Once you memorize these A2090-463 braindumps, you will get 100% marks.

We regarded with our acknowledgment of assisting individuals with breezing through the Assessment- IBM InfoSphere Guardium - Assessment assessment of their absolute first endeavor with our most recent, legitimate, and exceptional A2090-463 test questions and replies. Our prosperity during the beyond two years has been totally heavenly, Thanks to our happy clients who are presently ready to get advancements in their individual associations. killexams.com is the main decision among certificate experts.

Exam Code: A2090-463 Practice exam 2022 by Killexams.com team
Assessment- IBM InfoSphere Guardium - Assessment
IBM Assessment- exam success
Killexams : IBM Assessment- exam success - BingNews https://killexams.com/pass4sure/exam-detail/A2090-463 Search results Killexams : IBM Assessment- exam success - BingNews https://killexams.com/pass4sure/exam-detail/A2090-463 https://killexams.com/exam_list/IBM Killexams : 3 Simple Changes Can Jumpstart Your Success, Says Former IBM VP Who Led a Billion-Dollar Team No result found, try new keyword!But time is not our most precious resource--attention is, according to Shelmina Abji, a former IBM vice president who ... "What differentiates our success is how we allocate our attention." ... Fri, 07 Oct 2022 22:32:00 -0500 text/html https://www.inc.com/minda-zetlin/career-success-tips-shelmina-abji-ibm.html Killexams : Celebrating ThinkPad’s 30th Anniversary - An Insider’s Perspective

Not long after I joined Creative Strategies in 1981, I received a call from IBM looking for forecasts on the PC market. At that time, the PC market was in its infancy, and it was anyone's guess then as to its future growth.

However, they had seen a quote I made to a major tech publication stating that I thought PCs could be a significant growth market and be transformational for the business market. I based that theory on my familiarity with the first spreadsheet product on the Apple II called VisiCalc. I saw how large companies bought Apple IIs and VisiCalc for their accounting departments. (Full disclosure- my wife worked for VisiCorp, the company that made VisiCalc; thus, my familiarity with the product was firsthand.)

That led to a set of research assignments from IBM, and for many years I worked with them on various projects related to the growth of the PC market at the product and channel level.

One of the most interesting programs I was asked to help with was the design of their original laptop in late 1985. At that time, IBM only made large PCs with separate monitors, mostly in battleship grey.

Earlier that year, at CEBIT, a major technology show in Hannover, Germany, Toshiba introduced what became the first actual commercial clamshell laptop design called the T100.

I was at that CEBIT show and the launch of the T100, and I asked to "borrow" it to help me cover the show. Of course, Toshiba denied this request, although they did get me one to test once I was back in the U.S.

IBM was deeply interested in the Toshiba T100 design, and the IBM design group in Austin, TX asked me to consult on the project. So for about a year, I would go between Austin and Atlanta, where part of IBM's technical design was developed, and Boca Raton, where the marketing strategy was developed.

This led to IBM introducing the 5140 in 1986.

This first product was still in the luggable category of personal computers, but soon after it was released, IBM launched its first series of clamshell-based laptops. IBM's first clamshell

was the IBM PS/2 Model L40 SX.

Most of IBM's earliest models had only minor success until 1992, when IBM introduced its first line of ThinkPad models.

In 1988, the father of the ThinkPad, Arimasa Naitoh, a Lenovo Fellow located in Japan, received a call about the need to spearhead a new portable computing venture in IBM's research center in Yokohama, Japan. At the time, he was based in White Plains, NY but moved back to Japan to develop what has become the iconic ThinkPad line of portable computers.

I got to watch the development of the ThinkPad from the beginning. Mr Naitoh's leadership, assisted by David Hill, who was instrumental in creating the unique ThinkPad design, made IBM at that time one of the most important portable computer companies in the market.

This chart shows the design history of the Thinkpad and why it is still a big part of Lenovo's success in portable computing:

Under IBM's leadership, the ThinkPad became one of the best-selling laptops in the enterprise. Still, from its introduction to when Lenovo bought IBM's PC business in 2005, they had only sold 25 million ThinkPads.

However, the ThinkPad's growth under Lenovo's leadership has been remarkable. Today, Lenovo has sold over 200 million ThinkPads, and the company continues to innovate around the ThinkPad design to Improve it. Although many key players inside Lenovo had a significant impact on ThinkPad's growth, its most considerable thrust and success came under the leadership of Dilip Bhatia, Vice President of Global Marketing, User and Customer Experience, and former Vice President and General Manager of ThinkPad.

A great example of their innovative design and thinking comes with their new line of foldable ThinkPads called the ThinkPad X1 Fold.

Although foldable technology is still in its infancy, Lenovo's willingness to blaze new trails with new and innovative designs has been the trademark of Lenovo's design teams since they first introduced the line of ThinkPads in 1992.

Watching the overall growth of the mobile computing market, especially the birth and evolution of the ThinkPad, has given me a deeper appreciation for the men and women who worked so hard to make portable computing the largest PC market today. And the Lenovo team has played a major role in helping the mobile computing industry grow exponentially over that last few decades.

For those interested in the history of the ThinkPad, I recommend Mr. Naitoh's book on the subject-

How the ThinkPad Changed the World and Is Shaping the Future."

Wed, 05 Oct 2022 01:00:00 -0500 Tim Bajarin en text/html https://www.forbes.com/sites/timbajarin/2022/10/05/celebrating-thinkpads-30th-anniversaryan-insiders-perspective/
Killexams : A new ‘common sense’ test for AI could lead to smarter machines

Content provided by IBM and TNW.

Today’s AI systems are quickly evolving to become humans’ new best friend. We now have AIs that can concoct award-winning whiskey, write poetry, and help doctors perform extremely precise surgical operations. But one thing they can’t do — which is, on the surface, far simpler than all those other things — is use common sense.

Common sense is different from intelligence in that it is usually something innate and natural to humans that helps them navigate daily life, and cannot really be taught. In 1906, philosopher G. K. Chesterton wrote that “common sense is a wild thing, savage, and beyond rules.”

Greetings, humanoids

Subscribe to our newsletter now for a weekly recap of our favorite AI stories in your inbox.

Robots, of course, run on algorithms that are just that: rules.

So no, robots can’t use common sense — yet. But thanks to current efforts in the field, we can now measure an AI’s core psychological reasoning ability, bringing us one step closer.

So why does it matter if we teach AI common sense?

