Research Findings and Conclusion

12 Appendix

12.1 Methodology

12.2 Research Data Source

For Detailed TOC - https://marketresearchguru.com/TOC/21768077#TOC

Contact Us:

Market Research Guru

Phone: US +14242530807

UK +44 20 3239 8187

Email: sales@marketresearchguru.com

Web: https://www.marketresearchguru.com

Our Other Reports:

Doughnuts Market

Home Dehumidifier Market

Fish Farming Products Market

Reflective Glass Market

Sambal Market

Press Release Distributed by The Express Wire

To view the original version on The Express Wire visit Test Data Management Market Share 2022 Key Opportunities, Regional Segments, Business Statistics, Development, Size and Growth Forecast to 2029

COMTEX_415861489/2598/2022-10-04T00:51:24

Is there a problem with this press release? Contact the source provider Comtex at editorial@comtex.com. You can also contact MarketWatch Customer Service via our Customer Center.

The MarketWatch News Department was not involved in the creation of this content.

Mon, 03 Oct 2022 16:51:00 -0500 en-US text/html https://www.marketwatch.com/press-release/test-data-management-market-share-2022-key-opportunities-regional-segments-business-statistics-development-size-and-growth-forecast-to-2029-2022-10-04
Killexams : See Which Of The Latest 13F Filers Holds IBM No result found, try new keyword!In terms of shares owned, we count 6 of the above funds having increased existing IBM positions from 06/30/2022 to 09/30/2022, with 2 having decreased their positions. Looking beyond these ... Thu, 13 Oct 2022 02:26:00 -0500 text/html https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/see-which-of-the-latest-13f-filers-holds-ibm-1 Killexams : IBM Redefines Hybrid Cloud Application and Data Storage Adding Red Hat Storage to IBM Offerings

Newly expanded software-defined storage portfolio enables IBM to deliver a consistent experience from edge-to-core-to-cloud

ARMONK, N.Y., Oct. 4, 2022 /PRNewswire/ -- IBM (NYSE: IBM) announced today it will add Red Hat storage products and Red Hat associate teams to the IBM Storage business unit, bringing consistent application and data storage across on-premises infrastructure and cloud.

IBM Corporation logo. (PRNewsfoto/IBM)

With the move, IBM will integrate the storage technologies from Red Hat OpenShift Data Foundation (ODF) as the foundation for IBM Spectrum Fusion. This combines IBM and Red Hat's container storage technologies for data services and helps accelerate IBM's capabilities in the burgeoning Kubernetes platform market.

In addition, IBM intends to offer new Ceph solutions delivering a unified and software defined storage platform that bridges the architectural divide between the data center and cloud providers. This further advances IBM's leadership in the software defined storage and Kubernetes platform markets.

According to Gartner, by 2025, 60% of infrastructure and operations (I&O) leaders will implement at least one of the hybrid cloud storage architectures, which is a significant increase from 20% in 2022.1 IBM's software defined storage strategy is to take a "born in the cloud, for the cloud" approach—unlocking bi-directional application and data mobility based on a shared, secure, and cloud-scale software defined storage foundation.

"Red Hat and IBM have been working closely for many years, and today's announcement enhances our partnership and streamlines our portfolios," said Denis Kennelly, general manager of IBM Storage, IBM Systems. "By bringing together the teams and integrating our products under one roof, we are accelerating the IBM's hybrid cloud storage strategy while maintaining commitments to Red Hat customers and the open-source community."

"Red Hat and IBM have a shared belief in the mission of hybrid cloud-native storage and its potential to help customers transform their applications and data," said Joe Fernandes, vice president of hybrid platforms, Red Hat. "With IBM Storage taking stewardship of Red Hat Ceph Storage and OpenShift Data Foundation, IBM will help accelerate open-source storage innovation and expand the market opportunity beyond what each of us could deliver on our own. We believe this is a clear win for customers who can gain a more comprehensive platform with new hybrid cloud-native storage capabilities."

As customers formulate their hybrid cloud strategies, critical to success is the emphasis and importance of infrastructure consistency, application agility, IT management and flexible consumption consistency as deciding factors to bridge across on-premises and cloud deployments.

With these changes to the IBM portfolio, clients will have access to a consistent set of storage services while preserving data resilience, security, and governance across bare metal, virtualized and containerized environments.  Some of the many benefits of the software defined portfolio available from IBM will include:

  • A unified storage experience for all containerized apps running on Red Hat OpenShift: Customers can use IBM Spectrum Fusion (now with Red Hat OpenShift Data Foundation) to achieve the highest levels of performance, scale, automation, data protection, and data security for production applications running on OpenShift that require block, file, and/or object access to data. This enables development teams to focus on the apps, not the ops, with infrastructure-as-code designed for simplified, automated managing and provisioning.

  • A consistent hybrid cloud experience at enterprise levels of scale and resiliency with IBM Ceph: Customers can deliver their private and hybrid cloud architectures on IBM's unified and software defined storage solution, providing capacity and management features. Capabilities include data protection, disaster recovery, high availability, security, auto-scaling, and self-healing portability, that are not tied to hardware, and travel with the data as it moves between on-premises and cloud environments.