Really it comes down to the fact that common sense will make AI better at helping us solve real-world issues. Many argue that AI-driven solutions designed for complex problems, like diagnosing Covid-19 treatments for example, often fail, as the system can’t readily adapt to a real-world situation where the problems are unpredictable, vague, and not defined by rules.

Common sense includes not only social abilities and reasoning but also a “naive sense of physics.”

Injecting common sense into AI could mean big things for humans; better customer service, where a robot can actually assist a disgruntled customer beyond sending them into an endless “Choose from the following options” loop. It can make autonomous cars react better to unexpected roadway incidences. It can even help the military draw life-or-death information from intelligence.

So why haven’t scientists been able to crack the common sense code thus far?

Called the “dark matter of AI”, common sense is both crucial to AI’s future development and, thus far, elusive. Equipping computers with common sense has actually been a goal of computer science since the field’s very start; in 1958, pioneering computer scientist John McCarthy published a paper titled “Programs with common sense” which looked at how logic could be used as a method of representing information in computer memory. But we’ve not moved much closer to making it a reality since.

Common sense includes not only social abilities and reasoning but also a “naive sense of physics” — this means that we know certain things about physics without having to work through physics equations, like why you shouldn’t put a bowling ball on a slanted surface. It also includes basic knowledge of abstract things like time and space, which lets us plan, estimate, and organize. “It’s knowledge that you ought to have,” says Michael Witbrock, AI researcher at the University of Auckland.

All this means that common sense is not one precise thing, and therefore cannot be easily defined by rules.

Secret AGENT

We’ve established that common sense requires a computer to infer things based on complex, real-world situations — something that comes easily to humans, and starts to form since infancy.

Computer scientists are making (slow) but steady progress toward building AI agents that can infer mental states, predict future actions, and work with humans. But in order to see how close we actually are, we first need a rigorous benchmark for evaluating an AI’s “common sense,” or its psychological reasoning ability.

Researchers from IBM, MIT, and Harvard have created just that: AGENT, which stands for Action-Goal-Efficiency-coNstraint-uTility. After testing and validation, this benchmark is shown to be able to evaluate the core psychological reasoning ability of an AI model. This means it can actually give a sense of social awareness and could interact with humans in real-world settings.

To demonstrate common sense, an AI model must have built-in representations of how humans plan.

So what is AGENT? AGENT is a large-scale dataset of 3D animations inspired by experiments that study cognitive development in kids. The animations depict someone interacting with different objects under different physical constraints. According to IBM:

“The videos comprise distinct trials, each of which includes one or more ‘familiarization’ videos of an agent’s typical behavior in a certain physical environment, paired with ‘test’ videos of the same agent’s behavior in a new environment, which are labeled as either ‘expected’ or ‘surprising,’ given the behavior of the agent in the corresponding familiarization videos.”

A model must then judge how surprising the agent’s behaviors in the ‘test’ videos are, based on the actions it learned in the ‘familiarization’ videos. Using the AGENT benchmark, that model is then validated against large-scale human-rating trials, where humans rated the ‘surprising’ ‘test’ videos as more surprising than the ‘expected’ test videos.

Common sense?

IBM’s trial shows that to demonstrate common sense, an AI model must have built-in representations of how humans plan. This means combining both a basic sense of physics and ‘cost-reward trade-offs’, which means an understanding of how humans take actions “based on utility, trading off the rewards of its goal against the costs of reaching it.”

While not yet perfect, the findings show AGENT is a promising diagnostic tool for developing and evaluating common sense in AI, something IBM is also working on. It also shows that we can utilize similar traditional developmental psychology methods to those used to teach human children how objects and ideas relate.

In the future, this could help significantly reduce the need for training in these models allowing businesses to save on computing energy, time, and money.

Robots don’t understand human consciousness yet — but with the development of benchmarking tools like AGENT, we’ll be able to measure how close we’re getting.

Sat, 01 Oct 2022 10:50:00 -0500 en text/html https://thenextweb.com/news/common-sense-test-for-ai-smarter-machines
Killexams : Security Assessment Market Scope 2022: Size, Share, New Innovations and Growth InsightBaseline Cyber Security company, IBM, Absolute Software

marketinsightsreports recently added a new report on Security Assessment Market provides complete overview of Security Assessment industry as all the major business trends, market subtleties and good set-up. Besides this, the report also provides key statistics on the Security Assessment Market status of the leading market players, key trends, and potential growth openings in the market. These study reports are planned with the goal to help the reader in favorable Improve data and make decisions that are helpful to grow their business.

The Security Assessment Market size is projected to accrue voluminously by 2029 registering a phenomenal CAGR of 26.1% during the forecast period (2022 to 2029).

Click here to get the latest sample PDF copy of the report: –


Security Assessment Market Competitive Landscape

The market comprises various national and international players. The market players are investing in R&D and also finding new ways to develop and expand product portfolios. Various players are entering into expansion, new product launches, joint ventures, and partnerships, to strengthen their market position and capture a large customer base. Prominent players in the global Security Assessment include Baseline Cyber Security company, IBM, Absolute Software, Trustwave, Kaspersky, Qualys

Historical background for the demand of security assessment has been studied according to organic and inorganic innovations in order to provide accurate estimates of the market size. Primary factors influencing the growth of the demand for security assessment have also been established with potential gravity. Major regions covered in the study include North America, Western Europe, Eastern Europe, Asia Pacific, Middle East, and Rest of the World

Market segmentation by types:

  • Endpoint Security
  • Network Security
  • Application Security
  • Cloud Security
  • Others

Market segmentation by applications:

  • Banking, Financial Services, and Insurance (BFSI)
  • IT and Telecommunications
  • Government and Defense
  • Energy and Utilities
  • Manufacturing
  • Healthcare
  • Retail
  • Others

Browse Complete Premium Research Report link-: –


Regional Analysis: –

Major regions covered in the report include North America, Asia Pacific, Europe, East & Africa, and South America. In addition, the report provides country level analysis for 25+ major countries including US, Germany, UK, Japan, China, India, UAE, South Korea, South Africa, and Brazil. Regional analysis provides regional as well as country level information about the market highlighting the dynamics of the market by various segments covered in the report.

They said research study covers in-depth analysis of multiple market segments based on type, application, and studies different structures. The report is also inclusive of competitive profiling of the leading Security Assessment market product vendors, and their latest developments. This report has been segmented by type, by application and by geography and also includes the market size and forecast for all these segments. Compounded annual growth rates for all segments have also been provided for 2022 to 2029.

Security Assessment market report, all the requirements and necessities of the businesses have been considered with which they can achieve effective business growth. With a full devotion and dedication, this superior market analysis report is presented to the clients that extend their reach to success. Being a detailed market research report, this report gives business a competitive advantage. This market study helps the customer understand the various drivers and restraints impacting the market during the forecast period. Security Assessment market analysis report provides an examination of various market segments that are relied upon to observe the fastest development amid the estimated forecast frame.

Company Profiling:

To offer a complete insight into the major companies operating in the market. The describing will include the financial health of the company past 2-3 years with segmental and regional revenue breakup, product offering, current developments, SWOT analysis, and key strategies

Some of the key questions answered in this report:

  • What will the market growth rate, growth momentum or acceleration market carries during the forecast period?
  • Which are the key factors driving the Security Assessment market?
  • What was the size of the emerging Security Assessment market by value in 2029?
  • What will be the size of the emerging Security Assessment market in 2029?
  • Which region is expected to hold the highest market share in the Security Assessment market?
  • What trends, challenges and barriers will impact the development and sizing of the Security Assessment market?
  • What is sales volume, revenue, and price analysis of top manufacturers of Security Assessment market?
  • What are the Security Assessment market opportunities and threats faced by the vendors in the Security Assessment Industry?

Significant Features that are under Offering and Key Highlights of the Reports:

  • Examines the Security Assessment industry’s prospects and quickly compares historical, current, and projected market figures.
  • This report examines growth constraints, market drivers and challenges, and current and prospective development prospects.
  • Key market participants are evaluated based on various factors, including revenue share, price, regional growth, and product portfolio, to demonstrate how market shares have changed in the past and are expected to change in the future.
  • Describes the expansion of the Security Assessment market across various industries and geographies. This allows players to concentrate their efforts on regional markets with the potential for rapid growth in the short term.
  • Discuss the global, regional, and national ramifications of COVID-19.

About Us:

Market Insights Reports is a Global market research firm that takes pride in its work, providing comprehensive and accurate analysis of a wide range of markets and customers around the world. Market Insights Reports has the exclusive goal of offering clients with the highest quality research and detailed research possible.

Contact Us:

Irfan Tamboli (Head of Sales) – Market Insights Reports Phone:

+1704 266 3234 | +91-750-707-8687

[email protected] | [email protected]


This Press Release has been written with the intention of providing accurate market information which will enable our readers to make informed strategic investment decisions. If you notice any problem with this content, please feel free to reach us on [email protected]

Wed, 21 Sep 2022 21:00:00 -0500 Xherald en-US text/html https://www.digitaljournal.com/pr/security-assessment-market-scope-2022-size-share-new-innovations-and-growth-insightbaseline-cyber-security-company-ibm-absolute-software
Killexams : The Real Secret To Microsoft's Success

For people of a certain persuasion, it’s fun to make fun of Microsoft (MSFT). It's outdated and occasionally bloated software. An operating system version so despised that most users refused to upgrade from its predecessor and instead waited for its replacement. A browser that once held 95% of world market share, no longer leads in any country. And mobile phones that barely register in a universe dominated by iPhone and Android.

Key Takeaways

  • Microsoft is a household name with commonly known product lines like Windows, Office, and Xbox.
  • Founded more than 30 years ago, Microsoft has expanded way beyond software and devices into cloud computing and services
  • Microsoft is the most widely held stock in index funds and ETFs in 2019.

Microsoft Matures its Business

Many (alright, some) of us are old enough to remember when Microsoft was the very definition of novel, its youthful founders and their unorthodox culture flying in the face of a formal, understated business world that had limited use for, or knowledge of, computers. Today, Microsoft is a grey-flannel pillar of the Dow, and that’s a welcome occurrence. The alternative would have been for the brash software upstart to be of no consequence today.

Still, at times it seems the consensus sentiment about Microsoft prompts questions such as “How on Earth do they make so much money?” After all, Microsoft isn’t the most innovative company in the world, nor the most limber. However, critics seem to forget something: a) Microsoft is the world’s largest software maker, b) people have great utility for software, and c) Microsoft is not just a software maker anymore.

Microsoft under CEO Satya Nadella

Under the leadership of CEO Satya Nadella, who took the reigns in 2014, Microsoft has moved aggressively into services and cloud computing. It's Azure cloud computing system now has a solid percentage of market share globally, second only to Amazon Web Services, and accounts for nearly one third of the company's overall revenue.

Microsoft revenue topped $125 billion in revenue last year, and pulled in $42 billion in operating income. With a 29% profit margin, which is considerably larger than that of either Apple (Nasdaq:AAPL) or Alphabet (Nasdaq:GOOG), two companies that popular opinion assumes have overtaken Microsoft.

Stalwart and Ubiquitous

That popular opinion derives from a false assumption: that a new product line with frequent updates is the surest path to success in the technology sector. Not true. Take Surface, Redmond’s answer to Apple’s iPad. It isn’t the kind of product that makes nor breaks a company with the power and magnitude of Microsoft. Rather, it’s a way to stay relevant in the consumer electronics market – of course, the idea is for Surface to create enough profit to justify the expenses behind it, but a couple million satisfied Surface owners have only a minimal effect on Microsoft’s net profit numbers. The same goes for the formidable Xbox, whose sexiness as a gaming console vastly outweighs its contributions to Microsoft’s overall financial picture.

Microsoft vs. the S&P500 since 2010.

The truth is somewhat more pedestrian. Perhaps it’s because Microsoft is so ubiquitous, a constant reminder in the daily lives of those who use its products. Every time you turn your computer on, Microsoft’s logo is staring at you, even if you’re a Mac or Linux user who nevertheless uses Microsoft’s Office suite. Shouldn’t a company with so wide and deep a footprint make it its business to endlessly delight and fascinate us, with a youthful exuberance and a penchant for self-promotion? You know, like Google does?

The fact is, more than four decades after its incorporation, Microsoft is as staid and disciplined as IBM (NYSE:IBM), ITT (NYSE:ITT), Litton Industries and the other companies that rounded out the upper reaches of the Fortune 500 back in 1975. The software giant is primarily in the business of making money, which sounds tautological at first read, but really isn’t. Microsoft is no longer in the raw experimentation stage common to young and growing companies. Rather, its modus operandi is to create profitability streams, then maintain and expand them.