  • A single data lakehouse to aggregate and derive intelligence from unstructured data on IBM Spectrum Scale: Customers can address the challenges that often come with quickly scaling a centralized data approach with a single platform to support data-intensive workloads such as AI/ML, high performance computing, and others. Benefits can include less time and effort to administer, reduced data movement and redundancy, direct access to data for analytics tools, advanced schema management and data governance, all supported by distributed file and object storage engineered to be cost effective.

  • Build in the cloud, deploy on-premises with automation: Customers can move developed applications from the cloud to on-premises services, automate the creation of staging environments to test deployment procedures, validate configuration changes, database schema and data updates, and ready package updates to overcome obstacles in production or correct errors before they become a problem that affects business operations.

"IBM and Red Hat speaking with one voice on storage is delivering the synergies derived from IBM's Red Hat acquisition," said Ashish Nadkarni, group vice president and general manager, Infrastructure Systems at IDC. "The combining of the two storage teams is a win for IT organizations as it brings together the best that both offer: An industry-leading storage systems portfolio meets an industry-leading software-defined data services offering. This initiative enables IBM and Red Hat to streamline their family of offerings, passing the benefits to their customers. It also helps accelerate innovation in storage to solve the data challenges for hybrid cloud, all while maintaining their commitment to open source."

Preserving commitment to Red Hat clients and the community

Under the agreement between IBM and Red Hat, IBM will assume Premier Sponsorship of the Ceph Foundation, whose members collaborate to drive innovation, development, marketing, and community events for the Ceph open-source project. IBM Ceph and Red Hat OpenShift Data Foundation will remain 100% open source and will continue to follow an upstream-first model, reinforcing IBM's commitment to these vital communities. Participation by the Ceph leadership team and other aspects of the open-source project is a key IBM priority to maintain and nurture ongoing Red Hat innovation.

Red Hat and IBM intend to complete the transition by January 1, 2023, which will involve the transfer of storage roadmaps and Red Hat associates to the IBM Storage business unit. Following this date, Red Hat OpenShift Platform Plus will continue to include OpenShift Data Foundation, sold by Red Hat and its partners. Additionally, Red Hat OpenStack customers will still be able to buy Red Hat Ceph Storage from Red Hat and its partners. Red Hat OpenShift and Red Hat OpenStack customers with existing subscriptions will be able to maintain and grow their storage footprints as needed, with no change in their Red Hat relationship.

Forthcoming IBM Ceph and IBM Spectrum Fusion storage solutions based on Ceph are expected to ship beginning in the first half of 2023.

Read more about today's news in this blog from Denis Kennelly, general manager of IBM Storage, IBM Systems: "IBM + Red Hat: Doubling Down on Hybrid Cloud Storage"

Statements regarding IBM's future direction and intent are subject to change or withdrawal without notice and represent goals and objectives only. Red Hat, Ceph, Gluster and OpenShift are trademarks or registered trademarks of Red Hat, Inc. or its subsidiaries in the U.S. and other countries.

About IBM 
IBM is a leading global hybrid cloud and AI, and business services provider, helping clients in more than 175 countries capitalize on insights from their data, streamline business processes, reduce costs and gain the competitive edge in their industries. Nearly 3,800 government and corporate entities in critical infrastructure areas such as financial services, telecommunications and healthcare rely on IBM's hybrid cloud platform and Red Hat OpenShift to affect their digital transformations quickly, efficiently, and securely. IBM's breakthrough innovations in AI, quantum computing, industry-specific cloud solutions and business services deliver open and flexible options to our clients. All of this is backed by IBM's legendary commitment to trust, transparency, responsibility, inclusivity, and service. For more information, visit www.ibm.com for more information.

Media Contacts: 
Ben Stricker, IBM 
ben.stricker@ibm.com

1 Gartner, Market Guide for Hybrid Cloud StorageJulia PalmerKevin JiChandra Mukhyala, 3 October 2022

Cision

View original content to get multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/ibm-redefines-hybrid-cloud-application-and-data-storage-adding-red-hat-storage-to-ibm-offerings-301640078.html

SOURCE IBM

Tue, 04 Oct 2022 01:00:00 -0500 en-AU text/html https://au.finance.yahoo.com/news/ibm-redefines-hybrid-cloud-application-130000004.html
Killexams : IBM and AWS Create a Path to Modernization Via Industry-Specific Solutions No result found, try new keyword!The airline also sought to provide analysts with finer data access controls so they could be more analytical and creative when driving revenue management decisions. Working with AWS and IBM ... Wed, 12 Oct 2022 14:17:00 -0500 en-US text/html https://www.cio.com/article/409679/ibm-and-aws-create-a-path-to-modernization-via-industry-specific-solutions.html Killexams : IBM veteran joins Red Hat C-suite in major executive shakeup No result found, try new keyword!Leibrock is a longtime IBMer based in New York, most recently serving as assistant comptroller responsible for enterprise-wide financial management, including forecasts, measurements and IBM’s ... Wed, 12 Oct 2022 02:51:00 -0500 text/html https://www.bizjournals.com/triangle/news/2022/10/12/red-hat-ibm-executive-leadership-changes.html Killexams : IBM Streamlines Red Hat Storage Products Within the IBM Storage Business Unit

IBM announced it will add Red Hat storage product roadmaps and Red Hat associate teams to the IBM Storage business unit, bringing consistent application and data storage across on-premises infrastructure and cloud.