Software as a Service

The name of Microsoft’s “Productivity and Business Processes Division” may sound unhelpfully generic, but it refers to the part of the operations that’s responsible for creating the stupendously profitable Office. The suite started as an adjunct, a method for showcasing Microsoft’s revolutionary operating system. But since Office’s 1990 debut, the applications that comprise it have become just about mandatory for anyone wanting to conduct business. Over a billion people now use Office, to the point where Word and Excel are practically synonymous with word processing and spreadsheets, respectively. Multiply that user base by $150 per license for the stripped-down Home & Student version of Office, a product whose marginal cost is close to zero, and it’s easy to see why Microsoft does everything in its power to maintain Office’s profitability (and why competitors from OpenOffice to Google Docs want nothing more than to chip away at Office’s market share.)

The Business Division’s only serious competitor for dominance at Microsoft is the company’s Windows Division, whose latest contribution to the marketplace is Windows 10. Windows’ share of the worldwide operating system market is more than 35%.

The Bottom Line

All-in-one entertainment systems (Xbox One) and free audio- and video-conferencing around the world (Skype) may be exciting, the kind of things that make life in the 21st century more enjoyable, but their impact on Microsoft’s income are minimal. Instead, the company’s secret to staggering riches lies in the daily business of allowing users to create and manipulate documents; and providing the software that performs a computer’s most important function – permitting data to make it from your computer’s hardware components to its display. It isn’t alluring, but it pays the bills ... to an extent few companies in history can match.

Sat, 17 Sep 2022 19:09:00 -0500 en text/html https://www.investopedia.com/stock-analysis/032014/real-secret-microsofts-success-msft-aapl-goog-ibm.aspx
Killexams : International Business Machines Corp

52 week range

114.56 - 144.73

  • Open121.80
  • Day High122.88
  • Day Low121.43
  • Prev Close120.04
  • 52 Week High144.73
  • 52 Week High Date06/06/22
  • 52 Week Low114.56
  • 52 Week Low Date11/26/21
  • Market Cap110.445B
  • Shares Out903.18M
  • 10 Day Average Volume4.46M
  • Dividend6.60
  • Dividend Yield5.40%
  • Beta0.83
  • YTD % Change-8.57


  • Open121.80
  • Day High122.88
  • Day Low121.43
  • Prev Close120.04
  • 52 Week High144.73
  • 52 Week High Date06/06/22
  • 52 Week Low114.56
  • 52 Week Low Date11/26/21
  • Market Cap110.445B
  • Shares Out903.18M
  • 10 Day Average Volume4.46M
  • Dividend6.60
  • Dividend Yield5.40%
  • Beta0.83
  • YTD % Change-8.57


  • EPS (TTM)6.42
  • P/E (TTM)19.04
  • Fwd P/E (NTM)12.54
  • EBITDA (TTM)11.935B
  • ROE (TTM)27.73%
  • Revenue (TTM)59.677B
  • Gross Margin (TTM)54.01%
  • Net Margin (TTM)9.61%
  • Debt To Equity (MRQ)259.21%


  • Earnings Date10/19/2022
  • Ex Div Date08/09/2022
  • Div Amount1.65
  • Split Date-
  • Split Factor-

Thu, 13 Oct 2022 11:59:00 -0500 en text/html https://www.cnbc.com/quotes/IBM
Killexams : ‘Tear the paper ceiling’: A new campaign wants companies to ditch 4-year degree requirements No result found, try new keyword!Job applicants without a college degree have a much harder time getting hired—particularly in jobs with upward mobility. Opportunity@Work is trying to change that. Fri, 07 Oct 2022 07:13:00 -0500 text/html https://www.fastcompany.com/90793959/tear-the-paper-ceiling-a-new-campaign-wants-companies-to-ditch-4-year-degree-requirements Killexams : What Type Of Leadership Contributes Most To Company Growth?

Mike Meisenheimer is a marketing principal at The Alexander Group, a revenue growth management consultancy.

Why do some companies withstand the test of time and not others? Does leadership or the organization itself make the difference when it comes to long-term growth?

When you consider the shortlist of companies that have truly endured—those with consistent revenue growth or stock price appreciation over 20 years or more—they tend to fall into one of three categories based on leadership.

1. Companies Synonymous With Their Leaders

Our first category comprises businesses with objectively solid performance and name recognition. Often, these companies were built from the ground up, starting with a small team and a quality product and adapting to changing landscapes over time. Eventually, the leadership becomes synonymous with the company. Employees look to leaders for guidance, and stockholders watch them to see where the company is going next. These companies may go through leadership changes and challenges, but they endure and emerge stronger.

Apple exemplifies this category of enduring business. The company developed around a visionary leader, Steve Jobs, who forged the company’s path. Apple grew with its leader into an extremely profitable company that continues to give back to shareholders through innovative offerings.

Apple has endured its fair share of struggle as well. After displaying solid profit margins from 1985 to 1995, the company struggled to maintain that performance. Revenue growth became negative in 1996 and again in 2001 after new leaders suffered failed product launches. The company pivoted when Jobs returned to his old post, shifting focus to the consumer electronics they are now known for. When Jobs’ health became tenuous, Tim Cook transitioned to the role of CEO in 2011 and propelled the company forward with the success of the iPhone 4S. The original figurehead of the company passed on, but leadership endured and led the company to newfound prosperity in a tech-enabled world.

Apple remains a flagship, trusted brand with enduring positioning in the market. Other companies in this category include Disney and Amazon, whose founder-based brands continue to stand out among their competitors even as new leaders step in.

If your company falls into this category, succession planning becomes a course of both external and internal interest. At some point, even the best leaders move on (voluntarily or involuntarily), and customers, employees and investors need to have confidence in the “next generation” of leadership.

2. Companies Whose Leadership Is A Vehicle For Success

For the second category of enduring businesses, leadership has a prominent impact on success—and is leveraged as a parachute during times of struggle. Some companies in this category have strong ideas but lack the right leadership team to take the company in a new direction. Others might attain great success during times of economic prosperity but struggle to maintain that performance during downturns.

This was the case for Starbucks, whose growth soared (account required) in the early 2000s. During the Great Recession, though, they hemorrhaged profits and ultimately closed 600 stores. To kickstart a recovery, Starbucks brought back Howard Schultz, who had previously served as CEO starting in 1984. In his second leadership stint, he hit the ground running with “My Starbucks Idea,” an interactive platform where customers shared suggestions for improving the company’s products and experience. This out-of-the-box idea pushed Starbucks shares up 649% by 2012, from where they bottomed out in 2008.

For companies in this category, leadership makes a world of a difference when performance plateaus or trends are negative. These companies may have a solid product and loyal client base, but their leadership ultimately serves as the tipping point for endurance over time. Other companies in this category include IBM and General Motors, both of which were pushed to the brink but ultimately prevailed due to exceptional leadership.

If your company falls into this category, help other leaders in the organization develop key leadership skills. There may never be another Howard Schultz, but leaders can adapt lessons from his efforts to help bridge challenging times and pursue new opportunities.

3. Companies With Frequent Leadership Changes

Businesses in our final category have great products and performance and consistently make seamless changes in leadership. These companies often survive for more than a century, continuing to succeed after their initial leaders retire. With frequent leadership changes, the company itself must remain unified to stand the test of time.

Eli Lilly & Co. is a great example of this category of enduring business. The company was family-owned for three generations, with each successor of founder Eli Lilly offering a unique management style, but all committed to their community and employees. The company carried these values forward even after leadership changed hands to non-family members in 1953. The company’s storied legacy and robust product suite all contribute to its long-term success, while its steady stream of leaders acts as stewards seamlessly guiding the company forward.

Other companies in this category include Kansas City Southern and Marriott International. For them, leadership is certainly important but is not the end-all-be-all; rather, leaders help sustain what is already a solid growth track. These companies adapt and endure through business cycle ups and downs. Businesses like Eli Lilly certainly don’t drive themselves, but like a car in cruise control, they benefit from a series of attentive drivers who help maintain the course.

If your company falls into this category, it’s tough to overstate the importance of a shared mission embraced throughout the organization and a culture driven by that mission. They are touchstones that reduce the risks of leadership turnover and smooth out differences in leadership styles.

Final Thoughts

When it comes to enduring businesses, is it the company or the leader who makes the difference? It can be hard to separate the two. What successful companies often share is dedication to a mission, an organizational culture with a bias toward action and a passion for improving, a relentless focus on talent and accountability and an investment in their people. Those shared traits become part of the organization’s DNA, enabling the company to build a legacy for new leaders to uphold.

Forbes Business Development Council is an invitation-only community for sales and biz dev executives. Do I qualify?

Wed, 12 Oct 2022 23:00:00 -0500 Mike Meisenheimer en text/html https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbesbusinessdevelopmentcouncil/2022/10/13/what-type-of-leadership-contributes-most-to-company-growth/
Killexams : Test Data Management Market 2022 Global Industry Size, recent Trends, Demand and Share Estimation by 2028 with Top Key-Players by Top Countries

The MarketWatch News Department was not involved in the creation of this content.

Oct 03, 2022 (The Expresswire) -- "Final Report will add the analysis of the impact of COVID-19 on this Test Data Management industry."

Global "Test Data Management Market" (2022-2028) report provides key analysis on the market status of Test Data Management manufacturers with the best facts and figures, definitions, SWOT analysis, expert opinions and the latest developments around the world. The all-inclusive market research report also offers Porter’s Five Forces Analysis and profiles some of the leading players of the global Test Data Management Market. It sheds light on changing market dynamics and discusses about different growth drivers, market challenges and restraints, and trends and opportunities in detail. Interested parties are provided with market recommendations and business advice to ensure success in the global Test Data Management market.

Global Test Data Management Market Report 2022 is spread across 125 pages and provides exclusive vital statistics, data, information, trends and competitive landscape details in this niche sector.

Get a sample PDF of the report at- https://www.researchreportsworld.com/enquiry/request-sample/21587657

List of TOP KEY PLAYERS in Test Data Management Market Report are -

● Cigniti Technologies
● Compuware
● Delphix
● Informatica
● Infosys
● Innovative Routines International
● Solix Technologies

The information for each competitor includes - Company Profile, Main Business Information, SWOT Analysis, Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin, Market Share.

Test Data Management Market Analysis and Insight:

Market Analysis and Insights: Global Test Data Management Market

Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the global Test Data Management market size is estimated to be worth USD 816.1 million in 2021 and is forecast to a readjusted size of USD 816.1 million by 2028 with a CAGR of 10.4% during the review period. Fully considering the economic change by this health crisis, by Type accounting for % of the Test Data Management global market in 2021, is projected to value USD million by 2028, growing at a revised % CAGR in the post-COVID-19 period. While by Type segment is altered to an % CAGR throughout this forecast period.

The United States Test Data Management market is estimated at USD million in 2021, while China is forecast to reach USD million by 2028. The proportion of the United States is % in 2021, while Chinese percentage is %, and it is predicted that China’s share will reach % in 2028, trailing a CAGR of % through the analysis period.

The global key manufacturers of Test Data Management include Cigniti Technologies, Compuware, DATPROF, Delphix, IBM, Informatica, Infosys, Innovative Routines International and MENTIS and etc. In 2021, the global top five players have a share approximately % in terms of revenue.

In United States, in terms of revenue, in 2021, the top three players hold a share about %, while in China, top three players hold a share nearly %.

Global Test Data Management Scope and Market Size

The global Test Data Management market is segmented by company, region (country), by Type and by Application. Players, stakeholders, and other participants in the global Test Data Management market will be able to gain the upper hand as they use the report as a powerful resource. The segmental analysis focuses on sales, revenue and forecast by region (country), by Type and by Application for the period 2017-2028.

Get a sample Copy of the Test Data Management Market Report 2022-2028

Global Test Data Management Market Segmentation By Types, By Applications and By Region:

Global Test Data Management market analysis and market size information is provided by regions (countries). Segment by Application, the Test Data Management market is segmented into United States, Europe, China, Japan, Southeast Asia, India and Rest of World. The report includes region-wise Test Data Management market forecast period from history 2017-2028. It also includes market size and forecast by players, by Type, and by Application segment in terms of sales and revenue for the period 2017-2028.

The report introduced the Test Data Management basics: definitions, classifications, applications and market overview; product specifications; manufacturing processes; cost structures, raw materials and so on. Then it analyzed the world’s main region market conditions, including the product price, profit, capacity, production, supply, demand and market growth rate and forecast etc. In the end, the report introduced new project SWOT analysis, investment feasibility analysis, and investment return analysis.

Competitive Landscape and Test Data Management Market Share Analysis:

Test Data Management market size competitive landscape provides details and data information by players. The report offers comprehensive analysis and accurate statistics on revenue by the player for the period 2017-2021. It also offers detailed analysis supported by reliable statistics on revenue (global and regional level) by players for the period 2017-2021. Details included are company description, major business, company total revenue and the sales, revenue generated in Test Data Management business, the date to enter into the Test Data Management market, Test Data Management product introduction, recent developments, etc.

The report offers detailed coverage of Test Data Management industry and main market trends with impact of coronavirus. The market research includes historical and forecast market data, demand, application details, price trends, and company shares of the leading Test Data Management by geography. The report splits the market size, by volume and value, on the basis of application type and geography. Report covers the present status and the future prospects of the global Test Data Management market for 2017-2028.