With the move, IBM will integrate the storage technologies from Red Hat OpenShift Data Foundation (ODF) as the foundation for IBM Spectrum Fusion. This combines IBM and Red Hat's container storage technologies for data services and helps accelerate IBM's capabilities in the burgeoning Kubernetes platform market.

In addition, IBM intends to offer new Ceph solutions delivering a unified and software defined storage platform that bridges the architectural divide between the data center and cloud providers. This further advances IBM's leadership in the software defined storage and Kubernetes platform markets, according to the vendor.

"Red Hat and IBM have been working closely for many years, and today's announcement enhances our partnership and streamlines our portfolios," said Denis Kennelly, general manager of IBM Storage, IBM Systems. "By bringing together the teams and integrating our products under one roof, we are accelerating the IBM's hybrid cloud storage strategy while maintaining commitments to Red Hat customers and the open-source community."

Benefits of the software defined portfolio available from IBM will include:

  • A unified storage experience for all containerized apps running on Red Hat OpenShift: Customers can use IBM Spectrum Fusion (now with Red Hat OpenShift Data Foundation) to achieve the highest levels of performance, scale, automation, data protection, and data security for production applications running on OpenShift that require block, file, and/or object access to data. This enables development teams to focus on the apps, not the ops, with infrastructure-as-code designed for simplified, automated managing and provisioning.
  • A consistent hybrid cloud experience at enterprise levels of scale and resiliency with IBM Ceph: Customers can deliver their private and hybrid cloud architectures on IBM's unified and software defined storage solution, providing capacity and management features. Capabilities include data protection, disaster recovery, high availability, security, auto-scaling, and self-healing portability, that are not tied to hardware, and travel with the data as it moves between on-premises and cloud environments.
  • A single data lakehouse to aggregate and derive intelligence from unstructured data on IBM Spectrum Scale: Customers can address the challenges that often come with quickly scaling a centralized data approach with a single platform to support data-intensive workloads such as AI/ML, high performance computing, and others. Benefits can include less time and effort to administer, reduced data movement and redundancy, direct access to data for analytics tools, advanced schema management and data governance, all supported by distributed file and object storage engineered to be cost effective.
  • Build in the cloud, deploy on-premises with automation: Customers can move developed applications from the cloud to on-premises services, automate the creation of staging environments to test deployment procedures, validate configuration changes, database schema and data updates, and ready package updates to overcome obstacles in production or correct errors before they become a problem that affects business operations.

"Red Hat and IBM have a shared belief in the mission of hybrid cloud-native storage and its potential to help customers transform their applications and data," said Joe Fernandes, vice president of hybrid platforms, Red Hat. "With IBM Storage taking stewardship of Red Hat Ceph Storage and OpenShift Data Foundation, IBM will help accelerate open-source storage innovation and expand the market opportunity beyond what each of us could deliver on our own. We believe this is a clear win for customers who can gain a more comprehensive platform with new hybrid cloud-native storage capabilities."

Under the agreement between IBM and Red Hat, IBM will assume Premier Sponsorship of the Ceph Foundation, whose members collaborate to drive innovation, development, marketing, and community events for the Ceph open-source project.

IBM Ceph and Red Hat OpenShift Data Foundation will remain 100% open source and will continue to follow an upstream-first model, reinforcing IBM's commitment to these vital communities, according to the company.

Red Hat and IBM intend to complete the transition by January 1, 2023, which will involve the transfer of storage roadmaps and Red Hat associates to the IBM Storage business unit.

Following this date, Red Hat OpenShift Platform Plus will continue to include OpenShift Data Foundation, sold by Red Hat and its partners.

Additionally, Red Hat OpenStack customers will still be able to buy Red Hat Ceph Storage from Red Hat and its partners. Red Hat OpenShift and Red Hat OpenStack customers with existing subscriptions will be able to maintain and grow their storage footprints as needed, with no change in their Red Hat relationship.

Forthcoming IBM Ceph and IBM Spectrum Fusion storage solutions based on Ceph are expected to ship beginning in the first half of 2023.

For more information about this news, visit www.ibm.com.


Tue, 04 Oct 2022 02:03:00 -0500 en text/html https://www.dbta.com/Editorial/News-Flashes/IBM-Streamlines-Red-Hat-Storage-Products-Within-the-IBM-Storage-Business-Unit-155227.aspx
C2180-188 exam dump and training guide direct download
Training Exams List