Global Test Data Management Market report forecast to 2028 is a professional and comprehensive research report on the world’s major regional market conditions, focusing on the main regions (North America, Europe and Asia-Pacific) and the main countries (United States, Germany, United Kingdom, Japan, South Korea and China).

COVID-19 Impact on Market:

The recent COVID-19 outbreak first began in Wuhan (China) in December 2019, and since then, it has spread around the globe at a fast pace. China, Italy, Iran, Spain, the Republic of Korea, France, Germany, and the US are among the worst-affected countries in terms of positive cases and reported deaths, as of March 2020. The COVID-19 outbreak has affected economies and industries in various countries due to lockdowns, travel bans, and business shutdowns. The global food and beverage industry is one of the major industries facing serious disruptions such as supply chain breaks, technology events cancellations, and office shutdowns as a result of this outbreak. China is the global manufacturing hub, with the presence of and the largest raw material suppliers. The overall market breaks down due to COVID-19 is also affecting the growth of thebaconmarket due to shutting down of factories, obstacle in supply chain, and downturn in world economy.

To Know How COVID-19 Pandemic Will Impact Test Data Management Market/Industry- Request a sample copy of the report- https://www.researchreportsworld.com/enquiry/request-covid19/21587657

Test Data Management Market Segment by Type:

● On-Premises ● Cloud

Test Data Management Market Segment by Applications:

● Information Technology (IT) ● Telecom ● BFSI ● Healthcare and Life Sciences ● Government ● Retail ● Others

Test Data Management Market Segment by Region:

● North America (the United States, Canada and Mexico) ● Europe (Germany, UK, France, Italy, Russia and Turkey, etc.) ● Asia-Pacific (China, Japan, Korea, India, Australia and Southeast Asia (Indonesia, Thailand, Philippines, Malaysia, and Vietnam)) ● South America (Brazil etc.) ● The Middle East and Africa (North Africa and GCC Countries)

Geographic Segmentation

The report offers exhaustive assessment of different region-wise and country-wise Test Data Management market such as U.S., Canada, Germany, France, U.K., Italy, Russia, China, Japan, South Korea, India, Australia, Taiwan, Indonesia, Thailand, Malaysia, Philippines, Vietnam, Mexico, Brazil, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, U.A.E, etc. Key regions covered in the report are North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, Latin America, and the Middle East and Africa.

For the period 2017-2028, the report provides country-wise revenue and volume sales analysis and region-wise revenue and volume analysis of the global Test Data Management market. For the period 2017-2021, it provides sales (consumption) analysis and forecast of different regional markets by Application as well as by Type in terms of volume.

Enquire before purchasing this report-https://www.researchreportsworld.com/enquiry/pre-order-enquiry/21587657

Key Questions Answered in The Report:

● What are the strengths and weaknesses of the key vendors? ● Who are the Leading key players and what are their Key Business plans in the near future? ● What will be the Test Data Management market growth rate and size in the coming year? ● What are the main key factors driving the global Test Data Management market? ● What are the key market trends impacting the growth of the global Test Data Management market? ● Which are Trending factors influencing the market shares of the top regions across the globe? What is the impact of Covid-19 on the current industry? ● Who are the key market players and what are their strategies in the global Test Data Management market? ● What are the market opportunities and threats faced by the vendors in the global Test Data Management market? What industrial trends, drivers, and challenges are manipulating its growth? ● What are the key outcomes of the five forces analysis of the global Test Data Management market?

Reasons to Purchase this Report:

● Analyzing the outlook of the market with the recent trends and SWOT analysis. ● Market dynamics scenario, along with growth opportunities of the market in the years to come. ● Market segmentation analysis including qualitative and quantitative research incorporating the impact of economic and non-economic aspects. ● Regional and country level analysis integrating the demand and supply forces that are influencing the growth of the market. ● Market value (USD Million) and volume (Units Million) data for each segment and sub-segment ● Competitive landscape involving the market share of major players, along with the new projects and strategies adopted by players in the past years. ● Comprehensive company profiles covering the product offerings, key financial information, recent developments, SWOT analysis, and strategies employed by the major market players.

Purchase this report (Price 4000 USD for single user license)- https://www.researchreportsworld.com/purchase/21587657

Major Points from Table of Contents:

1 Report Overview
1.1 Study Scope
1.2 Market Analysis by Type
1.2.1 Global Test Data Management Market Size by Type (2017 VS 2021VS 2028)
1.2.2 On-Premises
1.2.3 Cloud
1.3 Market by Application
1.3.1 Global Test Data Management Market Share by Application (2017 VS 2021 VS 2028)
1.3.2 Information Technology (IT)
1.3.3 Telecom
1.3.4 BFSI
1.3.5 Healthcare and Life Sciences
1.3.6 Government
1.3.7 Retail
1.3.8 Others
1.4 Study Objectives
1.5 Years Considered

2 Global Growth Trends
2.1 Global Test Data Management Market Perspective (2017-2028)
2.2 Global Test Data Management Market Size by Region: 2017 VS 2021 VS 2028
2.3 Global Test Data Management Revenue Market Share by Region (2017-2022)
2.4 Global Test Data Management Revenue Forecast by Region (2023-2028)
2.5 Geographic Market Analysis: Market Facts and Figures
2.5.1 United States Test Data Management Estimates and Projections (2017-2028)
2.5.2 Europe Test Data Management Estimates and Projections (2017-2028)
2.5.3 China Test Data Management Estimates and Projections (2017-2028)
2.5.4 Japan Test Data Management Estimates and Projections (2017-2028)
2.5.5 Southeast Asia Test Data Management Estimates and Projections (2017-2028)
2.5.6 India Test Data Management Estimates and Projections (2017-2028)

3 Global Test Data Management Competition Landscape by Players
3.1 Global Top Test Data Management Players by Revenue (2017-2022)
3.1.1 Global Top Test Data Management Players by Revenue (2017-2022)
3.1.2 Global Test Data Management Revenue Market Share by Players (2017-2022)
3.2 Global Test Data Management Market Share by Company Type (Tier 1, Tier 2 and Tier 3)
3.3 Players Covered: Ranking by Test Data Management Revenue
3.4 Global Test Data Management Market Concentration Ratio
3.4.1 Global Test Data Management Market Concentration Ratio (CR5 and HHI)
3.4.2 Global Top 10 and Top 5 Companies by Test Data Management Revenue in 2021
3.5 Test Data Management Key Players Head office and Area Served
3.6 Key Players Test Data Management Product Solution and Service
3.7 Date of Enter into Test Data Management Market
3.8 Mergers and Acquisitions, Expansion Plans

4 Test Data Management Breakdown Data by Type
4.1 Global Test Data Management Historic Market Size by Type (2017-2022)
4.2 Global Test Data Management Forecasted Market Size by Type (2023-2028)

5 Test Data Management Breakdown Data by Application
5.1 Global Test Data Management Historic Market Size by Application (2017-2022)
5.2 Global Test Data Management Forecasted Market Size by Application (2023-2028)

6 United States Test Data Management Market Facts and Figures
6.1 United States Test Data Management Revenue by Company (2017-2022)
6.2 United States Test Data Management Market Size by Type
6.2.1 United States Test Data Management Market Size by Type (2017-2022)
6.2.2 United States Test Data Management Market Size by Type (2023-2028)
6.2.3 United States Test Data Management Market Share by Type (2017-2028)
6.3 United States Test Data Management Market Size by Application
6.3.1 United States Test Data Management Market Size by Application (2017-2022)
6.3.2 United States Test Data Management Market Size by Application (2023-2028)
6.3.3 United States Test Data Management Market Share by Application (2017-2028)

7 Europe Test Data Management Market Facts and Figures
7.1 Europe Test Data Management Revenue by Company (2017-2022)
7.2 Europe Test Data Management Market Size by Type
7.2.1 Europe Test Data Management Market Size by Type (2017-2022)
7.2.2 Europe Test Data Management Market Size by Type (2023-2028)
7.2.3 Europe Test Data Management Market Share by Type (2017-2028)
7.3 Europe Test Data Management Market Size by Application
7.3.1 Europe Test Data Management Market Size by Application (2017-2022)
7.3.2 Europe Test Data Management Market Size by Application (2023-2028)
7.3.3 Europe Test Data Management Market Share by Application (2017-2028)

8 China Test Data Management Market Facts and Figures
8.1 China Test Data Management Revenue by Company (2017-2022)
8.2 China Test Data Management Market Size by Type
8.2.1 China Test Data Management Market Size by Type (2017-2022)
8.2.2 China Test Data Management Market Size by Type (2023-2028)
8.2.3 China Test Data Management Market Share by Type (2017-2028)
8.3 China Test Data Management Market Size by Application
8.3.1 China Test Data Management Market Size by Application (2017-2022)
8.3.2 China Test Data Management Market Size by Application (2023-2028)
8.3.3 China Test Data Management Market Share by Application (2017-2028)

Continued . . .

With tables and figures helping analyze worldwide Global Test Data Management market trends, this research provides key statistics on the state of the industry and is a valuable source of guidance and direction for companies and individuals interested in the market.

Browse complete table of contents athttps://www.researchreportsworld.com/TOC/21587657

About Us:

Research Reports World - is the credible source for gaining the market reports that will provide you with the lead your business needs. At Research Reports World, our objective is providing a platform for many top-notch market research firms worldwide to publish their research reports, as well as helping the decision makers in finding most suitable market research solutions under one roof. Our aim is to provide the best solution that matches the exact customer requirements. This drives us to provide you with custom or syndicated research reports.

Contact Us:

Research Reports World


US (+1) 424 253 0807

UK (+44) 203 239 8187

Email: sales@researchreportsworld.com

Website: https://www.researchreportsworld.com/

Our Other Reports:

Microgrid Automation Market Share Value 2022 Industry Top Players, Trends, Global Growth Rate by Size Expansion Strategies 2028 Report Includes COVID-19 Analysis

Diameter Signaling Market Size in 2022 | Growth, Share, Future Trends, Growth Key Factors, Demand, Key Players | Forecast till 2025

Drilling Hose Market 2022 Worldwide Impact of COVID-19 on Industry, Share, Gross Margin, Trend, Future Demand, Analysis by Top Leading Player and Forecast till 2028

Construction Fall Protection Equipment Market Share, Size 2022 Business Revenue, Future Growth, Trends Plans, Top Key Players, Business Opportunities, Industry Analysis by Forecast to 2028

Absorption Chiller System Market Share, Growth, 2022 Global Size, Future Trends, Key Factors, Demand, Manufacture Players, Scope and Opportunities Analysis by Outlook 2028 | COVID-19 Impact on Industry

Flow Cytometry Fluorophores Market Share, Size, 2022 Industry Growth, Business Revenue, Future Plans, Top Key Players, Business Opportunities, Global Size Analysis by Forecast to 2028 Top Countries Data

Press Release Distributed by The Express Wire

To view the original version on The Express Wire visit Test Data Management Market 2022 Global Industry Size, recent Trends, Demand and Share Estimation by 2028 with Top Key-Players by Top Countries


Is there a problem with this press release? Contact the source provider Comtex at editorial@comtex.com. You can also contact MarketWatch Customer Service via our Customer Center.

The MarketWatch News Department was not involved in the creation of this content.

Sun, 02 Oct 2022 19:02:00 -0500 en-US text/html https://www.marketwatch.com/press-release/test-data-management-market-2022-global-industry-size-recent-trends-demand-and-share-estimation-by-2028-with-top-key-players-by-top-countries-2022-10-03
Killexams : Global Business Leaders Say Hybrid Cloud is Critical to Modernization, Yet Security, Skills and Compliance Concerns Impede Success
  • New IBM Transformation Index: State of Cloud helps business leaders to assess gaps in their transformation journey
  • More than half of respondents are currently concerned about security, while 53% believe ensuring compliance in the cloud is currently too difficult
  • Nearly 70% surveyed say their team lacks the skills needed to sufficiently manage cloud environments

ARMONK, N.Y., Sept. 28, 2022 /CNW/ -- New global market research from IBM (NYSE: IBM) revealed that more than 77% of respondents have adopted a hybrid cloud approach which can help drive digital transformation, yet the majority of responding organizations are struggling with the complexity to make all their cloud environments work together. As organizations face skills gaps, security challenges and compliance obstacles, less than one quarter of respondents across the globe manage their hybrid cloud environments holistically – which can create blind spots and put data at risk.

The IBM Transformation Index: State of Cloud commissioned by IBM and conducted by independent research firm, The Harris Poll, was created to help organizations map their cloud transformation and empower them to self-classify their progress. Built on a foundation that leverages insights from experienced cloud professionals, enterprises can use the Index to gain measurable metrics that can help quantify their progress and uncover areas of opportunity and growth. The Index consisted of more than 3,000 business and technology decision-makers from 12 countries and across 15 industries including financial services, manufacturing, government, telecommunications and healthcare, to understand where organizations are advancing, or merely emerging, on their transformation journeys.

The Index points to a strong correlation between hybrid cloud adoption and progress in digital transformation. In fact, 71% of those surveyed think it's difficult to realize the full potential of a digital transformation without having a solid hybrid cloud strategy in place. At the same time, only 27% of those surveyed possess the necessary characteristics to be considered as "advanced" in their transformation. So, why the disconnect? A sampling of findings include:

  • Compliance: Businesses believe ensuring compliance in the cloud is currently too difficult – especially as we see enforcement of regulatory and compliance requirements heat up across the globe.
  • Security: While businesses have embraced a variety of security techniques to secure workloads in the cloud, concerns about security still remain.
  • Skills: As organizations face the realities of a talent shortage, they are failing to implement a holistic hybrid cloud strategy – which can create gaps in security and compliance and cause risk across cloud environments.

"As we see regulatory requirements grow across the globe, compliance is top of mind for business leaders. This concern is even greater for those in highly regulated industries. Yet at the same time, they are facing a growing threat landscape – one that demands holistic management of their multicloud environments to avoid the risks of a Frankencloud – an environment that's so disconnected, it's difficult to navigate and can be nearly impossible to secure, particularly against third and fourth party risks," said Howard Boville, Head of IBM Cloud Platform. "An integration strategy to bring together these different piece parts is what we believe separates the leaders from the rest of the pack – the alternative is to pay the price of the Frankencloud."

"The key value of cloud for businesses is rapid access to innovative technologies, data sources, and applications required to navigate current disruptions and transform businesses. No individual cloud can address all of an enterprise's requirements, so they must be able to use and effectively control hybrid cloud assets across many locations. IBM with its focus on providing a holistic hybrid cloud strategy is well positioned to help organizations address the security, data management and compliance complexities that can prevent them from taking full advantage of cloud innovation," says Rick Villars, Group Vice President of Worldwide Research at IDC. 

The 2022 IBM Transformation Index: State of Cloud revealed:

Lack of the right skills is inhibiting progress 
When it comes to managing their cloud applications, 69% of respondents say their team lacks the skills needed to be proficient. This is a major roadblock to innovation, with more than a quarter of respondents saying skills and talent shortages are impeding their business's cloud objectives. The effects don't stop here – these limitations are also preventing organizations from leveraging the power of partnerships. More than one-third of respondents say a lack of technical skills is holding them back from integrating ecosystem partners into cloud environments. This challenge is even greater in the US, where nearly 40% admit to this lack of skills – pointing to the need for talent.

Exposure to cyberthreats continues to lurk despite embracing security techniques
While more than 90% of responding financial services, telecommunications and government organizations have adopted security tools such as confidential computing capabilities, multifactor authentication and more, gaps remain that are preventing organizations from driving innovation. In fact, 32% of overall respondents cite security as the top barrier for integrated workloads across environments and more than one quarter of respondents agree security concerns present a roadblock to achieving their cloud business goals.

Security concerns can even hold organizations back from unlocking the full potential of partnerships. As potential security gaps can cause third and fourth party risks to loom, respondents say data governance (49%) and cybersecurity (47%) are the top challenges to fully integrating their business ecosystem into the cloud. In Brazil, cyberthreats are an even greater concern to ecosystem innovation -- 51% say cybersecurity risks pose a major challenge for businesses that want to integrate business ecosystem partners into cloud environments.

Regulatory and compliance requirements remain center stage causing businesses to pause
With regulations on the rise, so too are compliance challenges. 53% of respondents believe that ensuring compliance in the cloud is currently too difficult and nearly one-third cite regulatory compliance issues as a key barrier for integrating workloads across private and public IT environments. In financial services, for example, more than a quarter of respondents agree that meeting industry requirements is holding them back from fully achieving their cloud objectives. These challenges span the globe and are especially prevalent in countries such as Singapore, China, India and Japan.

Based on the Index, IBM will launch an interactive tool to serve as a continual source of feedback for organizations to measure their transformation progress. With the ability to help companies assess how they fare against others, the tool will allow them to identify areas where transformation is stalled and where it may be excelling – unlocking the ability to diagnose and act with efficiency even against the real-world of complexity of cloud transformation.

IBM will make the IBM Transformation Index: State of Cloud tool publicly available in the coming months, aiming to provide business leaders with valuable benchmarking insights that can inform their hybrid cloud strategies. The IBM Institute for Business Value also published a new report, "A Comparative Look at Enterprise Cloud Strategy" with an action guide for how leaders can use the Index to help advance their organizations' digital transformation.

This survey was conducted online in 12 countries (US, Canada, UK, Germany, France, India, Japan, China, Brazil, Spain, Singapore, Australia) by The Harris Poll on behalf of IBM from June 8th, 2022 to July 17th, 2022. The survey was conducted among 3,014 IT and business professionals in companies with annual revenue over $500M who have deep knowledge of their organization's Cloud strategy. The IBM Transformation Index: State of Cloud was developed by combining the data from 25+ question batteries of various formats across 9 Cloud-related dimensions that were informed by input from industry experts. 

About IBM
IBM is a leading global hybrid cloud and AI, and consulting services provider, helping clients in more than 175 countries capitalize on insights from their data, streamline business processes, reduce costs and gain the competitive edge in their industries. Nearly 3,800 government and corporate entities in critical infrastructure areas such as financial services, telecommunications and healthcare rely on IBM's hybrid cloud platform and Red Hat OpenShift to affect their digital transformations quickly, efficiently, and securely. IBM's breakthrough innovations in AI, quantum computing, industry-specific cloud solutions and business services deliver open and flexible options to our clients. All of this is backed by IBM's legendary commitment to trust, transparency, responsibility, inclusivity, and service. For more information, visit www.ibm.com.

Kaveri Camire
IBM Communications

Suzanne Cross
IBM Communications

View original content to get multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/global-business-leaders-say-hybrid-cloud-is-critical-to-modernization-yet-security-skills-and-compliance-concerns-impede-success-301634987.html


View original content to get multimedia: http://www.newswire.ca/en/releases/archive/September2022/28/c3369.html

© 2022 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.

Tue, 27 Sep 2022 16:21:00 -0500 text/html https://www.benzinga.com/pressreleases/22/09/n29045665/global-business-leaders-say-hybrid-cloud-is-critical-to-modernization-yet-security-skills-and-comp
A2090-463 exam dump and training guide direct download
Training Exams List